1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-09-21 01:38:48 +02:00
phorge-phorge/src/infrastructure/__tests__/PhabricatorInfrastructureTestCase.php

82 lines
2.3 KiB
PHP
Raw Normal View History

<?php
final class PhabricatorInfrastructureTestCase
extends PhabricatorTestCase {
protected function getPhabricatorTestCaseConfiguration() {
return array(
self::PHABRICATOR_TESTCONFIG_BUILD_STORAGE_FIXTURES => true,
);
}
/**
* This is more of an acceptance test case instead of a unittest. It verifies
In unit test environments, install all applications Summary: Normalize the unit test environment by installing all applications. The immediate issue this fixes is that `testDropUnknownSenderMail` depends on Maniphest being installed. Some possible fixes are: # Don't rely on the Maniphest mail receiver for the test (e.g., write a stub/dummy/mock receiver). # Explicitly make sure Maniphest is installed before running the test. # Normalize the test environment to install all applications. I don't like (1) much because it turns a pretty good 10 line test into a bunch of stub classes or mock junk. I'll do it if we have more uses after a few more diffs, but so far running these tests against real code hasn't created a dependency mess and we get more coverage. I don't like (2) much because I think requiring tests to do this will do more harm than good. The number of issues we'll hypothetically uncover by exposing unrealized application interdependencies is probably very small or maybe zero, and they're probably all trivial. But tests with an undeclared but implicit dependency on an application (e.g., Differential tests depend on Differential) are common. So here's (3), which I think is reasonable. I also simplified some of this code a little bit, and moved the Application object cache one level down (this was sort of a bug -- installation status is variant across requests). Test Plan: Added unit test. Reviewers: wez, btrahan Reviewed By: wez CC: aran Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5938
2013-05-16 21:25:26 +02:00
* that all symbols can be loaded correctly. It can catch problems like
* missing methods in descendants of abstract base classes.
*/
public function testEverythingImplemented() {
In unit test environments, install all applications Summary: Normalize the unit test environment by installing all applications. The immediate issue this fixes is that `testDropUnknownSenderMail` depends on Maniphest being installed. Some possible fixes are: # Don't rely on the Maniphest mail receiver for the test (e.g., write a stub/dummy/mock receiver). # Explicitly make sure Maniphest is installed before running the test. # Normalize the test environment to install all applications. I don't like (1) much because it turns a pretty good 10 line test into a bunch of stub classes or mock junk. I'll do it if we have more uses after a few more diffs, but so far running these tests against real code hasn't created a dependency mess and we get more coverage. I don't like (2) much because I think requiring tests to do this will do more harm than good. The number of issues we'll hypothetically uncover by exposing unrealized application interdependencies is probably very small or maybe zero, and they're probably all trivial. But tests with an undeclared but implicit dependency on an application (e.g., Differential tests depend on Differential) are common. So here's (3), which I think is reasonable. I also simplified some of this code a little bit, and moved the Application object cache one level down (this was sort of a bug -- installation status is variant across requests). Test Plan: Added unit test. Reviewers: wez, btrahan Reviewed By: wez CC: aran Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5938
2013-05-16 21:25:26 +02:00
id(new PhutilSymbolLoader())->selectAndLoadSymbols();
}
In unit test environments, install all applications Summary: Normalize the unit test environment by installing all applications. The immediate issue this fixes is that `testDropUnknownSenderMail` depends on Maniphest being installed. Some possible fixes are: # Don't rely on the Maniphest mail receiver for the test (e.g., write a stub/dummy/mock receiver). # Explicitly make sure Maniphest is installed before running the test. # Normalize the test environment to install all applications. I don't like (1) much because it turns a pretty good 10 line test into a bunch of stub classes or mock junk. I'll do it if we have more uses after a few more diffs, but so far running these tests against real code hasn't created a dependency mess and we get more coverage. I don't like (2) much because I think requiring tests to do this will do more harm than good. The number of issues we'll hypothetically uncover by exposing unrealized application interdependencies is probably very small or maybe zero, and they're probably all trivial. But tests with an undeclared but implicit dependency on an application (e.g., Differential tests depend on Differential) are common. So here's (3), which I think is reasonable. I also simplified some of this code a little bit, and moved the Application object cache one level down (this was sort of a bug -- installation status is variant across requests). Test Plan: Added unit test. Reviewers: wez, btrahan Reviewed By: wez CC: aran Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5938
2013-05-16 21:25:26 +02:00
public function testApplicationsInstalled() {
$all = PhabricatorApplication::getAllApplications();
$installed = PhabricatorApplication::getAllInstalledApplications();
$this->assertEqual(
count($all),
count($installed),
'In test cases, all applications should default to installed.');
}
public function testMySQLAgreesWithUsAboutBMP() {
// Build a string with every BMP character in it, then insert it into MySQL
// and read it back. We expect to get the same string out that we put in,
// demonstrating that strings which pass our BMP checks are also valid in
// MySQL and no silent data truncation will occur.
$buf = '';
for ($ii = 0x01; $ii <= 0x7F; $ii++) {
$buf .= chr($ii);
}
for ($ii = 0xC2; $ii <= 0xDF; $ii++) {
for ($jj = 0x80; $jj <= 0xBF; $jj++) {
$buf .= chr($ii).chr($jj);
}
}
// NOTE: This is \xE0\xA0\xZZ.
for ($ii = 0xE0; $ii <= 0xE0; $ii++) {
for ($jj = 0xA0; $jj <= 0xBF; $jj++) {
for ($kk = 0x80; $kk <= 0xBF; $kk++) {
$buf .= chr($ii).chr($jj).chr($kk);
}
}
}
// NOTE: This is \xE1\xZZ\xZZ through \xEF\xZZ\xZZ.
for ($ii = 0xE1; $ii <= 0xEF; $ii++) {
for ($jj = 0x80; $jj <= 0xBF; $jj++) {
for ($kk = 0x80; $kk <= 0xBF; $kk++) {
$buf .= chr($ii).chr($jj).chr($kk);
}
}
}
$this->assertEqual(194431, strlen($buf));
$this->assertEqual(true, phutil_is_utf8_with_only_bmp_characters($buf));
$write = id(new HarbormasterScratchTable())
->setData('all.utf8.bmp')
->setBigData($buf)
->save();
$read = id(new HarbormasterScratchTable())->load($write->getID());
$this->assertEqual($buf, $read->getBigData());
}
In unit test environments, install all applications Summary: Normalize the unit test environment by installing all applications. The immediate issue this fixes is that `testDropUnknownSenderMail` depends on Maniphest being installed. Some possible fixes are: # Don't rely on the Maniphest mail receiver for the test (e.g., write a stub/dummy/mock receiver). # Explicitly make sure Maniphest is installed before running the test. # Normalize the test environment to install all applications. I don't like (1) much because it turns a pretty good 10 line test into a bunch of stub classes or mock junk. I'll do it if we have more uses after a few more diffs, but so far running these tests against real code hasn't created a dependency mess and we get more coverage. I don't like (2) much because I think requiring tests to do this will do more harm than good. The number of issues we'll hypothetically uncover by exposing unrealized application interdependencies is probably very small or maybe zero, and they're probably all trivial. But tests with an undeclared but implicit dependency on an application (e.g., Differential tests depend on Differential) are common. So here's (3), which I think is reasonable. I also simplified some of this code a little bit, and moved the Application object cache one level down (this was sort of a bug -- installation status is variant across requests). Test Plan: Added unit test. Reviewers: wez, btrahan Reviewed By: wez CC: aran Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5938
2013-05-16 21:25:26 +02:00
}