phorge-phorge/resources/sql/patches/124.subpriority.sql

ALTER TABLE {$NAMESPACE}_maniphest.maniphest_task
  ADD subpriority DOUBLE NOT NULL;

ALTER TABLE {$NAMESPACE}_maniphest.maniphest_task
  ADD KEY (priority, subpriority);

/* Seed the subpriority column with reasonable values that keep order stable. */
UPDATE {$NAMESPACE}_maniphest.maniphest_task
  SET subpriority = (UNIX_TIMESTAMP() - dateModified);
SQL Patch Management: SQL Changes Summary: Splits out the SQL changes. These are most of the changes, but primarily mechanical: - Moved "initialize.sql" to "0000.legacy.sql" and partially reverted to an older version, such that patches 0000 + 000 + 001 + ... + 137 put us in the right state when applied sequentially. - Removed "create database" commands from all SQL. These are handled by separate DB patches now, so we have the data to do operations like "storage databases" (list databases) and "storage destroy" (drop databases). - Removed "phabricator_" namespace from all SQL, and replaced with "{$NAMESPACE}_" token so we can namespace databases. - Shortened some column lengths so patches apply correctly if originally created as InnoDB; also a few similar tweaks elsewhere. Test Plan: See D2323 for discussion and test plan. Reviewers: edward, vrana, btrahan, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T140, T345 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2329 2012-04-30 07:53:53 -07:00			`ALTER TABLE {$NAMESPACE}_maniphest.maniphest_task`
Allow tasks to be subprioritized by drag-and-drop Summary: Like the title says, similar to Facebook Tasks. Not sure how I really feel about this, but I guess it's kind of OK? I never used this feature in Facebook Tasks but I think some people like it. The drag-and-drop to repri across priorities feels okayish. Because subpriority is a double and we just split the difference when reprioritizing, you lose ~a bit of precision every time you repri two tasks against each other and so you can break it by swapping the priorities of two tasks ~50 times. This case is pretty silly and pathological. We can add some code to deal with this at some point if necessary. I think this also fixes the whacky task layout widths once and for all. (There are a couple of minor UI glitches like headers not vanishing and header counts not updating that I'm not fixing because I am lazy.) Test Plan: Dragged and dropped tasks around. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, epriestley, mgummelt Maniphest Tasks: T859 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1731 2012-04-02 12:12:04 -07:00			`ADD subpriority DOUBLE NOT NULL;`

SQL Patch Management: SQL Changes Summary: Splits out the SQL changes. These are most of the changes, but primarily mechanical: - Moved "initialize.sql" to "0000.legacy.sql" and partially reverted to an older version, such that patches 0000 + 000 + 001 + ... + 137 put us in the right state when applied sequentially. - Removed "create database" commands from all SQL. These are handled by separate DB patches now, so we have the data to do operations like "storage databases" (list databases) and "storage destroy" (drop databases). - Removed "phabricator_" namespace from all SQL, and replaced with "{$NAMESPACE}_" token so we can namespace databases. - Shortened some column lengths so patches apply correctly if originally created as InnoDB; also a few similar tweaks elsewhere. Test Plan: See D2323 for discussion and test plan. Reviewers: edward, vrana, btrahan, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T140, T345 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2329 2012-04-30 07:53:53 -07:00			`ALTER TABLE {$NAMESPACE}_maniphest.maniphest_task`
Allow tasks to be subprioritized by drag-and-drop Summary: Like the title says, similar to Facebook Tasks. Not sure how I really feel about this, but I guess it's kind of OK? I never used this feature in Facebook Tasks but I think some people like it. The drag-and-drop to repri across priorities feels okayish. Because subpriority is a double and we just split the difference when reprioritizing, you lose ~a bit of precision every time you repri two tasks against each other and so you can break it by swapping the priorities of two tasks ~50 times. This case is pretty silly and pathological. We can add some code to deal with this at some point if necessary. I think this also fixes the whacky task layout widths once and for all. (There are a couple of minor UI glitches like headers not vanishing and header counts not updating that I'm not fixing because I am lazy.) Test Plan: Dragged and dropped tasks around. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, epriestley, mgummelt Maniphest Tasks: T859 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1731 2012-04-02 12:12:04 -07:00			`ADD KEY (priority, subpriority);`

			`/* Seed the subpriority column with reasonable values that keep order stable. */`
SQL Patch Management: SQL Changes Summary: Splits out the SQL changes. These are most of the changes, but primarily mechanical: - Moved "initialize.sql" to "0000.legacy.sql" and partially reverted to an older version, such that patches 0000 + 000 + 001 + ... + 137 put us in the right state when applied sequentially. - Removed "create database" commands from all SQL. These are handled by separate DB patches now, so we have the data to do operations like "storage databases" (list databases) and "storage destroy" (drop databases). - Removed "phabricator_" namespace from all SQL, and replaced with "{$NAMESPACE}_" token so we can namespace databases. - Shortened some column lengths so patches apply correctly if originally created as InnoDB; also a few similar tweaks elsewhere. Test Plan: See D2323 for discussion and test plan. Reviewers: edward, vrana, btrahan, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T140, T345 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2329 2012-04-30 07:53:53 -07:00			`UPDATE {$NAMESPACE}_maniphest.maniphest_task`
Minor, subpriority default previously reverse ordered eveything Auditors: btrahan 2012-04-02 12:26:50 -07:00			`SET subpriority = (UNIX_TIMESTAMP() - dateModified);`
Allow tasks to be subprioritized by drag-and-drop Summary: Like the title says, similar to Facebook Tasks. Not sure how I really feel about this, but I guess it's kind of OK? I never used this feature in Facebook Tasks but I think some people like it. The drag-and-drop to repri across priorities feels okayish. Because subpriority is a double and we just split the difference when reprioritizing, you lose ~a bit of precision every time you repri two tasks against each other and so you can break it by swapping the priorities of two tasks ~50 times. This case is pretty silly and pathological. We can add some code to deal with this at some point if necessary. I think this also fixes the whacky task layout widths once and for all. (There are a couple of minor UI glitches like headers not vanishing and header counts not updating that I'm not fixing because I am lazy.) Test Plan: Dragged and dropped tasks around. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, epriestley, mgummelt Maniphest Tasks: T859 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1731 2012-04-02 12:12:04 -07:00