1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-14 10:52:41 +01:00
phorge-phorge/webroot/rsrc/js/application/differential/DifferentialInlineCommentEditor.js

357 lines
9.4 KiB
JavaScript
Raw Normal View History

/**
* @provides differential-inline-comment-editor
* @requires javelin-dom
* javelin-util
* javelin-stratcom
* javelin-install
* javelin-request
* javelin-workflow
*/
JX.install('DifferentialInlineCommentEditor', {
construct : function(uri) {
this._uri = uri;
},
events : ['done'],
members : {
_uri : null,
_undoText : null,
_completed: false,
_skipOverInlineCommentRows : function(node) {
// TODO: Move this semantic information out of class names.
while (node && node.className.indexOf('inline') !== -1) {
node = node.nextSibling;
}
return node;
},
_buildRequestData : function() {
return {
op : this.getOperation(),
on_right : this.getOnRight(),
id : this.getID(),
number : this.getLineNumber(),
is_new : this.getIsNew(),
length : this.getLength(),
changesetID : this.getChangesetID(),
text : this.getText() || '',
renderer: this.getRenderer(),
replyToCommentPHID: this.getReplyToCommentPHID() || '',
};
},
_draw : function(content, exact_row) {
var row = this.getRow();
var table = this.getTable();
var target = exact_row ? row : this._skipOverInlineCommentRows(row);
function copyRows(dst, src, before) {
var rows = JX.DOM.scry(src, 'tr');
for (var ii = 0; ii < rows.length; ii++) {
// Find the table this <tr /> belongs to. If it's a sub-table, like a
// table in an inline comment, don't copy it.
if (JX.DOM.findAbove(rows[ii], 'table') !== src) {
continue;
}
if (before) {
dst.insertBefore(rows[ii], before);
} else {
dst.appendChild(rows[ii]);
}
}
return rows;
}
return copyRows(table, content, target);
},
_removeUndoLink : function() {
var rows = JX.DifferentialInlineCommentEditor._undoRows;
if (rows) {
for (var ii = 0; ii < rows.length; ii++) {
JX.DOM.remove(rows[ii]);
}
}
JX.DifferentialInlineCommentEditor._undoRows = [];
},
_undo : function() {
this._removeUndoLink();
if (this._undoText) {
this.setText(this._undoText);
} else {
this.setOperation('undelete');
}
this.start();
},
_registerUndoListener : function() {
if (!JX.DifferentialInlineCommentEditor._activeEditor) {
JX.Stratcom.listen(
'click',
'differential-inline-comment-undo',
function(e) {
JX.DifferentialInlineCommentEditor._activeEditor._undo();
e.kill();
});
}
JX.DifferentialInlineCommentEditor._activeEditor = this;
},
_setRowState : function(state) {
var is_hidden = (state == 'hidden');
var is_loading = (state == 'loading');
var row = this.getRow();
JX.DOM.alterClass(row, 'differential-inline-hidden', is_hidden);
JX.DOM.alterClass(row, 'differential-inline-loading', is_loading);
},
_didContinueWorkflow : function(response) {
Don't mangle inline comments with tables in them in Differential Summary: Fixes T3814. Broadly, remarkup tables in inline comments did not work properly. I ran into several messes here and cleaned up some of them: - Some of this code is doing `JX.$N('div', {}, JX.$H(response.markup))`, to turn an HTML response into a node, passing that around, and then doing junk with it. This is super old and gross. - The slightly more modern pattern is `JX.$H(response.markup).getFragment().firstChild`, but this is kind of yuck too and not as safe as it could be. - Introduce `JX.$H(response.markup).getNode()`, which actually expresses intent here. We have a bunch of `getFragment().firstChild` callsites which should switch to this, but I didn't clean those up yet because I don't want to test them all. - Switch the `JX.$N('div', {}, JX.$H(response.markup))`-style callsites to `JX.$H(response.markup).getNode()`. - `copyRows()` is too aggressive in finding `<tr />` tags. This actually causes the bug in T3814. We only want to find these tags at top level, not all tags. Don't copy `<tr />` tags which belong to some deeper table. - Once this is fixed, there's another bug with mousing over the cells in tables in inline comments. We select the nearest `<td />`, but that's the cell in the remarkup table. Instead, select the correct `<td />`. - At this point, these last two callsites were looking ugly. I provided `findAbove()` to clean them up. Test Plan: Created, edited, deleted, moused over, and reloaded a revision with inline comments including remarkup tables. Used "Show more context" links. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T3814 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6924
2013-09-11 00:31:32 +02:00
var drawn = this._draw(JX.$H(response).getNode());
var op = this.getOperation();
if (op == 'edit') {
this._setRowState('hidden');
