1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-15 11:22:40 +01:00
phorge-phorge/src/applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionDiffController.php

142 lines
3.8 KiB
PHP
Raw Normal View History

2011-03-31 02:36:16 +02:00
<?php
final class DiffusionDiffController extends DiffusionController {
2011-03-31 02:36:16 +02:00
public function shouldAllowPublic() {
return true;
}
protected function shouldLoadDiffusionRequest() {
return false;
}
protected function processDiffusionRequest(AphrontRequest $request) {
$data = $request->getURIMap();
Fix many encoding and architecture problems in Diffusion request and URI handling Summary: Diffusion request/uri handling is currently a big, hastily ported mess. In particular, it has: - Tons and tons of duplicated code. - Bugs with handling unusual branch and file names. - An excessively large (and yet insufficiently expressive) API on DiffusionRequest, including a nonsensical concrete base class. - Other tools were doing hacky things like passing ":" branch names. This diff attempts to fix these issues. - Make the base class abstract (it was concrete ONLY for "/diffusion/"). - Move all URI generation to DiffusionRequest. Make the core static. Add unit tests. - Delete the 300 copies of URI generation code throughout Diffusion. - Move all URI parsing to DiffusionRequest. Make the core static. Add unit tests. - Add an appropriate static initializer for other callers. - Convert all code calling `newFromAphrontRequestDictionary` outside of Diffusion to the new `newFromDictionary` API. - Refactor static initializers to be sensibly-sized. - Refactor derived DiffusionRequest classes to remove duplicated code. - Properly encode branch names (fixes branches with "/", see <https://github.com/facebook/phabricator/issues/100>). - Properly encode path names (fixes issues in D1742). - Properly escape delimiter characters ";" and "$" in path names so files like "$100" are not interpreted as "line 100". - Fix a couple warnings. - Fix a couple lint issues. - Fix a bug where we would not parse filenames with spaces in them correctly in the Git browse query. - Fix a bug where Git change queries would fail unnecessarily. - Provide or improve some documentation. This thing is pretty gigantic but also kind of hard to split up. If it's unreasonably difficult to review, let me know and I can take a stab at it though. This supplants D1742. Test Plan: - Used home, repository, branch, browse, change, history, diff (ajax), lastmodified (ajax) views of Diffusion. - Used Owners typeaheads and search. - Used diffusion.getrecentcommitsbypath method. - Pushed a change to an absurdly-named file on an absurdly-named branch, everything worked properly. {F9185} Reviewers: nh, vrana, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, epriestley Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1921
2012-03-20 03:52:14 +01:00
$data = $data + array(
'dblob' => $this->getRequest()->getStr('ref'),
);
try {
$drequest = DiffusionRequest::newFromAphrontRequestDictionary(
$data,
$request);
} catch (Exception $ex) {
return id(new Aphront404Response())
->setRequest($request);
}
$this->setDiffusionRequest($drequest);
2011-03-31 02:36:16 +02:00
$drequest = $this->getDiffusionRequest();
Track a "Done" state on inline comments Summary: Ref T1460. This just barely works, but throwing it up in case any of it sounds mechanically crazy before we build integrations/UI/etc. Specifically, these are the behaviors: - You can mark your own draft comments as "done" before you submit them. The intent is to let reviewers mark their stuff advisory/minor/not-important before they submit it, to hint to authors that they don't expect the feedback to necessarily be addressed (maybe it's a joke, maybe it's just discussion, maybe it's "consider.."). - You can mark others' published comments as "done" if you're the revision/commit author. The intent is to keep this lightweight by not requiring an audit trail of who marked what done when. If anyone could mark anything done, we'd have to have some way to show who marked stuff. - When you mark stuff done (or unmark it), it goes into a "draft" state, where you see the change but others don't see it yet. The intent is twofold: - Be consistent with how inlines work. - Allow us to publish a "epriestley updated this revision + epriestley marked 15 inlines as done" story later if we want. This seems more useful than publishing 15 "epriestley marked one thing as done" stories. - The actual bit where done-ness publishes isn't implemented. - UI is bare bones. - No integration with the rest of the UI yet. Test Plan: Clicked some checkboxes. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: paulshen, chasemp, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T1460 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12033
2015-03-10 02:41:47 +01:00
$viewer = $this->getViewer();
2011-03-31 02:36:16 +02:00
if (!$request->isAjax()) {
// This request came out of the dropdown menu, either "View Standalone"
// or "View Raw File".
$view = $request->getStr('view');
if ($view == 'r') {
$uri = $drequest->generateURI(
array(
'action' => 'browse',
'params' => array(
'view' => 'raw',
),
));
} else {
$uri = $drequest->generateURI(
array(
'action' => 'change',
));
}
return id(new AphrontRedirectResponse())->setURI($uri);
}
$data = $this->callConduitWithDiffusionRequest(
'diffusion.diffquery',
array(
'commit' => $drequest->getCommit(),
'path' => $drequest->getPath(),
));
$drequest->updateSymbolicCommit($data['effectiveCommit']);
$raw_changes = ArcanistDiffChange::newFromConduit($data['changes']);
$diff = DifferentialDiff::newEphemeralFromRawChanges(
$raw_changes);
$changesets = $diff->getChangesets();
$changeset = reset($changesets);
2011-03-31 02:36:16 +02:00
if (!$changeset) {
return new Aphront404Response();
}
$parser = new DifferentialChangesetParser();
Track a "Done" state on inline comments Summary: Ref T1460. This just barely works, but throwing it up in case any of it sounds mechanically crazy before we build integrations/UI/etc. Specifically, these are the behaviors: - You can mark your own draft comments as "done" before you submit them. The intent is to let reviewers mark their stuff advisory/minor/not-important before they submit it, to hint to authors that they don't expect the feedback to necessarily be addressed (maybe it's a joke, maybe it's just discussion, maybe it's "consider.."). - You can mark others' published comments as "done" if you're the revision/commit author. The intent is to keep this lightweight by not requiring an audit trail of who marked what done when. If anyone could mark anything done, we'd have to have some way to show who marked stuff. - When you mark stuff done (or unmark it), it goes into a "draft" state, where you see the change but others don't see it yet. The intent is twofold: - Be consistent with how inlines work. - Allow us to publish a "epriestley updated this revision + epriestley marked 15 inlines as done" story later if we want. This seems more useful than publishing 15 "epriestley marked one thing as done" stories. - The actual bit where done-ness publishes isn't implemented. - UI is bare bones. - No integration with the rest of the UI yet. Test Plan: Clicked some checkboxes. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: paulshen, chasemp, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T1460 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12033
2015-03-10 02:41:47 +01:00
$parser->setUser($viewer);
2011-03-31 02:36:16 +02:00
$parser->setChangeset($changeset);
$parser->setRenderingReference($drequest->generateURI(
array(
'action' => 'rendering-ref',
)));
$parser->readParametersFromRequest($request);
$coverage = $drequest->loadCoverage();
if ($coverage) {
$parser->setCoverage($coverage);
}
Track a "Done" state on inline comments Summary: Ref T1460. This just barely works, but throwing it up in case any of it sounds mechanically crazy before we build integrations/UI/etc. Specifically, these are the behaviors: - You can mark your own draft comments as "done" before you submit them. The intent is to let reviewers mark their stuff advisory/minor/not-important before they submit it, to hint to authors that they don't expect the feedback to necessarily be addressed (maybe it's a joke, maybe it's just discussion, maybe it's "consider.."). - You can mark others' published comments as "done" if you're the revision/commit author. The intent is to keep this lightweight by not requiring an audit trail of who marked what done when. If anyone could mark anything done, we'd have to have some way to show who marked stuff. - When you mark stuff done (or unmark it), it goes into a "draft" state, where you see the change but others don't see it yet. The intent is twofold: - Be consistent with how inlines work. - Allow us to publish a "epriestley updated this revision + epriestley marked 15 inlines as done" story later if we want. This seems more useful than publishing 15 "epriestley marked one thing as done" stories. - The actual bit where done-ness publishes isn't implemented. - UI is bare bones. - No integration with the rest of the UI yet. Test Plan: Clicked some checkboxes. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: paulshen, chasemp, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T1460 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12033
2015-03-10 02:41:47 +01:00
$commit = $drequest->loadCommit();
$pquery = new DiffusionPathIDQuery(array($changeset->getFilename()));
$ids = $pquery->loadPathIDs();
$path_id = $ids[$changeset->getFilename()];
$parser->setLeftSideCommentMapping($path_id, false);
$parser->setRightSideCommentMapping($path_id, true);
