N-archive/citra
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

SVC: Moved declaration of "wait" variable in SendSyncRequest for improved readability.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
bunnei 2014-06-06 00:44:44 -04:00
parent f922bd14c1
commit 3f469e147f
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
src/core/hle/svc.cpp
View file

@ -90,12 +90,12 @@ Result ConnectToPort(void* _out, const char* port_name) {
/// Synchronize to an OS service /// Synchronize to an OS service
Result SendSyncRequest(Handle handle) { Result SendSyncRequest(Handle handle) {
bool wait = false;
Kernel::Object* object = Kernel::g_object_pool.GetFast<Kernel::Object>(handle); Kernel::Object* object = Kernel::g_object_pool.GetFast<Kernel::Object>(handle);
_assert_msg_(KERNEL, (object != nullptr), "called, but kernel object is nullptr!"); _assert_msg_(KERNEL, (object != nullptr), "called, but kernel object is nullptr!");
DEBUG_LOG(SVC, "called handle=0x%08X(%s)", handle, object->GetTypeName()); DEBUG_LOG(SVC, "called handle=0x%08X(%s)", handle, object->GetTypeName());
bool wait = false;
Result res = object->SyncRequest(&wait); Result res = object->SyncRequest(&wait);
if (wait) { if (wait) {
Kernel::WaitCurrentThread(WAITTYPE_SYNCH); // TODO(bunnei): Is this correct? Kernel::WaitCurrentThread(WAITTYPE_SYNCH); // TODO(bunnei): Is this correct?