Summary:
Our one Mercurial client doesn't use it (T614) and I moved git off to "arc
land".
This workflow can never work properly for Mercurial without extensions anyway
since it doesn't have --no-ff.
Test Plan: Ran "arc merge" in SVN, git and Mercurial repositories.
Reviewers: btrahan, Makinde
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T614
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1650
Summary:
I think "arc land" is better than "arc merge" in every case? Make "arc merge"
hg-only (possibly nuke it later, see T614) and point users at "arc land".
Add an explicit "--merge" flag to force --no-ff behavior in mutable reposiories.
Test Plan:
Ran "arc land --hold --merge <feature>" on this branch, got a clean
merge.
Reviewers: fratrik, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1647
Summary:
Mark all applicable Arcanist classes as "final", except PhutilLintEngine, which
needs a little finesse.
@jungejason / @nh, does this break any Facebook stuff?
Test Plan: Linter no longer raises warnings. Ran "testEverythingImplemented" in
Phabricator.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason, nh
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T795
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1519
Summary:
See D945. We have this kludgy "remote_hooks_installed" mess right now, but we
have enough information on the server nowadays to figure this out without it.
Also reduce code duplication by sharing the "mark-committed" workflow.
This causes "arc merge" to effect commit marks.
Test Plan:
In Git, Mercurial and SVN working copies ran like a million
amend/merge/commit/mark-committed commands with and without --finalize in
various states of revision completion.
This change is really hard to exhaustively test because of the number of
combinations of VCS, revision state, command, command flags, repository state
and tracking state. All the reasonable tests I could come up with worked
correctly, though.
Reviewers: Makinde, jungejason, nh, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 967
Summary:
This should support conservative rewrite policies in git fairly well, under an
assumed workflow of:
- Develop in local branches, never rewrite history.
- Commit with "-m" or by typing a brief, non-template commit message
describing the checkpoint.
- Provide rich information in the web console (reviewers, etc.)
- Finalize with "git checkout master && arc merge branch && git push" or some
flavor thereof.
This supports Mercurial somewhat. The major problem is that "hg merge" fails if
the local is a fastforward of the remote, at which point there's nowhere we can
throw the commit message. Oh well. Just push it and we'll do our best to link
them up based on local commit info.
I am increasingly forming an opinion that Mercurial is "saftey-scissors git".
But also maybe I have no clue what I'm doing. I just don't understand why anyone
would think it's a good idea to have a trunk consisting of ~50% known-broken
revisions, random checkpoint parts, whitespace changes, typo fixes, etc. If you
use git with branching you can avoid this by making a trunk out of merges or
with rebase/amend, but there seems to be no way to have "one commit = one idea"
in any real sense in Mercurial.
Test Plan: Execute "arc merge" in git and mercurial.
Reviewers: fratrik, Makinde, aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
Reviewed By: Makinde
CC: aran, epriestley, Makinde
Differential Revision: 860
