Summary:
In some workflows, we don't have Conduit at all, so we'll fail with a raw exception. Test for conduit presence before trying to make the encoding call.
Also move some "instanceof" logic for updates into RepositoryAPI (factoring, windows compat).
Test Plan: Ran "arc patch --patch some.patch".
Reviewers: 20after4, davidreuss, nh, btrahan
Reviewed By: 20after4
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1935
Summary:
In cases where a codebase is not UTF-8, we will attempt an conversion,
if an alternative encoding is given/configured.
This is now possible in two ways:
- by configuring one under repository tracking in diffusion
- by passing an --encoding option to the workflow
If the first is not available we will make a conduit call
to do an extra check and see if an encoding is configured directly with
phabricator.
Test Plan:
Tried various diffs with known encodings (mostly ISO-8859-1), and passed
it in, via stdin, or downloaded a known problematic revision from
phabricator, and they applied where they otherwise failed.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T452
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1880
Summary: Similar to rARC298ed9cda55d90b755e4dc45d202213e91631888, work around "differential.anonymous-access" issues until we get proper permissions up.
Test Plan: Ran "arc patch" against a "differential.anonymous-acccess" install with a revision argument
Reviewers: btrahan, mbautin
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T848
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1835
Summary: good title
Test Plan: ran "arc patch DX" a bunch
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T892
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1789
Summary: This may raise other types of exceptions, e.g. http/network exceptions, where getErrorCode() is not defined.
Test Plan: Reasoned about beahvior.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1804
Summary:
- When altering the include_path(), use PATH_SEPARATOR (";" on Windows, ":" elsewhere) instead of hard-coded ":".
- Detect missing php_curl.dll extension.
- Use APPDATA instead of HOME for storing .arcrc (the internet implies this is correct?)
- Don't try to do chmod() stuff on Windows; it's not critical and I don't want to figure out how it works.
Test Plan: Was able to run part of some arc commands on Windows.
Reviewers: btrahan, Makinde, Koolvin
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T124
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1756
Summary: 'cuz the method would fail without authentication! see D1604 for some
discussion on approaches here
Test Plan: ran arc patch and it worked
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, johnduhart
Maniphest Tasks: T856
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1645
Summary: T854 is hilarious. seriously, what are the odds?
Test Plan: ran arc patch a few times in a row with the same DX and verified
branches were made with expected, differing names
Reviewers: epriestley, fratrik
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T854
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1605
Summary:
- Renamed sanityCheckPatch to sanityCheck
- Move check for clean working copy into sanityCheck
- Execute sanityCheck before executing any other command
Test Plan:
- Run ##arc patch <revision id>## from a dirty working copy
and verify that a usage exception is thrown before the new branch is
created.
- Run ##arc patch <revision id> --force## and verify that it attempts
to create a new branch, apply, and commit the patch.
- Then clean your working copy and verify that ##arc patch <revision
id> works as expected
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T830, T479
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1546
Summary:
Check that the base revision is a valid git ref before trying to create a branch
starting at that rev. When arc patch is used in a git repo using the git-svn
bridge, the base reversion is a uri for the svn rev, not a git ref.
Test Plan:
run arc patch on a git-svn repo, run it on a pure git repo, and verify it works
for both
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
CC: jungejason, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1505
Summary:
under git, we now create a branch that is at the patch's base revision if we
know it or whatever the working copy happened to be at if we don't. This diff
also adds the --nobranch flag to disable this new behavior.
Also added an --update flag. When specified, we run the appropriate "update"
command in the VCS. By default this is off.
Finally, tried to give the user more information about what the heck arc just
did to their working copy.
Test Plan:
// verify --update flag works
// -- git
Assume we are at HEAD and we got to HEAD from HEAD^1 via DX
git reset --hard <THE BEGINNING>
arc patch --update DX
// ...versus svn
Assume we are at HEAD and we got to HEAD from HEAD^1 via DX
svn checkout -r 1
arc patch --update DX
// ...versus hg
Assume we are at HEAD and we got to HEAD from HEAD^1 via DX
hg update -r 1
arc patch --update DX
// verify under git a nice branch is made
// -- test where we should get a good name
// -- test where we have a base revision to check out the branch at
Assume we are at HEAD and we got to HEAD from HEAD^1 via DX
git reset --hard HEAD^1
arc patch DX
// verify under git an "okay" branch is made if we can't get "nice"
// -- test where we should get a "bad" name
// -- test where we DON'T have a base revision to check out the branch at
git diff HEAD^1 > ~/example.patch
git reset --hard HEAD^1
arc patch --patch ~/example.patch
// verify --nobranch flag skips the test for git
Assume we are at HEAD and we got to HEAD from HEAD^1 via DX
git reset --head HEAD^1
arc patch --nobranch DX
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T479
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1459
Summary:
without "nocommit" we commit the patch to the working copy. add the nocommit
flag and this commit does not happen.
making this happen required adding revisionID to arc bundle to fetch the proper
commit message. if we can't get a commit message -- suppose the fetch fails or
the source is self::SOURCE_PATCH, we ask the user for the commit message on the
command line
Test Plan:
git reset --hard <SOME_REV>
arc patch DX, where this got us to <SOME_REV + 1>
observe correct patch committed with correct commit message in working copy
git reset --hard <SOME_REV>
arc patch --nocommit DX, where this got us to <SOME_REV + 1>
observe correct patch landed BUT NOT committed. note "commit message" does not
exist since there isn't a commit...!
git diff HEAD^1 > ~/file.patch
git reset --hard HEAD^1
arc patch --patch ~/file.patch
observe prompted for commit message and patch committed with commit message i
typed in
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T479
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1450
Summary:
pretty easy stuff as mercurial accepts git style patches...!
also fixed two issues where we were 1) storing the short hash and 2) storing it
with a trailing "\n". This diff makes us store the full hash AND no trailing
return character
Test Plan:
in my mercurial repo
<note repo at revision $foo>
<did something dumb>
hg commit -m "something dumb"
arc diff
<go to web and fill out stuff for DX>
hg checkout $foo
arc patch DX
<verify patch DX successfully applied!>
use conduit console to verify a few diffs were returning the correct full
revision hash with a trailing \n
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T630
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1431
revision is the correct base revision relative to the patch.
Summary: What the title says. If not correct, warn the user. This check
honors the --force flag to skip all these checks. This change also includes
moving some Differential constants into Arc so they can be used for both
projects. There is a corresponding phabricator diff (incoming) to address this
part of the change.
Test Plan:
For a project with actual diffs, a git repository tracked by phabricator, *AND*
development in master branch only, do some...
- git reset --hard HEAD^1
- arc patch DX, where X is what got us to HEAD in the first place
- verify successful patch
...then...
- git reset --hard HEAD^^
- arc patch DX, where X is what got us to HEAD in the first place
- verify warning
- verify Y versus N continues versus stops appropriately
Note if development were done outside the master branch this warning message
will fire early / often as git commit hashes are based on the commit *and* the
rest of the source code the commit is made against. This is (unfortunately) the
"typical" case so this warning is pretty active at the moment. T201 will
eventually land and when parsing a given commit update the corresponding diff.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, btrahan, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1328
Summary: adds a little bit of sanity checking to the arc patch workflow. in
short, if the working copy project is not the same as the patch project, don't
apply the patch
Test Plan:
ran
arc patch DX
arc patch DX --force
in the top line directory for project A and proejct B. DX is for project A.
verified for project A that the patch was applied and for project B i was issued
warnings as expected. also verified in project B case that saying Y or N to the
warning had the desired effect.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, btrahan, epriestley
Differential Revision: 1140
Summary:
Allow `arc patch` without authentication if Phabricator instance has
'differential.anonymous-access' set to true.
Test Plan:
Set 'differential.anonymous-access' in Phabricator to true and run `arc patch`
without installing a certificate. `arc patch` should work as expected.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 1069
Summary:
I only dropped this because it's slightly inconvient to accommodate, but
empirically it's pretty confusing to users (who often use --diff 12345 when they
mean --revision 12345).
Test Plan:
Ran "arc patch D45", "arc patch --revision 45", "arc help patch"
Reviewed By: tuomaspelkonen
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: aran, tuomaspelkonen
Differential Revision: 241
Summary:
the current command to apply a git diff is 'git apply --index',
which will fail the whole patch and does not touch the working tree when
some of the hunks do not apply. We want to allow the user to patch the
ones which apply.
Test Plan:
run 'arc apply' against a diff whcih partially applies and
verify that the hunks which apply are applied, and .rej files are
generated for the rest.
Reviewed By: simpkins
Reviewers: simpkins, epriestley
Commenters: ju
CC: aran, slawekbiel, simpkins, ju
Differential Revision: 235
Summary:
Test Plan:
$ arc patch --diff 553961
Patch deletes file 'html/miniprofile.php', but the file does not exist in
the working copy. Continue anyway? [y/N] y
Patch deletes file 'html/index.php', but the file does not exist in the
working copy. Continue anyway? [y/N] y
OKAY Successfully applied patch to the working copy.
Reviewers:
CC:
Summary:
When an arcbundle includes a symlink, we fail to apply it correctly
when applying to a subversion working copy.
Test Plan:
created a diff which added a symlink, removed it locally, bundled
and applied the patch, got a good symlink out
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran
CC: epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: 63
Summary:
If you apply an arcbundle to a subversion working copy which adds
files in new subdirectories, we fail to create and add the parent directories
so the whole operation fails. Make sure we create and add any missing parent
directories before apply patches.
Test Plan:
Applied Facebook diff #542056 to www@rE349795 cleanly, while it
failed previously.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran
CC: aran
Differential Revision: 62
Summary:
Adds data-driven shell completion help to arcanist.
Test Plan:
ran various commands in git and svn working copies,
output seemed reasonable
Differential Revision: 201754
Reviewed By: adonohue
Reviewers: mroch, adonohue
Commenters: crackerjack
CC: epriestley, adonohue, achao
Revert Plan:
OK
Summary:
Be more clear about what happened.
Test Plan:
ran 'arc patch' on good/bad patches
Differential Revision: 201085
Reviewed By: adonohue
Reviewers: adonohue
CC: adonohue
Revert Plan:
OK
