Summary: Add `ruby -wc` as a linter and raise Error whenever there's a syntax error
Test Plan: Just a few dumb unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3447
Summary:
See D945. We have this kludgy "remote_hooks_installed" mess right now, but we
have enough information on the server nowadays to figure this out without it.
Also reduce code duplication by sharing the "mark-committed" workflow.
This causes "arc merge" to effect commit marks.
Test Plan:
In Git, Mercurial and SVN working copies ran like a million
amend/merge/commit/mark-committed commands with and without --finalize in
various states of revision completion.
This change is really hard to exhaustively test because of the number of
combinations of VCS, revision state, command, command flags, repository state
and tracking state. All the reasonable tests I could come up with worked
correctly, though.
Reviewers: Makinde, jungejason, nh, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 967
Summary:
Right now, if you specify "/api" instead of "/api/" the entire world breaks in a
horrible way. Generally, this whole thing is silly. Just use the right path.
Test Plan:
Edited .arcconfig to use the "wrong" path, so this diff demonstrates the change
works.
Reviewed By: llorca
Reviewers: jungejason, llorca, aran, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, llorca, epriestley
Differential Revision: 506
Summary:
When you run one copy of arcanist against another copy, you previously got a
meaningless error. After D311 you get a slightly more meaningful error.
Capture the new exception and raise an extremely specific error.
NOTE: Adding arcanist to .arcconfig forces the library conflict error to
trigger; otherwise there's just an implicit conflict because 'arc' reads the
running-copy library amp instead of the working-copy library map. This only
worked before because arcanist includes itself.
Test Plan:
Ran arcanist on a different copy of arcanist, got a good error message.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 312
