1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-12-01 11:12:42 +01:00
phorge-phorge/src/applications/base/PhabricatorApplication.php

295 lines
6.9 KiB
PHP
Raw Normal View History

<?php
/**
* @task info Application Information
* @task ui UI Integration
* @task uri URI Routing
* @task fact Fact Integration
* @task meta Application Management
* @group apps
*/
abstract class PhabricatorApplication {
const GROUP_CORE = 'core';
const GROUP_COMMUNICATION = 'communication';
const GROUP_ORGANIZATION = 'organization';
const GROUP_UTILITIES = 'util';
const GROUP_ADMIN = 'admin';
const GROUP_DEVELOPER = 'developer';
const GROUP_MISC = 'misc';
const TILE_INVISIBLE = 'invisible';
const TILE_HIDE = 'hide';
const TILE_SHOW = 'show';
const TILE_FULL = 'full';
public static function getApplicationGroups() {
return array(
self::GROUP_CORE => pht('Core Applications'),
self::GROUP_COMMUNICATION => pht('Communication'),
self::GROUP_ORGANIZATION => pht('Organization'),
self::GROUP_UTILITIES => pht('Utilities'),
self::GROUP_ADMIN => pht('Administration'),
self::GROUP_DEVELOPER => pht('Developer Tools'),
self::GROUP_MISC => pht('Miscellaneous Applications'),
);
}
public static function getTileDisplayName($constant) {
$names = array(
self::TILE_INVISIBLE => pht('Invisible'),
self::TILE_HIDE => pht('Hidden'),
self::TILE_SHOW => pht('Show Small Tile'),
self::TILE_FULL => pht('Show Large Tile'),
);
return idx($names, $constant);
}
/* -( Application Information )-------------------------------------------- */
public function getName() {
return substr(get_class($this), strlen('PhabricatorApplication'));
}
public function getShortDescription() {
return $this->getName().' Application';
}
public function isInstalled() {
if (!$this->canUninstall()) {
return true;
}
$beta = PhabricatorEnv::getEnvConfig('phabricator.show-beta-applications');
if (!$beta && $this->isBeta()) {
return false;
}
$uninstalled = PhabricatorEnv::getEnvConfig(
'phabricator.uninstalled-applications');
return empty($uninstalled[get_class($this)]);
}
public static function isClassInstalled($class) {
return self::getByClass($class)->isInstalled();
}
public function isBeta() {
return false;
}
public function canUninstall() {
return true;
}
public function getPHID() {
return 'PHID-APPS-'.get_class($this);
}
public function getTypeaheadURI() {
return $this->getBaseURI();
}
public function getBaseURI() {
return null;
}
public function getIconURI() {
return null;
}
public function getIconName() {
return 'application';
}
public function shouldAppearInLaunchView() {
return true;
}
public function getApplicationOrder() {
return PHP_INT_MAX;
}
public function getApplicationGroup() {
return self::GROUP_MISC;
}
public function getTitleGlyph() {
return null;
}
public function getHelpURI() {
// TODO: When these applications get created, link to their docs:
//
// - Drydock
// - OAuth Server
return null;
}
public function getEventListeners() {
return array();
}
public function getDefaultTileDisplay(PhabricatorUser $user) {
switch ($this->getApplicationGroup()) {
case self::GROUP_CORE:
return self::TILE_FULL;
case self::GROUP_UTILITIES:
case self::GROUP_DEVELOPER:
return self::TILE_HIDE;
case self::GROUP_ADMIN:
if ($user->getIsAdmin()) {
return self::TILE_SHOW;
} else {
return self::TILE_INVISIBLE;
}
break;
default:
return self::TILE_SHOW;
}
}
public function getRemarkupRules() {
return array();
}
/* -( URI Routing )-------------------------------------------------------- */
public function getRoutes() {
return array();
}
/* -( Fact Integration )--------------------------------------------------- */
public function getFactObjectsForAnalysis() {
return array();
}
/* -( UI Integration )----------------------------------------------------- */
/**
* Render status elements (like "3 Waiting Reviews") for application list
* views. These provide a way to alert users to new or pending action items
* in applications.
*
* @param PhabricatorUser Viewing user.
* @return list<PhabricatorApplicationStatusView> Application status elements.
* @task ui
*/
public function loadStatus(PhabricatorUser $user) {
return array();
}
/**
* You can provide an optional piece of flavor text for the application. This
* is currently rendered in application launch views if the application has no
* status elements.
*
* @return string|null Flavor text.
* @task ui
*/
public function getFlavorText() {
return null;
}
/**
* Build items for the main menu.
*
* @param PhabricatorUser The viewing user.
* @param AphrontController The current controller. May be null for special
* pages like 404, exception handlers, etc.
* @return list<PhabricatorMainMenuIconView> List of menu items.
* @task ui
*/
public function buildMainMenuItems(
PhabricatorUser $user,
PhabricatorController $controller = null) {
return array();
}
/**
* On the Phabricator homepage sidebar, this function returns the URL for
* a quick create X link which is displayed in the wide button only.