}
JX.DOM.find(
drawn[0],
'textarea',
'differential-inline-comment-edit-textarea').focus();
var oncancel = JX.bind(this, function(e) {
e.kill();
this._didCancelWorkflow();
if (op == 'edit') {
this._setRowState('visible');
}
JX.DOM.remove(drawn[0]);
});
JX.DOM.listen(drawn[0], 'click', 'inline-edit-cancel', oncancel);
var onsubmit = JX.bind(this, function(e) {
e.kill();
JX.Workflow.newFromForm(e.getTarget())
.setHandler(JX.bind(this, function(response) {
JX.DOM.remove(drawn[0]);
if (op == 'edit') {
this._setRowState('visible');
}
this._didCompleteWorkflow(response);
}))
.start();
JX.DOM.alterClass(drawn[0], 'differential-inline-loading', true);
});
JX.DOM.listen(
drawn[0],
['submit', 'didSyntheticSubmit'],
'inline-edit-form',
onsubmit);
},
_didCompleteWorkflow : function(response) {
var op = this.getOperation();
// We don't get any markup back if the user deletes a comment, or saves
// an empty comment (which effects a delete).
if (response.markup) {
this._draw(JX.$H(response.markup).getNode());
}
if (op == 'delete' || op == 'refdelete') {
this._undoText = null;
this._drawUndo();
} else {
this._removeUndoLink();
}
// These operations remove the old row (edit adds a new row first).
var remove_old = (op == 'edit' || op == 'delete' || op == 'refdelete');
if (remove_old) {
this._setRowState('hidden');
}
if (op == 'undelete') {
this._setRowState('visible');
}
this._completed = true;
JX.Stratcom.invoke('differential-inline-comment-update');
this.invoke('done');
},
_didCancelWorkflow : function() {
this.invoke('done');
switch (this.getOperation()) {
case 'delete':
case 'refdelete':
if (!this._completed) {
this._setRowState('visible');
}
return;
case 'undelete':
return;
}
var textarea;
try {
textarea = JX.DOM.find(
document.body, // TODO: use getDialogRootNode() when available
'textarea',
'differential-inline-comment-edit-textarea');
} catch (ex) {
// The close handler is called whenever the dialog closes, even if the
// user closed it by completing the workflow with "Save". The
// JX.Workflow API should probably be refined to allow programmatic
// distinction of close caused by 'cancel' vs 'submit'. Testing for
// presence of the textarea serves as a proxy for detecting a 'cancel'.
return;
}
var text = textarea.value;
// If the user hasn't edited the text (i.e., no change from original for
// 'edit' or no text at all), don't offer them an undo.
if (text == this.getOriginalText() || text === '') {
return;
}
// Save the text so we can 'undo' back to it.
this._undoText = text;
this._drawUndo();
},
_drawUndo: function() {
var templates = this.getTemplates();
var template = this.getOnRight() ? templates.r : templates.l;
Don't mangle inline comments with tables in them in Differential Summary: Fixes T3814. Broadly, remarkup tables in inline comments did not work properly. I ran into several messes here and cleaned up some of them: - Some of this code is doing `JX.$N('div', {}, JX.$H(response.markup))`, to turn an HTML response into a node, passing that around, and then doing junk with it. This is super old and gross. - The slightly more modern pattern is `JX.$H(response.markup).getFragment().firstChild`, but this is kind of yuck too and not as safe as it could be. - Introduce `JX.$H(response.markup).getNode()`, which actually expresses intent here. We have a bunch of `getFragment().firstChild` callsites which should switch to this, but I didn't clean those up yet because I don't want to test them all. - Switch the `JX.$N('div', {}, JX.$H(response.markup))`-style callsites to `JX.$H(response.markup).getNode()`. - `copyRows()` is too aggressive in finding `<tr />` tags. This actually causes the bug in T3814. We only want to find these tags at top level, not all tags. Don't copy `<tr />` tags which belong to some deeper table. - Once this is fixed, there's another bug with mousing over the cells in tables in inline comments. We select the nearest `<td />`, but that's the cell in the remarkup table. Instead, select the correct `<td />`. - At this point, these last two callsites were looking ugly. I provided `findAbove()` to clean them up. Test Plan: Created, edited, deleted, moused over, and reloaded a revision with inline comments including remarkup tables. Used "Show more context" links. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T3814 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6924
2013-09-11 00:31:32 +02:00
template = JX.$H(template).getNode();
// NOTE: Operation order matters here; we can't remove anything until
// after we draw the new rows because _draw uses the old rows to figure
// out where to place the comment.
