Summary: Return `$this` from a bunch of setter methods for consistency. See also D13422.
Test Plan: Eyeball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13423
Summary:
Ref T7977. The `PhutilTestCase::getLink` method currently relies on arcanist projects instead of repositories. Instead, make this logic a bit smarter by looking up the base URI from `phabricator.uri` (currently it is hardcoded to `https://secure.phabricator.com`).
Ideally, we would pass `?repositories=$REPOSITORY_PHID` to `DiffusionSymbolController` as well, but I don't know if this is worth pursuing.
Test Plan: This diff.
Reviewers: avivey, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: avivey, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: aurelijus, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7977
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12664
Summary:
Ref T5655. It is superfluous to include "base" in the name of an abstract base class. Furthermore, it is not done consistently within the code base.
In order to retain compatibility with external code, I have kept the `ArcanistBaseWorkflow` class (which trivially extends from `ArcanistWorkflow`), but it is now deprecated and should output a warning message. Similarly for `ArcanistBaseUnitTestEngine`.
Test Plan: Created a workflow which extends from `ArcanistBaseWorkflow`. Executed the workflow and saw a deprecation warning.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, aurelijus
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9983
Summary: I'm pretty sure that `@group` annotations are useless now... I believe that they were originally used by Diviner?
Test Plan: Eye-balled it.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, aurelijus
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9855
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rARC, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.
Test Plan: Eyeballed //most// of the diff.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, aurelijus
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9269
Summary: This updates the C# tools unit test engine (the derived version of xUnit.NET test engine that supports code coverage) to work after the updates in D7594.
Test Plan:
Switched the test engine from 'XUnitTestEngine' to 'CSharpToolsTestEngine' and ran `arc unit --everything`. The results were identical except that code coverage was provided.
Tested on Linux; will update or comment based on whether it works on Windows as well.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7640
Summary: This just removes the `print "Discovered test .."` code in the xUnit.NET unit test engine. If users need to diagnose what tests are being debugged, it can be found out with `--trace` and observing what build commands are invoked.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit --everything` and didn't see the message any more.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7639
Summary: This fixes a few issues in the C# unit test engine. It fixes tests sitting in subdirectories not being tested correctly (the location of both the test assembly and the results file would be wrong). It also fixes a very strange issue where xUnit.NET seems to not output the resulting XML file when it executes; in this case we just retry running the test until the XML file appears after completion (and eventually it works).
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit --everything` and `arc unit --everything --no-coverage` and verified that it's all reliably working.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers, hach-que
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7594
Summary:
somewhat related to D7271 and D7377.
Not actually broken right now, but might be worth it for completeness.
Test Plan: arc unit invokes PHPUnit; Can't test Csharp/XUnit on my end.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aurelijus, Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7381
Summary:
This implements Arcanist support for the xUnit testing framework. It also supports code coverage by way of `cstools` (which is something I've written).
The unit test support works under both Linux and Windows, while the code coverage support has only been tested under Linux (one would assume it would also work under Windows given that Windows has a super-set of functionality in the C# world).
The Arcanist support assumes that the directory layout will be something like:
* MyProject
* MyProject.Tests
When files are changed in either MyProject or MyProject.Tests, it causes MyProject.Tests to be built and the xUnit runner to be executed on the resulting binary.
Test Plan: I guess if really wanted to, you could create a C# project in MonoDevelop, set up `.arcconfig` to point to this unit test engine, and download and build xUnit and cstools. Run `arc unit --coverage` to see the results of your unit test coverage.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3859
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7058
