revi-archive/phorge-phorge
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-10 17:02:41 +01:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
phorge-phorge/resources/sql/autopatches/20190207.packages.02.migrate.sql

3 lines
106 B
MySQL
Raw Normal View History

Prepare owners package audit rules to become more flexible Summary: Ref T13244. See PHI1055. (Earlier, see D20091 and PHI1047.) Previously, we expanded the Owners package autoreview rules from "Yes/No" to several "Review (Blocking) If Non-Owner Author Not Subscribed via Package" kinds of rules. The sky didn't fall and this feature didn't turn into "Herald-in-Owners", so I'm comfortable doing something similar to the "Audit" rules. PHI1055 is a request for a way to configure slightly different audit behavior, and expanding the options seems like a good approach to satisfy the use case. Prepare to add more options by moving everything into a class that defines all the behavior of different states, and converting the "0/1" boolean column to a text column. Test Plan: - Created several packages, some with and some without auditing. - Inspected database for: package state; and associated transactions. - Ran the migrations. - Inspected database to confirm that state and transactions migrated correctly. - Reviewed transaction logs. - Created and edited packages and audit state. - Viewed the "Package List" element in Diffusion. - Pulled package information with `owners.search`, got sensible results. - Edited package audit status with `owners.edit`. Reviewers: amckinley Reviewed By: amckinley Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam Maniphest Tasks: T13244 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20124
2019-02-07 17:00:43 +01:00
UPDATE {$NAMESPACE}_owners.owners_package
SET auditingState = IF(auditingEnabled = 0, 'none', 'audit');
Copy permalink