Summary:
See D945. We have this kludgy "remote_hooks_installed" mess right now, but we
have enough information on the server nowadays to figure this out without it.
Also reduce code duplication by sharing the "mark-committed" workflow.
This causes "arc merge" to effect commit marks.
Test Plan:
In Git, Mercurial and SVN working copies ran like a million
amend/merge/commit/mark-committed commands with and without --finalize in
various states of revision completion.
This change is really hard to exhaustively test because of the number of
combinations of VCS, revision state, command, command flags, repository state
and tracking state. All the reasonable tests I could come up with worked
correctly, though.
Reviewers: Makinde, jungejason, nh, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 967
Summary: I renamed this at some point but missed a callsite. See T519.
Test Plan: Ran "arc patch" in an SVN working copy.
Reviewers: Girish, jungejason
Reviewed By: Girish
CC: aran, Girish
Differential Revision: 959
Summary:
This should support conservative rewrite policies in git fairly well, under an
assumed workflow of:
- Develop in local branches, never rewrite history.
- Commit with "-m" or by typing a brief, non-template commit message
describing the checkpoint.
- Provide rich information in the web console (reviewers, etc.)
- Finalize with "git checkout master && arc merge branch && git push" or some
flavor thereof.
This supports Mercurial somewhat. The major problem is that "hg merge" fails if
the local is a fastforward of the remote, at which point there's nowhere we can
throw the commit message. Oh well. Just push it and we'll do our best to link
them up based on local commit info.
I am increasingly forming an opinion that Mercurial is "saftey-scissors git".
But also maybe I have no clue what I'm doing. I just don't understand why anyone
would think it's a good idea to have a trunk consisting of ~50% known-broken
revisions, random checkpoint parts, whitespace changes, typo fixes, etc. If you
use git with branching you can avoid this by making a trunk out of merges or
with rebase/amend, but there seems to be no way to have "one commit = one idea"
in any real sense in Mercurial.
Test Plan: Execute "arc merge" in git and mercurial.
Reviewers: fratrik, Makinde, aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
Reviewed By: Makinde
CC: aran, epriestley, Makinde
Differential Revision: 860
Summary:
We have some git-specific logic on main pathways which should be in the API
class, move it around so "arc lint" with an engine works under Mercurial. This
resovles the error @makinde reported:
> PHP Catchable fatal error: Argument 1 passed to
ArcanistBaseWorkflow::parseGitRelativeCommit() must be an instance of
ArcanistGitAPI, instance of ArcanistMercurialAPI given, called in
/home/makinde/.arc_install/arcanist/src/workflow/lint/ArcanistLintWorkflow.php
on line 131 and defined in
/home/makinde/.arc_install/arcanist/src/workflow/base/ArcanistBaseWorkflow.php
on line 830
Test Plan: Ran "arc diff" in git and hg working copies, plus "arc lint" with a
configured "lint_engine".
Reviewers: Makinde, aran, jungejason, nh, tuomaspelkonen
Reviewed By: Makinde
CC: aran, Makinde
Differential Revision: 935
Summary: When a revision is created, attach relevant information about the local
commits which it came from if applicable. This supports T473, for DCVSes and
DCVS workflows with immutable history where we can't just amend commit messages.
It will also allow us to enrich the web interface.
Test Plan: Will verify this info shows up for this very diff.
Reviewers: fratrik, aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
Reviewed By: fratrik
CC: aran, epriestley, fratrik
Differential Revision: 857
Summary:
SVN has a special 'replaced' status which was not being parsed
correctly. Parse it correctly.
Test Plan:
Replaced a file, ran arc diff, got a sensible diff.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran
CC: aran
Differential Revision: 60
Summary: Haiping is getting a pretty confusing error message when trying to
commit.
Test Plan: Created a mock repository, installed the hook, made commits against
directories with bad .arcconfigs.
Reviewers:
CC:
Summary: When running "arc diff" in a mixed-base-revision working copy, we
prevent the operation. Relax this restriction so that having a different root
revision is okay, so long as all affected files share the same revision. This
facilitates multiple similar edits without updates.
Test Plan: Reverted a file to an older revision in an SVN working copy, ran
"arc diff", was rejected. Applied patch, ran "arc diff", diff went through and
was recorded with the right SVN base revision in the database.
Reviewers:
CC:
