Summary:
Ref T5655. It is superfluous to include "base" in the name of an abstract base class. Furthermore, it is not done consistently within the code base.
In order to retain compatibility with external code, I have kept the `ArcanistBaseWorkflow` class (which trivially extends from `ArcanistWorkflow`), but it is now deprecated and should output a warning message. Similarly for `ArcanistBaseUnitTestEngine`.
Test Plan: Created a workflow which extends from `ArcanistBaseWorkflow`. Executed the workflow and saw a deprecation warning.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, aurelijus
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9983
Summary: I'm pretty sure that `@group` annotations are useless now... I believe that they were originally used by Diviner?
Test Plan: Eye-balled it.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, aurelijus
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9855
Summary: Applied various linter fixes. Also make the `.editorconfig` file a bit more specific. Unfortunately, `arc lint --apply-patches` currently modifies some test data that it shouldn't, but this should be fixed after T5105.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit` to make sure things weren't broken.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, aurelijus
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9440
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rARC, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.
Test Plan: Eyeballed //most// of the diff.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, aurelijus
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9269
Summary:
I noticed that code coverage wasn't showing in Differential for
some repositories that we are using with Phabricator.
`arc unit` would should unit test coverage, but the paths were messy
(for example, `.//foo/bar.py` instead of `foo/bar.py`). As a result,
the code coverage info wasn't recognised as being for the correct
module.
I'm not sure why this logic is the way that it is... perhaps this is to
do with an older version of `nose` (I am using v1.3.0).
Test Plan:
I created a diff for an internal repository that we have, and
observed that code coverage was displayed in Differential.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran, seporaitis, avive, dctrwatson, zeeg
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8433
Summary:
In case that the $source_path is `.` or empty, it produces filenames that
look like `./foo.py`, which differential doesn't like.
Test Plan: arc diff, see coverage data.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7181
Summary:
Many test frameworks can format their output in xUnit-like format.
Test Plan: Tested the Nose engine with a Nose one, and the pytest with a demo project.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7011
Conflicts:
src/__phutil_library_map__.php
Summary:
The NoseTestEngine class has some usefull code for parsing nosetest, but it assumes a very specific code/test
layout. I've pulled this logic abit apart, which lets me reuse the nose-related parts with my existing
project layout, by having my custom engine just call runTests() with the relevant paths.
Test Plan: Run on a customized project with coverage, see coverage results.
Reviewers: epriestley, roman.barzyczak
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: seporaitis, aran, Korvin, zeeg
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5921
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in unit tests and LICENSE file.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan, edward
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, davidrecordon
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3881
