revision is the correct base revision relative to the patch.
Summary: What the title says. If not correct, warn the user. This check
honors the --force flag to skip all these checks. This change also includes
moving some Differential constants into Arc so they can be used for both
projects. There is a corresponding phabricator diff (incoming) to address this
part of the change.
Test Plan:
For a project with actual diffs, a git repository tracked by phabricator, *AND*
development in master branch only, do some...
- git reset --hard HEAD^1
- arc patch DX, where X is what got us to HEAD in the first place
- verify successful patch
...then...
- git reset --hard HEAD^^
- arc patch DX, where X is what got us to HEAD in the first place
- verify warning
- verify Y versus N continues versus stops appropriately
Note if development were done outside the master branch this warning message
will fire early / often as git commit hashes are based on the commit *and* the
rest of the source code the commit is made against. This is (unfortunately) the
"typical" case so this warning is pretty active at the moment. T201 will
eventually land and when parsing a given commit update the corresponding diff.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, btrahan, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1328
Summary: adds a little bit of sanity checking to the arc patch workflow. in
short, if the working copy project is not the same as the patch project, don't
apply the patch
Test Plan:
ran
arc patch DX
arc patch DX --force
in the top line directory for project A and proejct B. DX is for project A.
verified for project A that the patch was applied and for project B i was issued
warnings as expected. also verified in project B case that saying Y or N to the
warning had the desired effect.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, btrahan, epriestley
Differential Revision: 1140
Summary:
D935 missed one place of parseGitRelativeCommit() in
ArcanistExportWorkflow.
Test Plan: ran arc export and verify that it worked.
Reviewers: epriestley, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: aran
CC: aran
Differential Revision: 1015
Summary:
I'm probably missing some edge cases but it took me almost 3 hours to get this
far and I think it only makes things work that didn't work before. Some stuff
like SVN binary patches still won't work, although they should be far easier to
implement.
Most of the magic here just comes from reading the git source code. It appears
to work correctly; I sprinkled printf() around git liberally and recompiled it
during development. Took me about 45 minutes to figure out that "Index" vs
"index" causes git to silently fail in a confusing way. :/
Git has a diff mode for binary changes but I don't think we lose much by always
using the full binaries. We can enhance it later if we want.
Test Plan:
Exported and patched binary changes (a picture of a duck) into a working copy.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: simpkins, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 327
