mirror of
https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git
synced 2024-12-13 17:16:14 +01:00
190 lines
8.2 KiB
Text
190 lines
8.2 KiB
Text
|
@title Contributing Feature Requests
|
||
|
@group detail
|
||
|
|
||
|
Describes how to file an effective Phabricator feature request.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Overview
|
||
|
========
|
||
|
|
||
|
Have a feature you'd like to see in Phabricator? This article describes how
|
||
|
to file an effective feature request.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The most important things to do are:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- understand the upstream;
|
||
|
- make sure your feature makes sense in the project;
|
||
|
- align your expectations around timelines and priorities;
|
||
|
- describe your problem, not your solution; and
|
||
|
- file a task in
|
||
|
[[ http://secure.phabricator.com/maniphest/task/create/ | Maniphest ]].
|
||
|
|
||
|
The rest of this article walks through these points in detail.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you have a bug report (not a feature request), see
|
||
|
@{article:Contributing Bug Reports} for a more tailored guide.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For general information on contributing to Phabricator, see
|
||
|
@{article:Contributor Introduction}.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Understanding the Upstream
|
||
|
==========================
|
||
|
|
||
|
Before filing a feature request, it may be useful to understand how the
|
||
|
upstream operates.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The Phabricator upstream is [[ https://www.phacility.com | Phacility, Inc ]].
|
||
|
We maintain total control over the project and roadmap. There is no democratic
|
||
|
process, voting, or community-driven decision making. This model is better
|
||
|
at some things and worse at others than a more community-focused model would
|
||
|
be, but it is the model we operate under.
|
||
|
|
||
|
We have a cohesive vision for the project in the long term, and a general
|
||
|
roadmap that extends for years into the future. While the specifics of how
|
||
|
we get there are flexible, many major milestones are well-established.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Although we set project direction, the community is also a critical part of
|
||
|
Phabricator. We aren't all-knowing, and we rely on feedback to help us identify
|
||
|
issues, guide product direction, prioritize changes, and suggest features.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Feature requests are an important part of this, but we ultimately build only
|
||
|
features which make sense as part of the long term plan.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Since it's hard to absorb a detailed understanding of that vision, //describing
|
||
|
a problem// is often more effective than //requesting a feature//. We have the
|
||
|
context to develop solutions which fit into our plans, address similar use
|
||
|
cases, make sense with the available infrastructure, and work within the
|
||
|
boundaries of our product vision. For more details on this, see below.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Target Audiences
|
||
|
================
|
||
|
|
||
|
Some feature requests support very unusual use cases. Although we are broadly
|
||
|
inclusive of many different kinds of users and use cases, we are not trying
|
||
|
to make the software all things to all users. Use cases which are far afield
|
||
|
from the things the majority of users do with Phabricator often face substantial
|
||
|
barriers.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Phabricator is primarily targeted at software projects and organizations with
|
||
|
a heavy software focus. We are most likely to design, build, and prioritize
|
||
|
features which serve these organizations and projects.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Phabricator is primarily targeted at software professionals and other
|
||
|
professionals with adjacent responsibilities (like project management and
|
||
|
operations). Particularly, we assume users are proficient computer users and
|
||
|
familiar with software development concepts. We are most likely to design, build
|
||
|
and prioritize features which serve these users.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Phabricator is primarily targeted at professionals working in teams on full-time
|
||
|
projects. Particularly, we assume most users will use the software regularly and
|
||
|
are often willing to spend a little more time up front to get a more efficient
|
||
|
workflow in the long run. We are most likely to design, build and prioritize
|
||
|
features which serve these use cases.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Phabricator is not limited to these kinds of organizations, users and use cases,
|
||
|
but features which are aimed at a different group of users (like students,
|
||
|
casual projects, or inexperienced computer users) may be harder to get
|
||
|
upstreamed. Features aimed at very different groups of users (like wedding
|
||
|
planners, book clubs, or dogs) will be much harder to get upstreamed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
In many cases, a feature makes something better for all users. For example,
|
||
|
suppose we fixed an issue where colorblind users had difficulty doing something.
|
||
|
Dogs would benefit the most, but colorblind human users would also benefit, and
|
||
|
no one would be worse off. If the benefit for core users is very small these
|
||
|
kinds of features may be hard to prioritize, but there is no exceptional barrier
|
||
|
to getting them upstreamed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
In other cases, a feature makes something better for some users and worse for
|
||
|
other users. These kinds of features face a high barrier if they make the
|
||
|
software better at planning weddings and worse at reviewing code.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Setting Expectations
|
||
|
====================
|
||
|
|
||
|
We have a lot of users and a small team. Even if your feature is something we're
|
||
|
interested in and a good fit for where we want the product to go, it may take
|
||
|
us a long time to get around to building it.
|
||
|
|
||
|
We work full time on Phabricator, and our long-term roadmap has many years worth
|
||
|
of work. Your feature request is competing against thousands of other requests
|
||
|
for priority.
|
||
|
|
||
|
In general, we try to prioritize work that will have the greatest impact on the
|
||
|
most users. Many feature requests are perfectly reasonable requests, but have
|
||
|
very little impact, impact only a few users, and/or are complex to develop and
|
||
|
support relative to their impact. It can take us a long time to get to these.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Even if your feature request is simple and has substantial impact for a large
|
||
|
number of users, the size of the request queue means that it is mathematically
|
||
|
unlikely to be near the top.
|
||
|
|
||
|
You can find some information about how we prioritize in T4778. In particular,
|
||
|
we reprioritize frequently and can not accurately predict when we'll build a
|
||
|
feature which isn't very near to top of the queue.
|
||
|
|
||
|
As a whole, this means that the overwhelming majority of feature requests will
|
||
|
sit in queue for a long time without any updates, and that we won't be able to
|
||
|
give you any updates or predictions about timelines. One day, out of nowhere,
|
||
|
your feature will materialize. That day may be a decade from now. You should
|
||
|
have realistic expectations about this when filing a feature request.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you want a concrete timeline, you can build the feature yourself. See
|
||
|
@{article:Contributing Code} for details and alternatives to working with the
|
||
|
upstream.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Describe Problems
|
||
|
=================
|
||
|
|
||
|
When you file a feature request, it is really helpful to describe the problem
|
||
|
you're facing first, not just your desired solution.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Often, your problem may have a lot in common with other similar problems. If we
|
||
|
understand your use case we can compare it to other use cases and sometimes find
|
||
|
a more powerful or more general solution which solves several problems at once.
|
||
|
|
||
|
At other times, we'll have a planned solution to the problem that might be
|
||
|
different from your desired solution but accomplish the same goal. Understanding
|
||
|
the root issue can let us merge and contextualize things.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Sometimes there's already a way to solve your problem that might just not be
|
||
|
obvious.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Finally, your proposed solution may not be compatible with the direction we
|
||
|
want to take the product, but we may be able to come up with another solution
|
||
|
which has approximately the same effect and does fit into the product direction.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you only describe the solution and not the problem, we can't generalize,
|
||
|
contextualize, merge, reframe, or offer alternative solutions or workarounds.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Create a Task in Maniphest
|
||
|
==========================
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you think your feature might be a good fit for the upstream, have reasonable
|
||
|
expectations about it, and have a good description of the problem you're trying
|
||
|
to solve, you're ready to file a feature request:
|
||
|
|
||
|
https://secure.phabricator.com/maniphest/task/create/
|
||
|
|
||
|
You can file feature requests in places other than Maniphest (like GitHub), but
|
||
|
we can address them far more effectively if you file them in the upstream.
|
||
|
Feature requests filed elsewhere will generally be moved to the upstream.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you have a quick question or want to discuss something before filing a
|
||
|
request, IRC is a great way to get a quick answer. You can find information
|
||
|
about IRC and other support channels in @{article: Give Feedback! Get Support!}.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Next Steps
|
||
|
==========
|
||
|
|
||
|
Continue by:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- learning about @{article: Contributing Bug Reports}; or
|
||
|
- reading general support information in
|
||
|
@{article: Give Feedback! Get Support!}; or
|
||
|
- returning to the @{article:Contributor Introduction}.
|