// We use 'exact_row' to put the "undo" text directly above the affected
// comment.
var exact_row = true;
var rows = this._draw(template, exact_row);
this._removeUndoLink();
JX.DifferentialInlineCommentEditor._undoRows = rows;
},
start : function() {
this._registerUndoListener();
var data = this._buildRequestData();
var op = this.getOperation();
if (op == 'delete' || op == 'refdelete' || op == 'undelete') {
this._setRowState('loading');
var oncomplete = JX.bind(this, this._didCompleteWorkflow);
var oncancel = JX.bind(this, this._didCancelWorkflow);
new JX.Workflow(this._uri, data)
.setHandler(oncomplete)
.setCloseHandler(oncancel)
.start();
} else {
var handler = JX.bind(this, this._didContinueWorkflow);
if (op == 'edit') {
this._setRowState('loading');
}
new JX.Request(this._uri, handler)
.setData(data)
.send();
}
return this;
},
deleteByID: function(id) {
var data = {
op: 'refdelete',
Track a "Done" state on inline comments Summary: Ref T1460. This just barely works, but throwing it up in case any of it sounds mechanically crazy before we build integrations/UI/etc. Specifically, these are the behaviors: - You can mark your own draft comments as "done" before you submit them. The intent is to let reviewers mark their stuff advisory/minor/not-important before they submit it, to hint to authors that they don't expect the feedback to necessarily be addressed (maybe it's a joke, maybe it's just discussion, maybe it's "consider.."). - You can mark others' published comments as "done" if you're the revision/commit author. The intent is to keep this lightweight by not requiring an audit trail of who marked what done when. If anyone could mark anything done, we'd have to have some way to show who marked stuff. - When you mark stuff done (or unmark it), it goes into a "draft" state, where you see the change but others don't see it yet. The intent is twofold: - Be consistent with how inlines work. - Allow us to publish a "epriestley updated this revision + epriestley marked 15 inlines as done" story later if we want. This seems more useful than publishing 15 "epriestley marked one thing as done" stories. - The actual bit where done-ness publishes isn't implemented. - UI is bare bones. - No integration with the rest of the UI yet. Test Plan: Clicked some checkboxes. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: paulshen, chasemp, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T1460 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12033
2015-03-10 02:41:47 +01:00
id: id
};
new JX.Workflow(this._uri, data)
Track a "Done" state on inline comments Summary: Ref T1460. This just barely works, but throwing it up in case any of it sounds mechanically crazy before we build integrations/UI/etc. Specifically, these are the behaviors: - You can mark your own draft comments as "done" before you submit them. The intent is to let reviewers mark their stuff advisory/minor/not-important before they submit it, to hint to authors that they don't expect the feedback to necessarily be addressed (maybe it's a joke, maybe it's just discussion, maybe it's "consider.."). - You can mark others' published comments as "done" if you're the revision/commit author. The intent is to keep this lightweight by not requiring an audit trail of who marked what done when. If anyone could mark anything done, we'd have to have some way to show who marked stuff. - When you mark stuff done (or unmark it), it goes into a "draft" state, where you see the change but others don't see it yet. The intent is twofold: - Be consistent with how inlines work. - Allow us to publish a "epriestley updated this revision + epriestley marked 15 inlines as done" story later if we want. This seems more useful than publishing 15 "epriestley marked one thing as done" stories. - The actual bit where done-ness publishes isn't implemented. - UI is bare bones. - No integration with the rest of the UI yet. Test Plan: Clicked some checkboxes. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: paulshen, chasemp, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T1460 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12033
2015-03-10 02:41:47 +01:00
.setHandler(JX.bind(this, function() {
this._didUpdate();
}))
.start();
Track a "Done" state on inline comments Summary: Ref T1460. This just barely works, but throwing it up in case any of it sounds mechanically crazy before we build integrations/UI/etc. Specifically, these are the behaviors: - You can mark your own draft comments as "done" before you submit them. The intent is to let reviewers mark their stuff advisory/minor/not-important before they submit it, to hint to authors that they don't expect the feedback to necessarily be addressed (maybe it's a joke, maybe it's just discussion, maybe it's "consider.."). - You can mark others' published comments as "done" if you're the revision/commit author. The intent is to keep this lightweight by not requiring an audit trail of who marked what done when. If anyone could mark anything done, we'd have to have some way to show who marked stuff. - When you mark stuff done (or unmark it), it goes into a "draft" state, where you see the change but others don't see it yet. The intent is twofold: - Be consistent with how inlines work. - Allow us to publish a "epriestley updated this revision + epriestley marked 15 inlines as done" story later if we want. This seems more useful than publishing 15 "epriestley marked one thing as done" stories. - The actual bit where done-ness publishes isn't implemented. - UI is bare bones. - No integration with the rest of the UI yet. Test Plan: Clicked some checkboxes. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: paulshen, chasemp, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T1460 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12033