*
* @return string
* @task ui
*/
public function getQuickCreateURI() {
return null;
}
/* -( Application Management )--------------------------------------------- */
public static function getByClass($class_name) {
$selected = null;
$applications = PhabricatorApplication::getAllApplications();
foreach ($applications as $application) {
if (get_class($application) == $class_name) {
$selected = $application;
break;
}
}
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
if (!$selected) {
throw new Exception("No application '{$class_name}'!");
}
return $selected;
}
public static function getAllApplications() {
In unit test environments, install all applications Summary: Normalize the unit test environment by installing all applications. The immediate issue this fixes is that `testDropUnknownSenderMail` depends on Maniphest being installed. Some possible fixes are: # Don't rely on the Maniphest mail receiver for the test (e.g., write a stub/dummy/mock receiver). # Explicitly make sure Maniphest is installed before running the test. # Normalize the test environment to install all applications. I don't like (1) much because it turns a pretty good 10 line test into a bunch of stub classes or mock junk. I'll do it if we have more uses after a few more diffs, but so far running these tests against real code hasn't created a dependency mess and we get more coverage. I don't like (2) much because I think requiring tests to do this will do more harm than good. The number of issues we'll hypothetically uncover by exposing unrealized application interdependencies is probably very small or maybe zero, and they're probably all trivial. But tests with an undeclared but implicit dependency on an application (e.g., Differential tests depend on Differential) are common. So here's (3), which I think is reasonable. I also simplified some of this code a little bit, and moved the Application object cache one level down (this was sort of a bug -- installation status is variant across requests). Test Plan: Added unit test. Reviewers: wez, btrahan Reviewed By: wez CC: aran Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5938
2013-05-16 21:25:26 +02:00
static $applications;
In unit test environments, install all applications Summary: Normalize the unit test environment by installing all applications. The immediate issue this fixes is that `testDropUnknownSenderMail` depends on Maniphest being installed. Some possible fixes are: # Don't rely on the Maniphest mail receiver for the test (e.g., write a stub/dummy/mock receiver). # Explicitly make sure Maniphest is installed before running the test. # Normalize the test environment to install all applications. I don't like (1) much because it turns a pretty good 10 line test into a bunch of stub classes or mock junk. I'll do it if we have more uses after a few more diffs, but so far running these tests against real code hasn't created a dependency mess and we get more coverage. I don't like (2) much because I think requiring tests to do this will do more harm than good. The number of issues we'll hypothetically uncover by exposing unrealized application interdependencies is probably very small or maybe zero, and they're probably all trivial. But tests with an undeclared but implicit dependency on an application (e.g., Differential tests depend on Differential) are common. So here's (3), which I think is reasonable. I also simplified some of this code a little bit, and moved the Application object cache one level down (this was sort of a bug -- installation status is variant across requests). Test Plan: Added unit test. Reviewers: wez, btrahan Reviewed By: wez CC: aran Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5938
2013-05-16 21:25:26 +02:00
if ($applications === null) {
$apps = id(new PhutilSymbolLoader())
->setAncestorClass(__CLASS__)
->loadObjects();
In unit test environments, install all applications Summary: Normalize the unit test environment by installing all applications. The immediate issue this fixes is that `testDropUnknownSenderMail` depends on Maniphest being installed. Some possible fixes are: # Don't rely on the Maniphest mail receiver for the test (e.g., write a stub/dummy/mock receiver). # Explicitly make sure Maniphest is installed before running the test. # Normalize the test environment to install all applications. I don't like (1) much because it turns a pretty good 10 line test into a bunch of stub classes or mock junk. I'll do it if we have more uses after a few more diffs, but so far running these tests against real code hasn't created a dependency mess and we get more coverage. I don't like (2) much because I think requiring tests to do this will do more harm than good. The number of issues we'll hypothetically uncover by exposing unrealized application interdependencies is probably very small or maybe zero, and they're probably all trivial. But tests with an undeclared but implicit dependency on an application (e.g., Differential tests depend on Differential) are common. So here's (3), which I think is reasonable. I also simplified some of this code a little bit, and moved the Application object cache one level down (this was sort of a bug -- installation status is variant across requests). Test Plan: Added unit test. Reviewers: wez, btrahan Reviewed By: wez CC: aran Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5938
2013-05-16 21:25:26 +02:00
// Reorder the applications into "application order". Notably, this
// ensures their event handlers register in application order.
