Summary:
In some workflows, we don't have Conduit at all, so we'll fail with a raw exception. Test for conduit presence before trying to make the encoding call.
Also move some "instanceof" logic for updates into RepositoryAPI (factoring, windows compat).
Test Plan: Ran "arc patch --patch some.patch".
Reviewers: 20after4, davidreuss, nh, btrahan
Reviewed By: 20after4
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1935
Summary:
Resolves crazy stuff like 'HEAD' or '{2001-01-01T01:01:01}' into an
actual revision, with a provided implementation for git.
Test Plan: Tested in a hacky script.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1849
Summary:
svn 1.7 no longer has a .svn directory in every subdirectory of the working
copy, only one in the root of the working copy (like git, except you can still
check out subtrees). Thus, we can't check whether we're in an svn repo by
looking for a .svn directory alongside the .arcconfig file.
Test Plan: ran arc diff in an svn 1.7 working copy where it previously wasn't working
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1848
Summary: good title
Test Plan: ran "arc patch DX" a bunch
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T892
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1789
Summary: This use of "(cd ..)" is outside of the RepositoryAPI proper (it's when we're trying to figure out which VCS a directory uses) and explodes on Windows.
Test Plan: @koolvin applied this patch manually and got farther than before.
Reviewers: btrahan, Koolvin, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T124
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1779
Summary:
- This is simpler and reuses more code than doing "(cd %s && ...)" every time.
- If we have an issue like HGPLAIN, we have one place to fix it now.
- On Windows, the construct "(cd %s && ...)" does not mean what we'd like it to.
Test Plan: Ran "arc diff" in a git repo with this change.
Reviewers: btrahan, Makinde
Reviewed By: Makinde
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T124
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1761
ArcanistRepositoryAPI->loadWorkingCopyDifferentialRevisions()
Summary:
- See T787.
- @cpiro has an immediate use case for this, which is ##arc amend --revision
`arc which --id` --show master## for "git merge --autosquash" or similar.
- For T614, we need this to choose "--create" vs "--update".
- Other workflows should also use this to improve how often we automatically
get things right, particularly in Mercurial and SVN.
Test Plan:
Ran "arc which" in SVN, Git and HG working copies with various flags;
results seemed reasonable.
Reviewers: btrahan, cpiro, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1478
Summary:
Currently, we throw a fairly perplexing error when there are multiple valid
commit messages. Installs can also remove the "test plan" field entirely, which
is the only really strong discriminator here.
When the message to use is ambiguous, show the user all the valid messages and
prompt them to choose one.
Also add a -C flag like "git commit -C", so they can choose a message
explicitly.
Test Plan: Ran "arc diff HEAD^^^^^", "arc diff -C <rev>".
Reviewers: cpiro, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: cpiro
CC: aran, cpiro
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1385
revision is the correct base revision relative to the patch.
Summary: What the title says. If not correct, warn the user. This check
honors the --force flag to skip all these checks. This change also includes
moving some Differential constants into Arc so they can be used for both
projects. There is a corresponding phabricator diff (incoming) to address this
part of the change.
Test Plan:
For a project with actual diffs, a git repository tracked by phabricator, *AND*
development in master branch only, do some...
- git reset --hard HEAD^1
- arc patch DX, where X is what got us to HEAD in the first place
- verify successful patch
...then...
- git reset --hard HEAD^^
- arc patch DX, where X is what got us to HEAD in the first place
- verify warning
- verify Y versus N continues versus stops appropriately
Note if development were done outside the master branch this warning message
will fire early / often as git commit hashes are based on the commit *and* the
rest of the source code the commit is made against. This is (unfortunately) the
"typical" case so this warning is pretty active at the moment. T201 will
eventually land and when parsing a given commit update the corresponding diff.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, btrahan, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1328
Summary: We ostensibly now support Mercurial at least mostly, so don't
underpromise quite so much.
Test Plan: Ran "arc diff" in a Mercurial working copy without being warned.
Reviewers: Makinde, jungejason, nh, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: Makinde
CC: aran, Makinde
Differential Revision: 1085
Summary:
This should support conservative rewrite policies in git fairly well, under an
assumed workflow of:
- Develop in local branches, never rewrite history.
- Commit with "-m" or by typing a brief, non-template commit message
describing the checkpoint.
- Provide rich information in the web console (reviewers, etc.)
- Finalize with "git checkout master && arc merge branch && git push" or some
flavor thereof.
This supports Mercurial somewhat. The major problem is that "hg merge" fails if
the local is a fastforward of the remote, at which point there's nowhere we can
throw the commit message. Oh well. Just push it and we'll do our best to link
them up based on local commit info.
I am increasingly forming an opinion that Mercurial is "saftey-scissors git".
But also maybe I have no clue what I'm doing. I just don't understand why anyone
would think it's a good idea to have a trunk consisting of ~50% known-broken
revisions, random checkpoint parts, whitespace changes, typo fixes, etc. If you
use git with branching you can avoid this by making a trunk out of merges or
with rebase/amend, but there seems to be no way to have "one commit = one idea"
in any real sense in Mercurial.
Test Plan: Execute "arc merge" in git and mercurial.
Reviewers: fratrik, Makinde, aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
Reviewed By: Makinde
CC: aran, epriestley, Makinde
Differential Revision: 860
Summary:
We have some git-specific logic on main pathways which should be in the API
class, move it around so "arc lint" with an engine works under Mercurial. This
resovles the error @makinde reported:
> PHP Catchable fatal error: Argument 1 passed to
ArcanistBaseWorkflow::parseGitRelativeCommit() must be an instance of
ArcanistGitAPI, instance of ArcanistMercurialAPI given, called in
/home/makinde/.arc_install/arcanist/src/workflow/lint/ArcanistLintWorkflow.php
on line 131 and defined in
/home/makinde/.arc_install/arcanist/src/workflow/base/ArcanistBaseWorkflow.php
on line 830
Test Plan: Ran "arc diff" in git and hg working copies, plus "arc lint" with a
configured "lint_engine".
Reviewers: Makinde, aran, jungejason, nh, tuomaspelkonen
Reviewed By: Makinde
CC: aran, Makinde
Differential Revision: 935
Summary: When a revision is created, attach relevant information about the local
commits which it came from if applicable. This supports T473, for DCVSes and
DCVS workflows with immutable history where we can't just amend commit messages.
It will also allow us to enrich the web interface.
Test Plan: Will verify this info shows up for this very diff.
Reviewers: fratrik, aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
Reviewed By: fratrik
CC: aran, epriestley, fratrik
Differential Revision: 857
Summary:
There's a lot of ground left to cover but this makes "arc diff" work (on one
trivial diff) in my sandbox, at least, and supports parsing of Mercurial native
diffs (which are unified + a custom header). Piles of missing features, still.
Some of this is blocked by me not understanding the mercurial model well yet.
This is also a really good opportunity for cleanup (especially, reducing the
level of "instanceof" in the diff workflow), I'll try to do a bunch of that in
followup diffs.
Test Plan: Ran "arc diff" in a mercurial repository, got a diff out of it.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: Makinde, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran, codeblock
CC: aran, epriestley, codeblock, fratrik
Differential Revision: 792