2015-03-10 02:41:47 +01:00
},
toggleCheckbox: function(id, checkbox) {
var data = {
op: 'done',
id: id
};
new JX.Workflow(this._uri, data)
.setHandler(JX.bind(this, function(r) {
Track a "Done" state on inline comments Summary: Ref T1460. This just barely works, but throwing it up in case any of it sounds mechanically crazy before we build integrations/UI/etc. Specifically, these are the behaviors: - You can mark your own draft comments as "done" before you submit them. The intent is to let reviewers mark their stuff advisory/minor/not-important before they submit it, to hint to authors that they don't expect the feedback to necessarily be addressed (maybe it's a joke, maybe it's just discussion, maybe it's "consider.."). - You can mark others' published comments as "done" if you're the revision/commit author. The intent is to keep this lightweight by not requiring an audit trail of who marked what done when. If anyone could mark anything done, we'd have to have some way to show who marked stuff. - When you mark stuff done (or unmark it), it goes into a "draft" state, where you see the change but others don't see it yet. The intent is twofold: - Be consistent with how inlines work. - Allow us to publish a "epriestley updated this revision + epriestley marked 15 inlines as done" story later if we want. This seems more useful than publishing 15 "epriestley marked one thing as done" stories. - The actual bit where done-ness publishes isn't implemented. - UI is bare bones. - No integration with the rest of the UI yet. Test Plan: Clicked some checkboxes. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: paulshen, chasemp, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T1460 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12033
2015-03-10 02:41:47 +01:00
checkbox.checked = !checkbox.checked;
var comment = JX.DOM.findAbove(
checkbox,
'div',
'differential-inline-comment');
JX.DOM.alterClass(comment, 'inline-is-done', !!checkbox.checked);
JX.DOM.alterClass(comment, 'inline-state-is-draft', r.draftState);
Track a "Done" state on inline comments Summary: Ref T1460. This just barely works, but throwing it up in case any of it sounds mechanically crazy before we build integrations/UI/etc. Specifically, these are the behaviors: - You can mark your own draft comments as "done" before you submit them. The intent is to let reviewers mark their stuff advisory/minor/not-important before they submit it, to hint to authors that they don't expect the feedback to necessarily be addressed (maybe it's a joke, maybe it's just discussion, maybe it's "consider.."). - You can mark others' published comments as "done" if you're the revision/commit author. The intent is to keep this lightweight by not requiring an audit trail of who marked what done when. If anyone could mark anything done, we'd have to have some way to show who marked stuff. - When you mark stuff done (or unmark it), it goes into a "draft" state, where you see the change but others don't see it yet. The intent is twofold: - Be consistent with how inlines work. - Allow us to publish a "epriestley updated this revision + epriestley marked 15 inlines as done" story later if we want. This seems more useful than publishing 15 "epriestley marked one thing as done" stories. - The actual bit where done-ness publishes isn't implemented. - UI is bare bones. - No integration with the rest of the UI yet. Test Plan: Clicked some checkboxes. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: paulshen, chasemp, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T1460 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12033
2015-03-10 02:41:47 +01:00
this._didUpdate();
}))
.start();
},
_didUpdate: function() {
JX.Stratcom.invoke('differential-inline-comment-update');
}
},
statics : {
/**
* Global refernece to the 'undo' rows currently rendered in the document.
*/
_undoRows : null,
/**
* Global listener for the 'undo' click associated with the currently
* displayed 'undo' link. When an editor is start()ed, it becomes the active
* editor.
*/
_activeEditor : null
},
properties : {
operation : null,
row : null,
table : null,
onRight : null,
ID : null,
lineNumber : null,
changesetID : null,
length : null,
isNew : null,
text : null,
templates : null,
originalText : null,
renderer: null,
replyToCommentPHID: null
}
});