$apps = msort($apps, 'getApplicationOrder');
$apps = mgroup($apps, 'getApplicationGroup');
$apps = array_select_keys($apps, self::getApplicationGroups()) + $apps;
$apps = array_mergev($apps);
$applications = $apps;
}
In unit test environments, install all applications Summary: Normalize the unit test environment by installing all applications. The immediate issue this fixes is that `testDropUnknownSenderMail` depends on Maniphest being installed. Some possible fixes are: # Don't rely on the Maniphest mail receiver for the test (e.g., write a stub/dummy/mock receiver). # Explicitly make sure Maniphest is installed before running the test. # Normalize the test environment to install all applications. I don't like (1) much because it turns a pretty good 10 line test into a bunch of stub classes or mock junk. I'll do it if we have more uses after a few more diffs, but so far running these tests against real code hasn't created a dependency mess and we get more coverage. I don't like (2) much because I think requiring tests to do this will do more harm than good. The number of issues we'll hypothetically uncover by exposing unrealized application interdependencies is probably very small or maybe zero, and they're probably all trivial. But tests with an undeclared but implicit dependency on an application (e.g., Differential tests depend on Differential) are common. So here's (3), which I think is reasonable. I also simplified some of this code a little bit, and moved the Application object cache one level down (this was sort of a bug -- installation status is variant across requests). Test Plan: Added unit test. Reviewers: wez, btrahan Reviewed By: wez CC: aran Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5938
2013-05-16 21:25:26 +02:00
return $applications;
}
public static function getAllInstalledApplications() {
In unit test environments, install all applications Summary: Normalize the unit test environment by installing all applications. The immediate issue this fixes is that `testDropUnknownSenderMail` depends on Maniphest being installed. Some possible fixes are: # Don't rely on the Maniphest mail receiver for the test (e.g., write a stub/dummy/mock receiver). # Explicitly make sure Maniphest is installed before running the test. # Normalize the test environment to install all applications. I don't like (1) much because it turns a pretty good 10 line test into a bunch of stub classes or mock junk. I'll do it if we have more uses after a few more diffs, but so far running these tests against real code hasn't created a dependency mess and we get more coverage. I don't like (2) much because I think requiring tests to do this will do more harm than good. The number of issues we'll hypothetically uncover by exposing unrealized application interdependencies is probably very small or maybe zero, and they're probably all trivial. But tests with an undeclared but implicit dependency on an application (e.g., Differential tests depend on Differential) are common. So here's (3), which I think is reasonable. I also simplified some of this code a little bit, and moved the Application object cache one level down (this was sort of a bug -- installation status is variant across requests). Test Plan: Added unit test. Reviewers: wez, btrahan Reviewed By: wez CC: aran Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5938
2013-05-16 21:25:26 +02:00
$all_applications = self::getAllApplications();
$apps = array();
foreach ($all_applications as $app) {
if (!$app->isInstalled()) {
continue;
}
In unit test environments, install all applications Summary: Normalize the unit test environment by installing all applications. The immediate issue this fixes is that `testDropUnknownSenderMail` depends on Maniphest being installed. Some possible fixes are: # Don't rely on the Maniphest mail receiver for the test (e.g., write a stub/dummy/mock receiver). # Explicitly make sure Maniphest is installed before running the test. # Normalize the test environment to install all applications. I don't like (1) much because it turns a pretty good 10 line test into a bunch of stub classes or mock junk. I'll do it if we have more uses after a few more diffs, but so far running these tests against real code hasn't created a dependency mess and we get more coverage. I don't like (2) much because I think requiring tests to do this will do more harm than good. The number of issues we'll hypothetically uncover by exposing unrealized application interdependencies is probably very small or maybe zero, and they're probably all trivial. But tests with an undeclared but implicit dependency on an application (e.g., Differential tests depend on Differential) are common. So here's (3), which I think is reasonable. I also simplified some of this code a little bit, and moved the Application object cache one level down (this was sort of a bug -- installation status is variant across requests). Test Plan: Added unit test. Reviewers: wez, btrahan Reviewed By: wez CC: aran Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5938
2013-05-16 21:25:26 +02:00
$apps[] = $app;
}
In unit test environments, install all applications Summary: Normalize the unit test environment by installing all applications. The immediate issue this fixes is that `testDropUnknownSenderMail` depends on Maniphest being installed. Some possible fixes are: # Don't rely on the Maniphest mail receiver for the test (e.g., write a stub/dummy/mock receiver). # Explicitly make sure Maniphest is installed before running the test. # Normalize the test environment to install all applications. I don't like (1) much because it turns a pretty good 10 line test into a bunch of stub classes or mock junk. I'll do it if we have more uses after a few more diffs, but so far running these tests against real code hasn't created a dependency mess and we get more coverage. I don't like (2) much because I think requiring tests to do this will do more harm than good. The number of issues we'll hypothetically uncover by exposing unrealized application interdependencies is probably very small or maybe zero, and they're probably all trivial. But tests with an undeclared but implicit dependency on an application (e.g., Differential tests depend on Differential) are common. So here's (3), which I think is reasonable. I also simplified some of this code a little bit, and moved the Application object cache one level down (this was sort of a bug -- installation status is variant across requests). Test Plan: Added unit test. Reviewers: wez, btrahan Reviewed By: wez CC: aran Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5938
2013-05-16 21:25:26 +02:00
return $apps;
}
}