Track a "Done" state on inline comments Summary: Ref T1460. This just barely works, but throwing it up in case any of it sounds mechanically crazy before we build integrations/UI/etc. Specifically, these are the behaviors: - You can mark your own draft comments as "done" before you submit them. The intent is to let reviewers mark their stuff advisory/minor/not-important before they submit it, to hint to authors that they don't expect the feedback to necessarily be addressed (maybe it's a joke, maybe it's just discussion, maybe it's "consider.."). - You can mark others' published comments as "done" if you're the revision/commit author. The intent is to keep this lightweight by not requiring an audit trail of who marked what done when. If anyone could mark anything done, we'd have to have some way to show who marked stuff. - When you mark stuff done (or unmark it), it goes into a "draft" state, where you see the change but others don't see it yet. The intent is twofold: - Be consistent with how inlines work. - Allow us to publish a "epriestley updated this revision + epriestley marked 15 inlines as done" story later if we want. This seems more useful than publishing 15 "epriestley marked one thing as done" stories. - The actual bit where done-ness publishes isn't implemented. - UI is bare bones. - No integration with the rest of the UI yet. Test Plan: Clicked some checkboxes. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: paulshen, chasemp, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T1460 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12033
2015-03-10 02:41:47 +01:00
$parser->setCanMarkDone(
($commit->getAuthorPHID()) &&
($viewer->getPHID() == $commit->getAuthorPHID()));
2011-03-31 02:36:16 +02:00
$parser->setWhitespaceMode(
DifferentialChangesetParser::WHITESPACE_SHOW_ALL);
$inlines = PhabricatorAuditInlineComment::loadDraftAndPublishedComments(
Track a "Done" state on inline comments Summary: Ref T1460. This just barely works, but throwing it up in case any of it sounds mechanically crazy before we build integrations/UI/etc. Specifically, these are the behaviors: - You can mark your own draft comments as "done" before you submit them. The intent is to let reviewers mark their stuff advisory/minor/not-important before they submit it, to hint to authors that they don't expect the feedback to necessarily be addressed (maybe it's a joke, maybe it's just discussion, maybe it's "consider.."). - You can mark others' published comments as "done" if you're the revision/commit author. The intent is to keep this lightweight by not requiring an audit trail of who marked what done when. If anyone could mark anything done, we'd have to have some way to show who marked stuff. - When you mark stuff done (or unmark it), it goes into a "draft" state, where you see the change but others don't see it yet. The intent is twofold: - Be consistent with how inlines work. - Allow us to publish a "epriestley updated this revision + epriestley marked 15 inlines as done" story later if we want. This seems more useful than publishing 15 "epriestley marked one thing as done" stories. - The actual bit where done-ness publishes isn't implemented. - UI is bare bones. - No integration with the rest of the UI yet. Test Plan: Clicked some checkboxes. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: paulshen, chasemp, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T1460 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12033
2015-03-10 02:41:47 +01:00
$viewer,
$commit->getPHID(),
$path_id);
if ($inlines) {
foreach ($inlines as $inline) {
$parser->parseInlineComment($inline);
}
$phids = mpull($inlines, 'getAuthorPHID');
$handles = $this->loadViewerHandles($phids);
$parser->setHandles($handles);
}
$engine = new PhabricatorMarkupEngine();
Track a "Done" state on inline comments Summary: Ref T1460. This just barely works, but throwing it up in case any of it sounds mechanically crazy before we build integrations/UI/etc. Specifically, these are the behaviors: - You can mark your own draft comments as "done" before you submit them. The intent is to let reviewers mark their stuff advisory/minor/not-important before they submit it, to hint to authors that they don't expect the feedback to necessarily be addressed (maybe it's a joke, maybe it's just discussion, maybe it's "consider.."). - You can mark others' published comments as "done" if you're the revision/commit author. The intent is to keep this lightweight by not requiring an audit trail of who marked what done when. If anyone could mark anything done, we'd have to have some way to show who marked stuff. - When you mark stuff done (or unmark it), it goes into a "draft" state, where you see the change but others don't see it yet. The intent is twofold: - Be consistent with how inlines work. - Allow us to publish a "epriestley updated this revision + epriestley marked 15 inlines as done" story later if we want. This seems more useful than publishing 15 "epriestley marked one thing as done" stories. - The actual bit where done-ness publishes isn't implemented. - UI is bare bones. - No integration with the rest of the UI yet. Test Plan: Clicked some checkboxes. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: paulshen, chasemp, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T1460 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12033
2015-03-10 02:41:47 +01:00
$engine->setViewer($viewer);
foreach ($inlines as $inline) {
$engine->addObject(
$inline,
PhabricatorInlineCommentInterface::MARKUP_FIELD_BODY);
}
$engine->process();
$parser->setMarkupEngine($engine);
$spec = $request->getStr('range');
list($range_s, $range_e, $mask) =
DifferentialChangesetParser::parseRangeSpecification($spec);
$parser->setRange($range_s, $range_e);
$parser->setMask($mask);
2011-03-31 02:36:16 +02:00
return id(new PhabricatorChangesetResponse())
->setRenderedChangeset($parser->renderChangeset())
->setUndoTemplates($parser->getRenderer()->renderUndoTemplates());
2011-03-31 02:36:16 +02:00
}
}