Summary:
When an arcbundle includes a symlink, we fail to apply it correctly
when applying to a subversion working copy.
Test Plan:
created a diff which added a symlink, removed it locally, bundled
and applied the patch, got a good symlink out
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran
CC: epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: 63
Summary:
If you apply an arcbundle to a subversion working copy which adds
files in new subdirectories, we fail to create and add the parent directories
so the whole operation fails. Make sure we create and add any missing parent
directories before apply patches.
Test Plan:
Applied Facebook diff #542056 to www@rE349795 cleanly, while it
failed previously.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran
CC: aran
Differential Revision: 62
directories
Summary:
If you had changes to a directory covered by a .arcconfig residing
inside another directory also covered by an .arcconfig, the hook would
incorrectly attribute the first file it attempted to resolve to the topmost
.arcconfig because it failed to break out of the loop after resolving it.
All other files would be correctly attributed, because they'd hit the cache.
Test Plan:
Created an svn repository and checked it out locally. Created a
structure like this:
.arcconfig
shallow
a/
b/
c/
.arcconfig
d/
deep
deep2
deep3
Made modifications to "deep", "deep2", and "deep3". Received an error message
about multiple .arcconfig changes, attributing one file to the topmost
arcconfig and the other two to the deeper one.
Applied patch.
Commit now goes through. Made a commit affecting 'shallow' and 'deep' and
'deep2', commit was correctly blocked and files were attributed to the
corresponding .arcconfigs.
Reviewed By: mroch
Reviewers: mroch
CC: mroch
Differential Revision: 50
Summary: Haiping is getting a pretty confusing error message when trying to
commit.
Test Plan: Created a mock repository, installed the hook, made commits against
directories with bad .arcconfigs.
Reviewers:
CC:
Summary: When running "arc diff" in a mixed-base-revision working copy, we
prevent the operation. Relax this restriction so that having a different root
revision is okay, so long as all affected files share the same revision. This
facilitates multiple similar edits without updates.
Test Plan: Reverted a file to an older revision in an SVN working copy, ran
"arc diff", was rejected. Applied patch, ran "arc diff", diff went through and
was recorded with the right SVN base revision in the database.
Reviewers:
CC:
Summary: We sync from local right now, which is fairly terrible. But
fixing this correctly is also not trivial and I don't have the right
primitives yet.
Test Plan:
Reviewers:
CC:
Summary: The biggest blocker on getting rid of arc in trunk is that the lint
rules in the commit hooks are still running the old version. Push arc
commit hook support toward some reasonable state of approximately working.
Test Plan:
Reviewers:
CC:
Summary:
"-m ''" will still let you do a truly empty update if
you are insistent on that.
Test Plan:
meta
Differential Revision: 209194
Reviewed By: dschleimer
Reviewers: dschleimer
CC: epriestley
Revert Plan:
OK
Summary:
When you add new arguments to the unit command, they need to be
threaded through to the unit engine. This enables you to specify passthru
command which will be shipped through the callstack.
Test Plan:
Ran 'arc diff --maxtests 8 --apply-patches --trace' and verified
resulting behavior was correct.
Differential Revision: 207877
Reviewed By: dschleimer
Reviewers: dschleimer
CC: dschleimer
Revert Plan:
OK
Summary:
This should only happen on the 'diff' workflow.
Test Plan:
ran 'arc lint' and didn't get prompted to amend, ran 'arc diff' and got yelled
at for uncommitted changes, committed, ran 'arc diff' and got prompted to amend
Differential Revision: 206696
Reviewed By: adonohue
Reviewers: adonohue
CC: adonohue
Revert Plan:
OK
Summary:
Adds data-driven shell completion help to arcanist.
Test Plan:
ran various commands in git and svn working copies,
output seemed reasonable
Differential Revision: 201754
Reviewed By: adonohue
Reviewers: mroch, adonohue
Commenters: crackerjack
CC: epriestley, adonohue, achao
Revert Plan:
OK
Summary:
Be more clear about what happened.
Test Plan:
ran 'arc patch' on good/bad patches
Differential Revision: 201085
Reviewed By: adonohue
Reviewers: adonohue
CC: adonohue
Revert Plan:
OK
Summary: Send skipped lint warnings to Differential. This also fixes a nasty
bug with lint excluding too many warnings based on line changes.
Test Plan: meta
Reviewers:
CC:
Differential Revision: 200387
Summary: These flags let you force the behavior of 'arc lint' instead of
prompting. Also made the amend behavior default to false since I've screwed
this up about 300 times in the mere hours I've been using git as a primary VCS.
Test Plan: ran arc lint with these flags
Reviewers:
CC:
