1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-30 10:42:41 +01:00
phorge-phorge/src/__phutil_library_map__.php

8291 lines
659 KiB
PHP
Raw Normal View History

<?php
/**
* This file is automatically generated. Use 'arc liberate' to rebuild it.
*
* @generated
* @phutil-library-version 2
*/
phutil_register_library_map(array(
'__library_version__' => 2,
'class' => array(
'AlmanacAddress' => 'applications/almanac/util/AlmanacAddress.php',
'AlmanacBinding' => 'applications/almanac/storage/AlmanacBinding.php',
'AlmanacBindingEditController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacBindingEditController.php',
'AlmanacBindingEditor' => 'applications/almanac/editor/AlmanacBindingEditor.php',
'AlmanacBindingPHIDType' => 'applications/almanac/phid/AlmanacBindingPHIDType.php',
'AlmanacBindingQuery' => 'applications/almanac/query/AlmanacBindingQuery.php',
'AlmanacBindingTableView' => 'applications/almanac/view/AlmanacBindingTableView.php',
'AlmanacBindingTransaction' => 'applications/almanac/storage/AlmanacBindingTransaction.php',
'AlmanacBindingTransactionQuery' => 'applications/almanac/query/AlmanacBindingTransactionQuery.php',
'AlmanacBindingViewController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacBindingViewController.php',
'AlmanacClusterDatabaseServiceType' => 'applications/almanac/servicetype/AlmanacClusterDatabaseServiceType.php',
'AlmanacClusterRepositoryServiceType' => 'applications/almanac/servicetype/AlmanacClusterRepositoryServiceType.php',
'AlmanacClusterServiceType' => 'applications/almanac/servicetype/AlmanacClusterServiceType.php',
'AlmanacConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/almanac/conduit/AlmanacConduitAPIMethod.php',
'AlmanacConsoleController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacConsoleController.php',
'AlmanacController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacController.php',
2014-11-06 00:27:16 +01:00
'AlmanacCoreCustomField' => 'applications/almanac/customfield/AlmanacCoreCustomField.php',
'AlmanacCreateClusterServicesCapability' => 'applications/almanac/capability/AlmanacCreateClusterServicesCapability.php',
'AlmanacCreateDevicesCapability' => 'applications/almanac/capability/AlmanacCreateDevicesCapability.php',
'AlmanacCreateNetworksCapability' => 'applications/almanac/capability/AlmanacCreateNetworksCapability.php',
'AlmanacCreateServicesCapability' => 'applications/almanac/capability/AlmanacCreateServicesCapability.php',
2014-11-06 00:27:16 +01:00
'AlmanacCustomField' => 'applications/almanac/customfield/AlmanacCustomField.php',
'AlmanacCustomServiceType' => 'applications/almanac/servicetype/AlmanacCustomServiceType.php',
'AlmanacDAO' => 'applications/almanac/storage/AlmanacDAO.php',
'AlmanacDevice' => 'applications/almanac/storage/AlmanacDevice.php',
'AlmanacDeviceController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacDeviceController.php',
'AlmanacDeviceEditController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacDeviceEditController.php',
'AlmanacDeviceEditor' => 'applications/almanac/editor/AlmanacDeviceEditor.php',
'AlmanacDeviceListController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacDeviceListController.php',
'AlmanacDevicePHIDType' => 'applications/almanac/phid/AlmanacDevicePHIDType.php',
'AlmanacDeviceQuery' => 'applications/almanac/query/AlmanacDeviceQuery.php',
'AlmanacDeviceSearchEngine' => 'applications/almanac/query/AlmanacDeviceSearchEngine.php',
'AlmanacDeviceTransaction' => 'applications/almanac/storage/AlmanacDeviceTransaction.php',
'AlmanacDeviceTransactionQuery' => 'applications/almanac/query/AlmanacDeviceTransactionQuery.php',
'AlmanacDeviceViewController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacDeviceViewController.php',
'AlmanacDrydockPoolServiceType' => 'applications/almanac/servicetype/AlmanacDrydockPoolServiceType.php',
'AlmanacInterface' => 'applications/almanac/storage/AlmanacInterface.php',
'AlmanacInterfaceDatasource' => 'applications/almanac/typeahead/AlmanacInterfaceDatasource.php',
'AlmanacInterfaceEditController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacInterfaceEditController.php',
'AlmanacInterfacePHIDType' => 'applications/almanac/phid/AlmanacInterfacePHIDType.php',
'AlmanacInterfaceQuery' => 'applications/almanac/query/AlmanacInterfaceQuery.php',
'AlmanacInterfaceTableView' => 'applications/almanac/view/AlmanacInterfaceTableView.php',
'AlmanacKeys' => 'applications/almanac/util/AlmanacKeys.php',
'AlmanacManagementLockWorkflow' => 'applications/almanac/management/AlmanacManagementLockWorkflow.php',
'AlmanacManagementRegisterWorkflow' => 'applications/almanac/management/AlmanacManagementRegisterWorkflow.php',
'AlmanacManagementTrustKeyWorkflow' => 'applications/almanac/management/AlmanacManagementTrustKeyWorkflow.php',
'AlmanacManagementUnlockWorkflow' => 'applications/almanac/management/AlmanacManagementUnlockWorkflow.php',
'AlmanacManagementUntrustKeyWorkflow' => 'applications/almanac/management/AlmanacManagementUntrustKeyWorkflow.php',
'AlmanacManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/almanac/management/AlmanacManagementWorkflow.php',
'AlmanacNames' => 'applications/almanac/util/AlmanacNames.php',
'AlmanacNamesTestCase' => 'applications/almanac/util/__tests__/AlmanacNamesTestCase.php',
'AlmanacNetwork' => 'applications/almanac/storage/AlmanacNetwork.php',
'AlmanacNetworkController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacNetworkController.php',
'AlmanacNetworkEditController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacNetworkEditController.php',
'AlmanacNetworkEditor' => 'applications/almanac/editor/AlmanacNetworkEditor.php',
'AlmanacNetworkListController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacNetworkListController.php',
'AlmanacNetworkPHIDType' => 'applications/almanac/phid/AlmanacNetworkPHIDType.php',
'AlmanacNetworkQuery' => 'applications/almanac/query/AlmanacNetworkQuery.php',
'AlmanacNetworkSearchEngine' => 'applications/almanac/query/AlmanacNetworkSearchEngine.php',
'AlmanacNetworkTransaction' => 'applications/almanac/storage/AlmanacNetworkTransaction.php',
'AlmanacNetworkTransactionQuery' => 'applications/almanac/query/AlmanacNetworkTransactionQuery.php',
'AlmanacNetworkViewController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacNetworkViewController.php',
2014-11-06 00:27:16 +01:00
'AlmanacProperty' => 'applications/almanac/storage/AlmanacProperty.php',
'AlmanacPropertyController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacPropertyController.php',
'AlmanacPropertyDeleteController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacPropertyDeleteController.php',
2014-11-06 00:27:16 +01:00
'AlmanacPropertyEditController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacPropertyEditController.php',
'AlmanacPropertyInterface' => 'applications/almanac/property/AlmanacPropertyInterface.php',
'AlmanacPropertyQuery' => 'applications/almanac/query/AlmanacPropertyQuery.php',
'AlmanacQuery' => 'applications/almanac/query/AlmanacQuery.php',
'AlmanacQueryDevicesConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/almanac/conduit/AlmanacQueryDevicesConduitAPIMethod.php',
'AlmanacQueryServicesConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/almanac/conduit/AlmanacQueryServicesConduitAPIMethod.php',
'AlmanacSchemaSpec' => 'applications/almanac/storage/AlmanacSchemaSpec.php',
'AlmanacService' => 'applications/almanac/storage/AlmanacService.php',
'AlmanacServiceController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacServiceController.php',
'AlmanacServiceDatasource' => 'applications/almanac/typeahead/AlmanacServiceDatasource.php',
'AlmanacServiceEditController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacServiceEditController.php',
'AlmanacServiceEditor' => 'applications/almanac/editor/AlmanacServiceEditor.php',
'AlmanacServiceListController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacServiceListController.php',
'AlmanacServicePHIDType' => 'applications/almanac/phid/AlmanacServicePHIDType.php',
'AlmanacServiceQuery' => 'applications/almanac/query/AlmanacServiceQuery.php',
'AlmanacServiceSearchEngine' => 'applications/almanac/query/AlmanacServiceSearchEngine.php',
'AlmanacServiceTransaction' => 'applications/almanac/storage/AlmanacServiceTransaction.php',
'AlmanacServiceTransactionQuery' => 'applications/almanac/query/AlmanacServiceTransactionQuery.php',
'AlmanacServiceType' => 'applications/almanac/servicetype/AlmanacServiceType.php',
'AlmanacServiceTypeTestCase' => 'applications/almanac/servicetype/__tests__/AlmanacServiceTypeTestCase.php',
'AlmanacServiceViewController' => 'applications/almanac/controller/AlmanacServiceViewController.php',
'AphlictDropdownDataQuery' => 'applications/aphlict/query/AphlictDropdownDataQuery.php',
'Aphront304Response' => 'aphront/response/Aphront304Response.php',
'Aphront400Response' => 'aphront/response/Aphront400Response.php',
'Aphront403Response' => 'aphront/response/Aphront403Response.php',
'Aphront404Response' => 'aphront/response/Aphront404Response.php',
'AphrontAjaxResponse' => 'aphront/response/AphrontAjaxResponse.php',
'AphrontApplicationConfiguration' => 'aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php',
'AphrontBarView' => 'view/widget/bars/AphrontBarView.php',
'AphrontBoolHTTPParameterType' => 'aphront/httpparametertype/AphrontBoolHTTPParameterType.php',
'AphrontCSRFException' => 'aphront/exception/AphrontCSRFException.php',
'AphrontCalendarEventView' => 'applications/calendar/view/AphrontCalendarEventView.php',
'AphrontController' => 'aphront/AphrontController.php',
Rename "IDPaged" to "CursorPaged", "executeWithPager" to "executeWith[Cursor|Offset]Pager" Summary: I'm trying to make progress on the policy/visibility stuff since it's a blocker for Wikimedia. First, I want to improve Projects so they can serve as policy groups (e.g., an object can have a visibility policy like "Visible to: members of project 'security'"). However, doing this without breaking anything or snowballing into a bigger change is a bit awkward because Projects are name-ordered and we have a Conduit API which does offset paging. Rather than breaking or rewriting this stuff, I want to just continue offset paging them for now. So I'm going to make PhabricatorPolicyQuery extend PhabricatorOffsetPagedQuery, but can't currently since the `executeWithPager` methods would clash. These methods do different things anyway and are probably better with different names. This also generally improves the names of these classes, since cursors are not necessarily IDs (in the feed case, they're "chronlogicalKeys", for example). I did leave some of the interals as "ID" since calling them "Cursor"s (e.g., `setAfterCursor()`) seemed a little wrong -- it should maybe be `setAfterCursorPosition()`. These APIs have very limited use and can easily be made more consistent later. Test Plan: Browsed around various affected tools; any issues here should throw/fail in a loud/obvious way. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan Reviewed By: vrana CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T603 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3177
2012-08-07 20:54:06 +02:00
'AphrontCursorPagerView' => 'view/control/AphrontCursorPagerView.php',
'AphrontDefaultApplicationConfiguration' => 'aphront/configuration/AphrontDefaultApplicationConfiguration.php',
'AphrontDialogResponse' => 'aphront/response/AphrontDialogResponse.php',
'AphrontDialogView' => 'view/AphrontDialogView.php',
'AphrontException' => 'aphront/exception/AphrontException.php',
'AphrontFileResponse' => 'aphront/response/AphrontFileResponse.php',
'AphrontFormCheckboxControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormCheckboxControl.php',
'AphrontFormChooseButtonControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormChooseButtonControl.php',
'AphrontFormControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormControl.php',
'AphrontFormDateControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormDateControl.php',
'AphrontFormDateControlValue' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormDateControlValue.php',
'AphrontFormDividerControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormDividerControl.php',
'AphrontFormFileControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormFileControl.php',
'AphrontFormHandlesControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormHandlesControl.php',
'AphrontFormMarkupControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormMarkupControl.php',
'AphrontFormPasswordControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormPasswordControl.php',
'AphrontFormPolicyControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormPolicyControl.php',
'AphrontFormRadioButtonControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormRadioButtonControl.php',
'AphrontFormRecaptchaControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormRecaptchaControl.php',
'AphrontFormSelectControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormSelectControl.php',
'AphrontFormStaticControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormStaticControl.php',
'AphrontFormSubmitControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormSubmitControl.php',
'AphrontFormTextAreaControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormTextAreaControl.php',
'AphrontFormTextControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormTextControl.php',
'AphrontFormTextWithSubmitControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormTextWithSubmitControl.php',
'AphrontFormTokenizerControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormTokenizerControl.php',
'AphrontFormTypeaheadControl' => 'view/form/control/AphrontFormTypeaheadControl.php',
'AphrontFormView' => 'view/form/AphrontFormView.php',
'AphrontGlyphBarView' => 'view/widget/bars/AphrontGlyphBarView.php',
2012-11-29 08:57:13 +01:00
'AphrontHTMLResponse' => 'aphront/response/AphrontHTMLResponse.php',
'AphrontHTTPParameterType' => 'aphront/httpparametertype/AphrontHTTPParameterType.php',
'AphrontHTTPProxyResponse' => 'aphront/response/AphrontHTTPProxyResponse.php',
'AphrontHTTPSink' => 'aphront/sink/AphrontHTTPSink.php',
'AphrontHTTPSinkTestCase' => 'aphront/sink/__tests__/AphrontHTTPSinkTestCase.php',
'AphrontIntHTTPParameterType' => 'aphront/httpparametertype/AphrontIntHTTPParameterType.php',
'AphrontIsolatedDatabaseConnectionTestCase' => 'infrastructure/storage/__tests__/AphrontIsolatedDatabaseConnectionTestCase.php',
'AphrontIsolatedHTTPSink' => 'aphront/sink/AphrontIsolatedHTTPSink.php',
'AphrontJSONResponse' => 'aphront/response/AphrontJSONResponse.php',
'AphrontJavelinView' => 'view/AphrontJavelinView.php',
'AphrontKeyboardShortcutsAvailableView' => 'view/widget/AphrontKeyboardShortcutsAvailableView.php',
'AphrontListFilterView' => 'view/layout/AphrontListFilterView.php',
'AphrontListHTTPParameterType' => 'aphront/httpparametertype/AphrontListHTTPParameterType.php',
'AphrontMalformedRequestException' => 'aphront/exception/AphrontMalformedRequestException.php',
'AphrontMoreView' => 'view/layout/AphrontMoreView.php',
'AphrontMultiColumnView' => 'view/layout/AphrontMultiColumnView.php',
'AphrontMySQLDatabaseConnectionTestCase' => 'infrastructure/storage/__tests__/AphrontMySQLDatabaseConnectionTestCase.php',
'AphrontNullView' => 'view/AphrontNullView.php',
'AphrontPHIDHTTPParameterType' => 'aphront/httpparametertype/AphrontPHIDHTTPParameterType.php',
'AphrontPHIDListHTTPParameterType' => 'aphront/httpparametertype/AphrontPHIDListHTTPParameterType.php',
'AphrontPHPHTTPSink' => 'aphront/sink/AphrontPHPHTTPSink.php',
'AphrontPageView' => 'view/page/AphrontPageView.php',
'AphrontPlainTextResponse' => 'aphront/response/AphrontPlainTextResponse.php',
'AphrontProgressBarView' => 'view/widget/bars/AphrontProgressBarView.php',
'AphrontProjectListHTTPParameterType' => 'aphront/httpparametertype/AphrontProjectListHTTPParameterType.php',
'AphrontProxyResponse' => 'aphront/response/AphrontProxyResponse.php',
'AphrontRedirectResponse' => 'aphront/response/AphrontRedirectResponse.php',
'AphrontRedirectResponseTestCase' => 'aphront/response/__tests__/AphrontRedirectResponseTestCase.php',
'AphrontReloadResponse' => 'aphront/response/AphrontReloadResponse.php',
'AphrontRequest' => 'aphront/AphrontRequest.php',
'AphrontRequestExceptionHandler' => 'aphront/handler/AphrontRequestExceptionHandler.php',
'AphrontRequestTestCase' => 'aphront/__tests__/AphrontRequestTestCase.php',
'AphrontResponse' => 'aphront/response/AphrontResponse.php',
'AphrontResponseProducerInterface' => 'aphront/interface/AphrontResponseProducerInterface.php',
'AphrontRoutingMap' => 'aphront/site/AphrontRoutingMap.php',
'AphrontRoutingResult' => 'aphront/site/AphrontRoutingResult.php',
'AphrontSelectHTTPParameterType' => 'aphront/httpparametertype/AphrontSelectHTTPParameterType.php',
'AphrontSideNavFilterView' => 'view/layout/AphrontSideNavFilterView.php',
'AphrontSite' => 'aphront/site/AphrontSite.php',
'AphrontStackTraceView' => 'view/widget/AphrontStackTraceView.php',
Improve top-level exception handling Summary: Fixes T6692. Addresses two main issues: - The write guard would sometimes not get disposed of on exception pathways, generating an unnecessary secondary error which was just a symptom of the original root error. - This was generally confusing and reduced the quality of reports we received because users would report the symptomatic error sometimes instead of the real error. - Instead, reflow the handling so that we always dispose of the write guard if we create one. - If we missed the Controller-level error page generation (normally, a nice page with full CSS, etc), we'd jump straight to Startup-level error page generation (very basic plain text). - A large class of errors occur too early or too late to be handled by Controller-level pages, but many of these errors are not fundamental, and the plain text page is excessively severe. - Provide a mid-level simple HTML error page for errors which can't get full CSS, but also aren't so fundamental that we have no recourse but plain text. Test Plan: Mid-level errors now produce an intentional-looking error page: {F259885} Verified that setup errors still render properly. @chad, feel free to tweak the exception page -- I just did a rough pass on it. Like the setup error stuff, it doesn't have Celerity, so we can't use `{$colors}` and no other CSS will be loaded. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley, chad Maniphest Tasks: T6692 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11126
2015-01-02 19:49:27 +01:00
'AphrontStandaloneHTMLResponse' => 'aphront/response/AphrontStandaloneHTMLResponse.php',
'AphrontStringHTTPParameterType' => 'aphront/httpparametertype/AphrontStringHTTPParameterType.php',
'AphrontStringListHTTPParameterType' => 'aphront/httpparametertype/AphrontStringListHTTPParameterType.php',
'AphrontTableView' => 'view/control/AphrontTableView.php',
'AphrontTagView' => 'view/AphrontTagView.php',
'AphrontTokenizerTemplateView' => 'view/control/AphrontTokenizerTemplateView.php',
'AphrontTypeaheadTemplateView' => 'view/control/AphrontTypeaheadTemplateView.php',
Improve top-level exception handling Summary: Fixes T6692. Addresses two main issues: - The write guard would sometimes not get disposed of on exception pathways, generating an unnecessary secondary error which was just a symptom of the original root error. - This was generally confusing and reduced the quality of reports we received because users would report the symptomatic error sometimes instead of the real error. - Instead, reflow the handling so that we always dispose of the write guard if we create one. - If we missed the Controller-level error page generation (normally, a nice page with full CSS, etc), we'd jump straight to Startup-level error page generation (very basic plain text). - A large class of errors occur too early or too late to be handled by Controller-level pages, but many of these errors are not fundamental, and the plain text page is excessively severe. - Provide a mid-level simple HTML error page for errors which can't get full CSS, but also aren't so fundamental that we have no recourse but plain text. Test Plan: Mid-level errors now produce an intentional-looking error page: {F259885} Verified that setup errors still render properly. @chad, feel free to tweak the exception page -- I just did a rough pass on it. Like the setup error stuff, it doesn't have Celerity, so we can't use `{$colors}` and no other CSS will be loaded. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley, chad Maniphest Tasks: T6692 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11126
2015-01-02 19:49:27 +01:00
'AphrontUnhandledExceptionResponse' => 'aphront/response/AphrontUnhandledExceptionResponse.php',
'AphrontUserListHTTPParameterType' => 'aphront/httpparametertype/AphrontUserListHTTPParameterType.php',
'AphrontView' => 'view/AphrontView.php',
'AphrontWebpageResponse' => 'aphront/response/AphrontWebpageResponse.php',
'ArcanistConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/arcanist/conduit/ArcanistConduitAPIMethod.php',
'AuditConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/audit/conduit/AuditConduitAPIMethod.php',
'AuditQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/audit/conduit/AuditQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'AuthManageProvidersCapability' => 'applications/auth/capability/AuthManageProvidersCapability.php',
'CalendarTimeUtil' => 'applications/calendar/util/CalendarTimeUtil.php',
'CalendarTimeUtilTestCase' => 'applications/calendar/__tests__/CalendarTimeUtilTestCase.php',
'CelerityAPI' => 'applications/celerity/CelerityAPI.php',
'CelerityDefaultPostprocessor' => 'applications/celerity/postprocessor/CelerityDefaultPostprocessor.php',
'CelerityHighContrastPostprocessor' => 'applications/celerity/postprocessor/CelerityHighContrastPostprocessor.php',
'CelerityLargeFontPostprocessor' => 'applications/celerity/postprocessor/CelerityLargeFontPostprocessor.php',
'CelerityManagementMapWorkflow' => 'applications/celerity/management/CelerityManagementMapWorkflow.php',
'CelerityManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/celerity/management/CelerityManagementWorkflow.php',
'CelerityPhabricatorResourceController' => 'applications/celerity/controller/CelerityPhabricatorResourceController.php',
'CelerityPhabricatorResources' => 'applications/celerity/resources/CelerityPhabricatorResources.php',
'CelerityPhysicalResources' => 'applications/celerity/resources/CelerityPhysicalResources.php',
'CelerityPhysicalResourcesTestCase' => 'applications/celerity/resources/__tests__/CelerityPhysicalResourcesTestCase.php',
'CelerityPostprocessor' => 'applications/celerity/postprocessor/CelerityPostprocessor.php',
'CelerityPostprocessorTestCase' => 'applications/celerity/__tests__/CelerityPostprocessorTestCase.php',
'CelerityResourceController' => 'applications/celerity/controller/CelerityResourceController.php',
'CelerityResourceGraph' => 'applications/celerity/CelerityResourceGraph.php',
'CelerityResourceMap' => 'applications/celerity/CelerityResourceMap.php',
'CelerityResourceMapGenerator' => 'applications/celerity/CelerityResourceMapGenerator.php',
'CelerityResourceTransformer' => 'applications/celerity/CelerityResourceTransformer.php',
'CelerityResourceTransformerTestCase' => 'applications/celerity/__tests__/CelerityResourceTransformerTestCase.php',
'CelerityResources' => 'applications/celerity/resources/CelerityResources.php',
'CelerityResourcesOnDisk' => 'applications/celerity/resources/CelerityResourcesOnDisk.php',
'CeleritySpriteGenerator' => 'applications/celerity/CeleritySpriteGenerator.php',
'CelerityStaticResourceResponse' => 'applications/celerity/CelerityStaticResourceResponse.php',
'ChatLogConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/chatlog/conduit/ChatLogConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ChatLogQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/chatlog/conduit/ChatLogQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ChatLogRecordConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/chatlog/conduit/ChatLogRecordConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/conduit/method/ConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ConduitAPIMethodTestCase' => 'applications/conduit/method/__tests__/ConduitAPIMethodTestCase.php',
'ConduitAPIRequest' => 'applications/conduit/protocol/ConduitAPIRequest.php',
'ConduitAPIResponse' => 'applications/conduit/protocol/ConduitAPIResponse.php',
'ConduitApplicationNotInstalledException' => 'applications/conduit/protocol/exception/ConduitApplicationNotInstalledException.php',
'ConduitBoolParameterType' => 'applications/conduit/parametertype/ConduitBoolParameterType.php',
'ConduitCall' => 'applications/conduit/call/ConduitCall.php',
'ConduitCallTestCase' => 'applications/conduit/call/__tests__/ConduitCallTestCase.php',
'ConduitConnectConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/conduit/method/ConduitConnectConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ConduitConnectionGarbageCollector' => 'applications/conduit/garbagecollector/ConduitConnectionGarbageCollector.php',
'ConduitDeprecatedCallSetupCheck' => 'applications/conduit/check/ConduitDeprecatedCallSetupCheck.php',
'ConduitEpochParameterType' => 'applications/conduit/parametertype/ConduitEpochParameterType.php',
'ConduitException' => 'applications/conduit/protocol/exception/ConduitException.php',
'ConduitGetCapabilitiesConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/conduit/method/ConduitGetCapabilitiesConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ConduitGetCertificateConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/conduit/method/ConduitGetCertificateConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ConduitIntListParameterType' => 'applications/conduit/parametertype/ConduitIntListParameterType.php',
'ConduitIntParameterType' => 'applications/conduit/parametertype/ConduitIntParameterType.php',
'ConduitListParameterType' => 'applications/conduit/parametertype/ConduitListParameterType.php',
'ConduitLogGarbageCollector' => 'applications/conduit/garbagecollector/ConduitLogGarbageCollector.php',
'ConduitMethodDoesNotExistException' => 'applications/conduit/protocol/exception/ConduitMethodDoesNotExistException.php',
'ConduitMethodNotFoundException' => 'applications/conduit/protocol/exception/ConduitMethodNotFoundException.php',
'ConduitPHIDListParameterType' => 'applications/conduit/parametertype/ConduitPHIDListParameterType.php',
'ConduitParameterType' => 'applications/conduit/parametertype/ConduitParameterType.php',
'ConduitPingConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/conduit/method/ConduitPingConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ConduitProjectListParameterType' => 'applications/conduit/parametertype/ConduitProjectListParameterType.php',
'ConduitQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/conduit/method/ConduitQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ConduitResultSearchEngineExtension' => 'applications/conduit/query/ConduitResultSearchEngineExtension.php',
Implement SSHD glue and Conduit SSH endpoint Summary: - Build "sshd-auth" (for authentication) and "sshd-exec" (for command execution) binaries. These are callable by "sshd-vcs", located [[https://github.com/epriestley/sshd-vcs | in my account on GitHub]]. They are based on precursors [[https://github.com/epriestley/sshd-vcs-glue | here on GitHub]] which I deployed for TenXer about a year ago, so I have some confidence they at least basically work. - The problem this solves is that normally every user would need an account on a machine to connect to it, and/or their public keys would all need to be listed in `~/.authorized_keys`. This is a big pain in most installs. Software like Gitosis/Gitolite solve this problem by giving you an easy way to add public keys to `~/.authorized_keys`, but this is pretty gross. - Roughly, instead of looking in `~/.authorized_keys` when a user connects, the patched sshd instead runs `echo <public key> | sshd-auth`. The `sshd-auth` script looks up the public key and authorizes the matching user, if they exist. It also forces sshd to run `sshd-exec` instead of a normal shell. - `sshd-exec` receives the authenticated user and any command which was passed to ssh (like `git receive-pack`) and can route them appropriately. - Overall, this permits a single account to be set up on a server which all Phabricator users can connect to without any extra work, and which can safely execute commands and apply appropriate permissions, and disable users when they are disabled in Phabricator and all that stuff. - Build out "sshd-exec" to do more thorough checks and setup, and delegate command execution to Workflows (they now exist, and did not when I originally built this stuff). - Convert @btrahan's conduit API script into a workflow and slightly simplify it (ConduitCall did not exist at the time it was written). The next steps here on the Repository side are to implement Workflows for Git, SVN and HG wire protocols. These will mostly just proxy the protocols, but also need to enforce permissions. So the approach will basically be: - Implement workflows for stuff like `git receive-pack`. - These workflows will implement enough of the underlying protocol to determine what resource the user is trying to access, and whether they want to read or write it. - They'll then do a permissons check, and kick the user out if they don't have permission to do whatever they are trying to do. - If the user does have permission, we just proxy the rest of the transaction. Next steps on the Conduit side are more simple: - Make ConduitClient understand "ssh://" URLs. Test Plan: Ran `sshd-exec --phabricator-ssh-user epriestley conduit differential.query`, etc. This will get a more comprehensive test once I set up sshd-vcs. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T603, T550 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4229
2012-12-19 20:08:07 +01:00
'ConduitSSHWorkflow' => 'applications/conduit/ssh/ConduitSSHWorkflow.php',
'ConduitStringListParameterType' => 'applications/conduit/parametertype/ConduitStringListParameterType.php',
'ConduitStringParameterType' => 'applications/conduit/parametertype/ConduitStringParameterType.php',
Add Conduit Tokens to make authentication in Conduit somewhat more sane Summary: Ref T5955. Summary of intended changes: **Improve Granularity of Authorization**: Currently, users have one Conduit Certificate. This isn't very flexible, and means that you can't ever generate an API token with limited permissions or IP block controls (see T6706). This moves toward a world where you can generate multiple tokens, revoke them individually, and assign disparate privileges to them. **Standardize Token Management**: This moves Conduit to work the same way that sessions, OAuth authorizations, and temporary tokens already work, instead of being this crazy bizarre mess. **Make Authentication Faster**: Authentication currently requires a handshake (conduit.connect) to establish a session, like the web UI. This is unnecessary from a security point of view and puts an extra round trip in front of all Conduit activity. Essentially no other API anywhere works like this. **Make Authentication Simpler**: The handshake is complex, and involves deriving hashes. The session is also complex, and creates issues like T4377. Handshake and session management require different inputs. **Make Token Management Simpler**: The certificate is this huge long thing right now, which is not necessary from a security perspective. There are separate Arcanist handshake tokens, but they have a different set of issues. We can move forward to a token management world where neither of these problems exist. **Lower Protocol Barrier**: The simplest possible API client is very complex right now. It should be `curl`. Simplifying authentication is a necessary step toward this. **Unblock T2783**: T2783 is blocked on nodes in the cluster making authenticated API calls to other nodes. This provides a simpler way forward than the handshake mess (or enormous-hack-mess) which would currently be required. Test Plan: - Generated tokens. - Generated tokens for a bot account. - Terminated tokens (and for a bot account). - Terminated all tokens (and for a bot account). - Ran GC and saw it reap all the expired tokens. NOTE: These tokens can not actually be used to authenticate yet! {F249658} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T5955 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10985
2014-12-15 20:14:23 +01:00
'ConduitTokenGarbageCollector' => 'applications/conduit/garbagecollector/ConduitTokenGarbageCollector.php',
'ConduitUserListParameterType' => 'applications/conduit/parametertype/ConduitUserListParameterType.php',
Conpherence - make the durable column kind of work and stuff Summary: Ref T7014. This hooks up the durable column such that when you open it up it loads your most recent Conpherence. You can then switch amongst the various widgets and stuff and everything works nicely. Except... - scroll bar does not work - also doesn't work at HEAD when I add a ton of text to the UI with no changes? (wrapped $copy in array_fill(0, 1000, $copy)) - "widget selector" does not collapse when you select something else - this part wasn't really specified so I used the aphlict dropdown stuff. didn't want to keep working on that if this was the wrong UI choice - can not edit title - do we still want that to be done by clicking on the title, which pops a dialogue? - can not add participants or calendar events - what should this UI be? maybe just a button on the top for "participants" and a button on the bottom for calendar? both on top? - this is not pixel perfect to the mock or two I've seen around. Aside from generally being bad at that, I definitely didn't get the name + timestamps formatting correctly, because the standard DOM of that has timestamp FIRST which appears second due to a "float right". Seemed like a lot of special-casing for what might not even be that important in the UI so I punted. (And again, there's likely many unknown ways in which this isn't pixel perfect) There's also code quality issues - `ConpherenceWidgetConfigConstants` is hopefully temporary or at least gets more sleek as we keep progressing here - copied some CSS from main Conpherence app - DOM structure is pretty different - there's some minor CSS tweaks too given the different width (not to mention the DOM structure being different) - copied some JS from behavior-pontificate.js to sync threads relative to aphlict updates - JS in general is like a better version of existing JS; these should collapse I'd hope? - maybe the aphlict-behavior-dropdown change was badsauce? ...but all that said, this definitely feels really nice and I feel like adding stuff is going to be really easy compared to how normal Conpherence is. Also includes a bonus bug fix - we now correctly update participation. The user would encounter this issue if they were in a conpherence that got some updates and then they went to a different page; they would have unread status for the messages that were ajax'd in. This patch fixes that by making sure we mark participation up to date with the proper transaction in all cases. Test Plan: hit "\" to invoke the column and saw nice loading UI and my latest conpherence load. sent messages and verified they received A-OK by looking in DOM console. toggled various widges and verified they rendered correctly. opened up a second browser with a second user on the thread, sent a message, and it was received in a nice asynchronous fashion Reviewers: chad, epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7014 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11968
2015-03-05 19:33:39 +01:00
'ConpherenceColumnViewController' => 'applications/conpherence/controller/ConpherenceColumnViewController.php',
'ConpherenceConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/conpherence/conduit/ConpherenceConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ConpherenceConfigOptions' => 'applications/conpherence/config/ConpherenceConfigOptions.php',
'ConpherenceConstants' => 'applications/conpherence/constants/ConpherenceConstants.php',
'ConpherenceController' => 'applications/conpherence/controller/ConpherenceController.php',
'ConpherenceCreateThreadConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/conpherence/conduit/ConpherenceCreateThreadConduitAPIMethod.php',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'ConpherenceCreateThreadMailReceiver' => 'applications/conpherence/mail/ConpherenceCreateThreadMailReceiver.php',
'ConpherenceDAO' => 'applications/conpherence/storage/ConpherenceDAO.php',
'ConpherenceDurableColumnView' => 'applications/conpherence/view/ConpherenceDurableColumnView.php',
'ConpherenceEditor' => 'applications/conpherence/editor/ConpherenceEditor.php',
'ConpherenceFormDragAndDropUploadControl' => 'applications/conpherence/view/ConpherenceFormDragAndDropUploadControl.php',
'ConpherenceFulltextQuery' => 'applications/conpherence/query/ConpherenceFulltextQuery.php',
'ConpherenceHovercardEventListener' => 'applications/conpherence/events/ConpherenceHovercardEventListener.php',
'ConpherenceImageData' => 'applications/conpherence/constants/ConpherenceImageData.php',
'ConpherenceIndex' => 'applications/conpherence/storage/ConpherenceIndex.php',
'ConpherenceLayoutView' => 'applications/conpherence/view/ConpherenceLayoutView.php',
'ConpherenceListController' => 'applications/conpherence/controller/ConpherenceListController.php',
'ConpherenceMenuItemView' => 'applications/conpherence/view/ConpherenceMenuItemView.php',
'ConpherenceNewRoomController' => 'applications/conpherence/controller/ConpherenceNewRoomController.php',
'ConpherenceNotificationPanelController' => 'applications/conpherence/controller/ConpherenceNotificationPanelController.php',
'ConpherenceParticipant' => 'applications/conpherence/storage/ConpherenceParticipant.php',
'ConpherenceParticipantCountQuery' => 'applications/conpherence/query/ConpherenceParticipantCountQuery.php',
'ConpherenceParticipantQuery' => 'applications/conpherence/query/ConpherenceParticipantQuery.php',
'ConpherenceParticipationStatus' => 'applications/conpherence/constants/ConpherenceParticipationStatus.php',
'ConpherencePeopleWidgetView' => 'applications/conpherence/view/ConpherencePeopleWidgetView.php',
'ConpherencePicCropControl' => 'applications/conpherence/view/ConpherencePicCropControl.php',
'ConpherenceQueryThreadConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/conpherence/conduit/ConpherenceQueryThreadConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ConpherenceQueryTransactionConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/conpherence/conduit/ConpherenceQueryTransactionConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ConpherenceReplyHandler' => 'applications/conpherence/mail/ConpherenceReplyHandler.php',
'ConpherenceRoomListController' => 'applications/conpherence/controller/ConpherenceRoomListController.php',
'ConpherenceRoomTestCase' => 'applications/conpherence/__tests__/ConpherenceRoomTestCase.php',
'ConpherenceSchemaSpec' => 'applications/conpherence/storage/ConpherenceSchemaSpec.php',
'ConpherenceSettings' => 'applications/conpherence/constants/ConpherenceSettings.php',
'ConpherenceTestCase' => 'applications/conpherence/__tests__/ConpherenceTestCase.php',
'ConpherenceThread' => 'applications/conpherence/storage/ConpherenceThread.php',
'ConpherenceThreadIndexer' => 'applications/conpherence/search/ConpherenceThreadIndexer.php',
'ConpherenceThreadListView' => 'applications/conpherence/view/ConpherenceThreadListView.php',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'ConpherenceThreadMailReceiver' => 'applications/conpherence/mail/ConpherenceThreadMailReceiver.php',
'ConpherenceThreadMembersPolicyRule' => 'applications/conpherence/policyrule/ConpherenceThreadMembersPolicyRule.php',
'ConpherenceThreadQuery' => 'applications/conpherence/query/ConpherenceThreadQuery.php',
'ConpherenceThreadRemarkupRule' => 'applications/conpherence/remarkup/ConpherenceThreadRemarkupRule.php',
'ConpherenceThreadSearchEngine' => 'applications/conpherence/query/ConpherenceThreadSearchEngine.php',
'ConpherenceTransaction' => 'applications/conpherence/storage/ConpherenceTransaction.php',
'ConpherenceTransactionComment' => 'applications/conpherence/storage/ConpherenceTransactionComment.php',
'ConpherenceTransactionQuery' => 'applications/conpherence/query/ConpherenceTransactionQuery.php',
'ConpherenceTransactionRenderer' => 'applications/conpherence/ConpherenceTransactionRenderer.php',
'ConpherenceTransactionView' => 'applications/conpherence/view/ConpherenceTransactionView.php',
'ConpherenceUpdateActions' => 'applications/conpherence/constants/ConpherenceUpdateActions.php',
'ConpherenceUpdateController' => 'applications/conpherence/controller/ConpherenceUpdateController.php',
'ConpherenceUpdateThreadConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/conpherence/conduit/ConpherenceUpdateThreadConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ConpherenceViewController' => 'applications/conpherence/controller/ConpherenceViewController.php',
Conpherence - make the durable column kind of work and stuff Summary: Ref T7014. This hooks up the durable column such that when you open it up it loads your most recent Conpherence. You can then switch amongst the various widgets and stuff and everything works nicely. Except... - scroll bar does not work - also doesn't work at HEAD when I add a ton of text to the UI with no changes? (wrapped $copy in array_fill(0, 1000, $copy)) - "widget selector" does not collapse when you select something else - this part wasn't really specified so I used the aphlict dropdown stuff. didn't want to keep working on that if this was the wrong UI choice - can not edit title - do we still want that to be done by clicking on the title, which pops a dialogue? - can not add participants or calendar events - what should this UI be? maybe just a button on the top for "participants" and a button on the bottom for calendar? both on top? - this is not pixel perfect to the mock or two I've seen around. Aside from generally being bad at that, I definitely didn't get the name + timestamps formatting correctly, because the standard DOM of that has timestamp FIRST which appears second due to a "float right". Seemed like a lot of special-casing for what might not even be that important in the UI so I punted. (And again, there's likely many unknown ways in which this isn't pixel perfect) There's also code quality issues - `ConpherenceWidgetConfigConstants` is hopefully temporary or at least gets more sleek as we keep progressing here - copied some CSS from main Conpherence app - DOM structure is pretty different - there's some minor CSS tweaks too given the different width (not to mention the DOM structure being different) - copied some JS from behavior-pontificate.js to sync threads relative to aphlict updates - JS in general is like a better version of existing JS; these should collapse I'd hope? - maybe the aphlict-behavior-dropdown change was badsauce? ...but all that said, this definitely feels really nice and I feel like adding stuff is going to be really easy compared to how normal Conpherence is. Also includes a bonus bug fix - we now correctly update participation. The user would encounter this issue if they were in a conpherence that got some updates and then they went to a different page; they would have unread status for the messages that were ajax'd in. This patch fixes that by making sure we mark participation up to date with the proper transaction in all cases. Test Plan: hit "\" to invoke the column and saw nice loading UI and my latest conpherence load. sent messages and verified they received A-OK by looking in DOM console. toggled various widges and verified they rendered correctly. opened up a second browser with a second user on the thread, sent a message, and it was received in a nice asynchronous fashion Reviewers: chad, epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7014 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11968
2015-03-05 19:33:39 +01:00
'ConpherenceWidgetConfigConstants' => 'applications/conpherence/constants/ConpherenceWidgetConfigConstants.php',
'ConpherenceWidgetController' => 'applications/conpherence/controller/ConpherenceWidgetController.php',
'ConpherenceWidgetView' => 'applications/conpherence/view/ConpherenceWidgetView.php',
'DarkConsoleController' => 'applications/console/controller/DarkConsoleController.php',
'DarkConsoleCore' => 'applications/console/core/DarkConsoleCore.php',
'DarkConsoleDataController' => 'applications/console/controller/DarkConsoleDataController.php',
'DarkConsoleErrorLogPlugin' => 'applications/console/plugin/DarkConsoleErrorLogPlugin.php',
'DarkConsoleErrorLogPluginAPI' => 'applications/console/plugin/errorlog/DarkConsoleErrorLogPluginAPI.php',
'DarkConsoleEventPlugin' => 'applications/console/plugin/DarkConsoleEventPlugin.php',
'DarkConsoleEventPluginAPI' => 'applications/console/plugin/event/DarkConsoleEventPluginAPI.php',
'DarkConsolePlugin' => 'applications/console/plugin/DarkConsolePlugin.php',
'DarkConsoleRequestPlugin' => 'applications/console/plugin/DarkConsoleRequestPlugin.php',
'DarkConsoleServicesPlugin' => 'applications/console/plugin/DarkConsoleServicesPlugin.php',
'DarkConsoleStartupPlugin' => 'applications/console/plugin/DarkConsoleStartupPlugin.php',
'DarkConsoleXHProfPlugin' => 'applications/console/plugin/DarkConsoleXHProfPlugin.php',
'DarkConsoleXHProfPluginAPI' => 'applications/console/plugin/xhprof/DarkConsoleXHProfPluginAPI.php',
'DatabaseConfigurationProvider' => 'infrastructure/storage/configuration/DatabaseConfigurationProvider.php',
'DefaultDatabaseConfigurationProvider' => 'infrastructure/storage/configuration/DefaultDatabaseConfigurationProvider.php',
'DifferentialAction' => 'applications/differential/constants/DifferentialAction.php',
'DifferentialActionEmailCommand' => 'applications/differential/command/DifferentialActionEmailCommand.php',
'DifferentialActionMenuEventListener' => 'applications/differential/event/DifferentialActionMenuEventListener.php',
'DifferentialAddCommentView' => 'applications/differential/view/DifferentialAddCommentView.php',
'DifferentialAdjustmentMapTestCase' => 'applications/differential/storage/__tests__/DifferentialAdjustmentMapTestCase.php',
'DifferentialAffectedPath' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialAffectedPath.php',
'DifferentialApplyPatchField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialApplyPatchField.php',
'DifferentialAsanaRepresentationField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialAsanaRepresentationField.php',
'DifferentialAuditorsField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialAuditorsField.php',
'DifferentialAuthorField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialAuthorField.php',
'DifferentialBlameRevisionField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialBlameRevisionField.php',
'DifferentialBlockHeraldAction' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialBlockHeraldAction.php',
'DifferentialBranchField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialBranchField.php',
'DifferentialChangeHeraldFieldGroup' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialChangeHeraldFieldGroup.php',
'DifferentialChangeType' => 'applications/differential/constants/DifferentialChangeType.php',
'DifferentialChangesSinceLastUpdateField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialChangesSinceLastUpdateField.php',
'DifferentialChangeset' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialChangeset.php',
'DifferentialChangesetDetailView' => 'applications/differential/view/DifferentialChangesetDetailView.php',
'DifferentialChangesetFileTreeSideNavBuilder' => 'applications/differential/view/DifferentialChangesetFileTreeSideNavBuilder.php',
Implement basic one-up and test renderers Summary: This is a half-step toward one-up and test renderers. This is mostly a structural change, and has no user-facing impact. It splits the rendering hierarchy like this: - Renderer (more methods are abstract than before) - HTML Renderer (most HTML stuff has moved down from the base to here) - HTML 1-up (placeholder only -- not yet a functional implementation) - HTML 2-up (minimal changes, uses mostly old code) - Test Renderer (unit-testable renderer base, implements text versions of the HTML stuff) - Test 1-up (selects 1-up mode for test rendering) - Test 2-up (selects 2-up mode for test rendering) Broadly, I'm trying to share as much code as possible by splitting rendering into more, smaller stages. Specifically, we do this: - Combine the various sorts of inputs (changes, context, inlines, etc.) into a single, relatively homogenous list of "primitives". This happens in the base class. - The primitive types are: old (diff left side), new (diff right side), context ("show more context"), no-context ("context not available") and inline (inline comment). - Possibly, apply a filtering/reordering step to the primitives to get them ready for 1-up rendering. This mostly removes information, and does a small amount of reordering. This also happens in the base class. - Pass the primitives to the actual renderer, to convert them into HTML, text, or whatever else. This happens in the leaf class. The primitive implementation is not yet complete (it doesn't attach as much information to the primitives as it should -- stuff like coverage and copies), but covers the basics. The existing HTMLTwoUp renderer does not use the primitive path; instead, it still goes down the old path. Test Plan: Ran unit tests, looked at a bunch of diffs. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2009 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4421
2013-01-14 23:20:06 +01:00
'DifferentialChangesetHTMLRenderer' => 'applications/differential/render/DifferentialChangesetHTMLRenderer.php',
'DifferentialChangesetListView' => 'applications/differential/view/DifferentialChangesetListView.php',
Implement basic one-up and test renderers Summary: This is a half-step toward one-up and test renderers. This is mostly a structural change, and has no user-facing impact. It splits the rendering hierarchy like this: - Renderer (more methods are abstract than before) - HTML Renderer (most HTML stuff has moved down from the base to here) - HTML 1-up (placeholder only -- not yet a functional implementation) - HTML 2-up (minimal changes, uses mostly old code) - Test Renderer (unit-testable renderer base, implements text versions of the HTML stuff) - Test 1-up (selects 1-up mode for test rendering) - Test 2-up (selects 2-up mode for test rendering) Broadly, I'm trying to share as much code as possible by splitting rendering into more, smaller stages. Specifically, we do this: - Combine the various sorts of inputs (changes, context, inlines, etc.) into a single, relatively homogenous list of "primitives". This happens in the base class. - The primitive types are: old (diff left side), new (diff right side), context ("show more context"), no-context ("context not available") and inline (inline comment). - Possibly, apply a filtering/reordering step to the primitives to get them ready for 1-up rendering. This mostly removes information, and does a small amount of reordering. This also happens in the base class. - Pass the primitives to the actual renderer, to convert them into HTML, text, or whatever else. This happens in the leaf class. The primitive implementation is not yet complete (it doesn't attach as much information to the primitives as it should -- stuff like coverage and copies), but covers the basics. The existing HTMLTwoUp renderer does not use the primitive path; instead, it still goes down the old path. Test Plan: Ran unit tests, looked at a bunch of diffs. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2009 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4421
2013-01-14 23:20:06 +01:00
'DifferentialChangesetOneUpRenderer' => 'applications/differential/render/DifferentialChangesetOneUpRenderer.php',
'DifferentialChangesetOneUpTestRenderer' => 'applications/differential/render/DifferentialChangesetOneUpTestRenderer.php',
'DifferentialChangesetParser' => 'applications/differential/parser/DifferentialChangesetParser.php',
'DifferentialChangesetParserTestCase' => 'applications/differential/parser/__tests__/DifferentialChangesetParserTestCase.php',
'DifferentialChangesetQuery' => 'applications/differential/query/DifferentialChangesetQuery.php',
'DifferentialChangesetRenderer' => 'applications/differential/render/DifferentialChangesetRenderer.php',
Implement basic one-up and test renderers Summary: This is a half-step toward one-up and test renderers. This is mostly a structural change, and has no user-facing impact. It splits the rendering hierarchy like this: - Renderer (more methods are abstract than before) - HTML Renderer (most HTML stuff has moved down from the base to here) - HTML 1-up (placeholder only -- not yet a functional implementation) - HTML 2-up (minimal changes, uses mostly old code) - Test Renderer (unit-testable renderer base, implements text versions of the HTML stuff) - Test 1-up (selects 1-up mode for test rendering) - Test 2-up (selects 2-up mode for test rendering) Broadly, I'm trying to share as much code as possible by splitting rendering into more, smaller stages. Specifically, we do this: - Combine the various sorts of inputs (changes, context, inlines, etc.) into a single, relatively homogenous list of "primitives". This happens in the base class. - The primitive types are: old (diff left side), new (diff right side), context ("show more context"), no-context ("context not available") and inline (inline comment). - Possibly, apply a filtering/reordering step to the primitives to get them ready for 1-up rendering. This mostly removes information, and does a small amount of reordering. This also happens in the base class. - Pass the primitives to the actual renderer, to convert them into HTML, text, or whatever else. This happens in the leaf class. The primitive implementation is not yet complete (it doesn't attach as much information to the primitives as it should -- stuff like coverage and copies), but covers the basics. The existing HTMLTwoUp renderer does not use the primitive path; instead, it still goes down the old path. Test Plan: Ran unit tests, looked at a bunch of diffs. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2009 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4421
2013-01-14 23:20:06 +01:00
'DifferentialChangesetTestRenderer' => 'applications/differential/render/DifferentialChangesetTestRenderer.php',
'DifferentialChangesetTwoUpRenderer' => 'applications/differential/render/DifferentialChangesetTwoUpRenderer.php',
Implement basic one-up and test renderers Summary: This is a half-step toward one-up and test renderers. This is mostly a structural change, and has no user-facing impact. It splits the rendering hierarchy like this: - Renderer (more methods are abstract than before) - HTML Renderer (most HTML stuff has moved down from the base to here) - HTML 1-up (placeholder only -- not yet a functional implementation) - HTML 2-up (minimal changes, uses mostly old code) - Test Renderer (unit-testable renderer base, implements text versions of the HTML stuff) - Test 1-up (selects 1-up mode for test rendering) - Test 2-up (selects 2-up mode for test rendering) Broadly, I'm trying to share as much code as possible by splitting rendering into more, smaller stages. Specifically, we do this: - Combine the various sorts of inputs (changes, context, inlines, etc.) into a single, relatively homogenous list of "primitives". This happens in the base class. - The primitive types are: old (diff left side), new (diff right side), context ("show more context"), no-context ("context not available") and inline (inline comment). - Possibly, apply a filtering/reordering step to the primitives to get them ready for 1-up rendering. This mostly removes information, and does a small amount of reordering. This also happens in the base class. - Pass the primitives to the actual renderer, to convert them into HTML, text, or whatever else. This happens in the leaf class. The primitive implementation is not yet complete (it doesn't attach as much information to the primitives as it should -- stuff like coverage and copies), but covers the basics. The existing HTMLTwoUp renderer does not use the primitive path; instead, it still goes down the old path. Test Plan: Ran unit tests, looked at a bunch of diffs. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2009 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4421
2013-01-14 23:20:06 +01:00
'DifferentialChangesetTwoUpTestRenderer' => 'applications/differential/render/DifferentialChangesetTwoUpTestRenderer.php',
'DifferentialChangesetViewController' => 'applications/differential/controller/DifferentialChangesetViewController.php',
'DifferentialCloseConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialCloseConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialCommentPreviewController' => 'applications/differential/controller/DifferentialCommentPreviewController.php',
'DifferentialCommentSaveController' => 'applications/differential/controller/DifferentialCommentSaveController.php',
'DifferentialCommitMessageParser' => 'applications/differential/parser/DifferentialCommitMessageParser.php',
'DifferentialCommitMessageParserTestCase' => 'applications/differential/parser/__tests__/DifferentialCommitMessageParserTestCase.php',
'DifferentialCommitsField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialCommitsField.php',
'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialConflictsField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialConflictsField.php',
'DifferentialController' => 'applications/differential/controller/DifferentialController.php',
'DifferentialCoreCustomField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialCoreCustomField.php',
'DifferentialCreateCommentConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialCreateCommentConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialCreateDiffConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialCreateDiffConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialCreateInlineConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialCreateInlineConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialCreateMailReceiver' => 'applications/differential/mail/DifferentialCreateMailReceiver.php',
'DifferentialCreateRawDiffConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialCreateRawDiffConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialCreateRevisionConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialCreateRevisionConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialCustomField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialCustomField.php',
'DifferentialCustomFieldDependsOnParser' => 'applications/differential/parser/DifferentialCustomFieldDependsOnParser.php',
'DifferentialCustomFieldDependsOnParserTestCase' => 'applications/differential/parser/__tests__/DifferentialCustomFieldDependsOnParserTestCase.php',
'DifferentialCustomFieldNumericIndex' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialCustomFieldNumericIndex.php',
'DifferentialCustomFieldRevertsParser' => 'applications/differential/parser/DifferentialCustomFieldRevertsParser.php',
'DifferentialCustomFieldRevertsParserTestCase' => 'applications/differential/parser/__tests__/DifferentialCustomFieldRevertsParserTestCase.php',
'DifferentialCustomFieldStorage' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialCustomFieldStorage.php',
'DifferentialCustomFieldStringIndex' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialCustomFieldStringIndex.php',
'DifferentialDAO' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialDAO.php',
'DifferentialDefaultViewCapability' => 'applications/differential/capability/DifferentialDefaultViewCapability.php',
'DifferentialDependenciesField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialDependenciesField.php',
'DifferentialDependsOnField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialDependsOnField.php',
'DifferentialDiff' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialDiff.php',
'DifferentialDiffAffectedFilesHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialDiffAffectedFilesHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialDiffAuthorHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialDiffAuthorHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialDiffAuthorProjectsHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialDiffAuthorProjectsHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialDiffContentAddedHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialDiffContentAddedHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialDiffContentHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialDiffContentHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialDiffContentRemovedHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialDiffContentRemovedHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialDiffCreateController' => 'applications/differential/controller/DifferentialDiffCreateController.php',
'DifferentialDiffEditor' => 'applications/differential/editor/DifferentialDiffEditor.php',
'DifferentialDiffHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialDiffHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialDiffHeraldFieldGroup' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialDiffHeraldFieldGroup.php',
'DifferentialDiffInlineCommentQuery' => 'applications/differential/query/DifferentialDiffInlineCommentQuery.php',
'DifferentialDiffPHIDType' => 'applications/differential/phid/DifferentialDiffPHIDType.php',
'DifferentialDiffProperty' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialDiffProperty.php',
'DifferentialDiffQuery' => 'applications/differential/query/DifferentialDiffQuery.php',
'DifferentialDiffRepositoryHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialDiffRepositoryHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialDiffRepositoryProjectsHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialDiffRepositoryProjectsHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialDiffTestCase' => 'applications/differential/storage/__tests__/DifferentialDiffTestCase.php',
'DifferentialDiffTransaction' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialDiffTransaction.php',
Add "Autoplans" to Harbormaster Summary: Ref T8095. Two general problems: - I want Harbormaster to own all lint and unit test results. - I don't want users to have to configure anything for `arc` to keep working automatically. These are in conflict because generic lint/unit test ownership in Harbormaster requires that build targets exist which we can attach build results to. However, we can't currently create build targets on demand: Harbormaster assumes it is responsible for creating targets, then running code or making third-party service calls to actually run the builds. I considered two broad approaches to let `arc` push results into Harbormaster without requiring administrators to configure some kind of "arc results" build plan: # Add magic target PHIDs like `PHID-MAGIC-this-is-really-arc-unit`. # Add new code to build real targets with real PHIDs. (1) is probably a bit less work to get off the ground, but I think it's worse overall and very likely to create more problems in the long run. I particularly worry that it will lead to a small amount of special casing in a very large number of places, which seems more fragile. (2) is more work upfront but I think does a better job of putting all the special casing in one place that we can, e.g., more reasonably unit test, and letting the rest of the code rarely/never care about this case since it's just dealing with normal plans/steps/targets as far as it can tell. This diff introduces "autoplans", which are source templates for plans/steps. This let us "push" these targets into Harbormaster. Hypthetically, any process "like" arc can use autoplans to upload test/lint/etc results. In practice, probably only `arc` will ever use this, but I think it's still quite a bit cleaner than the alternative despite all the generality. Workflow is basically: - `arc` creates a diff. - `arc` calls `harbormaster.queryautotargets`, passing the diff PHID and saying "I have some lint and unit results I want to stick on this thing". - Harbormaster builds the plan, steps, and targets (if any of them don't already exist), and hands back the target PHIDs so `arc` has a completely standard-looking place to put results. - `arc` uploads the test results to the right targets, as though Harbormaster had asked it to run unit/lint in the first place. (This doesn't actually do any of that yet, just sets things up.) I'll maybe doc turn that ^^^^^^ into a doc for posterity since I think it's hard to guess what an "autotarget" is, but I'm going to grab some lunch first. Test Plan: - Added unit tests to make sure we can build these things properly. - Used `harbormaster.queryautotargets` to build autotargets for a bunch of diffs. - Verified targets come up in "waiting for message" state. - Verified plans and steps are not editable. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T8095 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13345
2015-06-21 18:04:21 +02:00
'DifferentialDiffTransactionQuery' => 'applications/differential/query/DifferentialDiffTransactionQuery.php',
'DifferentialDiffViewController' => 'applications/differential/controller/DifferentialDiffViewController.php',
'DifferentialDoorkeeperRevisionFeedStoryPublisher' => 'applications/differential/doorkeeper/DifferentialDoorkeeperRevisionFeedStoryPublisher.php',
'DifferentialDraft' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialDraft.php',
'DifferentialEditPolicyField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialEditPolicyField.php',
'DifferentialFieldParseException' => 'applications/differential/exception/DifferentialFieldParseException.php',
'DifferentialFieldValidationException' => 'applications/differential/exception/DifferentialFieldValidationException.php',
'DifferentialFindConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialFindConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialGetAllDiffsConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialGetAllDiffsConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialGetCommitMessageConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialGetCommitMessageConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialGetCommitPathsConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialGetCommitPathsConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialGetDiffConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialGetDiffConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialGetRawDiffConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialGetRawDiffConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialGetRevisionCommentsConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialGetRevisionCommentsConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialGetRevisionConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialGetRevisionConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialGetWorkingCopy' => 'applications/differential/DifferentialGetWorkingCopy.php',
'DifferentialGitHubLandingStrategy' => 'applications/differential/landing/DifferentialGitHubLandingStrategy.php',
'DifferentialGitSVNIDField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialGitSVNIDField.php',
'DifferentialHarbormasterField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialHarbormasterField.php',
'DifferentialHiddenComment' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialHiddenComment.php',
'DifferentialHostField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialHostField.php',
'DifferentialHostedGitLandingStrategy' => 'applications/differential/landing/DifferentialHostedGitLandingStrategy.php',
'DifferentialHostedMercurialLandingStrategy' => 'applications/differential/landing/DifferentialHostedMercurialLandingStrategy.php',
'DifferentialHovercardEventListener' => 'applications/differential/event/DifferentialHovercardEventListener.php',
'DifferentialHunk' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialHunk.php',
'DifferentialHunkParser' => 'applications/differential/parser/DifferentialHunkParser.php',
'DifferentialHunkParserTestCase' => 'applications/differential/parser/__tests__/DifferentialHunkParserTestCase.php',
'DifferentialHunkQuery' => 'applications/differential/query/DifferentialHunkQuery.php',
'DifferentialHunkTestCase' => 'applications/differential/storage/__tests__/DifferentialHunkTestCase.php',
'DifferentialInlineComment' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialInlineComment.php',
'DifferentialInlineCommentEditController' => 'applications/differential/controller/DifferentialInlineCommentEditController.php',
'DifferentialInlineCommentPreviewController' => 'applications/differential/controller/DifferentialInlineCommentPreviewController.php',
'DifferentialInlineCommentQuery' => 'applications/differential/query/DifferentialInlineCommentQuery.php',
'DifferentialJIRAIssuesField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialJIRAIssuesField.php',
'DifferentialLandingActionMenuEventListener' => 'applications/differential/landing/DifferentialLandingActionMenuEventListener.php',
'DifferentialLandingStrategy' => 'applications/differential/landing/DifferentialLandingStrategy.php',
'DifferentialLegacyHunk' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialLegacyHunk.php',
'DifferentialLineAdjustmentMap' => 'applications/differential/parser/DifferentialLineAdjustmentMap.php',
'DifferentialLintField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialLintField.php',
'DifferentialLintStatus' => 'applications/differential/constants/DifferentialLintStatus.php',
'DifferentialLocalCommitsView' => 'applications/differential/view/DifferentialLocalCommitsView.php',
'DifferentialManiphestTasksField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialManiphestTasksField.php',
'DifferentialModernHunk' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialModernHunk.php',
'DifferentialNextStepField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialNextStepField.php',
'DifferentialParseCacheGarbageCollector' => 'applications/differential/garbagecollector/DifferentialParseCacheGarbageCollector.php',
'DifferentialParseCommitMessageConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialParseCommitMessageConduitAPIMethod.php',
Implement basic one-up and test renderers Summary: This is a half-step toward one-up and test renderers. This is mostly a structural change, and has no user-facing impact. It splits the rendering hierarchy like this: - Renderer (more methods are abstract than before) - HTML Renderer (most HTML stuff has moved down from the base to here) - HTML 1-up (placeholder only -- not yet a functional implementation) - HTML 2-up (minimal changes, uses mostly old code) - Test Renderer (unit-testable renderer base, implements text versions of the HTML stuff) - Test 1-up (selects 1-up mode for test rendering) - Test 2-up (selects 2-up mode for test rendering) Broadly, I'm trying to share as much code as possible by splitting rendering into more, smaller stages. Specifically, we do this: - Combine the various sorts of inputs (changes, context, inlines, etc.) into a single, relatively homogenous list of "primitives". This happens in the base class. - The primitive types are: old (diff left side), new (diff right side), context ("show more context"), no-context ("context not available") and inline (inline comment). - Possibly, apply a filtering/reordering step to the primitives to get them ready for 1-up rendering. This mostly removes information, and does a small amount of reordering. This also happens in the base class. - Pass the primitives to the actual renderer, to convert them into HTML, text, or whatever else. This happens in the leaf class. The primitive implementation is not yet complete (it doesn't attach as much information to the primitives as it should -- stuff like coverage and copies), but covers the basics. The existing HTMLTwoUp renderer does not use the primitive path; instead, it still goes down the old path. Test Plan: Ran unit tests, looked at a bunch of diffs. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2009 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4421
2013-01-14 23:20:06 +01:00
'DifferentialParseRenderTestCase' => 'applications/differential/__tests__/DifferentialParseRenderTestCase.php',
'DifferentialPathField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialPathField.php',
'DifferentialPrimaryPaneView' => 'applications/differential/view/DifferentialPrimaryPaneView.php',
'DifferentialProjectReviewersField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialProjectReviewersField.php',
'DifferentialProjectsField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialProjectsField.php',
'DifferentialQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialQueryDiffsConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialQueryDiffsConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialRawDiffRenderer' => 'applications/differential/render/DifferentialRawDiffRenderer.php',
'DifferentialReleephRequestFieldSpecification' => 'applications/releeph/differential/DifferentialReleephRequestFieldSpecification.php',
'DifferentialRemarkupRule' => 'applications/differential/remarkup/DifferentialRemarkupRule.php',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'DifferentialReplyHandler' => 'applications/differential/mail/DifferentialReplyHandler.php',
'DifferentialRepositoryField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialRepositoryField.php',
'DifferentialRepositoryLookup' => 'applications/differential/query/DifferentialRepositoryLookup.php',
Allow Herald to "Require legal signatures" for reviews Summary: Ref T3116. Add a Herald action "Require legal signatures" which requires revision authors to accept legal agreements before their revisions can be accepted. - Herald will check which documents the author has signed, and trigger a "you have to sign X, Y, Z" for other documents. - If the author has already signed everything, we don't spam the revision -- basically, this only triggers when signatures are missing. - The UI will show which documents must be signed and warn that the revision can't be accepted until they're completed. - Users aren't allowed to "Accept" the revision until documents are cleared. Fixes T1157. The original install making the request (Hive) no longer uses Phabricator, and this satisfies our requirements. Test Plan: - Added a Herald rule. - Created a revision, saw the rule trigger. - Viewed as author and non-author, saw field UI (generic for non-author, specific for author), transaction UI, and accept-warning UI. - Tried to accept revision. - Signed document, saw UI update. Note that signatures don't currently //push// an update to the revision, but could eventually (like blocking tasks work). - Accepted revision. - Created another revision, saw rules not add the document (since it's already signed, this is the "no spam" case). Reviewers: btrahan, chad Reviewed By: chad Subscribers: asherkin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T1157, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9771
2014-06-29 16:53:53 +02:00
'DifferentialRequiredSignaturesField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialRequiredSignaturesField.php',
'DifferentialRevertPlanField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialRevertPlanField.php',
'DifferentialReviewedByField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialReviewedByField.php',
'DifferentialReviewer' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialReviewer.php',
'DifferentialReviewerForRevisionEdgeType' => 'applications/differential/edge/DifferentialReviewerForRevisionEdgeType.php',
'DifferentialReviewerStatus' => 'applications/differential/constants/DifferentialReviewerStatus.php',
'DifferentialReviewersAddBlockingReviewersHeraldAction' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialReviewersAddBlockingReviewersHeraldAction.php',
'DifferentialReviewersAddBlockingSelfHeraldAction' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialReviewersAddBlockingSelfHeraldAction.php',
'DifferentialReviewersAddReviewersHeraldAction' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialReviewersAddReviewersHeraldAction.php',
'DifferentialReviewersAddSelfHeraldAction' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialReviewersAddSelfHeraldAction.php',
'DifferentialReviewersField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialReviewersField.php',
'DifferentialReviewersHeraldAction' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialReviewersHeraldAction.php',
'DifferentialReviewersView' => 'applications/differential/view/DifferentialReviewersView.php',
'DifferentialRevision' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialRevision.php',
'DifferentialRevisionAffectedFilesHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialRevisionAffectedFilesHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialRevisionAuthorHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialRevisionAuthorHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialRevisionAuthorProjectsHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialRevisionAuthorProjectsHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialRevisionCloseDetailsController' => 'applications/differential/controller/DifferentialRevisionCloseDetailsController.php',
'DifferentialRevisionContentAddedHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialRevisionContentAddedHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialRevisionContentHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialRevisionContentHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialRevisionContentRemovedHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialRevisionContentRemovedHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialRevisionControlSystem' => 'applications/differential/constants/DifferentialRevisionControlSystem.php',
'DifferentialRevisionDependedOnByRevisionEdgeType' => 'applications/differential/edge/DifferentialRevisionDependedOnByRevisionEdgeType.php',
'DifferentialRevisionDependsOnRevisionEdgeType' => 'applications/differential/edge/DifferentialRevisionDependsOnRevisionEdgeType.php',
'DifferentialRevisionDetailView' => 'applications/differential/view/DifferentialRevisionDetailView.php',
'DifferentialRevisionEditController' => 'applications/differential/controller/DifferentialRevisionEditController.php',
'DifferentialRevisionHasCommitEdgeType' => 'applications/differential/edge/DifferentialRevisionHasCommitEdgeType.php',
'DifferentialRevisionHasReviewerEdgeType' => 'applications/differential/edge/DifferentialRevisionHasReviewerEdgeType.php',
'DifferentialRevisionHasTaskEdgeType' => 'applications/differential/edge/DifferentialRevisionHasTaskEdgeType.php',
'DifferentialRevisionHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialRevisionHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialRevisionHeraldFieldGroup' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialRevisionHeraldFieldGroup.php',
'DifferentialRevisionIDField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialRevisionIDField.php',
'DifferentialRevisionLandController' => 'applications/differential/controller/DifferentialRevisionLandController.php',
'DifferentialRevisionListController' => 'applications/differential/controller/DifferentialRevisionListController.php',
'DifferentialRevisionListView' => 'applications/differential/view/DifferentialRevisionListView.php',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'DifferentialRevisionMailReceiver' => 'applications/differential/mail/DifferentialRevisionMailReceiver.php',
'DifferentialRevisionOperationController' => 'applications/differential/controller/DifferentialRevisionOperationController.php',
'DifferentialRevisionPHIDType' => 'applications/differential/phid/DifferentialRevisionPHIDType.php',
'DifferentialRevisionPackageHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialRevisionPackageHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialRevisionPackageOwnerHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialRevisionPackageOwnerHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialRevisionQuery' => 'applications/differential/query/DifferentialRevisionQuery.php',
'DifferentialRevisionRepositoryHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialRevisionRepositoryHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialRevisionRepositoryProjectsHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialRevisionRepositoryProjectsHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialRevisionReviewersHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialRevisionReviewersHeraldField.php',
Use ApplicationSearch in Differential Summary: Ref T603. Ref T2625. Fixes T3241. Depends on D5451. Depends on D6346. @wez, this changes the Differential revision list UI substantially and may generate a lot of bikeshedding / who-moved-my-cheese churn. See T3417 for context, for example. The motivations for this change are: - The list now works on devices, like phones and tablets. This is a requirement to make the rest of Differential work on devices. - Although ApplicationSearch intentionally presents a simpler interface initially and some options which were one click away before aren't now, it is much more powerful than the search it replaces and allows users to build, save, share, fork, edit, and customize a much wider range of queries. Users who used the old filters frequently can use Advanced Search -> Save Custom Query to create new versions of them, and of any other query. "Edit Queries.." allows users to remove and reorder queries, including builtin queries. Basically, there are like three things which have gone from "1-click" to "a few clicks", and ten trillion things which have gone from "hard/impossible" to "relatively easy". The local screenshots look a bit iffy, but I think a lot of this is the fakenesss of my test data. If they still feel iffy in production we can tweak them until they feel good, like we did for Maniphest. Test Plan: {F48477} {F48478} Reviewers: btrahan, chad, wez Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, s Maniphest Tasks: T603, T2625, T3241 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6347
2013-07-03 15:11:07 +02:00
'DifferentialRevisionSearchEngine' => 'applications/differential/query/DifferentialRevisionSearchEngine.php',
'DifferentialRevisionStatus' => 'applications/differential/constants/DifferentialRevisionStatus.php',
'DifferentialRevisionSummaryHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialRevisionSummaryHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialRevisionTitleHeraldField' => 'applications/differential/herald/DifferentialRevisionTitleHeraldField.php',
'DifferentialRevisionUpdateHistoryView' => 'applications/differential/view/DifferentialRevisionUpdateHistoryView.php',
'DifferentialRevisionViewController' => 'applications/differential/controller/DifferentialRevisionViewController.php',
'DifferentialSchemaSpec' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialSchemaSpec.php',
Improve Search architecture Summary: The search indexing API has several problems right now: - Always runs in-process. - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it. - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster. - Instead, make the API phid-oriented. - No uniform indexing API. - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird. - Instead, provide a uniform API. - No uniform CLI. - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers. - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing. - Not application-oriented. - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world. - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader. Test Plan: - `bin/search index` - Indexed one revision, one task. - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types. - Indexed `--all`. - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it. - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing. - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing. - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: 20after4, aran Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 23:21:31 +01:00
'DifferentialSearchIndexer' => 'applications/differential/search/DifferentialSearchIndexer.php',
'DifferentialSetDiffPropertyConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialSetDiffPropertyConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialStoredCustomField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialStoredCustomField.php',
'DifferentialSubscribersField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialSubscribersField.php',
'DifferentialSummaryField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialSummaryField.php',
'DifferentialTestPlanField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialTestPlanField.php',
'DifferentialTitleField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialTitleField.php',
'DifferentialTransaction' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialTransaction.php',
'DifferentialTransactionComment' => 'applications/differential/storage/DifferentialTransactionComment.php',
'DifferentialTransactionEditor' => 'applications/differential/editor/DifferentialTransactionEditor.php',
Migrate Differential comments to ApplicationTransactions Summary: Ref T2222. This is the big one. This migrates each `DifferentialComment` to one or more ApplicationTransactions (action, cc, reviewers, update, comment, inlines), and makes `DifferentialComment` a double-reader for ApplicationTransactions. The migration is pretty straightforward: - If a comment took an action not otherwise covered, it gets an "action" transaction. This is something like "epriestley abandoned this revision.". - If a comment updated the diff, it gets an "updated diff" transaction. Very old transactions of this type may not have a diff ID (probably only at Facebook). - If a comment added or removed reviewers, it gets a "changed reviewers" transaction. - If a comment added CCs, it gets a "subscribers" transaction. - If a comment added comment text, it gets a "comment" transaction. - For each inline attached to a comment, we generate an "inline" transaction. Most comments generate a small number of transactions, but a few generate a significant number. At HEAD, the code is basically already doing this, so comments in the last day or two already obey these rules, roughly, and will all generate only one transaction (except inlines). Because we've already preallocated PHIDs in the comment text table, we only need to write to the transaction table. NOTE: This significantly degrades Differential, making inline comments pretty much useless (they each get their own transaction, and don't show line numbers or files). The data is all fine, but the UI is garbage now. This needs to be fixed before we can deploy this to users, but it's easily separable since it's all just display code. Specifically, they look like this: {F112270} Test Plan: I've migrated locally and put things through their paces, but it's hard to catch sketchy stuff locally because most of my test data is nonsense and bad migrations wouldn't necessarily look out of place. IMPORTANT: I'm planning to push this to a branch and then shift production over to the branch, and run it for a day or two before bringing it to master. I generally feel good about this change: it's not that big since we were able to separate a lot of pieces out of it, and it's pretty straightforward. That said, it's still one of the most scary/dangerous changes we've ever made. Reviewers: btrahan CC: chad, aran Maniphest Tasks: T2222 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8210
2014-02-12 00:36:58 +01:00
'DifferentialTransactionQuery' => 'applications/differential/query/DifferentialTransactionQuery.php',
'DifferentialTransactionView' => 'applications/differential/view/DifferentialTransactionView.php',
'DifferentialUnitField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialUnitField.php',
'DifferentialUnitStatus' => 'applications/differential/constants/DifferentialUnitStatus.php',
'DifferentialUnitTestResult' => 'applications/differential/constants/DifferentialUnitTestResult.php',
'DifferentialUpdateRevisionConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/differential/conduit/DifferentialUpdateRevisionConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DifferentialViewPolicyField' => 'applications/differential/customfield/DifferentialViewPolicyField.php',
'DiffusionAuditorDatasource' => 'applications/diffusion/typeahead/DiffusionAuditorDatasource.php',
'DiffusionAuditorFunctionDatasource' => 'applications/diffusion/typeahead/DiffusionAuditorFunctionDatasource.php',
'DiffusionAuditorsAddAuditorsHeraldAction' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionAuditorsAddAuditorsHeraldAction.php',
'DiffusionAuditorsAddSelfHeraldAction' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionAuditorsAddSelfHeraldAction.php',
'DiffusionAuditorsHeraldAction' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionAuditorsHeraldAction.php',
'DiffusionBlockHeraldAction' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionBlockHeraldAction.php',
'DiffusionBranchQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionBranchQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionBranchTableController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionBranchTableController.php',
'DiffusionBranchTableView' => 'applications/diffusion/view/DiffusionBranchTableView.php',
'DiffusionBrowseController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionBrowseController.php',
'DiffusionBrowseDirectoryController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionBrowseDirectoryController.php',
'DiffusionBrowseFileController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionBrowseFileController.php',
'DiffusionBrowseMainController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionBrowseMainController.php',
'DiffusionBrowseQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionBrowseQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionBrowseResultSet' => 'applications/diffusion/data/DiffusionBrowseResultSet.php',
'DiffusionBrowseSearchController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionBrowseSearchController.php',
'DiffusionBrowseTableView' => 'applications/diffusion/view/DiffusionBrowseTableView.php',
'DiffusionCachedResolveRefsQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/DiffusionCachedResolveRefsQuery.php',
'DiffusionChangeController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionChangeController.php',
'DiffusionChangeHeraldFieldGroup' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionChangeHeraldFieldGroup.php',
'DiffusionCommitAffectedFilesHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitAffectedFilesHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitAuthorHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitAuthorHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitAutocloseHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitAutocloseHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitBranchesController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionCommitBranchesController.php',
'DiffusionCommitBranchesHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitBranchesHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitCommitterHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitCommitterHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionCommitController.php',
'DiffusionCommitDiffContentAddedHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitDiffContentAddedHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitDiffContentHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitDiffContentHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitDiffContentRemovedHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitDiffContentRemovedHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitDiffEnormousHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitDiffEnormousHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitEditController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionCommitEditController.php',
'DiffusionCommitHasRevisionEdgeType' => 'applications/diffusion/edge/DiffusionCommitHasRevisionEdgeType.php',
'DiffusionCommitHasTaskEdgeType' => 'applications/diffusion/edge/DiffusionCommitHasTaskEdgeType.php',
'DiffusionCommitHash' => 'applications/diffusion/data/DiffusionCommitHash.php',
'DiffusionCommitHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitHeraldFieldGroup' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitHeraldFieldGroup.php',
'DiffusionCommitHookEngine' => 'applications/diffusion/engine/DiffusionCommitHookEngine.php',
Reject dangerous changes in Git repositories by default Summary: Ref T4189. This adds a per-repository "dangerous changes" flag, which defaults to off. This flag must be enabled to do non-appending branch mutation (delete branches / rewrite history). Test Plan: With flag on and off, performed various safe and dangerous pushes. >>> orbital ~/repos/POEMS $ git push origin :blarp remote: +---------------------------------------------------------------+ remote: | * * * PUSH REJECTED BY EVIL DRAGON BUREAUCRATS * * * | remote: +---------------------------------------------------------------+ remote: \ remote: \ ^ /^ remote: \ / \ // \ remote: \ |\___/| / \// .\ remote: \ /V V \__ / // | \ \ *----* remote: / / \/_/ // | \ \ \ | remote: @___@` \/_ // | \ \ \/\ \ remote: 0/0/| \/_ // | \ \ \ \ remote: 0/0/0/0/| \/// | \ \ | | remote: 0/0/0/0/0/_|_ / ( // | \ _\ | / remote: 0/0/0/0/0/0/`/,_ _ _/ ) ; -. | _ _\.-~ / / remote: ,-} _ *-.|.-~-. .~ ~ remote: \ \__/ `/\ / ~-. _ .-~ / remote: \____(Oo) *. } { / remote: ( (--) .----~-.\ \-` .~ remote: //__\\ \ DENIED! ///.----..< \ _ -~ remote: // \\ ///-._ _ _ _ _ _ _{^ - - - - ~ remote: remote: remote: DANGEROUS CHANGE: The change you're attempting to push deletes the branch 'blarp'. remote: Dangerous change protection is enabled for this repository. remote: Edit the repository configuration before making dangerous changes. remote: To ssh://dweller@localhost/diffusion/POEMS/ ! [remote rejected] blarp (pre-receive hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://dweller@localhost/diffusion/POEMS/' Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, chad, richardvanvelzen Maniphest Tasks: T4189 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7689
2013-12-03 19:28:39 +01:00
'DiffusionCommitHookRejectException' => 'applications/diffusion/exception/DiffusionCommitHookRejectException.php',
'DiffusionCommitMergeHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitMergeHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitMessageHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitMessageHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitPackageAuditHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitPackageAuditHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitPackageHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitPackageHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitPackageOwnerHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitPackageOwnerHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitParentsQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionCommitParentsQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionCommitQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/DiffusionCommitQuery.php',
'DiffusionCommitRef' => 'applications/diffusion/data/DiffusionCommitRef.php',
'DiffusionCommitRemarkupRule' => 'applications/diffusion/remarkup/DiffusionCommitRemarkupRule.php',
'DiffusionCommitRemarkupRuleTestCase' => 'applications/diffusion/remarkup/__tests__/DiffusionCommitRemarkupRuleTestCase.php',
'DiffusionCommitRepositoryHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitRepositoryHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitRepositoryProjectsHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitRepositoryProjectsHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitRevertedByCommitEdgeType' => 'applications/diffusion/edge/DiffusionCommitRevertedByCommitEdgeType.php',
'DiffusionCommitRevertsCommitEdgeType' => 'applications/diffusion/edge/DiffusionCommitRevertsCommitEdgeType.php',
'DiffusionCommitReviewerHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitReviewerHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitRevisionAcceptedHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitRevisionAcceptedHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitRevisionHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitRevisionHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitRevisionReviewersHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitRevisionReviewersHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitRevisionSubscribersHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionCommitRevisionSubscribersHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionCommitTagsController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionCommitTagsController.php',
'DiffusionConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionController.php',
'DiffusionCreateCommentConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionCreateCommentConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionCreateRepositoriesCapability' => 'applications/diffusion/capability/DiffusionCreateRepositoriesCapability.php',
'DiffusionDefaultEditCapability' => 'applications/diffusion/capability/DiffusionDefaultEditCapability.php',
'DiffusionDefaultPushCapability' => 'applications/diffusion/capability/DiffusionDefaultPushCapability.php',
'DiffusionDefaultViewCapability' => 'applications/diffusion/capability/DiffusionDefaultViewCapability.php',
'DiffusionDiffController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionDiffController.php',
'DiffusionDiffInlineCommentQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/DiffusionDiffInlineCommentQuery.php',
'DiffusionDiffQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionDiffQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionDoorkeeperCommitFeedStoryPublisher' => 'applications/diffusion/doorkeeper/DiffusionDoorkeeperCommitFeedStoryPublisher.php',
'DiffusionEmptyResultView' => 'applications/diffusion/view/DiffusionEmptyResultView.php',
'DiffusionExistsQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionExistsQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionExternalController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionExternalController.php',
'DiffusionExternalSymbolQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/symbol/DiffusionExternalSymbolQuery.php',
'DiffusionExternalSymbolsSource' => 'applications/diffusion/symbol/DiffusionExternalSymbolsSource.php',
'DiffusionFileContent' => 'applications/diffusion/data/DiffusionFileContent.php',
'DiffusionFileContentQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/filecontent/DiffusionFileContentQuery.php',
'DiffusionFileContentQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionFileContentQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionFindSymbolsConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionFindSymbolsConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionGetCommitsConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionGetCommitsConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionGetLintMessagesConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionGetLintMessagesConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionGetRecentCommitsByPathConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionGetRecentCommitsByPathConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionGitBranch' => 'applications/diffusion/data/DiffusionGitBranch.php',
'DiffusionGitBranchTestCase' => 'applications/diffusion/data/__tests__/DiffusionGitBranchTestCase.php',
'DiffusionGitFileContentQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/filecontent/DiffusionGitFileContentQuery.php',
'DiffusionGitFileContentQueryTestCase' => 'applications/diffusion/query/__tests__/DiffusionGitFileContentQueryTestCase.php',
'DiffusionGitRawDiffQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/rawdiff/DiffusionGitRawDiffQuery.php',
'DiffusionGitReceivePackSSHWorkflow' => 'applications/diffusion/ssh/DiffusionGitReceivePackSSHWorkflow.php',
'DiffusionGitRequest' => 'applications/diffusion/request/DiffusionGitRequest.php',
'DiffusionGitResponse' => 'applications/diffusion/response/DiffusionGitResponse.php',
'DiffusionGitSSHWorkflow' => 'applications/diffusion/ssh/DiffusionGitSSHWorkflow.php',
'DiffusionGitUploadPackSSHWorkflow' => 'applications/diffusion/ssh/DiffusionGitUploadPackSSHWorkflow.php',
'DiffusionHistoryController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionHistoryController.php',
'DiffusionHistoryQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionHistoryQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionHistoryTableView' => 'applications/diffusion/view/DiffusionHistoryTableView.php',
'DiffusionHovercardEventListener' => 'applications/diffusion/events/DiffusionHovercardEventListener.php',
'DiffusionInlineCommentController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionInlineCommentController.php',
'DiffusionInlineCommentPreviewController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionInlineCommentPreviewController.php',
'DiffusionLastModifiedController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionLastModifiedController.php',
'DiffusionLastModifiedQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionLastModifiedQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionLintController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionLintController.php',
'DiffusionLintCountQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/DiffusionLintCountQuery.php',
'DiffusionLintDetailsController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionLintDetailsController.php',
'DiffusionLintSaveRunner' => 'applications/diffusion/DiffusionLintSaveRunner.php',
'DiffusionLookSoonConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionLookSoonConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionLowLevelCommitFieldsQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/lowlevel/DiffusionLowLevelCommitFieldsQuery.php',
'DiffusionLowLevelCommitQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/lowlevel/DiffusionLowLevelCommitQuery.php',
'DiffusionLowLevelGitRefQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/lowlevel/DiffusionLowLevelGitRefQuery.php',
'DiffusionLowLevelMercurialBranchesQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/lowlevel/DiffusionLowLevelMercurialBranchesQuery.php',
'DiffusionLowLevelMercurialPathsQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/lowlevel/DiffusionLowLevelMercurialPathsQuery.php',
Conditionally use `hg files` vs. `hg locate` depending on version of Mercurial Summary: In Mercurial 3.2 the `locate` command was deprecated in favor of `files` command. This change updates the DiffusionLowLevelMercurialPathsQuery command to conditionally use `locate` or `files` based on the version of Mercurial used. Closes T7375 Test Plan: My test/develop Phabricator instance is setup to run Mercurial 3.5.1. The test procedure to verify valid file listings are being returned: 1. I navigated to `http://192.168.0.133/conduit/method/diffusion.querypaths/` 2. I populated the following fields: - path: `"/"` - commit: `"d721d5b57fc9ef72e47ff9d4e0c583d74a46590c"` - callsign: `"HGTEST"` 3. I submitted request and verified that result contained all files in the repository: ``` { "0": "README", "1": "alpha/beta/trifle", "2": "test/Chupacabra.cow", "3": "test/socket.ks" } ``` I repeated the above steps after setting up Mercurial 2.6.2, which I installed in the following manner: 1. I downloaded Mercurial 2.6.2 source and run `make local` which will only compile it to work from its own directory (`/opt/mercurial-2.6.2`) 2. I linked `/usr/local/bin/hg -> /opt/mercurial-2.6.2/hg` (there's also a `/usr/bin/hg` which is a link to `/usr/local/bin/hg`) 3. I navigated to my home directory and verify that `hg --version` returns 2.6.2. 4. I restarted phabricator services (probably unnecessary). With the Multimeter application active 1. I verified that `/usr/local/bin/hg` referred to version 2.6 2. I ran the same conduit call from the conduit application 3. I verified that `http://192.168.0.133/multimeter/?type=2&group=label` incremented values for `bin.hg locate`. 4. I swapped out mercurial versions for 3.5.1 5. I ran the same conduit call from the conduit application 6. I verified that `http://192.168.0.133/multimeter/?type=2&group=label` incremented values for `bin.hg files` Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers Subscribers: Korvin Maniphest Tasks: T7375 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14253
2015-10-13 02:50:26 +02:00
'DiffusionLowLevelMercurialPathsQueryTests' => 'applications/diffusion/query/lowlevel/__tests__/DiffusionLowLevelMercurialPathsQueryTests.php',
'DiffusionLowLevelParentsQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/lowlevel/DiffusionLowLevelParentsQuery.php',
'DiffusionLowLevelQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/lowlevel/DiffusionLowLevelQuery.php',
'DiffusionLowLevelResolveRefsQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/lowlevel/DiffusionLowLevelResolveRefsQuery.php',
'DiffusionMercurialFileContentQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/filecontent/DiffusionMercurialFileContentQuery.php',
'DiffusionMercurialRawDiffQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/rawdiff/DiffusionMercurialRawDiffQuery.php',
'DiffusionMercurialRequest' => 'applications/diffusion/request/DiffusionMercurialRequest.php',
'DiffusionMercurialResponse' => 'applications/diffusion/response/DiffusionMercurialResponse.php',
'DiffusionMercurialSSHWorkflow' => 'applications/diffusion/ssh/DiffusionMercurialSSHWorkflow.php',
'DiffusionMercurialServeSSHWorkflow' => 'applications/diffusion/ssh/DiffusionMercurialServeSSHWorkflow.php',
'DiffusionMercurialWireClientSSHProtocolChannel' => 'applications/diffusion/ssh/DiffusionMercurialWireClientSSHProtocolChannel.php',
'DiffusionMercurialWireProtocol' => 'applications/diffusion/protocol/DiffusionMercurialWireProtocol.php',
'DiffusionMercurialWireProtocolTests' => 'applications/diffusion/protocol/__tests__/DiffusionMercurialWireProtocolTests.php',
'DiffusionMercurialWireSSHTestCase' => 'applications/diffusion/ssh/__tests__/DiffusionMercurialWireSSHTestCase.php',
'DiffusionMergedCommitsQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionMergedCommitsQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionMirrorDeleteController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionMirrorDeleteController.php',
'DiffusionMirrorEditController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionMirrorEditController.php',
'DiffusionPathChange' => 'applications/diffusion/data/DiffusionPathChange.php',
'DiffusionPathChangeQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/pathchange/DiffusionPathChangeQuery.php',
'DiffusionPathCompleteController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionPathCompleteController.php',
'DiffusionPathIDQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/pathid/DiffusionPathIDQuery.php',
'DiffusionPathQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/DiffusionPathQuery.php',
'DiffusionPathQueryTestCase' => 'applications/diffusion/query/pathid/__tests__/DiffusionPathQueryTestCase.php',
'DiffusionPathTreeController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionPathTreeController.php',
'DiffusionPathValidateController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionPathValidateController.php',
'DiffusionPhpExternalSymbolsSource' => 'applications/diffusion/symbol/DiffusionPhpExternalSymbolsSource.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentAffectedFilesHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentAffectedFilesHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentAuthorHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentAuthorHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentAuthorRawHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentAuthorRawHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentBranchesHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentBranchesHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentCommitterHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentCommitterHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentCommitterRawHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentCommitterRawHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentDiffContentAddedHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentDiffContentAddedHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentDiffContentHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentDiffContentHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentDiffContentRemovedHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentDiffContentRemovedHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentDiffEnormousHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentDiffEnormousHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentMergeHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentMergeHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentMessageHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentMessageHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentPusherHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentPusherHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentPusherIsCommitterHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentPusherIsCommitterHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentPusherProjectsHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentPusherProjectsHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentRepositoryHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentRepositoryHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentRepositoryProjectsHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentRepositoryProjectsHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentRevisionAcceptedHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentRevisionAcceptedHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentRevisionHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentRevisionHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentRevisionReviewersHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentRevisionReviewersHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentRevisionSubscribersHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitContentRevisionSubscribersHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefChangeHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitRefChangeHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitRefHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefHeraldFieldGroup' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitRefHeraldFieldGroup.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefNameHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitRefNameHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefPusherHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitRefPusherHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefPusherProjectsHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitRefPusherProjectsHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefRepositoryHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitRefRepositoryHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefRepositoryProjectsHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitRefRepositoryProjectsHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefTypeHeraldField' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/DiffusionPreCommitRefTypeHeraldField.php',
'DiffusionPushCapability' => 'applications/diffusion/capability/DiffusionPushCapability.php',
'DiffusionPushEventViewController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionPushEventViewController.php',
'DiffusionPushLogController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionPushLogController.php',
'DiffusionPushLogListController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionPushLogListController.php',
'DiffusionPushLogListView' => 'applications/diffusion/view/DiffusionPushLogListView.php',
'DiffusionPythonExternalSymbolsSource' => 'applications/diffusion/symbol/DiffusionPythonExternalSymbolsSource.php',
'DiffusionQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/DiffusionQuery.php',
'DiffusionQueryCommitsConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionQueryCommitsConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionQueryPathsConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionQueryPathsConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionRawDiffQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/rawdiff/DiffusionRawDiffQuery.php',
'DiffusionRawDiffQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionRawDiffQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionReadmeView' => 'applications/diffusion/view/DiffusionReadmeView.php',
'DiffusionRefDatasource' => 'applications/diffusion/typeahead/DiffusionRefDatasource.php',
'DiffusionRefNotFoundException' => 'applications/diffusion/exception/DiffusionRefNotFoundException.php',
'DiffusionRefTableController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRefTableController.php',
'DiffusionRefsQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionRefsQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionRenameHistoryQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/DiffusionRenameHistoryQuery.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryByIDRemarkupRule' => 'applications/diffusion/remarkup/DiffusionRepositoryByIDRemarkupRule.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryCreateController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryCreateController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryDatasource' => 'applications/diffusion/typeahead/DiffusionRepositoryDatasource.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryDefaultController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryDefaultController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditActionsController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryEditActionsController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditActivateController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryEditActivateController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditAutomationController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryEditAutomationController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditBasicController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryEditBasicController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditBranchesController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryEditBranchesController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryEditController.php',
Reject dangerous changes in Git repositories by default Summary: Ref T4189. This adds a per-repository "dangerous changes" flag, which defaults to off. This flag must be enabled to do non-appending branch mutation (delete branches / rewrite history). Test Plan: With flag on and off, performed various safe and dangerous pushes. >>> orbital ~/repos/POEMS $ git push origin :blarp remote: +---------------------------------------------------------------+ remote: | * * * PUSH REJECTED BY EVIL DRAGON BUREAUCRATS * * * | remote: +---------------------------------------------------------------+ remote: \ remote: \ ^ /^ remote: \ / \ // \ remote: \ |\___/| / \// .\ remote: \ /V V \__ / // | \ \ *----* remote: / / \/_/ // | \ \ \ | remote: @___@` \/_ // | \ \ \/\ \ remote: 0/0/| \/_ // | \ \ \ \ remote: 0/0/0/0/| \/// | \ \ | | remote: 0/0/0/0/0/_|_ / ( // | \ _\ | / remote: 0/0/0/0/0/0/`/,_ _ _/ ) ; -. | _ _\.-~ / / remote: ,-} _ *-.|.-~-. .~ ~ remote: \ \__/ `/\ / ~-. _ .-~ / remote: \____(Oo) *. } { / remote: ( (--) .----~-.\ \-` .~ remote: //__\\ \ DENIED! ///.----..< \ _ -~ remote: // \\ ///-._ _ _ _ _ _ _{^ - - - - ~ remote: remote: remote: DANGEROUS CHANGE: The change you're attempting to push deletes the branch 'blarp'. remote: Dangerous change protection is enabled for this repository. remote: Edit the repository configuration before making dangerous changes. remote: To ssh://dweller@localhost/diffusion/POEMS/ ! [remote rejected] blarp (pre-receive hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://dweller@localhost/diffusion/POEMS/' Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, chad, richardvanvelzen Maniphest Tasks: T4189 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7689
2013-12-03 19:28:39 +01:00
'DiffusionRepositoryEditDangerousController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryEditDangerousController.php',
2013-10-29 22:23:30 +01:00
'DiffusionRepositoryEditDeleteController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryEditDeleteController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditEncodingController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryEditEncodingController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditHostingController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryEditHostingController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditMainController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryEditMainController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditStagingController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryEditStagingController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditStorageController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryEditStorageController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditSubversionController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryEditSubversionController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditUpdateController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryEditUpdateController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryListController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryListController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryNewController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryNewController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryPath' => 'applications/diffusion/data/DiffusionRepositoryPath.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryRef' => 'applications/diffusion/data/DiffusionRepositoryRef.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryRemarkupRule' => 'applications/diffusion/remarkup/DiffusionRepositoryRemarkupRule.php',
'DiffusionRepositorySymbolsController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositorySymbolsController.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryTag' => 'applications/diffusion/data/DiffusionRepositoryTag.php',
'DiffusionRepositoryTestAutomationController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionRepositoryTestAutomationController.php',
'DiffusionRequest' => 'applications/diffusion/request/DiffusionRequest.php',
'DiffusionResolveRefsConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionResolveRefsConduitAPIMethod.php',
Provide a standalone query for resolution of commit author/committer into Phabricator users Summary: Ref T4195. To implement the "Author" and "Committer" rules, I need to resolve author/committer strings into Phabricator users. The code to do this is currently buried in the daemons. Extract it into a standalone query. I also added `bin/repository lookup-users <commit>` to test this query, both to improve confidence I'm getting this right and to provide a diagnostic command for users, since there's occasionally some confusion over how author/committer strings resolve into valid users. Test Plan: I tested this using `bin/repository lookup-users` and `reparse.php --message` on Git, Mercurial and SVN commits. Here's the `lookup-users` output: >>> orbital ~/devtools/phabricator $ ./bin/repository lookup-users rINIS3 Examining commit rINIS3... Raw author string: epriestley Phabricator user: epriestley (Evan Priestley ) Raw committer string: null >>> orbital ~/devtools/phabricator $ ./bin/repository lookup-users rPOEMS165b6c54f487c8 Examining commit rPOEMS165b6c54f487... Raw author string: epriestley <git@epriestley.com> Phabricator user: epriestley (Evan Priestley ) Raw committer string: epriestley <git@epriestley.com> Phabricator user: epriestley (Evan Priestley ) >>> orbital ~/devtools/phabricator $ ./bin/repository lookup-users rINIH6d24c1aee7741e Examining commit rINIH6d24c1aee774... Raw author string: epriestley <hg@yghe.net> Phabricator user: epriestley (Evan Priestley ) Raw committer string: null >>> orbital ~/devtools/phabricator $ The `reparse.php` output was similar, and all VCSes resolved authors correctly. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1731, T4195 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7801
2013-12-19 20:05:17 +01:00
'DiffusionResolveUserQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/DiffusionResolveUserQuery.php',
'DiffusionSSHWorkflow' => 'applications/diffusion/ssh/DiffusionSSHWorkflow.php',
'DiffusionSearchQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionSearchQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionServeController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionServeController.php',
'DiffusionSetPasswordSettingsPanel' => 'applications/diffusion/panel/DiffusionSetPasswordSettingsPanel.php',
'DiffusionSetupException' => 'applications/diffusion/exception/DiffusionSetupException.php',
'DiffusionSubversionSSHWorkflow' => 'applications/diffusion/ssh/DiffusionSubversionSSHWorkflow.php',
'DiffusionSubversionServeSSHWorkflow' => 'applications/diffusion/ssh/DiffusionSubversionServeSSHWorkflow.php',
'DiffusionSubversionWireProtocol' => 'applications/diffusion/protocol/DiffusionSubversionWireProtocol.php',
'DiffusionSubversionWireProtocolTestCase' => 'applications/diffusion/protocol/__tests__/DiffusionSubversionWireProtocolTestCase.php',
'DiffusionSvnFileContentQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/filecontent/DiffusionSvnFileContentQuery.php',
'DiffusionSvnRawDiffQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/rawdiff/DiffusionSvnRawDiffQuery.php',
'DiffusionSvnRequest' => 'applications/diffusion/request/DiffusionSvnRequest.php',
'DiffusionSymbolController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionSymbolController.php',
'DiffusionSymbolDatasource' => 'applications/diffusion/typeahead/DiffusionSymbolDatasource.php',
'DiffusionSymbolQuery' => 'applications/diffusion/query/DiffusionSymbolQuery.php',
'DiffusionTagListController' => 'applications/diffusion/controller/DiffusionTagListController.php',
'DiffusionTagListView' => 'applications/diffusion/view/DiffusionTagListView.php',
'DiffusionTagsQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionTagsQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionURITestCase' => 'applications/diffusion/request/__tests__/DiffusionURITestCase.php',
'DiffusionUpdateCoverageConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/diffusion/conduit/DiffusionUpdateCoverageConduitAPIMethod.php',
'DiffusionView' => 'applications/diffusion/view/DiffusionView.php',
Port Diviner Core to Phabricator Summary: This implements most/all of the difficult parts of Diviner on top of Phabricator instead of as standalone components. See T988. In particular, here are the things I want to fix: **Performance** The Diviner parser works in two stages. The first stage breaks source files into "Atoms". The second stage renders atoms into a display format (e.g., HTML). Diviner currently has a good caching story on the first step of the pipeline, but zero caching in the second step. This means it's very slow, even for a fairly small project like Phabricator. We must re-render every piece of documentation every time, instead of only changed documentation. Most of this diff concerns itself with addressing this problem. There's a fairly large explanatory comment about it, but the trickiest part is that when an atom changes, other atoms (defined in other places) may also change -- for example, if `class B extends A`, editing A should dirty B, even if B is in an entirely different file. We perform analysis in two stages to propagate these changes: first detecting direct changes, then detecting indirect changes. This isn't completely implemented -- we need to propagate 'extends' through more levels -- but I believe it's structurally correct and good enough until we actually document classes. **Inheritance** Diviner currently has a very weak story on inheritance. I want to inherit a lot more metas/docs. If an interface documents a method, we should just pull that documentation in to every implementation by default (implementations can still override it if they want). It can be shown in grey or something, but it should be desirable and correct to omit documentation of a method implementation when you are implementing a parent. Similarly, I want to pull in inherited methods and @tasks and such. This diff sets up for that, by formalizing "extends" relationships between atoms. **Overspecialization** Diviner currently specializes atoms (FileAtom, FunctionAtom, ClassAtom, etc.). This is pretty much not useful, because Atomizers (which produce the atoms) need to be highly specialized, and Renderers/Publishers (which consume the atoms) also need to be highly specialized. Nothing interesting actually lives in the atom specializations, and we don't benefit from having them -- it just costs us generality in storage/caches for them. In the new code, I've used a single Atom class to represent any type of atom. **URIs** We have fairly hideous URIs right now, which are very cumbersome For in-app doc links, I want to provide nice URIs ("/h/notfications" or similar) which are stable redirects, and probably add remarkup for it: !{notifications} or similar. This diff isn't related to that since it's too premature. **Search** Once we have a database generation target, we can index the documentation. **Design** Chad has some nice mocks. Test Plan: Ran `bin/diviner generate`, `bin/diviner generate --clean`. Saw appropriate graph propagation after edits. This diff doesn't do anything very useful yet. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T988 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4340
2013-01-07 23:04:23 +01:00
'DivinerArticleAtomizer' => 'applications/diviner/atomizer/DivinerArticleAtomizer.php',
'DivinerAtom' => 'applications/diviner/atom/DivinerAtom.php',
'DivinerAtomCache' => 'applications/diviner/cache/DivinerAtomCache.php',
'DivinerAtomController' => 'applications/diviner/controller/DivinerAtomController.php',
'DivinerAtomListController' => 'applications/diviner/controller/DivinerAtomListController.php',
'DivinerAtomPHIDType' => 'applications/diviner/phid/DivinerAtomPHIDType.php',
'DivinerAtomQuery' => 'applications/diviner/query/DivinerAtomQuery.php',
Port Diviner Core to Phabricator Summary: This implements most/all of the difficult parts of Diviner on top of Phabricator instead of as standalone components. See T988. In particular, here are the things I want to fix: **Performance** The Diviner parser works in two stages. The first stage breaks source files into "Atoms". The second stage renders atoms into a display format (e.g., HTML). Diviner currently has a good caching story on the first step of the pipeline, but zero caching in the second step. This means it's very slow, even for a fairly small project like Phabricator. We must re-render every piece of documentation every time, instead of only changed documentation. Most of this diff concerns itself with addressing this problem. There's a fairly large explanatory comment about it, but the trickiest part is that when an atom changes, other atoms (defined in other places) may also change -- for example, if `class B extends A`, editing A should dirty B, even if B is in an entirely different file. We perform analysis in two stages to propagate these changes: first detecting direct changes, then detecting indirect changes. This isn't completely implemented -- we need to propagate 'extends' through more levels -- but I believe it's structurally correct and good enough until we actually document classes. **Inheritance** Diviner currently has a very weak story on inheritance. I want to inherit a lot more metas/docs. If an interface documents a method, we should just pull that documentation in to every implementation by default (implementations can still override it if they want). It can be shown in grey or something, but it should be desirable and correct to omit documentation of a method implementation when you are implementing a parent. Similarly, I want to pull in inherited methods and @tasks and such. This diff sets up for that, by formalizing "extends" relationships between atoms. **Overspecialization** Diviner currently specializes atoms (FileAtom, FunctionAtom, ClassAtom, etc.). This is pretty much not useful, because Atomizers (which produce the atoms) need to be highly specialized, and Renderers/Publishers (which consume the atoms) also need to be highly specialized. Nothing interesting actually lives in the atom specializations, and we don't benefit from having them -- it just costs us generality in storage/caches for them. In the new code, I've used a single Atom class to represent any type of atom. **URIs** We have fairly hideous URIs right now, which are very cumbersome For in-app doc links, I want to provide nice URIs ("/h/notfications" or similar) which are stable redirects, and probably add remarkup for it: !{notifications} or similar. This diff isn't related to that since it's too premature. **Search** Once we have a database generation target, we can index the documentation. **Design** Chad has some nice mocks. Test Plan: Ran `bin/diviner generate`, `bin/diviner generate --clean`. Saw appropriate graph propagation after edits. This diff doesn't do anything very useful yet. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T988 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4340
2013-01-07 23:04:23 +01:00
'DivinerAtomRef' => 'applications/diviner/atom/DivinerAtomRef.php',
'DivinerAtomSearchEngine' => 'applications/diviner/query/DivinerAtomSearchEngine.php',
'DivinerAtomSearchIndexer' => 'applications/diviner/search/DivinerAtomSearchIndexer.php',
Port Diviner Core to Phabricator Summary: This implements most/all of the difficult parts of Diviner on top of Phabricator instead of as standalone components. See T988. In particular, here are the things I want to fix: **Performance** The Diviner parser works in two stages. The first stage breaks source files into "Atoms". The second stage renders atoms into a display format (e.g., HTML). Diviner currently has a good caching story on the first step of the pipeline, but zero caching in the second step. This means it's very slow, even for a fairly small project like Phabricator. We must re-render every piece of documentation every time, instead of only changed documentation. Most of this diff concerns itself with addressing this problem. There's a fairly large explanatory comment about it, but the trickiest part is that when an atom changes, other atoms (defined in other places) may also change -- for example, if `class B extends A`, editing A should dirty B, even if B is in an entirely different file. We perform analysis in two stages to propagate these changes: first detecting direct changes, then detecting indirect changes. This isn't completely implemented -- we need to propagate 'extends' through more levels -- but I believe it's structurally correct and good enough until we actually document classes. **Inheritance** Diviner currently has a very weak story on inheritance. I want to inherit a lot more metas/docs. If an interface documents a method, we should just pull that documentation in to every implementation by default (implementations can still override it if they want). It can be shown in grey or something, but it should be desirable and correct to omit documentation of a method implementation when you are implementing a parent. Similarly, I want to pull in inherited methods and @tasks and such. This diff sets up for that, by formalizing "extends" relationships between atoms. **Overspecialization** Diviner currently specializes atoms (FileAtom, FunctionAtom, ClassAtom, etc.). This is pretty much not useful, because Atomizers (which produce the atoms) need to be highly specialized, and Renderers/Publishers (which consume the atoms) also need to be highly specialized. Nothing interesting actually lives in the atom specializations, and we don't benefit from having them -- it just costs us generality in storage/caches for them. In the new code, I've used a single Atom class to represent any type of atom. **URIs** We have fairly hideous URIs right now, which are very cumbersome For in-app doc links, I want to provide nice URIs ("/h/notfications" or similar) which are stable redirects, and probably add remarkup for it: !{notifications} or similar. This diff isn't related to that since it's too premature. **Search** Once we have a database generation target, we can index the documentation. **Design** Chad has some nice mocks. Test Plan: Ran `bin/diviner generate`, `bin/diviner generate --clean`. Saw appropriate graph propagation after edits. This diff doesn't do anything very useful yet. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T988 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4340
2013-01-07 23:04:23 +01:00
'DivinerAtomizeWorkflow' => 'applications/diviner/workflow/DivinerAtomizeWorkflow.php',
'DivinerAtomizer' => 'applications/diviner/atomizer/DivinerAtomizer.php',
'DivinerBookController' => 'applications/diviner/controller/DivinerBookController.php',
'DivinerBookDatasource' => 'applications/diviner/typeahead/DivinerBookDatasource.php',
'DivinerBookEditController' => 'applications/diviner/controller/DivinerBookEditController.php',
'DivinerBookItemView' => 'applications/diviner/view/DivinerBookItemView.php',
'DivinerBookPHIDType' => 'applications/diviner/phid/DivinerBookPHIDType.php',
'DivinerBookQuery' => 'applications/diviner/query/DivinerBookQuery.php',
'DivinerBookSearchIndexer' => 'applications/diviner/search/DivinerBookSearchIndexer.php',
'DivinerController' => 'applications/diviner/controller/DivinerController.php',
'DivinerDAO' => 'applications/diviner/storage/DivinerDAO.php',
'DivinerDefaultEditCapability' => 'applications/diviner/capability/DivinerDefaultEditCapability.php',
Move Diviner further toward usability Summary: - Complete the "project" -> "book" stuff. This is cleaner conceptually and keeps us from having yet another meaning for the word "project". - Normalize symbols during atomization. This simplifies publishing a great deal, and allows static documentation to link to dynamic documentation and vice versa, because the canonical names of symbols are agreed upon (we can tweak the actual algorithm). - Give articles a specifiable name distinct from the title, and default to something like "support" instead of "Get Help! Get Support!" so URIs end up more readable (not "Get_Help!_Get_Support!"). - Have the atomizers set book information on atoms. - Implement very basic publishers. Publishers are basically glue code between the atomization process and the rendering process -- the two we'll have initially are "static" (publish to files on disk) and "phabricator" (or similar -- publish into the database). - Handle duplicate symbol definitions in the atomize and publish pipelines. This fixes the issue where a project defines two functions named "idx()" and we currently tell them not to do that and break. Realistically, this is common in the real world and we should just roll our eyes and do the legwork to generate documentation as best we can. - Particularly, dirty all atoms with the same name as a dirty atom (e.g., if 'function f()' is updated, regnerate the documentation for all functions named f() in the book). - When publishing, we publish these at "function/f/@1", "function/f/@2". The base page will offer to disambiguate ("There are 8 functions named 'f' in this codebase, which one do you want?"). - Implement a very very basic renderer. This generates the actual HTML (or text, or XML, or whatever else) for the documentation, which the publisher dumps onto disk or into a database or whatever. - The atomize workflow actually needs to depend on books, at least sort of, so make it load config and use it properly. - Propagate multilevel dirties through the graph. If "C extends B" and "B extends A", we should regenerate C when A changes. Prior to this diff, we would regnerate B only. Test Plan: Generated some documentation. Named two articles "feedback", generated docs, saw "article/feedback/@1/" and "article/feedback/@2/" created. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, chad Reviewed By: chad CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T988 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4896
2013-02-18 00:39:36 +01:00
'DivinerDefaultRenderer' => 'applications/diviner/renderer/DivinerDefaultRenderer.php',
'DivinerDefaultViewCapability' => 'applications/diviner/capability/DivinerDefaultViewCapability.php',
'DivinerDiskCache' => 'applications/diviner/cache/DivinerDiskCache.php',
Port Diviner Core to Phabricator Summary: This implements most/all of the difficult parts of Diviner on top of Phabricator instead of as standalone components. See T988. In particular, here are the things I want to fix: **Performance** The Diviner parser works in two stages. The first stage breaks source files into "Atoms". The second stage renders atoms into a display format (e.g., HTML). Diviner currently has a good caching story on the first step of the pipeline, but zero caching in the second step. This means it's very slow, even for a fairly small project like Phabricator. We must re-render every piece of documentation every time, instead of only changed documentation. Most of this diff concerns itself with addressing this problem. There's a fairly large explanatory comment about it, but the trickiest part is that when an atom changes, other atoms (defined in other places) may also change -- for example, if `class B extends A`, editing A should dirty B, even if B is in an entirely different file. We perform analysis in two stages to propagate these changes: first detecting direct changes, then detecting indirect changes. This isn't completely implemented -- we need to propagate 'extends' through more levels -- but I believe it's structurally correct and good enough until we actually document classes. **Inheritance** Diviner currently has a very weak story on inheritance. I want to inherit a lot more metas/docs. If an interface documents a method, we should just pull that documentation in to every implementation by default (implementations can still override it if they want). It can be shown in grey or something, but it should be desirable and correct to omit documentation of a method implementation when you are implementing a parent. Similarly, I want to pull in inherited methods and @tasks and such. This diff sets up for that, by formalizing "extends" relationships between atoms. **Overspecialization** Diviner currently specializes atoms (FileAtom, FunctionAtom, ClassAtom, etc.). This is pretty much not useful, because Atomizers (which produce the atoms) need to be highly specialized, and Renderers/Publishers (which consume the atoms) also need to be highly specialized. Nothing interesting actually lives in the atom specializations, and we don't benefit from having them -- it just costs us generality in storage/caches for them. In the new code, I've used a single Atom class to represent any type of atom. **URIs** We have fairly hideous URIs right now, which are very cumbersome For in-app doc links, I want to provide nice URIs ("/h/notfications" or similar) which are stable redirects, and probably add remarkup for it: !{notifications} or similar. This diff isn't related to that since it's too premature. **Search** Once we have a database generation target, we can index the documentation. **Design** Chad has some nice mocks. Test Plan: Ran `bin/diviner generate`, `bin/diviner generate --clean`. Saw appropriate graph propagation after edits. This diff doesn't do anything very useful yet. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T988 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4340
2013-01-07 23:04:23 +01:00
'DivinerFileAtomizer' => 'applications/diviner/atomizer/DivinerFileAtomizer.php',
'DivinerFindController' => 'applications/diviner/controller/DivinerFindController.php',
Port Diviner Core to Phabricator Summary: This implements most/all of the difficult parts of Diviner on top of Phabricator instead of as standalone components. See T988. In particular, here are the things I want to fix: **Performance** The Diviner parser works in two stages. The first stage breaks source files into "Atoms". The second stage renders atoms into a display format (e.g., HTML). Diviner currently has a good caching story on the first step of the pipeline, but zero caching in the second step. This means it's very slow, even for a fairly small project like Phabricator. We must re-render every piece of documentation every time, instead of only changed documentation. Most of this diff concerns itself with addressing this problem. There's a fairly large explanatory comment about it, but the trickiest part is that when an atom changes, other atoms (defined in other places) may also change -- for example, if `class B extends A`, editing A should dirty B, even if B is in an entirely different file. We perform analysis in two stages to propagate these changes: first detecting direct changes, then detecting indirect changes. This isn't completely implemented -- we need to propagate 'extends' through more levels -- but I believe it's structurally correct and good enough until we actually document classes. **Inheritance** Diviner currently has a very weak story on inheritance. I want to inherit a lot more metas/docs. If an interface documents a method, we should just pull that documentation in to every implementation by default (implementations can still override it if they want). It can be shown in grey or something, but it should be desirable and correct to omit documentation of a method implementation when you are implementing a parent. Similarly, I want to pull in inherited methods and @tasks and such. This diff sets up for that, by formalizing "extends" relationships between atoms. **Overspecialization** Diviner currently specializes atoms (FileAtom, FunctionAtom, ClassAtom, etc.). This is pretty much not useful, because Atomizers (which produce the atoms) need to be highly specialized, and Renderers/Publishers (which consume the atoms) also need to be highly specialized. Nothing interesting actually lives in the atom specializations, and we don't benefit from having them -- it just costs us generality in storage/caches for them. In the new code, I've used a single Atom class to represent any type of atom. **URIs** We have fairly hideous URIs right now, which are very cumbersome For in-app doc links, I want to provide nice URIs ("/h/notfications" or similar) which are stable redirects, and probably add remarkup for it: !{notifications} or similar. This diff isn't related to that since it's too premature. **Search** Once we have a database generation target, we can index the documentation. **Design** Chad has some nice mocks. Test Plan: Ran `bin/diviner generate`, `bin/diviner generate --clean`. Saw appropriate graph propagation after edits. This diff doesn't do anything very useful yet. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T988 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4340
2013-01-07 23:04:23 +01:00
'DivinerGenerateWorkflow' => 'applications/diviner/workflow/DivinerGenerateWorkflow.php',
'DivinerLiveAtom' => 'applications/diviner/storage/DivinerLiveAtom.php',
'DivinerLiveBook' => 'applications/diviner/storage/DivinerLiveBook.php',
'DivinerLiveBookEditor' => 'applications/diviner/editor/DivinerLiveBookEditor.php',
'DivinerLiveBookTransaction' => 'applications/diviner/storage/DivinerLiveBookTransaction.php',
'DivinerLiveBookTransactionQuery' => 'applications/diviner/query/DivinerLiveBookTransactionQuery.php',
'DivinerLivePublisher' => 'applications/diviner/publisher/DivinerLivePublisher.php',
'DivinerLiveSymbol' => 'applications/diviner/storage/DivinerLiveSymbol.php',
'DivinerMainController' => 'applications/diviner/controller/DivinerMainController.php',
'DivinerPHPAtomizer' => 'applications/diviner/atomizer/DivinerPHPAtomizer.php',
'DivinerParameterTableView' => 'applications/diviner/view/DivinerParameterTableView.php',
'DivinerPublishCache' => 'applications/diviner/cache/DivinerPublishCache.php',
Move Diviner further toward usability Summary: - Complete the "project" -> "book" stuff. This is cleaner conceptually and keeps us from having yet another meaning for the word "project". - Normalize symbols during atomization. This simplifies publishing a great deal, and allows static documentation to link to dynamic documentation and vice versa, because the canonical names of symbols are agreed upon (we can tweak the actual algorithm). - Give articles a specifiable name distinct from the title, and default to something like "support" instead of "Get Help! Get Support!" so URIs end up more readable (not "Get_Help!_Get_Support!"). - Have the atomizers set book information on atoms. - Implement very basic publishers. Publishers are basically glue code between the atomization process and the rendering process -- the two we'll have initially are "static" (publish to files on disk) and "phabricator" (or similar -- publish into the database). - Handle duplicate symbol definitions in the atomize and publish pipelines. This fixes the issue where a project defines two functions named "idx()" and we currently tell them not to do that and break. Realistically, this is common in the real world and we should just roll our eyes and do the legwork to generate documentation as best we can. - Particularly, dirty all atoms with the same name as a dirty atom (e.g., if 'function f()' is updated, regnerate the documentation for all functions named f() in the book). - When publishing, we publish these at "function/f/@1", "function/f/@2". The base page will offer to disambiguate ("There are 8 functions named 'f' in this codebase, which one do you want?"). - Implement a very very basic renderer. This generates the actual HTML (or text, or XML, or whatever else) for the documentation, which the publisher dumps onto disk or into a database or whatever. - The atomize workflow actually needs to depend on books, at least sort of, so make it load config and use it properly. - Propagate multilevel dirties through the graph. If "C extends B" and "B extends A", we should regenerate C when A changes. Prior to this diff, we would regnerate B only. Test Plan: Generated some documentation. Named two articles "feedback", generated docs, saw "article/feedback/@1/" and "article/feedback/@2/" created. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, chad Reviewed By: chad CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T988 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4896
2013-02-18 00:39:36 +01:00
'DivinerPublisher' => 'applications/diviner/publisher/DivinerPublisher.php',
'DivinerRenderer' => 'applications/diviner/renderer/DivinerRenderer.php',
'DivinerReturnTableView' => 'applications/diviner/view/DivinerReturnTableView.php',
'DivinerSchemaSpec' => 'applications/diviner/storage/DivinerSchemaSpec.php',
'DivinerSectionView' => 'applications/diviner/view/DivinerSectionView.php',
Move Diviner further toward usability Summary: - Complete the "project" -> "book" stuff. This is cleaner conceptually and keeps us from having yet another meaning for the word "project". - Normalize symbols during atomization. This simplifies publishing a great deal, and allows static documentation to link to dynamic documentation and vice versa, because the canonical names of symbols are agreed upon (we can tweak the actual algorithm). - Give articles a specifiable name distinct from the title, and default to something like "support" instead of "Get Help! Get Support!" so URIs end up more readable (not "Get_Help!_Get_Support!"). - Have the atomizers set book information on atoms. - Implement very basic publishers. Publishers are basically glue code between the atomization process and the rendering process -- the two we'll have initially are "static" (publish to files on disk) and "phabricator" (or similar -- publish into the database). - Handle duplicate symbol definitions in the atomize and publish pipelines. This fixes the issue where a project defines two functions named "idx()" and we currently tell them not to do that and break. Realistically, this is common in the real world and we should just roll our eyes and do the legwork to generate documentation as best we can. - Particularly, dirty all atoms with the same name as a dirty atom (e.g., if 'function f()' is updated, regnerate the documentation for all functions named f() in the book). - When publishing, we publish these at "function/f/@1", "function/f/@2". The base page will offer to disambiguate ("There are 8 functions named 'f' in this codebase, which one do you want?"). - Implement a very very basic renderer. This generates the actual HTML (or text, or XML, or whatever else) for the documentation, which the publisher dumps onto disk or into a database or whatever. - The atomize workflow actually needs to depend on books, at least sort of, so make it load config and use it properly. - Propagate multilevel dirties through the graph. If "C extends B" and "B extends A", we should regenerate C when A changes. Prior to this diff, we would regnerate B only. Test Plan: Generated some documentation. Named two articles "feedback", generated docs, saw "article/feedback/@1/" and "article/feedback/@2/" created. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, chad Reviewed By: chad CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T988 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4896
2013-02-18 00:39:36 +01:00
'DivinerStaticPublisher' => 'applications/diviner/publisher/DivinerStaticPublisher.php',
'DivinerSymbolRemarkupRule' => 'applications/diviner/markup/DivinerSymbolRemarkupRule.php',
Port Diviner Core to Phabricator Summary: This implements most/all of the difficult parts of Diviner on top of Phabricator instead of as standalone components. See T988. In particular, here are the things I want to fix: **Performance** The Diviner parser works in two stages. The first stage breaks source files into "Atoms". The second stage renders atoms into a display format (e.g., HTML). Diviner currently has a good caching story on the first step of the pipeline, but zero caching in the second step. This means it's very slow, even for a fairly small project like Phabricator. We must re-render every piece of documentation every time, instead of only changed documentation. Most of this diff concerns itself with addressing this problem. There's a fairly large explanatory comment about it, but the trickiest part is that when an atom changes, other atoms (defined in other places) may also change -- for example, if `class B extends A`, editing A should dirty B, even if B is in an entirely different file. We perform analysis in two stages to propagate these changes: first detecting direct changes, then detecting indirect changes. This isn't completely implemented -- we need to propagate 'extends' through more levels -- but I believe it's structurally correct and good enough until we actually document classes. **Inheritance** Diviner currently has a very weak story on inheritance. I want to inherit a lot more metas/docs. If an interface documents a method, we should just pull that documentation in to every implementation by default (implementations can still override it if they want). It can be shown in grey or something, but it should be desirable and correct to omit documentation of a method implementation when you are implementing a parent. Similarly, I want to pull in inherited methods and @tasks and such. This diff sets up for that, by formalizing "extends" relationships between atoms. **Overspecialization** Diviner currently specializes atoms (FileAtom, FunctionAtom, ClassAtom, etc.). This is pretty much not useful, because Atomizers (which produce the atoms) need to be highly specialized, and Renderers/Publishers (which consume the atoms) also need to be highly specialized. Nothing interesting actually lives in the atom specializations, and we don't benefit from having them -- it just costs us generality in storage/caches for them. In the new code, I've used a single Atom class to represent any type of atom. **URIs** We have fairly hideous URIs right now, which are very cumbersome For in-app doc links, I want to provide nice URIs ("/h/notfications" or similar) which are stable redirects, and probably add remarkup for it: !{notifications} or similar. This diff isn't related to that since it's too premature. **Search** Once we have a database generation target, we can index the documentation. **Design** Chad has some nice mocks. Test Plan: Ran `bin/diviner generate`, `bin/diviner generate --clean`. Saw appropriate graph propagation after edits. This diff doesn't do anything very useful yet. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T988 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4340
2013-01-07 23:04:23 +01:00
'DivinerWorkflow' => 'applications/diviner/workflow/DivinerWorkflow.php',
'DoorkeeperAsanaFeedWorker' => 'applications/doorkeeper/worker/DoorkeeperAsanaFeedWorker.php',
'DoorkeeperAsanaRemarkupRule' => 'applications/doorkeeper/remarkup/DoorkeeperAsanaRemarkupRule.php',
'DoorkeeperBridge' => 'applications/doorkeeper/bridge/DoorkeeperBridge.php',
'DoorkeeperBridgeAsana' => 'applications/doorkeeper/bridge/DoorkeeperBridgeAsana.php',
'DoorkeeperBridgeJIRA' => 'applications/doorkeeper/bridge/DoorkeeperBridgeJIRA.php',
'DoorkeeperBridgeJIRATestCase' => 'applications/doorkeeper/bridge/__tests__/DoorkeeperBridgeJIRATestCase.php',
'DoorkeeperDAO' => 'applications/doorkeeper/storage/DoorkeeperDAO.php',
'DoorkeeperExternalObject' => 'applications/doorkeeper/storage/DoorkeeperExternalObject.php',
'DoorkeeperExternalObjectQuery' => 'applications/doorkeeper/query/DoorkeeperExternalObjectQuery.php',
'DoorkeeperFeedStoryPublisher' => 'applications/doorkeeper/engine/DoorkeeperFeedStoryPublisher.php',
'DoorkeeperFeedWorker' => 'applications/doorkeeper/worker/DoorkeeperFeedWorker.php',
'DoorkeeperImportEngine' => 'applications/doorkeeper/engine/DoorkeeperImportEngine.php',
'DoorkeeperJIRAFeedWorker' => 'applications/doorkeeper/worker/DoorkeeperJIRAFeedWorker.php',
'DoorkeeperJIRARemarkupRule' => 'applications/doorkeeper/remarkup/DoorkeeperJIRARemarkupRule.php',
'DoorkeeperMissingLinkException' => 'applications/doorkeeper/exception/DoorkeeperMissingLinkException.php',
'DoorkeeperObjectRef' => 'applications/doorkeeper/engine/DoorkeeperObjectRef.php',
'DoorkeeperRemarkupRule' => 'applications/doorkeeper/remarkup/DoorkeeperRemarkupRule.php',
'DoorkeeperSchemaSpec' => 'applications/doorkeeper/storage/DoorkeeperSchemaSpec.php',
'DoorkeeperTagView' => 'applications/doorkeeper/view/DoorkeeperTagView.php',
'DoorkeeperTagsController' => 'applications/doorkeeper/controller/DoorkeeperTagsController.php',
Implement a rough AlmanacService blueprint in Drydock Summary: Ref T9253. Broadly, this realigns Allocator behavior to be more consistent and straightforward and amenable to intended future changes. This attempts to make language more consistent: resources are "allocated" and leases are "acquired". This prepares for (but does not implement) optimistic "slot locking", as discussed in D10304. Although I suspect some blueprints will need to perform other locking eventually, this does feel like a good fit for most of the locking blueprints need to do. In particular, I've made the blueprint operations on `$resource` and `$lease` objects more purposeful: they need to invoke an activator on the appropriate object to be implemented correctly. Before they invoke this activator method, they configure the object. In a future diff, this configuration will include specifying slot locks that the lease or resource must acquire. So the API will be something like: $lease ->setActivateWhenAcquired(true) ->needSlotLock('x') ->needSlotLock('y') ->acquireOnResource($resource); In the common case where slot locks are a good fit, I think this should make correct blueprint implementation very straightforward. This prepares for (but does not implement) resources and leases which need significant setup steps. I've basically carved out two modes: - The "activate immediately" mode, as here, immediately opens the resource or activates the lease. This is appropriate if little or no setup is required. I expect many leases to operate in this mode, although I expect many resources will operate in the other mode. - The "allocate now, activate later" mode, which is not fully implemented yet. This will queue setup workers when the allocator exits. Overall, this will work very similarly to Harbormaster. - This new structure makes it acceptable for blueprints to sleep as long as they want during resource allocation and lease acquisition, so long as they are not waiting on anything which needs to be completed by the queue. Putting a `sleep(15 * 60)` in your EC2Blueprint to wait for EC2 to bring a machine up will perform worse than using delayed activation, but won't deadlock the queue or block any locks. Overall, this flow is more similar to Harbormaster's flow. Having consistency between Harbormaster's model and Drydock's model is good, and I think Harbormaster's model is also simply much better than Drydock's (what exists today in Drydock was implemented a long time ago, and we had more support and infrastructure by the time Harbormaster was implemented, as well as a more clearly defined problem). The particular strength of Harbormaster is that objects always (or almost always, at least) have a single, clearly defined writer. Ensuring objects have only one writer prevents races and makes reasoning about everything easier. Drydock does not currently have a clearly defined single writer, but this moves us in that direction. We'll probably need more primitives eventually to flesh this out, like Harbormaster's command queue for messaging objects which you can't write to. This blueprint was originally implemented in D13843. This makes a few changes to the blueprint itself: - A bunch of code from that (e.g., interfaces) doesn't exist yet. - I let the blueprint have multiple services. This simplifies the code a little and seems like it costs us nothing. This also removes `bin/drydock create-resource`, which no longer makes sense to expose. It won't get locking, leasing, etc., correct, and can not be made correct. NOTE: This technically works but doesn't do anything useful yet. Test Plan: Used `bin/drydock lease --type host` to acquire leases against these blueprints. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: hach-que, chad Subscribers: Mnkras Maniphest Tasks: T9253 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14117
2015-09-21 13:43:53 +02:00
'DrydockAlmanacServiceHostBlueprintImplementation' => 'applications/drydock/blueprint/DrydockAlmanacServiceHostBlueprintImplementation.php',
'DrydockApacheWebrootInterface' => 'applications/drydock/interface/webroot/DrydockApacheWebrootInterface.php',
Rough cut of "Blueprint Authorizations" Summary: Ref T9519. This is like 80% of the way there and doesn't fully work yet, but roughly shows the shape of things to come. Here's how it works: First, there's a new custom field type for blueprints which works like a normal typeahead but has some extra logic. It's implemented this way to make it easy to add to Blueprints in Drydock and Build Plans in Harbormaster. Here, I've added a "Use Blueprints" field to the "WorkingCopy" blueprint, so you can control which hosts the working copies are permitted to allocate on: {F869865} This control has a bit of custom rendering logic. Instead of rendering a normal list of PHIDs, it renders an annotated list with icons: {F869866} These icons show whether the blueprint on the other size of the authorization has approved this object. Once you have a green checkmark, you're good to go. On the blueprint side, things look like this: {F869867} This table shows all the objects which have asked for access to this blueprint. In this case it's showing that one object is approved to use the blueprint since I already approved it, but by default new requests come in here as "Authorization Requested" and someone has to go approve them. You approve them from within the authorization detail screen: {F869868} You can use the "Approve" or "Decline" buttons to allow or prevent use of the blueprint. This doesn't actually do anything yet -- objects don't need to be authorized in order to use blueprints quite yet. That will come in the next diff, I just wanted to get the UI in reasonable shape first. The authorization also has a second piece of state, which is whether the request from the object is active or inactive. We use this to keep track of the authorization if the blueprint is (maybe temporarily) deleted. For example, you might have a Build Plan that uses Blueprints A and B. For a couple days, you only want to use A, so you remove B from the "Use Blueprints: ..." field. Later, you can add B back and it will connect to its old authorization again, so you don't need to go re-approve things (and if you're declined, you stay declined instead of being able to request authorization over and over again). This should make working with authorizations a little easier and less labor intensive. Stuff not in this diff: - Actually preventing any allocations (next diff). - Probably should have transactions for approve/decline, at least, at some point, so there's a log of who did approvals and when. - Maybe should have a more clear/loud error state when no blueprints are approved? - Should probably restrict the typeahead to specific blueprint types. Test Plan: - Added the field. - Typed some stuff into it. - Saw the UI update properly. - Approved an authorization. - Declined an authorization. - Saw active authorizations on a blueprint page. - Didn't see any inactive authroizations there. - Clicked "View All Authorizations", saw all authorizations. Reviewers: chad, hach-que Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9519 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14251
2015-10-10 16:15:25 +02:00
'DrydockAuthorization' => 'applications/drydock/storage/DrydockAuthorization.php',
'DrydockAuthorizationAuthorizeController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockAuthorizationAuthorizeController.php',
'DrydockAuthorizationListController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockAuthorizationListController.php',
'DrydockAuthorizationListView' => 'applications/drydock/view/DrydockAuthorizationListView.php',
'DrydockAuthorizationPHIDType' => 'applications/drydock/phid/DrydockAuthorizationPHIDType.php',
'DrydockAuthorizationQuery' => 'applications/drydock/query/DrydockAuthorizationQuery.php',
'DrydockAuthorizationSearchEngine' => 'applications/drydock/query/DrydockAuthorizationSearchEngine.php',
'DrydockAuthorizationViewController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockAuthorizationViewController.php',
'DrydockBlueprint' => 'applications/drydock/storage/DrydockBlueprint.php',
'DrydockBlueprintController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockBlueprintController.php',
'DrydockBlueprintCoreCustomField' => 'applications/drydock/customfield/DrydockBlueprintCoreCustomField.php',
'DrydockBlueprintCreateController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockBlueprintCreateController.php',
'DrydockBlueprintCustomField' => 'applications/drydock/customfield/DrydockBlueprintCustomField.php',
'DrydockBlueprintDatasource' => 'applications/drydock/typeahead/DrydockBlueprintDatasource.php',
'DrydockBlueprintDisableController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockBlueprintDisableController.php',
'DrydockBlueprintEditController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockBlueprintEditController.php',
'DrydockBlueprintEditor' => 'applications/drydock/editor/DrydockBlueprintEditor.php',
'DrydockBlueprintImplementation' => 'applications/drydock/blueprint/DrydockBlueprintImplementation.php',
'DrydockBlueprintImplementationTestCase' => 'applications/drydock/blueprint/__tests__/DrydockBlueprintImplementationTestCase.php',
'DrydockBlueprintListController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockBlueprintListController.php',
'DrydockBlueprintPHIDType' => 'applications/drydock/phid/DrydockBlueprintPHIDType.php',
'DrydockBlueprintQuery' => 'applications/drydock/query/DrydockBlueprintQuery.php',
'DrydockBlueprintSearchEngine' => 'applications/drydock/query/DrydockBlueprintSearchEngine.php',
'DrydockBlueprintTransaction' => 'applications/drydock/storage/DrydockBlueprintTransaction.php',
'DrydockBlueprintTransactionQuery' => 'applications/drydock/query/DrydockBlueprintTransactionQuery.php',
'DrydockBlueprintViewController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockBlueprintViewController.php',
Add a command queue to Drydock to manage lease/resource release Summary: Ref T9252. Broadly, Drydock currently races on releasing objects from the "active" state. To reproduce this: - Scatter some sleep()s pretty much anywhere in the release code. - Release several times from web UI or CLI in quick succession. Resources or leases will execute some release code twice or otherwise do inconsistent things. (I didn't chase down a detailed reproduction scenario for this since inspection of the code makes it clear that there are no meaningful locks or mechanisms preventing this.) Instead, add a Harbormaster-style command queue to resources and leases. When something wants to do a release, it adds a command to the queue and schedules a worker. The workers acquire a lock, then try to consume commands from the queue. This guarantees that only one process is responsible for writes to active resource/leases. This is the last major step to giving resources and leases a single writer during all states: - Resource, Unsaved: AllocatorWorker - Resource, Pending: ResourceWorker (Possible rename to "Allocated?") - Resource, Open: This diff, ResourceUpdateWorker. (Likely rename to "Active"). - Resource, Closed/Broken: Future destruction worker. (Likely rename to "Released" / "Broken"; maybe remove "Broken"). - Resource, Destroyed: No writes. - Lease, Unsaved: Whatever wants the lease. - Lease, Pending: AllocatorWorker - Lease, Acquired: LeaseWorker - Lease, Active: This diff, LeaseUpdateWorker. - Lease, Released/Broken: Future destruction worker (Maybe remove "Broken"?) - Lease, Expired: No writes. (Likely rename to "Destroyed"). In most phases, we can already guarantee that there is a single writer without doing any extra work. This is more complicated in the "Active" case because the release buttons on the web UI, the release tools on the CLI, the lease requestor itself, the garbage collector, and any other release process cleaning up related objects may try to effect a release. All of these could race one another (and, in many cases, race other processes from other phases because all of these get to act immediately) as this code is currently written. Using a queue here lets us make sure there's only a single writer in this phase. One thing which is notable is that whatever acquires a lease **can not write to it**! It is never the writer once it queues the lease for activation. It can not write to any resources, either. And, likewise, Blueprints can not write to resources while acquiring or releasing leases. We may need to provide a mechinism so that blueprints and/or resource/lease holders get to attach some storage to resources/leases for bookkeeping. For example, a blueprint might need to keep some kind of cache on a resource to help it manage state. But I think we can cross that bridge when we come to it, and nothing else would need to write to this storage so it's technically straightforward to introduce such a mechanism if we need one. Test Plan: - Viewed buttons in web UI, checked enabled/disabled states. - Clicked the buttons. - Saw commands show up in the command queue. - Saw some daemon stuff get scheduled. - Ran CLI tools, saw commands get consumed and resources/leases release. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9252 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14143
2015-09-23 16:42:08 +02:00
'DrydockCommand' => 'applications/drydock/storage/DrydockCommand.php',
'DrydockCommandInterface' => 'applications/drydock/interface/command/DrydockCommandInterface.php',
Add a command queue to Drydock to manage lease/resource release Summary: Ref T9252. Broadly, Drydock currently races on releasing objects from the "active" state. To reproduce this: - Scatter some sleep()s pretty much anywhere in the release code. - Release several times from web UI or CLI in quick succession. Resources or leases will execute some release code twice or otherwise do inconsistent things. (I didn't chase down a detailed reproduction scenario for this since inspection of the code makes it clear that there are no meaningful locks or mechanisms preventing this.) Instead, add a Harbormaster-style command queue to resources and leases. When something wants to do a release, it adds a command to the queue and schedules a worker. The workers acquire a lock, then try to consume commands from the queue. This guarantees that only one process is responsible for writes to active resource/leases. This is the last major step to giving resources and leases a single writer during all states: - Resource, Unsaved: AllocatorWorker - Resource, Pending: ResourceWorker (Possible rename to "Allocated?") - Resource, Open: This diff, ResourceUpdateWorker. (Likely rename to "Active"). - Resource, Closed/Broken: Future destruction worker. (Likely rename to "Released" / "Broken"; maybe remove "Broken"). - Resource, Destroyed: No writes. - Lease, Unsaved: Whatever wants the lease. - Lease, Pending: AllocatorWorker - Lease, Acquired: LeaseWorker - Lease, Active: This diff, LeaseUpdateWorker. - Lease, Released/Broken: Future destruction worker (Maybe remove "Broken"?) - Lease, Expired: No writes. (Likely rename to "Destroyed"). In most phases, we can already guarantee that there is a single writer without doing any extra work. This is more complicated in the "Active" case because the release buttons on the web UI, the release tools on the CLI, the lease requestor itself, the garbage collector, and any other release process cleaning up related objects may try to effect a release. All of these could race one another (and, in many cases, race other processes from other phases because all of these get to act immediately) as this code is currently written. Using a queue here lets us make sure there's only a single writer in this phase. One thing which is notable is that whatever acquires a lease **can not write to it**! It is never the writer once it queues the lease for activation. It can not write to any resources, either. And, likewise, Blueprints can not write to resources while acquiring or releasing leases. We may need to provide a mechinism so that blueprints and/or resource/lease holders get to attach some storage to resources/leases for bookkeeping. For example, a blueprint might need to keep some kind of cache on a resource to help it manage state. But I think we can cross that bridge when we come to it, and nothing else would need to write to this storage so it's technically straightforward to introduce such a mechanism if we need one. Test Plan: - Viewed buttons in web UI, checked enabled/disabled states. - Clicked the buttons. - Saw commands show up in the command queue. - Saw some daemon stuff get scheduled. - Ran CLI tools, saw commands get consumed and resources/leases release. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9252 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14143
2015-09-23 16:42:08 +02:00
'DrydockCommandQuery' => 'applications/drydock/query/DrydockCommandQuery.php',
'DrydockConsoleController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockConsoleController.php',
'DrydockConstants' => 'applications/drydock/constants/DrydockConstants.php',
'DrydockController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockController.php',
'DrydockCreateBlueprintsCapability' => 'applications/drydock/capability/DrydockCreateBlueprintsCapability.php',
'DrydockDAO' => 'applications/drydock/storage/DrydockDAO.php',
'DrydockDefaultEditCapability' => 'applications/drydock/capability/DrydockDefaultEditCapability.php',
'DrydockDefaultViewCapability' => 'applications/drydock/capability/DrydockDefaultViewCapability.php',
'DrydockFilesystemInterface' => 'applications/drydock/interface/filesystem/DrydockFilesystemInterface.php',
'DrydockInterface' => 'applications/drydock/interface/DrydockInterface.php',
'DrydockLandRepositoryOperation' => 'applications/drydock/operation/DrydockLandRepositoryOperation.php',
'DrydockLease' => 'applications/drydock/storage/DrydockLease.php',
'DrydockLeaseAcquiredLogType' => 'applications/drydock/logtype/DrydockLeaseAcquiredLogType.php',
'DrydockLeaseActivatedLogType' => 'applications/drydock/logtype/DrydockLeaseActivatedLogType.php',
'DrydockLeaseActivationFailureLogType' => 'applications/drydock/logtype/DrydockLeaseActivationFailureLogType.php',
'DrydockLeaseActivationYieldLogType' => 'applications/drydock/logtype/DrydockLeaseActivationYieldLogType.php',
'DrydockLeaseController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockLeaseController.php',
'DrydockLeaseDatasource' => 'applications/drydock/typeahead/DrydockLeaseDatasource.php',
'DrydockLeaseDestroyedLogType' => 'applications/drydock/logtype/DrydockLeaseDestroyedLogType.php',
'DrydockLeaseListController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockLeaseListController.php',
'DrydockLeaseListView' => 'applications/drydock/view/DrydockLeaseListView.php',
'DrydockLeaseNoAuthorizationsLogType' => 'applications/drydock/logtype/DrydockLeaseNoAuthorizationsLogType.php',
'DrydockLeaseNoBlueprintsLogType' => 'applications/drydock/logtype/DrydockLeaseNoBlueprintsLogType.php',
'DrydockLeasePHIDType' => 'applications/drydock/phid/DrydockLeasePHIDType.php',
'DrydockLeaseQuery' => 'applications/drydock/query/DrydockLeaseQuery.php',
'DrydockLeaseQueuedLogType' => 'applications/drydock/logtype/DrydockLeaseQueuedLogType.php',
'DrydockLeaseReleaseController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockLeaseReleaseController.php',
'DrydockLeaseReleasedLogType' => 'applications/drydock/logtype/DrydockLeaseReleasedLogType.php',
'DrydockLeaseSearchEngine' => 'applications/drydock/query/DrydockLeaseSearchEngine.php',
'DrydockLeaseStatus' => 'applications/drydock/constants/DrydockLeaseStatus.php',
Add a command queue to Drydock to manage lease/resource release Summary: Ref T9252. Broadly, Drydock currently races on releasing objects from the "active" state. To reproduce this: - Scatter some sleep()s pretty much anywhere in the release code. - Release several times from web UI or CLI in quick succession. Resources or leases will execute some release code twice or otherwise do inconsistent things. (I didn't chase down a detailed reproduction scenario for this since inspection of the code makes it clear that there are no meaningful locks or mechanisms preventing this.) Instead, add a Harbormaster-style command queue to resources and leases. When something wants to do a release, it adds a command to the queue and schedules a worker. The workers acquire a lock, then try to consume commands from the queue. This guarantees that only one process is responsible for writes to active resource/leases. This is the last major step to giving resources and leases a single writer during all states: - Resource, Unsaved: AllocatorWorker - Resource, Pending: ResourceWorker (Possible rename to "Allocated?") - Resource, Open: This diff, ResourceUpdateWorker. (Likely rename to "Active"). - Resource, Closed/Broken: Future destruction worker. (Likely rename to "Released" / "Broken"; maybe remove "Broken"). - Resource, Destroyed: No writes. - Lease, Unsaved: Whatever wants the lease. - Lease, Pending: AllocatorWorker - Lease, Acquired: LeaseWorker - Lease, Active: This diff, LeaseUpdateWorker. - Lease, Released/Broken: Future destruction worker (Maybe remove "Broken"?) - Lease, Expired: No writes. (Likely rename to "Destroyed"). In most phases, we can already guarantee that there is a single writer without doing any extra work. This is more complicated in the "Active" case because the release buttons on the web UI, the release tools on the CLI, the lease requestor itself, the garbage collector, and any other release process cleaning up related objects may try to effect a release. All of these could race one another (and, in many cases, race other processes from other phases because all of these get to act immediately) as this code is currently written. Using a queue here lets us make sure there's only a single writer in this phase. One thing which is notable is that whatever acquires a lease **can not write to it**! It is never the writer once it queues the lease for activation. It can not write to any resources, either. And, likewise, Blueprints can not write to resources while acquiring or releasing leases. We may need to provide a mechinism so that blueprints and/or resource/lease holders get to attach some storage to resources/leases for bookkeeping. For example, a blueprint might need to keep some kind of cache on a resource to help it manage state. But I think we can cross that bridge when we come to it, and nothing else would need to write to this storage so it's technically straightforward to introduce such a mechanism if we need one. Test Plan: - Viewed buttons in web UI, checked enabled/disabled states. - Clicked the buttons. - Saw commands show up in the command queue. - Saw some daemon stuff get scheduled. - Ran CLI tools, saw commands get consumed and resources/leases release. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9252 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14143
2015-09-23 16:42:08 +02:00
'DrydockLeaseUpdateWorker' => 'applications/drydock/worker/DrydockLeaseUpdateWorker.php',
'DrydockLeaseViewController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockLeaseViewController.php',
'DrydockLeaseWaitingForResourcesLogType' => 'applications/drydock/logtype/DrydockLeaseWaitingForResourcesLogType.php',
'DrydockLog' => 'applications/drydock/storage/DrydockLog.php',
'DrydockLogController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockLogController.php',
'DrydockLogGarbageCollector' => 'applications/drydock/garbagecollector/DrydockLogGarbageCollector.php',
'DrydockLogListController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockLogListController.php',
'DrydockLogListView' => 'applications/drydock/view/DrydockLogListView.php',
'DrydockLogQuery' => 'applications/drydock/query/DrydockLogQuery.php',
'DrydockLogSearchEngine' => 'applications/drydock/query/DrydockLogSearchEngine.php',
'DrydockLogType' => 'applications/drydock/logtype/DrydockLogType.php',
'DrydockManagementCommandWorkflow' => 'applications/drydock/management/DrydockManagementCommandWorkflow.php',
'DrydockManagementLeaseWorkflow' => 'applications/drydock/management/DrydockManagementLeaseWorkflow.php',
Add a command queue to Drydock to manage lease/resource release Summary: Ref T9252. Broadly, Drydock currently races on releasing objects from the "active" state. To reproduce this: - Scatter some sleep()s pretty much anywhere in the release code. - Release several times from web UI or CLI in quick succession. Resources or leases will execute some release code twice or otherwise do inconsistent things. (I didn't chase down a detailed reproduction scenario for this since inspection of the code makes it clear that there are no meaningful locks or mechanisms preventing this.) Instead, add a Harbormaster-style command queue to resources and leases. When something wants to do a release, it adds a command to the queue and schedules a worker. The workers acquire a lock, then try to consume commands from the queue. This guarantees that only one process is responsible for writes to active resource/leases. This is the last major step to giving resources and leases a single writer during all states: - Resource, Unsaved: AllocatorWorker - Resource, Pending: ResourceWorker (Possible rename to "Allocated?") - Resource, Open: This diff, ResourceUpdateWorker. (Likely rename to "Active"). - Resource, Closed/Broken: Future destruction worker. (Likely rename to "Released" / "Broken"; maybe remove "Broken"). - Resource, Destroyed: No writes. - Lease, Unsaved: Whatever wants the lease. - Lease, Pending: AllocatorWorker - Lease, Acquired: LeaseWorker - Lease, Active: This diff, LeaseUpdateWorker. - Lease, Released/Broken: Future destruction worker (Maybe remove "Broken"?) - Lease, Expired: No writes. (Likely rename to "Destroyed"). In most phases, we can already guarantee that there is a single writer without doing any extra work. This is more complicated in the "Active" case because the release buttons on the web UI, the release tools on the CLI, the lease requestor itself, the garbage collector, and any other release process cleaning up related objects may try to effect a release. All of these could race one another (and, in many cases, race other processes from other phases because all of these get to act immediately) as this code is currently written. Using a queue here lets us make sure there's only a single writer in this phase. One thing which is notable is that whatever acquires a lease **can not write to it**! It is never the writer once it queues the lease for activation. It can not write to any resources, either. And, likewise, Blueprints can not write to resources while acquiring or releasing leases. We may need to provide a mechinism so that blueprints and/or resource/lease holders get to attach some storage to resources/leases for bookkeeping. For example, a blueprint might need to keep some kind of cache on a resource to help it manage state. But I think we can cross that bridge when we come to it, and nothing else would need to write to this storage so it's technically straightforward to introduce such a mechanism if we need one. Test Plan: - Viewed buttons in web UI, checked enabled/disabled states. - Clicked the buttons. - Saw commands show up in the command queue. - Saw some daemon stuff get scheduled. - Ran CLI tools, saw commands get consumed and resources/leases release. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9252 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14143
2015-09-23 16:42:08 +02:00
'DrydockManagementReleaseLeaseWorkflow' => 'applications/drydock/management/DrydockManagementReleaseLeaseWorkflow.php',
'DrydockManagementReleaseResourceWorkflow' => 'applications/drydock/management/DrydockManagementReleaseResourceWorkflow.php',
'DrydockManagementUpdateLeaseWorkflow' => 'applications/drydock/management/DrydockManagementUpdateLeaseWorkflow.php',
'DrydockManagementUpdateResourceWorkflow' => 'applications/drydock/management/DrydockManagementUpdateResourceWorkflow.php',
'DrydockManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/drydock/management/DrydockManagementWorkflow.php',
'DrydockObjectAuthorizationView' => 'applications/drydock/view/DrydockObjectAuthorizationView.php',
'DrydockQuery' => 'applications/drydock/query/DrydockQuery.php',
'DrydockRepositoryOperation' => 'applications/drydock/storage/DrydockRepositoryOperation.php',
'DrydockRepositoryOperationListController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockRepositoryOperationListController.php',
'DrydockRepositoryOperationPHIDType' => 'applications/drydock/phid/DrydockRepositoryOperationPHIDType.php',
'DrydockRepositoryOperationQuery' => 'applications/drydock/query/DrydockRepositoryOperationQuery.php',
'DrydockRepositoryOperationSearchEngine' => 'applications/drydock/query/DrydockRepositoryOperationSearchEngine.php',
'DrydockRepositoryOperationStatusController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockRepositoryOperationStatusController.php',
'DrydockRepositoryOperationStatusView' => 'applications/drydock/view/DrydockRepositoryOperationStatusView.php',
'DrydockRepositoryOperationType' => 'applications/drydock/operation/DrydockRepositoryOperationType.php',
'DrydockRepositoryOperationUpdateWorker' => 'applications/drydock/worker/DrydockRepositoryOperationUpdateWorker.php',
'DrydockRepositoryOperationViewController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockRepositoryOperationViewController.php',
'DrydockResource' => 'applications/drydock/storage/DrydockResource.php',
'DrydockResourceActivationFailureLogType' => 'applications/drydock/logtype/DrydockResourceActivationFailureLogType.php',
'DrydockResourceActivationYieldLogType' => 'applications/drydock/logtype/DrydockResourceActivationYieldLogType.php',
'DrydockResourceController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockResourceController.php',
'DrydockResourceDatasource' => 'applications/drydock/typeahead/DrydockResourceDatasource.php',
'DrydockResourceListController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockResourceListController.php',
'DrydockResourceListView' => 'applications/drydock/view/DrydockResourceListView.php',
'DrydockResourcePHIDType' => 'applications/drydock/phid/DrydockResourcePHIDType.php',
'DrydockResourceQuery' => 'applications/drydock/query/DrydockResourceQuery.php',
Add a command queue to Drydock to manage lease/resource release Summary: Ref T9252. Broadly, Drydock currently races on releasing objects from the "active" state. To reproduce this: - Scatter some sleep()s pretty much anywhere in the release code. - Release several times from web UI or CLI in quick succession. Resources or leases will execute some release code twice or otherwise do inconsistent things. (I didn't chase down a detailed reproduction scenario for this since inspection of the code makes it clear that there are no meaningful locks or mechanisms preventing this.) Instead, add a Harbormaster-style command queue to resources and leases. When something wants to do a release, it adds a command to the queue and schedules a worker. The workers acquire a lock, then try to consume commands from the queue. This guarantees that only one process is responsible for writes to active resource/leases. This is the last major step to giving resources and leases a single writer during all states: - Resource, Unsaved: AllocatorWorker - Resource, Pending: ResourceWorker (Possible rename to "Allocated?") - Resource, Open: This diff, ResourceUpdateWorker. (Likely rename to "Active"). - Resource, Closed/Broken: Future destruction worker. (Likely rename to "Released" / "Broken"; maybe remove "Broken"). - Resource, Destroyed: No writes. - Lease, Unsaved: Whatever wants the lease. - Lease, Pending: AllocatorWorker - Lease, Acquired: LeaseWorker - Lease, Active: This diff, LeaseUpdateWorker. - Lease, Released/Broken: Future destruction worker (Maybe remove "Broken"?) - Lease, Expired: No writes. (Likely rename to "Destroyed"). In most phases, we can already guarantee that there is a single writer without doing any extra work. This is more complicated in the "Active" case because the release buttons on the web UI, the release tools on the CLI, the lease requestor itself, the garbage collector, and any other release process cleaning up related objects may try to effect a release. All of these could race one another (and, in many cases, race other processes from other phases because all of these get to act immediately) as this code is currently written. Using a queue here lets us make sure there's only a single writer in this phase. One thing which is notable is that whatever acquires a lease **can not write to it**! It is never the writer once it queues the lease for activation. It can not write to any resources, either. And, likewise, Blueprints can not write to resources while acquiring or releasing leases. We may need to provide a mechinism so that blueprints and/or resource/lease holders get to attach some storage to resources/leases for bookkeeping. For example, a blueprint might need to keep some kind of cache on a resource to help it manage state. But I think we can cross that bridge when we come to it, and nothing else would need to write to this storage so it's technically straightforward to introduce such a mechanism if we need one. Test Plan: - Viewed buttons in web UI, checked enabled/disabled states. - Clicked the buttons. - Saw commands show up in the command queue. - Saw some daemon stuff get scheduled. - Ran CLI tools, saw commands get consumed and resources/leases release. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9252 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14143
2015-09-23 16:42:08 +02:00
'DrydockResourceReleaseController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockResourceReleaseController.php',
'DrydockResourceSearchEngine' => 'applications/drydock/query/DrydockResourceSearchEngine.php',
'DrydockResourceStatus' => 'applications/drydock/constants/DrydockResourceStatus.php',
Add a command queue to Drydock to manage lease/resource release Summary: Ref T9252. Broadly, Drydock currently races on releasing objects from the "active" state. To reproduce this: - Scatter some sleep()s pretty much anywhere in the release code. - Release several times from web UI or CLI in quick succession. Resources or leases will execute some release code twice or otherwise do inconsistent things. (I didn't chase down a detailed reproduction scenario for this since inspection of the code makes it clear that there are no meaningful locks or mechanisms preventing this.) Instead, add a Harbormaster-style command queue to resources and leases. When something wants to do a release, it adds a command to the queue and schedules a worker. The workers acquire a lock, then try to consume commands from the queue. This guarantees that only one process is responsible for writes to active resource/leases. This is the last major step to giving resources and leases a single writer during all states: - Resource, Unsaved: AllocatorWorker - Resource, Pending: ResourceWorker (Possible rename to "Allocated?") - Resource, Open: This diff, ResourceUpdateWorker. (Likely rename to "Active"). - Resource, Closed/Broken: Future destruction worker. (Likely rename to "Released" / "Broken"; maybe remove "Broken"). - Resource, Destroyed: No writes. - Lease, Unsaved: Whatever wants the lease. - Lease, Pending: AllocatorWorker - Lease, Acquired: LeaseWorker - Lease, Active: This diff, LeaseUpdateWorker. - Lease, Released/Broken: Future destruction worker (Maybe remove "Broken"?) - Lease, Expired: No writes. (Likely rename to "Destroyed"). In most phases, we can already guarantee that there is a single writer without doing any extra work. This is more complicated in the "Active" case because the release buttons on the web UI, the release tools on the CLI, the lease requestor itself, the garbage collector, and any other release process cleaning up related objects may try to effect a release. All of these could race one another (and, in many cases, race other processes from other phases because all of these get to act immediately) as this code is currently written. Using a queue here lets us make sure there's only a single writer in this phase. One thing which is notable is that whatever acquires a lease **can not write to it**! It is never the writer once it queues the lease for activation. It can not write to any resources, either. And, likewise, Blueprints can not write to resources while acquiring or releasing leases. We may need to provide a mechinism so that blueprints and/or resource/lease holders get to attach some storage to resources/leases for bookkeeping. For example, a blueprint might need to keep some kind of cache on a resource to help it manage state. But I think we can cross that bridge when we come to it, and nothing else would need to write to this storage so it's technically straightforward to introduce such a mechanism if we need one. Test Plan: - Viewed buttons in web UI, checked enabled/disabled states. - Clicked the buttons. - Saw commands show up in the command queue. - Saw some daemon stuff get scheduled. - Ran CLI tools, saw commands get consumed and resources/leases release. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9252 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14143
2015-09-23 16:42:08 +02:00
'DrydockResourceUpdateWorker' => 'applications/drydock/worker/DrydockResourceUpdateWorker.php',
'DrydockResourceViewController' => 'applications/drydock/controller/DrydockResourceViewController.php',
'DrydockSFTPFilesystemInterface' => 'applications/drydock/interface/filesystem/DrydockSFTPFilesystemInterface.php',
'DrydockSSHCommandInterface' => 'applications/drydock/interface/command/DrydockSSHCommandInterface.php',
Implement optimistic "slot locks" in Drydock Summary: See discussion in D10304. There's a lot of context there, but the general idea is: - Blueprints should manage locks in a granular way during the actual allocation/acquisition phase. - Optimistic "slot locks" might a pretty good primitive to make that easy to implement and reason about in most cases. The way these locks work is that you just pick some name for the lock (like the PHID of a resource) and say that it needs to be acquired for the allocation/acquisition to work: ``` ... ->needSlotLock("mylock(PHID-XYZQ-...)") ... ``` When you fire off the acquisition or allocation, it fails unless it could acquire the slot with that name. This is really simple (no explicit lock management) and a pretty good fit for most of the locking that blueprints and leases need to do. If you need to do limit-based locks (e.g., maximum of 3 locks) you could acquire a lock like this: ``` mylock(whatever).slot(2) ``` Blueprints generally only contend with themselves, so it's normally OK for them to pick whatever strategy works best for them in naming locks. This may not work as well if you have a huge number of slots (e.g., 100TB you want to give out in 1MB chunks), or other complex needs for locks (like you have to synchronize access to some external resource), but slot locks don't need to be the only mechanism that blueprints use. If they run into a problem that slot locks aren't a good fit for, they can use something else instead. For now, slot locks seem like a good fit for the problems we currently face and most of the problems I anticipate facing. (The release workflows have other race issues which I'm not addressing here. They work fine if nothing races, but aren't race-safe.) Test Plan: To create a race where the same binding is allocated as a resource twice: - Add `sleep(10)` near the beginning of `allocateResource()`, after the free bindings are loaded but before resources are allocated. - (Comment out slot lock acquisition if you have this patch.) - Run `bin/drydock lease ...` in two windows, within 10 seconds of one another. This will reliably double-allocate the binding because both blueprints see a view of the world where the binding is free. To verify the lock works, un-comment it (or apply this patch) and run the same test again. Now, the lock fails in one process and only one resource is allocated. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: hach-que, chad Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14118
2015-09-21 13:45:25 +02:00
'DrydockSlotLock' => 'applications/drydock/storage/DrydockSlotLock.php',
'DrydockSlotLockException' => 'applications/drydock/exception/DrydockSlotLockException.php',
'DrydockSlotLockFailureLogType' => 'applications/drydock/logtype/DrydockSlotLockFailureLogType.php',
'DrydockTestRepositoryOperation' => 'applications/drydock/operation/DrydockTestRepositoryOperation.php',
'DrydockWebrootInterface' => 'applications/drydock/interface/webroot/DrydockWebrootInterface.php',
'DrydockWorker' => 'applications/drydock/worker/DrydockWorker.php',
'DrydockWorkingCopyBlueprintImplementation' => 'applications/drydock/blueprint/DrydockWorkingCopyBlueprintImplementation.php',
'FeedConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/feed/conduit/FeedConduitAPIMethod.php',
'FeedPublishConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/feed/conduit/FeedPublishConduitAPIMethod.php',
Push feed publishing deeper into the task queue Summary: Ref T2852. I want to model Asana integration as a response to feed events. Currently, we queue one feed event for each HTTP hook. Instead, always queue one feed event and then have it queue any necessary followup events (now, http hooks; soon, asana). Add a script to make it easy to reproducibly fire feed event publishing. Test Plan: Republished a feed event and verified it hit configured HTTP hooks correctly. $ ./bin/feed republish 5765774156541908292 --trace >>> [2] <connect> phabricator2_feed <<< [2] <connect> 1,660 us >>> [3] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC <<< [3] <query> 595 us >>> [4] <connect> phabricator2_differential <<< [4] <connect> 760 us >>> [5] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [5] <query> 478 us >>> [6] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [6] <query> 449 us >>> [7] <connect> phabricator2_user <<< [7] <connect> 1,062 us >>> [8] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') <<< [8] <query> 540 us >>> [9] <connect> phabricator2_file <<< [9] <connect> 951 us >>> [10] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7') <<< [10] <query> 498 us >>> [11] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo <<< [11] <query> 507 us Republishing story... >>> [12] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC <<< [12] <query> 685 us >>> [13] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [13] <query> 489 us >>> [14] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [14] <query> 512 us >>> [15] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') <<< [15] <query> 601 us >>> [16] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7') <<< [16] <query> 405 us >>> [17] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo <<< [17] <query> 551 us >>> [18] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC <<< [18] <query> 507 us >>> [19] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [19] <query> 428 us >>> [20] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [20] <query> 419 us >>> [21] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') <<< [21] <query> 591 us >>> [22] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7') <<< [22] <query> 406 us >>> [23] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo <<< [23] <query> 593 us >>> [24] <http> http://127.0.0.1/derp/ <<< [24] <http> 746,157 us [2013-06-24 20:23:26] EXCEPTION: (HTTPFutureResponseStatusHTTP) [HTTP/500] Internal Server Error Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2852 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6291
2013-06-26 01:29:47 +02:00
'FeedPublisherHTTPWorker' => 'applications/feed/worker/FeedPublisherHTTPWorker.php',
'FeedPublisherWorker' => 'applications/feed/worker/FeedPublisherWorker.php',
Push feed publishing deeper into the task queue Summary: Ref T2852. I want to model Asana integration as a response to feed events. Currently, we queue one feed event for each HTTP hook. Instead, always queue one feed event and then have it queue any necessary followup events (now, http hooks; soon, asana). Add a script to make it easy to reproducibly fire feed event publishing. Test Plan: Republished a feed event and verified it hit configured HTTP hooks correctly. $ ./bin/feed republish 5765774156541908292 --trace >>> [2] <connect> phabricator2_feed <<< [2] <connect> 1,660 us >>> [3] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC <<< [3] <query> 595 us >>> [4] <connect> phabricator2_differential <<< [4] <connect> 760 us >>> [5] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [5] <query> 478 us >>> [6] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [6] <query> 449 us >>> [7] <connect> phabricator2_user <<< [7] <connect> 1,062 us >>> [8] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') <<< [8] <query> 540 us >>> [9] <connect> phabricator2_file <<< [9] <connect> 951 us >>> [10] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7') <<< [10] <query> 498 us >>> [11] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo <<< [11] <query> 507 us Republishing story... >>> [12] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC <<< [12] <query> 685 us >>> [13] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [13] <query> 489 us >>> [14] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [14] <query> 512 us >>> [15] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') <<< [15] <query> 601 us >>> [16] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7') <<< [16] <query> 405 us >>> [17] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo <<< [17] <query> 551 us >>> [18] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC <<< [18] <query> 507 us >>> [19] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [19] <query> 428 us >>> [20] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [20] <query> 419 us >>> [21] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') <<< [21] <query> 591 us >>> [22] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7') <<< [22] <query> 406 us >>> [23] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo <<< [23] <query> 593 us >>> [24] <http> http://127.0.0.1/derp/ <<< [24] <http> 746,157 us [2013-06-24 20:23:26] EXCEPTION: (HTTPFutureResponseStatusHTTP) [HTTP/500] Internal Server Error Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2852 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6291
2013-06-26 01:29:47 +02:00
'FeedPushWorker' => 'applications/feed/worker/FeedPushWorker.php',
'FeedQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/feed/conduit/FeedQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'FeedStoryNotificationGarbageCollector' => 'applications/notification/garbagecollector/FeedStoryNotificationGarbageCollector.php',
Add a chunking storage engine for files Summary: Ref T7149. This isn't complete and isn't active yet, but does basically work. I'll shore it up in the next few diffs. The new workflow goes like this: > Client, file.allocate(): I'd like to upload a file with length L, metadata M, and hash H. Then the server returns `upload` (a boolean) and `filePHID` (a PHID). These mean: | upload | filePHID | means | |---|---|---| | false | false | Server can't accept file. | false | true | File data already known, file created from hash. | true | false | Just upload normally. | true | true | Query chunks to start or resume a chunked upload. All but the last case are uninteresting and work like exising uploads with `file.uploadhash` (which we can eventually deprecate). In the last case: > Client, file.querychunks(): Give me a list of chunks that I should upload. This returns all the chunks for the file. Chunks have a start byte, an end byte, and a "complete" flag to indicate that the server already has the data. Then, the client fills in chunks by sending them: > Client, file.uploadchunk(): Here is the data for one chunk. This stuff doesn't work yet or has some caveats: - I haven't tested resume much. - Files need an "isPartial()" flag for partial uploads, and the UI needs to respect it. - The JS client needs to become chunk-aware. - Chunk size is set crazy low to make testing easier. - Some debugging flags that I'll remove soon-ish. - Downloading works, but still streams the whole file into memory. - This storage engine is disabled by default (hardcoded as a unit test engine) because it's still sketchy. - Need some code to remove the "isParital" flag when the last chunk is uploaded. - Maybe do checksumming on chunks. Test Plan: - Hacked up `arc upload` (see next diff) to be chunk-aware and uploaded a readme in 18 32-byte chunks. Then downloaded it. Got the same file back that I uploaded. - File UI now shows some basic chunk info for chunked files: {F336434} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7149 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12060
2015-03-13 19:30:02 +01:00
'FileAllocateConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/files/conduit/FileAllocateConduitAPIMethod.php',
'FileConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/files/conduit/FileConduitAPIMethod.php',
'FileCreateMailReceiver' => 'applications/files/mail/FileCreateMailReceiver.php',
'FileDownloadConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/files/conduit/FileDownloadConduitAPIMethod.php',
'FileInfoConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/files/conduit/FileInfoConduitAPIMethod.php',
'FileMailReceiver' => 'applications/files/mail/FileMailReceiver.php',
Add a chunking storage engine for files Summary: Ref T7149. This isn't complete and isn't active yet, but does basically work. I'll shore it up in the next few diffs. The new workflow goes like this: > Client, file.allocate(): I'd like to upload a file with length L, metadata M, and hash H. Then the server returns `upload` (a boolean) and `filePHID` (a PHID). These mean: | upload | filePHID | means | |---|---|---| | false | false | Server can't accept file. | false | true | File data already known, file created from hash. | true | false | Just upload normally. | true | true | Query chunks to start or resume a chunked upload. All but the last case are uninteresting and work like exising uploads with `file.uploadhash` (which we can eventually deprecate). In the last case: > Client, file.querychunks(): Give me a list of chunks that I should upload. This returns all the chunks for the file. Chunks have a start byte, an end byte, and a "complete" flag to indicate that the server already has the data. Then, the client fills in chunks by sending them: > Client, file.uploadchunk(): Here is the data for one chunk. This stuff doesn't work yet or has some caveats: - I haven't tested resume much. - Files need an "isPartial()" flag for partial uploads, and the UI needs to respect it. - The JS client needs to become chunk-aware. - Chunk size is set crazy low to make testing easier. - Some debugging flags that I'll remove soon-ish. - Downloading works, but still streams the whole file into memory. - This storage engine is disabled by default (hardcoded as a unit test engine) because it's still sketchy. - Need some code to remove the "isParital" flag when the last chunk is uploaded. - Maybe do checksumming on chunks. Test Plan: - Hacked up `arc upload` (see next diff) to be chunk-aware and uploaded a readme in 18 32-byte chunks. Then downloaded it. Got the same file back that I uploaded. - File UI now shows some basic chunk info for chunked files: {F336434} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7149 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12060
2015-03-13 19:30:02 +01:00
'FileQueryChunksConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/files/conduit/FileQueryChunksConduitAPIMethod.php',
'FileReplyHandler' => 'applications/files/mail/FileReplyHandler.php',
Add a chunking storage engine for files Summary: Ref T7149. This isn't complete and isn't active yet, but does basically work. I'll shore it up in the next few diffs. The new workflow goes like this: > Client, file.allocate(): I'd like to upload a file with length L, metadata M, and hash H. Then the server returns `upload` (a boolean) and `filePHID` (a PHID). These mean: | upload | filePHID | means | |---|---|---| | false | false | Server can't accept file. | false | true | File data already known, file created from hash. | true | false | Just upload normally. | true | true | Query chunks to start or resume a chunked upload. All but the last case are uninteresting and work like exising uploads with `file.uploadhash` (which we can eventually deprecate). In the last case: > Client, file.querychunks(): Give me a list of chunks that I should upload. This returns all the chunks for the file. Chunks have a start byte, an end byte, and a "complete" flag to indicate that the server already has the data. Then, the client fills in chunks by sending them: > Client, file.uploadchunk(): Here is the data for one chunk. This stuff doesn't work yet or has some caveats: - I haven't tested resume much. - Files need an "isPartial()" flag for partial uploads, and the UI needs to respect it. - The JS client needs to become chunk-aware. - Chunk size is set crazy low to make testing easier. - Some debugging flags that I'll remove soon-ish. - Downloading works, but still streams the whole file into memory. - This storage engine is disabled by default (hardcoded as a unit test engine) because it's still sketchy. - Need some code to remove the "isParital" flag when the last chunk is uploaded. - Maybe do checksumming on chunks. Test Plan: - Hacked up `arc upload` (see next diff) to be chunk-aware and uploaded a readme in 18 32-byte chunks. Then downloaded it. Got the same file back that I uploaded. - File UI now shows some basic chunk info for chunked files: {F336434} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7149 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12060
2015-03-13 19:30:02 +01:00
'FileUploadChunkConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/files/conduit/FileUploadChunkConduitAPIMethod.php',
'FileUploadConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/files/conduit/FileUploadConduitAPIMethod.php',
'FileUploadHashConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/files/conduit/FileUploadHashConduitAPIMethod.php',
'FilesDefaultViewCapability' => 'applications/files/capability/FilesDefaultViewCapability.php',
'FlagConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/flag/conduit/FlagConduitAPIMethod.php',
'FlagDeleteConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/flag/conduit/FlagDeleteConduitAPIMethod.php',
'FlagEditConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/flag/conduit/FlagEditConduitAPIMethod.php',
'FlagQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/flag/conduit/FlagQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'FundBacker' => 'applications/fund/storage/FundBacker.php',
'FundBackerCart' => 'applications/fund/phortune/FundBackerCart.php',
'FundBackerEditor' => 'applications/fund/editor/FundBackerEditor.php',
'FundBackerListController' => 'applications/fund/controller/FundBackerListController.php',
'FundBackerPHIDType' => 'applications/fund/phid/FundBackerPHIDType.php',
'FundBackerProduct' => 'applications/fund/phortune/FundBackerProduct.php',
'FundBackerQuery' => 'applications/fund/query/FundBackerQuery.php',
'FundBackerSearchEngine' => 'applications/fund/query/FundBackerSearchEngine.php',
'FundBackerTransaction' => 'applications/fund/storage/FundBackerTransaction.php',
'FundBackerTransactionQuery' => 'applications/fund/query/FundBackerTransactionQuery.php',
'FundController' => 'applications/fund/controller/FundController.php',
'FundCreateInitiativesCapability' => 'applications/fund/capability/FundCreateInitiativesCapability.php',
'FundDAO' => 'applications/fund/storage/FundDAO.php',
'FundDefaultViewCapability' => 'applications/fund/capability/FundDefaultViewCapability.php',
'FundInitiative' => 'applications/fund/storage/FundInitiative.php',
'FundInitiativeBackController' => 'applications/fund/controller/FundInitiativeBackController.php',
'FundInitiativeCloseController' => 'applications/fund/controller/FundInitiativeCloseController.php',
'FundInitiativeEditController' => 'applications/fund/controller/FundInitiativeEditController.php',
'FundInitiativeEditor' => 'applications/fund/editor/FundInitiativeEditor.php',
'FundInitiativeIndexer' => 'applications/fund/search/FundInitiativeIndexer.php',
'FundInitiativeListController' => 'applications/fund/controller/FundInitiativeListController.php',
'FundInitiativePHIDType' => 'applications/fund/phid/FundInitiativePHIDType.php',
'FundInitiativeQuery' => 'applications/fund/query/FundInitiativeQuery.php',
'FundInitiativeRemarkupRule' => 'applications/fund/remarkup/FundInitiativeRemarkupRule.php',
'FundInitiativeReplyHandler' => 'applications/fund/mail/FundInitiativeReplyHandler.php',
'FundInitiativeSearchEngine' => 'applications/fund/query/FundInitiativeSearchEngine.php',
'FundInitiativeTransaction' => 'applications/fund/storage/FundInitiativeTransaction.php',
'FundInitiativeTransactionQuery' => 'applications/fund/query/FundInitiativeTransactionQuery.php',
'FundInitiativeViewController' => 'applications/fund/controller/FundInitiativeViewController.php',
'FundSchemaSpec' => 'applications/fund/storage/FundSchemaSpec.php',
Add "Autoplans" to Harbormaster Summary: Ref T8095. Two general problems: - I want Harbormaster to own all lint and unit test results. - I don't want users to have to configure anything for `arc` to keep working automatically. These are in conflict because generic lint/unit test ownership in Harbormaster requires that build targets exist which we can attach build results to. However, we can't currently create build targets on demand: Harbormaster assumes it is responsible for creating targets, then running code or making third-party service calls to actually run the builds. I considered two broad approaches to let `arc` push results into Harbormaster without requiring administrators to configure some kind of "arc results" build plan: # Add magic target PHIDs like `PHID-MAGIC-this-is-really-arc-unit`. # Add new code to build real targets with real PHIDs. (1) is probably a bit less work to get off the ground, but I think it's worse overall and very likely to create more problems in the long run. I particularly worry that it will lead to a small amount of special casing in a very large number of places, which seems more fragile. (2) is more work upfront but I think does a better job of putting all the special casing in one place that we can, e.g., more reasonably unit test, and letting the rest of the code rarely/never care about this case since it's just dealing with normal plans/steps/targets as far as it can tell. This diff introduces "autoplans", which are source templates for plans/steps. This let us "push" these targets into Harbormaster. Hypthetically, any process "like" arc can use autoplans to upload test/lint/etc results. In practice, probably only `arc` will ever use this, but I think it's still quite a bit cleaner than the alternative despite all the generality. Workflow is basically: - `arc` creates a diff. - `arc` calls `harbormaster.queryautotargets`, passing the diff PHID and saying "I have some lint and unit results I want to stick on this thing". - Harbormaster builds the plan, steps, and targets (if any of them don't already exist), and hands back the target PHIDs so `arc` has a completely standard-looking place to put results. - `arc` uploads the test results to the right targets, as though Harbormaster had asked it to run unit/lint in the first place. (This doesn't actually do any of that yet, just sets things up.) I'll maybe doc turn that ^^^^^^ into a doc for posterity since I think it's hard to guess what an "autotarget" is, but I'm going to grab some lunch first. Test Plan: - Added unit tests to make sure we can build these things properly. - Used `harbormaster.queryautotargets` to build autotargets for a bunch of diffs. - Verified targets come up in "waiting for message" state. - Verified plans and steps are not editable. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T8095 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13345
2015-06-21 18:04:21 +02:00
'HarbormasterArcLintBuildStepImplementation' => 'applications/harbormaster/step/HarbormasterArcLintBuildStepImplementation.php',
'HarbormasterArcUnitBuildStepImplementation' => 'applications/harbormaster/step/HarbormasterArcUnitBuildStepImplementation.php',
Add `harbormaster.createartifact` Summary: Ref T8659. In the general case, this eventually allows build processes to do things like: - Upload build results (like a ".app" or ".exe" or other binary). - Pass complex results between build steps (e.g., build step A does something hard and build step B uses it to do something else). Today, we're a long way away from having the infrastructure for that. However, it is useful to let third party build processes (like Jenkins) upload URIs that link back to the external build results. This adds `harbormaster.createartifact` so they can do that. The only useful thing to do with this method today is have your Jenkins build do this: params = array( "uri": "https://jenkins.mycompany.com/build/23923/details/", "name": "View Build Results in Jenkins", "ui.external": true, ); harbormaster.createartifact(target, 'uri', params); Then (after the next diff) we'll show a link in Differential and a prominent link in Harbormaster. I didn't actually do the UI stuff in this diff since it's already pretty big. This change moves a lot of code around, too: - Adds PHIDs to artifacts. - It modularizes build artifact types (currently "file", "host" and "URI"). - It formalizes build artifact parameters and construction: - This lets me generate usable documentation about how to create artifacts. - This prevents users from doing dangerous or policy-violating things. - It does some other general modernization. Test Plan: {F715633} {F715634} Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T8659 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13900
2015-08-15 16:28:56 +02:00
'HarbormasterArtifact' => 'applications/harbormaster/artifact/HarbormasterArtifact.php',
Add "Autoplans" to Harbormaster Summary: Ref T8095. Two general problems: - I want Harbormaster to own all lint and unit test results. - I don't want users to have to configure anything for `arc` to keep working automatically. These are in conflict because generic lint/unit test ownership in Harbormaster requires that build targets exist which we can attach build results to. However, we can't currently create build targets on demand: Harbormaster assumes it is responsible for creating targets, then running code or making third-party service calls to actually run the builds. I considered two broad approaches to let `arc` push results into Harbormaster without requiring administrators to configure some kind of "arc results" build plan: # Add magic target PHIDs like `PHID-MAGIC-this-is-really-arc-unit`. # Add new code to build real targets with real PHIDs. (1) is probably a bit less work to get off the ground, but I think it's worse overall and very likely to create more problems in the long run. I particularly worry that it will lead to a small amount of special casing in a very large number of places, which seems more fragile. (2) is more work upfront but I think does a better job of putting all the special casing in one place that we can, e.g., more reasonably unit test, and letting the rest of the code rarely/never care about this case since it's just dealing with normal plans/steps/targets as far as it can tell. This diff introduces "autoplans", which are source templates for plans/steps. This let us "push" these targets into Harbormaster. Hypthetically, any process "like" arc can use autoplans to upload test/lint/etc results. In practice, probably only `arc` will ever use this, but I think it's still quite a bit cleaner than the alternative despite all the generality. Workflow is basically: - `arc` creates a diff. - `arc` calls `harbormaster.queryautotargets`, passing the diff PHID and saying "I have some lint and unit results I want to stick on this thing". - Harbormaster builds the plan, steps, and targets (if any of them don't already exist), and hands back the target PHIDs so `arc` has a completely standard-looking place to put results. - `arc` uploads the test results to the right targets, as though Harbormaster had asked it to run unit/lint in the first place. (This doesn't actually do any of that yet, just sets things up.) I'll maybe doc turn that ^^^^^^ into a doc for posterity since I think it's hard to guess what an "autotarget" is, but I'm going to grab some lunch first. Test Plan: - Added unit tests to make sure we can build these things properly. - Used `harbormaster.queryautotargets` to build autotargets for a bunch of diffs. - Verified targets come up in "waiting for message" state. - Verified plans and steps are not editable. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T8095 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13345
2015-06-21 18:04:21 +02:00
'HarbormasterAutotargetsTestCase' => 'applications/harbormaster/__tests__/HarbormasterAutotargetsTestCase.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuild' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/build/HarbormasterBuild.php',
'HarbormasterBuildAbortedException' => 'applications/harbormaster/exception/HarbormasterBuildAbortedException.php',
'HarbormasterBuildActionController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterBuildActionController.php',
Add "Autoplans" to Harbormaster Summary: Ref T8095. Two general problems: - I want Harbormaster to own all lint and unit test results. - I don't want users to have to configure anything for `arc` to keep working automatically. These are in conflict because generic lint/unit test ownership in Harbormaster requires that build targets exist which we can attach build results to. However, we can't currently create build targets on demand: Harbormaster assumes it is responsible for creating targets, then running code or making third-party service calls to actually run the builds. I considered two broad approaches to let `arc` push results into Harbormaster without requiring administrators to configure some kind of "arc results" build plan: # Add magic target PHIDs like `PHID-MAGIC-this-is-really-arc-unit`. # Add new code to build real targets with real PHIDs. (1) is probably a bit less work to get off the ground, but I think it's worse overall and very likely to create more problems in the long run. I particularly worry that it will lead to a small amount of special casing in a very large number of places, which seems more fragile. (2) is more work upfront but I think does a better job of putting all the special casing in one place that we can, e.g., more reasonably unit test, and letting the rest of the code rarely/never care about this case since it's just dealing with normal plans/steps/targets as far as it can tell. This diff introduces "autoplans", which are source templates for plans/steps. This let us "push" these targets into Harbormaster. Hypthetically, any process "like" arc can use autoplans to upload test/lint/etc results. In practice, probably only `arc` will ever use this, but I think it's still quite a bit cleaner than the alternative despite all the generality. Workflow is basically: - `arc` creates a diff. - `arc` calls `harbormaster.queryautotargets`, passing the diff PHID and saying "I have some lint and unit results I want to stick on this thing". - Harbormaster builds the plan, steps, and targets (if any of them don't already exist), and hands back the target PHIDs so `arc` has a completely standard-looking place to put results. - `arc` uploads the test results to the right targets, as though Harbormaster had asked it to run unit/lint in the first place. (This doesn't actually do any of that yet, just sets things up.) I'll maybe doc turn that ^^^^^^ into a doc for posterity since I think it's hard to guess what an "autotarget" is, but I'm going to grab some lunch first. Test Plan: - Added unit tests to make sure we can build these things properly. - Used `harbormaster.queryautotargets` to build autotargets for a bunch of diffs. - Verified targets come up in "waiting for message" state. - Verified plans and steps are not editable. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T8095 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13345
2015-06-21 18:04:21 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildArcanistAutoplan' => 'applications/harbormaster/autoplan/HarbormasterBuildArcanistAutoplan.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildArtifact' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/build/HarbormasterBuildArtifact.php',
Add `harbormaster.createartifact` Summary: Ref T8659. In the general case, this eventually allows build processes to do things like: - Upload build results (like a ".app" or ".exe" or other binary). - Pass complex results between build steps (e.g., build step A does something hard and build step B uses it to do something else). Today, we're a long way away from having the infrastructure for that. However, it is useful to let third party build processes (like Jenkins) upload URIs that link back to the external build results. This adds `harbormaster.createartifact` so they can do that. The only useful thing to do with this method today is have your Jenkins build do this: params = array( "uri": "https://jenkins.mycompany.com/build/23923/details/", "name": "View Build Results in Jenkins", "ui.external": true, ); harbormaster.createartifact(target, 'uri', params); Then (after the next diff) we'll show a link in Differential and a prominent link in Harbormaster. I didn't actually do the UI stuff in this diff since it's already pretty big. This change moves a lot of code around, too: - Adds PHIDs to artifacts. - It modularizes build artifact types (currently "file", "host" and "URI"). - It formalizes build artifact parameters and construction: - This lets me generate usable documentation about how to create artifacts. - This prevents users from doing dangerous or policy-violating things. - It does some other general modernization. Test Plan: {F715633} {F715634} Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T8659 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13900
2015-08-15 16:28:56 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildArtifactPHIDType' => 'applications/harbormaster/phid/HarbormasterBuildArtifactPHIDType.php',
'HarbormasterBuildArtifactQuery' => 'applications/harbormaster/query/HarbormasterBuildArtifactQuery.php',
Add "Autoplans" to Harbormaster Summary: Ref T8095. Two general problems: - I want Harbormaster to own all lint and unit test results. - I don't want users to have to configure anything for `arc` to keep working automatically. These are in conflict because generic lint/unit test ownership in Harbormaster requires that build targets exist which we can attach build results to. However, we can't currently create build targets on demand: Harbormaster assumes it is responsible for creating targets, then running code or making third-party service calls to actually run the builds. I considered two broad approaches to let `arc` push results into Harbormaster without requiring administrators to configure some kind of "arc results" build plan: # Add magic target PHIDs like `PHID-MAGIC-this-is-really-arc-unit`. # Add new code to build real targets with real PHIDs. (1) is probably a bit less work to get off the ground, but I think it's worse overall and very likely to create more problems in the long run. I particularly worry that it will lead to a small amount of special casing in a very large number of places, which seems more fragile. (2) is more work upfront but I think does a better job of putting all the special casing in one place that we can, e.g., more reasonably unit test, and letting the rest of the code rarely/never care about this case since it's just dealing with normal plans/steps/targets as far as it can tell. This diff introduces "autoplans", which are source templates for plans/steps. This let us "push" these targets into Harbormaster. Hypthetically, any process "like" arc can use autoplans to upload test/lint/etc results. In practice, probably only `arc` will ever use this, but I think it's still quite a bit cleaner than the alternative despite all the generality. Workflow is basically: - `arc` creates a diff. - `arc` calls `harbormaster.queryautotargets`, passing the diff PHID and saying "I have some lint and unit results I want to stick on this thing". - Harbormaster builds the plan, steps, and targets (if any of them don't already exist), and hands back the target PHIDs so `arc` has a completely standard-looking place to put results. - `arc` uploads the test results to the right targets, as though Harbormaster had asked it to run unit/lint in the first place. (This doesn't actually do any of that yet, just sets things up.) I'll maybe doc turn that ^^^^^^ into a doc for posterity since I think it's hard to guess what an "autotarget" is, but I'm going to grab some lunch first. Test Plan: - Added unit tests to make sure we can build these things properly. - Used `harbormaster.queryautotargets` to build autotargets for a bunch of diffs. - Verified targets come up in "waiting for message" state. - Verified plans and steps are not editable. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T8095 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13345
2015-06-21 18:04:21 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildAutoplan' => 'applications/harbormaster/autoplan/HarbormasterBuildAutoplan.php',
'HarbormasterBuildCommand' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/HarbormasterBuildCommand.php',
'HarbormasterBuildDependencyDatasource' => 'applications/harbormaster/typeahead/HarbormasterBuildDependencyDatasource.php',
'HarbormasterBuildEngine' => 'applications/harbormaster/engine/HarbormasterBuildEngine.php',
'HarbormasterBuildFailureException' => 'applications/harbormaster/exception/HarbormasterBuildFailureException.php',
'HarbormasterBuildGraph' => 'applications/harbormaster/engine/HarbormasterBuildGraph.php',
'HarbormasterBuildLintMessage' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/build/HarbormasterBuildLintMessage.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildLog' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/build/HarbormasterBuildLog.php',
'HarbormasterBuildLogPHIDType' => 'applications/harbormaster/phid/HarbormasterBuildLogPHIDType.php',
'HarbormasterBuildLogQuery' => 'applications/harbormaster/query/HarbormasterBuildLogQuery.php',
Allow external systems to send messages to build targets Summary: Ref T1049. Allows external systems to send a message to a build target. The primary intended use case is: - You make an HTTP request to Jenkins. - The build goes into a "waiting" state. - Later, Jenkins calls `harbormaster.sendmessage` to report that the target passed or failed. - The build continues as appropriate. This is deceptively complicated because: - There are a lot of race concerns. We might get a message back from an external system before it even responds to the request we made. We want to make sure we process these messages no matter when we receive them. - These messages need to be sent to a build target (vs a build or buildable) because we'll get into trouble with parallelization later on otherwise (Jenkins is told to do 3 builds; we can't tell which ones failed or what overall state is unless the message are sent to targets). - I initially thought about implementing this as a separate "Wait for a response from an external system" build step. This gets a lot more complicated for users once we do parallelization, though. Particularly, in the case where you've told Jenkins to do 3 builds, the three "wait" steps need to know which target they're waiting for (and jenkins needs to know some unique identifier for each target). So this pretty much boils down to a more complicated, more error-prone version of using target PHIDs. This makes the already-muddy Build UI a bit worse, but it needs a general clarity pass anyway (it's showing way too much uninteresting data, and should show a better summary of results instead). Test Plan: - This doesn't really do anything interesting yet. - Used Conduit to send messages to build plans. - Viewed the messages on the build screen. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8604
2014-03-26 00:11:28 +01:00
'HarbormasterBuildMessage' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/HarbormasterBuildMessage.php',
'HarbormasterBuildMessageQuery' => 'applications/harbormaster/query/HarbormasterBuildMessageQuery.php',
'HarbormasterBuildPHIDType' => 'applications/harbormaster/phid/HarbormasterBuildPHIDType.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildPlan' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/configuration/HarbormasterBuildPlan.php',
'HarbormasterBuildPlanDatasource' => 'applications/harbormaster/typeahead/HarbormasterBuildPlanDatasource.php',
'HarbormasterBuildPlanDefaultEditCapability' => 'applications/harbormaster/capability/HarbormasterBuildPlanDefaultEditCapability.php',
'HarbormasterBuildPlanDefaultViewCapability' => 'applications/harbormaster/capability/HarbormasterBuildPlanDefaultViewCapability.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildPlanEditor' => 'applications/harbormaster/editor/HarbormasterBuildPlanEditor.php',
'HarbormasterBuildPlanPHIDType' => 'applications/harbormaster/phid/HarbormasterBuildPlanPHIDType.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildPlanQuery' => 'applications/harbormaster/query/HarbormasterBuildPlanQuery.php',
'HarbormasterBuildPlanSearchEngine' => 'applications/harbormaster/query/HarbormasterBuildPlanSearchEngine.php',
'HarbormasterBuildPlanTransaction' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/configuration/HarbormasterBuildPlanTransaction.php',
'HarbormasterBuildPlanTransactionQuery' => 'applications/harbormaster/query/HarbormasterBuildPlanTransactionQuery.php',
'HarbormasterBuildQuery' => 'applications/harbormaster/query/HarbormasterBuildQuery.php',
'HarbormasterBuildRequest' => 'applications/harbormaster/engine/HarbormasterBuildRequest.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildStep' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/configuration/HarbormasterBuildStep.php',
'HarbormasterBuildStepCoreCustomField' => 'applications/harbormaster/customfield/HarbormasterBuildStepCoreCustomField.php',
'HarbormasterBuildStepCustomField' => 'applications/harbormaster/customfield/HarbormasterBuildStepCustomField.php',
'HarbormasterBuildStepEditor' => 'applications/harbormaster/editor/HarbormasterBuildStepEditor.php',
'HarbormasterBuildStepGroup' => 'applications/harbormaster/stepgroup/HarbormasterBuildStepGroup.php',
'HarbormasterBuildStepImplementation' => 'applications/harbormaster/step/HarbormasterBuildStepImplementation.php',
'HarbormasterBuildStepImplementationTestCase' => 'applications/harbormaster/step/__tests__/HarbormasterBuildStepImplementationTestCase.php',
'HarbormasterBuildStepPHIDType' => 'applications/harbormaster/phid/HarbormasterBuildStepPHIDType.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildStepQuery' => 'applications/harbormaster/query/HarbormasterBuildStepQuery.php',
'HarbormasterBuildStepTransaction' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/configuration/HarbormasterBuildStepTransaction.php',
'HarbormasterBuildStepTransactionQuery' => 'applications/harbormaster/query/HarbormasterBuildStepTransactionQuery.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildTarget' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/build/HarbormasterBuildTarget.php',
'HarbormasterBuildTargetPHIDType' => 'applications/harbormaster/phid/HarbormasterBuildTargetPHIDType.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildTargetQuery' => 'applications/harbormaster/query/HarbormasterBuildTargetQuery.php',
'HarbormasterBuildTransaction' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/HarbormasterBuildTransaction.php',
'HarbormasterBuildTransactionEditor' => 'applications/harbormaster/editor/HarbormasterBuildTransactionEditor.php',
'HarbormasterBuildTransactionQuery' => 'applications/harbormaster/query/HarbormasterBuildTransactionQuery.php',
'HarbormasterBuildUnitMessage' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/build/HarbormasterBuildUnitMessage.php',
'HarbormasterBuildViewController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterBuildViewController.php',
'HarbormasterBuildWorker' => 'applications/harbormaster/worker/HarbormasterBuildWorker.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildable' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/HarbormasterBuildable.php',
'HarbormasterBuildableActionController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterBuildableActionController.php',
'HarbormasterBuildableAdapterInterface' => 'applications/harbormaster/herald/HarbormasterBuildableAdapterInterface.php',
'HarbormasterBuildableInterface' => 'applications/harbormaster/interface/HarbormasterBuildableInterface.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildableListController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterBuildableListController.php',
'HarbormasterBuildablePHIDType' => 'applications/harbormaster/phid/HarbormasterBuildablePHIDType.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildableQuery' => 'applications/harbormaster/query/HarbormasterBuildableQuery.php',
'HarbormasterBuildableSearchEngine' => 'applications/harbormaster/query/HarbormasterBuildableSearchEngine.php',
'HarbormasterBuildableTransaction' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/HarbormasterBuildableTransaction.php',
'HarbormasterBuildableTransactionEditor' => 'applications/harbormaster/editor/HarbormasterBuildableTransactionEditor.php',
'HarbormasterBuildableTransactionQuery' => 'applications/harbormaster/query/HarbormasterBuildableTransactionQuery.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildableViewController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterBuildableViewController.php',
'HarbormasterBuiltinBuildStepGroup' => 'applications/harbormaster/stepgroup/HarbormasterBuiltinBuildStepGroup.php',
'HarbormasterCommandBuildStepImplementation' => 'applications/harbormaster/step/HarbormasterCommandBuildStepImplementation.php',
'HarbormasterConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/harbormaster/conduit/HarbormasterConduitAPIMethod.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterController.php',
Add `harbormaster.createartifact` Summary: Ref T8659. In the general case, this eventually allows build processes to do things like: - Upload build results (like a ".app" or ".exe" or other binary). - Pass complex results between build steps (e.g., build step A does something hard and build step B uses it to do something else). Today, we're a long way away from having the infrastructure for that. However, it is useful to let third party build processes (like Jenkins) upload URIs that link back to the external build results. This adds `harbormaster.createartifact` so they can do that. The only useful thing to do with this method today is have your Jenkins build do this: params = array( "uri": "https://jenkins.mycompany.com/build/23923/details/", "name": "View Build Results in Jenkins", "ui.external": true, ); harbormaster.createartifact(target, 'uri', params); Then (after the next diff) we'll show a link in Differential and a prominent link in Harbormaster. I didn't actually do the UI stuff in this diff since it's already pretty big. This change moves a lot of code around, too: - Adds PHIDs to artifacts. - It modularizes build artifact types (currently "file", "host" and "URI"). - It formalizes build artifact parameters and construction: - This lets me generate usable documentation about how to create artifacts. - This prevents users from doing dangerous or policy-violating things. - It does some other general modernization. Test Plan: {F715633} {F715634} Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T8659 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13900
2015-08-15 16:28:56 +02:00
'HarbormasterCreateArtifactConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/harbormaster/conduit/HarbormasterCreateArtifactConduitAPIMethod.php',
'HarbormasterCreatePlansCapability' => 'applications/harbormaster/capability/HarbormasterCreatePlansCapability.php',
'HarbormasterDAO' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/HarbormasterDAO.php',
'HarbormasterDrydockBuildStepGroup' => 'applications/harbormaster/stepgroup/HarbormasterDrydockBuildStepGroup.php',
'HarbormasterDrydockCommandBuildStepImplementation' => 'applications/harbormaster/step/HarbormasterDrydockCommandBuildStepImplementation.php',
'HarbormasterDrydockLeaseArtifact' => 'applications/harbormaster/artifact/HarbormasterDrydockLeaseArtifact.php',
'HarbormasterExecFuture' => 'applications/harbormaster/future/HarbormasterExecFuture.php',
'HarbormasterExternalBuildStepGroup' => 'applications/harbormaster/stepgroup/HarbormasterExternalBuildStepGroup.php',
Add `harbormaster.createartifact` Summary: Ref T8659. In the general case, this eventually allows build processes to do things like: - Upload build results (like a ".app" or ".exe" or other binary). - Pass complex results between build steps (e.g., build step A does something hard and build step B uses it to do something else). Today, we're a long way away from having the infrastructure for that. However, it is useful to let third party build processes (like Jenkins) upload URIs that link back to the external build results. This adds `harbormaster.createartifact` so they can do that. The only useful thing to do with this method today is have your Jenkins build do this: params = array( "uri": "https://jenkins.mycompany.com/build/23923/details/", "name": "View Build Results in Jenkins", "ui.external": true, ); harbormaster.createartifact(target, 'uri', params); Then (after the next diff) we'll show a link in Differential and a prominent link in Harbormaster. I didn't actually do the UI stuff in this diff since it's already pretty big. This change moves a lot of code around, too: - Adds PHIDs to artifacts. - It modularizes build artifact types (currently "file", "host" and "URI"). - It formalizes build artifact parameters and construction: - This lets me generate usable documentation about how to create artifacts. - This prevents users from doing dangerous or policy-violating things. - It does some other general modernization. Test Plan: {F715633} {F715634} Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T8659 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13900
2015-08-15 16:28:56 +02:00
'HarbormasterFileArtifact' => 'applications/harbormaster/artifact/HarbormasterFileArtifact.php',
'HarbormasterHTTPRequestBuildStepImplementation' => 'applications/harbormaster/step/HarbormasterHTTPRequestBuildStepImplementation.php',
Add `harbormaster.createartifact` Summary: Ref T8659. In the general case, this eventually allows build processes to do things like: - Upload build results (like a ".app" or ".exe" or other binary). - Pass complex results between build steps (e.g., build step A does something hard and build step B uses it to do something else). Today, we're a long way away from having the infrastructure for that. However, it is useful to let third party build processes (like Jenkins) upload URIs that link back to the external build results. This adds `harbormaster.createartifact` so they can do that. The only useful thing to do with this method today is have your Jenkins build do this: params = array( "uri": "https://jenkins.mycompany.com/build/23923/details/", "name": "View Build Results in Jenkins", "ui.external": true, ); harbormaster.createartifact(target, 'uri', params); Then (after the next diff) we'll show a link in Differential and a prominent link in Harbormaster. I didn't actually do the UI stuff in this diff since it's already pretty big. This change moves a lot of code around, too: - Adds PHIDs to artifacts. - It modularizes build artifact types (currently "file", "host" and "URI"). - It formalizes build artifact parameters and construction: - This lets me generate usable documentation about how to create artifacts. - This prevents users from doing dangerous or policy-violating things. - It does some other general modernization. Test Plan: {F715633} {F715634} Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T8659 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13900
2015-08-15 16:28:56 +02:00
'HarbormasterHostArtifact' => 'applications/harbormaster/artifact/HarbormasterHostArtifact.php',
'HarbormasterLeaseHostBuildStepImplementation' => 'applications/harbormaster/step/HarbormasterLeaseHostBuildStepImplementation.php',
'HarbormasterLeaseWorkingCopyBuildStepImplementation' => 'applications/harbormaster/step/HarbormasterLeaseWorkingCopyBuildStepImplementation.php',
'HarbormasterLintMessagesController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterLintMessagesController.php',
'HarbormasterLintPropertyView' => 'applications/harbormaster/view/HarbormasterLintPropertyView.php',
'HarbormasterManagementBuildWorkflow' => 'applications/harbormaster/management/HarbormasterManagementBuildWorkflow.php',
'HarbormasterManagementUpdateWorkflow' => 'applications/harbormaster/management/HarbormasterManagementUpdateWorkflow.php',
'HarbormasterManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/harbormaster/management/HarbormasterManagementWorkflow.php',
'HarbormasterMessageType' => 'applications/harbormaster/engine/HarbormasterMessageType.php',
'HarbormasterObject' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/HarbormasterObject.php',
'HarbormasterOtherBuildStepGroup' => 'applications/harbormaster/stepgroup/HarbormasterOtherBuildStepGroup.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterPlanController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterPlanController.php',
'HarbormasterPlanDisableController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterPlanDisableController.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterPlanEditController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterPlanEditController.php',
'HarbormasterPlanListController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterPlanListController.php',
'HarbormasterPlanRunController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterPlanRunController.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterPlanViewController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterPlanViewController.php',
'HarbormasterPrototypeBuildStepGroup' => 'applications/harbormaster/stepgroup/HarbormasterPrototypeBuildStepGroup.php',
'HarbormasterPublishFragmentBuildStepImplementation' => 'applications/harbormaster/step/HarbormasterPublishFragmentBuildStepImplementation.php',
Add "Autoplans" to Harbormaster Summary: Ref T8095. Two general problems: - I want Harbormaster to own all lint and unit test results. - I don't want users to have to configure anything for `arc` to keep working automatically. These are in conflict because generic lint/unit test ownership in Harbormaster requires that build targets exist which we can attach build results to. However, we can't currently create build targets on demand: Harbormaster assumes it is responsible for creating targets, then running code or making third-party service calls to actually run the builds. I considered two broad approaches to let `arc` push results into Harbormaster without requiring administrators to configure some kind of "arc results" build plan: # Add magic target PHIDs like `PHID-MAGIC-this-is-really-arc-unit`. # Add new code to build real targets with real PHIDs. (1) is probably a bit less work to get off the ground, but I think it's worse overall and very likely to create more problems in the long run. I particularly worry that it will lead to a small amount of special casing in a very large number of places, which seems more fragile. (2) is more work upfront but I think does a better job of putting all the special casing in one place that we can, e.g., more reasonably unit test, and letting the rest of the code rarely/never care about this case since it's just dealing with normal plans/steps/targets as far as it can tell. This diff introduces "autoplans", which are source templates for plans/steps. This let us "push" these targets into Harbormaster. Hypthetically, any process "like" arc can use autoplans to upload test/lint/etc results. In practice, probably only `arc` will ever use this, but I think it's still quite a bit cleaner than the alternative despite all the generality. Workflow is basically: - `arc` creates a diff. - `arc` calls `harbormaster.queryautotargets`, passing the diff PHID and saying "I have some lint and unit results I want to stick on this thing". - Harbormaster builds the plan, steps, and targets (if any of them don't already exist), and hands back the target PHIDs so `arc` has a completely standard-looking place to put results. - `arc` uploads the test results to the right targets, as though Harbormaster had asked it to run unit/lint in the first place. (This doesn't actually do any of that yet, just sets things up.) I'll maybe doc turn that ^^^^^^ into a doc for posterity since I think it's hard to guess what an "autotarget" is, but I'm going to grab some lunch first. Test Plan: - Added unit tests to make sure we can build these things properly. - Used `harbormaster.queryautotargets` to build autotargets for a bunch of diffs. - Verified targets come up in "waiting for message" state. - Verified plans and steps are not editable. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T8095 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13345
2015-06-21 18:04:21 +02:00
'HarbormasterQueryAutotargetsConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/harbormaster/conduit/HarbormasterQueryAutotargetsConduitAPIMethod.php',
'HarbormasterQueryBuildablesConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/harbormaster/conduit/HarbormasterQueryBuildablesConduitAPIMethod.php',
'HarbormasterQueryBuildsConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/harbormaster/conduit/HarbormasterQueryBuildsConduitAPIMethod.php',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterRemarkupRule' => 'applications/harbormaster/remarkup/HarbormasterRemarkupRule.php',
'HarbormasterRunBuildPlansHeraldAction' => 'applications/harbormaster/herald/HarbormasterRunBuildPlansHeraldAction.php',
'HarbormasterSchemaSpec' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/HarbormasterSchemaSpec.php',
'HarbormasterScratchTable' => 'applications/harbormaster/storage/HarbormasterScratchTable.php',
'HarbormasterSendMessageConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/harbormaster/conduit/HarbormasterSendMessageConduitAPIMethod.php',
'HarbormasterSleepBuildStepImplementation' => 'applications/harbormaster/step/HarbormasterSleepBuildStepImplementation.php',
'HarbormasterStepAddController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterStepAddController.php',
'HarbormasterStepDeleteController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterStepDeleteController.php',
'HarbormasterStepEditController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterStepEditController.php',
'HarbormasterStepViewController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterStepViewController.php',
Add "Autoplans" to Harbormaster Summary: Ref T8095. Two general problems: - I want Harbormaster to own all lint and unit test results. - I don't want users to have to configure anything for `arc` to keep working automatically. These are in conflict because generic lint/unit test ownership in Harbormaster requires that build targets exist which we can attach build results to. However, we can't currently create build targets on demand: Harbormaster assumes it is responsible for creating targets, then running code or making third-party service calls to actually run the builds. I considered two broad approaches to let `arc` push results into Harbormaster without requiring administrators to configure some kind of "arc results" build plan: # Add magic target PHIDs like `PHID-MAGIC-this-is-really-arc-unit`. # Add new code to build real targets with real PHIDs. (1) is probably a bit less work to get off the ground, but I think it's worse overall and very likely to create more problems in the long run. I particularly worry that it will lead to a small amount of special casing in a very large number of places, which seems more fragile. (2) is more work upfront but I think does a better job of putting all the special casing in one place that we can, e.g., more reasonably unit test, and letting the rest of the code rarely/never care about this case since it's just dealing with normal plans/steps/targets as far as it can tell. This diff introduces "autoplans", which are source templates for plans/steps. This let us "push" these targets into Harbormaster. Hypthetically, any process "like" arc can use autoplans to upload test/lint/etc results. In practice, probably only `arc` will ever use this, but I think it's still quite a bit cleaner than the alternative despite all the generality. Workflow is basically: - `arc` creates a diff. - `arc` calls `harbormaster.queryautotargets`, passing the diff PHID and saying "I have some lint and unit results I want to stick on this thing". - Harbormaster builds the plan, steps, and targets (if any of them don't already exist), and hands back the target PHIDs so `arc` has a completely standard-looking place to put results. - `arc` uploads the test results to the right targets, as though Harbormaster had asked it to run unit/lint in the first place. (This doesn't actually do any of that yet, just sets things up.) I'll maybe doc turn that ^^^^^^ into a doc for posterity since I think it's hard to guess what an "autotarget" is, but I'm going to grab some lunch first. Test Plan: - Added unit tests to make sure we can build these things properly. - Used `harbormaster.queryautotargets` to build autotargets for a bunch of diffs. - Verified targets come up in "waiting for message" state. - Verified plans and steps are not editable. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T8095 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13345
2015-06-21 18:04:21 +02:00
'HarbormasterTargetEngine' => 'applications/harbormaster/engine/HarbormasterTargetEngine.php',
'HarbormasterTargetWorker' => 'applications/harbormaster/worker/HarbormasterTargetWorker.php',
'HarbormasterTestBuildStepGroup' => 'applications/harbormaster/stepgroup/HarbormasterTestBuildStepGroup.php',
'HarbormasterThrowExceptionBuildStep' => 'applications/harbormaster/step/HarbormasterThrowExceptionBuildStep.php',
'HarbormasterUIEventListener' => 'applications/harbormaster/event/HarbormasterUIEventListener.php',
Add `harbormaster.createartifact` Summary: Ref T8659. In the general case, this eventually allows build processes to do things like: - Upload build results (like a ".app" or ".exe" or other binary). - Pass complex results between build steps (e.g., build step A does something hard and build step B uses it to do something else). Today, we're a long way away from having the infrastructure for that. However, it is useful to let third party build processes (like Jenkins) upload URIs that link back to the external build results. This adds `harbormaster.createartifact` so they can do that. The only useful thing to do with this method today is have your Jenkins build do this: params = array( "uri": "https://jenkins.mycompany.com/build/23923/details/", "name": "View Build Results in Jenkins", "ui.external": true, ); harbormaster.createartifact(target, 'uri', params); Then (after the next diff) we'll show a link in Differential and a prominent link in Harbormaster. I didn't actually do the UI stuff in this diff since it's already pretty big. This change moves a lot of code around, too: - Adds PHIDs to artifacts. - It modularizes build artifact types (currently "file", "host" and "URI"). - It formalizes build artifact parameters and construction: - This lets me generate usable documentation about how to create artifacts. - This prevents users from doing dangerous or policy-violating things. - It does some other general modernization. Test Plan: {F715633} {F715634} Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T8659 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13900
2015-08-15 16:28:56 +02:00
'HarbormasterURIArtifact' => 'applications/harbormaster/artifact/HarbormasterURIArtifact.php',
'HarbormasterUnitMessagesController' => 'applications/harbormaster/controller/HarbormasterUnitMessagesController.php',
'HarbormasterUnitPropertyView' => 'applications/harbormaster/view/HarbormasterUnitPropertyView.php',
'HarbormasterUploadArtifactBuildStepImplementation' => 'applications/harbormaster/step/HarbormasterUploadArtifactBuildStepImplementation.php',
'HarbormasterWaitForPreviousBuildStepImplementation' => 'applications/harbormaster/step/HarbormasterWaitForPreviousBuildStepImplementation.php',
'HarbormasterWorker' => 'applications/harbormaster/worker/HarbormasterWorker.php',
'HarbormasterWorkingCopyArtifact' => 'applications/harbormaster/artifact/HarbormasterWorkingCopyArtifact.php',
'HeraldAction' => 'applications/herald/action/HeraldAction.php',
'HeraldActionGroup' => 'applications/herald/action/HeraldActionGroup.php',
'HeraldActionRecord' => 'applications/herald/storage/HeraldActionRecord.php',
'HeraldAdapter' => 'applications/herald/adapter/HeraldAdapter.php',
'HeraldAlwaysField' => 'applications/herald/field/HeraldAlwaysField.php',
'HeraldAnotherRuleField' => 'applications/herald/field/HeraldAnotherRuleField.php',
'HeraldApplicationActionGroup' => 'applications/herald/action/HeraldApplicationActionGroup.php',
'HeraldApplyTranscript' => 'applications/herald/storage/transcript/HeraldApplyTranscript.php',
'HeraldBasicFieldGroup' => 'applications/herald/field/HeraldBasicFieldGroup.php',
'HeraldCommitAdapter' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/HeraldCommitAdapter.php',
'HeraldCondition' => 'applications/herald/storage/HeraldCondition.php',
'HeraldConditionTranscript' => 'applications/herald/storage/transcript/HeraldConditionTranscript.php',
'HeraldContentSourceField' => 'applications/herald/field/HeraldContentSourceField.php',
'HeraldController' => 'applications/herald/controller/HeraldController.php',
'HeraldDAO' => 'applications/herald/storage/HeraldDAO.php',
'HeraldDifferentialAdapter' => 'applications/differential/herald/HeraldDifferentialAdapter.php',
'HeraldDifferentialDiffAdapter' => 'applications/differential/herald/HeraldDifferentialDiffAdapter.php',
'HeraldDifferentialRevisionAdapter' => 'applications/differential/herald/HeraldDifferentialRevisionAdapter.php',
'HeraldDisableController' => 'applications/herald/controller/HeraldDisableController.php',
'HeraldDoNothingAction' => 'applications/herald/action/HeraldDoNothingAction.php',
'HeraldEditFieldGroup' => 'applications/herald/field/HeraldEditFieldGroup.php',
'HeraldEffect' => 'applications/herald/engine/HeraldEffect.php',
'HeraldEmptyFieldValue' => 'applications/herald/value/HeraldEmptyFieldValue.php',
'HeraldEngine' => 'applications/herald/engine/HeraldEngine.php',
'HeraldField' => 'applications/herald/field/HeraldField.php',
'HeraldFieldGroup' => 'applications/herald/field/HeraldFieldGroup.php',
'HeraldFieldTestCase' => 'applications/herald/field/__tests__/HeraldFieldTestCase.php',
'HeraldFieldValue' => 'applications/herald/value/HeraldFieldValue.php',
'HeraldGroup' => 'applications/herald/group/HeraldGroup.php',
'HeraldInvalidActionException' => 'applications/herald/engine/exception/HeraldInvalidActionException.php',
'HeraldInvalidConditionException' => 'applications/herald/engine/exception/HeraldInvalidConditionException.php',
'HeraldManageGlobalRulesCapability' => 'applications/herald/capability/HeraldManageGlobalRulesCapability.php',
'HeraldManiphestTaskAdapter' => 'applications/maniphest/herald/HeraldManiphestTaskAdapter.php',
'HeraldNewController' => 'applications/herald/controller/HeraldNewController.php',
'HeraldNewObjectField' => 'applications/herald/field/HeraldNewObjectField.php',
'HeraldNotifyActionGroup' => 'applications/herald/action/HeraldNotifyActionGroup.php',
'HeraldObjectTranscript' => 'applications/herald/storage/transcript/HeraldObjectTranscript.php',
'HeraldPholioMockAdapter' => 'applications/pholio/herald/HeraldPholioMockAdapter.php',
'HeraldPonderQuestionAdapter' => 'applications/ponder/herald/HeraldPonderQuestionAdapter.php',
'HeraldPreCommitAdapter' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/HeraldPreCommitAdapter.php',
'HeraldPreCommitContentAdapter' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/HeraldPreCommitContentAdapter.php',
Add Herald support for blocking ref changes Summary: Ref T4195. Allows users to write Herald rules which block ref changes. For example, you can write a rule like `alincoln can not create branches`, or `no one can push to the branch "frozen"`. Test Plan: This covers a lot of ground. I created and pushed a bunch of rules, then looked at transcripts, in general. Here are some bits in detail: Here's a hook-based reject message: >>> orbital ~/repos/POEMS $ git push Counting objects: 5, done. Delta compression using up to 8 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done. Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 274 bytes, done. Total 3 (delta 2), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: +---------------------------------------------------------------+ remote: | * * * PUSH REJECTED BY EVIL DRAGON BUREAUCRATS * * * | remote: +---------------------------------------------------------------+ remote: \ remote: \ ^ /^ remote: \ / \ // \ remote: \ |\___/| / \// .\ remote: \ /V V \__ / // | \ \ *----* remote: / / \/_/ // | \ \ \ | remote: @___@` \/_ // | \ \ \/\ \ remote: 0/0/| \/_ // | \ \ \ \ remote: 0/0/0/0/| \/// | \ \ | | remote: 0/0/0/0/0/_|_ / ( // | \ _\ | / remote: 0/0/0/0/0/0/`/,_ _ _/ ) ; -. | _ _\.-~ / / remote: ,-} _ *-.|.-~-. .~ ~ remote: \ \__/ `/\ / ~-. _ .-~ / remote: \____(Oo) *. } { / remote: ( (--) .----~-.\ \-` .~ remote: //__\\ \ DENIED! ///.----..< \ _ -~ remote: // \\ ///-._ _ _ _ _ _ _{^ - - - - ~ remote: remote: remote: This commit was rejected by Herald pre-commit rule H24. remote: Rule: No Branches Called Blarp remote: Reason: "blarp" is a bad branch name remote: To ssh://dweller@localhost/diffusion/POEMS/ ! [remote rejected] blarp -> blarp (pre-receive hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://dweller@localhost/diffusion/POEMS/' Here's a transcript, showing that all the field values populate sensibly: {F90453} Here's a rule: {F90454} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T4195 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7782
2013-12-18 00:23:55 +01:00
'HeraldPreCommitRefAdapter' => 'applications/diffusion/herald/HeraldPreCommitRefAdapter.php',
'HeraldPreventActionGroup' => 'applications/herald/action/HeraldPreventActionGroup.php',
'HeraldProjectsField' => 'applications/project/herald/HeraldProjectsField.php',
'HeraldRecursiveConditionsException' => 'applications/herald/engine/exception/HeraldRecursiveConditionsException.php',
'HeraldRelatedFieldGroup' => 'applications/herald/field/HeraldRelatedFieldGroup.php',
'HeraldRemarkupRule' => 'applications/herald/remarkup/HeraldRemarkupRule.php',
'HeraldRepetitionPolicyConfig' => 'applications/herald/config/HeraldRepetitionPolicyConfig.php',
'HeraldRule' => 'applications/herald/storage/HeraldRule.php',
'HeraldRuleController' => 'applications/herald/controller/HeraldRuleController.php',
'HeraldRuleEditor' => 'applications/herald/editor/HeraldRuleEditor.php',
'HeraldRuleListController' => 'applications/herald/controller/HeraldRuleListController.php',
'HeraldRulePHIDType' => 'applications/herald/phid/HeraldRulePHIDType.php',
'HeraldRuleQuery' => 'applications/herald/query/HeraldRuleQuery.php',
'HeraldRuleSearchEngine' => 'applications/herald/query/HeraldRuleSearchEngine.php',
'HeraldRuleTestCase' => 'applications/herald/storage/__tests__/HeraldRuleTestCase.php',
'HeraldRuleTransaction' => 'applications/herald/storage/HeraldRuleTransaction.php',
'HeraldRuleTransactionComment' => 'applications/herald/storage/HeraldRuleTransactionComment.php',
'HeraldRuleTranscript' => 'applications/herald/storage/transcript/HeraldRuleTranscript.php',
'HeraldRuleTypeConfig' => 'applications/herald/config/HeraldRuleTypeConfig.php',
'HeraldRuleViewController' => 'applications/herald/controller/HeraldRuleViewController.php',
'HeraldSchemaSpec' => 'applications/herald/storage/HeraldSchemaSpec.php',
'HeraldSelectFieldValue' => 'applications/herald/value/HeraldSelectFieldValue.php',
'HeraldSpaceField' => 'applications/spaces/herald/HeraldSpaceField.php',
'HeraldSubscribersField' => 'applications/subscriptions/herald/HeraldSubscribersField.php',
'HeraldSupportActionGroup' => 'applications/herald/action/HeraldSupportActionGroup.php',
'HeraldSupportFieldGroup' => 'applications/herald/field/HeraldSupportFieldGroup.php',
'HeraldTestConsoleController' => 'applications/herald/controller/HeraldTestConsoleController.php',
'HeraldTextFieldValue' => 'applications/herald/value/HeraldTextFieldValue.php',
'HeraldTokenizerFieldValue' => 'applications/herald/value/HeraldTokenizerFieldValue.php',
'HeraldTransactionQuery' => 'applications/herald/query/HeraldTransactionQuery.php',
'HeraldTranscript' => 'applications/herald/storage/transcript/HeraldTranscript.php',
'HeraldTranscriptController' => 'applications/herald/controller/HeraldTranscriptController.php',
'HeraldTranscriptGarbageCollector' => 'applications/herald/garbagecollector/HeraldTranscriptGarbageCollector.php',
'HeraldTranscriptListController' => 'applications/herald/controller/HeraldTranscriptListController.php',
'HeraldTranscriptQuery' => 'applications/herald/query/HeraldTranscriptQuery.php',
'HeraldTranscriptSearchEngine' => 'applications/herald/query/HeraldTranscriptSearchEngine.php',
'HeraldTranscriptTestCase' => 'applications/herald/storage/__tests__/HeraldTranscriptTestCase.php',
'HeraldUtilityActionGroup' => 'applications/herald/action/HeraldUtilityActionGroup.php',
'Javelin' => 'infrastructure/javelin/Javelin.php',
'JavelinReactorUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/JavelinReactorUIExample.php',
'JavelinUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/JavelinUIExample.php',
'JavelinViewExampleServerView' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/JavelinViewExampleServerView.php',
'JavelinViewUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/JavelinViewUIExample.php',
'LegalpadController' => 'applications/legalpad/controller/LegalpadController.php',
'LegalpadCreateDocumentsCapability' => 'applications/legalpad/capability/LegalpadCreateDocumentsCapability.php',
'LegalpadDAO' => 'applications/legalpad/storage/LegalpadDAO.php',
'LegalpadDefaultEditCapability' => 'applications/legalpad/capability/LegalpadDefaultEditCapability.php',
'LegalpadDefaultViewCapability' => 'applications/legalpad/capability/LegalpadDefaultViewCapability.php',
'LegalpadDocument' => 'applications/legalpad/storage/LegalpadDocument.php',
'LegalpadDocumentBody' => 'applications/legalpad/storage/LegalpadDocumentBody.php',
'LegalpadDocumentCommentController' => 'applications/legalpad/controller/LegalpadDocumentCommentController.php',
'LegalpadDocumentDatasource' => 'applications/legalpad/typeahead/LegalpadDocumentDatasource.php',
'LegalpadDocumentDoneController' => 'applications/legalpad/controller/LegalpadDocumentDoneController.php',
'LegalpadDocumentEditController' => 'applications/legalpad/controller/LegalpadDocumentEditController.php',
'LegalpadDocumentEditor' => 'applications/legalpad/editor/LegalpadDocumentEditor.php',
'LegalpadDocumentListController' => 'applications/legalpad/controller/LegalpadDocumentListController.php',
'LegalpadDocumentManageController' => 'applications/legalpad/controller/LegalpadDocumentManageController.php',
'LegalpadDocumentQuery' => 'applications/legalpad/query/LegalpadDocumentQuery.php',
'LegalpadDocumentRemarkupRule' => 'applications/legalpad/remarkup/LegalpadDocumentRemarkupRule.php',
'LegalpadDocumentSearchEngine' => 'applications/legalpad/query/LegalpadDocumentSearchEngine.php',
'LegalpadDocumentSignController' => 'applications/legalpad/controller/LegalpadDocumentSignController.php',
'LegalpadDocumentSignature' => 'applications/legalpad/storage/LegalpadDocumentSignature.php',
'LegalpadDocumentSignatureAddController' => 'applications/legalpad/controller/LegalpadDocumentSignatureAddController.php',
'LegalpadDocumentSignatureListController' => 'applications/legalpad/controller/LegalpadDocumentSignatureListController.php',
'LegalpadDocumentSignatureQuery' => 'applications/legalpad/query/LegalpadDocumentSignatureQuery.php',
'LegalpadDocumentSignatureSearchEngine' => 'applications/legalpad/query/LegalpadDocumentSignatureSearchEngine.php',
'LegalpadDocumentSignatureVerificationController' => 'applications/legalpad/controller/LegalpadDocumentSignatureVerificationController.php',
'LegalpadDocumentSignatureViewController' => 'applications/legalpad/controller/LegalpadDocumentSignatureViewController.php',
'LegalpadMailReceiver' => 'applications/legalpad/mail/LegalpadMailReceiver.php',
'LegalpadObjectNeedsSignatureEdgeType' => 'applications/legalpad/edge/LegalpadObjectNeedsSignatureEdgeType.php',
'LegalpadReplyHandler' => 'applications/legalpad/mail/LegalpadReplyHandler.php',
'LegalpadRequireSignatureHeraldAction' => 'applications/legalpad/herald/LegalpadRequireSignatureHeraldAction.php',
'LegalpadSchemaSpec' => 'applications/legalpad/storage/LegalpadSchemaSpec.php',
'LegalpadSignatureNeededByObjectEdgeType' => 'applications/legalpad/edge/LegalpadSignatureNeededByObjectEdgeType.php',
'LegalpadTransaction' => 'applications/legalpad/storage/LegalpadTransaction.php',
'LegalpadTransactionComment' => 'applications/legalpad/storage/LegalpadTransactionComment.php',
'LegalpadTransactionQuery' => 'applications/legalpad/query/LegalpadTransactionQuery.php',
'LegalpadTransactionView' => 'applications/legalpad/view/LegalpadTransactionView.php',
'LiskChunkTestCase' => 'infrastructure/storage/lisk/__tests__/LiskChunkTestCase.php',
'LiskDAO' => 'infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php',
'LiskDAOSet' => 'infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAOSet.php',
'LiskDAOTestCase' => 'infrastructure/storage/lisk/__tests__/LiskDAOTestCase.php',
'LiskEphemeralObjectException' => 'infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskEphemeralObjectException.php',
'LiskFixtureTestCase' => 'infrastructure/storage/lisk/__tests__/LiskFixtureTestCase.php',
'LiskIsolationTestCase' => 'infrastructure/storage/lisk/__tests__/LiskIsolationTestCase.php',
'LiskIsolationTestDAO' => 'infrastructure/storage/lisk/__tests__/LiskIsolationTestDAO.php',
'LiskIsolationTestDAOException' => 'infrastructure/storage/lisk/__tests__/LiskIsolationTestDAOException.php',
'LiskMigrationIterator' => 'infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskMigrationIterator.php',
'LiskRawMigrationIterator' => 'infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskRawMigrationIterator.php',
'MacroConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/macro/conduit/MacroConduitAPIMethod.php',
'MacroCreateMemeConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/macro/conduit/MacroCreateMemeConduitAPIMethod.php',
'MacroQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/macro/conduit/MacroQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ManiphestAssignEmailCommand' => 'applications/maniphest/command/ManiphestAssignEmailCommand.php',
'ManiphestAssigneeDatasource' => 'applications/maniphest/typeahead/ManiphestAssigneeDatasource.php',
'ManiphestBatchEditController' => 'applications/maniphest/controller/ManiphestBatchEditController.php',
'ManiphestBulkEditCapability' => 'applications/maniphest/capability/ManiphestBulkEditCapability.php',
'ManiphestClaimEmailCommand' => 'applications/maniphest/command/ManiphestClaimEmailCommand.php',
'ManiphestCloseEmailCommand' => 'applications/maniphest/command/ManiphestCloseEmailCommand.php',
'ManiphestConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/maniphest/conduit/ManiphestConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ManiphestConfiguredCustomField' => 'applications/maniphest/field/ManiphestConfiguredCustomField.php',
'ManiphestConstants' => 'applications/maniphest/constants/ManiphestConstants.php',
'ManiphestController' => 'applications/maniphest/controller/ManiphestController.php',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'ManiphestCreateMailReceiver' => 'applications/maniphest/mail/ManiphestCreateMailReceiver.php',
'ManiphestCreateTaskConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/maniphest/conduit/ManiphestCreateTaskConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ManiphestCustomField' => 'applications/maniphest/field/ManiphestCustomField.php',
'ManiphestCustomFieldNumericIndex' => 'applications/maniphest/storage/ManiphestCustomFieldNumericIndex.php',
'ManiphestCustomFieldStatusParser' => 'applications/maniphest/field/parser/ManiphestCustomFieldStatusParser.php',
'ManiphestCustomFieldStatusParserTestCase' => 'applications/maniphest/field/parser/__tests__/ManiphestCustomFieldStatusParserTestCase.php',
'ManiphestCustomFieldStorage' => 'applications/maniphest/storage/ManiphestCustomFieldStorage.php',
'ManiphestCustomFieldStringIndex' => 'applications/maniphest/storage/ManiphestCustomFieldStringIndex.php',
'ManiphestDAO' => 'applications/maniphest/storage/ManiphestDAO.php',
'ManiphestDefaultEditCapability' => 'applications/maniphest/capability/ManiphestDefaultEditCapability.php',
'ManiphestDefaultViewCapability' => 'applications/maniphest/capability/ManiphestDefaultViewCapability.php',
'ManiphestEditAssignCapability' => 'applications/maniphest/capability/ManiphestEditAssignCapability.php',
Rough in EditEngine for Maniphest Summary: Ref T9132. I'm going hold this until after the release cut since it isn't going to land completely smoothly, but I think I can prep it today/tomorrow and hopefully get it close enough to working to put in HEAD on Saturday after the push. This adds the basics: new EditEngine, new EditController, and new `maniphest.edit` API endpoint. I put the new stuff at `editpro/` for now until it works a little better. Some notes on stuff this is dropping/changing/not-working-yet: - Preview for the description. I'd rather solve this by putting a "Preview" button on every Remarkup area if we want to retain it. Particularly, it does not generalize to adding custom remarkup fields in its current form. See also T3967. - Per-field policies are no longer enforced. They were never truly enforced anyway (for example, any user who can edit a task has always been able to edit every field via Conduit or email actions or Herald, where Herald supports things), and only really served as a hint to users. I think we can obsolete this by having installs hide/lock these fields instead. This is a desirable outcome for me, since I don't like retaining these policies and the idea of truly enforcing them properly is worrisome. These were originally added for Uber as an onboarding sort of thing. I'll prepare users for this in greater detail in the documentation. - Couple of minor bugs with ordering / defaults / only-one-owner-allowed in this diff that I'll clean up in future diffs before this stuff lands. - I don't have a concrete plan on "Create Similar Task" / "Clone" yet (do you have thoughts? Is this worth trying to do in every application?). I'll probably just mostly mimic the current behavior. Test Plan: I'll vet this more thoroughly in followups, just banged around some tasks for now and created/edited via the API. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14659
2015-12-03 23:32:40 +01:00
'ManiphestEditConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/maniphest/conduit/ManiphestEditConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ManiphestEditEngine' => 'applications/maniphest/editor/ManiphestEditEngine.php',
'ManiphestEditPoliciesCapability' => 'applications/maniphest/capability/ManiphestEditPoliciesCapability.php',
'ManiphestEditPriorityCapability' => 'applications/maniphest/capability/ManiphestEditPriorityCapability.php',
'ManiphestEditProjectsCapability' => 'applications/maniphest/capability/ManiphestEditProjectsCapability.php',
'ManiphestEditStatusCapability' => 'applications/maniphest/capability/ManiphestEditStatusCapability.php',
'ManiphestEmailCommand' => 'applications/maniphest/command/ManiphestEmailCommand.php',
'ManiphestExcelDefaultFormat' => 'applications/maniphest/export/ManiphestExcelDefaultFormat.php',
'ManiphestExcelFormat' => 'applications/maniphest/export/ManiphestExcelFormat.php',
'ManiphestExcelFormatTestCase' => 'applications/maniphest/export/__tests__/ManiphestExcelFormatTestCase.php',
'ManiphestExportController' => 'applications/maniphest/controller/ManiphestExportController.php',
'ManiphestGetTaskTransactionsConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/maniphest/conduit/ManiphestGetTaskTransactionsConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ManiphestHovercardEventListener' => 'applications/maniphest/event/ManiphestHovercardEventListener.php',
'ManiphestInfoConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/maniphest/conduit/ManiphestInfoConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ManiphestNameIndex' => 'applications/maniphest/storage/ManiphestNameIndex.php',
'ManiphestNameIndexEventListener' => 'applications/maniphest/event/ManiphestNameIndexEventListener.php',
'ManiphestPriorityConfigOptionType' => 'applications/maniphest/config/ManiphestPriorityConfigOptionType.php',
'ManiphestPriorityEmailCommand' => 'applications/maniphest/command/ManiphestPriorityEmailCommand.php',
'ManiphestQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/maniphest/conduit/ManiphestQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ManiphestQueryStatusesConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/maniphest/conduit/ManiphestQueryStatusesConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ManiphestRemarkupRule' => 'applications/maniphest/remarkup/ManiphestRemarkupRule.php',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'ManiphestReplyHandler' => 'applications/maniphest/mail/ManiphestReplyHandler.php',
'ManiphestReportController' => 'applications/maniphest/controller/ManiphestReportController.php',
'ManiphestSchemaSpec' => 'applications/maniphest/storage/ManiphestSchemaSpec.php',
'ManiphestSearchConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/maniphest/conduit/ManiphestSearchConduitAPIMethod.php',
Improve Search architecture Summary: The search indexing API has several problems right now: - Always runs in-process. - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it. - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster. - Instead, make the API phid-oriented. - No uniform indexing API. - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird. - Instead, provide a uniform API. - No uniform CLI. - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers. - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing. - Not application-oriented. - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world. - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader. Test Plan: - `bin/search index` - Indexed one revision, one task. - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types. - Indexed `--all`. - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it. - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing. - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing. - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: 20after4, aran Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 23:21:31 +01:00
'ManiphestSearchIndexer' => 'applications/maniphest/search/ManiphestSearchIndexer.php',
'ManiphestStatusConfigOptionType' => 'applications/maniphest/config/ManiphestStatusConfigOptionType.php',
'ManiphestStatusEmailCommand' => 'applications/maniphest/command/ManiphestStatusEmailCommand.php',
'ManiphestSubpriorityController' => 'applications/maniphest/controller/ManiphestSubpriorityController.php',
'ManiphestTask' => 'applications/maniphest/storage/ManiphestTask.php',
'ManiphestTaskAssignHeraldAction' => 'applications/maniphest/herald/ManiphestTaskAssignHeraldAction.php',
'ManiphestTaskAssignOtherHeraldAction' => 'applications/maniphest/herald/ManiphestTaskAssignOtherHeraldAction.php',
'ManiphestTaskAssignSelfHeraldAction' => 'applications/maniphest/herald/ManiphestTaskAssignSelfHeraldAction.php',
'ManiphestTaskAssigneeHeraldField' => 'applications/maniphest/herald/ManiphestTaskAssigneeHeraldField.php',
'ManiphestTaskAuthorHeraldField' => 'applications/maniphest/herald/ManiphestTaskAuthorHeraldField.php',
'ManiphestTaskAuthorPolicyRule' => 'applications/maniphest/policyrule/ManiphestTaskAuthorPolicyRule.php',
'ManiphestTaskClosedStatusDatasource' => 'applications/maniphest/typeahead/ManiphestTaskClosedStatusDatasource.php',
'ManiphestTaskDependedOnByTaskEdgeType' => 'applications/maniphest/edge/ManiphestTaskDependedOnByTaskEdgeType.php',
'ManiphestTaskDependsOnTaskEdgeType' => 'applications/maniphest/edge/ManiphestTaskDependsOnTaskEdgeType.php',
'ManiphestTaskDescriptionHeraldField' => 'applications/maniphest/herald/ManiphestTaskDescriptionHeraldField.php',
'ManiphestTaskDetailController' => 'applications/maniphest/controller/ManiphestTaskDetailController.php',
'ManiphestTaskEditBulkJobType' => 'applications/maniphest/bulk/ManiphestTaskEditBulkJobType.php',
'ManiphestTaskEditController' => 'applications/maniphest/controller/ManiphestTaskEditController.php',
'ManiphestTaskHasCommitEdgeType' => 'applications/maniphest/edge/ManiphestTaskHasCommitEdgeType.php',
'ManiphestTaskHasMockEdgeType' => 'applications/maniphest/edge/ManiphestTaskHasMockEdgeType.php',
'ManiphestTaskHasRevisionEdgeType' => 'applications/maniphest/edge/ManiphestTaskHasRevisionEdgeType.php',
'ManiphestTaskHeraldField' => 'applications/maniphest/herald/ManiphestTaskHeraldField.php',
'ManiphestTaskHeraldFieldGroup' => 'applications/maniphest/herald/ManiphestTaskHeraldFieldGroup.php',
'ManiphestTaskListController' => 'applications/maniphest/controller/ManiphestTaskListController.php',
'ManiphestTaskListHTTPParameterType' => 'applications/maniphest/httpparametertype/ManiphestTaskListHTTPParameterType.php',
'ManiphestTaskListView' => 'applications/maniphest/view/ManiphestTaskListView.php',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'ManiphestTaskMailReceiver' => 'applications/maniphest/mail/ManiphestTaskMailReceiver.php',
'ManiphestTaskOpenStatusDatasource' => 'applications/maniphest/typeahead/ManiphestTaskOpenStatusDatasource.php',
'ManiphestTaskPHIDResolver' => 'applications/maniphest/httpparametertype/ManiphestTaskPHIDResolver.php',
'ManiphestTaskPHIDType' => 'applications/maniphest/phid/ManiphestTaskPHIDType.php',
'ManiphestTaskPriority' => 'applications/maniphest/constants/ManiphestTaskPriority.php',
'ManiphestTaskPriorityDatasource' => 'applications/maniphest/typeahead/ManiphestTaskPriorityDatasource.php',
'ManiphestTaskPriorityHeraldAction' => 'applications/maniphest/herald/ManiphestTaskPriorityHeraldAction.php',
'ManiphestTaskPriorityHeraldField' => 'applications/maniphest/herald/ManiphestTaskPriorityHeraldField.php',
'ManiphestTaskQuery' => 'applications/maniphest/query/ManiphestTaskQuery.php',
'ManiphestTaskResultListView' => 'applications/maniphest/view/ManiphestTaskResultListView.php',
'ManiphestTaskSearchEngine' => 'applications/maniphest/query/ManiphestTaskSearchEngine.php',
'ManiphestTaskStatus' => 'applications/maniphest/constants/ManiphestTaskStatus.php',
'ManiphestTaskStatusDatasource' => 'applications/maniphest/typeahead/ManiphestTaskStatusDatasource.php',
'ManiphestTaskStatusFunctionDatasource' => 'applications/maniphest/typeahead/ManiphestTaskStatusFunctionDatasource.php',
'ManiphestTaskStatusHeraldAction' => 'applications/maniphest/herald/ManiphestTaskStatusHeraldAction.php',
'ManiphestTaskStatusHeraldField' => 'applications/maniphest/herald/ManiphestTaskStatusHeraldField.php',
'ManiphestTaskStatusTestCase' => 'applications/maniphest/constants/__tests__/ManiphestTaskStatusTestCase.php',
'ManiphestTaskTestCase' => 'applications/maniphest/__tests__/ManiphestTaskTestCase.php',
'ManiphestTaskTitleHeraldField' => 'applications/maniphest/herald/ManiphestTaskTitleHeraldField.php',
'ManiphestTransaction' => 'applications/maniphest/storage/ManiphestTransaction.php',
'ManiphestTransactionComment' => 'applications/maniphest/storage/ManiphestTransactionComment.php',
'ManiphestTransactionEditor' => 'applications/maniphest/editor/ManiphestTransactionEditor.php',
Migrate all Maniphest transaction data to new storage Summary: Ref T2217. This is the risky, hard part; everything after this should be smooth sailing. This is //mostly// clean, except: - The old format would opportunistically combine a comment with some other transaction type if it could. We no longer do that, so: - When migrating, "edit" + "comment" transactions need to be split in two. - When editing now, we should no longer combine these transaction types. - These changes are pretty straightforward and low-impact. - This migration promotes "auxiliary field" data to the new CustomField/StandardField format, so that's not a straight migration either. The formats are very similar, though. Broadly, this takes the same attack that the auth migration did: proxy all the code through to the new storage. `ManiphestTransaction` is now just an API on top of `ManiphestTransactionPro`, which is the new storage format. The two formats are very similar, so this was mostly a straight copy from one table to the other. Test Plan: - Without performing the migration, made a bunch of edits and comments on tasks and verified the new code works correctly. - Droped the test data and performed the migration. - Looked at the resulting data for obvious discrepancies. - Looked at a bunch of tasks and their transaction history. - Used Conduit to pull transaction data. - Edited task description and clicked "View Details" on transaction. - Used batch editor. - Made a bunch more edits. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2217 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7068
2013-09-23 23:25:28 +02:00
'ManiphestTransactionQuery' => 'applications/maniphest/query/ManiphestTransactionQuery.php',
'ManiphestUpdateConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/maniphest/conduit/ManiphestUpdateConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ManiphestView' => 'applications/maniphest/view/ManiphestView.php',
'MetaMTAEmailTransactionCommand' => 'applications/metamta/command/MetaMTAEmailTransactionCommand.php',
'MetaMTAEmailTransactionCommandTestCase' => 'applications/metamta/command/__tests__/MetaMTAEmailTransactionCommandTestCase.php',
'MetaMTAMailReceivedGarbageCollector' => 'applications/metamta/garbagecollector/MetaMTAMailReceivedGarbageCollector.php',
'MetaMTAMailSentGarbageCollector' => 'applications/metamta/garbagecollector/MetaMTAMailSentGarbageCollector.php',
'MetaMTAReceivedMailStatus' => 'applications/metamta/constants/MetaMTAReceivedMailStatus.php',
'MultimeterContext' => 'applications/multimeter/storage/MultimeterContext.php',
'MultimeterControl' => 'applications/multimeter/data/MultimeterControl.php',
'MultimeterController' => 'applications/multimeter/controller/MultimeterController.php',
'MultimeterDAO' => 'applications/multimeter/storage/MultimeterDAO.php',
'MultimeterDimension' => 'applications/multimeter/storage/MultimeterDimension.php',
'MultimeterEvent' => 'applications/multimeter/storage/MultimeterEvent.php',
'MultimeterEventGarbageCollector' => 'applications/multimeter/garbagecollector/MultimeterEventGarbageCollector.php',
'MultimeterHost' => 'applications/multimeter/storage/MultimeterHost.php',
'MultimeterLabel' => 'applications/multimeter/storage/MultimeterLabel.php',
'MultimeterSampleController' => 'applications/multimeter/controller/MultimeterSampleController.php',
'MultimeterViewer' => 'applications/multimeter/storage/MultimeterViewer.php',
'NuanceConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/nuance/conduit/NuanceConduitAPIMethod.php',
'NuanceConsoleController' => 'applications/nuance/controller/NuanceConsoleController.php',
'NuanceController' => 'applications/nuance/controller/NuanceController.php',
'NuanceCreateItemConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/nuance/conduit/NuanceCreateItemConduitAPIMethod.php',
'NuanceDAO' => 'applications/nuance/storage/NuanceDAO.php',
'NuanceItem' => 'applications/nuance/storage/NuanceItem.php',
'NuanceItemEditController' => 'applications/nuance/controller/NuanceItemEditController.php',
'NuanceItemEditor' => 'applications/nuance/editor/NuanceItemEditor.php',
'NuanceItemPHIDType' => 'applications/nuance/phid/NuanceItemPHIDType.php',
'NuanceItemQuery' => 'applications/nuance/query/NuanceItemQuery.php',
'NuanceItemTransaction' => 'applications/nuance/storage/NuanceItemTransaction.php',
'NuanceItemTransactionComment' => 'applications/nuance/storage/NuanceItemTransactionComment.php',
'NuanceItemTransactionQuery' => 'applications/nuance/query/NuanceItemTransactionQuery.php',
'NuanceItemViewController' => 'applications/nuance/controller/NuanceItemViewController.php',
'NuancePhabricatorFormSourceDefinition' => 'applications/nuance/source/NuancePhabricatorFormSourceDefinition.php',
'NuanceQuery' => 'applications/nuance/query/NuanceQuery.php',
'NuanceQueue' => 'applications/nuance/storage/NuanceQueue.php',
'NuanceQueueDatasource' => 'applications/nuance/typeahead/NuanceQueueDatasource.php',
'NuanceQueueEditController' => 'applications/nuance/controller/NuanceQueueEditController.php',
'NuanceQueueEditor' => 'applications/nuance/editor/NuanceQueueEditor.php',
'NuanceQueueListController' => 'applications/nuance/controller/NuanceQueueListController.php',
'NuanceQueuePHIDType' => 'applications/nuance/phid/NuanceQueuePHIDType.php',
'NuanceQueueQuery' => 'applications/nuance/query/NuanceQueueQuery.php',
'NuanceQueueSearchEngine' => 'applications/nuance/query/NuanceQueueSearchEngine.php',
'NuanceQueueTransaction' => 'applications/nuance/storage/NuanceQueueTransaction.php',
'NuanceQueueTransactionComment' => 'applications/nuance/storage/NuanceQueueTransactionComment.php',
'NuanceQueueTransactionQuery' => 'applications/nuance/query/NuanceQueueTransactionQuery.php',
'NuanceQueueViewController' => 'applications/nuance/controller/NuanceQueueViewController.php',
'NuanceRequestor' => 'applications/nuance/storage/NuanceRequestor.php',
'NuanceRequestorEditController' => 'applications/nuance/controller/NuanceRequestorEditController.php',
'NuanceRequestorEditor' => 'applications/nuance/editor/NuanceRequestorEditor.php',
'NuanceRequestorPHIDType' => 'applications/nuance/phid/NuanceRequestorPHIDType.php',
'NuanceRequestorQuery' => 'applications/nuance/query/NuanceRequestorQuery.php',
'NuanceRequestorSource' => 'applications/nuance/storage/NuanceRequestorSource.php',
'NuanceRequestorTransaction' => 'applications/nuance/storage/NuanceRequestorTransaction.php',
'NuanceRequestorTransactionComment' => 'applications/nuance/storage/NuanceRequestorTransactionComment.php',
'NuanceRequestorTransactionQuery' => 'applications/nuance/query/NuanceRequestorTransactionQuery.php',
'NuanceRequestorViewController' => 'applications/nuance/controller/NuanceRequestorViewController.php',
'NuanceSchemaSpec' => 'applications/nuance/storage/NuanceSchemaSpec.php',
'NuanceSource' => 'applications/nuance/storage/NuanceSource.php',
'NuanceSourceActionController' => 'applications/nuance/controller/NuanceSourceActionController.php',
'NuanceSourceCreateController' => 'applications/nuance/controller/NuanceSourceCreateController.php',
'NuanceSourceDefaultEditCapability' => 'applications/nuance/capability/NuanceSourceDefaultEditCapability.php',
'NuanceSourceDefaultViewCapability' => 'applications/nuance/capability/NuanceSourceDefaultViewCapability.php',
'NuanceSourceDefinition' => 'applications/nuance/source/NuanceSourceDefinition.php',
'NuanceSourceDefinitionTestCase' => 'applications/nuance/source/__tests__/NuanceSourceDefinitionTestCase.php',
'NuanceSourceEditController' => 'applications/nuance/controller/NuanceSourceEditController.php',
'NuanceSourceEditor' => 'applications/nuance/editor/NuanceSourceEditor.php',
'NuanceSourceListController' => 'applications/nuance/controller/NuanceSourceListController.php',
'NuanceSourceManageCapability' => 'applications/nuance/capability/NuanceSourceManageCapability.php',
'NuanceSourcePHIDType' => 'applications/nuance/phid/NuanceSourcePHIDType.php',
'NuanceSourceQuery' => 'applications/nuance/query/NuanceSourceQuery.php',
'NuanceSourceSearchEngine' => 'applications/nuance/query/NuanceSourceSearchEngine.php',
'NuanceSourceTransaction' => 'applications/nuance/storage/NuanceSourceTransaction.php',
'NuanceSourceTransactionComment' => 'applications/nuance/storage/NuanceSourceTransactionComment.php',
'NuanceSourceTransactionQuery' => 'applications/nuance/query/NuanceSourceTransactionQuery.php',
'NuanceSourceViewController' => 'applications/nuance/controller/NuanceSourceViewController.php',
'NuanceTransaction' => 'applications/nuance/storage/NuanceTransaction.php',
'OwnersConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/owners/conduit/OwnersConduitAPIMethod.php',
'OwnersEditConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/owners/conduit/OwnersEditConduitAPIMethod.php',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'OwnersPackageReplyHandler' => 'applications/owners/mail/OwnersPackageReplyHandler.php',
'OwnersQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/owners/conduit/OwnersQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'OwnersSearchConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/owners/conduit/OwnersSearchConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PHIDConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phid/conduit/PHIDConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PHIDInfoConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phid/conduit/PHIDInfoConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PHIDLookupConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phid/conduit/PHIDLookupConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PHIDQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phid/conduit/PHIDQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PHUI' => 'view/phui/PHUI.php',
'PHUIActionPanelExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUIActionPanelExample.php',
'PHUIActionPanelView' => 'view/phui/PHUIActionPanelView.php',
Make mobile navigation work properly by default in more cases Summary: Fixes T5752. This obsoletes a bunch of old patterns and I'll follow up on those with a big "go do a bunch of mechanical code changes" task. Major goals are: - Don't load named queries multiple times on search pages. - Don't require extra code to get standard navigation right on mobile. - Reduce the amount of boilerplate in ListControllers. - Reduce the amount of boilerplate around navigation/menus in all controllers. Specifically, here's what this does: - The StandardPage is now a smarter/more structured object with `setNavigation()` and `setCrumbs()` methods. More rendering decisions are delayed until the last possible moment. - It uses this to automatically add crumb actions to the application menu. - It uses this to automatically reuse one SearchEngine instead of running queries multiple times. - The new preferred way to build responses is `$this->newPage()` (like `$this->newDialog()`), which has structured methods for adding stuff (`setTitle()`, etc). - SearchEngine exposes a new convenience method so you don't have to do all the controller delegation stuff. - Building menus is generally simpler. Test Plan: - Tested paste list, view, edit, comment, raw controllers for functionality, mobile menu, crumbs, navigation menu. - Edited saved queries. - Tested Differential, Maniphest (no changes). - Verified the paste pages don't run any duplicate NamedQuery queries. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T5752 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14382
2015-11-02 21:06:28 +01:00
'PHUIApplicationMenuView' => 'view/layout/PHUIApplicationMenuView.php',
'PHUIBadgeBoxView' => 'view/phui/PHUIBadgeBoxView.php',
'PHUIBadgeExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUIBadgeExample.php',
'PHUIBadgeMiniView' => 'view/phui/PHUIBadgeMiniView.php',
'PHUIBadgeView' => 'view/phui/PHUIBadgeView.php',
'PHUIBoxExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUIBoxExample.php',
'PHUIBoxView' => 'view/phui/PHUIBoxView.php',
'PHUIButtonBarExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUIButtonBarExample.php',
'PHUIButtonBarView' => 'view/phui/PHUIButtonBarView.php',
'PHUIButtonExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUIButtonExample.php',
'PHUIButtonView' => 'view/phui/PHUIButtonView.php',
'PHUICalendarDayView' => 'view/phui/calendar/PHUICalendarDayView.php',
'PHUICalendarListView' => 'view/phui/calendar/PHUICalendarListView.php',
'PHUICalendarMonthView' => 'view/phui/calendar/PHUICalendarMonthView.php',
'PHUICalendarWidgetView' => 'view/phui/calendar/PHUICalendarWidgetView.php',
'PHUIColorPalletteExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUIColorPalletteExample.php',
'PHUICrumbView' => 'view/phui/PHUICrumbView.php',
'PHUICrumbsView' => 'view/phui/PHUICrumbsView.php',
'PHUIDiffInlineCommentDetailView' => 'infrastructure/diff/view/PHUIDiffInlineCommentDetailView.php',
'PHUIDiffInlineCommentEditView' => 'infrastructure/diff/view/PHUIDiffInlineCommentEditView.php',
'PHUIDiffInlineCommentRowScaffold' => 'infrastructure/diff/view/PHUIDiffInlineCommentRowScaffold.php',
'PHUIDiffInlineCommentTableScaffold' => 'infrastructure/diff/view/PHUIDiffInlineCommentTableScaffold.php',
'PHUIDiffInlineCommentUndoView' => 'infrastructure/diff/view/PHUIDiffInlineCommentUndoView.php',
'PHUIDiffInlineCommentView' => 'infrastructure/diff/view/PHUIDiffInlineCommentView.php',
'PHUIDiffOneUpInlineCommentRowScaffold' => 'infrastructure/diff/view/PHUIDiffOneUpInlineCommentRowScaffold.php',
'PHUIDiffRevealIconView' => 'infrastructure/diff/view/PHUIDiffRevealIconView.php',
'PHUIDiffTableOfContentsItemView' => 'infrastructure/diff/view/PHUIDiffTableOfContentsItemView.php',
'PHUIDiffTableOfContentsListView' => 'infrastructure/diff/view/PHUIDiffTableOfContentsListView.php',
'PHUIDiffTwoUpInlineCommentRowScaffold' => 'infrastructure/diff/view/PHUIDiffTwoUpInlineCommentRowScaffold.php',
'PHUIDocumentExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUIDocumentExample.php',
'PHUIDocumentSummaryView' => 'view/phui/PHUIDocumentSummaryView.php',
'PHUIDocumentView' => 'view/phui/PHUIDocumentView.php',
'PHUIDocumentViewPro' => 'view/phui/PHUIDocumentViewPro.php',
'PHUIFeedStoryExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUIFeedStoryExample.php',
'PHUIFeedStoryView' => 'view/phui/PHUIFeedStoryView.php',
'PHUIFormDividerControl' => 'view/form/control/PHUIFormDividerControl.php',
'PHUIFormFreeformDateControl' => 'view/form/control/PHUIFormFreeformDateControl.php',
'PHUIFormInsetView' => 'view/form/PHUIFormInsetView.php',
'PHUIFormLayoutView' => 'view/form/PHUIFormLayoutView.php',
Add a basic multipage form Summary: Ref T2232. Very busy day on IRC so I feel like I've made 20 minutes of progress in 1-minute spurts here, but this adds the basics for a form that can have multiple pages and automatically handle pagination and reading to/from the request, objects and responses. The UIExample is reasonably instructive. Basically, you make a form, add pages to the form, and add controls to the pages. The core flow control looks like this: if ($request->isFormPost()) { $form->readFromRequest($request); // (1) if ($form->isComplete()) { // (2) $response = $form->writeToResponse($response); // (3) // Process result here. // (4) } } else { $form->readFromObject($object); // (5) } The key parts are: # This reads the form state from the request, including reading all the inactive pages. # This tests if all pages are valid and the user just clicked "Done" on the last page. # This produces a "response", which might be writing to an object (for simpler forms) or creating a transaction record (for more complex forms). # Here, we would save the object or apply the transactions. # When the user views the form for the first time, we preload all the values from some object (which might just be empty). Ultimate goal here is to fix repository creation to not be a terrible pit of awfulness. There are probably a lot of rough edges and missing features still, but this seems to not be totally crazy. I'm using two submit buttons with different names which doesn't work on IE7 or something, but we can JS our way out of that if we need to. Test Plan: Paged forward and backward through the form. Reviewers: btrahan, chad Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2232 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6003
2013-05-23 23:39:01 +02:00
'PHUIFormMultiSubmitControl' => 'view/form/control/PHUIFormMultiSubmitControl.php',
'PHUIFormPageView' => 'view/form/PHUIFormPageView.php',
'PHUIHandleListView' => 'applications/phid/view/PHUIHandleListView.php',
'PHUIHandleTagListView' => 'applications/phid/view/PHUIHandleTagListView.php',
'PHUIHandleView' => 'applications/phid/view/PHUIHandleView.php',
'PHUIHeaderView' => 'view/phui/PHUIHeaderView.php',
'PHUIIconExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUIIconExample.php',
'PHUIIconView' => 'view/phui/PHUIIconView.php',
'PHUIImageMaskExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUIImageMaskExample.php',
'PHUIImageMaskView' => 'view/phui/PHUIImageMaskView.php',
'PHUIInfoExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUIInfoExample.php',
'PHUIInfoPanelExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUIInfoPanelExample.php',
'PHUIInfoPanelView' => 'view/phui/PHUIInfoPanelView.php',
'PHUIInfoView' => 'view/form/PHUIInfoView.php',
'PHUIListExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUIListExample.php',
'PHUIListItemView' => 'view/phui/PHUIListItemView.php',
'PHUIListView' => 'view/phui/PHUIListView.php',
'PHUIListViewTestCase' => 'view/layout/__tests__/PHUIListViewTestCase.php',
'PHUIObjectBoxView' => 'view/phui/PHUIObjectBoxView.php',
'PHUIObjectItemListExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUIObjectItemListExample.php',
'PHUIObjectItemListView' => 'view/phui/PHUIObjectItemListView.php',
'PHUIObjectItemView' => 'view/phui/PHUIObjectItemView.php',
Add a basic multipage form Summary: Ref T2232. Very busy day on IRC so I feel like I've made 20 minutes of progress in 1-minute spurts here, but this adds the basics for a form that can have multiple pages and automatically handle pagination and reading to/from the request, objects and responses. The UIExample is reasonably instructive. Basically, you make a form, add pages to the form, and add controls to the pages. The core flow control looks like this: if ($request->isFormPost()) { $form->readFromRequest($request); // (1) if ($form->isComplete()) { // (2) $response = $form->writeToResponse($response); // (3) // Process result here. // (4) } } else { $form->readFromObject($object); // (5) } The key parts are: # This reads the form state from the request, including reading all the inactive pages. # This tests if all pages are valid and the user just clicked "Done" on the last page. # This produces a "response", which might be writing to an object (for simpler forms) or creating a transaction record (for more complex forms). # Here, we would save the object or apply the transactions. # When the user views the form for the first time, we preload all the values from some object (which might just be empty). Ultimate goal here is to fix repository creation to not be a terrible pit of awfulness. There are probably a lot of rough edges and missing features still, but this seems to not be totally crazy. I'm using two submit buttons with different names which doesn't work on IE7 or something, but we can JS our way out of that if we need to. Test Plan: Paged forward and backward through the form. Reviewers: btrahan, chad Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2232 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6003
2013-05-23 23:39:01 +02:00
'PHUIPagedFormView' => 'view/form/PHUIPagedFormView.php',
'PHUIPagerView' => 'view/phui/PHUIPagerView.php',
'PHUIPinboardItemView' => 'view/phui/PHUIPinboardItemView.php',
'PHUIPinboardView' => 'view/phui/PHUIPinboardView.php',
'PHUIPropertyGroupView' => 'view/phui/PHUIPropertyGroupView.php',
'PHUIPropertyListExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUIPropertyListExample.php',
'PHUIPropertyListView' => 'view/phui/PHUIPropertyListView.php',
'PHUIRemarkupPreviewPanel' => 'view/phui/PHUIRemarkupPreviewPanel.php',
'PHUIRemarkupView' => 'infrastructure/markup/view/PHUIRemarkupView.php',
'PHUISpacesNamespaceContextView' => 'applications/spaces/view/PHUISpacesNamespaceContextView.php',
'PHUIStatusItemView' => 'view/phui/PHUIStatusItemView.php',
'PHUIStatusListView' => 'view/phui/PHUIStatusListView.php',
'PHUITagExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUITagExample.php',
'PHUITagView' => 'view/phui/PHUITagView.php',
'PHUITextExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUITextExample.php',
'PHUITextView' => 'view/phui/PHUITextView.php',
'PHUITimelineEventView' => 'view/phui/PHUITimelineEventView.php',
'PHUITimelineExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUITimelineExample.php',
'PHUITimelineView' => 'view/phui/PHUITimelineView.php',
'PHUITwoColumnView' => 'view/phui/PHUITwoColumnView.php',
'PHUITypeaheadExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PHUITypeaheadExample.php',
'PHUIWorkboardView' => 'view/phui/PHUIWorkboardView.php',
'PHUIWorkpanelView' => 'view/phui/PHUIWorkpanelView.php',
'PassphraseAbstractKey' => 'applications/passphrase/keys/PassphraseAbstractKey.php',
'PassphraseConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/passphrase/conduit/PassphraseConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PassphraseController' => 'applications/passphrase/controller/PassphraseController.php',
'PassphraseCredential' => 'applications/passphrase/storage/PassphraseCredential.php',
'PassphraseCredentialAuthorPolicyRule' => 'applications/passphrase/policyrule/PassphraseCredentialAuthorPolicyRule.php',
'PassphraseCredentialConduitController' => 'applications/passphrase/controller/PassphraseCredentialConduitController.php',
'PassphraseCredentialControl' => 'applications/passphrase/view/PassphraseCredentialControl.php',
'PassphraseCredentialCreateController' => 'applications/passphrase/controller/PassphraseCredentialCreateController.php',
'PassphraseCredentialDestroyController' => 'applications/passphrase/controller/PassphraseCredentialDestroyController.php',
'PassphraseCredentialEditController' => 'applications/passphrase/controller/PassphraseCredentialEditController.php',
'PassphraseCredentialListController' => 'applications/passphrase/controller/PassphraseCredentialListController.php',
'PassphraseCredentialLockController' => 'applications/passphrase/controller/PassphraseCredentialLockController.php',
'PassphraseCredentialPHIDType' => 'applications/passphrase/phid/PassphraseCredentialPHIDType.php',
'PassphraseCredentialPublicController' => 'applications/passphrase/controller/PassphraseCredentialPublicController.php',
'PassphraseCredentialQuery' => 'applications/passphrase/query/PassphraseCredentialQuery.php',
'PassphraseCredentialRevealController' => 'applications/passphrase/controller/PassphraseCredentialRevealController.php',
'PassphraseCredentialSearchEngine' => 'applications/passphrase/query/PassphraseCredentialSearchEngine.php',
'PassphraseCredentialTransaction' => 'applications/passphrase/storage/PassphraseCredentialTransaction.php',
'PassphraseCredentialTransactionEditor' => 'applications/passphrase/editor/PassphraseCredentialTransactionEditor.php',
'PassphraseCredentialTransactionQuery' => 'applications/passphrase/query/PassphraseCredentialTransactionQuery.php',
'PassphraseCredentialType' => 'applications/passphrase/credentialtype/PassphraseCredentialType.php',
'PassphraseCredentialTypeTestCase' => 'applications/passphrase/credentialtype/__tests__/PassphraseCredentialTypeTestCase.php',
'PassphraseCredentialViewController' => 'applications/passphrase/controller/PassphraseCredentialViewController.php',
'PassphraseDAO' => 'applications/passphrase/storage/PassphraseDAO.php',
'PassphraseDefaultEditCapability' => 'applications/passphrase/capability/PassphraseDefaultEditCapability.php',
'PassphraseDefaultViewCapability' => 'applications/passphrase/capability/PassphraseDefaultViewCapability.php',
'PassphraseNoteCredentialType' => 'applications/passphrase/credentialtype/PassphraseNoteCredentialType.php',
'PassphrasePasswordCredentialType' => 'applications/passphrase/credentialtype/PassphrasePasswordCredentialType.php',
'PassphrasePasswordKey' => 'applications/passphrase/keys/PassphrasePasswordKey.php',
'PassphraseQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/passphrase/conduit/PassphraseQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PassphraseRemarkupRule' => 'applications/passphrase/remarkup/PassphraseRemarkupRule.php',
'PassphraseSSHGeneratedKeyCredentialType' => 'applications/passphrase/credentialtype/PassphraseSSHGeneratedKeyCredentialType.php',
'PassphraseSSHKey' => 'applications/passphrase/keys/PassphraseSSHKey.php',
'PassphraseSSHPrivateKeyCredentialType' => 'applications/passphrase/credentialtype/PassphraseSSHPrivateKeyCredentialType.php',
'PassphraseSSHPrivateKeyFileCredentialType' => 'applications/passphrase/credentialtype/PassphraseSSHPrivateKeyFileCredentialType.php',
'PassphraseSSHPrivateKeyTextCredentialType' => 'applications/passphrase/credentialtype/PassphraseSSHPrivateKeyTextCredentialType.php',
'PassphraseSchemaSpec' => 'applications/passphrase/storage/PassphraseSchemaSpec.php',
'PassphraseSearchIndexer' => 'applications/passphrase/search/PassphraseSearchIndexer.php',
'PassphraseSecret' => 'applications/passphrase/storage/PassphraseSecret.php',
'PasteConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/paste/conduit/PasteConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PasteCreateConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/paste/conduit/PasteCreateConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PasteCreateMailReceiver' => 'applications/paste/mail/PasteCreateMailReceiver.php',
'PasteDefaultEditCapability' => 'applications/paste/capability/PasteDefaultEditCapability.php',
'PasteDefaultViewCapability' => 'applications/paste/capability/PasteDefaultViewCapability.php',
'PasteEditConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/paste/conduit/PasteEditConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PasteEmbedView' => 'applications/paste/view/PasteEmbedView.php',
'PasteInfoConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/paste/conduit/PasteInfoConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PasteMailReceiver' => 'applications/paste/mail/PasteMailReceiver.php',
'PasteQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/paste/conduit/PasteQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PasteReplyHandler' => 'applications/paste/mail/PasteReplyHandler.php',
'PasteSearchConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/paste/conduit/PasteSearchConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PeopleBrowseUserDirectoryCapability' => 'applications/people/capability/PeopleBrowseUserDirectoryCapability.php',
'PeopleCreateUsersCapability' => 'applications/people/capability/PeopleCreateUsersCapability.php',
'PeopleUserLogGarbageCollector' => 'applications/people/garbagecollector/PeopleUserLogGarbageCollector.php',
'Phabricator404Controller' => 'applications/base/controller/Phabricator404Controller.php',
'PhabricatorAWSConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorAWSConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorAccessControlTestCase' => 'applications/base/controller/__tests__/PhabricatorAccessControlTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorAccessLog' => 'infrastructure/log/PhabricatorAccessLog.php',
'PhabricatorAccessLogConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorAccessLogConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorAccountSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorAccountSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorActionListView' => 'view/layout/PhabricatorActionListView.php',
'PhabricatorActionView' => 'view/layout/PhabricatorActionView.php',
'PhabricatorActivitySettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorActivitySettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorAdministratorsPolicyRule' => 'applications/people/policyrule/PhabricatorAdministratorsPolicyRule.php',
'PhabricatorAjaxRequestExceptionHandler' => 'aphront/handler/PhabricatorAjaxRequestExceptionHandler.php',
'PhabricatorAlmanacApplication' => 'applications/almanac/application/PhabricatorAlmanacApplication.php',
'PhabricatorAmazonAuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorAmazonAuthProvider.php',
'PhabricatorAnchorView' => 'view/layout/PhabricatorAnchorView.php',
'PhabricatorAphlictManagementDebugWorkflow' => 'applications/aphlict/management/PhabricatorAphlictManagementDebugWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAphlictManagementRestartWorkflow' => 'applications/aphlict/management/PhabricatorAphlictManagementRestartWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAphlictManagementStartWorkflow' => 'applications/aphlict/management/PhabricatorAphlictManagementStartWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAphlictManagementStatusWorkflow' => 'applications/aphlict/management/PhabricatorAphlictManagementStatusWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAphlictManagementStopWorkflow' => 'applications/aphlict/management/PhabricatorAphlictManagementStopWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAphlictManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/aphlict/management/PhabricatorAphlictManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAphlictSetupCheck' => 'applications/notification/setup/PhabricatorAphlictSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorAphrontBarUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PhabricatorAphrontBarUIExample.php',
'PhabricatorAphrontViewTestCase' => 'view/__tests__/PhabricatorAphrontViewTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorAppSearchEngine' => 'applications/meta/query/PhabricatorAppSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorApplication' => 'applications/base/PhabricatorApplication.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationApplicationPHIDType' => 'applications/meta/phid/PhabricatorApplicationApplicationPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationConfigurationPanel' => 'applications/meta/panel/PhabricatorApplicationConfigurationPanel.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationConfigurationPanelTestCase' => 'applications/meta/panel/__tests__/PhabricatorApplicationConfigurationPanelTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationDatasource' => 'applications/meta/typeahead/PhabricatorApplicationDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationDetailViewController' => 'applications/meta/controller/PhabricatorApplicationDetailViewController.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationEditController' => 'applications/meta/controller/PhabricatorApplicationEditController.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationEditHTTPParameterHelpView' => 'applications/transactions/view/PhabricatorApplicationEditHTTPParameterHelpView.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationEmailCommandsController' => 'applications/meta/controller/PhabricatorApplicationEmailCommandsController.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationLaunchView' => 'applications/meta/view/PhabricatorApplicationLaunchView.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationPanelController' => 'applications/meta/controller/PhabricatorApplicationPanelController.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationQuery' => 'applications/meta/query/PhabricatorApplicationQuery.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationSearchController' => 'applications/search/controller/PhabricatorApplicationSearchController.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine' => 'applications/search/engine/PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngineTestCase' => 'applications/search/engine/__tests__/PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngineTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationSearchResultView' => 'applications/search/view/PhabricatorApplicationSearchResultView.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationStatusView' => 'applications/meta/view/PhabricatorApplicationStatusView.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTestCase' => 'applications/base/__tests__/PhabricatorApplicationTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction' => 'applications/transactions/storage/PhabricatorApplicationTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment' => 'applications/transactions/storage/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentEditController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentEditController.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentEditor' => 'applications/transactions/editor/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentEditor.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentHistoryController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentHistoryController.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentQuery' => 'applications/transactions/query/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentQuery.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentQuoteController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentQuoteController.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentRawController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentRawController.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentRemoveController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentRemoveController.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentView' => 'applications/transactions/view/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentView.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionController.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionDetailController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionDetailController.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor' => 'applications/transactions/editor/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionFeedStory' => 'applications/transactions/feed/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionFeedStory.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface' => 'applications/transactions/interface/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface.php',
Add ApplicationTransaction handling for transactions with no effect Summary: When a user submits an action with no effect (like an empty comment, an "abandon" on an already-accepted revision, or a "close, resolved" on a closed task) we want to alert them that their action isn't effective. These warnings fall into two general buckets: - User is submitting two or more actions, and some aren't effective but some are. Prompt them to apply the effective actions only. - A special case of this is where the only effective action is a comment. We provide tailored text ("Post Comment") in this case. - User is submitting one action, which isn't effective. Tell them they're out of luck. - A special case of this is an empty comment. We provide tailored text in this case. By default, the transaction editor throws when transactions have no effect. The caller can then deal with this, or use `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionNoEffectResponse` to provide a standard dialog that gives the user information as above. For cases where we expect transactions to have no effect (notably, "edit" forms) we just continue on no-effect unconditionally. Also fix an issue where new, combined or filtered transactions would not be represented properly in the Ajax response (i.e., return final transactions from `applyTransactions()`), and translate some strings. Test Plan: - Submitted empty and nonempy comments in Macro and Pholio. - Submitted comments with new and existing "@mentions". - Submitted edits in both applications. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T912, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4160
2012-12-12 02:27:40 +01:00
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionNoEffectException' => 'applications/transactions/exception/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionNoEffectException.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionNoEffectResponse' => 'applications/transactions/response/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionNoEffectResponse.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionPublishWorker' => 'applications/transactions/worker/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionPublishWorker.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery' => 'applications/transactions/query/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler' => 'applications/transactions/replyhandler/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionResponse' => 'applications/transactions/response/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionResponse.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionShowOlderController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionShowOlderController.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionStructureException' => 'applications/transactions/exception/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionStructureException.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionTemplatedCommentQuery' => 'applications/transactions/query/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionTemplatedCommentQuery.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionTextDiffDetailView' => 'applications/transactions/view/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionTextDiffDetailView.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionTransactionPHIDType' => 'applications/transactions/phid/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionTransactionPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionValidationError' => 'applications/transactions/error/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionValidationError.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionValidationException' => 'applications/transactions/exception/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionValidationException.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionValidationResponse' => 'applications/transactions/response/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionValidationResponse.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionValueController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionValueController.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionView' => 'applications/transactions/view/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionView.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationUninstallController' => 'applications/meta/controller/PhabricatorApplicationUninstallController.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationsApplication' => 'applications/meta/application/PhabricatorApplicationsApplication.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationsController' => 'applications/meta/controller/PhabricatorApplicationsController.php',
'PhabricatorApplicationsListController' => 'applications/meta/controller/PhabricatorApplicationsListController.php',
'PhabricatorAsanaAuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorAsanaAuthProvider.php',
'PhabricatorAsanaConfigOptions' => 'applications/doorkeeper/option/PhabricatorAsanaConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorAsanaSubtaskHasObjectEdgeType' => 'applications/doorkeeper/edge/PhabricatorAsanaSubtaskHasObjectEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorAsanaTaskHasObjectEdgeType' => 'applications/doorkeeper/edge/PhabricatorAsanaTaskHasObjectEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorAuditActionConstants' => 'applications/audit/constants/PhabricatorAuditActionConstants.php',
'PhabricatorAuditAddCommentController' => 'applications/audit/controller/PhabricatorAuditAddCommentController.php',
'PhabricatorAuditApplication' => 'applications/audit/application/PhabricatorAuditApplication.php',
'PhabricatorAuditCommentEditor' => 'applications/audit/editor/PhabricatorAuditCommentEditor.php',
'PhabricatorAuditCommitStatusConstants' => 'applications/audit/constants/PhabricatorAuditCommitStatusConstants.php',
'PhabricatorAuditController' => 'applications/audit/controller/PhabricatorAuditController.php',
'PhabricatorAuditEditor' => 'applications/audit/editor/PhabricatorAuditEditor.php',
'PhabricatorAuditInlineComment' => 'applications/audit/storage/PhabricatorAuditInlineComment.php',
'PhabricatorAuditListController' => 'applications/audit/controller/PhabricatorAuditListController.php',
'PhabricatorAuditListView' => 'applications/audit/view/PhabricatorAuditListView.php',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'PhabricatorAuditMailReceiver' => 'applications/audit/mail/PhabricatorAuditMailReceiver.php',
'PhabricatorAuditManagementDeleteWorkflow' => 'applications/audit/management/PhabricatorAuditManagementDeleteWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAuditManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/audit/management/PhabricatorAuditManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAuditPreviewController' => 'applications/audit/controller/PhabricatorAuditPreviewController.php',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'PhabricatorAuditReplyHandler' => 'applications/audit/mail/PhabricatorAuditReplyHandler.php',
'PhabricatorAuditStatusConstants' => 'applications/audit/constants/PhabricatorAuditStatusConstants.php',
'PhabricatorAuditTransaction' => 'applications/audit/storage/PhabricatorAuditTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorAuditTransactionComment' => 'applications/audit/storage/PhabricatorAuditTransactionComment.php',
'PhabricatorAuditTransactionQuery' => 'applications/audit/query/PhabricatorAuditTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorAuditTransactionView' => 'applications/audit/view/PhabricatorAuditTransactionView.php',
'PhabricatorAuthAccountView' => 'applications/auth/view/PhabricatorAuthAccountView.php',
'PhabricatorAuthApplication' => 'applications/auth/application/PhabricatorAuthApplication.php',
'PhabricatorAuthAuthFactorPHIDType' => 'applications/auth/phid/PhabricatorAuthAuthFactorPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorAuthAuthProviderPHIDType' => 'applications/auth/phid/PhabricatorAuthAuthProviderPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorAuthConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/auth/conduit/PhabricatorAuthConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PhabricatorAuthConfirmLinkController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthConfirmLinkController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthDAO' => 'applications/auth/storage/PhabricatorAuthDAO.php',
'PhabricatorAuthDisableController' => 'applications/auth/controller/config/PhabricatorAuthDisableController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthDowngradeSessionController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthDowngradeSessionController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthEditController' => 'applications/auth/controller/config/PhabricatorAuthEditController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthFactor' => 'applications/auth/factor/PhabricatorAuthFactor.php',
'PhabricatorAuthFactorConfig' => 'applications/auth/storage/PhabricatorAuthFactorConfig.php',
'PhabricatorAuthFactorTestCase' => 'applications/auth/factor/__tests__/PhabricatorAuthFactorTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorAuthFinishController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthFinishController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthHighSecurityRequiredException' => 'applications/auth/exception/PhabricatorAuthHighSecurityRequiredException.php',
'PhabricatorAuthHighSecurityToken' => 'applications/auth/data/PhabricatorAuthHighSecurityToken.php',
'PhabricatorAuthInvite' => 'applications/auth/storage/PhabricatorAuthInvite.php',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteAccountException' => 'applications/auth/exception/PhabricatorAuthInviteAccountException.php',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteAction' => 'applications/auth/data/PhabricatorAuthInviteAction.php',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteActionTableView' => 'applications/auth/view/PhabricatorAuthInviteActionTableView.php',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthInviteController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteDialogException' => 'applications/auth/exception/PhabricatorAuthInviteDialogException.php',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteEngine' => 'applications/auth/engine/PhabricatorAuthInviteEngine.php',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteException' => 'applications/auth/exception/PhabricatorAuthInviteException.php',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteInvalidException' => 'applications/auth/exception/PhabricatorAuthInviteInvalidException.php',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteLoginException' => 'applications/auth/exception/PhabricatorAuthInviteLoginException.php',
'PhabricatorAuthInvitePHIDType' => 'applications/auth/phid/PhabricatorAuthInvitePHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteQuery' => 'applications/auth/query/PhabricatorAuthInviteQuery.php',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteRegisteredException' => 'applications/auth/exception/PhabricatorAuthInviteRegisteredException.php',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteSearchEngine' => 'applications/auth/query/PhabricatorAuthInviteSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteTestCase' => 'applications/auth/factor/__tests__/PhabricatorAuthInviteTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteVerifyException' => 'applications/auth/exception/PhabricatorAuthInviteVerifyException.php',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteWorker' => 'applications/auth/worker/PhabricatorAuthInviteWorker.php',
'PhabricatorAuthLinkController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthLinkController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthListController' => 'applications/auth/controller/config/PhabricatorAuthListController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthLoginController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthLoginController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthLoginHandler' => 'applications/auth/handler/PhabricatorAuthLoginHandler.php',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementCachePKCS8Workflow' => 'applications/auth/management/PhabricatorAuthManagementCachePKCS8Workflow.php',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementLDAPWorkflow' => 'applications/auth/management/PhabricatorAuthManagementLDAPWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementListFactorsWorkflow' => 'applications/auth/management/PhabricatorAuthManagementListFactorsWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementRecoverWorkflow' => 'applications/auth/management/PhabricatorAuthManagementRecoverWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementRefreshWorkflow' => 'applications/auth/management/PhabricatorAuthManagementRefreshWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementStripWorkflow' => 'applications/auth/management/PhabricatorAuthManagementStripWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementTrustOAuthClientWorkflow' => 'applications/auth/management/PhabricatorAuthManagementTrustOAuthClientWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementUnlimitWorkflow' => 'applications/auth/management/PhabricatorAuthManagementUnlimitWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementUntrustOAuthClientWorkflow' => 'applications/auth/management/PhabricatorAuthManagementUntrustOAuthClientWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementVerifyWorkflow' => 'applications/auth/management/PhabricatorAuthManagementVerifyWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/auth/management/PhabricatorAuthManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorAuthNeedsApprovalController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthNeedsApprovalController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthNeedsMultiFactorController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthNeedsMultiFactorController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthNewController' => 'applications/auth/controller/config/PhabricatorAuthNewController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthOldOAuthRedirectController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthOldOAuthRedirectController.php',
Make password reset emails use one-time tokens Summary: Ref T4398. This code hadn't been touched in a while and had a few crufty bits. **One Time Resets**: Currently, password reset (and similar links) are valid for about 48 hours, but we always use one token to generate them (it's bound to the account). This isn't horrible, but it could be better, and it produces a lot of false positives on HackerOne. Instead, use TemporaryTokens to make each link one-time only and good for no more than 24 hours. **Coupling of Email Verification and One-Time Login**: Currently, one-time login links ("password reset links") are tightly bound to an email address, and using a link verifies that email address. This is convenient for "Welcome" emails, so the user doesn't need to go through two rounds of checking email in order to login, then very their email, then actually get access to Phabricator. However, for other types of these links (like those generated by `bin/auth recover`) there's no need to do any email verification. Instead, make the email verification part optional, and use it on welcome links but not other types of links. **Message Customization**: These links can come out of several workflows: welcome, password reset, username change, or `bin/auth recover`. Add a hint to the URI so the text on the page can be customized a bit to help users through the workflow. **Reset Emails Going to Main Account Email**: Previously, we would send password reset email to the user's primary account email. However, since we verify email coming from reset links this isn't correct and could allow a user to verify an email without actually controlling it. Since the user needs a real account in the first place this does not seem useful on its own, but might be a component in some other attack. The user might also no longer have access to their primary account, in which case this wouldn't be wrong, but would not be very useful. Mitigate this in two ways: - First, send to the actual email address the user entered, not the primary account email address. - Second, don't let these links verify emails: they're just login links. This primarily makes it more difficult for an attacker to add someone else's email to their account, send them a reset link, get them to login and implicitly verify the email by not reading very carefully, and then figure out something interesting to do (there's currently no followup attack here, but allowing this does seem undesirable). **Password Reset Without Old Password**: After a user logs in via email, we send them to the password settings panel (if passwords are enabled) with a code that lets them set a new password without knowing the old one. Previously, this code was static and based on the email address. Instead, issue a one-time code. **Jump Into Hisec**: Normally, when a user who has multi-factor auth on their account logs in, we prompt them for factors but don't put them in high security. You usually don't want to go do high-security stuff immediately after login, and it would be confusing and annoying if normal logins gave you a "YOU ARE IN HIGH SECURITY" alert bubble. However, if we're taking you to the password reset screen, we //do// want to put the user in high security, since that screen requires high security. If we don't do this, the user gets two factor prompts in a row. To accomplish this, we set a cookie when we know we're sending the user into a high security workflow. This cookie makes login finalization upgrade all the way from "partial" to "high security", instead of stopping halfway at "normal". This is safe because the user has just passed a factor check; the only reason we don't normally do this is to reduce annoyance. **Some UI Cleanup**: Some of this was using really old UI. Modernize it a bit. Test Plan: - **One Time Resets** - Used a reset link. - Tried to reuse a reset link, got denied. - Verified each link is different. - **Coupling of Email Verification and One-Time Login** - Verified that `bin/auth`, password reset, and username change links do not have an email verifying URI component. - Tried to tack one on, got denied. - Used the welcome email link to login + verify. - Tried to mutate the URI to not verify, or verify something else: got denied. - **Message Customization** - Viewed messages on the different workflows. They seemed OK. - **Reset Emails Going to Main Account Email** - Sent password reset email to non-primary email. - Received email at specified address. - Verified it does not verify the address. - **Password Reset Without Old Password** - Reset password without knowledge of old one after email reset. - Tried to do that without a key, got denied. - Tried to reuse a key, got denied. - **Jump Into Hisec** - Logged in with MFA user, got factor'd, jumped directly into hisec. - Logged in with non-MFA user, no factors, normal password reset. - **Some UI Cleanup** - Viewed new UI. - **Misc** - Created accounts, logged in with welcome link, got verified. - Changed a username, used link to log back in. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4398 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9252
2014-05-22 19:41:00 +02:00
'PhabricatorAuthOneTimeLoginController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthOneTimeLoginController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorAuthProvider.php',
'PhabricatorAuthProviderConfig' => 'applications/auth/storage/PhabricatorAuthProviderConfig.php',
'PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigController' => 'applications/auth/controller/config/PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigEditor' => 'applications/auth/editor/PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigEditor.php',
'PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigQuery' => 'applications/auth/query/PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigQuery.php',
'PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigTransaction' => 'applications/auth/storage/PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigTransactionQuery' => 'applications/auth/query/PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorAuthQueryPublicKeysConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/auth/conduit/PhabricatorAuthQueryPublicKeysConduitAPIMethod.php',
New Registration Workflow Summary: Currently, registration and authentication are pretty messy. Two concrete problems: - The `PhabricatorLDAPRegistrationController` and `PhabricatorOAuthDefaultRegistrationController` controllers are giant copy/pastes of one another. This is really bad. - We can't practically implement OpenID because we can't reissue the authentication request. Additionally, the OAuth registration controller can be replaced wholesale by config, which is a huge API surface area and a giant mess. Broadly, the problem right now is that registration does too much: we hand it some set of indirect credentials (like OAuth tokens) and expect it to take those the entire way to a registered user. Instead, break registration into smaller steps: - User authenticates with remote service. - Phabricator pulls information (remote account ID, username, email, real name, profile picture, etc) from the remote service and saves it as `PhabricatorUserCredentials`. - Phabricator hands the `PhabricatorUserCredentials` to the registration form, which is agnostic about where they originate from: it can process LDAP credentials, OAuth credentials, plain old email credentials, HTTP basic auth credentials, etc. This doesn't do anything yet -- there is no way to create credentials objects (and no storage patch), but I wanted to get any initial feedback, especially about the event call for T2394. In particular, I think the implementation would look something like this: $profile = $event->getValue('profile') $username = $profile->getDefaultUsername(); $is_employee = is_this_a_facebook_employee($username); if (!$is_employee) { throw new Exception("You are not employed at Facebook."); } $fbid = get_fbid_for_facebook_username($username); $profile->setDefaultEmail($fbid); $profile->setCanEditUsername(false); $profile->setCanEditEmail(false); $profile->setCanEditRealName(false); $profile->setShouldVerifyEmail(true); Seem reasonable? Test Plan: N/A yet, probably fatals. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, codeblock, chad Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, asherkin, nh, wez Maniphest Tasks: T1536, T2394 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4647
2013-06-16 19:13:49 +02:00
'PhabricatorAuthRegisterController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthRegisterController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthRevokeTokenController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthRevokeTokenController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthSSHKey' => 'applications/auth/storage/PhabricatorAuthSSHKey.php',
'PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyDeleteController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyDeleteController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyEditController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyEditController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyGenerateController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyGenerateController.php',
Add a query/policy layer on top of SSH keys for Almanac Summary: Ref T5833. Currently, SSH keys are associated only with users, and are a bit un-modern. I want to let Almanac Devices have SSH keys so devices in a cluster can identify to one another. For example, with hosted installs, initialization will go something like this: - A request comes in for `company.phacility.com`. - A SiteSource (from D10787) makes a Conduit call to Almanac on the master install to check if `company` is a valid install and pull config if it is. - This call can be signed with an SSH key which identifies a trusted Almanac Device. In the cluster case, a web host can make an authenticated call to a repository host with similar key signing. To move toward this, put a proper Query class on top of SSH key access (this diff). In following diffs, I'll: - Rename `userPHID` to `objectPHID`. - Move this to the `auth` database. - Provide UI for device/key association. An alternative approach would be to build some kind of special token layer in Conduit, but I think that would be a lot harder to manage in the hosting case. This gives us a more direct attack on trusting requests from machines and recognizing machines as first (well, sort of second-class) actors without needing things like fake user accounts. Test Plan: - Added and removed SSH keys. - Added and removed SSH keys from a bot account. - Tried to edit an unonwned SSH key (denied). - Ran `bin/ssh-auth`, got sensible output. - Ran `bin/ssh-auth-key`, got sensible output. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T5833 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10790
2014-11-06 21:37:02 +01:00
'PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyQuery' => 'applications/auth/query/PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyQuery.php',
'PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyTableView' => 'applications/auth/view/PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyTableView.php',
'PhabricatorAuthSSHPublicKey' => 'applications/auth/sshkey/PhabricatorAuthSSHPublicKey.php',
'PhabricatorAuthSession' => 'applications/auth/storage/PhabricatorAuthSession.php',
'PhabricatorAuthSessionEngine' => 'applications/auth/engine/PhabricatorAuthSessionEngine.php',
'PhabricatorAuthSessionGarbageCollector' => 'applications/auth/garbagecollector/PhabricatorAuthSessionGarbageCollector.php',
'PhabricatorAuthSessionQuery' => 'applications/auth/query/PhabricatorAuthSessionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorAuthSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorAuthSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorAuthStartController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthStartController.php',
Add "temporary tokens" to auth, for SMS codes, TOTP codes, reset codes, etc Summary: Ref T4398. We have several auth-related systems which require (or are improved by) the ability to hand out one-time codes which expire after a short period of time. In particular, these are: - SMS multi-factor: we need to be able to hand out one-time codes for this in order to prove the user has the phone. - Password reset emails: we use a time-based rotating token right now, but we could improve this with a one-time token, so once you reset your password the link is dead. - TOTP auth: we don't need to verify/invalidate keys, but can improve security by doing so. This adds a generic one-time code storage table, and strengthens the TOTP enrollment process by using it. Specifically, you can no longer edit the enrollment form (the one with a QR code) to force your own key as the TOTP key: only keys Phabricator generated are accepted. This has no practical security impact, but generally helps raise the barrier potential attackers face. Followup changes will use this for reset emails, then implement SMS multi-factor. Test Plan: - Enrolled in TOTP multi-factor auth. - Submitted an error in the form, saw the same key presented. - Edited the form with web tools to provide a different key, saw it reject and the server generate an alternate. - Change the expiration to 5 seconds instead of 1 hour, submitted the form over and over again, saw it cycle the key after 5 seconds. - Looked at the database and saw the tokens I expected. - Ran the GC and saw all the 5-second expiry tokens get cleaned up. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4398 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9217
2014-05-20 20:43:45 +02:00
'PhabricatorAuthTemporaryToken' => 'applications/auth/storage/PhabricatorAuthTemporaryToken.php',
'PhabricatorAuthTemporaryTokenGarbageCollector' => 'applications/auth/garbagecollector/PhabricatorAuthTemporaryTokenGarbageCollector.php',
'PhabricatorAuthTemporaryTokenQuery' => 'applications/auth/query/PhabricatorAuthTemporaryTokenQuery.php',
'PhabricatorAuthTerminateSessionController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthTerminateSessionController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthTryFactorAction' => 'applications/auth/action/PhabricatorAuthTryFactorAction.php',
'PhabricatorAuthUnlinkController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthUnlinkController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthValidateController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorAuthValidateController.php',
'PhabricatorAuthenticationConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorAuthenticationConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorAutoEventListener' => 'infrastructure/events/PhabricatorAutoEventListener.php',
'PhabricatorBadgeHasRecipientEdgeType' => 'applications/badges/edge/PhabricatorBadgeHasRecipientEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesApplication' => 'applications/badges/application/PhabricatorBadgesApplication.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesArchiveController' => 'applications/badges/controller/PhabricatorBadgesArchiveController.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesBadge' => 'applications/badges/storage/PhabricatorBadgesBadge.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesCommentController' => 'applications/badges/controller/PhabricatorBadgesCommentController.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesController' => 'applications/badges/controller/PhabricatorBadgesController.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesCreateCapability' => 'applications/badges/capability/PhabricatorBadgesCreateCapability.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesDAO' => 'applications/badges/storage/PhabricatorBadgesDAO.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesDefaultEditCapability' => 'applications/badges/capability/PhabricatorBadgesDefaultEditCapability.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesEditController' => 'applications/badges/controller/PhabricatorBadgesEditController.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesEditIconController' => 'applications/badges/controller/PhabricatorBadgesEditIconController.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesEditRecipientsController' => 'applications/badges/controller/PhabricatorBadgesEditRecipientsController.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesEditor' => 'applications/badges/editor/PhabricatorBadgesEditor.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesIcon' => 'applications/badges/icon/PhabricatorBadgesIcon.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesListController' => 'applications/badges/controller/PhabricatorBadgesListController.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesMailReceiver' => 'applications/badges/mail/PhabricatorBadgesMailReceiver.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesPHIDType' => 'applications/badges/phid/PhabricatorBadgesPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesQuery' => 'applications/badges/query/PhabricatorBadgesQuery.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesRecipientsListView' => 'applications/badges/view/PhabricatorBadgesRecipientsListView.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesRemoveRecipientsController' => 'applications/badges/controller/PhabricatorBadgesRemoveRecipientsController.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesReplyHandler' => 'applications/badges/mail/PhabricatorBadgesReplyHandler.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesSchemaSpec' => 'applications/badges/storage/PhabricatorBadgesSchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesSearchEngine' => 'applications/badges/query/PhabricatorBadgesSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesTransaction' => 'applications/badges/storage/PhabricatorBadgesTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesTransactionComment' => 'applications/badges/storage/PhabricatorBadgesTransactionComment.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesTransactionQuery' => 'applications/badges/query/PhabricatorBadgesTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorBadgesViewController' => 'applications/badges/controller/PhabricatorBadgesViewController.php',
'PhabricatorBarePageUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PhabricatorBarePageUIExample.php',
'PhabricatorBarePageView' => 'view/page/PhabricatorBarePageView.php',
'PhabricatorBaseURISetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorBaseURISetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorBcryptPasswordHasher' => 'infrastructure/util/password/PhabricatorBcryptPasswordHasher.php',
'PhabricatorBinariesSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorBinariesSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorBitbucketAuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorBitbucketAuthProvider.php',
First pass at decoupling Phabricator bot behavior from the protocol it's running on, this pulls the connection, reading, and writing functionalities out of the bot itself and into the adapter. Summary: Ugh, just wrote out a huge message, only to lose it with a fat-fingered ctrl-c. Le sigh. First pass at decoupling the bot from the protocol. Noticeably absent is the command/message coupling. After this design pass I'll give that a go. Could use some advice, thinking that handlers should only create messages (which can be public or private) and not open ended, undefined 'commands'. The problem being that there needs to be some consistant api if we want handlers to be protocol agnostic. Perhaps that's a pipedream, what are your thoughts? Secondly, a few notes, design review requests on the changes i did make: # Config. For now i'm passing config through to the adapter. This was mainly to remain backwards compatible on the config. I was thinking it should probably be namespaced into it's own subobject though to distinguish the adapter config from the bot config. # Adapter selection. This flavor is the one-bot-daemon, config specified protocol version. The upside is that in the future they won't have to run different daemons for this stuff, just have different config, and the door is open for multiple protocol adapters down the road if need be. The downside is that I had to rename the daemon (non-backwards compatible change) and there will need to be some sort of runtime evaluation for instatiation of the adapter. For now I just have a crude switch, but I was thinking of just taking the string they supply as the class name (ala `try { new $clasName(); } catch...`) so as to allow for homegrown adapters, but I wasn't sure how such runtime magic would go over. Also, an alternative would be to make the PhabricatorBot class a non-abstract non-final base class and have the adapters be accompanied by a bot class that just defines their adapter as a property. The upside of which is backwards compatibility (welcome back PhabricatorIRCBot) and perhaps a little bit clearer plugin path for homegrowners. # Logging. You'll notice I commented out two very important logging lines in the irc adapter. This isn't intended to remain commented out, but I'm not sure what the best way is to get logging at this layer. I'm wary of just composing the daemon back down into the adapter (bi-directional object composition makes my skin crawl), but something needs to happen, obviously. Advice? That's it. After the feedback on the above, you can either merge down, or wait until i finish the command/message refactor if you don't think the diff will grow too large. Up to you, this all functions as is. Test Plan: Ran an irc bot, connected, read input, and wrote output including handler integration. Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley CC: aran, Korvin Maniphest Tasks: T2462 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4757
2013-02-06 03:45:20 +01:00
'PhabricatorBot' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/PhabricatorBot.php',
'PhabricatorBotChannel' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/target/PhabricatorBotChannel.php',
First pass at decoupling Phabricator bot behavior from the protocol it's running on, this pulls the connection, reading, and writing functionalities out of the bot itself and into the adapter. Summary: Ugh, just wrote out a huge message, only to lose it with a fat-fingered ctrl-c. Le sigh. First pass at decoupling the bot from the protocol. Noticeably absent is the command/message coupling. After this design pass I'll give that a go. Could use some advice, thinking that handlers should only create messages (which can be public or private) and not open ended, undefined 'commands'. The problem being that there needs to be some consistant api if we want handlers to be protocol agnostic. Perhaps that's a pipedream, what are your thoughts? Secondly, a few notes, design review requests on the changes i did make: # Config. For now i'm passing config through to the adapter. This was mainly to remain backwards compatible on the config. I was thinking it should probably be namespaced into it's own subobject though to distinguish the adapter config from the bot config. # Adapter selection. This flavor is the one-bot-daemon, config specified protocol version. The upside is that in the future they won't have to run different daemons for this stuff, just have different config, and the door is open for multiple protocol adapters down the road if need be. The downside is that I had to rename the daemon (non-backwards compatible change) and there will need to be some sort of runtime evaluation for instatiation of the adapter. For now I just have a crude switch, but I was thinking of just taking the string they supply as the class name (ala `try { new $clasName(); } catch...`) so as to allow for homegrown adapters, but I wasn't sure how such runtime magic would go over. Also, an alternative would be to make the PhabricatorBot class a non-abstract non-final base class and have the adapters be accompanied by a bot class that just defines their adapter as a property. The upside of which is backwards compatibility (welcome back PhabricatorIRCBot) and perhaps a little bit clearer plugin path for homegrowners. # Logging. You'll notice I commented out two very important logging lines in the irc adapter. This isn't intended to remain commented out, but I'm not sure what the best way is to get logging at this layer. I'm wary of just composing the daemon back down into the adapter (bi-directional object composition makes my skin crawl), but something needs to happen, obviously. Advice? That's it. After the feedback on the above, you can either merge down, or wait until i finish the command/message refactor if you don't think the diff will grow too large. Up to you, this all functions as is. Test Plan: Ran an irc bot, connected, read input, and wrote output including handler integration. Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley CC: aran, Korvin Maniphest Tasks: T2462 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4757
2013-02-06 03:45:20 +01:00
'PhabricatorBotDebugLogHandler' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/handler/PhabricatorBotDebugLogHandler.php',
'PhabricatorBotFeedNotificationHandler' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/handler/PhabricatorBotFeedNotificationHandler.php',
'PhabricatorBotFlowdockProtocolAdapter' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/adapter/PhabricatorBotFlowdockProtocolAdapter.php',
First pass at decoupling Phabricator bot behavior from the protocol it's running on, this pulls the connection, reading, and writing functionalities out of the bot itself and into the adapter. Summary: Ugh, just wrote out a huge message, only to lose it with a fat-fingered ctrl-c. Le sigh. First pass at decoupling the bot from the protocol. Noticeably absent is the command/message coupling. After this design pass I'll give that a go. Could use some advice, thinking that handlers should only create messages (which can be public or private) and not open ended, undefined 'commands'. The problem being that there needs to be some consistant api if we want handlers to be protocol agnostic. Perhaps that's a pipedream, what are your thoughts? Secondly, a few notes, design review requests on the changes i did make: # Config. For now i'm passing config through to the adapter. This was mainly to remain backwards compatible on the config. I was thinking it should probably be namespaced into it's own subobject though to distinguish the adapter config from the bot config. # Adapter selection. This flavor is the one-bot-daemon, config specified protocol version. The upside is that in the future they won't have to run different daemons for this stuff, just have different config, and the door is open for multiple protocol adapters down the road if need be. The downside is that I had to rename the daemon (non-backwards compatible change) and there will need to be some sort of runtime evaluation for instatiation of the adapter. For now I just have a crude switch, but I was thinking of just taking the string they supply as the class name (ala `try { new $clasName(); } catch...`) so as to allow for homegrown adapters, but I wasn't sure how such runtime magic would go over. Also, an alternative would be to make the PhabricatorBot class a non-abstract non-final base class and have the adapters be accompanied by a bot class that just defines their adapter as a property. The upside of which is backwards compatibility (welcome back PhabricatorIRCBot) and perhaps a little bit clearer plugin path for homegrowners. # Logging. You'll notice I commented out two very important logging lines in the irc adapter. This isn't intended to remain commented out, but I'm not sure what the best way is to get logging at this layer. I'm wary of just composing the daemon back down into the adapter (bi-directional object composition makes my skin crawl), but something needs to happen, obviously. Advice? That's it. After the feedback on the above, you can either merge down, or wait until i finish the command/message refactor if you don't think the diff will grow too large. Up to you, this all functions as is. Test Plan: Ran an irc bot, connected, read input, and wrote output including handler integration. Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley CC: aran, Korvin Maniphest Tasks: T2462 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4757
2013-02-06 03:45:20 +01:00
'PhabricatorBotHandler' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/handler/PhabricatorBotHandler.php',
'PhabricatorBotLogHandler' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/handler/PhabricatorBotLogHandler.php',
'PhabricatorBotMacroHandler' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/handler/PhabricatorBotMacroHandler.php',
'PhabricatorBotMessage' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/PhabricatorBotMessage.php',
'PhabricatorBotObjectNameHandler' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/handler/PhabricatorBotObjectNameHandler.php',
'PhabricatorBotSymbolHandler' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/handler/PhabricatorBotSymbolHandler.php',
'PhabricatorBotTarget' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/target/PhabricatorBotTarget.php',
'PhabricatorBotUser' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/target/PhabricatorBotUser.php',
First pass at decoupling Phabricator bot behavior from the protocol it's running on, this pulls the connection, reading, and writing functionalities out of the bot itself and into the adapter. Summary: Ugh, just wrote out a huge message, only to lose it with a fat-fingered ctrl-c. Le sigh. First pass at decoupling the bot from the protocol. Noticeably absent is the command/message coupling. After this design pass I'll give that a go. Could use some advice, thinking that handlers should only create messages (which can be public or private) and not open ended, undefined 'commands'. The problem being that there needs to be some consistant api if we want handlers to be protocol agnostic. Perhaps that's a pipedream, what are your thoughts? Secondly, a few notes, design review requests on the changes i did make: # Config. For now i'm passing config through to the adapter. This was mainly to remain backwards compatible on the config. I was thinking it should probably be namespaced into it's own subobject though to distinguish the adapter config from the bot config. # Adapter selection. This flavor is the one-bot-daemon, config specified protocol version. The upside is that in the future they won't have to run different daemons for this stuff, just have different config, and the door is open for multiple protocol adapters down the road if need be. The downside is that I had to rename the daemon (non-backwards compatible change) and there will need to be some sort of runtime evaluation for instatiation of the adapter. For now I just have a crude switch, but I was thinking of just taking the string they supply as the class name (ala `try { new $clasName(); } catch...`) so as to allow for homegrown adapters, but I wasn't sure how such runtime magic would go over. Also, an alternative would be to make the PhabricatorBot class a non-abstract non-final base class and have the adapters be accompanied by a bot class that just defines their adapter as a property. The upside of which is backwards compatibility (welcome back PhabricatorIRCBot) and perhaps a little bit clearer plugin path for homegrowners. # Logging. You'll notice I commented out two very important logging lines in the irc adapter. This isn't intended to remain commented out, but I'm not sure what the best way is to get logging at this layer. I'm wary of just composing the daemon back down into the adapter (bi-directional object composition makes my skin crawl), but something needs to happen, obviously. Advice? That's it. After the feedback on the above, you can either merge down, or wait until i finish the command/message refactor if you don't think the diff will grow too large. Up to you, this all functions as is. Test Plan: Ran an irc bot, connected, read input, and wrote output including handler integration. Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley CC: aran, Korvin Maniphest Tasks: T2462 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4757
2013-02-06 03:45:20 +01:00
'PhabricatorBotWhatsNewHandler' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/handler/PhabricatorBotWhatsNewHandler.php',
'PhabricatorBritishEnglishTranslation' => 'infrastructure/internationalization/translation/PhabricatorBritishEnglishTranslation.php',
'PhabricatorBuiltinPatchList' => 'infrastructure/storage/patch/PhabricatorBuiltinPatchList.php',
'PhabricatorBusyUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PhabricatorBusyUIExample.php',
Add a generic multistep Markup cache Summary: The immediate issue this addresses is T1366, adding a rendering cache to Phriction. For wiki pages with code blocks especially, rerendering them each time is expensive. The broader issue is that out markup caches aren't very good right now. They have three major problems: **Problem 1: the data is stored in the wrong place.** We currently store remarkup caches on objects. This means we're always loading it and passing it around even when we don't need it, can't genericize cache management code (e.g., have one simple script to drop/GC caches), need to update authoritative rows to clear caches, and can't genericize rendering code since each object is different. To solve this, I created a dedicated cache database that I plan to move all markup caches to use. **Problem 2: time-variant rules break when cached.** Some rules like `**bold**` are time-invariant and always produce the same output, but some rules like `{Tnnn}` and `@username` are variant and may render differently (because a task was closed or a user is on vacation). Currently, we cache the raw output, so these time-variant rules get locked at whatever values they had when they were first rendered. This is the main reason Phriction doesn't have a cache right now -- I wanted `{Tnnn}` rules to reflect open/closed tasks. To solve this, I split markup into a "preprocessing" phase (which does all the parsing and evaluates all time-invariant rules) and a "postprocessing" phase (which evaluates time-variant rules only). The preprocessing phase is most of the expense (and, notably, includes syntax highlighting) so this is nearly as good as caching the final output. I did most of the work here in D737 / D738, but we never moved to use it in Phabricator -- we currently just do the two operations serially in all cases. This diff splits them apart and caches the output of preprocessing only, so we benefit from caching but also get accurate time-variant rendering. **Problem 3: cache access isn't batched/pipelined optimally.** When we're rendering a list of markup blocks, we should be able to batch datafetching better than we do. D738 helped with this (fetching is batched within a single hunk of markup) and this improves batching on cache access. We could still do better here, but this is at least a step forward. Also fixes a bug with generating a link in the Phriction history interface ($uri gets clobbered). I'm using PHP serialization instead of JSON serialization because Remarkup does some stuff with non-ascii characters that might not survive JSON. Test Plan: - Created a Phriction document and verified that previews don't go to cache (no rows appear in the cache table). - Verified that published documents come out of cache. - Verified that caches generate/regenerate correctly, time-variant rules render properly and old documents hit the right caches. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1366 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2945
2012-07-10 00:20:56 +02:00
'PhabricatorCacheDAO' => 'applications/cache/storage/PhabricatorCacheDAO.php',
'PhabricatorCacheGeneralGarbageCollector' => 'applications/cache/garbagecollector/PhabricatorCacheGeneralGarbageCollector.php',
'PhabricatorCacheManagementPurgeWorkflow' => 'applications/cache/management/PhabricatorCacheManagementPurgeWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorCacheManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/cache/management/PhabricatorCacheManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorCacheMarkupGarbageCollector' => 'applications/cache/garbagecollector/PhabricatorCacheMarkupGarbageCollector.php',
'PhabricatorCacheSchemaSpec' => 'applications/cache/storage/PhabricatorCacheSchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorCacheSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorCacheSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorCacheSpec' => 'applications/cache/spec/PhabricatorCacheSpec.php',
'PhabricatorCacheTTLGarbageCollector' => 'applications/cache/garbagecollector/PhabricatorCacheTTLGarbageCollector.php',
2012-12-25 15:09:51 +01:00
'PhabricatorCaches' => 'applications/cache/PhabricatorCaches.php',
'PhabricatorCachesTestCase' => 'applications/cache/__tests__/PhabricatorCachesTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarApplication' => 'applications/calendar/application/PhabricatorCalendarApplication.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarController' => 'applications/calendar/controller/PhabricatorCalendarController.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarDAO' => 'applications/calendar/storage/PhabricatorCalendarDAO.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEvent' => 'applications/calendar/storage/PhabricatorCalendarEvent.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventCancelController' => 'applications/calendar/controller/PhabricatorCalendarEventCancelController.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventCommentController' => 'applications/calendar/controller/PhabricatorCalendarEventCommentController.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventDragController' => 'applications/calendar/controller/PhabricatorCalendarEventDragController.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventEditController' => 'applications/calendar/controller/PhabricatorCalendarEventEditController.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventEditIconController' => 'applications/calendar/controller/PhabricatorCalendarEventEditIconController.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventEditor' => 'applications/calendar/editor/PhabricatorCalendarEventEditor.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventEmailCommand' => 'applications/calendar/command/PhabricatorCalendarEventEmailCommand.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventInvitee' => 'applications/calendar/storage/PhabricatorCalendarEventInvitee.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventInviteeQuery' => 'applications/calendar/query/PhabricatorCalendarEventInviteeQuery.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventJoinController' => 'applications/calendar/controller/PhabricatorCalendarEventJoinController.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventListController' => 'applications/calendar/controller/PhabricatorCalendarEventListController.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventMailReceiver' => 'applications/calendar/mail/PhabricatorCalendarEventMailReceiver.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventPHIDType' => 'applications/calendar/phid/PhabricatorCalendarEventPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventQuery' => 'applications/calendar/query/PhabricatorCalendarEventQuery.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventRSVPEmailCommand' => 'applications/calendar/command/PhabricatorCalendarEventRSVPEmailCommand.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventSearchEngine' => 'applications/calendar/query/PhabricatorCalendarEventSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventSearchIndexer' => 'applications/calendar/search/PhabricatorCalendarEventSearchIndexer.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventTransaction' => 'applications/calendar/storage/PhabricatorCalendarEventTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventTransactionComment' => 'applications/calendar/storage/PhabricatorCalendarEventTransactionComment.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventTransactionQuery' => 'applications/calendar/query/PhabricatorCalendarEventTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventViewController' => 'applications/calendar/controller/PhabricatorCalendarEventViewController.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarHoliday' => 'applications/calendar/storage/PhabricatorCalendarHoliday.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarHolidayTestCase' => 'applications/calendar/storage/__tests__/PhabricatorCalendarHolidayTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarIcon' => 'applications/calendar/icon/PhabricatorCalendarIcon.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarRemarkupRule' => 'applications/calendar/remarkup/PhabricatorCalendarRemarkupRule.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarReplyHandler' => 'applications/calendar/mail/PhabricatorCalendarReplyHandler.php',
'PhabricatorCalendarSchemaSpec' => 'applications/calendar/storage/PhabricatorCalendarSchemaSpec.php',
First (rough) pass at campfire protocol adapter for bot. Summary: Decided the best approach for refactoring the message/command stuff would be to actually start implementing the campfire adapter to get a better idea of what the abstractions should look like. It feels awkward and unwieldy trying to maintain the irc command interface (notice the message instantiation in the `processReadBuffer()` method. However, i'm still not clear what the best approach is without requiring a re-write of nearly all the existing handlers and defining essentially a custom dsl on top of irc's. I suppose given that alternative, implementing to irc's dsl doesn't sound all that bad. Just feels like poor coupling. Also, I know that there is some http stuff in libphutil's futures library, but the https future is shit and I need to do some custom curlopt stuff I wasn't sure how to do with that. But if you think this should be refactored, let me know. I tested this with the ObjectHandler (messages with DXXX initiate the bot to respond with the title/link just as with irc), but beyond that, I haven't tried any of the other handlers, so if there are complications you think i'm going to run into, just let me know (this is one of the reasons for requesting review early on). Also, this diff is against my last one, even though that hasn't been merged down yet. It was starting to get large and I'd prefer to keep to two conversations separate. Fixing some lint issues. Test Plan: Ran the bot with the Object Handler in campfire and observed it behaving properly. Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley CC: aran, Korvin Maniphest Tasks: T2462 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4830
2013-02-07 15:31:29 +01:00
'PhabricatorCampfireProtocolAdapter' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/adapter/PhabricatorCampfireProtocolAdapter.php',
'PhabricatorCelerityApplication' => 'applications/celerity/application/PhabricatorCelerityApplication.php',
'PhabricatorCelerityTestCase' => '__tests__/PhabricatorCelerityTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorChangeParserTestCase' => 'applications/repository/worker/__tests__/PhabricatorChangeParserTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorChangesetResponse' => 'infrastructure/diff/PhabricatorChangesetResponse.php',
'PhabricatorChatLogApplication' => 'applications/chatlog/application/PhabricatorChatLogApplication.php',
'PhabricatorChatLogChannel' => 'applications/chatlog/storage/PhabricatorChatLogChannel.php',
'PhabricatorChatLogChannelListController' => 'applications/chatlog/controller/PhabricatorChatLogChannelListController.php',
'PhabricatorChatLogChannelLogController' => 'applications/chatlog/controller/PhabricatorChatLogChannelLogController.php',
'PhabricatorChatLogChannelQuery' => 'applications/chatlog/query/PhabricatorChatLogChannelQuery.php',
'PhabricatorChatLogController' => 'applications/chatlog/controller/PhabricatorChatLogController.php',
'PhabricatorChatLogDAO' => 'applications/chatlog/storage/PhabricatorChatLogDAO.php',
'PhabricatorChatLogEvent' => 'applications/chatlog/storage/PhabricatorChatLogEvent.php',
'PhabricatorChatLogQuery' => 'applications/chatlog/query/PhabricatorChatLogQuery.php',
Add a chunking storage engine for files Summary: Ref T7149. This isn't complete and isn't active yet, but does basically work. I'll shore it up in the next few diffs. The new workflow goes like this: > Client, file.allocate(): I'd like to upload a file with length L, metadata M, and hash H. Then the server returns `upload` (a boolean) and `filePHID` (a PHID). These mean: | upload | filePHID | means | |---|---|---| | false | false | Server can't accept file. | false | true | File data already known, file created from hash. | true | false | Just upload normally. | true | true | Query chunks to start or resume a chunked upload. All but the last case are uninteresting and work like exising uploads with `file.uploadhash` (which we can eventually deprecate). In the last case: > Client, file.querychunks(): Give me a list of chunks that I should upload. This returns all the chunks for the file. Chunks have a start byte, an end byte, and a "complete" flag to indicate that the server already has the data. Then, the client fills in chunks by sending them: > Client, file.uploadchunk(): Here is the data for one chunk. This stuff doesn't work yet or has some caveats: - I haven't tested resume much. - Files need an "isPartial()" flag for partial uploads, and the UI needs to respect it. - The JS client needs to become chunk-aware. - Chunk size is set crazy low to make testing easier. - Some debugging flags that I'll remove soon-ish. - Downloading works, but still streams the whole file into memory. - This storage engine is disabled by default (hardcoded as a unit test engine) because it's still sketchy. - Need some code to remove the "isParital" flag when the last chunk is uploaded. - Maybe do checksumming on chunks. Test Plan: - Hacked up `arc upload` (see next diff) to be chunk-aware and uploaded a readme in 18 32-byte chunks. Then downloaded it. Got the same file back that I uploaded. - File UI now shows some basic chunk info for chunked files: {F336434} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7149 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12060
2015-03-13 19:30:02 +01:00
'PhabricatorChunkedFileStorageEngine' => 'applications/files/engine/PhabricatorChunkedFileStorageEngine.php',
'PhabricatorClusterConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorClusterConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorCommentEditEngineExtension' => 'applications/transactions/editengineextension/PhabricatorCommentEditEngineExtension.php',
'PhabricatorCommentEditField' => 'applications/transactions/editfield/PhabricatorCommentEditField.php',
'PhabricatorCommentEditType' => 'applications/transactions/edittype/PhabricatorCommentEditType.php',
'PhabricatorCommitBranchesField' => 'applications/repository/customfield/PhabricatorCommitBranchesField.php',
'PhabricatorCommitCustomField' => 'applications/repository/customfield/PhabricatorCommitCustomField.php',
'PhabricatorCommitMergedCommitsField' => 'applications/repository/customfield/PhabricatorCommitMergedCommitsField.php',
'PhabricatorCommitRepositoryField' => 'applications/repository/customfield/PhabricatorCommitRepositoryField.php',
'PhabricatorCommitSearchEngine' => 'applications/audit/query/PhabricatorCommitSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorCommitTagsField' => 'applications/repository/customfield/PhabricatorCommitTagsField.php',
'PhabricatorCommonPasswords' => 'applications/auth/constants/PhabricatorCommonPasswords.php',
'PhabricatorConduitAPIController' => 'applications/conduit/controller/PhabricatorConduitAPIController.php',
'PhabricatorConduitApplication' => 'applications/conduit/application/PhabricatorConduitApplication.php',
'PhabricatorConduitCertificateToken' => 'applications/conduit/storage/PhabricatorConduitCertificateToken.php',
'PhabricatorConduitConnectionLog' => 'applications/conduit/storage/PhabricatorConduitConnectionLog.php',
'PhabricatorConduitConsoleController' => 'applications/conduit/controller/PhabricatorConduitConsoleController.php',
'PhabricatorConduitController' => 'applications/conduit/controller/PhabricatorConduitController.php',
'PhabricatorConduitDAO' => 'applications/conduit/storage/PhabricatorConduitDAO.php',
'PhabricatorConduitListController' => 'applications/conduit/controller/PhabricatorConduitListController.php',
'PhabricatorConduitLogController' => 'applications/conduit/controller/PhabricatorConduitLogController.php',
'PhabricatorConduitLogQuery' => 'applications/conduit/query/PhabricatorConduitLogQuery.php',
'PhabricatorConduitMethodCallLog' => 'applications/conduit/storage/PhabricatorConduitMethodCallLog.php',
'PhabricatorConduitMethodQuery' => 'applications/conduit/query/PhabricatorConduitMethodQuery.php',
'PhabricatorConduitRequestExceptionHandler' => 'aphront/handler/PhabricatorConduitRequestExceptionHandler.php',
'PhabricatorConduitResultInterface' => 'applications/conduit/interface/PhabricatorConduitResultInterface.php',
'PhabricatorConduitSearchEngine' => 'applications/conduit/query/PhabricatorConduitSearchEngine.php',
Accept Conduit tokens as an authentication mechanism Summary: - Ref T5955. Accept the tokens introduced in D10985 as an authentication token. - Ref T3628. Permit simple `curl`-compatible decoding of parameters. Test Plan: - Ran some sensible `curl` API commands: ``` epriestley@orbital ~/dev/phabricator $ curl -g "http://local.phacility.com/api/user.whoami?api.token=api-f7dfpoyelk4mmz6vxcueb6hcbtbk" ; echo {"result":{"phid":"PHID-USER-cvfydnwadpdj7vdon36z","userName":"admin","realName":"asdf","image":"http:\/\/local.phacility.com\/res\/1410737307T\/phabricator\/3eb28cd9\/rsrc\/image\/avatar.png","uri":"http:\/\/local.phacility.com\/p\/admin\/","roles":["admin","verified","approved","activated"]},"error_code":null,"error_info":null} ``` ``` epriestley@orbital ~/dev/phabricator $ curl -g "http://local.phacility.com/api/differential.query?api.token=api-f7dfpoyelk4mmz6vxcueb6hcbtbk&ids[]=1" ; echo {"result":[{"id":"1","phid":"PHID-DREV-v3a67ixww3ccg5lqbxee","title":"zxcb","uri":"http:\/\/local.phacility.com\/D1","dateCreated":"1418405590","dateModified":"1418405590","authorPHID":"PHID-USER-cvfydnwadpdj7vdon36z","status":"0","statusName":"Needs Review","branch":null,"summary":"","testPlan":"zxcb","lineCount":"6","activeDiffPHID":"PHID-DIFF-pzbtc5rw6pe5j2kxtlr2","diffs":["1"],"commits":[],"reviewers":[],"ccs":[],"hashes":[],"auxiliary":{"phabricator:projects":[],"phabricator:depends-on":[],"organization.sqlmigration":null},"arcanistProjectPHID":null,"repositoryPHID":null,"sourcePath":null}],"error_code":null,"error_info":null} ``` - Ran older-style commands like `arc list` against the local install. - Ran commands via web console. - Added and ran a unit test to make sure nothing is using forbidden parameter names. - Terminated a token and verified it no longer works. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3628, T5955 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10986
2014-12-15 20:14:41 +01:00
'PhabricatorConduitTestCase' => '__tests__/PhabricatorConduitTestCase.php',
Add Conduit Tokens to make authentication in Conduit somewhat more sane Summary: Ref T5955. Summary of intended changes: **Improve Granularity of Authorization**: Currently, users have one Conduit Certificate. This isn't very flexible, and means that you can't ever generate an API token with limited permissions or IP block controls (see T6706). This moves toward a world where you can generate multiple tokens, revoke them individually, and assign disparate privileges to them. **Standardize Token Management**: This moves Conduit to work the same way that sessions, OAuth authorizations, and temporary tokens already work, instead of being this crazy bizarre mess. **Make Authentication Faster**: Authentication currently requires a handshake (conduit.connect) to establish a session, like the web UI. This is unnecessary from a security point of view and puts an extra round trip in front of all Conduit activity. Essentially no other API anywhere works like this. **Make Authentication Simpler**: The handshake is complex, and involves deriving hashes. The session is also complex, and creates issues like T4377. Handshake and session management require different inputs. **Make Token Management Simpler**: The certificate is this huge long thing right now, which is not necessary from a security perspective. There are separate Arcanist handshake tokens, but they have a different set of issues. We can move forward to a token management world where neither of these problems exist. **Lower Protocol Barrier**: The simplest possible API client is very complex right now. It should be `curl`. Simplifying authentication is a necessary step toward this. **Unblock T2783**: T2783 is blocked on nodes in the cluster making authenticated API calls to other nodes. This provides a simpler way forward than the handshake mess (or enormous-hack-mess) which would currently be required. Test Plan: - Generated tokens. - Generated tokens for a bot account. - Terminated tokens (and for a bot account). - Terminated all tokens (and for a bot account). - Ran GC and saw it reap all the expired tokens. NOTE: These tokens can not actually be used to authenticate yet! {F249658} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T5955 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10985
2014-12-15 20:14:23 +01:00
'PhabricatorConduitToken' => 'applications/conduit/storage/PhabricatorConduitToken.php',
'PhabricatorConduitTokenController' => 'applications/conduit/controller/PhabricatorConduitTokenController.php',
Add Conduit Tokens to make authentication in Conduit somewhat more sane Summary: Ref T5955. Summary of intended changes: **Improve Granularity of Authorization**: Currently, users have one Conduit Certificate. This isn't very flexible, and means that you can't ever generate an API token with limited permissions or IP block controls (see T6706). This moves toward a world where you can generate multiple tokens, revoke them individually, and assign disparate privileges to them. **Standardize Token Management**: This moves Conduit to work the same way that sessions, OAuth authorizations, and temporary tokens already work, instead of being this crazy bizarre mess. **Make Authentication Faster**: Authentication currently requires a handshake (conduit.connect) to establish a session, like the web UI. This is unnecessary from a security point of view and puts an extra round trip in front of all Conduit activity. Essentially no other API anywhere works like this. **Make Authentication Simpler**: The handshake is complex, and involves deriving hashes. The session is also complex, and creates issues like T4377. Handshake and session management require different inputs. **Make Token Management Simpler**: The certificate is this huge long thing right now, which is not necessary from a security perspective. There are separate Arcanist handshake tokens, but they have a different set of issues. We can move forward to a token management world where neither of these problems exist. **Lower Protocol Barrier**: The simplest possible API client is very complex right now. It should be `curl`. Simplifying authentication is a necessary step toward this. **Unblock T2783**: T2783 is blocked on nodes in the cluster making authenticated API calls to other nodes. This provides a simpler way forward than the handshake mess (or enormous-hack-mess) which would currently be required. Test Plan: - Generated tokens. - Generated tokens for a bot account. - Terminated tokens (and for a bot account). - Terminated all tokens (and for a bot account). - Ran GC and saw it reap all the expired tokens. NOTE: These tokens can not actually be used to authenticate yet! {F249658} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T5955 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10985
2014-12-15 20:14:23 +01:00
'PhabricatorConduitTokenEditController' => 'applications/conduit/controller/PhabricatorConduitTokenEditController.php',
'PhabricatorConduitTokenHandshakeController' => 'applications/conduit/controller/PhabricatorConduitTokenHandshakeController.php',
Add Conduit Tokens to make authentication in Conduit somewhat more sane Summary: Ref T5955. Summary of intended changes: **Improve Granularity of Authorization**: Currently, users have one Conduit Certificate. This isn't very flexible, and means that you can't ever generate an API token with limited permissions or IP block controls (see T6706). This moves toward a world where you can generate multiple tokens, revoke them individually, and assign disparate privileges to them. **Standardize Token Management**: This moves Conduit to work the same way that sessions, OAuth authorizations, and temporary tokens already work, instead of being this crazy bizarre mess. **Make Authentication Faster**: Authentication currently requires a handshake (conduit.connect) to establish a session, like the web UI. This is unnecessary from a security point of view and puts an extra round trip in front of all Conduit activity. Essentially no other API anywhere works like this. **Make Authentication Simpler**: The handshake is complex, and involves deriving hashes. The session is also complex, and creates issues like T4377. Handshake and session management require different inputs. **Make Token Management Simpler**: The certificate is this huge long thing right now, which is not necessary from a security perspective. There are separate Arcanist handshake tokens, but they have a different set of issues. We can move forward to a token management world where neither of these problems exist. **Lower Protocol Barrier**: The simplest possible API client is very complex right now. It should be `curl`. Simplifying authentication is a necessary step toward this. **Unblock T2783**: T2783 is blocked on nodes in the cluster making authenticated API calls to other nodes. This provides a simpler way forward than the handshake mess (or enormous-hack-mess) which would currently be required. Test Plan: - Generated tokens. - Generated tokens for a bot account. - Terminated tokens (and for a bot account). - Terminated all tokens (and for a bot account). - Ran GC and saw it reap all the expired tokens. NOTE: These tokens can not actually be used to authenticate yet! {F249658} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T5955 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10985
2014-12-15 20:14:23 +01:00
'PhabricatorConduitTokenQuery' => 'applications/conduit/query/PhabricatorConduitTokenQuery.php',
'PhabricatorConduitTokenTerminateController' => 'applications/conduit/controller/PhabricatorConduitTokenTerminateController.php',
'PhabricatorConduitTokensSettingsPanel' => 'applications/conduit/settings/PhabricatorConduitTokensSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorConfigAllController' => 'applications/config/controller/PhabricatorConfigAllController.php',
'PhabricatorConfigApplication' => 'applications/config/application/PhabricatorConfigApplication.php',
'PhabricatorConfigCacheController' => 'applications/config/controller/PhabricatorConfigCacheController.php',
'PhabricatorConfigCollectorsModule' => 'applications/config/module/PhabricatorConfigCollectorsModule.php',
'PhabricatorConfigColumnSchema' => 'applications/config/schema/PhabricatorConfigColumnSchema.php',
'PhabricatorConfigConfigPHIDType' => 'applications/config/phid/PhabricatorConfigConfigPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorConfigController' => 'applications/config/controller/PhabricatorConfigController.php',
'PhabricatorConfigCoreSchemaSpec' => 'applications/config/schema/PhabricatorConfigCoreSchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorConfigDatabaseController' => 'applications/config/controller/PhabricatorConfigDatabaseController.php',
'PhabricatorConfigDatabaseIssueController' => 'applications/config/controller/PhabricatorConfigDatabaseIssueController.php',
'PhabricatorConfigDatabaseSchema' => 'applications/config/schema/PhabricatorConfigDatabaseSchema.php',
'PhabricatorConfigDatabaseSource' => 'infrastructure/env/PhabricatorConfigDatabaseSource.php',
'PhabricatorConfigDatabaseStatusController' => 'applications/config/controller/PhabricatorConfigDatabaseStatusController.php',
'PhabricatorConfigDefaultSource' => 'infrastructure/env/PhabricatorConfigDefaultSource.php',
'PhabricatorConfigDictionarySource' => 'infrastructure/env/PhabricatorConfigDictionarySource.php',
'PhabricatorConfigEdgeModule' => 'applications/config/module/PhabricatorConfigEdgeModule.php',
'PhabricatorConfigEditController' => 'applications/config/controller/PhabricatorConfigEditController.php',
'PhabricatorConfigEditor' => 'applications/config/editor/PhabricatorConfigEditor.php',
'PhabricatorConfigEntry' => 'applications/config/storage/PhabricatorConfigEntry.php',
'PhabricatorConfigEntryDAO' => 'applications/config/storage/PhabricatorConfigEntryDAO.php',
'PhabricatorConfigEntryQuery' => 'applications/config/query/PhabricatorConfigEntryQuery.php',
'PhabricatorConfigFileSource' => 'infrastructure/env/PhabricatorConfigFileSource.php',
'PhabricatorConfigGroupController' => 'applications/config/controller/PhabricatorConfigGroupController.php',
'PhabricatorConfigHTTPParameterTypesModule' => 'applications/config/module/PhabricatorConfigHTTPParameterTypesModule.php',
'PhabricatorConfigHistoryController' => 'applications/config/controller/PhabricatorConfigHistoryController.php',
'PhabricatorConfigIgnoreController' => 'applications/config/controller/PhabricatorConfigIgnoreController.php',
'PhabricatorConfigIssueListController' => 'applications/config/controller/PhabricatorConfigIssueListController.php',
'PhabricatorConfigIssueViewController' => 'applications/config/controller/PhabricatorConfigIssueViewController.php',
'PhabricatorConfigJSON' => 'applications/config/json/PhabricatorConfigJSON.php',
'PhabricatorConfigJSONOptionType' => 'applications/config/custom/PhabricatorConfigJSONOptionType.php',
'PhabricatorConfigKeySchema' => 'applications/config/schema/PhabricatorConfigKeySchema.php',
'PhabricatorConfigListController' => 'applications/config/controller/PhabricatorConfigListController.php',
Add a local configuration source and a non-environmental ENV config source Summary: See discussion in T2221. Before we can move configuration to the database, we have a bootstrapping problem: we need database credentials to live //somewhere// if we can't guess them (and we can only really guess localhost / root / no password). Some options for this are: - Have them live in ENV variables. - These are often somewhat unfamiliar to users. - Scripts would become a huge pain -- you'd have to dump a bunch of stuff into ENV. - Some environments have limited ability to set ENV vars. - SSH is also a pain. - Have them live in a normal config file. - This probably isn't really too awful, but: - Since we deploy/upgrade with git, we can't currently let them edit a file which already exists, or their working copy will become dirty. - So they have to copy or create a file, then edit it. - The biggest issue I have with this is that it will be difficult to give specific, easily-followed directions from Setup. The instructions need to be like "Copy template.conf.php to real.conf.php, then edit these keys: x, y, z". This isn't as easy to follow as "run script Y". - Have them live in an abnormal config file with script access (this diff). - I think this is a little better than a normal config file, because we can tell users 'run phabricator/bin/config set mysql.user phabricator' and such, which is easier to follow than editing a config file. I think this is only a marginal improvement over a normal config file and am open to arguments against this approach, but I think it will be a little easier for users to deal with than a normal config file. In most cases they should only need to store three values in this file -- db user/host/pass -- since once we have those we can bootstrap everything else. Normal config files also aren't going away for more advanced users, we're just offering a simple alternative for most users. This also adds an ENVIRONMENT file as an alternative to PHABRICATOR_ENV. This is just a simple way to specify the environment if you don't have convenient access to env vars. Test Plan: Ran `config set x y`, verified writes. Wrote to ENVIRONMENT, ran `PHABRICATOR_ENV= ./bin/repository`. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, codeblock Reviewed By: codeblock CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2221 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4294
2012-12-30 15:16:15 +01:00
'PhabricatorConfigLocalSource' => 'infrastructure/env/PhabricatorConfigLocalSource.php',
Increase the power of `bin/config` Summary: Fixes T2254. Make the CLI for config more powerful: - Add validation for `set`. - Add `get`. - Add `list`. - Add `delete`. The `get` command produces fairly verbose JSON to support flags like `--all`, or `--source database` later. The other commands are straightforward. Test Plan: Tested `config set`: $ ./bin/config set Usage Exception: Specify a configuration key and a value to set it to. $ ./bin/config set x Usage Exception: Specify a value to set the key 'x' to. $ ./bin/config set phabricator.base-uri Usage Exception: Specify a value to set the key 'phabricator.base-uri' to. $ ./bin/config set phabricator.base-uri x Usage Exception: Config option 'phabricator.base-uri' is invalid. The URI must start with 'http://' or 'https://'. $ ./bin/config set phabricator.base-uri http://x Usage Exception: Config option 'phabricator.base-uri' is invalid. The URI must contain a dot ('.'), like 'http://example.com/', not just a bare name like 'http://example/'. Some web browsers will not set cookies on domains with no TLD. $ ./bin/config set phabricator.base-uri http://x.com Set 'phabricator.base-uri' in local configuration. $ Tested `config get`: $ ./bin/config get pygments.enabled { "config" : [] } $ ./bin/config set pygments.enabled true Set 'pygments.enabled' in local configuration. $ ./bin/config get pygments.enabled { "config" : [ { "key" : "pygments.enabled", "source" : "local", "value" : true } ] } $ Tested `config delete`: $ ./bin/config delete Usage Exception: Specify a configuration key to delete. $ ./bin/config delete x x Usage Exception: Too many arguments: expected one key. $ ./bin/config delete x Usage Exception: No such configuration key 'x'! Use `config list` to list all keys. $ ./bin/config delete pygments.enabled Deleted 'pygments.enabled' from local configuration. $ ./bin/config delete pygments.enabled Usage Exception: Configuration key 'pygments.enabled' is not set in local configuration! $ Tested `config list`: $ ./bin/config list account.editable account.minimum-password-length amazon-ec2.access-key amazon-ec2.secret-key amazon-s3.access-key amazon-s3.endpoint amazon-s3.secret-key amazon-ses.access-key amazon-ses.secret-key aphront.default-application-configuration-class audit.can-author-close-audit auth.email-domains auth.login-message auth.password-auth-enabled auth.require-email-verification auth.sessions.conduit auth.sessions.web auth.sshkeys.enabled cache.enable-deflate celerity.force-disk-reads celerity.minify celerity.resource-hash celerity.resource-path config.hide config.lock config.mask controller.oauth-registration darkconsole.always-on darkconsole.enabled debug.profile-rate debug.stop-on-redirect differential.allow-reopen differential.allow-self-accept differential.always-allow-close differential.anonymous-access differential.custom-remarkup-block-rules differential.custom-remarkup-rules differential.days-fresh differential.days-stale differential.enable-email-accept differential.expose-emails-prudently differential.field-selector differential.generated-paths differential.require-test-plan-field differential.revision-custom-detail-renderer differential.show-host-field differential.show-test-plan-field differential.whitespace-matters disqus.application-id disqus.application-secret disqus.auth-enabled disqus.auth-permanent disqus.registration-enabled disqus.shortname environment.append-paths events.listeners facebook.application-id facebook.application-secret facebook.auth-enabled facebook.auth-permanent facebook.registration-enabled facebook.require-https-auth feed.http-hooks feed.public files.image-mime-types files.viewable-mime-types gcdaemon.ttl.daemon-logs gcdaemon.ttl.differential-parse-cache gcdaemon.ttl.general-cache gcdaemon.ttl.herald-transcripts gcdaemon.ttl.markup-cache gcdaemon.ttl.task-archive github.application-id github.application-secret github.auth-enabled github.auth-permanent github.registration-enabled google.application-id google.application-secret google.auth-enabled google.auth-permanent google.registration-enabled ldap.activedirectory_domain ldap.anonymous-user-name ldap.anonymous-user-password ldap.auth-enabled ldap.base_dn ldap.hostname ldap.port ldap.real_name_attributes ldap.referrals ldap.search-first ldap.search_attribute ldap.start-tls ldap.username-attribute ldap.version load-libraries log.access.format log.access.path maniphest.custom-fields maniphest.custom-task-extensions-class maniphest.default-priority maniphest.enabled metamta.can-send-as-user metamta.default-address metamta.differential.attach-patches metamta.differential.inline-patches metamta.differential.patch-format metamta.differential.reply-handler metamta.differential.reply-handler-domain metamta.differential.subject-prefix metamta.differential.unified-comment-context metamta.diffusion.attach-patches metamta.diffusion.byte-limit metamta.diffusion.inline-patches metamta.diffusion.reply-handler metamta.diffusion.reply-handler-domain metamta.diffusion.subject-prefix metamta.diffusion.time-limit metamta.domain metamta.herald.show-hints metamta.insecure-auth-with-reply-to metamta.macro.reply-handler-domain metamta.macro.subject-prefix metamta.mail-adapter metamta.maniphest.default-public-author metamta.maniphest.public-create-email metamta.maniphest.reply-handler metamta.maniphest.reply-handler-domain metamta.maniphest.subject-prefix metamta.one-mail-per-recipient metamta.package.reply-handler metamta.package.subject-prefix metamta.pholio.reply-handler-domain metamta.pholio.subject-prefix metamta.placeholder-to-recipient metamta.precedence-bulk metamta.public-replies metamta.re-prefix metamta.recipients.show-hints metamta.reply.show-hints metamta.send-immediately metamta.single-reply-handler-prefix metamta.user-address-format metamta.vary-subjects mysql.configuration-provider mysql.host mysql.implementation mysql.pass mysql.user notification.client-uri notification.debug notification.enabled notification.log notification.pidfile notification.server-uri notification.user phabricator.application-id phabricator.application-secret phabricator.auth-enabled phabricator.auth-permanent phabricator.base-uri phabricator.csrf-key phabricator.env phabricator.mail-key phabricator.oauth-uri phabricator.production-uri phabricator.registration-enabled phabricator.serious-business phabricator.setup phabricator.show-beta-applications phabricator.show-error-callout phabricator.show-stack-traces phabricator.timezone phame.skins phd.log-directory phd.pid-directory phd.start-taskmasters phd.trace phd.verbose phid.external-loaders phpmailer.mailer phpmailer.smtp-host phpmailer.smtp-password phpmailer.smtp-port phpmailer.smtp-protocol phpmailer.smtp-user phriction.enabled policy.allow-public pygments.dropdown-choices pygments.enabled recaptcha.enabled recaptcha.private-key recaptcha.public-key remarkup.enable-embedded-youtube repository.default-local-path search.elastic.host search.engine-selector security.alternate-file-domain security.hmac-key security.require-https sendgrid.api-key sendgrid.api-user storage.default-namespace storage.engine-selector storage.local-disk.path storage.mysql-engine.max-size storage.s3.bucket storage.upload-size-limit style.monospace syntax-highlighter.engine syntax.filemap test.value tokenizer.ondemand translation.override translation.provider uri.allowed-protocols $ Reviewers: btrahan, codeblock Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2254 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4570
2013-01-22 00:27:42 +01:00
'PhabricatorConfigManagementDeleteWorkflow' => 'applications/config/management/PhabricatorConfigManagementDeleteWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorConfigManagementGetWorkflow' => 'applications/config/management/PhabricatorConfigManagementGetWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorConfigManagementListWorkflow' => 'applications/config/management/PhabricatorConfigManagementListWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorConfigManagementMigrateWorkflow' => 'applications/config/management/PhabricatorConfigManagementMigrateWorkflow.php',
Increase the power of `bin/config` Summary: Fixes T2254. Make the CLI for config more powerful: - Add validation for `set`. - Add `get`. - Add `list`. - Add `delete`. The `get` command produces fairly verbose JSON to support flags like `--all`, or `--source database` later. The other commands are straightforward. Test Plan: Tested `config set`: $ ./bin/config set Usage Exception: Specify a configuration key and a value to set it to. $ ./bin/config set x Usage Exception: Specify a value to set the key 'x' to. $ ./bin/config set phabricator.base-uri Usage Exception: Specify a value to set the key 'phabricator.base-uri' to. $ ./bin/config set phabricator.base-uri x Usage Exception: Config option 'phabricator.base-uri' is invalid. The URI must start with 'http://' or 'https://'. $ ./bin/config set phabricator.base-uri http://x Usage Exception: Config option 'phabricator.base-uri' is invalid. The URI must contain a dot ('.'), like 'http://example.com/', not just a bare name like 'http://example/'. Some web browsers will not set cookies on domains with no TLD. $ ./bin/config set phabricator.base-uri http://x.com Set 'phabricator.base-uri' in local configuration. $ Tested `config get`: $ ./bin/config get pygments.enabled { "config" : [] } $ ./bin/config set pygments.enabled true Set 'pygments.enabled' in local configuration. $ ./bin/config get pygments.enabled { "config" : [ { "key" : "pygments.enabled", "source" : "local", "value" : true } ] } $ Tested `config delete`: $ ./bin/config delete Usage Exception: Specify a configuration key to delete. $ ./bin/config delete x x Usage Exception: Too many arguments: expected one key. $ ./bin/config delete x Usage Exception: No such configuration key 'x'! Use `config list` to list all keys. $ ./bin/config delete pygments.enabled Deleted 'pygments.enabled' from local configuration. $ ./bin/config delete pygments.enabled Usage Exception: Configuration key 'pygments.enabled' is not set in local configuration! $ Tested `config list`: $ ./bin/config list account.editable account.minimum-password-length amazon-ec2.access-key amazon-ec2.secret-key amazon-s3.access-key amazon-s3.endpoint amazon-s3.secret-key amazon-ses.access-key amazon-ses.secret-key aphront.default-application-configuration-class audit.can-author-close-audit auth.email-domains auth.login-message auth.password-auth-enabled auth.require-email-verification auth.sessions.conduit auth.sessions.web auth.sshkeys.enabled cache.enable-deflate celerity.force-disk-reads celerity.minify celerity.resource-hash celerity.resource-path config.hide config.lock config.mask controller.oauth-registration darkconsole.always-on darkconsole.enabled debug.profile-rate debug.stop-on-redirect differential.allow-reopen differential.allow-self-accept differential.always-allow-close differential.anonymous-access differential.custom-remarkup-block-rules differential.custom-remarkup-rules differential.days-fresh differential.days-stale differential.enable-email-accept differential.expose-emails-prudently differential.field-selector differential.generated-paths differential.require-test-plan-field differential.revision-custom-detail-renderer differential.show-host-field differential.show-test-plan-field differential.whitespace-matters disqus.application-id disqus.application-secret disqus.auth-enabled disqus.auth-permanent disqus.registration-enabled disqus.shortname environment.append-paths events.listeners facebook.application-id facebook.application-secret facebook.auth-enabled facebook.auth-permanent facebook.registration-enabled facebook.require-https-auth feed.http-hooks feed.public files.image-mime-types files.viewable-mime-types gcdaemon.ttl.daemon-logs gcdaemon.ttl.differential-parse-cache gcdaemon.ttl.general-cache gcdaemon.ttl.herald-transcripts gcdaemon.ttl.markup-cache gcdaemon.ttl.task-archive github.application-id github.application-secret github.auth-enabled github.auth-permanent github.registration-enabled google.application-id google.application-secret google.auth-enabled google.auth-permanent google.registration-enabled ldap.activedirectory_domain ldap.anonymous-user-name ldap.anonymous-user-password ldap.auth-enabled ldap.base_dn ldap.hostname ldap.port ldap.real_name_attributes ldap.referrals ldap.search-first ldap.search_attribute ldap.start-tls ldap.username-attribute ldap.version load-libraries log.access.format log.access.path maniphest.custom-fields maniphest.custom-task-extensions-class maniphest.default-priority maniphest.enabled metamta.can-send-as-user metamta.default-address metamta.differential.attach-patches metamta.differential.inline-patches metamta.differential.patch-format metamta.differential.reply-handler metamta.differential.reply-handler-domain metamta.differential.subject-prefix metamta.differential.unified-comment-context metamta.diffusion.attach-patches metamta.diffusion.byte-limit metamta.diffusion.inline-patches metamta.diffusion.reply-handler metamta.diffusion.reply-handler-domain metamta.diffusion.subject-prefix metamta.diffusion.time-limit metamta.domain metamta.herald.show-hints metamta.insecure-auth-with-reply-to metamta.macro.reply-handler-domain metamta.macro.subject-prefix metamta.mail-adapter metamta.maniphest.default-public-author metamta.maniphest.public-create-email metamta.maniphest.reply-handler metamta.maniphest.reply-handler-domain metamta.maniphest.subject-prefix metamta.one-mail-per-recipient metamta.package.reply-handler metamta.package.subject-prefix metamta.pholio.reply-handler-domain metamta.pholio.subject-prefix metamta.placeholder-to-recipient metamta.precedence-bulk metamta.public-replies metamta.re-prefix metamta.recipients.show-hints metamta.reply.show-hints metamta.send-immediately metamta.single-reply-handler-prefix metamta.user-address-format metamta.vary-subjects mysql.configuration-provider mysql.host mysql.implementation mysql.pass mysql.user notification.client-uri notification.debug notification.enabled notification.log notification.pidfile notification.server-uri notification.user phabricator.application-id phabricator.application-secret phabricator.auth-enabled phabricator.auth-permanent phabricator.base-uri phabricator.csrf-key phabricator.env phabricator.mail-key phabricator.oauth-uri phabricator.production-uri phabricator.registration-enabled phabricator.serious-business phabricator.setup phabricator.show-beta-applications phabricator.show-error-callout phabricator.show-stack-traces phabricator.timezone phame.skins phd.log-directory phd.pid-directory phd.start-taskmasters phd.trace phd.verbose phid.external-loaders phpmailer.mailer phpmailer.smtp-host phpmailer.smtp-password phpmailer.smtp-port phpmailer.smtp-protocol phpmailer.smtp-user phriction.enabled policy.allow-public pygments.dropdown-choices pygments.enabled recaptcha.enabled recaptcha.private-key recaptcha.public-key remarkup.enable-embedded-youtube repository.default-local-path search.elastic.host search.engine-selector security.alternate-file-domain security.hmac-key security.require-https sendgrid.api-key sendgrid.api-user storage.default-namespace storage.engine-selector storage.local-disk.path storage.mysql-engine.max-size storage.s3.bucket storage.upload-size-limit style.monospace syntax-highlighter.engine syntax.filemap test.value tokenizer.ondemand translation.override translation.provider uri.allowed-protocols $ Reviewers: btrahan, codeblock Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2254 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4570
2013-01-22 00:27:42 +01:00
'PhabricatorConfigManagementSetWorkflow' => 'applications/config/management/PhabricatorConfigManagementSetWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorConfigManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/config/management/PhabricatorConfigManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorConfigModule' => 'applications/config/module/PhabricatorConfigModule.php',
'PhabricatorConfigModuleController' => 'applications/config/controller/PhabricatorConfigModuleController.php',
'PhabricatorConfigOption' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorConfigOption.php',
'PhabricatorConfigOptionType' => 'applications/config/custom/PhabricatorConfigOptionType.php',
'PhabricatorConfigPHIDModule' => 'applications/config/module/PhabricatorConfigPHIDModule.php',
'PhabricatorConfigProxySource' => 'infrastructure/env/PhabricatorConfigProxySource.php',
'PhabricatorConfigPurgeCacheController' => 'applications/config/controller/PhabricatorConfigPurgeCacheController.php',
'PhabricatorConfigRequestExceptionHandlerModule' => 'applications/config/module/PhabricatorConfigRequestExceptionHandlerModule.php',
'PhabricatorConfigResponse' => 'applications/config/response/PhabricatorConfigResponse.php',
'PhabricatorConfigSchemaQuery' => 'applications/config/schema/PhabricatorConfigSchemaQuery.php',
'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec' => 'applications/config/schema/PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorConfigServerSchema' => 'applications/config/schema/PhabricatorConfigServerSchema.php',
'PhabricatorConfigSiteModule' => 'applications/config/module/PhabricatorConfigSiteModule.php',
'PhabricatorConfigSiteSource' => 'infrastructure/env/PhabricatorConfigSiteSource.php',
'PhabricatorConfigSource' => 'infrastructure/env/PhabricatorConfigSource.php',
'PhabricatorConfigStackSource' => 'infrastructure/env/PhabricatorConfigStackSource.php',
'PhabricatorConfigStorageSchema' => 'applications/config/schema/PhabricatorConfigStorageSchema.php',
'PhabricatorConfigTableSchema' => 'applications/config/schema/PhabricatorConfigTableSchema.php',
'PhabricatorConfigTransaction' => 'applications/config/storage/PhabricatorConfigTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorConfigTransactionQuery' => 'applications/config/query/PhabricatorConfigTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorConfigValidationException' => 'applications/config/exception/PhabricatorConfigValidationException.php',
'PhabricatorConfigVersionsModule' => 'applications/config/module/PhabricatorConfigVersionsModule.php',
'PhabricatorConfigWelcomeController' => 'applications/config/controller/PhabricatorConfigWelcomeController.php',
'PhabricatorConpherenceApplication' => 'applications/conpherence/application/PhabricatorConpherenceApplication.php',
'PhabricatorConpherencePreferencesSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorConpherencePreferencesSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorConpherenceThreadPHIDType' => 'applications/conpherence/phid/PhabricatorConpherenceThreadPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorConsoleApplication' => 'applications/console/application/PhabricatorConsoleApplication.php',
'PhabricatorContentSource' => 'applications/metamta/contentsource/PhabricatorContentSource.php',
'PhabricatorContentSourceView' => 'applications/metamta/contentsource/PhabricatorContentSourceView.php',
'PhabricatorContributedToObjectEdgeType' => 'applications/transactions/edges/PhabricatorContributedToObjectEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorController' => 'applications/base/controller/PhabricatorController.php',
'PhabricatorCookies' => 'applications/auth/constants/PhabricatorCookies.php',
'PhabricatorCoreConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorCoreConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorCountdown' => 'applications/countdown/storage/PhabricatorCountdown.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownApplication' => 'applications/countdown/application/PhabricatorCountdownApplication.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownCommentController' => 'applications/countdown/controller/PhabricatorCountdownCommentController.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownController' => 'applications/countdown/controller/PhabricatorCountdownController.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownCountdownPHIDType' => 'applications/countdown/phid/PhabricatorCountdownCountdownPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownDAO' => 'applications/countdown/storage/PhabricatorCountdownDAO.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownDefaultEditCapability' => 'applications/countdown/capability/PhabricatorCountdownDefaultEditCapability.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownDefaultViewCapability' => 'applications/countdown/capability/PhabricatorCountdownDefaultViewCapability.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownDeleteController' => 'applications/countdown/controller/PhabricatorCountdownDeleteController.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownEditController' => 'applications/countdown/controller/PhabricatorCountdownEditController.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownEditor' => 'applications/countdown/editor/PhabricatorCountdownEditor.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownListController' => 'applications/countdown/controller/PhabricatorCountdownListController.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownMailReceiver' => 'applications/countdown/mail/PhabricatorCountdownMailReceiver.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownQuery' => 'applications/countdown/query/PhabricatorCountdownQuery.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownRemarkupRule' => 'applications/countdown/remarkup/PhabricatorCountdownRemarkupRule.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownReplyHandler' => 'applications/countdown/mail/PhabricatorCountdownReplyHandler.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownSchemaSpec' => 'applications/countdown/storage/PhabricatorCountdownSchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownSearchEngine' => 'applications/countdown/query/PhabricatorCountdownSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownTransaction' => 'applications/countdown/storage/PhabricatorCountdownTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownTransactionComment' => 'applications/countdown/storage/PhabricatorCountdownTransactionComment.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownTransactionQuery' => 'applications/countdown/query/PhabricatorCountdownTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownView' => 'applications/countdown/view/PhabricatorCountdownView.php',
'PhabricatorCountdownViewController' => 'applications/countdown/controller/PhabricatorCountdownViewController.php',
'PhabricatorCredentialsUsedByObjectEdgeType' => 'applications/passphrase/edge/PhabricatorCredentialsUsedByObjectEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery' => 'infrastructure/query/policy/PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery.php',
Begin generalizing custom fields Summary: Ref T1703. We have currently have two custom field implementations (Maniphest, Differential) and are about to add a third (User, see D6122). I'd like to generalize custom fields before doing a third implementation, so we don't back ourselves into the ApplicationTransactions corner we have with Maniphest/Differential/Audit. For the most part, the existing custom fields work well and can be directly generalized. There are three specific things I want to improve, though: - Integration with ApplicationSearch: Custom fields aren't indexable. ApplicationSearch is now online and seems stable and good. D5278 provides a template for a backend which can integrate with ApplicationSearch, and ApplicationSearch solves many of the other UI problems implied by exposing custom fields into search (principally, giant pages full of query fields). Generally, I want to provide stronger builtin integration between custom fields and ApplicationSearch. - Integration with ApplicationTransactions: Likewise, custom fields should support more native integrations with ApplicationTransactions, which are also online and seem stable and well designed. - Selection and sorting: Selecting and sorting custom fields is a huge mess right now. I want to move this into config now that we have the UI to support it, and move away from requiring users to subclass a ton of stuff just to add a field. For ApplicationSearch, I've adopted and generalized D5278. For ApplicationTransactions, I haven't made any specific affordances yet. For selection and sorting, I've partially implemented config-based selection and sorting. It will work like this: - We add a new configuration value, like `differential.fields`. In the UI, this is a draggable list of supported fields. Fields can be reordered, and most fields can be disabled. - We load every avialable field to populate this list. New fields will appear at the bottom. - There are two downsides to this approach: - If we add fields in the upstream at a later date, they will appear at the end of the list if an install has customized list order or disabled fields, even if we insert them elsewhere in the upstream. - If we reorder fields in the upstream, the reordering will not be reflected in install which have customized the order/availability. - I think these are both acceptable costs. We only incur them if an admin edits this config, which implies they'll know how to fix it if they want to. - We can fix both of these problems with a straightforward configuration migration if we want to bother. - There are numerous upsides to this approach: - We can delete a bunch of code and replace it with simple configuration. - In general, we don't need the "selector" classes anymore. - Users can enable available-but-disabled fields with one click. - Users can add fields by putting their implementations in `src/extensions/` with zero subclassing or libphutil stuff. - Generally, it's super easy for users to understand. This doesn't actually do anything yet and will probably see some adjustments before anything starts running it. Test Plan: Static checks only, this code isn't reachable yet. Reviewers: chad, seporaitis Reviewed By: chad CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1703 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6147
2013-06-06 23:52:40 +02:00
'PhabricatorCustomField' => 'infrastructure/customfield/field/PhabricatorCustomField.php',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldAttachment' => 'infrastructure/customfield/field/PhabricatorCustomFieldAttachment.php',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldConfigOptionType' => 'infrastructure/customfield/config/PhabricatorCustomFieldConfigOptionType.php',
Begin generalizing custom fields Summary: Ref T1703. We have currently have two custom field implementations (Maniphest, Differential) and are about to add a third (User, see D6122). I'd like to generalize custom fields before doing a third implementation, so we don't back ourselves into the ApplicationTransactions corner we have with Maniphest/Differential/Audit. For the most part, the existing custom fields work well and can be directly generalized. There are three specific things I want to improve, though: - Integration with ApplicationSearch: Custom fields aren't indexable. ApplicationSearch is now online and seems stable and good. D5278 provides a template for a backend which can integrate with ApplicationSearch, and ApplicationSearch solves many of the other UI problems implied by exposing custom fields into search (principally, giant pages full of query fields). Generally, I want to provide stronger builtin integration between custom fields and ApplicationSearch. - Integration with ApplicationTransactions: Likewise, custom fields should support more native integrations with ApplicationTransactions, which are also online and seem stable and well designed. - Selection and sorting: Selecting and sorting custom fields is a huge mess right now. I want to move this into config now that we have the UI to support it, and move away from requiring users to subclass a ton of stuff just to add a field. For ApplicationSearch, I've adopted and generalized D5278. For ApplicationTransactions, I haven't made any specific affordances yet. For selection and sorting, I've partially implemented config-based selection and sorting. It will work like this: - We add a new configuration value, like `differential.fields`. In the UI, this is a draggable list of supported fields. Fields can be reordered, and most fields can be disabled. - We load every avialable field to populate this list. New fields will appear at the bottom. - There are two downsides to this approach: - If we add fields in the upstream at a later date, they will appear at the end of the list if an install has customized list order or disabled fields, even if we insert them elsewhere in the upstream. - If we reorder fields in the upstream, the reordering will not be reflected in install which have customized the order/availability. - I think these are both acceptable costs. We only incur them if an admin edits this config, which implies they'll know how to fix it if they want to. - We can fix both of these problems with a straightforward configuration migration if we want to bother. - There are numerous upsides to this approach: - We can delete a bunch of code and replace it with simple configuration. - In general, we don't need the "selector" classes anymore. - Users can enable available-but-disabled fields with one click. - Users can add fields by putting their implementations in `src/extensions/` with zero subclassing or libphutil stuff. - Generally, it's super easy for users to understand. This doesn't actually do anything yet and will probably see some adjustments before anything starts running it. Test Plan: Static checks only, this code isn't reachable yet. Reviewers: chad, seporaitis Reviewed By: chad CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1703 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6147
2013-06-06 23:52:40 +02:00
'PhabricatorCustomFieldDataNotAvailableException' => 'infrastructure/customfield/exception/PhabricatorCustomFieldDataNotAvailableException.php',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldEditEngineExtension' => 'infrastructure/customfield/engineextension/PhabricatorCustomFieldEditEngineExtension.php',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldEditField' => 'infrastructure/customfield/editor/PhabricatorCustomFieldEditField.php',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldEditType' => 'infrastructure/customfield/editor/PhabricatorCustomFieldEditType.php',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldHeraldField' => 'infrastructure/customfield/herald/PhabricatorCustomFieldHeraldField.php',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldHeraldFieldGroup' => 'infrastructure/customfield/herald/PhabricatorCustomFieldHeraldFieldGroup.php',
Begin generalizing custom fields Summary: Ref T1703. We have currently have two custom field implementations (Maniphest, Differential) and are about to add a third (User, see D6122). I'd like to generalize custom fields before doing a third implementation, so we don't back ourselves into the ApplicationTransactions corner we have with Maniphest/Differential/Audit. For the most part, the existing custom fields work well and can be directly generalized. There are three specific things I want to improve, though: - Integration with ApplicationSearch: Custom fields aren't indexable. ApplicationSearch is now online and seems stable and good. D5278 provides a template for a backend which can integrate with ApplicationSearch, and ApplicationSearch solves many of the other UI problems implied by exposing custom fields into search (principally, giant pages full of query fields). Generally, I want to provide stronger builtin integration between custom fields and ApplicationSearch. - Integration with ApplicationTransactions: Likewise, custom fields should support more native integrations with ApplicationTransactions, which are also online and seem stable and well designed. - Selection and sorting: Selecting and sorting custom fields is a huge mess right now. I want to move this into config now that we have the UI to support it, and move away from requiring users to subclass a ton of stuff just to add a field. For ApplicationSearch, I've adopted and generalized D5278. For ApplicationTransactions, I haven't made any specific affordances yet. For selection and sorting, I've partially implemented config-based selection and sorting. It will work like this: - We add a new configuration value, like `differential.fields`. In the UI, this is a draggable list of supported fields. Fields can be reordered, and most fields can be disabled. - We load every avialable field to populate this list. New fields will appear at the bottom. - There are two downsides to this approach: - If we add fields in the upstream at a later date, they will appear at the end of the list if an install has customized list order or disabled fields, even if we insert them elsewhere in the upstream. - If we reorder fields in the upstream, the reordering will not be reflected in install which have customized the order/availability. - I think these are both acceptable costs. We only incur them if an admin edits this config, which implies they'll know how to fix it if they want to. - We can fix both of these problems with a straightforward configuration migration if we want to bother. - There are numerous upsides to this approach: - We can delete a bunch of code and replace it with simple configuration. - In general, we don't need the "selector" classes anymore. - Users can enable available-but-disabled fields with one click. - Users can add fields by putting their implementations in `src/extensions/` with zero subclassing or libphutil stuff. - Generally, it's super easy for users to understand. This doesn't actually do anything yet and will probably see some adjustments before anything starts running it. Test Plan: Static checks only, this code isn't reachable yet. Reviewers: chad, seporaitis Reviewed By: chad CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1703 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6147
2013-06-06 23:52:40 +02:00
'PhabricatorCustomFieldImplementationIncompleteException' => 'infrastructure/customfield/exception/PhabricatorCustomFieldImplementationIncompleteException.php',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldIndexStorage' => 'infrastructure/customfield/storage/PhabricatorCustomFieldIndexStorage.php',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface' => 'infrastructure/customfield/interface/PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface.php',
Support configuration-driven custom fields Summary: Ref T1702. Ref T3718. There are a couple of things going on here: **PhabricatorCustomFieldList**: I added `PhabricatorCustomFieldList`, which is just a convenience class for dealing with lists of fields. Often, current field code does something like this inline in a Controller: foreach ($fields as $field) { // do some junk } Often, that junk has some slightly subtle implications. Move all of it to `$list->doSomeJunk()` methods (like `appendFieldsToForm()`, `loadFieldsFromStorage()`) to reduce code duplication and prevent errors. This additionally moves an existing list-convenience method there, out of `PhabricatorPropertyListView`. **PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage**: Adds `PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage` for storing custom field data (like "ICQ Handle", "Phone Number", "Desk", "Favorite Flower", etc). **Configuration-Driven Custom Fields**: Previously, I was thinking about doing these with interfaces, but as I thought about it more I started to dislike that approach. Instead, I built proxies into `PhabricatorCustomField`. Basically, this means that fields (like a custom, configuration-driven "Favorite Flower" field) can just use some other Field to actually provide their implementation (like a "standard" field which knows how to render text areas). The previous approach would have involed subclasssing the "standard" field and implementing an interface, but that would mean that every application would have at least two "base" fields and generally just seemed bleh as I worked through it. The cost of this approach is that we need a bunch of `proxy` junk in the base class, but that's a one-time cost and I think it simplifies all the implementations and makes them a lot less magical (e.g., all of the custom fields now extend the right base field classes). **Fixed Some Bugs**: Some of this code hadn't really been run yet and had minor bugs. Test Plan: {F54240} {F54241} {F54242} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1702, T1703, T3718 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6749
2013-08-14 17:10:16 +02:00
'PhabricatorCustomFieldList' => 'infrastructure/customfield/field/PhabricatorCustomFieldList.php',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldMonogramParser' => 'infrastructure/customfield/parser/PhabricatorCustomFieldMonogramParser.php',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldNotAttachedException' => 'infrastructure/customfield/exception/PhabricatorCustomFieldNotAttachedException.php',
Support configuration-driven custom fields Summary: Ref T1702. Ref T3718. There are a couple of things going on here: **PhabricatorCustomFieldList**: I added `PhabricatorCustomFieldList`, which is just a convenience class for dealing with lists of fields. Often, current field code does something like this inline in a Controller: foreach ($fields as $field) { // do some junk } Often, that junk has some slightly subtle implications. Move all of it to `$list->doSomeJunk()` methods (like `appendFieldsToForm()`, `loadFieldsFromStorage()`) to reduce code duplication and prevent errors. This additionally moves an existing list-convenience method there, out of `PhabricatorPropertyListView`. **PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage**: Adds `PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage` for storing custom field data (like "ICQ Handle", "Phone Number", "Desk", "Favorite Flower", etc). **Configuration-Driven Custom Fields**: Previously, I was thinking about doing these with interfaces, but as I thought about it more I started to dislike that approach. Instead, I built proxies into `PhabricatorCustomField`. Basically, this means that fields (like a custom, configuration-driven "Favorite Flower" field) can just use some other Field to actually provide their implementation (like a "standard" field which knows how to render text areas). The previous approach would have involed subclasssing the "standard" field and implementing an interface, but that would mean that every application would have at least two "base" fields and generally just seemed bleh as I worked through it. The cost of this approach is that we need a bunch of `proxy` junk in the base class, but that's a one-time cost and I think it simplifies all the implementations and makes them a lot less magical (e.g., all of the custom fields now extend the right base field classes). **Fixed Some Bugs**: Some of this code hadn't really been run yet and had minor bugs. Test Plan: {F54240} {F54241} {F54242} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1702, T1703, T3718 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6749
2013-08-14 17:10:16 +02:00
'PhabricatorCustomFieldNotProxyException' => 'infrastructure/customfield/exception/PhabricatorCustomFieldNotProxyException.php',
Begin generalizing custom fields Summary: Ref T1703. We have currently have two custom field implementations (Maniphest, Differential) and are about to add a third (User, see D6122). I'd like to generalize custom fields before doing a third implementation, so we don't back ourselves into the ApplicationTransactions corner we have with Maniphest/Differential/Audit. For the most part, the existing custom fields work well and can be directly generalized. There are three specific things I want to improve, though: - Integration with ApplicationSearch: Custom fields aren't indexable. ApplicationSearch is now online and seems stable and good. D5278 provides a template for a backend which can integrate with ApplicationSearch, and ApplicationSearch solves many of the other UI problems implied by exposing custom fields into search (principally, giant pages full of query fields). Generally, I want to provide stronger builtin integration between custom fields and ApplicationSearch. - Integration with ApplicationTransactions: Likewise, custom fields should support more native integrations with ApplicationTransactions, which are also online and seem stable and well designed. - Selection and sorting: Selecting and sorting custom fields is a huge mess right now. I want to move this into config now that we have the UI to support it, and move away from requiring users to subclass a ton of stuff just to add a field. For ApplicationSearch, I've adopted and generalized D5278. For ApplicationTransactions, I haven't made any specific affordances yet. For selection and sorting, I've partially implemented config-based selection and sorting. It will work like this: - We add a new configuration value, like `differential.fields`. In the UI, this is a draggable list of supported fields. Fields can be reordered, and most fields can be disabled. - We load every avialable field to populate this list. New fields will appear at the bottom. - There are two downsides to this approach: - If we add fields in the upstream at a later date, they will appear at the end of the list if an install has customized list order or disabled fields, even if we insert them elsewhere in the upstream. - If we reorder fields in the upstream, the reordering will not be reflected in install which have customized the order/availability. - I think these are both acceptable costs. We only incur them if an admin edits this config, which implies they'll know how to fix it if they want to. - We can fix both of these problems with a straightforward configuration migration if we want to bother. - There are numerous upsides to this approach: - We can delete a bunch of code and replace it with simple configuration. - In general, we don't need the "selector" classes anymore. - Users can enable available-but-disabled fields with one click. - Users can add fields by putting their implementations in `src/extensions/` with zero subclassing or libphutil stuff. - Generally, it's super easy for users to understand. This doesn't actually do anything yet and will probably see some adjustments before anything starts running it. Test Plan: Static checks only, this code isn't reachable yet. Reviewers: chad, seporaitis Reviewed By: chad CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1703 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6147
2013-06-06 23:52:40 +02:00
'PhabricatorCustomFieldNumericIndexStorage' => 'infrastructure/customfield/storage/PhabricatorCustomFieldNumericIndexStorage.php',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldSearchEngineExtension' => 'infrastructure/customfield/engineextension/PhabricatorCustomFieldSearchEngineExtension.php',
Begin generalizing custom fields Summary: Ref T1703. We have currently have two custom field implementations (Maniphest, Differential) and are about to add a third (User, see D6122). I'd like to generalize custom fields before doing a third implementation, so we don't back ourselves into the ApplicationTransactions corner we have with Maniphest/Differential/Audit. For the most part, the existing custom fields work well and can be directly generalized. There are three specific things I want to improve, though: - Integration with ApplicationSearch: Custom fields aren't indexable. ApplicationSearch is now online and seems stable and good. D5278 provides a template for a backend which can integrate with ApplicationSearch, and ApplicationSearch solves many of the other UI problems implied by exposing custom fields into search (principally, giant pages full of query fields). Generally, I want to provide stronger builtin integration between custom fields and ApplicationSearch. - Integration with ApplicationTransactions: Likewise, custom fields should support more native integrations with ApplicationTransactions, which are also online and seem stable and well designed. - Selection and sorting: Selecting and sorting custom fields is a huge mess right now. I want to move this into config now that we have the UI to support it, and move away from requiring users to subclass a ton of stuff just to add a field. For ApplicationSearch, I've adopted and generalized D5278. For ApplicationTransactions, I haven't made any specific affordances yet. For selection and sorting, I've partially implemented config-based selection and sorting. It will work like this: - We add a new configuration value, like `differential.fields`. In the UI, this is a draggable list of supported fields. Fields can be reordered, and most fields can be disabled. - We load every avialable field to populate this list. New fields will appear at the bottom. - There are two downsides to this approach: - If we add fields in the upstream at a later date, they will appear at the end of the list if an install has customized list order or disabled fields, even if we insert them elsewhere in the upstream. - If we reorder fields in the upstream, the reordering will not be reflected in install which have customized the order/availability. - I think these are both acceptable costs. We only incur them if an admin edits this config, which implies they'll know how to fix it if they want to. - We can fix both of these problems with a straightforward configuration migration if we want to bother. - There are numerous upsides to this approach: - We can delete a bunch of code and replace it with simple configuration. - In general, we don't need the "selector" classes anymore. - Users can enable available-but-disabled fields with one click. - Users can add fields by putting their implementations in `src/extensions/` with zero subclassing or libphutil stuff. - Generally, it's super easy for users to understand. This doesn't actually do anything yet and will probably see some adjustments before anything starts running it. Test Plan: Static checks only, this code isn't reachable yet. Reviewers: chad, seporaitis Reviewed By: chad CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1703 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6147
2013-06-06 23:52:40 +02:00
'PhabricatorCustomFieldStorage' => 'infrastructure/customfield/storage/PhabricatorCustomFieldStorage.php',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldStringIndexStorage' => 'infrastructure/customfield/storage/PhabricatorCustomFieldStringIndexStorage.php',
'PhabricatorCustomHeaderConfigType' => 'applications/config/custom/PhabricatorCustomHeaderConfigType.php',
'PhabricatorDaemon' => 'infrastructure/daemon/PhabricatorDaemon.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonBulkJobListController' => 'applications/daemon/controller/PhabricatorDaemonBulkJobListController.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonBulkJobMonitorController' => 'applications/daemon/controller/PhabricatorDaemonBulkJobMonitorController.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonBulkJobViewController' => 'applications/daemon/controller/PhabricatorDaemonBulkJobViewController.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonConsoleController' => 'applications/daemon/controller/PhabricatorDaemonConsoleController.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonController' => 'applications/daemon/controller/PhabricatorDaemonController.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonDAO' => 'applications/daemon/storage/PhabricatorDaemonDAO.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonEventListener' => 'applications/daemon/event/PhabricatorDaemonEventListener.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonLog' => 'applications/daemon/storage/PhabricatorDaemonLog.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonLogEvent' => 'applications/daemon/storage/PhabricatorDaemonLogEvent.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonLogEventGarbageCollector' => 'applications/daemon/garbagecollector/PhabricatorDaemonLogEventGarbageCollector.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonLogEventViewController' => 'applications/daemon/controller/PhabricatorDaemonLogEventViewController.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonLogEventsView' => 'applications/daemon/view/PhabricatorDaemonLogEventsView.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonLogGarbageCollector' => 'applications/daemon/garbagecollector/PhabricatorDaemonLogGarbageCollector.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonLogListController' => 'applications/daemon/controller/PhabricatorDaemonLogListController.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonLogListView' => 'applications/daemon/view/PhabricatorDaemonLogListView.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonLogQuery' => 'applications/daemon/query/PhabricatorDaemonLogQuery.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonLogViewController' => 'applications/daemon/controller/PhabricatorDaemonLogViewController.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementDebugWorkflow' => 'applications/daemon/management/PhabricatorDaemonManagementDebugWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementLaunchWorkflow' => 'applications/daemon/management/PhabricatorDaemonManagementLaunchWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementListWorkflow' => 'applications/daemon/management/PhabricatorDaemonManagementListWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementLogWorkflow' => 'applications/daemon/management/PhabricatorDaemonManagementLogWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementReloadWorkflow' => 'applications/daemon/management/PhabricatorDaemonManagementReloadWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementRestartWorkflow' => 'applications/daemon/management/PhabricatorDaemonManagementRestartWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementStartWorkflow' => 'applications/daemon/management/PhabricatorDaemonManagementStartWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementStatusWorkflow' => 'applications/daemon/management/PhabricatorDaemonManagementStatusWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementStopWorkflow' => 'applications/daemon/management/PhabricatorDaemonManagementStopWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/daemon/management/PhabricatorDaemonManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonOverseerModule' => 'infrastructure/daemon/overseer/PhabricatorDaemonOverseerModule.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonReference' => 'infrastructure/daemon/control/PhabricatorDaemonReference.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonTaskGarbageCollector' => 'applications/daemon/garbagecollector/PhabricatorDaemonTaskGarbageCollector.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonTasksTableView' => 'applications/daemon/view/PhabricatorDaemonTasksTableView.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonsApplication' => 'applications/daemon/application/PhabricatorDaemonsApplication.php',
'PhabricatorDaemonsSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorDaemonsSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorDailyRoutineTriggerClock' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/clock/PhabricatorDailyRoutineTriggerClock.php',
'PhabricatorDashboard' => 'applications/dashboard/storage/PhabricatorDashboard.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardAddPanelController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardAddPanelController.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardApplication' => 'applications/dashboard/application/PhabricatorDashboardApplication.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardArchiveController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardArchiveController.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardController.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardCopyController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardCopyController.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardDAO' => 'applications/dashboard/storage/PhabricatorDashboardDAO.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardDashboardHasPanelEdgeType' => 'applications/dashboard/edge/PhabricatorDashboardDashboardHasPanelEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardDashboardPHIDType' => 'applications/dashboard/phid/PhabricatorDashboardDashboardPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardEditController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardEditController.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardHistoryController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardHistoryController.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardInstall' => 'applications/dashboard/storage/PhabricatorDashboardInstall.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardInstallController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardInstallController.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardLayoutConfig' => 'applications/dashboard/layoutconfig/PhabricatorDashboardLayoutConfig.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardListController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardListController.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardManageController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardManageController.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardMovePanelController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardMovePanelController.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanel' => 'applications/dashboard/storage/PhabricatorDashboardPanel.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelArchiveController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardPanelArchiveController.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelCoreCustomField' => 'applications/dashboard/customfield/PhabricatorDashboardPanelCoreCustomField.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelCustomField' => 'applications/dashboard/customfield/PhabricatorDashboardPanelCustomField.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelEditController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardPanelEditController.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelHasDashboardEdgeType' => 'applications/dashboard/edge/PhabricatorDashboardPanelHasDashboardEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelListController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardPanelListController.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelPHIDType' => 'applications/dashboard/phid/PhabricatorDashboardPanelPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelQuery' => 'applications/dashboard/query/PhabricatorDashboardPanelQuery.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelRenderController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardPanelRenderController.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelRenderingEngine' => 'applications/dashboard/engine/PhabricatorDashboardPanelRenderingEngine.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelSearchApplicationCustomField' => 'applications/dashboard/customfield/PhabricatorDashboardPanelSearchApplicationCustomField.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelSearchEngine' => 'applications/dashboard/query/PhabricatorDashboardPanelSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelSearchQueryCustomField' => 'applications/dashboard/customfield/PhabricatorDashboardPanelSearchQueryCustomField.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelTabsCustomField' => 'applications/dashboard/customfield/PhabricatorDashboardPanelTabsCustomField.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelTransaction' => 'applications/dashboard/storage/PhabricatorDashboardPanelTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelTransactionEditor' => 'applications/dashboard/editor/PhabricatorDashboardPanelTransactionEditor.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelTransactionQuery' => 'applications/dashboard/query/PhabricatorDashboardPanelTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelType' => 'applications/dashboard/paneltype/PhabricatorDashboardPanelType.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelViewController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardPanelViewController.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardQuery' => 'applications/dashboard/query/PhabricatorDashboardQuery.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardQueryPanelType' => 'applications/dashboard/paneltype/PhabricatorDashboardQueryPanelType.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardRemarkupRule' => 'applications/dashboard/remarkup/PhabricatorDashboardRemarkupRule.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardRemovePanelController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardRemovePanelController.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardRenderingEngine' => 'applications/dashboard/engine/PhabricatorDashboardRenderingEngine.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardSchemaSpec' => 'applications/dashboard/storage/PhabricatorDashboardSchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardSearchEngine' => 'applications/dashboard/query/PhabricatorDashboardSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardTabsPanelType' => 'applications/dashboard/paneltype/PhabricatorDashboardTabsPanelType.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardTextPanelType' => 'applications/dashboard/paneltype/PhabricatorDashboardTextPanelType.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardTransaction' => 'applications/dashboard/storage/PhabricatorDashboardTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardTransactionEditor' => 'applications/dashboard/editor/PhabricatorDashboardTransactionEditor.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardTransactionQuery' => 'applications/dashboard/query/PhabricatorDashboardTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardUninstallController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardUninstallController.php',
'PhabricatorDashboardViewController' => 'applications/dashboard/controller/PhabricatorDashboardViewController.php',
'PhabricatorDataCacheSpec' => 'applications/cache/spec/PhabricatorDataCacheSpec.php',
'PhabricatorDataNotAttachedException' => 'infrastructure/storage/lisk/PhabricatorDataNotAttachedException.php',
'PhabricatorDatabaseSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorDatabaseSetupCheck.php',
Implement a basic version of ApplicationEditor in Paste Summary: Ref T9132. Ref T4768. This is a rough v0 of ApplicationEditor, which replaces the edit workflow in Paste. This mostly looks and works like ApplicationSearch, and is heavily modeled on it. Roughly, we define a set of editable fields and the ApplicationEditor stuff builds everything else. This has no functional changes, except: - I removed "Fork Paste" since I don't think it's particularly useful now that pastes are editable. We could restore it if users miss it. - Subscribers are now editable. - Form field order is a little goofy (this will be fixed in a future diff). - Subscribers and projects are now race-resistant. The race-resistance works like this: instead of submitting just the new value ("subscribers=apple, dog") and doing a set operation ("set subscribers = apple, dog"), we submit the old and new values ("original=apple" + "new=apple, dog") then apply the user's changes as an add + remove ("add=dog", "remove=<none>"). This means that two users who do "Edit Paste" at around the same time and each add or remove a couple of subscribers won't overwrite each other, unless they actually add or remove the exact same subscribers (in which case their edits legitimately conflict). Previously, the last user to save would win, and whatever was in their field would overwrite the prior state, potentially losing the first user's edits. Test Plan: - Created pastes. - Created pastes via API. - Edited pastes. - Edited every field. - Opened a paste in two windows and did project/subscriber edits in each, saved in arbitrary order, had edits respected. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14390
2015-11-03 03:58:32 +01:00
'PhabricatorDatasourceEditField' => 'applications/transactions/editfield/PhabricatorDatasourceEditField.php',
'PhabricatorDatasourceEditType' => 'applications/transactions/edittype/PhabricatorDatasourceEditType.php',
'PhabricatorDateTimeSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorDateTimeSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorDebugController' => 'applications/system/controller/PhabricatorDebugController.php',
'PhabricatorDefaultRequestExceptionHandler' => 'aphront/handler/PhabricatorDefaultRequestExceptionHandler.php',
'PhabricatorDesktopNotificationsSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorDesktopNotificationsSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface' => 'applications/system/interface/PhabricatorDestructibleInterface.php',
'PhabricatorDestructionEngine' => 'applications/system/engine/PhabricatorDestructionEngine.php',
'PhabricatorDeveloperConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorDeveloperConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorDeveloperPreferencesSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorDeveloperPreferencesSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorDiffInlineCommentQuery' => 'infrastructure/diff/query/PhabricatorDiffInlineCommentQuery.php',
'PhabricatorDiffPreferencesSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorDiffPreferencesSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorDifferenceEngine' => 'infrastructure/diff/PhabricatorDifferenceEngine.php',
'PhabricatorDifferentialApplication' => 'applications/differential/application/PhabricatorDifferentialApplication.php',
'PhabricatorDifferentialConfigOptions' => 'applications/differential/config/PhabricatorDifferentialConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorDifferentialRevisionTestDataGenerator' => 'applications/differential/lipsum/PhabricatorDifferentialRevisionTestDataGenerator.php',
'PhabricatorDiffusionApplication' => 'applications/diffusion/application/PhabricatorDiffusionApplication.php',
'PhabricatorDiffusionConfigOptions' => 'applications/diffusion/config/PhabricatorDiffusionConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorDisabledUserController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorDisabledUserController.php',
'PhabricatorDisplayPreferencesSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorDisplayPreferencesSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorDisqusAuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorDisqusAuthProvider.php',
'PhabricatorDivinerApplication' => 'applications/diviner/application/PhabricatorDivinerApplication.php',
'PhabricatorDoorkeeperApplication' => 'applications/doorkeeper/application/PhabricatorDoorkeeperApplication.php',
'PhabricatorDraft' => 'applications/draft/storage/PhabricatorDraft.php',
'PhabricatorDraftDAO' => 'applications/draft/storage/PhabricatorDraftDAO.php',
'PhabricatorDrydockApplication' => 'applications/drydock/application/PhabricatorDrydockApplication.php',
'PhabricatorEdgeConfig' => 'infrastructure/edges/constants/PhabricatorEdgeConfig.php',
'PhabricatorEdgeConstants' => 'infrastructure/edges/constants/PhabricatorEdgeConstants.php',
'PhabricatorEdgeCycleException' => 'infrastructure/edges/exception/PhabricatorEdgeCycleException.php',
'PhabricatorEdgeEditType' => 'applications/transactions/edittype/PhabricatorEdgeEditType.php',
'PhabricatorEdgeEditor' => 'infrastructure/edges/editor/PhabricatorEdgeEditor.php',
'PhabricatorEdgeGraph' => 'infrastructure/edges/util/PhabricatorEdgeGraph.php',
'PhabricatorEdgeQuery' => 'infrastructure/edges/query/PhabricatorEdgeQuery.php',
'PhabricatorEdgeTestCase' => 'infrastructure/edges/__tests__/PhabricatorEdgeTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorEdgeType' => 'infrastructure/edges/type/PhabricatorEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorEdgeTypeTestCase' => 'infrastructure/edges/type/__tests__/PhabricatorEdgeTypeTestCase.php',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditEngine' => 'applications/transactions/editengine/PhabricatorEditEngine.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineAPIMethod' => 'applications/transactions/editengine/PhabricatorEditEngineAPIMethod.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfiguration' => 'applications/transactions/storage/PhabricatorEditEngineConfiguration.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationDefaultCreateController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationDefaultCreateController.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationDefaultsController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationDefaultsController.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationDisableController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationDisableController.php',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationEditController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationEditController.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationEditEngine' => 'applications/transactions/editor/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationEditEngine.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationEditor' => 'applications/transactions/editor/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationEditor.php',
Allow EditEngine forms to be marked as "edit" forms Summary: Ref T9132. Ref T9908. This attempts to move us forward on answering this question: > Which form gets used when a user clicks "Edit Task"? One answer is "the same form that was used to create the task". There are several problems with that: - The form might not exist anymore. - The user might not have permission to see it. - Some of the fields might be hidden, essentially preventing them from being edited. - We have to store the value somewhere and old tasks won't have a value. - Any instructions on the form probably don't apply to edits. One answer is "force the default, full form". That's not as problematic, but it means we have no ability to create limited access users who see fewer fields. The answer in this diff is: - Forms can be marked as "edit forms". - We take the user to the first edit form they have permission to see, from a master list. This allows you to create several forms like: - Advanced Edit Form (say, all fields -- visible to administrators). - Basic Edit Form (say, no policies -- visible to trusted users). - Noob Edit Form (say, no policies, priorities, or status -- visible to everyone). Then you can give everyone access to "noob", some people access to "basic", and a few people access to "advanced". This might only be part of the answer. In particular, you can still //use// any edit form you can see, so we could do these things in the future: - Give you an option to switch to a different form if you want. - Save the form the task was created with, and use that form by default. If we do pursue those, we can fall back to this behavior if there's a problem with them (e.g., original form doesn't exist or wasn't recorded). There's also no "reorder" UI yet, that'll be coming in the next diff. I'm also going to try to probably make the "create" and "edit" stuff a little more consistent / less weird in a bit. Test Plan: Marked various forms as edit forms or not edit forms, made edits, hit permissions errors, etc. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132, T9908 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14702
2015-12-08 02:11:35 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationIsEditController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationIsEditController.php',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationListController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationListController.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationLockController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationLockController.php',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationPHIDType' => 'applications/transactions/phid/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationQuery' => 'applications/transactions/query/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationQuery.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationReorderController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationReorderController.php',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationSaveController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationSaveController.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationSearchEngine' => 'applications/transactions/query/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationSortController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationSortController.php',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationTransaction' => 'applications/transactions/storage/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationTransactionQuery' => 'applications/transactions/query/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationViewController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationViewController.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorEditEngineController.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineExtension' => 'applications/transactions/editengineextension/PhabricatorEditEngineExtension.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineExtensionModule' => 'applications/transactions/editengineextension/PhabricatorEditEngineExtensionModule.php',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditEngineListController' => 'applications/transactions/controller/PhabricatorEditEngineListController.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineQuery' => 'applications/transactions/query/PhabricatorEditEngineQuery.php',
'PhabricatorEditEngineSearchEngine' => 'applications/transactions/query/PhabricatorEditEngineSearchEngine.php',
Implement a basic version of ApplicationEditor in Paste Summary: Ref T9132. Ref T4768. This is a rough v0 of ApplicationEditor, which replaces the edit workflow in Paste. This mostly looks and works like ApplicationSearch, and is heavily modeled on it. Roughly, we define a set of editable fields and the ApplicationEditor stuff builds everything else. This has no functional changes, except: - I removed "Fork Paste" since I don't think it's particularly useful now that pastes are editable. We could restore it if users miss it. - Subscribers are now editable. - Form field order is a little goofy (this will be fixed in a future diff). - Subscribers and projects are now race-resistant. The race-resistance works like this: instead of submitting just the new value ("subscribers=apple, dog") and doing a set operation ("set subscribers = apple, dog"), we submit the old and new values ("original=apple" + "new=apple, dog") then apply the user's changes as an add + remove ("add=dog", "remove=<none>"). This means that two users who do "Edit Paste" at around the same time and each add or remove a couple of subscribers won't overwrite each other, unless they actually add or remove the exact same subscribers (in which case their edits legitimately conflict). Previously, the last user to save would win, and whatever was in their field would overwrite the prior state, potentially losing the first user's edits. Test Plan: - Created pastes. - Created pastes via API. - Edited pastes. - Edited every field. - Opened a paste in two windows and did project/subscriber edits in each, saved in arbitrary order, had edits respected. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14390
2015-11-03 03:58:32 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditField' => 'applications/transactions/editfield/PhabricatorEditField.php',
'PhabricatorEditType' => 'applications/transactions/edittype/PhabricatorEditType.php',
'PhabricatorEditor' => 'infrastructure/PhabricatorEditor.php',
'PhabricatorElasticSearchEngine' => 'applications/search/engine/PhabricatorElasticSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorElasticSearchSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorElasticSearchSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorEmailAddressesSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorEmailAddressesSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorEmailFormatSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorEmailFormatSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorEmailLoginController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorEmailLoginController.php',
'PhabricatorEmailPreferencesSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorEmailPreferencesSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorEmailVerificationController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorEmailVerificationController.php',
'PhabricatorEmbedFileRemarkupRule' => 'applications/files/markup/PhabricatorEmbedFileRemarkupRule.php',
'PhabricatorEmojiRemarkupRule' => 'applications/macro/markup/PhabricatorEmojiRemarkupRule.php',
'PhabricatorEmptyQueryException' => 'infrastructure/query/PhabricatorEmptyQueryException.php',
'PhabricatorEnv' => 'infrastructure/env/PhabricatorEnv.php',
'PhabricatorEnvTestCase' => 'infrastructure/env/__tests__/PhabricatorEnvTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorEvent' => 'infrastructure/events/PhabricatorEvent.php',
'PhabricatorEventEngine' => 'infrastructure/events/PhabricatorEventEngine.php',
'PhabricatorEventListener' => 'infrastructure/events/PhabricatorEventListener.php',
'PhabricatorEventType' => 'infrastructure/events/constant/PhabricatorEventType.php',
'PhabricatorExampleEventListener' => 'infrastructure/events/PhabricatorExampleEventListener.php',
'PhabricatorExtendedPolicyInterface' => 'applications/policy/interface/PhabricatorExtendedPolicyInterface.php',
'PhabricatorExtendingPhabricatorConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorExtendingPhabricatorConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorExtensionsSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorExtensionsSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorExternalAccount' => 'applications/people/storage/PhabricatorExternalAccount.php',
'PhabricatorExternalAccountQuery' => 'applications/auth/query/PhabricatorExternalAccountQuery.php',
'PhabricatorExternalAccountsSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorExternalAccountsSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorExtraConfigSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorExtraConfigSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorFacebookAuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorFacebookAuthProvider.php',
2012-07-27 22:46:01 +02:00
'PhabricatorFactAggregate' => 'applications/fact/storage/PhabricatorFactAggregate.php',
'PhabricatorFactApplication' => 'applications/fact/application/PhabricatorFactApplication.php',
'PhabricatorFactChartController' => 'applications/fact/controller/PhabricatorFactChartController.php',
2012-07-27 22:46:01 +02:00
'PhabricatorFactController' => 'applications/fact/controller/PhabricatorFactController.php',
Add a basic "fact" application Summary: Basic "Fact" application with some storage, part of a daemon, and a control binary. = Goals = The general idea is that we have various statistics we'd like to compute, like the frequency of image macros, reviewer responsiveness, task close rates, etc. Computing these on page load is expensive and messy. By building an ETL pipeline and running it in a daemon, we can precompute statistics and just pull them out of "stats" tables. One way to do this is just to completely hard-code everything, e.g. have a daemon that runs every hour which issues a big-ass query and dumps results into a table per-fact or per fact-group. But this has a bunch of drawbacks: adding new stuff to the pipeline is a pain, various fact aggregators can't share much code, updates are slow and expensive, we can never build generic graphs on top of it, etc. I'm hoping to build an ETL pipeline which is generic enough that we can use it for most things we're interested in without needing schema changes, and so that installs can use it also without needing schema changes, while still being specific enough that it's fast and we can build useful stuff on top of it. I'm not sure if this will actually work, but it would be cool if it does so I'm starting pretty generally and we'll see how far I get. I haven't built this exact sort of thing before so I might be way off. I'm basing the whole thing on analyzing entire objects, not analyzing changes to objects. So each part of the pipeline is handed an object and told "analyze this", not handed a change. It pretty much deletes all the old data about that thing and then writes new data. I think this is simpler to implement and understand, and it protects us from all sorts of weird issues where we end up with some kind of garbage in the DB and have to wipe the whole thing. = Facts = The general idea is that we extract "facts" out of objects, and then the various view interfaces just report those facts. This change has on type of fact, a "raw fact", which is directly derived from an object. These facts are concerete and relate specifically to the object they are derived from. Some examples of such facts might be: D123 has 9 comments. D123 uses macro "psyduck" 15 times. D123 adds 35 lines. D123 has 5 files. D123 has 1 object. D123 has 1 object of type "DREV". D123 was created at epoch timestamp 89812351235. D123 was accepted by @alincoln at epoch timestamp 8397981839. The fact storage looks like this: <factType, objectPHID, objectA, valueX, valueY, epoch> Currently, we supprot one optional secondary key (like a user PHID or macro PHID), two optional integer values, and an optional timestamp. We might add more later. Each fact type can use these fields if it wants. Some facts use them, others don't. For instance, this diff adds a "N:*" fact, which is just the count of total objects in the system. These facts just look like: <"N:*", "PHID-xxxx-yyyy", ...> ...where all other fields are ignored. But some of the more complex facts might look like: <"DREV:accept", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", ..., ..., nnnn> # User 'yyyy' accepted at epoch 'nnnn'. <"FILE:macro", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-MACR-yyyy", 17, ..., ...> # Object 'xxxx' uses macro 'yyyy' 17 times. Facts have no uniqueness constraints. For @vrana's reviewer responsiveness stuff, we can insert multiple rows for each reviewer, e.g. <"DREV:reviewed", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", nnnn, ..., mmmm> # User 'yyyy' reviewed revision 'xxxx' after 'nnnn' seconds at 'mmmm'. The second value (valueY) is mostly because we need it if we sample anything (valueX = observed value, valueY = sample rate) but there might be other uses. We might need to add "objectB" at some point too -- currently we can't represent a fact like "User X used macro Y on revision Z", so it would be impossible to compute macro use rates //for a specific user// based on this schema. I think we can start here though and see how far we get. = Aggregated Facts = These aren't implemented yet, but the idea is that we can then take the "raw facts" and compute derived/aggregated/rollup facts based on the raw fact table. For example, the "count" fact can be aggregated to arrive at a count of all objects in the system. This stuff will live in a separate table which does have uniqueness constraints, and come in the next diff. We might need some kind of time series facts too, not sure about that. I think most of our use cases today are covered by raw facts + aggregated facts. Test Plan: Ran `bin/fact` commands and verified they seemed to do reasonable things. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan Reviewed By: vrana CC: aran, majak Maniphest Tasks: T1562 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3078
2012-07-27 22:34:21 +02:00
'PhabricatorFactCountEngine' => 'applications/fact/engine/PhabricatorFactCountEngine.php',
'PhabricatorFactCursor' => 'applications/fact/storage/PhabricatorFactCursor.php',
Add a basic "fact" application Summary: Basic "Fact" application with some storage, part of a daemon, and a control binary. = Goals = The general idea is that we have various statistics we'd like to compute, like the frequency of image macros, reviewer responsiveness, task close rates, etc. Computing these on page load is expensive and messy. By building an ETL pipeline and running it in a daemon, we can precompute statistics and just pull them out of "stats" tables. One way to do this is just to completely hard-code everything, e.g. have a daemon that runs every hour which issues a big-ass query and dumps results into a table per-fact or per fact-group. But this has a bunch of drawbacks: adding new stuff to the pipeline is a pain, various fact aggregators can't share much code, updates are slow and expensive, we can never build generic graphs on top of it, etc. I'm hoping to build an ETL pipeline which is generic enough that we can use it for most things we're interested in without needing schema changes, and so that installs can use it also without needing schema changes, while still being specific enough that it's fast and we can build useful stuff on top of it. I'm not sure if this will actually work, but it would be cool if it does so I'm starting pretty generally and we'll see how far I get. I haven't built this exact sort of thing before so I might be way off. I'm basing the whole thing on analyzing entire objects, not analyzing changes to objects. So each part of the pipeline is handed an object and told "analyze this", not handed a change. It pretty much deletes all the old data about that thing and then writes new data. I think this is simpler to implement and understand, and it protects us from all sorts of weird issues where we end up with some kind of garbage in the DB and have to wipe the whole thing. = Facts = The general idea is that we extract "facts" out of objects, and then the various view interfaces just report those facts. This change has on type of fact, a "raw fact", which is directly derived from an object. These facts are concerete and relate specifically to the object they are derived from. Some examples of such facts might be: D123 has 9 comments. D123 uses macro "psyduck" 15 times. D123 adds 35 lines. D123 has 5 files. D123 has 1 object. D123 has 1 object of type "DREV". D123 was created at epoch timestamp 89812351235. D123 was accepted by @alincoln at epoch timestamp 8397981839. The fact storage looks like this: <factType, objectPHID, objectA, valueX, valueY, epoch> Currently, we supprot one optional secondary key (like a user PHID or macro PHID), two optional integer values, and an optional timestamp. We might add more later. Each fact type can use these fields if it wants. Some facts use them, others don't. For instance, this diff adds a "N:*" fact, which is just the count of total objects in the system. These facts just look like: <"N:*", "PHID-xxxx-yyyy", ...> ...where all other fields are ignored. But some of the more complex facts might look like: <"DREV:accept", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", ..., ..., nnnn> # User 'yyyy' accepted at epoch 'nnnn'. <"FILE:macro", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-MACR-yyyy", 17, ..., ...> # Object 'xxxx' uses macro 'yyyy' 17 times. Facts have no uniqueness constraints. For @vrana's reviewer responsiveness stuff, we can insert multiple rows for each reviewer, e.g. <"DREV:reviewed", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", nnnn, ..., mmmm> # User 'yyyy' reviewed revision 'xxxx' after 'nnnn' seconds at 'mmmm'. The second value (valueY) is mostly because we need it if we sample anything (valueX = observed value, valueY = sample rate) but there might be other uses. We might need to add "objectB" at some point too -- currently we can't represent a fact like "User X used macro Y on revision Z", so it would be impossible to compute macro use rates //for a specific user// based on this schema. I think we can start here though and see how far we get. = Aggregated Facts = These aren't implemented yet, but the idea is that we can then take the "raw facts" and compute derived/aggregated/rollup facts based on the raw fact table. For example, the "count" fact can be aggregated to arrive at a count of all objects in the system. This stuff will live in a separate table which does have uniqueness constraints, and come in the next diff. We might need some kind of time series facts too, not sure about that. I think most of our use cases today are covered by raw facts + aggregated facts. Test Plan: Ran `bin/fact` commands and verified they seemed to do reasonable things. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan Reviewed By: vrana CC: aran, majak Maniphest Tasks: T1562 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3078
2012-07-27 22:34:21 +02:00
'PhabricatorFactDAO' => 'applications/fact/storage/PhabricatorFactDAO.php',
'PhabricatorFactDaemon' => 'applications/fact/daemon/PhabricatorFactDaemon.php',
'PhabricatorFactEngine' => 'applications/fact/engine/PhabricatorFactEngine.php',
'PhabricatorFactEngineTestCase' => 'applications/fact/engine/__tests__/PhabricatorFactEngineTestCase.php',
2012-07-27 22:46:01 +02:00
'PhabricatorFactHomeController' => 'applications/fact/controller/PhabricatorFactHomeController.php',
'PhabricatorFactLastUpdatedEngine' => 'applications/fact/engine/PhabricatorFactLastUpdatedEngine.php',
Add a basic "fact" application Summary: Basic "Fact" application with some storage, part of a daemon, and a control binary. = Goals = The general idea is that we have various statistics we'd like to compute, like the frequency of image macros, reviewer responsiveness, task close rates, etc. Computing these on page load is expensive and messy. By building an ETL pipeline and running it in a daemon, we can precompute statistics and just pull them out of "stats" tables. One way to do this is just to completely hard-code everything, e.g. have a daemon that runs every hour which issues a big-ass query and dumps results into a table per-fact or per fact-group. But this has a bunch of drawbacks: adding new stuff to the pipeline is a pain, various fact aggregators can't share much code, updates are slow and expensive, we can never build generic graphs on top of it, etc. I'm hoping to build an ETL pipeline which is generic enough that we can use it for most things we're interested in without needing schema changes, and so that installs can use it also without needing schema changes, while still being specific enough that it's fast and we can build useful stuff on top of it. I'm not sure if this will actually work, but it would be cool if it does so I'm starting pretty generally and we'll see how far I get. I haven't built this exact sort of thing before so I might be way off. I'm basing the whole thing on analyzing entire objects, not analyzing changes to objects. So each part of the pipeline is handed an object and told "analyze this", not handed a change. It pretty much deletes all the old data about that thing and then writes new data. I think this is simpler to implement and understand, and it protects us from all sorts of weird issues where we end up with some kind of garbage in the DB and have to wipe the whole thing. = Facts = The general idea is that we extract "facts" out of objects, and then the various view interfaces just report those facts. This change has on type of fact, a "raw fact", which is directly derived from an object. These facts are concerete and relate specifically to the object they are derived from. Some examples of such facts might be: D123 has 9 comments. D123 uses macro "psyduck" 15 times. D123 adds 35 lines. D123 has 5 files. D123 has 1 object. D123 has 1 object of type "DREV". D123 was created at epoch timestamp 89812351235. D123 was accepted by @alincoln at epoch timestamp 8397981839. The fact storage looks like this: <factType, objectPHID, objectA, valueX, valueY, epoch> Currently, we supprot one optional secondary key (like a user PHID or macro PHID), two optional integer values, and an optional timestamp. We might add more later. Each fact type can use these fields if it wants. Some facts use them, others don't. For instance, this diff adds a "N:*" fact, which is just the count of total objects in the system. These facts just look like: <"N:*", "PHID-xxxx-yyyy", ...> ...where all other fields are ignored. But some of the more complex facts might look like: <"DREV:accept", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", ..., ..., nnnn> # User 'yyyy' accepted at epoch 'nnnn'. <"FILE:macro", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-MACR-yyyy", 17, ..., ...> # Object 'xxxx' uses macro 'yyyy' 17 times. Facts have no uniqueness constraints. For @vrana's reviewer responsiveness stuff, we can insert multiple rows for each reviewer, e.g. <"DREV:reviewed", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", nnnn, ..., mmmm> # User 'yyyy' reviewed revision 'xxxx' after 'nnnn' seconds at 'mmmm'. The second value (valueY) is mostly because we need it if we sample anything (valueX = observed value, valueY = sample rate) but there might be other uses. We might need to add "objectB" at some point too -- currently we can't represent a fact like "User X used macro Y on revision Z", so it would be impossible to compute macro use rates //for a specific user// based on this schema. I think we can start here though and see how far we get. = Aggregated Facts = These aren't implemented yet, but the idea is that we can then take the "raw facts" and compute derived/aggregated/rollup facts based on the raw fact table. For example, the "count" fact can be aggregated to arrive at a count of all objects in the system. This stuff will live in a separate table which does have uniqueness constraints, and come in the next diff. We might need some kind of time series facts too, not sure about that. I think most of our use cases today are covered by raw facts + aggregated facts. Test Plan: Ran `bin/fact` commands and verified they seemed to do reasonable things. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan Reviewed By: vrana CC: aran, majak Maniphest Tasks: T1562 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3078
2012-07-27 22:34:21 +02:00
'PhabricatorFactManagementAnalyzeWorkflow' => 'applications/fact/management/PhabricatorFactManagementAnalyzeWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorFactManagementCursorsWorkflow' => 'applications/fact/management/PhabricatorFactManagementCursorsWorkflow.php',
Add a basic "fact" application Summary: Basic "Fact" application with some storage, part of a daemon, and a control binary. = Goals = The general idea is that we have various statistics we'd like to compute, like the frequency of image macros, reviewer responsiveness, task close rates, etc. Computing these on page load is expensive and messy. By building an ETL pipeline and running it in a daemon, we can precompute statistics and just pull them out of "stats" tables. One way to do this is just to completely hard-code everything, e.g. have a daemon that runs every hour which issues a big-ass query and dumps results into a table per-fact or per fact-group. But this has a bunch of drawbacks: adding new stuff to the pipeline is a pain, various fact aggregators can't share much code, updates are slow and expensive, we can never build generic graphs on top of it, etc. I'm hoping to build an ETL pipeline which is generic enough that we can use it for most things we're interested in without needing schema changes, and so that installs can use it also without needing schema changes, while still being specific enough that it's fast and we can build useful stuff on top of it. I'm not sure if this will actually work, but it would be cool if it does so I'm starting pretty generally and we'll see how far I get. I haven't built this exact sort of thing before so I might be way off. I'm basing the whole thing on analyzing entire objects, not analyzing changes to objects. So each part of the pipeline is handed an object and told "analyze this", not handed a change. It pretty much deletes all the old data about that thing and then writes new data. I think this is simpler to implement and understand, and it protects us from all sorts of weird issues where we end up with some kind of garbage in the DB and have to wipe the whole thing. = Facts = The general idea is that we extract "facts" out of objects, and then the various view interfaces just report those facts. This change has on type of fact, a "raw fact", which is directly derived from an object. These facts are concerete and relate specifically to the object they are derived from. Some examples of such facts might be: D123 has 9 comments. D123 uses macro "psyduck" 15 times. D123 adds 35 lines. D123 has 5 files. D123 has 1 object. D123 has 1 object of type "DREV". D123 was created at epoch timestamp 89812351235. D123 was accepted by @alincoln at epoch timestamp 8397981839. The fact storage looks like this: <factType, objectPHID, objectA, valueX, valueY, epoch> Currently, we supprot one optional secondary key (like a user PHID or macro PHID), two optional integer values, and an optional timestamp. We might add more later. Each fact type can use these fields if it wants. Some facts use them, others don't. For instance, this diff adds a "N:*" fact, which is just the count of total objects in the system. These facts just look like: <"N:*", "PHID-xxxx-yyyy", ...> ...where all other fields are ignored. But some of the more complex facts might look like: <"DREV:accept", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", ..., ..., nnnn> # User 'yyyy' accepted at epoch 'nnnn'. <"FILE:macro", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-MACR-yyyy", 17, ..., ...> # Object 'xxxx' uses macro 'yyyy' 17 times. Facts have no uniqueness constraints. For @vrana's reviewer responsiveness stuff, we can insert multiple rows for each reviewer, e.g. <"DREV:reviewed", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", nnnn, ..., mmmm> # User 'yyyy' reviewed revision 'xxxx' after 'nnnn' seconds at 'mmmm'. The second value (valueY) is mostly because we need it if we sample anything (valueX = observed value, valueY = sample rate) but there might be other uses. We might need to add "objectB" at some point too -- currently we can't represent a fact like "User X used macro Y on revision Z", so it would be impossible to compute macro use rates //for a specific user// based on this schema. I think we can start here though and see how far we get. = Aggregated Facts = These aren't implemented yet, but the idea is that we can then take the "raw facts" and compute derived/aggregated/rollup facts based on the raw fact table. For example, the "count" fact can be aggregated to arrive at a count of all objects in the system. This stuff will live in a separate table which does have uniqueness constraints, and come in the next diff. We might need some kind of time series facts too, not sure about that. I think most of our use cases today are covered by raw facts + aggregated facts. Test Plan: Ran `bin/fact` commands and verified they seemed to do reasonable things. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan Reviewed By: vrana CC: aran, majak Maniphest Tasks: T1562 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3078
2012-07-27 22:34:21 +02:00
'PhabricatorFactManagementDestroyWorkflow' => 'applications/fact/management/PhabricatorFactManagementDestroyWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorFactManagementListWorkflow' => 'applications/fact/management/PhabricatorFactManagementListWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorFactManagementStatusWorkflow' => 'applications/fact/management/PhabricatorFactManagementStatusWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorFactManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/fact/management/PhabricatorFactManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorFactRaw' => 'applications/fact/storage/PhabricatorFactRaw.php',
'PhabricatorFactSimpleSpec' => 'applications/fact/spec/PhabricatorFactSimpleSpec.php',
'PhabricatorFactSpec' => 'applications/fact/spec/PhabricatorFactSpec.php',
Add a basic "fact" application Summary: Basic "Fact" application with some storage, part of a daemon, and a control binary. = Goals = The general idea is that we have various statistics we'd like to compute, like the frequency of image macros, reviewer responsiveness, task close rates, etc. Computing these on page load is expensive and messy. By building an ETL pipeline and running it in a daemon, we can precompute statistics and just pull them out of "stats" tables. One way to do this is just to completely hard-code everything, e.g. have a daemon that runs every hour which issues a big-ass query and dumps results into a table per-fact or per fact-group. But this has a bunch of drawbacks: adding new stuff to the pipeline is a pain, various fact aggregators can't share much code, updates are slow and expensive, we can never build generic graphs on top of it, etc. I'm hoping to build an ETL pipeline which is generic enough that we can use it for most things we're interested in without needing schema changes, and so that installs can use it also without needing schema changes, while still being specific enough that it's fast and we can build useful stuff on top of it. I'm not sure if this will actually work, but it would be cool if it does so I'm starting pretty generally and we'll see how far I get. I haven't built this exact sort of thing before so I might be way off. I'm basing the whole thing on analyzing entire objects, not analyzing changes to objects. So each part of the pipeline is handed an object and told "analyze this", not handed a change. It pretty much deletes all the old data about that thing and then writes new data. I think this is simpler to implement and understand, and it protects us from all sorts of weird issues where we end up with some kind of garbage in the DB and have to wipe the whole thing. = Facts = The general idea is that we extract "facts" out of objects, and then the various view interfaces just report those facts. This change has on type of fact, a "raw fact", which is directly derived from an object. These facts are concerete and relate specifically to the object they are derived from. Some examples of such facts might be: D123 has 9 comments. D123 uses macro "psyduck" 15 times. D123 adds 35 lines. D123 has 5 files. D123 has 1 object. D123 has 1 object of type "DREV". D123 was created at epoch timestamp 89812351235. D123 was accepted by @alincoln at epoch timestamp 8397981839. The fact storage looks like this: <factType, objectPHID, objectA, valueX, valueY, epoch> Currently, we supprot one optional secondary key (like a user PHID or macro PHID), two optional integer values, and an optional timestamp. We might add more later. Each fact type can use these fields if it wants. Some facts use them, others don't. For instance, this diff adds a "N:*" fact, which is just the count of total objects in the system. These facts just look like: <"N:*", "PHID-xxxx-yyyy", ...> ...where all other fields are ignored. But some of the more complex facts might look like: <"DREV:accept", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", ..., ..., nnnn> # User 'yyyy' accepted at epoch 'nnnn'. <"FILE:macro", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-MACR-yyyy", 17, ..., ...> # Object 'xxxx' uses macro 'yyyy' 17 times. Facts have no uniqueness constraints. For @vrana's reviewer responsiveness stuff, we can insert multiple rows for each reviewer, e.g. <"DREV:reviewed", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", nnnn, ..., mmmm> # User 'yyyy' reviewed revision 'xxxx' after 'nnnn' seconds at 'mmmm'. The second value (valueY) is mostly because we need it if we sample anything (valueX = observed value, valueY = sample rate) but there might be other uses. We might need to add "objectB" at some point too -- currently we can't represent a fact like "User X used macro Y on revision Z", so it would be impossible to compute macro use rates //for a specific user// based on this schema. I think we can start here though and see how far we get. = Aggregated Facts = These aren't implemented yet, but the idea is that we can then take the "raw facts" and compute derived/aggregated/rollup facts based on the raw fact table. For example, the "count" fact can be aggregated to arrive at a count of all objects in the system. This stuff will live in a separate table which does have uniqueness constraints, and come in the next diff. We might need some kind of time series facts too, not sure about that. I think most of our use cases today are covered by raw facts + aggregated facts. Test Plan: Ran `bin/fact` commands and verified they seemed to do reasonable things. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan Reviewed By: vrana CC: aran, majak Maniphest Tasks: T1562 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3078
2012-07-27 22:34:21 +02:00
'PhabricatorFactUpdateIterator' => 'applications/fact/extract/PhabricatorFactUpdateIterator.php',
'PhabricatorFeedApplication' => 'applications/feed/application/PhabricatorFeedApplication.php',
'PhabricatorFeedBuilder' => 'applications/feed/builder/PhabricatorFeedBuilder.php',
'PhabricatorFeedConfigOptions' => 'applications/feed/config/PhabricatorFeedConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorFeedController' => 'applications/feed/controller/PhabricatorFeedController.php',
'PhabricatorFeedDAO' => 'applications/feed/storage/PhabricatorFeedDAO.php',
'PhabricatorFeedDetailController' => 'applications/feed/controller/PhabricatorFeedDetailController.php',
'PhabricatorFeedListController' => 'applications/feed/controller/PhabricatorFeedListController.php',
Push feed publishing deeper into the task queue Summary: Ref T2852. I want to model Asana integration as a response to feed events. Currently, we queue one feed event for each HTTP hook. Instead, always queue one feed event and then have it queue any necessary followup events (now, http hooks; soon, asana). Add a script to make it easy to reproducibly fire feed event publishing. Test Plan: Republished a feed event and verified it hit configured HTTP hooks correctly. $ ./bin/feed republish 5765774156541908292 --trace >>> [2] <connect> phabricator2_feed <<< [2] <connect> 1,660 us >>> [3] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC <<< [3] <query> 595 us >>> [4] <connect> phabricator2_differential <<< [4] <connect> 760 us >>> [5] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [5] <query> 478 us >>> [6] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [6] <query> 449 us >>> [7] <connect> phabricator2_user <<< [7] <connect> 1,062 us >>> [8] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') <<< [8] <query> 540 us >>> [9] <connect> phabricator2_file <<< [9] <connect> 951 us >>> [10] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7') <<< [10] <query> 498 us >>> [11] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo <<< [11] <query> 507 us Republishing story... >>> [12] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC <<< [12] <query> 685 us >>> [13] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [13] <query> 489 us >>> [14] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [14] <query> 512 us >>> [15] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') <<< [15] <query> 601 us >>> [16] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7') <<< [16] <query> 405 us >>> [17] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo <<< [17] <query> 551 us >>> [18] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC <<< [18] <query> 507 us >>> [19] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [19] <query> 428 us >>> [20] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [20] <query> 419 us >>> [21] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') <<< [21] <query> 591 us >>> [22] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7') <<< [22] <query> 406 us >>> [23] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo <<< [23] <query> 593 us >>> [24] <http> http://127.0.0.1/derp/ <<< [24] <http> 746,157 us [2013-06-24 20:23:26] EXCEPTION: (HTTPFutureResponseStatusHTTP) [HTTP/500] Internal Server Error Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2852 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6291
2013-06-26 01:29:47 +02:00
'PhabricatorFeedManagementRepublishWorkflow' => 'applications/feed/management/PhabricatorFeedManagementRepublishWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorFeedManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/feed/management/PhabricatorFeedManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorFeedQuery' => 'applications/feed/query/PhabricatorFeedQuery.php',
'PhabricatorFeedSearchEngine' => 'applications/feed/query/PhabricatorFeedSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorFeedStory' => 'applications/feed/story/PhabricatorFeedStory.php',
'PhabricatorFeedStoryData' => 'applications/feed/storage/PhabricatorFeedStoryData.php',
'PhabricatorFeedStoryNotification' => 'applications/notification/storage/PhabricatorFeedStoryNotification.php',
'PhabricatorFeedStoryPublisher' => 'applications/feed/PhabricatorFeedStoryPublisher.php',
'PhabricatorFeedStoryReference' => 'applications/feed/storage/PhabricatorFeedStoryReference.php',
'PhabricatorFile' => 'applications/files/storage/PhabricatorFile.php',
'PhabricatorFileBundleLoader' => 'applications/files/query/PhabricatorFileBundleLoader.php',
Add a chunking storage engine for files Summary: Ref T7149. This isn't complete and isn't active yet, but does basically work. I'll shore it up in the next few diffs. The new workflow goes like this: > Client, file.allocate(): I'd like to upload a file with length L, metadata M, and hash H. Then the server returns `upload` (a boolean) and `filePHID` (a PHID). These mean: | upload | filePHID | means | |---|---|---| | false | false | Server can't accept file. | false | true | File data already known, file created from hash. | true | false | Just upload normally. | true | true | Query chunks to start or resume a chunked upload. All but the last case are uninteresting and work like exising uploads with `file.uploadhash` (which we can eventually deprecate). In the last case: > Client, file.querychunks(): Give me a list of chunks that I should upload. This returns all the chunks for the file. Chunks have a start byte, an end byte, and a "complete" flag to indicate that the server already has the data. Then, the client fills in chunks by sending them: > Client, file.uploadchunk(): Here is the data for one chunk. This stuff doesn't work yet or has some caveats: - I haven't tested resume much. - Files need an "isPartial()" flag for partial uploads, and the UI needs to respect it. - The JS client needs to become chunk-aware. - Chunk size is set crazy low to make testing easier. - Some debugging flags that I'll remove soon-ish. - Downloading works, but still streams the whole file into memory. - This storage engine is disabled by default (hardcoded as a unit test engine) because it's still sketchy. - Need some code to remove the "isParital" flag when the last chunk is uploaded. - Maybe do checksumming on chunks. Test Plan: - Hacked up `arc upload` (see next diff) to be chunk-aware and uploaded a readme in 18 32-byte chunks. Then downloaded it. Got the same file back that I uploaded. - File UI now shows some basic chunk info for chunked files: {F336434} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7149 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12060
2015-03-13 19:30:02 +01:00
'PhabricatorFileChunk' => 'applications/files/storage/PhabricatorFileChunk.php',
'PhabricatorFileChunkIterator' => 'applications/files/engine/PhabricatorFileChunkIterator.php',
Add a chunking storage engine for files Summary: Ref T7149. This isn't complete and isn't active yet, but does basically work. I'll shore it up in the next few diffs. The new workflow goes like this: > Client, file.allocate(): I'd like to upload a file with length L, metadata M, and hash H. Then the server returns `upload` (a boolean) and `filePHID` (a PHID). These mean: | upload | filePHID | means | |---|---|---| | false | false | Server can't accept file. | false | true | File data already known, file created from hash. | true | false | Just upload normally. | true | true | Query chunks to start or resume a chunked upload. All but the last case are uninteresting and work like exising uploads with `file.uploadhash` (which we can eventually deprecate). In the last case: > Client, file.querychunks(): Give me a list of chunks that I should upload. This returns all the chunks for the file. Chunks have a start byte, an end byte, and a "complete" flag to indicate that the server already has the data. Then, the client fills in chunks by sending them: > Client, file.uploadchunk(): Here is the data for one chunk. This stuff doesn't work yet or has some caveats: - I haven't tested resume much. - Files need an "isPartial()" flag for partial uploads, and the UI needs to respect it. - The JS client needs to become chunk-aware. - Chunk size is set crazy low to make testing easier. - Some debugging flags that I'll remove soon-ish. - Downloading works, but still streams the whole file into memory. - This storage engine is disabled by default (hardcoded as a unit test engine) because it's still sketchy. - Need some code to remove the "isParital" flag when the last chunk is uploaded. - Maybe do checksumming on chunks. Test Plan: - Hacked up `arc upload` (see next diff) to be chunk-aware and uploaded a readme in 18 32-byte chunks. Then downloaded it. Got the same file back that I uploaded. - File UI now shows some basic chunk info for chunked files: {F336434} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7149 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12060
2015-03-13 19:30:02 +01:00
'PhabricatorFileChunkQuery' => 'applications/files/query/PhabricatorFileChunkQuery.php',
'PhabricatorFileCommentController' => 'applications/files/controller/PhabricatorFileCommentController.php',
'PhabricatorFileComposeController' => 'applications/files/controller/PhabricatorFileComposeController.php',
'PhabricatorFileController' => 'applications/files/controller/PhabricatorFileController.php',
'PhabricatorFileDAO' => 'applications/files/storage/PhabricatorFileDAO.php',
'PhabricatorFileDataController' => 'applications/files/controller/PhabricatorFileDataController.php',
'PhabricatorFileDeleteController' => 'applications/files/controller/PhabricatorFileDeleteController.php',
'PhabricatorFileDropUploadController' => 'applications/files/controller/PhabricatorFileDropUploadController.php',
'PhabricatorFileEditController' => 'applications/files/controller/PhabricatorFileEditController.php',
'PhabricatorFileEditor' => 'applications/files/editor/PhabricatorFileEditor.php',
'PhabricatorFileFilePHIDType' => 'applications/files/phid/PhabricatorFileFilePHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorFileHasObjectEdgeType' => 'applications/files/edge/PhabricatorFileHasObjectEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorFileImageMacro' => 'applications/macro/storage/PhabricatorFileImageMacro.php',
'PhabricatorFileImageTransform' => 'applications/files/transform/PhabricatorFileImageTransform.php',
'PhabricatorFileInfoController' => 'applications/files/controller/PhabricatorFileInfoController.php',
'PhabricatorFileLinkView' => 'view/layout/PhabricatorFileLinkView.php',
'PhabricatorFileListController' => 'applications/files/controller/PhabricatorFileListController.php',
'PhabricatorFileQuery' => 'applications/files/query/PhabricatorFileQuery.php',
'PhabricatorFileSchemaSpec' => 'applications/files/storage/PhabricatorFileSchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorFileSearchEngine' => 'applications/files/query/PhabricatorFileSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorFileStorageBlob' => 'applications/files/storage/PhabricatorFileStorageBlob.php',
'PhabricatorFileStorageConfigurationException' => 'applications/files/exception/PhabricatorFileStorageConfigurationException.php',
'PhabricatorFileStorageEngine' => 'applications/files/engine/PhabricatorFileStorageEngine.php',
'PhabricatorFileStorageEngineTestCase' => 'applications/files/engine/__tests__/PhabricatorFileStorageEngineTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorFileTemporaryGarbageCollector' => 'applications/files/garbagecollector/PhabricatorFileTemporaryGarbageCollector.php',
'PhabricatorFileTestCase' => 'applications/files/storage/__tests__/PhabricatorFileTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorFileTestDataGenerator' => 'applications/files/lipsum/PhabricatorFileTestDataGenerator.php',
'PhabricatorFileThumbnailTransform' => 'applications/files/transform/PhabricatorFileThumbnailTransform.php',
'PhabricatorFileTransaction' => 'applications/files/storage/PhabricatorFileTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorFileTransactionComment' => 'applications/files/storage/PhabricatorFileTransactionComment.php',
'PhabricatorFileTransactionQuery' => 'applications/files/query/PhabricatorFileTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorFileTransform' => 'applications/files/transform/PhabricatorFileTransform.php',
'PhabricatorFileTransformController' => 'applications/files/controller/PhabricatorFileTransformController.php',
'PhabricatorFileTransformListController' => 'applications/files/controller/PhabricatorFileTransformListController.php',
'PhabricatorFileTransformTestCase' => 'applications/files/transform/__tests__/PhabricatorFileTransformTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorFileUploadController' => 'applications/files/controller/PhabricatorFileUploadController.php',
'PhabricatorFileUploadDialogController' => 'applications/files/controller/PhabricatorFileUploadDialogController.php',
'PhabricatorFileUploadException' => 'applications/files/exception/PhabricatorFileUploadException.php',
'PhabricatorFileinfoSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorFileinfoSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorFilesApplication' => 'applications/files/application/PhabricatorFilesApplication.php',
'PhabricatorFilesApplicationStorageEnginePanel' => 'applications/files/applicationpanel/PhabricatorFilesApplicationStorageEnginePanel.php',
'PhabricatorFilesConfigOptions' => 'applications/files/config/PhabricatorFilesConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorFilesManagementCatWorkflow' => 'applications/files/management/PhabricatorFilesManagementCatWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorFilesManagementCompactWorkflow' => 'applications/files/management/PhabricatorFilesManagementCompactWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorFilesManagementEnginesWorkflow' => 'applications/files/management/PhabricatorFilesManagementEnginesWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorFilesManagementMigrateWorkflow' => 'applications/files/management/PhabricatorFilesManagementMigrateWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorFilesManagementPurgeWorkflow' => 'applications/files/management/PhabricatorFilesManagementPurgeWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorFilesManagementRebuildWorkflow' => 'applications/files/management/PhabricatorFilesManagementRebuildWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorFilesManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/files/management/PhabricatorFilesManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorFilesOutboundRequestAction' => 'applications/files/action/PhabricatorFilesOutboundRequestAction.php',
'PhabricatorFlag' => 'applications/flag/storage/PhabricatorFlag.php',
'PhabricatorFlagAddFlagHeraldAction' => 'applications/flag/herald/PhabricatorFlagAddFlagHeraldAction.php',
'PhabricatorFlagColor' => 'applications/flag/constants/PhabricatorFlagColor.php',
'PhabricatorFlagConstants' => 'applications/flag/constants/PhabricatorFlagConstants.php',
'PhabricatorFlagController' => 'applications/flag/controller/PhabricatorFlagController.php',
'PhabricatorFlagDAO' => 'applications/flag/storage/PhabricatorFlagDAO.php',
'PhabricatorFlagDeleteController' => 'applications/flag/controller/PhabricatorFlagDeleteController.php',
'PhabricatorFlagEditController' => 'applications/flag/controller/PhabricatorFlagEditController.php',
'PhabricatorFlagListController' => 'applications/flag/controller/PhabricatorFlagListController.php',
'PhabricatorFlagQuery' => 'applications/flag/query/PhabricatorFlagQuery.php',
'PhabricatorFlagSearchEngine' => 'applications/flag/query/PhabricatorFlagSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorFlagSelectControl' => 'applications/flag/view/PhabricatorFlagSelectControl.php',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface' => 'applications/flag/interface/PhabricatorFlaggableInterface.php',
'PhabricatorFlagsApplication' => 'applications/flag/application/PhabricatorFlagsApplication.php',
'PhabricatorFlagsUIEventListener' => 'applications/flag/events/PhabricatorFlagsUIEventListener.php',
'PhabricatorFundApplication' => 'applications/fund/application/PhabricatorFundApplication.php',
'PhabricatorGDSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorGDSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorGarbageCollector' => 'infrastructure/daemon/garbagecollector/PhabricatorGarbageCollector.php',
'PhabricatorGarbageCollectorManagementCollectWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/daemon/garbagecollector/management/PhabricatorGarbageCollectorManagementCollectWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorGarbageCollectorManagementSetPolicyWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/daemon/garbagecollector/management/PhabricatorGarbageCollectorManagementSetPolicyWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorGarbageCollectorManagementWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/daemon/garbagecollector/management/PhabricatorGarbageCollectorManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorGestureUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PhabricatorGestureUIExample.php',
'PhabricatorGitGraphStream' => 'applications/repository/daemon/PhabricatorGitGraphStream.php',
'PhabricatorGitHubAuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorGitHubAuthProvider.php',
'PhabricatorGlobalLock' => 'infrastructure/util/PhabricatorGlobalLock.php',
'PhabricatorGlobalUploadTargetView' => 'applications/files/view/PhabricatorGlobalUploadTargetView.php',
'PhabricatorGoogleAuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorGoogleAuthProvider.php',
'PhabricatorHTTPParameterTypeTableView' => 'applications/config/view/PhabricatorHTTPParameterTypeTableView.php',
'PhabricatorHandleList' => 'applications/phid/handle/pool/PhabricatorHandleList.php',
'PhabricatorHandleObjectSelectorDataView' => 'applications/phid/handle/view/PhabricatorHandleObjectSelectorDataView.php',
'PhabricatorHandlePool' => 'applications/phid/handle/pool/PhabricatorHandlePool.php',
'PhabricatorHandlePoolTestCase' => 'applications/phid/handle/pool/__tests__/PhabricatorHandlePoolTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorHandleQuery' => 'applications/phid/query/PhabricatorHandleQuery.php',
'PhabricatorHandlesEditField' => 'applications/transactions/editfield/PhabricatorHandlesEditField.php',
'PhabricatorHarbormasterApplication' => 'applications/harbormaster/application/PhabricatorHarbormasterApplication.php',
'PhabricatorHarbormasterConfigOptions' => 'applications/harbormaster/config/PhabricatorHarbormasterConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorHash' => 'infrastructure/util/PhabricatorHash.php',
'PhabricatorHashTestCase' => 'infrastructure/util/__tests__/PhabricatorHashTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorHelpApplication' => 'applications/help/application/PhabricatorHelpApplication.php',
'PhabricatorHelpController' => 'applications/help/controller/PhabricatorHelpController.php',
'PhabricatorHelpDocumentationController' => 'applications/help/controller/PhabricatorHelpDocumentationController.php',
'PhabricatorHelpEditorProtocolController' => 'applications/help/controller/PhabricatorHelpEditorProtocolController.php',
'PhabricatorHelpKeyboardShortcutController' => 'applications/help/controller/PhabricatorHelpKeyboardShortcutController.php',
'PhabricatorHeraldApplication' => 'applications/herald/application/PhabricatorHeraldApplication.php',
'PhabricatorHighSecurityRequestExceptionHandler' => 'aphront/handler/PhabricatorHighSecurityRequestExceptionHandler.php',
'PhabricatorHomeApplication' => 'applications/home/application/PhabricatorHomeApplication.php',
'PhabricatorHomeController' => 'applications/home/controller/PhabricatorHomeController.php',
'PhabricatorHomeMainController' => 'applications/home/controller/PhabricatorHomeMainController.php',
'PhabricatorHomePreferencesSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorHomePreferencesSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorHomeQuickCreateController' => 'applications/home/controller/PhabricatorHomeQuickCreateController.php',
'PhabricatorHovercardUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PhabricatorHovercardUIExample.php',
'PhabricatorHovercardView' => 'view/widget/hovercard/PhabricatorHovercardView.php',
'PhabricatorHunksManagementMigrateWorkflow' => 'applications/differential/management/PhabricatorHunksManagementMigrateWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorHunksManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/differential/management/PhabricatorHunksManagementWorkflow.php',
First pass at decoupling Phabricator bot behavior from the protocol it's running on, this pulls the connection, reading, and writing functionalities out of the bot itself and into the adapter. Summary: Ugh, just wrote out a huge message, only to lose it with a fat-fingered ctrl-c. Le sigh. First pass at decoupling the bot from the protocol. Noticeably absent is the command/message coupling. After this design pass I'll give that a go. Could use some advice, thinking that handlers should only create messages (which can be public or private) and not open ended, undefined 'commands'. The problem being that there needs to be some consistant api if we want handlers to be protocol agnostic. Perhaps that's a pipedream, what are your thoughts? Secondly, a few notes, design review requests on the changes i did make: # Config. For now i'm passing config through to the adapter. This was mainly to remain backwards compatible on the config. I was thinking it should probably be namespaced into it's own subobject though to distinguish the adapter config from the bot config. # Adapter selection. This flavor is the one-bot-daemon, config specified protocol version. The upside is that in the future they won't have to run different daemons for this stuff, just have different config, and the door is open for multiple protocol adapters down the road if need be. The downside is that I had to rename the daemon (non-backwards compatible change) and there will need to be some sort of runtime evaluation for instatiation of the adapter. For now I just have a crude switch, but I was thinking of just taking the string they supply as the class name (ala `try { new $clasName(); } catch...`) so as to allow for homegrown adapters, but I wasn't sure how such runtime magic would go over. Also, an alternative would be to make the PhabricatorBot class a non-abstract non-final base class and have the adapters be accompanied by a bot class that just defines their adapter as a property. The upside of which is backwards compatibility (welcome back PhabricatorIRCBot) and perhaps a little bit clearer plugin path for homegrowners. # Logging. You'll notice I commented out two very important logging lines in the irc adapter. This isn't intended to remain commented out, but I'm not sure what the best way is to get logging at this layer. I'm wary of just composing the daemon back down into the adapter (bi-directional object composition makes my skin crawl), but something needs to happen, obviously. Advice? That's it. After the feedback on the above, you can either merge down, or wait until i finish the command/message refactor if you don't think the diff will grow too large. Up to you, this all functions as is. Test Plan: Ran an irc bot, connected, read input, and wrote output including handler integration. Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley CC: aran, Korvin Maniphest Tasks: T2462 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4757
2013-02-06 03:45:20 +01:00
'PhabricatorIRCProtocolAdapter' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/adapter/PhabricatorIRCProtocolAdapter.php',
'PhabricatorIconRemarkupRule' => 'applications/macro/markup/PhabricatorIconRemarkupRule.php',
'PhabricatorImageMacroRemarkupRule' => 'applications/macro/markup/PhabricatorImageMacroRemarkupRule.php',
'PhabricatorImageTransformer' => 'applications/files/PhabricatorImageTransformer.php',
'PhabricatorImagemagickSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorImagemagickSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorInfrastructureTestCase' => '__tests__/PhabricatorInfrastructureTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorInlineCommentController' => 'infrastructure/diff/PhabricatorInlineCommentController.php',
'PhabricatorInlineCommentInterface' => 'infrastructure/diff/interface/PhabricatorInlineCommentInterface.php',
'PhabricatorInlineCommentPreviewController' => 'infrastructure/diff/PhabricatorInlineCommentPreviewController.php',
'PhabricatorInlineSummaryView' => 'infrastructure/diff/view/PhabricatorInlineSummaryView.php',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorInstructionsEditField' => 'applications/transactions/editfield/PhabricatorInstructionsEditField.php',
'PhabricatorInternationalizationManagementExtractWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/internationalization/management/PhabricatorInternationalizationManagementExtractWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorInternationalizationManagementWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/internationalization/management/PhabricatorInternationalizationManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorInvalidConfigSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorInvalidConfigSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorIteratedMD5PasswordHasher' => 'infrastructure/util/password/PhabricatorIteratedMD5PasswordHasher.php',
'PhabricatorIteratedMD5PasswordHasherTestCase' => 'infrastructure/util/password/__tests__/PhabricatorIteratedMD5PasswordHasherTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorJIRAAuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorJIRAAuthProvider.php',
'PhabricatorJavelinLinter' => 'infrastructure/lint/linter/PhabricatorJavelinLinter.php',
'PhabricatorJiraIssueHasObjectEdgeType' => 'applications/doorkeeper/edge/PhabricatorJiraIssueHasObjectEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorJumpNavHandler' => 'applications/search/engine/PhabricatorJumpNavHandler.php',
'PhabricatorKeyValueDatabaseCache' => 'applications/cache/PhabricatorKeyValueDatabaseCache.php',
'PhabricatorLDAPAuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorLDAPAuthProvider.php',
'PhabricatorLegalpadApplication' => 'applications/legalpad/application/PhabricatorLegalpadApplication.php',
'PhabricatorLegalpadConfigOptions' => 'applications/legalpad/config/PhabricatorLegalpadConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorLegalpadDocumentPHIDType' => 'applications/legalpad/phid/PhabricatorLegalpadDocumentPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorLegalpadSignaturePolicyRule' => 'applications/legalpad/policyrule/PhabricatorLegalpadSignaturePolicyRule.php',
'PhabricatorLibraryTestCase' => '__tests__/PhabricatorLibraryTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorLipsumArtist' => 'applications/lipsum/image/PhabricatorLipsumArtist.php',
'PhabricatorLipsumGenerateWorkflow' => 'applications/lipsum/management/PhabricatorLipsumGenerateWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorLipsumManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/lipsum/management/PhabricatorLipsumManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorLipsumMondrianArtist' => 'applications/lipsum/image/PhabricatorLipsumMondrianArtist.php',
'PhabricatorLiskDAO' => 'infrastructure/storage/lisk/PhabricatorLiskDAO.php',
'PhabricatorLiskSearchEngineExtension' => 'applications/search/engineextension/PhabricatorLiskSearchEngineExtension.php',
'PhabricatorLiskSerializer' => 'infrastructure/storage/lisk/PhabricatorLiskSerializer.php',
'PhabricatorListFilterUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PhabricatorListFilterUIExample.php',
'PhabricatorLocalDiskFileStorageEngine' => 'applications/files/engine/PhabricatorLocalDiskFileStorageEngine.php',
'PhabricatorLocalTimeTestCase' => 'view/__tests__/PhabricatorLocalTimeTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorLocaleScopeGuard' => 'infrastructure/internationalization/scope/PhabricatorLocaleScopeGuard.php',
'PhabricatorLocaleScopeGuardTestCase' => 'infrastructure/internationalization/scope/__tests__/PhabricatorLocaleScopeGuardTestCase.php',
Implement clock/trigger infrastructure for scheduling actions Summary: Ref T6881. Hopefully, this is the hard part. This adds a new daemon (the "trigger" daemon) which processes triggers, schedules them, and then executes them at the scheduled time. The design is a little complicated, but has these goals: - High resistance to race conditions: only the application writes to the trigger table; only the daemon writes to the event table. We won't lose events if someone saves a meeting at the same time as we're sending a reminder out for it. - Execution guarantees: scheduled events are guaranteed to execute exactly once. - Support for arbitrarily large queues: the daemon will make progress even if there are millions of triggers in queue. The cost to update the queue is proportional to the number of changes in it; the cost to process the queue is proportional to the number of events to execute. - Relatively good observability: you can monitor the state of the trigger queue reasonably well from the web UI. - Modular Infrastructure: this is a very low-level construct that Calendar, Phortune, etc., should be able to build on top of. It doesn't have this stuff yet: - Not very robust to bad actions: a misbehaving trigger can stop the queue fairly easily. This is OK for now since we aren't planning to make it part of any other applications for a while. We do still get execute-exaclty-once, but it might not happen for a long time (until someone goes and fixes the queue), when we could theoretically continue executing other events. - Doesn't start automatically: normal users don't need to run this thing yet so I'm not starting it by default. - Not super well tested: I've vetted the basics but haven't run real workloads through this yet. - No sophisticated tooling: I added some basic stuff but it's missing some pieces we'll have to build sooner or later, e.g. `bin/trigger cancel` or whatever. - Intentionally not realtime: This design puts execution guarantees far above realtime concerns, and will not give you precise event execution at 1-second resolution. I think this is the correct goal to pursue architecturally, and certainly correct for subscriptions and meeting reminders. Events which execute after they have become irrelevant can simply decline to do anything (like a meeting reminder which executes after the meeting is over). In general, the expectation for applications is: - When creating an object (like a calendar event) that needs to trigger a scheduled action, write a trigger (and save the PHID if you plan to update it later). - The daemon will process the event and schedule the action efficiently, in a race-free way. - If you want to move the action, update the trigger and the daemon will take care of it. - Your action will eventually dump a task into the task queue, and the task daemons will actually perform it. Test Plan: Using a test script like this: ``` <?php require_once 'scripts/__init_script__.php'; $trigger = id(new PhabricatorWorkerTrigger()) ->setAction( new PhabricatorLogTriggerAction( array( 'message' => 'test', ))) ->setClock( new PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock( array( 'period' => 33, ))) ->save(); var_dump($trigger); ``` ...I queued triggers and ran the daemon: - Verified triggers fire; - verified triggers reschedule; - verified trigger events show up in the web UI; - tried different periods; - added some triggers while the daemon was running; - examined `phd debug` output for anything suspicious. It seems to work in trivial use case, at least. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T6881 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11419
2015-01-16 21:13:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorLogTriggerAction' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/action/PhabricatorLogTriggerAction.php',
'PhabricatorLogoutController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorLogoutController.php',
'PhabricatorLunarPhasePolicyRule' => 'applications/policy/rule/PhabricatorLunarPhasePolicyRule.php',
'PhabricatorMacroApplication' => 'applications/macro/application/PhabricatorMacroApplication.php',
'PhabricatorMacroAudioController' => 'applications/macro/controller/PhabricatorMacroAudioController.php',
'PhabricatorMacroCommentController' => 'applications/macro/controller/PhabricatorMacroCommentController.php',
'PhabricatorMacroConfigOptions' => 'applications/macro/config/PhabricatorMacroConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorMacroController' => 'applications/macro/controller/PhabricatorMacroController.php',
'PhabricatorMacroDatasource' => 'applications/macro/typeahead/PhabricatorMacroDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorMacroDisableController' => 'applications/macro/controller/PhabricatorMacroDisableController.php',
'PhabricatorMacroEditController' => 'applications/macro/controller/PhabricatorMacroEditController.php',
'PhabricatorMacroEditor' => 'applications/macro/editor/PhabricatorMacroEditor.php',
'PhabricatorMacroListController' => 'applications/macro/controller/PhabricatorMacroListController.php',
'PhabricatorMacroMacroPHIDType' => 'applications/macro/phid/PhabricatorMacroMacroPHIDType.php',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'PhabricatorMacroMailReceiver' => 'applications/macro/mail/PhabricatorMacroMailReceiver.php',
'PhabricatorMacroManageCapability' => 'applications/macro/capability/PhabricatorMacroManageCapability.php',
'PhabricatorMacroMemeController' => 'applications/macro/controller/PhabricatorMacroMemeController.php',
'PhabricatorMacroMemeDialogController' => 'applications/macro/controller/PhabricatorMacroMemeDialogController.php',
'PhabricatorMacroQuery' => 'applications/macro/query/PhabricatorMacroQuery.php',
'PhabricatorMacroReplyHandler' => 'applications/macro/mail/PhabricatorMacroReplyHandler.php',
'PhabricatorMacroSearchEngine' => 'applications/macro/query/PhabricatorMacroSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorMacroTransaction' => 'applications/macro/storage/PhabricatorMacroTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorMacroTransactionComment' => 'applications/macro/storage/PhabricatorMacroTransactionComment.php',
'PhabricatorMacroTransactionQuery' => 'applications/macro/query/PhabricatorMacroTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorMacroViewController' => 'applications/macro/controller/PhabricatorMacroViewController.php',
'PhabricatorMailEmailHeraldField' => 'applications/metamta/herald/PhabricatorMailEmailHeraldField.php',
'PhabricatorMailEmailHeraldFieldGroup' => 'applications/metamta/herald/PhabricatorMailEmailHeraldFieldGroup.php',
'PhabricatorMailEmailSubjectHeraldField' => 'applications/metamta/herald/PhabricatorMailEmailSubjectHeraldField.php',
'PhabricatorMailImplementationAdapter' => 'applications/metamta/adapter/PhabricatorMailImplementationAdapter.php',
'PhabricatorMailImplementationAmazonSESAdapter' => 'applications/metamta/adapter/PhabricatorMailImplementationAmazonSESAdapter.php',
'PhabricatorMailImplementationMailgunAdapter' => 'applications/metamta/adapter/PhabricatorMailImplementationMailgunAdapter.php',
'PhabricatorMailImplementationPHPMailerAdapter' => 'applications/metamta/adapter/PhabricatorMailImplementationPHPMailerAdapter.php',
'PhabricatorMailImplementationPHPMailerLiteAdapter' => 'applications/metamta/adapter/PhabricatorMailImplementationPHPMailerLiteAdapter.php',
'PhabricatorMailImplementationSendGridAdapter' => 'applications/metamta/adapter/PhabricatorMailImplementationSendGridAdapter.php',
'PhabricatorMailImplementationTestAdapter' => 'applications/metamta/adapter/PhabricatorMailImplementationTestAdapter.php',
'PhabricatorMailManagementListInboundWorkflow' => 'applications/metamta/management/PhabricatorMailManagementListInboundWorkflow.php',
Move outbound mail lists to CLI and enhance details Summary: Finish off moving all this stuff to the CLI. Ref T3306. Test Plan: PROPERTIES ID: 6483 Status: void Retry Count: 0 Next Retry: 1373494457 Related PHID: PHID-DREV-5bnb33yeuhuaulyc3exg Message: Message has no valid recipients: all To/Cc are disabled, invalid, or configured not to receive this mail. PARAMETERS from: PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov is-html: parent-message-id: null thread-id: differential-rev-PHID-DREV-5bnb33yeuhuaulyc3exg-req is-first-message: null is-bulk: 1 mailtags: ["differential-comment"] cc: ["PHID-USER-cluwcdowc35gmperlkbi"] subject: D22: quack quack subject-prefix: [Differential] vary-subject-prefix: [Commented On] worker-task: 936546 HEADERS Thread-Topic: D22: quack quack X-Herald-Rules: none X-Differential-Author: <PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov> X-Differential-CC: <PHID-USER-ly3pvrtdkw7lbgs72jvr> X-Differential-CC: <PHID-USER-cluwcdowc35gmperlkbi> X-Differential-CC: <PHID-MLST-wkxaantg3q6pgdkty5pt> X-Differential-CC: <PHID-USER-aeabc4ipqbifny3rw4ok> X-Differential-CC: <PHID-USER-zqxtb3oi4pouwxnxlv3f> X-Differential-CC: <PHID-USER-cknqtm2dzw7twnwyiaye> X-Differential-CCs: <PHID-USER-ly3pvrtdkw7lbgs72jvr>, <PHID-USER-cluwcdowc35gmperlkbi>, <PHID-MLST-wkxaantg3q6pgdkty5pt>, <PHID-USER-aeabc4ipqbifny3rw4ok>, <PHID-USER-zqxtb3oi4pouwxnxlv3f>, <PHID-USER-cknqtm2dzw7twnwyiaye> X-Differential-Explicit-CC: <PHID-USER-ly3pvrtdkw7lbgs72jvr> X-Differential-Explicit-CC: <PHID-USER-cluwcdowc35gmperlkbi> X-Differential-Explicit-CC: <PHID-MLST-wkxaantg3q6pgdkty5pt> X-Differential-Explicit-CC: <PHID-USER-aeabc4ipqbifny3rw4ok> X-Differential-Explicit-CC: <PHID-USER-zqxtb3oi4pouwxnxlv3f> X-Differential-Explicit-CC: <PHID-USER-cknqtm2dzw7twnwyiaye> X-Differential-Explicit-CCs: <PHID-USER-ly3pvrtdkw7lbgs72jvr>, <PHID-USER-cluwcdowc35gmperlkbi>, <PHID-MLST-wkxaantg3q6pgdkty5pt>, <PHID-USER-aeabc4ipqbifny3rw4ok>, <PHID-USER-zqxtb3oi4pouwxnxlv3f>, <PHID-USER-cknqtm2dzw7twnwyiaye> X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov> X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-ly3pvrtdkw7lbgs72jvr> X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-cluwcdowc35gmperlkbi> X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-MLST-wkxaantg3q6pgdkty5pt> X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-aeabc4ipqbifny3rw4ok> X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-zqxtb3oi4pouwxnxlv3f> X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-cknqtm2dzw7twnwyiaye> RECIPIENTS ! dog (dog) - This user is disabled; disabled users do not receive mail. BODY epriestley has commented on the revision "quack quack". zxcbzxcb REVISION DETAIL http://local.aphront.com:8080/D22 To: epriestley Cc: Unknown User, dog, list, duck, epriestley992, asana Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T3306 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6423
2013-07-11 03:52:22 +02:00
'PhabricatorMailManagementListOutboundWorkflow' => 'applications/metamta/management/PhabricatorMailManagementListOutboundWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorMailManagementReceiveTestWorkflow' => 'applications/metamta/management/PhabricatorMailManagementReceiveTestWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorMailManagementResendWorkflow' => 'applications/metamta/management/PhabricatorMailManagementResendWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorMailManagementSendTestWorkflow' => 'applications/metamta/management/PhabricatorMailManagementSendTestWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorMailManagementShowInboundWorkflow' => 'applications/metamta/management/PhabricatorMailManagementShowInboundWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorMailManagementShowOutboundWorkflow' => 'applications/metamta/management/PhabricatorMailManagementShowOutboundWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorMailManagementVolumeWorkflow' => 'applications/metamta/management/PhabricatorMailManagementVolumeWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorMailManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/metamta/management/PhabricatorMailManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorMailOutboundMailHeraldAdapter' => 'applications/metamta/herald/PhabricatorMailOutboundMailHeraldAdapter.php',
'PhabricatorMailOutboundRoutingHeraldAction' => 'applications/metamta/herald/PhabricatorMailOutboundRoutingHeraldAction.php',
'PhabricatorMailOutboundRoutingSelfEmailHeraldAction' => 'applications/metamta/herald/PhabricatorMailOutboundRoutingSelfEmailHeraldAction.php',
'PhabricatorMailOutboundRoutingSelfNotificationHeraldAction' => 'applications/metamta/herald/PhabricatorMailOutboundRoutingSelfNotificationHeraldAction.php',
'PhabricatorMailOutboundStatus' => 'applications/metamta/constants/PhabricatorMailOutboundStatus.php',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'PhabricatorMailReceiver' => 'applications/metamta/receiver/PhabricatorMailReceiver.php',
'PhabricatorMailReceiverTestCase' => 'applications/metamta/receiver/__tests__/PhabricatorMailReceiverTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorMailReplyHandler' => 'applications/metamta/replyhandler/PhabricatorMailReplyHandler.php',
'PhabricatorMailRoutingRule' => 'applications/metamta/constants/PhabricatorMailRoutingRule.php',
'PhabricatorMailSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorMailSetupCheck.php',
Build separate mail for each recipient, honoring recipient access levels Summary: Ref T6367. Removes `multiplexMail()`! We can't pass a single body into a function which splits it anymore: we need to split recipients first, then build bodies for each recipient list. This lets us build separate bodies for each recipient's individual translation/access levels. The new logic does this: - First, split recipients into groups called "targets". - Each target corresponds to one actual mail we're going to build. - Each target has a viewer (whose translation / access levels will be used to generate the mail). - Each target has a to/cc list (the users who we'll ultimately send the mail to). - For each target, build a custom mail body based on the viewer's access levels and settings (language prefs not actually implemented). - Then, deliver the mail. Test Plan: - Read new config help. Then did a bunch of testing, primarily with `bin/mail list-outbound` and `bin/mail show-outbound` (to review generated mail), `bin/phd debug taskmaster` (to run daemons freely) and `bin/worker execute --id <id>` (to repeatedly test a specific piece of code after identifying an issue). With `one-mail-per-recipient` on (default): - Sent mail to multiple users. - Verified mail showed up in `mail list-outbound`. - Examined mail with `mail show-outbound`. - Added a project that a subscriber could not see. - Verified it was not present in `X-Phabricator-Projects`. - Verified it was rendered as "Restricted Project" for the non-permissioned viewer. - Added a subscriber, then changed the object policy so they could not see it and sent mail. - Verified I received mail but the other user did not. - Enabled public replies and verified mail generated with public addresses. - Disabld public replies and verified mail generated with private addresses. With `one-mail-per-recipient` off: - Verified that one mail is sent to all recipients. - Verified users who can not see the object are still filtered. - Verified that partially-visible projects are completely visible in the mail (this violates policies, as documented, as the best available compromise). - Enabled public replies and verified the mail generated with "Reply To". Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: carlsverre, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T6367 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13131
2015-06-02 23:29:30 +02:00
'PhabricatorMailTarget' => 'applications/metamta/replyhandler/PhabricatorMailTarget.php',
'PhabricatorMailgunConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorMailgunConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorMainMenuSearchView' => 'view/page/menu/PhabricatorMainMenuSearchView.php',
'PhabricatorMainMenuView' => 'view/page/menu/PhabricatorMainMenuView.php',
'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/management/PhabricatorManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorManiphestApplication' => 'applications/maniphest/application/PhabricatorManiphestApplication.php',
'PhabricatorManiphestConfigOptions' => 'applications/maniphest/config/PhabricatorManiphestConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorManiphestTaskTestDataGenerator' => 'applications/maniphest/lipsum/PhabricatorManiphestTaskTestDataGenerator.php',
Add a generic multistep Markup cache Summary: The immediate issue this addresses is T1366, adding a rendering cache to Phriction. For wiki pages with code blocks especially, rerendering them each time is expensive. The broader issue is that out markup caches aren't very good right now. They have three major problems: **Problem 1: the data is stored in the wrong place.** We currently store remarkup caches on objects. This means we're always loading it and passing it around even when we don't need it, can't genericize cache management code (e.g., have one simple script to drop/GC caches), need to update authoritative rows to clear caches, and can't genericize rendering code since each object is different. To solve this, I created a dedicated cache database that I plan to move all markup caches to use. **Problem 2: time-variant rules break when cached.** Some rules like `**bold**` are time-invariant and always produce the same output, but some rules like `{Tnnn}` and `@username` are variant and may render differently (because a task was closed or a user is on vacation). Currently, we cache the raw output, so these time-variant rules get locked at whatever values they had when they were first rendered. This is the main reason Phriction doesn't have a cache right now -- I wanted `{Tnnn}` rules to reflect open/closed tasks. To solve this, I split markup into a "preprocessing" phase (which does all the parsing and evaluates all time-invariant rules) and a "postprocessing" phase (which evaluates time-variant rules only). The preprocessing phase is most of the expense (and, notably, includes syntax highlighting) so this is nearly as good as caching the final output. I did most of the work here in D737 / D738, but we never moved to use it in Phabricator -- we currently just do the two operations serially in all cases. This diff splits them apart and caches the output of preprocessing only, so we benefit from caching but also get accurate time-variant rendering. **Problem 3: cache access isn't batched/pipelined optimally.** When we're rendering a list of markup blocks, we should be able to batch datafetching better than we do. D738 helped with this (fetching is batched within a single hunk of markup) and this improves batching on cache access. We could still do better here, but this is at least a step forward. Also fixes a bug with generating a link in the Phriction history interface ($uri gets clobbered). I'm using PHP serialization instead of JSON serialization because Remarkup does some stuff with non-ascii characters that might not survive JSON. Test Plan: - Created a Phriction document and verified that previews don't go to cache (no rows appear in the cache table). - Verified that published documents come out of cache. - Verified that caches generate/regenerate correctly, time-variant rules render properly and old documents hit the right caches. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1366 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2945
2012-07-10 00:20:56 +02:00
'PhabricatorMarkupCache' => 'applications/cache/storage/PhabricatorMarkupCache.php',
'PhabricatorMarkupEngine' => 'infrastructure/markup/PhabricatorMarkupEngine.php',
Add a generic multistep Markup cache Summary: The immediate issue this addresses is T1366, adding a rendering cache to Phriction. For wiki pages with code blocks especially, rerendering them each time is expensive. The broader issue is that out markup caches aren't very good right now. They have three major problems: **Problem 1: the data is stored in the wrong place.** We currently store remarkup caches on objects. This means we're always loading it and passing it around even when we don't need it, can't genericize cache management code (e.g., have one simple script to drop/GC caches), need to update authoritative rows to clear caches, and can't genericize rendering code since each object is different. To solve this, I created a dedicated cache database that I plan to move all markup caches to use. **Problem 2: time-variant rules break when cached.** Some rules like `**bold**` are time-invariant and always produce the same output, but some rules like `{Tnnn}` and `@username` are variant and may render differently (because a task was closed or a user is on vacation). Currently, we cache the raw output, so these time-variant rules get locked at whatever values they had when they were first rendered. This is the main reason Phriction doesn't have a cache right now -- I wanted `{Tnnn}` rules to reflect open/closed tasks. To solve this, I split markup into a "preprocessing" phase (which does all the parsing and evaluates all time-invariant rules) and a "postprocessing" phase (which evaluates time-variant rules only). The preprocessing phase is most of the expense (and, notably, includes syntax highlighting) so this is nearly as good as caching the final output. I did most of the work here in D737 / D738, but we never moved to use it in Phabricator -- we currently just do the two operations serially in all cases. This diff splits them apart and caches the output of preprocessing only, so we benefit from caching but also get accurate time-variant rendering. **Problem 3: cache access isn't batched/pipelined optimally.** When we're rendering a list of markup blocks, we should be able to batch datafetching better than we do. D738 helped with this (fetching is batched within a single hunk of markup) and this improves batching on cache access. We could still do better here, but this is at least a step forward. Also fixes a bug with generating a link in the Phriction history interface ($uri gets clobbered). I'm using PHP serialization instead of JSON serialization because Remarkup does some stuff with non-ascii characters that might not survive JSON. Test Plan: - Created a Phriction document and verified that previews don't go to cache (no rows appear in the cache table). - Verified that published documents come out of cache. - Verified that caches generate/regenerate correctly, time-variant rules render properly and old documents hit the right caches. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1366 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2945
2012-07-10 00:20:56 +02:00
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface' => 'infrastructure/markup/PhabricatorMarkupInterface.php',
'PhabricatorMarkupOneOff' => 'infrastructure/markup/PhabricatorMarkupOneOff.php',
'PhabricatorMarkupPreviewController' => 'infrastructure/markup/PhabricatorMarkupPreviewController.php',
'PhabricatorMemeRemarkupRule' => 'applications/macro/markup/PhabricatorMemeRemarkupRule.php',
'PhabricatorMentionRemarkupRule' => 'applications/people/markup/PhabricatorMentionRemarkupRule.php',
'PhabricatorMentionableInterface' => 'applications/transactions/interface/PhabricatorMentionableInterface.php',
'PhabricatorMercurialGraphStream' => 'applications/repository/daemon/PhabricatorMercurialGraphStream.php',
Show why recipients were excluded from mail Summary: Ref T3306. This interface has a hard time balancing security/policy issues and I'm not sure what the best way forward is. Some possibilities: # We just let you see everything from the web UI. - This makes debugging easier. - Anyone who can see this stuff can trivially take over any user's account with five seconds of work and no technical expertise (reset their password from the web UI, then go read the email and click the link). # We let you see everything, but only for messages you were a recipient of or author of. - This makes it much more difficult to debug issues with mailing lists. - But maybe we could just say mailing list recipients are "public", or define some other ruleset. - Generally this gets privacy and ease of use right. # We could move the whole thing to the CLI. - Makes the UI/UX way worse. # We could strike an awkward balance between concerns, as we do now. - We expose //who// sent and received messages, but not the content of the messages. This doesn't feel great. I'm inclined to probably go with (2) and figure something out for mailing lists? Anyway, irrespective of that this should generally make things more clear, and improves the code a lot if nothing else. Test Plan: {F49546} - Looked at a bunch of mail. - Sent mail from different apps. - Checked that recipients seem correct. Reviewers: btrahan, chad Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T3306 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6413
2013-07-11 00:17:38 +02:00
'PhabricatorMetaMTAActor' => 'applications/metamta/query/PhabricatorMetaMTAActor.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAActorQuery' => 'applications/metamta/query/PhabricatorMetaMTAActorQuery.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplication' => 'applications/metamta/application/PhabricatorMetaMTAApplication.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmail' => 'applications/metamta/storage/PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmail.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailDatasource' => 'applications/metamta/typeahead/PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailEditor' => 'applications/metamta/editor/PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailEditor.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailHeraldField' => 'applications/metamta/herald/PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailHeraldField.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailPHIDType' => 'applications/phid/PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailPanel' => 'applications/metamta/applicationpanel/PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailPanel.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailQuery' => 'applications/metamta/query/PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailQuery.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailTransaction' => 'applications/metamta/storage/PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailTransactionQuery' => 'applications/metamta/query/PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAAttachment' => 'applications/metamta/storage/PhabricatorMetaMTAAttachment.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAController' => 'applications/metamta/controller/PhabricatorMetaMTAController.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTADAO' => 'applications/metamta/storage/PhabricatorMetaMTADAO.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailBodyParser' => 'applications/metamta/parser/PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailBodyParser.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailBodyParserTestCase' => 'applications/metamta/parser/__tests__/PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailBodyParserTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailHeraldAction' => 'applications/metamta/herald/PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailHeraldAction.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailOthersHeraldAction' => 'applications/metamta/herald/PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailOthersHeraldAction.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailSelfHeraldAction' => 'applications/metamta/herald/PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailSelfHeraldAction.php',
2014-04-04 03:43:18 +02:00
'PhabricatorMetaMTAErrorMailAction' => 'applications/metamta/action/PhabricatorMetaMTAErrorMailAction.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMail' => 'applications/metamta/storage/PhabricatorMetaMTAMail.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailBody' => 'applications/metamta/view/PhabricatorMetaMTAMailBody.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailBodyTestCase' => 'applications/metamta/view/__tests__/PhabricatorMetaMTAMailBodyTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailHasRecipientEdgeType' => 'applications/metamta/edge/PhabricatorMetaMTAMailHasRecipientEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailListController' => 'applications/metamta/controller/PhabricatorMetaMTAMailListController.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailPHIDType' => 'applications/metamta/phid/PhabricatorMetaMTAMailPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailQuery' => 'applications/metamta/query/PhabricatorMetaMTAMailQuery.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailSearchEngine' => 'applications/metamta/query/PhabricatorMetaMTAMailSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailSection' => 'applications/metamta/view/PhabricatorMetaMTAMailSection.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailTestCase' => 'applications/metamta/storage/__tests__/PhabricatorMetaMTAMailTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailViewController' => 'applications/metamta/controller/PhabricatorMetaMTAMailViewController.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailableDatasource' => 'applications/metamta/typeahead/PhabricatorMetaMTAMailableDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailableFunctionDatasource' => 'applications/metamta/typeahead/PhabricatorMetaMTAMailableFunctionDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailgunReceiveController' => 'applications/metamta/controller/PhabricatorMetaMTAMailgunReceiveController.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMemberQuery' => 'applications/metamta/query/PhabricatorMetaMTAMemberQuery.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAPermanentFailureException' => 'applications/metamta/exception/PhabricatorMetaMTAPermanentFailureException.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMail' => 'applications/metamta/storage/PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMail.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMailProcessingException' => 'applications/metamta/exception/PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMailProcessingException.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMailTestCase' => 'applications/metamta/storage/__tests__/PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMailTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTASchemaSpec' => 'applications/metamta/storage/PhabricatorMetaMTASchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTASendGridReceiveController' => 'applications/metamta/controller/PhabricatorMetaMTASendGridReceiveController.php',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAWorker' => 'applications/metamta/PhabricatorMetaMTAWorker.php',
Implement clock/trigger infrastructure for scheduling actions Summary: Ref T6881. Hopefully, this is the hard part. This adds a new daemon (the "trigger" daemon) which processes triggers, schedules them, and then executes them at the scheduled time. The design is a little complicated, but has these goals: - High resistance to race conditions: only the application writes to the trigger table; only the daemon writes to the event table. We won't lose events if someone saves a meeting at the same time as we're sending a reminder out for it. - Execution guarantees: scheduled events are guaranteed to execute exactly once. - Support for arbitrarily large queues: the daemon will make progress even if there are millions of triggers in queue. The cost to update the queue is proportional to the number of changes in it; the cost to process the queue is proportional to the number of events to execute. - Relatively good observability: you can monitor the state of the trigger queue reasonably well from the web UI. - Modular Infrastructure: this is a very low-level construct that Calendar, Phortune, etc., should be able to build on top of. It doesn't have this stuff yet: - Not very robust to bad actions: a misbehaving trigger can stop the queue fairly easily. This is OK for now since we aren't planning to make it part of any other applications for a while. We do still get execute-exaclty-once, but it might not happen for a long time (until someone goes and fixes the queue), when we could theoretically continue executing other events. - Doesn't start automatically: normal users don't need to run this thing yet so I'm not starting it by default. - Not super well tested: I've vetted the basics but haven't run real workloads through this yet. - No sophisticated tooling: I added some basic stuff but it's missing some pieces we'll have to build sooner or later, e.g. `bin/trigger cancel` or whatever. - Intentionally not realtime: This design puts execution guarantees far above realtime concerns, and will not give you precise event execution at 1-second resolution. I think this is the correct goal to pursue architecturally, and certainly correct for subscriptions and meeting reminders. Events which execute after they have become irrelevant can simply decline to do anything (like a meeting reminder which executes after the meeting is over). In general, the expectation for applications is: - When creating an object (like a calendar event) that needs to trigger a scheduled action, write a trigger (and save the PHID if you plan to update it later). - The daemon will process the event and schedule the action efficiently, in a race-free way. - If you want to move the action, update the trigger and the daemon will take care of it. - Your action will eventually dump a task into the task queue, and the task daemons will actually perform it. Test Plan: Using a test script like this: ``` <?php require_once 'scripts/__init_script__.php'; $trigger = id(new PhabricatorWorkerTrigger()) ->setAction( new PhabricatorLogTriggerAction( array( 'message' => 'test', ))) ->setClock( new PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock( array( 'period' => 33, ))) ->save(); var_dump($trigger); ``` ...I queued triggers and ran the daemon: - Verified triggers fire; - verified triggers reschedule; - verified trigger events show up in the web UI; - tried different periods; - added some triggers while the daemon was running; - examined `phd debug` output for anything suspicious. It seems to work in trivial use case, at least. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T6881 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11419
2015-01-16 21:13:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/clock/PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock.php',
'PhabricatorMultiColumnUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PhabricatorMultiColumnUIExample.php',
'PhabricatorMultiFactorSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorMultiFactorSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorMultimeterApplication' => 'applications/multimeter/application/PhabricatorMultimeterApplication.php',
'PhabricatorMustVerifyEmailController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorMustVerifyEmailController.php',
'PhabricatorMySQLConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorMySQLConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorMySQLFileStorageEngine' => 'applications/files/engine/PhabricatorMySQLFileStorageEngine.php',
'PhabricatorMySQLSearchEngine' => 'applications/search/engine/PhabricatorMySQLSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorMySQLSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorMySQLSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorNamedQuery' => 'applications/search/storage/PhabricatorNamedQuery.php',
'PhabricatorNamedQueryQuery' => 'applications/search/query/PhabricatorNamedQueryQuery.php',
'PhabricatorNavigationRemarkupRule' => 'infrastructure/markup/rule/PhabricatorNavigationRemarkupRule.php',
Implement clock/trigger infrastructure for scheduling actions Summary: Ref T6881. Hopefully, this is the hard part. This adds a new daemon (the "trigger" daemon) which processes triggers, schedules them, and then executes them at the scheduled time. The design is a little complicated, but has these goals: - High resistance to race conditions: only the application writes to the trigger table; only the daemon writes to the event table. We won't lose events if someone saves a meeting at the same time as we're sending a reminder out for it. - Execution guarantees: scheduled events are guaranteed to execute exactly once. - Support for arbitrarily large queues: the daemon will make progress even if there are millions of triggers in queue. The cost to update the queue is proportional to the number of changes in it; the cost to process the queue is proportional to the number of events to execute. - Relatively good observability: you can monitor the state of the trigger queue reasonably well from the web UI. - Modular Infrastructure: this is a very low-level construct that Calendar, Phortune, etc., should be able to build on top of. It doesn't have this stuff yet: - Not very robust to bad actions: a misbehaving trigger can stop the queue fairly easily. This is OK for now since we aren't planning to make it part of any other applications for a while. We do still get execute-exaclty-once, but it might not happen for a long time (until someone goes and fixes the queue), when we could theoretically continue executing other events. - Doesn't start automatically: normal users don't need to run this thing yet so I'm not starting it by default. - Not super well tested: I've vetted the basics but haven't run real workloads through this yet. - No sophisticated tooling: I added some basic stuff but it's missing some pieces we'll have to build sooner or later, e.g. `bin/trigger cancel` or whatever. - Intentionally not realtime: This design puts execution guarantees far above realtime concerns, and will not give you precise event execution at 1-second resolution. I think this is the correct goal to pursue architecturally, and certainly correct for subscriptions and meeting reminders. Events which execute after they have become irrelevant can simply decline to do anything (like a meeting reminder which executes after the meeting is over). In general, the expectation for applications is: - When creating an object (like a calendar event) that needs to trigger a scheduled action, write a trigger (and save the PHID if you plan to update it later). - The daemon will process the event and schedule the action efficiently, in a race-free way. - If you want to move the action, update the trigger and the daemon will take care of it. - Your action will eventually dump a task into the task queue, and the task daemons will actually perform it. Test Plan: Using a test script like this: ``` <?php require_once 'scripts/__init_script__.php'; $trigger = id(new PhabricatorWorkerTrigger()) ->setAction( new PhabricatorLogTriggerAction( array( 'message' => 'test', ))) ->setClock( new PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock( array( 'period' => 33, ))) ->save(); var_dump($trigger); ``` ...I queued triggers and ran the daemon: - Verified triggers fire; - verified triggers reschedule; - verified trigger events show up in the web UI; - tried different periods; - added some triggers while the daemon was running; - examined `phd debug` output for anything suspicious. It seems to work in trivial use case, at least. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T6881 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11419
2015-01-16 21:13:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorNeverTriggerClock' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/clock/PhabricatorNeverTriggerClock.php',
'PhabricatorNotificationBuilder' => 'applications/notification/builder/PhabricatorNotificationBuilder.php',
'PhabricatorNotificationClearController' => 'applications/notification/controller/PhabricatorNotificationClearController.php',
'PhabricatorNotificationClient' => 'applications/notification/client/PhabricatorNotificationClient.php',
'PhabricatorNotificationConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorNotificationConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorNotificationController' => 'applications/notification/controller/PhabricatorNotificationController.php',
'PhabricatorNotificationIndividualController' => 'applications/notification/controller/PhabricatorNotificationIndividualController.php',
'PhabricatorNotificationListController' => 'applications/notification/controller/PhabricatorNotificationListController.php',
'PhabricatorNotificationPanelController' => 'applications/notification/controller/PhabricatorNotificationPanelController.php',
'PhabricatorNotificationQuery' => 'applications/notification/query/PhabricatorNotificationQuery.php',
'PhabricatorNotificationSearchEngine' => 'applications/notification/query/PhabricatorNotificationSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorNotificationStatusController' => 'applications/notification/controller/PhabricatorNotificationStatusController.php',
'PhabricatorNotificationStatusView' => 'applications/notification/view/PhabricatorNotificationStatusView.php',
'PhabricatorNotificationTestController' => 'applications/notification/controller/PhabricatorNotificationTestController.php',
'PhabricatorNotificationTestFeedStory' => 'applications/notification/feed/PhabricatorNotificationTestFeedStory.php',
'PhabricatorNotificationUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PhabricatorNotificationUIExample.php',
'PhabricatorNotificationsApplication' => 'applications/notification/application/PhabricatorNotificationsApplication.php',
'PhabricatorNuanceApplication' => 'applications/nuance/application/PhabricatorNuanceApplication.php',
'PhabricatorOAuth1AuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorOAuth1AuthProvider.php',
'PhabricatorOAuth2AuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorOAuth2AuthProvider.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthAuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorOAuthAuthProvider.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthClientAuthorization' => 'applications/oauthserver/storage/PhabricatorOAuthClientAuthorization.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthClientAuthorizationQuery' => 'applications/oauthserver/query/PhabricatorOAuthClientAuthorizationQuery.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthClientController' => 'applications/oauthserver/controller/client/PhabricatorOAuthClientController.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthClientDeleteController' => 'applications/oauthserver/controller/client/PhabricatorOAuthClientDeleteController.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthClientEditController' => 'applications/oauthserver/controller/client/PhabricatorOAuthClientEditController.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthClientListController' => 'applications/oauthserver/controller/client/PhabricatorOAuthClientListController.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthClientSecretController' => 'applications/oauthserver/controller/client/PhabricatorOAuthClientSecretController.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthClientViewController' => 'applications/oauthserver/controller/client/PhabricatorOAuthClientViewController.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthResponse' => 'applications/oauthserver/PhabricatorOAuthResponse.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServer' => 'applications/oauthserver/PhabricatorOAuthServer.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerAccessToken' => 'applications/oauthserver/storage/PhabricatorOAuthServerAccessToken.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerApplication' => 'applications/oauthserver/application/PhabricatorOAuthServerApplication.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerAuthController' => 'applications/oauthserver/controller/PhabricatorOAuthServerAuthController.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerAuthorizationCode' => 'applications/oauthserver/storage/PhabricatorOAuthServerAuthorizationCode.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerAuthorizationsSettingsPanel' => 'applications/oauthserver/panel/PhabricatorOAuthServerAuthorizationsSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerClient' => 'applications/oauthserver/storage/PhabricatorOAuthServerClient.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerClientAuthorizationPHIDType' => 'applications/oauthserver/phid/PhabricatorOAuthServerClientAuthorizationPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerClientPHIDType' => 'applications/oauthserver/phid/PhabricatorOAuthServerClientPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerClientQuery' => 'applications/oauthserver/query/PhabricatorOAuthServerClientQuery.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerClientSearchEngine' => 'applications/oauthserver/query/PhabricatorOAuthServerClientSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerController' => 'applications/oauthserver/controller/PhabricatorOAuthServerController.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerCreateClientsCapability' => 'applications/oauthserver/capability/PhabricatorOAuthServerCreateClientsCapability.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerDAO' => 'applications/oauthserver/storage/PhabricatorOAuthServerDAO.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerScope' => 'applications/oauthserver/PhabricatorOAuthServerScope.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerTestCase' => 'applications/oauthserver/__tests__/PhabricatorOAuthServerTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerTestController' => 'applications/oauthserver/controller/PhabricatorOAuthServerTestController.php',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerTokenController' => 'applications/oauthserver/controller/PhabricatorOAuthServerTokenController.php',
'PhabricatorObjectHandle' => 'applications/phid/PhabricatorObjectHandle.php',
'PhabricatorObjectHasAsanaSubtaskEdgeType' => 'applications/doorkeeper/edge/PhabricatorObjectHasAsanaSubtaskEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorObjectHasAsanaTaskEdgeType' => 'applications/doorkeeper/edge/PhabricatorObjectHasAsanaTaskEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorObjectHasContributorEdgeType' => 'applications/transactions/edges/PhabricatorObjectHasContributorEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorObjectHasFileEdgeType' => 'applications/transactions/edges/PhabricatorObjectHasFileEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorObjectHasJiraIssueEdgeType' => 'applications/doorkeeper/edge/PhabricatorObjectHasJiraIssueEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorObjectHasSubscriberEdgeType' => 'applications/transactions/edges/PhabricatorObjectHasSubscriberEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorObjectHasUnsubscriberEdgeType' => 'applications/transactions/edges/PhabricatorObjectHasUnsubscriberEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorObjectHasWatcherEdgeType' => 'applications/transactions/edges/PhabricatorObjectHasWatcherEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorObjectListQuery' => 'applications/phid/query/PhabricatorObjectListQuery.php',
'PhabricatorObjectListQueryTestCase' => 'applications/phid/query/__tests__/PhabricatorObjectListQueryTestCase.php',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver' => 'applications/metamta/receiver/PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver.php',
'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiverTestCase' => 'applications/metamta/receiver/__tests__/PhabricatorObjectMailReceiverTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorObjectMentionedByObjectEdgeType' => 'applications/transactions/edges/PhabricatorObjectMentionedByObjectEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorObjectMentionsObjectEdgeType' => 'applications/transactions/edges/PhabricatorObjectMentionsObjectEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorObjectQuery' => 'applications/phid/query/PhabricatorObjectQuery.php',
'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule' => 'infrastructure/markup/rule/PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule.php',
'PhabricatorObjectSelectorDialog' => 'view/control/PhabricatorObjectSelectorDialog.php',
'PhabricatorObjectUsesCredentialsEdgeType' => 'applications/transactions/edges/PhabricatorObjectUsesCredentialsEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorOffsetPagedQuery' => 'infrastructure/query/PhabricatorOffsetPagedQuery.php',
'PhabricatorOneTimeTriggerClock' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/clock/PhabricatorOneTimeTriggerClock.php',
'PhabricatorOpcodeCacheSpec' => 'applications/cache/spec/PhabricatorOpcodeCacheSpec.php',
'PhabricatorOwnerPathQuery' => 'applications/owners/query/PhabricatorOwnerPathQuery.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersApplication' => 'applications/owners/application/PhabricatorOwnersApplication.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersArchiveController' => 'applications/owners/controller/PhabricatorOwnersArchiveController.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersConfigOptions' => 'applications/owners/config/PhabricatorOwnersConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersConfiguredCustomField' => 'applications/owners/customfield/PhabricatorOwnersConfiguredCustomField.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersController' => 'applications/owners/controller/PhabricatorOwnersController.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersCustomField' => 'applications/owners/customfield/PhabricatorOwnersCustomField.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersCustomFieldNumericIndex' => 'applications/owners/storage/PhabricatorOwnersCustomFieldNumericIndex.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersCustomFieldStorage' => 'applications/owners/storage/PhabricatorOwnersCustomFieldStorage.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersCustomFieldStringIndex' => 'applications/owners/storage/PhabricatorOwnersCustomFieldStringIndex.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersDAO' => 'applications/owners/storage/PhabricatorOwnersDAO.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersDetailController' => 'applications/owners/controller/PhabricatorOwnersDetailController.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersEditController' => 'applications/owners/controller/PhabricatorOwnersEditController.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersListController' => 'applications/owners/controller/PhabricatorOwnersListController.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersOwner' => 'applications/owners/storage/PhabricatorOwnersOwner.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackage' => 'applications/owners/storage/PhabricatorOwnersPackage.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageDatasource' => 'applications/owners/typeahead/PhabricatorOwnersPackageDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageEditEngine' => 'applications/owners/editor/PhabricatorOwnersPackageEditEngine.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageFunctionDatasource' => 'applications/owners/typeahead/PhabricatorOwnersPackageFunctionDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageOwnerDatasource' => 'applications/owners/typeahead/PhabricatorOwnersPackageOwnerDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackagePHIDType' => 'applications/owners/phid/PhabricatorOwnersPackagePHIDType.php',
Add PhabricatorOwnersPackageQuery Summary: This is a step toward unearthing Project queries enough that I can make them policy-aware. Right now, some ProjectQuery callsites do not have reasonable access to the viewer. In particular, Owners packages need to issue Project queries because we allow projects to own packages and resolve project members inside of some package queries. Currently, we have a very unmodern approach to querying packages, with a large number of one-off static load methods: PhabricatorOwnersPackage::loadAffectedPackages() PhabricatorOwnersPackage::loadOwningPackages() PhabricatorOwnersPackage::loadPackagesForPaths() PhabricatorOwnersOwner::loadAllForPackages() PhabricatorOwnersOwner::loadAffiliatedUserPHIDs() PhabricatorOwnersOwner::loadAffiliatedPackages() ConduitAPI_owners_query_Method::queryAll() ConduitAPI_owners_query_Method::queryByOwner() ConduitAPI_owners_query_Method::queryByAffiliatedUser() ConduitAPI_owners_query_Method::queryByPath() We should replace `PhabricatorOwnersOwner` with an Edge and move all of these calls to a Query class. I'm going to try to do as little of this work as I can for now since I'm much more interested in getting a functional policy implementation into other applications, but ProjectQuery needs to be policy-aware before I can do that and I need to dig some at least some of the callsites out enough that I can get a viewer in there without making the code worse than it is. This adds a PhabricatorOwnersPackageQuery class and removes one callsite of one of those static methods. I also intend to dissolve the two separate concepts of an "owner" (direct owner) and an "affiliated user" (indirect owner via project membership) since I think we're always fine with "affiliated users" owners. Test Plan: Loaded home page / audit tool, which use the modified path. Ran queries manually via script. Made sure results included directly owned packages and packages owned through project membership. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, meitros Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T603 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3193
2012-08-08 21:25:11 +02:00
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageQuery' => 'applications/owners/query/PhabricatorOwnersPackageQuery.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageSearchEngine' => 'applications/owners/query/PhabricatorOwnersPackageSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageTestCase' => 'applications/owners/storage/__tests__/PhabricatorOwnersPackageTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageTransaction' => 'applications/owners/storage/PhabricatorOwnersPackageTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageTransactionEditor' => 'applications/owners/editor/PhabricatorOwnersPackageTransactionEditor.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageTransactionQuery' => 'applications/owners/query/PhabricatorOwnersPackageTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersPath' => 'applications/owners/storage/PhabricatorOwnersPath.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersPathsController' => 'applications/owners/controller/PhabricatorOwnersPathsController.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersSchemaSpec' => 'applications/owners/storage/PhabricatorOwnersSchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorOwnersSearchField' => 'applications/owners/searchfield/PhabricatorOwnersSearchField.php',
'PhabricatorPHDConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorPHDConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorPHID' => 'applications/phid/storage/PhabricatorPHID.php',
'PhabricatorPHIDConstants' => 'applications/phid/PhabricatorPHIDConstants.php',
'PhabricatorPHIDInterface' => 'applications/phid/interface/PhabricatorPHIDInterface.php',
'PhabricatorPHIDListEditField' => 'applications/transactions/editfield/PhabricatorPHIDListEditField.php',
'PhabricatorPHIDListEditType' => 'applications/transactions/edittype/PhabricatorPHIDListEditType.php',
'PhabricatorPHIDResolver' => 'applications/phid/resolver/PhabricatorPHIDResolver.php',
'PhabricatorPHIDType' => 'applications/phid/type/PhabricatorPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorPHIDTypeTestCase' => 'applications/phid/type/__tests__/PhabricatorPHIDTypeTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorPHPASTApplication' => 'applications/phpast/application/PhabricatorPHPASTApplication.php',
'PhabricatorPHPConfigSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorPHPConfigSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorPHPMailerConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorPHPMailerConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorPagedFormUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PhabricatorPagedFormUIExample.php',
'PhabricatorPagerUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PhabricatorPagerUIExample.php',
'PhabricatorPassphraseApplication' => 'applications/passphrase/application/PhabricatorPassphraseApplication.php',
'PhabricatorPasswordAuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorPasswordAuthProvider.php',
'PhabricatorPasswordHasher' => 'infrastructure/util/password/PhabricatorPasswordHasher.php',
'PhabricatorPasswordHasherTestCase' => 'infrastructure/util/password/__tests__/PhabricatorPasswordHasherTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorPasswordHasherUnavailableException' => 'infrastructure/util/password/PhabricatorPasswordHasherUnavailableException.php',
'PhabricatorPasswordSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorPasswordSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorPaste' => 'applications/paste/storage/PhabricatorPaste.php',
'PhabricatorPasteApplication' => 'applications/paste/application/PhabricatorPasteApplication.php',
'PhabricatorPasteArchiveController' => 'applications/paste/controller/PhabricatorPasteArchiveController.php',
'PhabricatorPasteConfigOptions' => 'applications/paste/config/PhabricatorPasteConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorPasteController' => 'applications/paste/controller/PhabricatorPasteController.php',
'PhabricatorPasteDAO' => 'applications/paste/storage/PhabricatorPasteDAO.php',
'PhabricatorPasteEditController' => 'applications/paste/controller/PhabricatorPasteEditController.php',
Implement a basic version of ApplicationEditor in Paste Summary: Ref T9132. Ref T4768. This is a rough v0 of ApplicationEditor, which replaces the edit workflow in Paste. This mostly looks and works like ApplicationSearch, and is heavily modeled on it. Roughly, we define a set of editable fields and the ApplicationEditor stuff builds everything else. This has no functional changes, except: - I removed "Fork Paste" since I don't think it's particularly useful now that pastes are editable. We could restore it if users miss it. - Subscribers are now editable. - Form field order is a little goofy (this will be fixed in a future diff). - Subscribers and projects are now race-resistant. The race-resistance works like this: instead of submitting just the new value ("subscribers=apple, dog") and doing a set operation ("set subscribers = apple, dog"), we submit the old and new values ("original=apple" + "new=apple, dog") then apply the user's changes as an add + remove ("add=dog", "remove=<none>"). This means that two users who do "Edit Paste" at around the same time and each add or remove a couple of subscribers won't overwrite each other, unless they actually add or remove the exact same subscribers (in which case their edits legitimately conflict). Previously, the last user to save would win, and whatever was in their field would overwrite the prior state, potentially losing the first user's edits. Test Plan: - Created pastes. - Created pastes via API. - Edited pastes. - Edited every field. - Opened a paste in two windows and did project/subscriber edits in each, saved in arbitrary order, had edits respected. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14390
2015-11-03 03:58:32 +01:00
'PhabricatorPasteEditEngine' => 'applications/paste/editor/PhabricatorPasteEditEngine.php',
'PhabricatorPasteEditor' => 'applications/paste/editor/PhabricatorPasteEditor.php',
'PhabricatorPasteListController' => 'applications/paste/controller/PhabricatorPasteListController.php',
'PhabricatorPastePastePHIDType' => 'applications/paste/phid/PhabricatorPastePastePHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorPasteQuery' => 'applications/paste/query/PhabricatorPasteQuery.php',
'PhabricatorPasteRawController' => 'applications/paste/controller/PhabricatorPasteRawController.php',
'PhabricatorPasteRemarkupRule' => 'applications/paste/remarkup/PhabricatorPasteRemarkupRule.php',
'PhabricatorPasteSchemaSpec' => 'applications/paste/storage/PhabricatorPasteSchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorPasteSearchEngine' => 'applications/paste/query/PhabricatorPasteSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorPasteSnippet' => 'applications/paste/snippet/PhabricatorPasteSnippet.php',
'PhabricatorPasteTestDataGenerator' => 'applications/paste/lipsum/PhabricatorPasteTestDataGenerator.php',
'PhabricatorPasteTransaction' => 'applications/paste/storage/PhabricatorPasteTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorPasteTransactionComment' => 'applications/paste/storage/PhabricatorPasteTransactionComment.php',
'PhabricatorPasteTransactionQuery' => 'applications/paste/query/PhabricatorPasteTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorPasteViewController' => 'applications/paste/controller/PhabricatorPasteViewController.php',
'PhabricatorPathSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorPathSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleAnyOwnerDatasource' => 'applications/people/typeahead/PhabricatorPeopleAnyOwnerDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleApplication' => 'applications/people/application/PhabricatorPeopleApplication.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleApproveController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleApproveController.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleCalendarController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleCalendarController.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleController.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleCreateController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleCreateController.php',
Modernize "users" typeahead datasource Summary: Ref T4420. Modernize users. Test Plan: - Edited "Commit Authors" on Audit search. - Edited "Created By" on calendar search. - Edited "invited" on calendar search. - Edited "To" on "New conpherence message". - Edited user on "Add user to conpherence thread". - Edited "Authors" on countdown search. - Edited "Author" on differential search. - Edited "Responsible users" on differential search. - Edited "Owner" on Diffusion lint search. - Edited "include users" on Feed search. - Edited "Authors" on file search. - Edited "Authors" on Herald rule search. - Edited a couple of user-selecting Herald fields on rules. - Edited "user" on legalpad signature exemption. - Edited "creator" on legalpad search. - Edited "contributors" on legalpad search. - Edited "signers" on legalpad signature search. - Edited "Authors" on macro search. - Edited "Reassign/claim" on task detail. - Edited "assigned to" on task edit. - Edited "assigned to", "users projects", "authors" on task search. - Edited "creators" on oauthserver. - Edited "authors" on paste search. - Edited "actors" and "users" on activity log search. - Edited "authors" on pholio search. - Edited "users" on phrequent search. - Edited "authors", "answered by" on Ponder search. - Edited "add members" on project membership editor. - Edited "members" on project search. - Edited "pushers" on releeph product edit. - Edited "requestors" on releeph request search. - Edited "pushers" on diffusion push log. - Edited "authors", "owners", "subscribers" on global search. - Edited "authors" on slowvote search. - Edited users in custom policy. - Grepped for "common/authors", no hits. - Grepped for "common/users", no (relevant) hits. - Grepped for "common/accounts", no (relevant) hits. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4420 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9885
2014-07-18 00:44:18 +02:00
'PhabricatorPeopleDatasource' => 'applications/people/typeahead/PhabricatorPeopleDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleDeleteController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleDeleteController.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleDisableController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleDisableController.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleEmpowerController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleEmpowerController.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleExternalPHIDType' => 'applications/people/phid/PhabricatorPeopleExternalPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleHovercardEventListener' => 'applications/people/event/PhabricatorPeopleHovercardEventListener.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleInviteController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleInviteController.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleInviteListController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleInviteListController.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleInviteSendController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleInviteSendController.php',
2012-07-04 04:10:38 +02:00
'PhabricatorPeopleLdapController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleLdapController.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleListController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleListController.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleLogQuery' => 'applications/people/query/PhabricatorPeopleLogQuery.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleLogSearchEngine' => 'applications/people/query/PhabricatorPeopleLogSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleLogsController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleLogsController.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleNewController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleNewController.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleNoOwnerDatasource' => 'applications/people/typeahead/PhabricatorPeopleNoOwnerDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleOwnerDatasource' => 'applications/people/typeahead/PhabricatorPeopleOwnerDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleProfileController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleProfileController.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleProfileEditController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleProfileEditController.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleProfilePictureController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleProfilePictureController.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleQuery' => 'applications/people/query/PhabricatorPeopleQuery.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleRenameController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleRenameController.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleSearchEngine' => 'applications/people/query/PhabricatorPeopleSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleTestDataGenerator' => 'applications/people/lipsum/PhabricatorPeopleTestDataGenerator.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleTransactionQuery' => 'applications/people/query/PhabricatorPeopleTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleUserFunctionDatasource' => 'applications/people/typeahead/PhabricatorPeopleUserFunctionDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleUserPHIDType' => 'applications/people/phid/PhabricatorPeopleUserPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorPeopleWelcomeController' => 'applications/people/controller/PhabricatorPeopleWelcomeController.php',
'PhabricatorPersonaAuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorPersonaAuthProvider.php',
'PhabricatorPhabricatorAuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorPhabricatorAuthProvider.php',
'PhabricatorPhameApplication' => 'applications/phame/application/PhabricatorPhameApplication.php',
'PhabricatorPhameBlogPHIDType' => 'applications/phame/phid/PhabricatorPhameBlogPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorPhamePostPHIDType' => 'applications/phame/phid/PhabricatorPhamePostPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorPhluxApplication' => 'applications/phlux/application/PhabricatorPhluxApplication.php',
'PhabricatorPholioApplication' => 'applications/pholio/application/PhabricatorPholioApplication.php',
'PhabricatorPholioConfigOptions' => 'applications/pholio/config/PhabricatorPholioConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorPholioMockTestDataGenerator' => 'applications/pholio/lipsum/PhabricatorPholioMockTestDataGenerator.php',
'PhabricatorPhortuneApplication' => 'applications/phortune/application/PhabricatorPhortuneApplication.php',
'PhabricatorPhortuneManagementInvoiceWorkflow' => 'applications/phortune/management/PhabricatorPhortuneManagementInvoiceWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorPhortuneManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/phortune/management/PhabricatorPhortuneManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorPhragmentApplication' => 'applications/phragment/application/PhabricatorPhragmentApplication.php',
'PhabricatorPhrequentApplication' => 'applications/phrequent/application/PhabricatorPhrequentApplication.php',
'PhabricatorPhrequentConfigOptions' => 'applications/phrequent/config/PhabricatorPhrequentConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorPhrictionApplication' => 'applications/phriction/application/PhabricatorPhrictionApplication.php',
'PhabricatorPhrictionConfigOptions' => 'applications/phriction/config/PhabricatorPhrictionConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlApplication' => 'applications/phurl/application/PhabricatorPhurlApplication.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorPhurlConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlController' => 'applications/phurl/controller/PhabricatorPhurlController.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlDAO' => 'applications/phurl/storage/PhabricatorPhurlDAO.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlLinkRemarkupRule' => 'applications/phurl/remarkup/PhabricatorPhurlLinkRemarkupRule.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlRemarkupRule' => 'applications/phurl/remarkup/PhabricatorPhurlRemarkupRule.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlSchemaSpec' => 'applications/phurl/storage/PhabricatorPhurlSchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlShortURLController' => 'applications/phurl/controller/PhabricatorPhurlShortURLController.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlShortURLDefaultController' => 'applications/phurl/controller/PhabricatorPhurlShortURLDefaultController.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlURL' => 'applications/phurl/storage/PhabricatorPhurlURL.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLAccessController' => 'applications/phurl/controller/PhabricatorPhurlURLAccessController.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLCommentController' => 'applications/phurl/controller/PhabricatorPhurlURLCommentController.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLCreateCapability' => 'applications/phurl/capability/PhabricatorPhurlURLCreateCapability.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLEditController' => 'applications/phurl/controller/PhabricatorPhurlURLEditController.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLEditor' => 'applications/phurl/editor/PhabricatorPhurlURLEditor.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLListController' => 'applications/phurl/controller/PhabricatorPhurlURLListController.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLPHIDType' => 'applications/phurl/phid/PhabricatorPhurlURLPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLQuery' => 'applications/phurl/query/PhabricatorPhurlURLQuery.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLSearchEngine' => 'applications/phurl/query/PhabricatorPhurlURLSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLTransaction' => 'applications/phurl/storage/PhabricatorPhurlURLTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLTransactionComment' => 'applications/phurl/storage/PhabricatorPhurlURLTransactionComment.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLTransactionQuery' => 'applications/phurl/query/PhabricatorPhurlURLTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLViewController' => 'applications/phurl/controller/PhabricatorPhurlURLViewController.php',
'PhabricatorPlatformSite' => 'aphront/site/PhabricatorPlatformSite.php',
'PhabricatorPolicies' => 'applications/policy/constants/PhabricatorPolicies.php',
'PhabricatorPolicy' => 'applications/policy/storage/PhabricatorPolicy.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyApplication' => 'applications/policy/application/PhabricatorPolicyApplication.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyAwareQuery' => 'infrastructure/query/policy/PhabricatorPolicyAwareQuery.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyAwareTestQuery' => 'applications/policy/__tests__/PhabricatorPolicyAwareTestQuery.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyCanEditCapability' => 'applications/policy/capability/PhabricatorPolicyCanEditCapability.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyCanJoinCapability' => 'applications/policy/capability/PhabricatorPolicyCanJoinCapability.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyCanViewCapability' => 'applications/policy/capability/PhabricatorPolicyCanViewCapability.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyCapability' => 'applications/policy/capability/PhabricatorPolicyCapability.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyCapabilityTestCase' => 'applications/policy/capability/__tests__/PhabricatorPolicyCapabilityTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyConfigOptions' => 'applications/policy/config/PhabricatorPolicyConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyConstants' => 'applications/policy/constants/PhabricatorPolicyConstants.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyController' => 'applications/policy/controller/PhabricatorPolicyController.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyDAO' => 'applications/policy/storage/PhabricatorPolicyDAO.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyDataTestCase' => 'applications/policy/__tests__/PhabricatorPolicyDataTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyEditController' => 'applications/policy/controller/PhabricatorPolicyEditController.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyEditEngineExtension' => 'applications/policy/editor/PhabricatorPolicyEditEngineExtension.php',
Implement a basic version of ApplicationEditor in Paste Summary: Ref T9132. Ref T4768. This is a rough v0 of ApplicationEditor, which replaces the edit workflow in Paste. This mostly looks and works like ApplicationSearch, and is heavily modeled on it. Roughly, we define a set of editable fields and the ApplicationEditor stuff builds everything else. This has no functional changes, except: - I removed "Fork Paste" since I don't think it's particularly useful now that pastes are editable. We could restore it if users miss it. - Subscribers are now editable. - Form field order is a little goofy (this will be fixed in a future diff). - Subscribers and projects are now race-resistant. The race-resistance works like this: instead of submitting just the new value ("subscribers=apple, dog") and doing a set operation ("set subscribers = apple, dog"), we submit the old and new values ("original=apple" + "new=apple, dog") then apply the user's changes as an add + remove ("add=dog", "remove=<none>"). This means that two users who do "Edit Paste" at around the same time and each add or remove a couple of subscribers won't overwrite each other, unless they actually add or remove the exact same subscribers (in which case their edits legitimately conflict). Previously, the last user to save would win, and whatever was in their field would overwrite the prior state, potentially losing the first user's edits. Test Plan: - Created pastes. - Created pastes via API. - Edited pastes. - Edited every field. - Opened a paste in two windows and did project/subscriber edits in each, saved in arbitrary order, had edits respected. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14390
2015-11-03 03:58:32 +01:00
'PhabricatorPolicyEditField' => 'applications/transactions/editfield/PhabricatorPolicyEditField.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyException' => 'applications/policy/exception/PhabricatorPolicyException.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyExplainController' => 'applications/policy/controller/PhabricatorPolicyExplainController.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyFilter' => 'applications/policy/filter/PhabricatorPolicyFilter.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface' => 'applications/policy/interface/PhabricatorPolicyInterface.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyManagementShowWorkflow' => 'applications/policy/management/PhabricatorPolicyManagementShowWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyManagementUnlockWorkflow' => 'applications/policy/management/PhabricatorPolicyManagementUnlockWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/policy/management/PhabricatorPolicyManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyPHIDTypePolicy' => 'applications/policy/phid/PhabricatorPolicyPHIDTypePolicy.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyQuery' => 'applications/policy/query/PhabricatorPolicyQuery.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyRequestExceptionHandler' => 'aphront/handler/PhabricatorPolicyRequestExceptionHandler.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyRule' => 'applications/policy/rule/PhabricatorPolicyRule.php',
'PhabricatorPolicySearchEngineExtension' => 'applications/policy/engineextension/PhabricatorPolicySearchEngineExtension.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyTestCase' => 'applications/policy/__tests__/PhabricatorPolicyTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyTestObject' => 'applications/policy/__tests__/PhabricatorPolicyTestObject.php',
'PhabricatorPolicyType' => 'applications/policy/constants/PhabricatorPolicyType.php',
'PhabricatorPonderApplication' => 'applications/ponder/application/PhabricatorPonderApplication.php',
'PhabricatorProject' => 'applications/project/storage/PhabricatorProject.php',
'PhabricatorProjectAddHeraldAction' => 'applications/project/herald/PhabricatorProjectAddHeraldAction.php',
'PhabricatorProjectApplication' => 'applications/project/application/PhabricatorProjectApplication.php',
'PhabricatorProjectArchiveController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectArchiveController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectBoardController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectBoardController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectBoardImportController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectBoardImportController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectBoardReorderController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectBoardReorderController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectBoardViewController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectBoardViewController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectColumn' => 'applications/project/storage/PhabricatorProjectColumn.php',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnDetailController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectColumnDetailController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnEditController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectColumnEditController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnHideController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectColumnHideController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnPHIDType' => 'applications/project/phid/PhabricatorProjectColumnPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnPosition' => 'applications/project/storage/PhabricatorProjectColumnPosition.php',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnPositionQuery' => 'applications/project/query/PhabricatorProjectColumnPositionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnQuery' => 'applications/project/query/PhabricatorProjectColumnQuery.php',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnTransaction' => 'applications/project/storage/PhabricatorProjectColumnTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnTransactionEditor' => 'applications/project/editor/PhabricatorProjectColumnTransactionEditor.php',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnTransactionQuery' => 'applications/project/query/PhabricatorProjectColumnTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorProjectConfigOptions' => 'applications/project/config/PhabricatorProjectConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorProjectConfiguredCustomField' => 'applications/project/customfield/PhabricatorProjectConfiguredCustomField.php',
'PhabricatorProjectController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectCustomField' => 'applications/project/customfield/PhabricatorProjectCustomField.php',
'PhabricatorProjectCustomFieldNumericIndex' => 'applications/project/storage/PhabricatorProjectCustomFieldNumericIndex.php',
'PhabricatorProjectCustomFieldStorage' => 'applications/project/storage/PhabricatorProjectCustomFieldStorage.php',
'PhabricatorProjectCustomFieldStringIndex' => 'applications/project/storage/PhabricatorProjectCustomFieldStringIndex.php',
'PhabricatorProjectDAO' => 'applications/project/storage/PhabricatorProjectDAO.php',
'PhabricatorProjectDatasource' => 'applications/project/typeahead/PhabricatorProjectDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorProjectDescriptionField' => 'applications/project/customfield/PhabricatorProjectDescriptionField.php',
'PhabricatorProjectEditDetailsController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectEditDetailsController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectEditIconController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectEditIconController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectEditPictureController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectEditPictureController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectEditorTestCase' => 'applications/project/editor/__tests__/PhabricatorProjectEditorTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorProjectFeedController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectFeedController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectHeraldAction' => 'applications/project/herald/PhabricatorProjectHeraldAction.php',
'PhabricatorProjectIcon' => 'applications/project/icon/PhabricatorProjectIcon.php',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface' => 'applications/project/interface/PhabricatorProjectInterface.php',
'PhabricatorProjectListController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectListController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectLogicalAndDatasource' => 'applications/project/typeahead/PhabricatorProjectLogicalAndDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorProjectLogicalDatasource' => 'applications/project/typeahead/PhabricatorProjectLogicalDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorProjectLogicalOrNotDatasource' => 'applications/project/typeahead/PhabricatorProjectLogicalOrNotDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorProjectLogicalUserDatasource' => 'applications/project/typeahead/PhabricatorProjectLogicalUserDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorProjectLogicalViewerDatasource' => 'applications/project/typeahead/PhabricatorProjectLogicalViewerDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorProjectMemberOfProjectEdgeType' => 'applications/project/edge/PhabricatorProjectMemberOfProjectEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorProjectMembersDatasource' => 'applications/project/typeahead/PhabricatorProjectMembersDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorProjectMembersEditController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectMembersEditController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectMembersRemoveController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectMembersRemoveController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectMoveController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectMoveController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectNoProjectsDatasource' => 'applications/project/typeahead/PhabricatorProjectNoProjectsDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorProjectObjectHasProjectEdgeType' => 'applications/project/edge/PhabricatorProjectObjectHasProjectEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorProjectOrUserDatasource' => 'applications/project/typeahead/PhabricatorProjectOrUserDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorProjectOrUserFunctionDatasource' => 'applications/project/typeahead/PhabricatorProjectOrUserFunctionDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorProjectPHIDResolver' => 'applications/phid/resolver/PhabricatorProjectPHIDResolver.php',
'PhabricatorProjectProfileController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectProfileController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectProjectHasMemberEdgeType' => 'applications/project/edge/PhabricatorProjectProjectHasMemberEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorProjectProjectHasObjectEdgeType' => 'applications/project/edge/PhabricatorProjectProjectHasObjectEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorProjectProjectPHIDType' => 'applications/project/phid/PhabricatorProjectProjectPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorProjectQuery' => 'applications/project/query/PhabricatorProjectQuery.php',
'PhabricatorProjectRemoveHeraldAction' => 'applications/project/herald/PhabricatorProjectRemoveHeraldAction.php',
'PhabricatorProjectSchemaSpec' => 'applications/project/storage/PhabricatorProjectSchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorProjectSearchEngine' => 'applications/project/query/PhabricatorProjectSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorProjectSearchField' => 'applications/project/searchfield/PhabricatorProjectSearchField.php',
'PhabricatorProjectSearchIndexer' => 'applications/project/search/PhabricatorProjectSearchIndexer.php',
'PhabricatorProjectSlug' => 'applications/project/storage/PhabricatorProjectSlug.php',
'PhabricatorProjectStandardCustomField' => 'applications/project/customfield/PhabricatorProjectStandardCustomField.php',
'PhabricatorProjectStatus' => 'applications/project/constants/PhabricatorProjectStatus.php',
'PhabricatorProjectTestDataGenerator' => 'applications/project/lipsum/PhabricatorProjectTestDataGenerator.php',
'PhabricatorProjectTransaction' => 'applications/project/storage/PhabricatorProjectTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorProjectTransactionEditor' => 'applications/project/editor/PhabricatorProjectTransactionEditor.php',
'PhabricatorProjectTransactionQuery' => 'applications/project/query/PhabricatorProjectTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorProjectUIEventListener' => 'applications/project/events/PhabricatorProjectUIEventListener.php',
'PhabricatorProjectUpdateController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectUpdateController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectUserFunctionDatasource' => 'applications/project/typeahead/PhabricatorProjectUserFunctionDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorProjectViewController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectViewController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectWatchController' => 'applications/project/controller/PhabricatorProjectWatchController.php',
'PhabricatorProjectsEditEngineExtension' => 'applications/project/engineextension/PhabricatorProjectsEditEngineExtension.php',
'PhabricatorProjectsEditField' => 'applications/transactions/editfield/PhabricatorProjectsEditField.php',
'PhabricatorProjectsPolicyRule' => 'applications/project/policyrule/PhabricatorProjectsPolicyRule.php',
'PhabricatorProjectsSearchEngineExtension' => 'applications/project/engineextension/PhabricatorProjectsSearchEngineExtension.php',
'PhabricatorProtocolAdapter' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/adapter/PhabricatorProtocolAdapter.php',
'PhabricatorPygmentSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorPygmentSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorQuery' => 'infrastructure/query/PhabricatorQuery.php',
'PhabricatorQueryConstraint' => 'infrastructure/query/constraint/PhabricatorQueryConstraint.php',
'PhabricatorQueryOrderItem' => 'infrastructure/query/order/PhabricatorQueryOrderItem.php',
'PhabricatorQueryOrderTestCase' => 'infrastructure/query/order/__tests__/PhabricatorQueryOrderTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorQueryOrderVector' => 'infrastructure/query/order/PhabricatorQueryOrderVector.php',
'PhabricatorRateLimitRequestExceptionHandler' => 'aphront/handler/PhabricatorRateLimitRequestExceptionHandler.php',
'PhabricatorRecaptchaConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorRecaptchaConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorRecipientHasBadgeEdgeType' => 'applications/badges/edge/PhabricatorRecipientHasBadgeEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorRedirectController' => 'applications/base/controller/PhabricatorRedirectController.php',
'PhabricatorRefreshCSRFController' => 'applications/auth/controller/PhabricatorRefreshCSRFController.php',
New Registration Workflow Summary: Currently, registration and authentication are pretty messy. Two concrete problems: - The `PhabricatorLDAPRegistrationController` and `PhabricatorOAuthDefaultRegistrationController` controllers are giant copy/pastes of one another. This is really bad. - We can't practically implement OpenID because we can't reissue the authentication request. Additionally, the OAuth registration controller can be replaced wholesale by config, which is a huge API surface area and a giant mess. Broadly, the problem right now is that registration does too much: we hand it some set of indirect credentials (like OAuth tokens) and expect it to take those the entire way to a registered user. Instead, break registration into smaller steps: - User authenticates with remote service. - Phabricator pulls information (remote account ID, username, email, real name, profile picture, etc) from the remote service and saves it as `PhabricatorUserCredentials`. - Phabricator hands the `PhabricatorUserCredentials` to the registration form, which is agnostic about where they originate from: it can process LDAP credentials, OAuth credentials, plain old email credentials, HTTP basic auth credentials, etc. This doesn't do anything yet -- there is no way to create credentials objects (and no storage patch), but I wanted to get any initial feedback, especially about the event call for T2394. In particular, I think the implementation would look something like this: $profile = $event->getValue('profile') $username = $profile->getDefaultUsername(); $is_employee = is_this_a_facebook_employee($username); if (!$is_employee) { throw new Exception("You are not employed at Facebook."); } $fbid = get_fbid_for_facebook_username($username); $profile->setDefaultEmail($fbid); $profile->setCanEditUsername(false); $profile->setCanEditEmail(false); $profile->setCanEditRealName(false); $profile->setShouldVerifyEmail(true); Seem reasonable? Test Plan: N/A yet, probably fatals. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, codeblock, chad Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, asherkin, nh, wez Maniphest Tasks: T1536, T2394 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4647
2013-06-16 19:13:49 +02:00
'PhabricatorRegistrationProfile' => 'applications/people/storage/PhabricatorRegistrationProfile.php',
'PhabricatorReleephApplication' => 'applications/releeph/application/PhabricatorReleephApplication.php',
'PhabricatorReleephApplicationConfigOptions' => 'applications/releeph/config/PhabricatorReleephApplicationConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorRemarkupControl' => 'view/form/control/PhabricatorRemarkupControl.php',
'PhabricatorRemarkupCowsayBlockInterpreter' => 'infrastructure/markup/interpreter/PhabricatorRemarkupCowsayBlockInterpreter.php',
'PhabricatorRemarkupCustomBlockRule' => 'infrastructure/markup/rule/PhabricatorRemarkupCustomBlockRule.php',
'PhabricatorRemarkupCustomInlineRule' => 'infrastructure/markup/rule/PhabricatorRemarkupCustomInlineRule.php',
'PhabricatorRemarkupEditField' => 'applications/transactions/editfield/PhabricatorRemarkupEditField.php',
'PhabricatorRemarkupFigletBlockInterpreter' => 'infrastructure/markup/interpreter/PhabricatorRemarkupFigletBlockInterpreter.php',
'PhabricatorRemarkupUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PhabricatorRemarkupUIExample.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoriesSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorRepositoriesSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorRepository' => 'applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepository.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryAuditRequest' => 'applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepositoryAuditRequest.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryBranch' => 'applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepositoryBranch.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommit' => 'applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepositoryCommit.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitChangeParserWorker' => 'applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser/PhabricatorRepositoryCommitChangeParserWorker.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitData' => 'applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepositoryCommitData.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitHeraldWorker' => 'applications/repository/worker/PhabricatorRepositoryCommitHeraldWorker.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitMessageParserWorker' => 'applications/repository/worker/commitmessageparser/PhabricatorRepositoryCommitMessageParserWorker.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitOwnersWorker' => 'applications/repository/worker/PhabricatorRepositoryCommitOwnersWorker.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitPHIDType' => 'applications/repository/phid/PhabricatorRepositoryCommitPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitParserWorker' => 'applications/repository/worker/PhabricatorRepositoryCommitParserWorker.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitRef' => 'applications/repository/engine/PhabricatorRepositoryCommitRef.php',
Improve Search architecture Summary: The search indexing API has several problems right now: - Always runs in-process. - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it. - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster. - Instead, make the API phid-oriented. - No uniform indexing API. - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird. - Instead, provide a uniform API. - No uniform CLI. - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers. - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing. - Not application-oriented. - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world. - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader. Test Plan: - `bin/search index` - Indexed one revision, one task. - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types. - Indexed `--all`. - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it. - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing. - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing. - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: 20after4, aran Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 23:21:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitSearchIndexer' => 'applications/repository/search/PhabricatorRepositoryCommitSearchIndexer.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryConfigOptions' => 'applications/repository/config/PhabricatorRepositoryConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryDAO' => 'applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepositoryDAO.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryDiscoveryEngine' => 'applications/repository/engine/PhabricatorRepositoryDiscoveryEngine.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryEditor' => 'applications/repository/editor/PhabricatorRepositoryEditor.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryEngine' => 'applications/repository/engine/PhabricatorRepositoryEngine.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryGitCommitChangeParserWorker' => 'applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser/PhabricatorRepositoryGitCommitChangeParserWorker.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryGitCommitMessageParserWorker' => 'applications/repository/worker/commitmessageparser/PhabricatorRepositoryGitCommitMessageParserWorker.php',
Implement a chunked, APC-backed graph cache Summary: Ref T2683. This is a refinement and simplification of D5257. In particular: - D5257 only cached the commit chain, not path changes. This meant that we had to go issue an awkward query (which was slow on Facebook's install) periodically while reading the cache. This was reasonable locally but killed performance at FB scale. Instead, we can include path information in the cache. It is very rare that this is large except in Subversion, and we do not need to use this cache in Subversion. In other VCSes, the scale of this data is quite small (a handful of bytes per commit on average). - D5257 required a large, slow offline computation step. This relies on D9044 to populate parent data so we can build the cache online at will, and let it expire with normal LRU/LFU/whatever semantics. We need this parent data for other reasons anyway. - D5257 separated graph chunks per-repository. This change assumes we'll be able to pull stuff from APC most of the time and that the cost of switching chunks is not very large, so we can just build one chunk cache across all repositories. This allows the cache to be simpler. - D5257 needed an offline cache, and used a unique cache structure. Since this one can be built online it can mostly use normal cache code. - This also supports online appends to the cache. - Finally, this has a timeout to guarantee a ceiling on the worst case: the worst case is something like a query for a file that has never existed, in a repository which receives exactly 1 commit every time other repositories receive 4095 commits, on a cold cache. If we hit cases like this we can bail after warming the cache up a bit and fall back to asking the VCS for an answer. This cache isn't perfect, but I believe it will give us substantial gains in the average case. It can often satisfy "average-looking" queries in 4-8ms, and pathological-ish queries in 20ms on my machine; `hg` usually can't even start up in less than 100ms. The major thing that's attractive about this approach is that it does not require anything external or complicated, and will "just work", even producing reasonble improvements for users without APC. In followups, I'll modify queries to use this cache and see if it holds up in more realistic workloads. Test Plan: - Used `bin/repository cache` to examine the behavior of this cache. - Did some profiling/testing from the web UI using `debug.php`. - This //appears// to provide a reasonable fast way to issue this query very quickly in the average case, without the various issues that plagued D5257. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley, jhurwitz Maniphest Tasks: T2683 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9045
2014-05-10 19:10:13 +02:00
'PhabricatorRepositoryGraphCache' => 'applications/repository/graphcache/PhabricatorRepositoryGraphCache.php',
Move Git discovery into DiscoveryEngine Summary: Ref T4327. Consolidates and simplifies infrastructure: - Moves Git discovery into DiscoveryEngine. - Collapses a bunch of the Git and Mercurial code related to stream discovery. - Removes all cach code from PullLocal daemon (it's no longer called). - Adds basic unit tests for Git and Mercurial discovery. Various cleanup: - Makes GitStream and MercurialStream extend a common base. - Improves performance of MercurialStream in some cases, by requiring fewer commits be output and parsed. - Makes mirroring exceptions easier to debug. - Fixes discovery of Mercurial repositories with multiple branch heads. - Adds some missing `pht()`. Test Plan: I tested this fairly throughly because I think this phase is complete: - Made new repositories in multiple VCSes and did full imports. - Particularly, I reimported Arcanist to make sure that TODO was resolved. I think it was related to the toposort stuff. - Pushed commits to multiple VCSes. - Pushed commits to a non-close branch, then pushed a merge commit. Observed commits import initially as non-close, then get flagged for close. - Started full daemons and resolved various minor issues that showed up in the daemon log until everything ran cleanly. - Basically spent about 30 minutes banging on this in every way I could think of to try to break it. I found and fixed some minor stuff, but it seems solid. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T4327 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7987
2014-01-17 00:31:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorRepositoryGraphStream' => 'applications/repository/daemon/PhabricatorRepositoryGraphStream.php',
Implement a chunked, APC-backed graph cache Summary: Ref T2683. This is a refinement and simplification of D5257. In particular: - D5257 only cached the commit chain, not path changes. This meant that we had to go issue an awkward query (which was slow on Facebook's install) periodically while reading the cache. This was reasonable locally but killed performance at FB scale. Instead, we can include path information in the cache. It is very rare that this is large except in Subversion, and we do not need to use this cache in Subversion. In other VCSes, the scale of this data is quite small (a handful of bytes per commit on average). - D5257 required a large, slow offline computation step. This relies on D9044 to populate parent data so we can build the cache online at will, and let it expire with normal LRU/LFU/whatever semantics. We need this parent data for other reasons anyway. - D5257 separated graph chunks per-repository. This change assumes we'll be able to pull stuff from APC most of the time and that the cost of switching chunks is not very large, so we can just build one chunk cache across all repositories. This allows the cache to be simpler. - D5257 needed an offline cache, and used a unique cache structure. Since this one can be built online it can mostly use normal cache code. - This also supports online appends to the cache. - Finally, this has a timeout to guarantee a ceiling on the worst case: the worst case is something like a query for a file that has never existed, in a repository which receives exactly 1 commit every time other repositories receive 4095 commits, on a cold cache. If we hit cases like this we can bail after warming the cache up a bit and fall back to asking the VCS for an answer. This cache isn't perfect, but I believe it will give us substantial gains in the average case. It can often satisfy "average-looking" queries in 4-8ms, and pathological-ish queries in 20ms on my machine; `hg` usually can't even start up in less than 100ms. The major thing that's attractive about this approach is that it does not require anything external or complicated, and will "just work", even producing reasonble improvements for users without APC. In followups, I'll modify queries to use this cache and see if it holds up in more realistic workloads. Test Plan: - Used `bin/repository cache` to examine the behavior of this cache. - Did some profiling/testing from the web UI using `debug.php`. - This //appears// to provide a reasonable fast way to issue this query very quickly in the average case, without the various issues that plagued D5257. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley, jhurwitz Maniphest Tasks: T2683 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9045
2014-05-10 19:10:13 +02:00
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementCacheWorkflow' => 'applications/repository/management/PhabricatorRepositoryManagementCacheWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementDiscoverWorkflow' => 'applications/repository/management/PhabricatorRepositoryManagementDiscoverWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementEditWorkflow' => 'applications/repository/management/PhabricatorRepositoryManagementEditWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementImportingWorkflow' => 'applications/repository/management/PhabricatorRepositoryManagementImportingWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementListPathsWorkflow' => 'applications/repository/management/PhabricatorRepositoryManagementListPathsWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementListWorkflow' => 'applications/repository/management/PhabricatorRepositoryManagementListWorkflow.php',
Provide a standalone query for resolution of commit author/committer into Phabricator users Summary: Ref T4195. To implement the "Author" and "Committer" rules, I need to resolve author/committer strings into Phabricator users. The code to do this is currently buried in the daemons. Extract it into a standalone query. I also added `bin/repository lookup-users <commit>` to test this query, both to improve confidence I'm getting this right and to provide a diagnostic command for users, since there's occasionally some confusion over how author/committer strings resolve into valid users. Test Plan: I tested this using `bin/repository lookup-users` and `reparse.php --message` on Git, Mercurial and SVN commits. Here's the `lookup-users` output: >>> orbital ~/devtools/phabricator $ ./bin/repository lookup-users rINIS3 Examining commit rINIS3... Raw author string: epriestley Phabricator user: epriestley (Evan Priestley ) Raw committer string: null >>> orbital ~/devtools/phabricator $ ./bin/repository lookup-users rPOEMS165b6c54f487c8 Examining commit rPOEMS165b6c54f487... Raw author string: epriestley <git@epriestley.com> Phabricator user: epriestley (Evan Priestley ) Raw committer string: epriestley <git@epriestley.com> Phabricator user: epriestley (Evan Priestley ) >>> orbital ~/devtools/phabricator $ ./bin/repository lookup-users rINIH6d24c1aee7741e Examining commit rINIH6d24c1aee774... Raw author string: epriestley <hg@yghe.net> Phabricator user: epriestley (Evan Priestley ) Raw committer string: null >>> orbital ~/devtools/phabricator $ The `reparse.php` output was similar, and all VCSes resolved authors correctly. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1731, T4195 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7801
2013-12-19 20:05:17 +01:00
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementLookupUsersWorkflow' => 'applications/repository/management/PhabricatorRepositoryManagementLookupUsersWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementMarkImportedWorkflow' => 'applications/repository/management/PhabricatorRepositoryManagementMarkImportedWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementMirrorWorkflow' => 'applications/repository/management/PhabricatorRepositoryManagementMirrorWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementMovePathsWorkflow' => 'applications/repository/management/PhabricatorRepositoryManagementMovePathsWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementParentsWorkflow' => 'applications/repository/management/PhabricatorRepositoryManagementParentsWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementPullWorkflow' => 'applications/repository/management/PhabricatorRepositoryManagementPullWorkflow.php',
Introduce ref cursors for repository parsing Summary: Ref T4327. I want to make change parsing testable; one thing which is blocking this is that the Git discovery process is still part of `PullLocal` daemon instead of being part of `DiscoveryEngine`. The unit test stuff which I want to use for change parsing relies on `DiscoveryEngine` to discover repositories during unit tests. The major reason git discovery isn't part of `DiscoveryEngine` is that it relies on the messy "autoclose" logic, which we never implemented for Mercurial. Generally, I don't like how autoclose was implemented: it's complicated and gross and too hard to figure out and extend. Instead, I want to do something more similar to what we do for pushes, which is cleaner overall. Basically this means remembering the old branch heads from the last time we parsed a repository, and figuring out what's new by comparing the old and new branch heads. This should give us several advantages: - It should be simpler to understand than the autoclose stuff, which is pretty mind-numbing, at least for me. - It will let us satisfy branch and tag queries cheaply (from the database) instead of having to go to the repository. We could also satisfy some ref-resolve queries from the database. - It should be easier to extend to Mercurial. This implements the basics -- pretty much a table to store the cursors, which we update only for Git for now. Test Plan: - Ran migration. - Ran `bin/repository discover X --trace --verbose` on various repositories with branches and tags, before and after modifying pushes. - Pushed commits to a git repo. - Looked at database tables. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T4327 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7982
2014-01-16 21:05:30 +01:00
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementRefsWorkflow' => 'applications/repository/management/PhabricatorRepositoryManagementRefsWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementReparseWorkflow' => 'applications/repository/management/PhabricatorRepositoryManagementReparseWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementUpdateWorkflow' => 'applications/repository/management/PhabricatorRepositoryManagementUpdateWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/repository/management/PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryMercurialCommitChangeParserWorker' => 'applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser/PhabricatorRepositoryMercurialCommitChangeParserWorker.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryMercurialCommitMessageParserWorker' => 'applications/repository/worker/commitmessageparser/PhabricatorRepositoryMercurialCommitMessageParserWorker.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryMirror' => 'applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepositoryMirror.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryMirrorEngine' => 'applications/repository/engine/PhabricatorRepositoryMirrorEngine.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryMirrorPHIDType' => 'applications/repository/phid/PhabricatorRepositoryMirrorPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryMirrorQuery' => 'applications/repository/query/PhabricatorRepositoryMirrorQuery.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryParsedChange' => 'applications/repository/data/PhabricatorRepositoryParsedChange.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPullEngine' => 'applications/repository/engine/PhabricatorRepositoryPullEngine.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPullLocalDaemon' => 'applications/repository/daemon/PhabricatorRepositoryPullLocalDaemon.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushEvent' => 'applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepositoryPushEvent.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushEventPHIDType' => 'applications/repository/phid/PhabricatorRepositoryPushEventPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushEventQuery' => 'applications/repository/query/PhabricatorRepositoryPushEventQuery.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushLog' => 'applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepositoryPushLog.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushLogPHIDType' => 'applications/repository/phid/PhabricatorRepositoryPushLogPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushLogQuery' => 'applications/repository/query/PhabricatorRepositoryPushLogQuery.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushLogSearchEngine' => 'applications/repository/query/PhabricatorRepositoryPushLogSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushMailWorker' => 'applications/repository/worker/PhabricatorRepositoryPushMailWorker.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushReplyHandler' => 'applications/repository/mail/PhabricatorRepositoryPushReplyHandler.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryQuery' => 'applications/repository/query/PhabricatorRepositoryQuery.php',
Introduce ref cursors for repository parsing Summary: Ref T4327. I want to make change parsing testable; one thing which is blocking this is that the Git discovery process is still part of `PullLocal` daemon instead of being part of `DiscoveryEngine`. The unit test stuff which I want to use for change parsing relies on `DiscoveryEngine` to discover repositories during unit tests. The major reason git discovery isn't part of `DiscoveryEngine` is that it relies on the messy "autoclose" logic, which we never implemented for Mercurial. Generally, I don't like how autoclose was implemented: it's complicated and gross and too hard to figure out and extend. Instead, I want to do something more similar to what we do for pushes, which is cleaner overall. Basically this means remembering the old branch heads from the last time we parsed a repository, and figuring out what's new by comparing the old and new branch heads. This should give us several advantages: - It should be simpler to understand than the autoclose stuff, which is pretty mind-numbing, at least for me. - It will let us satisfy branch and tag queries cheaply (from the database) instead of having to go to the repository. We could also satisfy some ref-resolve queries from the database. - It should be easier to extend to Mercurial. This implements the basics -- pretty much a table to store the cursors, which we update only for Git for now. Test Plan: - Ran migration. - Ran `bin/repository discover X --trace --verbose` on various repositories with branches and tags, before and after modifying pushes. - Pushed commits to a git repo. - Looked at database tables. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T4327 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7982
2014-01-16 21:05:30 +01:00
'PhabricatorRepositoryRefCursor' => 'applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepositoryRefCursor.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryRefCursorPHIDType' => 'applications/repository/phid/PhabricatorRepositoryRefCursorPHIDType.php',
Introduce ref cursors for repository parsing Summary: Ref T4327. I want to make change parsing testable; one thing which is blocking this is that the Git discovery process is still part of `PullLocal` daemon instead of being part of `DiscoveryEngine`. The unit test stuff which I want to use for change parsing relies on `DiscoveryEngine` to discover repositories during unit tests. The major reason git discovery isn't part of `DiscoveryEngine` is that it relies on the messy "autoclose" logic, which we never implemented for Mercurial. Generally, I don't like how autoclose was implemented: it's complicated and gross and too hard to figure out and extend. Instead, I want to do something more similar to what we do for pushes, which is cleaner overall. Basically this means remembering the old branch heads from the last time we parsed a repository, and figuring out what's new by comparing the old and new branch heads. This should give us several advantages: - It should be simpler to understand than the autoclose stuff, which is pretty mind-numbing, at least for me. - It will let us satisfy branch and tag queries cheaply (from the database) instead of having to go to the repository. We could also satisfy some ref-resolve queries from the database. - It should be easier to extend to Mercurial. This implements the basics -- pretty much a table to store the cursors, which we update only for Git for now. Test Plan: - Ran migration. - Ran `bin/repository discover X --trace --verbose` on various repositories with branches and tags, before and after modifying pushes. - Pushed commits to a git repo. - Looked at database tables. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T4327 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7982
2014-01-16 21:05:30 +01:00
'PhabricatorRepositoryRefCursorQuery' => 'applications/repository/query/PhabricatorRepositoryRefCursorQuery.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryRefEngine' => 'applications/repository/engine/PhabricatorRepositoryRefEngine.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryRepositoryPHIDType' => 'applications/repository/phid/PhabricatorRepositoryRepositoryPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorRepositorySchemaSpec' => 'applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepositorySchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorRepositorySearchEngine' => 'applications/repository/query/PhabricatorRepositorySearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryStatusMessage' => 'applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepositoryStatusMessage.php',
'PhabricatorRepositorySvnCommitChangeParserWorker' => 'applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser/PhabricatorRepositorySvnCommitChangeParserWorker.php',
'PhabricatorRepositorySvnCommitMessageParserWorker' => 'applications/repository/worker/commitmessageparser/PhabricatorRepositorySvnCommitMessageParserWorker.php',
'PhabricatorRepositorySymbol' => 'applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepositorySymbol.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryTestCase' => 'applications/repository/storage/__tests__/PhabricatorRepositoryTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryTransaction' => 'applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepositoryTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryTransactionQuery' => 'applications/repository/query/PhabricatorRepositoryTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryType' => 'applications/repository/constants/PhabricatorRepositoryType.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryURINormalizer' => 'applications/repository/data/PhabricatorRepositoryURINormalizer.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryURINormalizerTestCase' => 'applications/repository/data/__tests__/PhabricatorRepositoryURINormalizerTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryURITestCase' => 'applications/repository/storage/__tests__/PhabricatorRepositoryURITestCase.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryVCSPassword' => 'applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepositoryVCSPassword.php',
'PhabricatorRepositoryVersion' => 'applications/repository/constants/PhabricatorRepositoryVersion.php',
'PhabricatorRequestExceptionHandler' => 'aphront/handler/PhabricatorRequestExceptionHandler.php',
'PhabricatorResourceSite' => 'aphront/site/PhabricatorResourceSite.php',
'PhabricatorRobotsController' => 'applications/system/controller/PhabricatorRobotsController.php',
'PhabricatorS3FileStorageEngine' => 'applications/files/engine/PhabricatorS3FileStorageEngine.php',
'PhabricatorSMS' => 'infrastructure/sms/storage/PhabricatorSMS.php',
'PhabricatorSMSConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorSMSConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorSMSDAO' => 'infrastructure/sms/storage/PhabricatorSMSDAO.php',
'PhabricatorSMSDemultiplexWorker' => 'infrastructure/sms/worker/PhabricatorSMSDemultiplexWorker.php',
'PhabricatorSMSImplementationAdapter' => 'infrastructure/sms/adapter/PhabricatorSMSImplementationAdapter.php',
'PhabricatorSMSImplementationTestBlackholeAdapter' => 'infrastructure/sms/adapter/PhabricatorSMSImplementationTestBlackholeAdapter.php',
'PhabricatorSMSImplementationTwilioAdapter' => 'infrastructure/sms/adapter/PhabricatorSMSImplementationTwilioAdapter.php',
'PhabricatorSMSManagementListOutboundWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/sms/management/PhabricatorSMSManagementListOutboundWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorSMSManagementSendTestWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/sms/management/PhabricatorSMSManagementSendTestWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorSMSManagementShowOutboundWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/sms/management/PhabricatorSMSManagementShowOutboundWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorSMSManagementWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/sms/management/PhabricatorSMSManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorSMSSendWorker' => 'infrastructure/sms/worker/PhabricatorSMSSendWorker.php',
'PhabricatorSMSWorker' => 'infrastructure/sms/worker/PhabricatorSMSWorker.php',
'PhabricatorSQLPatchList' => 'infrastructure/storage/patch/PhabricatorSQLPatchList.php',
'PhabricatorSSHKeyGenerator' => 'infrastructure/util/PhabricatorSSHKeyGenerator.php',
'PhabricatorSSHKeysSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorSSHKeysSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorSSHLog' => 'infrastructure/log/PhabricatorSSHLog.php',
'PhabricatorSSHPassthruCommand' => 'infrastructure/ssh/PhabricatorSSHPassthruCommand.php',
'PhabricatorSSHPublicKeyInterface' => 'applications/auth/sshkey/PhabricatorSSHPublicKeyInterface.php',
Implement SSHD glue and Conduit SSH endpoint Summary: - Build "sshd-auth" (for authentication) and "sshd-exec" (for command execution) binaries. These are callable by "sshd-vcs", located [[https://github.com/epriestley/sshd-vcs | in my account on GitHub]]. They are based on precursors [[https://github.com/epriestley/sshd-vcs-glue | here on GitHub]] which I deployed for TenXer about a year ago, so I have some confidence they at least basically work. - The problem this solves is that normally every user would need an account on a machine to connect to it, and/or their public keys would all need to be listed in `~/.authorized_keys`. This is a big pain in most installs. Software like Gitosis/Gitolite solve this problem by giving you an easy way to add public keys to `~/.authorized_keys`, but this is pretty gross. - Roughly, instead of looking in `~/.authorized_keys` when a user connects, the patched sshd instead runs `echo <public key> | sshd-auth`. The `sshd-auth` script looks up the public key and authorizes the matching user, if they exist. It also forces sshd to run `sshd-exec` instead of a normal shell. - `sshd-exec` receives the authenticated user and any command which was passed to ssh (like `git receive-pack`) and can route them appropriately. - Overall, this permits a single account to be set up on a server which all Phabricator users can connect to without any extra work, and which can safely execute commands and apply appropriate permissions, and disable users when they are disabled in Phabricator and all that stuff. - Build out "sshd-exec" to do more thorough checks and setup, and delegate command execution to Workflows (they now exist, and did not when I originally built this stuff). - Convert @btrahan's conduit API script into a workflow and slightly simplify it (ConduitCall did not exist at the time it was written). The next steps here on the Repository side are to implement Workflows for Git, SVN and HG wire protocols. These will mostly just proxy the protocols, but also need to enforce permissions. So the approach will basically be: - Implement workflows for stuff like `git receive-pack`. - These workflows will implement enough of the underlying protocol to determine what resource the user is trying to access, and whether they want to read or write it. - They'll then do a permissons check, and kick the user out if they don't have permission to do whatever they are trying to do. - If the user does have permission, we just proxy the rest of the transaction. Next steps on the Conduit side are more simple: - Make ConduitClient understand "ssh://" URLs. Test Plan: Ran `sshd-exec --phabricator-ssh-user epriestley conduit differential.query`, etc. This will get a more comprehensive test once I set up sshd-vcs. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T603, T550 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4229
2012-12-19 20:08:07 +01:00
'PhabricatorSSHWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/ssh/PhabricatorSSHWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorSavedQuery' => 'applications/search/storage/PhabricatorSavedQuery.php',
'PhabricatorSavedQueryQuery' => 'applications/search/query/PhabricatorSavedQueryQuery.php',
'PhabricatorScheduleTaskTriggerAction' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/action/PhabricatorScheduleTaskTriggerAction.php',
'PhabricatorScopedEnv' => 'infrastructure/env/PhabricatorScopedEnv.php',
'PhabricatorSearchAbstractDocument' => 'applications/search/index/PhabricatorSearchAbstractDocument.php',
'PhabricatorSearchApplication' => 'applications/search/application/PhabricatorSearchApplication.php',
'PhabricatorSearchApplicationSearchEngine' => 'applications/search/query/PhabricatorSearchApplicationSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorSearchApplicationStorageEnginePanel' => 'applications/search/applicationpanel/PhabricatorSearchApplicationStorageEnginePanel.php',
'PhabricatorSearchAttachController' => 'applications/search/controller/PhabricatorSearchAttachController.php',
'PhabricatorSearchBaseController' => 'applications/search/controller/PhabricatorSearchBaseController.php',
'PhabricatorSearchCheckboxesField' => 'applications/search/field/PhabricatorSearchCheckboxesField.php',
'PhabricatorSearchConfigOptions' => 'applications/search/config/PhabricatorSearchConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorSearchController' => 'applications/search/controller/PhabricatorSearchController.php',
'PhabricatorSearchCustomFieldProxyField' => 'applications/search/field/PhabricatorSearchCustomFieldProxyField.php',
'PhabricatorSearchDAO' => 'applications/search/storage/PhabricatorSearchDAO.php',
'PhabricatorSearchDatasource' => 'applications/search/typeahead/PhabricatorSearchDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorSearchDatasourceField' => 'applications/search/field/PhabricatorSearchDatasourceField.php',
'PhabricatorSearchDateControlField' => 'applications/search/field/PhabricatorSearchDateControlField.php',
'PhabricatorSearchDateField' => 'applications/search/field/PhabricatorSearchDateField.php',
'PhabricatorSearchDeleteController' => 'applications/search/controller/PhabricatorSearchDeleteController.php',
'PhabricatorSearchDocument' => 'applications/search/storage/document/PhabricatorSearchDocument.php',
'PhabricatorSearchDocumentField' => 'applications/search/storage/document/PhabricatorSearchDocumentField.php',
'PhabricatorSearchDocumentFieldType' => 'applications/search/constants/PhabricatorSearchDocumentFieldType.php',
Improve Search architecture Summary: The search indexing API has several problems right now: - Always runs in-process. - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it. - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster. - Instead, make the API phid-oriented. - No uniform indexing API. - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird. - Instead, provide a uniform API. - No uniform CLI. - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers. - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing. - Not application-oriented. - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world. - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader. Test Plan: - `bin/search index` - Indexed one revision, one task. - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types. - Indexed `--all`. - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it. - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing. - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing. - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: 20after4, aran Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 23:21:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorSearchDocumentIndexer' => 'applications/search/index/PhabricatorSearchDocumentIndexer.php',
'PhabricatorSearchDocumentQuery' => 'applications/search/query/PhabricatorSearchDocumentQuery.php',
'PhabricatorSearchDocumentRelationship' => 'applications/search/storage/document/PhabricatorSearchDocumentRelationship.php',
'PhabricatorSearchDocumentTypeDatasource' => 'applications/search/typeahead/PhabricatorSearchDocumentTypeDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorSearchEditController' => 'applications/search/controller/PhabricatorSearchEditController.php',
'PhabricatorSearchEngine' => 'applications/search/engine/PhabricatorSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorSearchEngineAPIMethod' => 'applications/search/engine/PhabricatorSearchEngineAPIMethod.php',
'PhabricatorSearchEngineExtension' => 'applications/search/engineextension/PhabricatorSearchEngineExtension.php',
'PhabricatorSearchEngineExtensionModule' => 'applications/search/engineextension/PhabricatorSearchEngineExtensionModule.php',
'PhabricatorSearchEngineTestCase' => 'applications/search/engine/__tests__/PhabricatorSearchEngineTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorSearchField' => 'applications/search/field/PhabricatorSearchField.php',
'PhabricatorSearchHovercardController' => 'applications/search/controller/PhabricatorSearchHovercardController.php',
Improve Search architecture Summary: The search indexing API has several problems right now: - Always runs in-process. - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it. - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster. - Instead, make the API phid-oriented. - No uniform indexing API. - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird. - Instead, provide a uniform API. - No uniform CLI. - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers. - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing. - Not application-oriented. - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world. - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader. Test Plan: - `bin/search index` - Indexed one revision, one task. - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types. - Indexed `--all`. - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it. - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing. - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing. - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: 20after4, aran Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 23:21:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorSearchIndexer' => 'applications/search/index/PhabricatorSearchIndexer.php',
'PhabricatorSearchManagementIndexWorkflow' => 'applications/search/management/PhabricatorSearchManagementIndexWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorSearchManagementInitWorkflow' => 'applications/search/management/PhabricatorSearchManagementInitWorkflow.php',
Improve Search architecture Summary: The search indexing API has several problems right now: - Always runs in-process. - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it. - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster. - Instead, make the API phid-oriented. - No uniform indexing API. - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird. - Instead, provide a uniform API. - No uniform CLI. - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers. - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing. - Not application-oriented. - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world. - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader. Test Plan: - `bin/search index` - Indexed one revision, one task. - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types. - Indexed `--all`. - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it. - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing. - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing. - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: 20after4, aran Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 23:21:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorSearchManagementWorkflow' => 'applications/search/management/PhabricatorSearchManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorSearchOrderController' => 'applications/search/controller/PhabricatorSearchOrderController.php',
'PhabricatorSearchOrderField' => 'applications/search/field/PhabricatorSearchOrderField.php',
'PhabricatorSearchPreferencesSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorSearchPreferencesSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorSearchRelationship' => 'applications/search/constants/PhabricatorSearchRelationship.php',
'PhabricatorSearchResultView' => 'applications/search/view/PhabricatorSearchResultView.php',
'PhabricatorSearchSelectController' => 'applications/search/controller/PhabricatorSearchSelectController.php',
'PhabricatorSearchSelectField' => 'applications/search/field/PhabricatorSearchSelectField.php',
'PhabricatorSearchStringListField' => 'applications/search/field/PhabricatorSearchStringListField.php',
'PhabricatorSearchSubscribersField' => 'applications/search/field/PhabricatorSearchSubscribersField.php',
'PhabricatorSearchTextField' => 'applications/search/field/PhabricatorSearchTextField.php',
'PhabricatorSearchThreeStateField' => 'applications/search/field/PhabricatorSearchThreeStateField.php',
'PhabricatorSearchTokenizerField' => 'applications/search/field/PhabricatorSearchTokenizerField.php',
'PhabricatorSearchWorker' => 'applications/search/worker/PhabricatorSearchWorker.php',
'PhabricatorSecurityConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorSecurityConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorSecuritySetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorSecuritySetupCheck.php',
Implement a basic version of ApplicationEditor in Paste Summary: Ref T9132. Ref T4768. This is a rough v0 of ApplicationEditor, which replaces the edit workflow in Paste. This mostly looks and works like ApplicationSearch, and is heavily modeled on it. Roughly, we define a set of editable fields and the ApplicationEditor stuff builds everything else. This has no functional changes, except: - I removed "Fork Paste" since I don't think it's particularly useful now that pastes are editable. We could restore it if users miss it. - Subscribers are now editable. - Form field order is a little goofy (this will be fixed in a future diff). - Subscribers and projects are now race-resistant. The race-resistance works like this: instead of submitting just the new value ("subscribers=apple, dog") and doing a set operation ("set subscribers = apple, dog"), we submit the old and new values ("original=apple" + "new=apple, dog") then apply the user's changes as an add + remove ("add=dog", "remove=<none>"). This means that two users who do "Edit Paste" at around the same time and each add or remove a couple of subscribers won't overwrite each other, unless they actually add or remove the exact same subscribers (in which case their edits legitimately conflict). Previously, the last user to save would win, and whatever was in their field would overwrite the prior state, potentially losing the first user's edits. Test Plan: - Created pastes. - Created pastes via API. - Edited pastes. - Edited every field. - Opened a paste in two windows and did project/subscriber edits in each, saved in arbitrary order, had edits respected. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14390
2015-11-03 03:58:32 +01:00
'PhabricatorSelectEditField' => 'applications/transactions/editfield/PhabricatorSelectEditField.php',
'PhabricatorSendGridConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorSendGridConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorSessionsSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorSessionsSettingsPanel.php',
Add semi-generic rate limiting infrastructure Summary: This adds a system which basically keeps a record of recent actions, who took them, and how many "points" they were worth, like: epriestley email.add 1 1233989813 epriestley email.add 1 1234298239 epriestley email.add 1 1238293981 We can use this to rate-limit actions by examining how many actions the user has taken in the past hour (i.e., their total score) and comparing that to an allowed limit. One major thing I want to use this for is to limit the amount of error email we'll send to an email address. A big concern I have with sending more error email is that we'll end up in loops. We have some protections against this in headers already, but hard-limiting the system so it won't send more than a few errors to a particular address per hour should provide a reasonable secondary layer of protection. This use case (where the "actor" needs to be an email address) is why the table uses strings + hashes instead of PHIDs. For external users, it might be appropriate to rate limit by cookies or IPs, too. To prove it works, I rate limited adding email addresses. This is a very, very low-risk security thing where a user with an account can enumerate addresses (by checking if they get an error) and sort of spam/annoy people (by adding their address over and over again). Limiting them to 6 actions / hour should satisfy all real users while preventing these behaviors. Test Plan: This dialog is uggos but I'll fix that in a sec: {F137406} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8683
2014-04-03 20:22:38 +02:00
'PhabricatorSettingsAddEmailAction' => 'applications/settings/action/PhabricatorSettingsAddEmailAction.php',
'PhabricatorSettingsAdjustController' => 'applications/settings/controller/PhabricatorSettingsAdjustController.php',
'PhabricatorSettingsApplication' => 'applications/settings/application/PhabricatorSettingsApplication.php',
'PhabricatorSettingsMainController' => 'applications/settings/controller/PhabricatorSettingsMainController.php',
'PhabricatorSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorSetupCheckTestCase' => 'applications/config/check/__tests__/PhabricatorSetupCheckTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorSetupIssue' => 'applications/config/issue/PhabricatorSetupIssue.php',
'PhabricatorSetupIssueUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PhabricatorSetupIssueUIExample.php',
'PhabricatorSetupIssueView' => 'applications/config/view/PhabricatorSetupIssueView.php',
'PhabricatorShortSite' => 'aphront/site/PhabricatorShortSite.php',
'PhabricatorSimpleEditType' => 'applications/transactions/edittype/PhabricatorSimpleEditType.php',
'PhabricatorSite' => 'aphront/site/PhabricatorSite.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteApplication' => 'applications/slowvote/application/PhabricatorSlowvoteApplication.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteChoice' => 'applications/slowvote/storage/PhabricatorSlowvoteChoice.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteCloseController' => 'applications/slowvote/controller/PhabricatorSlowvoteCloseController.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteCommentController' => 'applications/slowvote/controller/PhabricatorSlowvoteCommentController.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteController' => 'applications/slowvote/controller/PhabricatorSlowvoteController.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteDAO' => 'applications/slowvote/storage/PhabricatorSlowvoteDAO.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteDefaultViewCapability' => 'applications/slowvote/capability/PhabricatorSlowvoteDefaultViewCapability.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteEditController' => 'applications/slowvote/controller/PhabricatorSlowvoteEditController.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteEditor' => 'applications/slowvote/editor/PhabricatorSlowvoteEditor.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteListController' => 'applications/slowvote/controller/PhabricatorSlowvoteListController.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteMailReceiver' => 'applications/slowvote/mail/PhabricatorSlowvoteMailReceiver.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteOption' => 'applications/slowvote/storage/PhabricatorSlowvoteOption.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvotePoll' => 'applications/slowvote/storage/PhabricatorSlowvotePoll.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvotePollController' => 'applications/slowvote/controller/PhabricatorSlowvotePollController.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvotePollPHIDType' => 'applications/slowvote/phid/PhabricatorSlowvotePollPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteQuery' => 'applications/slowvote/query/PhabricatorSlowvoteQuery.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteReplyHandler' => 'applications/slowvote/mail/PhabricatorSlowvoteReplyHandler.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteSchemaSpec' => 'applications/slowvote/storage/PhabricatorSlowvoteSchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteSearchEngine' => 'applications/slowvote/query/PhabricatorSlowvoteSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteTransaction' => 'applications/slowvote/storage/PhabricatorSlowvoteTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteTransactionComment' => 'applications/slowvote/storage/PhabricatorSlowvoteTransactionComment.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteTransactionQuery' => 'applications/slowvote/query/PhabricatorSlowvoteTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteVoteController' => 'applications/slowvote/controller/PhabricatorSlowvoteVoteController.php',
'PhabricatorSlug' => 'infrastructure/util/PhabricatorSlug.php',
'PhabricatorSlugTestCase' => 'infrastructure/util/__tests__/PhabricatorSlugTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorSortTableUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PhabricatorSortTableUIExample.php',
'PhabricatorSourceCodeView' => 'view/layout/PhabricatorSourceCodeView.php',
Implement a basic version of ApplicationEditor in Paste Summary: Ref T9132. Ref T4768. This is a rough v0 of ApplicationEditor, which replaces the edit workflow in Paste. This mostly looks and works like ApplicationSearch, and is heavily modeled on it. Roughly, we define a set of editable fields and the ApplicationEditor stuff builds everything else. This has no functional changes, except: - I removed "Fork Paste" since I don't think it's particularly useful now that pastes are editable. We could restore it if users miss it. - Subscribers are now editable. - Form field order is a little goofy (this will be fixed in a future diff). - Subscribers and projects are now race-resistant. The race-resistance works like this: instead of submitting just the new value ("subscribers=apple, dog") and doing a set operation ("set subscribers = apple, dog"), we submit the old and new values ("original=apple" + "new=apple, dog") then apply the user's changes as an add + remove ("add=dog", "remove=<none>"). This means that two users who do "Edit Paste" at around the same time and each add or remove a couple of subscribers won't overwrite each other, unless they actually add or remove the exact same subscribers (in which case their edits legitimately conflict). Previously, the last user to save would win, and whatever was in their field would overwrite the prior state, potentially losing the first user's edits. Test Plan: - Created pastes. - Created pastes via API. - Edited pastes. - Edited every field. - Opened a paste in two windows and did project/subscriber edits in each, saved in arbitrary order, had edits respected. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14390
2015-11-03 03:58:32 +01:00
'PhabricatorSpaceEditField' => 'applications/transactions/editfield/PhabricatorSpaceEditField.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesApplication' => 'applications/spaces/application/PhabricatorSpacesApplication.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesArchiveController' => 'applications/spaces/controller/PhabricatorSpacesArchiveController.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesCapabilityCreateSpaces' => 'applications/spaces/capability/PhabricatorSpacesCapabilityCreateSpaces.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesCapabilityDefaultEdit' => 'applications/spaces/capability/PhabricatorSpacesCapabilityDefaultEdit.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesCapabilityDefaultView' => 'applications/spaces/capability/PhabricatorSpacesCapabilityDefaultView.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesController' => 'applications/spaces/controller/PhabricatorSpacesController.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesDAO' => 'applications/spaces/storage/PhabricatorSpacesDAO.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesEditController' => 'applications/spaces/controller/PhabricatorSpacesEditController.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesInterface' => 'applications/spaces/interface/PhabricatorSpacesInterface.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesListController' => 'applications/spaces/controller/PhabricatorSpacesListController.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesNamespace' => 'applications/spaces/storage/PhabricatorSpacesNamespace.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceDatasource' => 'applications/spaces/typeahead/PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceEditor' => 'applications/spaces/editor/PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceEditor.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesNamespacePHIDType' => 'applications/spaces/phid/PhabricatorSpacesNamespacePHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceQuery' => 'applications/spaces/query/PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceQuery.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceSearchEngine' => 'applications/spaces/query/PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceTransaction' => 'applications/spaces/storage/PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceTransactionQuery' => 'applications/spaces/query/PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesNoAccessController' => 'applications/spaces/controller/PhabricatorSpacesNoAccessController.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesRemarkupRule' => 'applications/spaces/remarkup/PhabricatorSpacesRemarkupRule.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesSchemaSpec' => 'applications/spaces/storage/PhabricatorSpacesSchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesSearchEngineExtension' => 'applications/spaces/engineextension/PhabricatorSpacesSearchEngineExtension.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesSearchField' => 'applications/spaces/searchfield/PhabricatorSpacesSearchField.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesTestCase' => 'applications/spaces/__tests__/PhabricatorSpacesTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorSpacesViewController' => 'applications/spaces/controller/PhabricatorSpacesViewController.php',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomField' => 'infrastructure/customfield/standard/PhabricatorStandardCustomField.php',
Rough cut of "Blueprint Authorizations" Summary: Ref T9519. This is like 80% of the way there and doesn't fully work yet, but roughly shows the shape of things to come. Here's how it works: First, there's a new custom field type for blueprints which works like a normal typeahead but has some extra logic. It's implemented this way to make it easy to add to Blueprints in Drydock and Build Plans in Harbormaster. Here, I've added a "Use Blueprints" field to the "WorkingCopy" blueprint, so you can control which hosts the working copies are permitted to allocate on: {F869865} This control has a bit of custom rendering logic. Instead of rendering a normal list of PHIDs, it renders an annotated list with icons: {F869866} These icons show whether the blueprint on the other size of the authorization has approved this object. Once you have a green checkmark, you're good to go. On the blueprint side, things look like this: {F869867} This table shows all the objects which have asked for access to this blueprint. In this case it's showing that one object is approved to use the blueprint since I already approved it, but by default new requests come in here as "Authorization Requested" and someone has to go approve them. You approve them from within the authorization detail screen: {F869868} You can use the "Approve" or "Decline" buttons to allow or prevent use of the blueprint. This doesn't actually do anything yet -- objects don't need to be authorized in order to use blueprints quite yet. That will come in the next diff, I just wanted to get the UI in reasonable shape first. The authorization also has a second piece of state, which is whether the request from the object is active or inactive. We use this to keep track of the authorization if the blueprint is (maybe temporarily) deleted. For example, you might have a Build Plan that uses Blueprints A and B. For a couple days, you only want to use A, so you remove B from the "Use Blueprints: ..." field. Later, you can add B back and it will connect to its old authorization again, so you don't need to go re-approve things (and if you're declined, you stay declined instead of being able to request authorization over and over again). This should make working with authorizations a little easier and less labor intensive. Stuff not in this diff: - Actually preventing any allocations (next diff). - Probably should have transactions for approve/decline, at least, at some point, so there's a log of who did approvals and when. - Maybe should have a more clear/loud error state when no blueprints are approved? - Should probably restrict the typeahead to specific blueprint types. Test Plan: - Added the field. - Typed some stuff into it. - Saw the UI update properly. - Approved an authorization. - Declined an authorization. - Saw active authorizations on a blueprint page. - Didn't see any inactive authroizations there. - Clicked "View All Authorizations", saw all authorizations. Reviewers: chad, hach-que Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9519 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14251
2015-10-10 16:15:25 +02:00
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldBlueprints' => 'infrastructure/customfield/standard/PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldBlueprints.php',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldBool' => 'infrastructure/customfield/standard/PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldBool.php',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldCredential' => 'infrastructure/customfield/standard/PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldCredential.php',
Provide a generic "Datasource" StandardCustomField Summary: Ref T9253. See discussion in D13843. I want to let Drydock blueprints for Almanac services choose those services from a typeahead, but only list appropriate services in the typeahead. To do this: - Provide a StandardCustomField for an arbitrary datasource. - Adjust the AlmanacServiceDatasource to allow filtering by service class. This implementation is substantially the same as the one in D13843, with some adjustments: - I lifted most of the code in the `Users` standard custom field into a new `Tokenizer` standard custom field. - The `Users` and `Datasource` custom fields now extend the `Tokenizer` custom field and can share most of the code it uses. - I exposed this field fully as a configurable field. I don't think anyone will ever use it, but this generality costs us nearly nothing and improves consistency. - The code in D13843 didn't actually pass the parameters over the wire, since the object that responds to the request is not the same object that renders the field. Use the "parameters" mechanism in datasources to get things passed over the wire. Test Plan: - Created a custom "users" field in Maniphest and made sure it still wokred. - Created a custom "almanc services" field in Maniphest and selected some services for a task. - With additional changes from D13843, selected an appropriate Almanac service in a new Drydock blueprint. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: hach-que, chad Maniphest Tasks: T9253 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14111
2015-09-21 13:41:52 +02:00
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldDatasource' => 'infrastructure/customfield/standard/PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldDate' => 'infrastructure/customfield/standard/PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldDate.php',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldHeader' => 'infrastructure/customfield/standard/PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldHeader.php',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldInt' => 'infrastructure/customfield/standard/PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldInt.php',
Support configuration-driven custom fields Summary: Ref T1702. Ref T3718. There are a couple of things going on here: **PhabricatorCustomFieldList**: I added `PhabricatorCustomFieldList`, which is just a convenience class for dealing with lists of fields. Often, current field code does something like this inline in a Controller: foreach ($fields as $field) { // do some junk } Often, that junk has some slightly subtle implications. Move all of it to `$list->doSomeJunk()` methods (like `appendFieldsToForm()`, `loadFieldsFromStorage()`) to reduce code duplication and prevent errors. This additionally moves an existing list-convenience method there, out of `PhabricatorPropertyListView`. **PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage**: Adds `PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage` for storing custom field data (like "ICQ Handle", "Phone Number", "Desk", "Favorite Flower", etc). **Configuration-Driven Custom Fields**: Previously, I was thinking about doing these with interfaces, but as I thought about it more I started to dislike that approach. Instead, I built proxies into `PhabricatorCustomField`. Basically, this means that fields (like a custom, configuration-driven "Favorite Flower" field) can just use some other Field to actually provide their implementation (like a "standard" field which knows how to render text areas). The previous approach would have involed subclasssing the "standard" field and implementing an interface, but that would mean that every application would have at least two "base" fields and generally just seemed bleh as I worked through it. The cost of this approach is that we need a bunch of `proxy` junk in the base class, but that's a one-time cost and I think it simplifies all the implementations and makes them a lot less magical (e.g., all of the custom fields now extend the right base field classes). **Fixed Some Bugs**: Some of this code hadn't really been run yet and had minor bugs. Test Plan: {F54240} {F54241} {F54242} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1702, T1703, T3718 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6749
2013-08-14 17:10:16 +02:00
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldInterface' => 'infrastructure/customfield/interface/PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldInterface.php',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldLink' => 'infrastructure/customfield/standard/PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldLink.php',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldPHIDs' => 'infrastructure/customfield/standard/PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldPHIDs.php',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldRemarkup' => 'infrastructure/customfield/standard/PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldRemarkup.php',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldSelect' => 'infrastructure/customfield/standard/PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldSelect.php',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldText' => 'infrastructure/customfield/standard/PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldText.php',
Provide a generic "Datasource" StandardCustomField Summary: Ref T9253. See discussion in D13843. I want to let Drydock blueprints for Almanac services choose those services from a typeahead, but only list appropriate services in the typeahead. To do this: - Provide a StandardCustomField for an arbitrary datasource. - Adjust the AlmanacServiceDatasource to allow filtering by service class. This implementation is substantially the same as the one in D13843, with some adjustments: - I lifted most of the code in the `Users` standard custom field into a new `Tokenizer` standard custom field. - The `Users` and `Datasource` custom fields now extend the `Tokenizer` custom field and can share most of the code it uses. - I exposed this field fully as a configurable field. I don't think anyone will ever use it, but this generality costs us nearly nothing and improves consistency. - The code in D13843 didn't actually pass the parameters over the wire, since the object that responds to the request is not the same object that renders the field. Use the "parameters" mechanism in datasources to get things passed over the wire. Test Plan: - Created a custom "users" field in Maniphest and made sure it still wokred. - Created a custom "almanc services" field in Maniphest and selected some services for a task. - With additional changes from D13843, selected an appropriate Almanac service in a new Drydock blueprint. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: hach-que, chad Maniphest Tasks: T9253 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14111
2015-09-21 13:41:52 +02:00
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldTokenizer' => 'infrastructure/customfield/standard/PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldTokenizer.php',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldUsers' => 'infrastructure/customfield/standard/PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldUsers.php',
'PhabricatorStandardPageView' => 'view/page/PhabricatorStandardPageView.php',
'PhabricatorStandardSelectCustomFieldDatasource' => 'infrastructure/customfield/datasource/PhabricatorStandardSelectCustomFieldDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorStatusController' => 'applications/system/controller/PhabricatorStatusController.php',
'PhabricatorStatusUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PhabricatorStatusUIExample.php',
'PhabricatorStorageFixtureScopeGuard' => 'infrastructure/testing/fixture/PhabricatorStorageFixtureScopeGuard.php',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementAPI' => 'infrastructure/storage/management/PhabricatorStorageManagementAPI.php',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementAdjustWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/storage/management/workflow/PhabricatorStorageManagementAdjustWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementDatabasesWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/storage/management/workflow/PhabricatorStorageManagementDatabasesWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementDestroyWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/storage/management/workflow/PhabricatorStorageManagementDestroyWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementDumpWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/storage/management/workflow/PhabricatorStorageManagementDumpWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementProbeWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/storage/management/workflow/PhabricatorStorageManagementProbeWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementQuickstartWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/storage/management/workflow/PhabricatorStorageManagementQuickstartWorkflow.php',
Add a `storage renamespace` for mangling SQL dumpfiles into a new namespace Summary: Ref T7149. When users give us dumpfiles for import, they will almost inevitably use the `phabricator` namespace. They need to be renamed to use an instance namespace. We can do this either by: - importing the data first, then renaming; or - renaming first, then importing. This implements the second one, basically `storage renamespace --in dump.sql --from phabricator --to instancename > instance.sql`. Renaming first is a little hackier since we have to `preg_match()` a SQL dump file, but I think it's better overall: - With only one database, it lets you dump/import without downtime. - If you have development stuff in a development environment in the `phabricator` namespace, you don't have to move it aside to do an import. - No possibility that two people doing an import at the same time on the same box will collide with each other. - You can do the rename once and then repeat the import process with the renamed dump more easily. - No tricky stuff with modern Phabricator running against an old dump and the database names not matching up. None of this is super important, but it just makes large dumps a bit easier to work with, and the dumpfile format is regular enough that this seems unlikely to ever really not work. Test Plan: Renamespaced a dump, did a `diff -u`, saw all the relevant parts changed (and only those parts changed). Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7149 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12105
2015-03-18 02:29:01 +01:00
'PhabricatorStorageManagementRenamespaceWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/storage/management/workflow/PhabricatorStorageManagementRenamespaceWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementShellWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/storage/management/workflow/PhabricatorStorageManagementShellWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementStatusWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/storage/management/workflow/PhabricatorStorageManagementStatusWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementUpgradeWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/storage/management/workflow/PhabricatorStorageManagementUpgradeWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/storage/management/workflow/PhabricatorStorageManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorStoragePatch' => 'infrastructure/storage/management/PhabricatorStoragePatch.php',
'PhabricatorStorageSchemaSpec' => 'infrastructure/storage/schema/PhabricatorStorageSchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorStorageSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorStorageSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorStreamingProtocolAdapter' => 'infrastructure/daemon/bot/adapter/PhabricatorStreamingProtocolAdapter.php',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface' => 'applications/subscriptions/interface/PhabricatorSubscribableInterface.php',
'PhabricatorSubscribedToObjectEdgeType' => 'applications/transactions/edges/PhabricatorSubscribedToObjectEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorSubscribersEditField' => 'applications/transactions/editfield/PhabricatorSubscribersEditField.php',
'PhabricatorSubscribersQuery' => 'applications/subscriptions/query/PhabricatorSubscribersQuery.php',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionTriggerClock' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/clock/PhabricatorSubscriptionTriggerClock.php',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsAddSelfHeraldAction' => 'applications/subscriptions/herald/PhabricatorSubscriptionsAddSelfHeraldAction.php',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsAddSubscribersHeraldAction' => 'applications/subscriptions/herald/PhabricatorSubscriptionsAddSubscribersHeraldAction.php',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsApplication' => 'applications/subscriptions/application/PhabricatorSubscriptionsApplication.php',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsEditController' => 'applications/subscriptions/controller/PhabricatorSubscriptionsEditController.php',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsEditEngineExtension' => 'applications/subscriptions/engineextension/PhabricatorSubscriptionsEditEngineExtension.php',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsEditor' => 'applications/subscriptions/editor/PhabricatorSubscriptionsEditor.php',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsHeraldAction' => 'applications/subscriptions/herald/PhabricatorSubscriptionsHeraldAction.php',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsListController' => 'applications/subscriptions/controller/PhabricatorSubscriptionsListController.php',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsRemoveSelfHeraldAction' => 'applications/subscriptions/herald/PhabricatorSubscriptionsRemoveSelfHeraldAction.php',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsRemoveSubscribersHeraldAction' => 'applications/subscriptions/herald/PhabricatorSubscriptionsRemoveSubscribersHeraldAction.php',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsSearchEngineExtension' => 'applications/subscriptions/engineextension/PhabricatorSubscriptionsSearchEngineExtension.php',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsSubscribeEmailCommand' => 'applications/subscriptions/command/PhabricatorSubscriptionsSubscribeEmailCommand.php',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsSubscribersPolicyRule' => 'applications/subscriptions/policyrule/PhabricatorSubscriptionsSubscribersPolicyRule.php',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsTransactionController' => 'applications/subscriptions/controller/PhabricatorSubscriptionsTransactionController.php',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsUIEventListener' => 'applications/subscriptions/events/PhabricatorSubscriptionsUIEventListener.php',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsUnsubscribeEmailCommand' => 'applications/subscriptions/command/PhabricatorSubscriptionsUnsubscribeEmailCommand.php',
'PhabricatorSupportApplication' => 'applications/support/application/PhabricatorSupportApplication.php',
'PhabricatorSyntaxHighlighter' => 'infrastructure/markup/PhabricatorSyntaxHighlighter.php',
'PhabricatorSyntaxHighlightingConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorSyntaxHighlightingConfigOptions.php',
Add semi-generic rate limiting infrastructure Summary: This adds a system which basically keeps a record of recent actions, who took them, and how many "points" they were worth, like: epriestley email.add 1 1233989813 epriestley email.add 1 1234298239 epriestley email.add 1 1238293981 We can use this to rate-limit actions by examining how many actions the user has taken in the past hour (i.e., their total score) and comparing that to an allowed limit. One major thing I want to use this for is to limit the amount of error email we'll send to an email address. A big concern I have with sending more error email is that we'll end up in loops. We have some protections against this in headers already, but hard-limiting the system so it won't send more than a few errors to a particular address per hour should provide a reasonable secondary layer of protection. This use case (where the "actor" needs to be an email address) is why the table uses strings + hashes instead of PHIDs. For external users, it might be appropriate to rate limit by cookies or IPs, too. To prove it works, I rate limited adding email addresses. This is a very, very low-risk security thing where a user with an account can enumerate addresses (by checking if they get an error) and sort of spam/annoy people (by adding their address over and over again). Limiting them to 6 actions / hour should satisfy all real users while preventing these behaviors. Test Plan: This dialog is uggos but I'll fix that in a sec: {F137406} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8683
2014-04-03 20:22:38 +02:00
'PhabricatorSystemAction' => 'applications/system/action/PhabricatorSystemAction.php',
'PhabricatorSystemActionEngine' => 'applications/system/engine/PhabricatorSystemActionEngine.php',
'PhabricatorSystemActionGarbageCollector' => 'applications/system/garbagecollector/PhabricatorSystemActionGarbageCollector.php',
'PhabricatorSystemActionLog' => 'applications/system/storage/PhabricatorSystemActionLog.php',
'PhabricatorSystemActionRateLimitException' => 'applications/system/exception/PhabricatorSystemActionRateLimitException.php',
'PhabricatorSystemApplication' => 'applications/system/application/PhabricatorSystemApplication.php',
Add semi-generic rate limiting infrastructure Summary: This adds a system which basically keeps a record of recent actions, who took them, and how many "points" they were worth, like: epriestley email.add 1 1233989813 epriestley email.add 1 1234298239 epriestley email.add 1 1238293981 We can use this to rate-limit actions by examining how many actions the user has taken in the past hour (i.e., their total score) and comparing that to an allowed limit. One major thing I want to use this for is to limit the amount of error email we'll send to an email address. A big concern I have with sending more error email is that we'll end up in loops. We have some protections against this in headers already, but hard-limiting the system so it won't send more than a few errors to a particular address per hour should provide a reasonable secondary layer of protection. This use case (where the "actor" needs to be an email address) is why the table uses strings + hashes instead of PHIDs. For external users, it might be appropriate to rate limit by cookies or IPs, too. To prove it works, I rate limited adding email addresses. This is a very, very low-risk security thing where a user with an account can enumerate addresses (by checking if they get an error) and sort of spam/annoy people (by adding their address over and over again). Limiting them to 6 actions / hour should satisfy all real users while preventing these behaviors. Test Plan: This dialog is uggos but I'll fix that in a sec: {F137406} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8683
2014-04-03 20:22:38 +02:00
'PhabricatorSystemDAO' => 'applications/system/storage/PhabricatorSystemDAO.php',
'PhabricatorSystemDestructionGarbageCollector' => 'applications/system/garbagecollector/PhabricatorSystemDestructionGarbageCollector.php',
'PhabricatorSystemDestructionLog' => 'applications/system/storage/PhabricatorSystemDestructionLog.php',
'PhabricatorSystemRemoveDestroyWorkflow' => 'applications/system/management/PhabricatorSystemRemoveDestroyWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorSystemRemoveLogWorkflow' => 'applications/system/management/PhabricatorSystemRemoveLogWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorSystemRemoveWorkflow' => 'applications/system/management/PhabricatorSystemRemoveWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorSystemSelectEncodingController' => 'applications/system/controller/PhabricatorSystemSelectEncodingController.php',
'PhabricatorSystemSelectHighlightController' => 'applications/system/controller/PhabricatorSystemSelectHighlightController.php',
'PhabricatorTOTPAuthFactor' => 'applications/auth/factor/PhabricatorTOTPAuthFactor.php',
'PhabricatorTOTPAuthFactorTestCase' => 'applications/auth/factor/__tests__/PhabricatorTOTPAuthFactorTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorTaskmasterDaemon' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/PhabricatorTaskmasterDaemon.php',
'PhabricatorTestApplication' => 'applications/base/controller/__tests__/PhabricatorTestApplication.php',
'PhabricatorTestCase' => 'infrastructure/testing/PhabricatorTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorTestController' => 'applications/base/controller/__tests__/PhabricatorTestController.php',
'PhabricatorTestDataGenerator' => 'applications/lipsum/generator/PhabricatorTestDataGenerator.php',
'PhabricatorTestNoCycleEdgeType' => 'applications/transactions/edges/PhabricatorTestNoCycleEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorTestStorageEngine' => 'applications/files/engine/PhabricatorTestStorageEngine.php',
'PhabricatorTestWorker' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/__tests__/PhabricatorTestWorker.php',
Implement a basic version of ApplicationEditor in Paste Summary: Ref T9132. Ref T4768. This is a rough v0 of ApplicationEditor, which replaces the edit workflow in Paste. This mostly looks and works like ApplicationSearch, and is heavily modeled on it. Roughly, we define a set of editable fields and the ApplicationEditor stuff builds everything else. This has no functional changes, except: - I removed "Fork Paste" since I don't think it's particularly useful now that pastes are editable. We could restore it if users miss it. - Subscribers are now editable. - Form field order is a little goofy (this will be fixed in a future diff). - Subscribers and projects are now race-resistant. The race-resistance works like this: instead of submitting just the new value ("subscribers=apple, dog") and doing a set operation ("set subscribers = apple, dog"), we submit the old and new values ("original=apple" + "new=apple, dog") then apply the user's changes as an add + remove ("add=dog", "remove=<none>"). This means that two users who do "Edit Paste" at around the same time and each add or remove a couple of subscribers won't overwrite each other, unless they actually add or remove the exact same subscribers (in which case their edits legitimately conflict). Previously, the last user to save would win, and whatever was in their field would overwrite the prior state, potentially losing the first user's edits. Test Plan: - Created pastes. - Created pastes via API. - Edited pastes. - Edited every field. - Opened a paste in two windows and did project/subscriber edits in each, saved in arbitrary order, had edits respected. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14390
2015-11-03 03:58:32 +01:00
'PhabricatorTextAreaEditField' => 'applications/transactions/editfield/PhabricatorTextAreaEditField.php',
'PhabricatorTextEditField' => 'applications/transactions/editfield/PhabricatorTextEditField.php',
'PhabricatorTime' => 'infrastructure/time/PhabricatorTime.php',
'PhabricatorTimeGuard' => 'infrastructure/time/PhabricatorTimeGuard.php',
'PhabricatorTimeTestCase' => 'infrastructure/time/__tests__/PhabricatorTimeTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorTimezoneSetupCheck' => 'applications/config/check/PhabricatorTimezoneSetupCheck.php',
'PhabricatorToken' => 'applications/tokens/storage/PhabricatorToken.php',
'PhabricatorTokenController' => 'applications/tokens/controller/PhabricatorTokenController.php',
'PhabricatorTokenCount' => 'applications/tokens/storage/PhabricatorTokenCount.php',
'PhabricatorTokenCountQuery' => 'applications/tokens/query/PhabricatorTokenCountQuery.php',
'PhabricatorTokenDAO' => 'applications/tokens/storage/PhabricatorTokenDAO.php',
'PhabricatorTokenGiveController' => 'applications/tokens/controller/PhabricatorTokenGiveController.php',
'PhabricatorTokenGiven' => 'applications/tokens/storage/PhabricatorTokenGiven.php',
'PhabricatorTokenGivenController' => 'applications/tokens/controller/PhabricatorTokenGivenController.php',
'PhabricatorTokenGivenEditor' => 'applications/tokens/editor/PhabricatorTokenGivenEditor.php',
'PhabricatorTokenGivenFeedStory' => 'applications/tokens/feed/PhabricatorTokenGivenFeedStory.php',
'PhabricatorTokenGivenQuery' => 'applications/tokens/query/PhabricatorTokenGivenQuery.php',
'PhabricatorTokenLeaderController' => 'applications/tokens/controller/PhabricatorTokenLeaderController.php',
'PhabricatorTokenQuery' => 'applications/tokens/query/PhabricatorTokenQuery.php',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface' => 'applications/tokens/interface/PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface.php',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverQuery' => 'applications/tokens/query/PhabricatorTokenReceiverQuery.php',
'PhabricatorTokenTokenPHIDType' => 'applications/tokens/phid/PhabricatorTokenTokenPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorTokenUIEventListener' => 'applications/tokens/event/PhabricatorTokenUIEventListener.php',
Implement a basic version of ApplicationEditor in Paste Summary: Ref T9132. Ref T4768. This is a rough v0 of ApplicationEditor, which replaces the edit workflow in Paste. This mostly looks and works like ApplicationSearch, and is heavily modeled on it. Roughly, we define a set of editable fields and the ApplicationEditor stuff builds everything else. This has no functional changes, except: - I removed "Fork Paste" since I don't think it's particularly useful now that pastes are editable. We could restore it if users miss it. - Subscribers are now editable. - Form field order is a little goofy (this will be fixed in a future diff). - Subscribers and projects are now race-resistant. The race-resistance works like this: instead of submitting just the new value ("subscribers=apple, dog") and doing a set operation ("set subscribers = apple, dog"), we submit the old and new values ("original=apple" + "new=apple, dog") then apply the user's changes as an add + remove ("add=dog", "remove=<none>"). This means that two users who do "Edit Paste" at around the same time and each add or remove a couple of subscribers won't overwrite each other, unless they actually add or remove the exact same subscribers (in which case their edits legitimately conflict). Previously, the last user to save would win, and whatever was in their field would overwrite the prior state, potentially losing the first user's edits. Test Plan: - Created pastes. - Created pastes via API. - Edited pastes. - Edited every field. - Opened a paste in two windows and did project/subscriber edits in each, saved in arbitrary order, had edits respected. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14390
2015-11-03 03:58:32 +01:00
'PhabricatorTokenizerEditField' => 'applications/transactions/editfield/PhabricatorTokenizerEditField.php',
'PhabricatorTokensApplication' => 'applications/tokens/application/PhabricatorTokensApplication.php',
'PhabricatorTokensSettingsPanel' => 'applications/settings/panel/PhabricatorTokensSettingsPanel.php',
'PhabricatorTooltipUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PhabricatorTooltipUIExample.php',
'PhabricatorTransactions' => 'applications/transactions/constants/PhabricatorTransactions.php',
'PhabricatorTransactionsApplication' => 'applications/transactions/application/PhabricatorTransactionsApplication.php',
'PhabricatorTransformedFile' => 'applications/files/storage/PhabricatorTransformedFile.php',
'PhabricatorTranslationsConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorTranslationsConfigOptions.php',
Implement clock/trigger infrastructure for scheduling actions Summary: Ref T6881. Hopefully, this is the hard part. This adds a new daemon (the "trigger" daemon) which processes triggers, schedules them, and then executes them at the scheduled time. The design is a little complicated, but has these goals: - High resistance to race conditions: only the application writes to the trigger table; only the daemon writes to the event table. We won't lose events if someone saves a meeting at the same time as we're sending a reminder out for it. - Execution guarantees: scheduled events are guaranteed to execute exactly once. - Support for arbitrarily large queues: the daemon will make progress even if there are millions of triggers in queue. The cost to update the queue is proportional to the number of changes in it; the cost to process the queue is proportional to the number of events to execute. - Relatively good observability: you can monitor the state of the trigger queue reasonably well from the web UI. - Modular Infrastructure: this is a very low-level construct that Calendar, Phortune, etc., should be able to build on top of. It doesn't have this stuff yet: - Not very robust to bad actions: a misbehaving trigger can stop the queue fairly easily. This is OK for now since we aren't planning to make it part of any other applications for a while. We do still get execute-exaclty-once, but it might not happen for a long time (until someone goes and fixes the queue), when we could theoretically continue executing other events. - Doesn't start automatically: normal users don't need to run this thing yet so I'm not starting it by default. - Not super well tested: I've vetted the basics but haven't run real workloads through this yet. - No sophisticated tooling: I added some basic stuff but it's missing some pieces we'll have to build sooner or later, e.g. `bin/trigger cancel` or whatever. - Intentionally not realtime: This design puts execution guarantees far above realtime concerns, and will not give you precise event execution at 1-second resolution. I think this is the correct goal to pursue architecturally, and certainly correct for subscriptions and meeting reminders. Events which execute after they have become irrelevant can simply decline to do anything (like a meeting reminder which executes after the meeting is over). In general, the expectation for applications is: - When creating an object (like a calendar event) that needs to trigger a scheduled action, write a trigger (and save the PHID if you plan to update it later). - The daemon will process the event and schedule the action efficiently, in a race-free way. - If you want to move the action, update the trigger and the daemon will take care of it. - Your action will eventually dump a task into the task queue, and the task daemons will actually perform it. Test Plan: Using a test script like this: ``` <?php require_once 'scripts/__init_script__.php'; $trigger = id(new PhabricatorWorkerTrigger()) ->setAction( new PhabricatorLogTriggerAction( array( 'message' => 'test', ))) ->setClock( new PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock( array( 'period' => 33, ))) ->save(); var_dump($trigger); ``` ...I queued triggers and ran the daemon: - Verified triggers fire; - verified triggers reschedule; - verified trigger events show up in the web UI; - tried different periods; - added some triggers while the daemon was running; - examined `phd debug` output for anything suspicious. It seems to work in trivial use case, at least. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T6881 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11419
2015-01-16 21:13:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorTriggerAction' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/action/PhabricatorTriggerAction.php',
'PhabricatorTriggerClock' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/clock/PhabricatorTriggerClock.php',
'PhabricatorTriggerClockTestCase' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/clock/__tests__/PhabricatorTriggerClockTestCase.php',
Implement clock/trigger infrastructure for scheduling actions Summary: Ref T6881. Hopefully, this is the hard part. This adds a new daemon (the "trigger" daemon) which processes triggers, schedules them, and then executes them at the scheduled time. The design is a little complicated, but has these goals: - High resistance to race conditions: only the application writes to the trigger table; only the daemon writes to the event table. We won't lose events if someone saves a meeting at the same time as we're sending a reminder out for it. - Execution guarantees: scheduled events are guaranteed to execute exactly once. - Support for arbitrarily large queues: the daemon will make progress even if there are millions of triggers in queue. The cost to update the queue is proportional to the number of changes in it; the cost to process the queue is proportional to the number of events to execute. - Relatively good observability: you can monitor the state of the trigger queue reasonably well from the web UI. - Modular Infrastructure: this is a very low-level construct that Calendar, Phortune, etc., should be able to build on top of. It doesn't have this stuff yet: - Not very robust to bad actions: a misbehaving trigger can stop the queue fairly easily. This is OK for now since we aren't planning to make it part of any other applications for a while. We do still get execute-exaclty-once, but it might not happen for a long time (until someone goes and fixes the queue), when we could theoretically continue executing other events. - Doesn't start automatically: normal users don't need to run this thing yet so I'm not starting it by default. - Not super well tested: I've vetted the basics but haven't run real workloads through this yet. - No sophisticated tooling: I added some basic stuff but it's missing some pieces we'll have to build sooner or later, e.g. `bin/trigger cancel` or whatever. - Intentionally not realtime: This design puts execution guarantees far above realtime concerns, and will not give you precise event execution at 1-second resolution. I think this is the correct goal to pursue architecturally, and certainly correct for subscriptions and meeting reminders. Events which execute after they have become irrelevant can simply decline to do anything (like a meeting reminder which executes after the meeting is over). In general, the expectation for applications is: - When creating an object (like a calendar event) that needs to trigger a scheduled action, write a trigger (and save the PHID if you plan to update it later). - The daemon will process the event and schedule the action efficiently, in a race-free way. - If you want to move the action, update the trigger and the daemon will take care of it. - Your action will eventually dump a task into the task queue, and the task daemons will actually perform it. Test Plan: Using a test script like this: ``` <?php require_once 'scripts/__init_script__.php'; $trigger = id(new PhabricatorWorkerTrigger()) ->setAction( new PhabricatorLogTriggerAction( array( 'message' => 'test', ))) ->setClock( new PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock( array( 'period' => 33, ))) ->save(); var_dump($trigger); ``` ...I queued triggers and ran the daemon: - Verified triggers fire; - verified triggers reschedule; - verified trigger events show up in the web UI; - tried different periods; - added some triggers while the daemon was running; - examined `phd debug` output for anything suspicious. It seems to work in trivial use case, at least. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T6881 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11419
2015-01-16 21:13:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorTriggerDaemon' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/PhabricatorTriggerDaemon.php',
'PhabricatorTrivialTestCase' => 'infrastructure/testing/__tests__/PhabricatorTrivialTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorTwitchAuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorTwitchAuthProvider.php',
'PhabricatorTwitterAuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorTwitterAuthProvider.php',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadApplication' => 'applications/typeahead/application/PhabricatorTypeaheadApplication.php',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource' => 'applications/typeahead/datasource/PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource' => 'applications/typeahead/datasource/PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasourceController' => 'applications/typeahead/controller/PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasourceController.php',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadFunctionHelpController' => 'applications/typeahead/controller/PhabricatorTypeaheadFunctionHelpController.php',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadInvalidTokenException' => 'applications/typeahead/exception/PhabricatorTypeaheadInvalidTokenException.php',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadModularDatasourceController' => 'applications/typeahead/controller/PhabricatorTypeaheadModularDatasourceController.php',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadMonogramDatasource' => 'applications/typeahead/datasource/PhabricatorTypeaheadMonogramDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadResult' => 'applications/typeahead/storage/PhabricatorTypeaheadResult.php',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadRuntimeCompositeDatasource' => 'applications/typeahead/datasource/PhabricatorTypeaheadRuntimeCompositeDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadTokenView' => 'applications/typeahead/view/PhabricatorTypeaheadTokenView.php',
'PhabricatorUIConfigOptions' => 'applications/config/option/PhabricatorUIConfigOptions.php',
'PhabricatorUIExample' => 'applications/uiexample/examples/PhabricatorUIExample.php',
'PhabricatorUIExampleRenderController' => 'applications/uiexample/controller/PhabricatorUIExampleRenderController.php',
'PhabricatorUIExamplesApplication' => 'applications/uiexample/application/PhabricatorUIExamplesApplication.php',
'PhabricatorUSEnglishTranslation' => 'infrastructure/internationalization/translation/PhabricatorUSEnglishTranslation.php',
'PhabricatorUnitsTestCase' => 'view/__tests__/PhabricatorUnitsTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorUnsubscribedFromObjectEdgeType' => 'applications/transactions/edges/PhabricatorUnsubscribedFromObjectEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorUser' => 'applications/people/storage/PhabricatorUser.php',
'PhabricatorUserBlurbField' => 'applications/people/customfield/PhabricatorUserBlurbField.php',
'PhabricatorUserConfigOptions' => 'applications/people/config/PhabricatorUserConfigOptions.php',
Support configuration-driven custom fields Summary: Ref T1702. Ref T3718. There are a couple of things going on here: **PhabricatorCustomFieldList**: I added `PhabricatorCustomFieldList`, which is just a convenience class for dealing with lists of fields. Often, current field code does something like this inline in a Controller: foreach ($fields as $field) { // do some junk } Often, that junk has some slightly subtle implications. Move all of it to `$list->doSomeJunk()` methods (like `appendFieldsToForm()`, `loadFieldsFromStorage()`) to reduce code duplication and prevent errors. This additionally moves an existing list-convenience method there, out of `PhabricatorPropertyListView`. **PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage**: Adds `PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage` for storing custom field data (like "ICQ Handle", "Phone Number", "Desk", "Favorite Flower", etc). **Configuration-Driven Custom Fields**: Previously, I was thinking about doing these with interfaces, but as I thought about it more I started to dislike that approach. Instead, I built proxies into `PhabricatorCustomField`. Basically, this means that fields (like a custom, configuration-driven "Favorite Flower" field) can just use some other Field to actually provide their implementation (like a "standard" field which knows how to render text areas). The previous approach would have involed subclasssing the "standard" field and implementing an interface, but that would mean that every application would have at least two "base" fields and generally just seemed bleh as I worked through it. The cost of this approach is that we need a bunch of `proxy` junk in the base class, but that's a one-time cost and I think it simplifies all the implementations and makes them a lot less magical (e.g., all of the custom fields now extend the right base field classes). **Fixed Some Bugs**: Some of this code hadn't really been run yet and had minor bugs. Test Plan: {F54240} {F54241} {F54242} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1702, T1703, T3718 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6749
2013-08-14 17:10:16 +02:00
'PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomField' => 'applications/people/customfield/PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomField.php',
'PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage' => 'applications/people/storage/PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage.php',
'PhabricatorUserCustomField' => 'applications/people/customfield/PhabricatorUserCustomField.php',
Integrate ApplicationSearch with CustomField Summary: Ref T2625. Ref T3794. Ref T418. Ref T1703. This is a more general version of D5278. It expands CustomField support to include real integration with ApplicationSearch. Broadly, custom fields may elect to: - build indicies when objects are updated; - populate ApplicationSearch forms with new controls; - read inputs entered into those controls out of the request; and - apply constraints to search queries. Some utility/helper stuff is provided to make this easier. This part could be cleaner, but seems reasonable for a first cut. In particular, the Query and SearchEngine must manually call all the hooks right now instead of everything happening magically. I think that's fine for the moment; they're pretty easy to get right. Test Plan: I added a new searchable "Company" field to People: {F58229} This also cleaned up the disable/reorder view a little bit: {F58230} As it did before, this field appears on the edit screen: {F58231} However, because it has `search`, it also appears on the search screen: {F58232} When queried, it returns the expected results: {F58233} And the actually good bit of all this is that the query can take advantage of indexes: mysql> explain SELECT * FROM `user` user JOIN `user_customfieldstringindex` `appsearch_0` ON `appsearch_0`.objectPHID = user.phid AND `appsearch_0`.indexKey = 'mk3Ndy476ge6' AND `appsearch_0`.indexValue IN ('phacility') ORDER BY user.id DESC LIMIT 101; +----+-------------+-------------+--------+-------------------+----------+---------+------------------------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | +----+-------------+-------------+--------+-------------------+----------+---------+------------------------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+ | 1 | SIMPLE | appsearch_0 | ref | key_join,key_find | key_find | 232 | const,const | 1 | Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort | | 1 | SIMPLE | user | eq_ref | phid | phid | 194 | phabricator2_user.appsearch_0.objectPHID | 1 | | +----+-------------+-------------+--------+-------------------+----------+---------+------------------------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+ 2 rows in set (0.00 sec) Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T418, T1703, T2625, T3794 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6992
2013-09-16 22:44:34 +02:00
'PhabricatorUserCustomFieldNumericIndex' => 'applications/people/storage/PhabricatorUserCustomFieldNumericIndex.php',
'PhabricatorUserCustomFieldStringIndex' => 'applications/people/storage/PhabricatorUserCustomFieldStringIndex.php',
'PhabricatorUserDAO' => 'applications/people/storage/PhabricatorUserDAO.php',
'PhabricatorUserEditor' => 'applications/people/editor/PhabricatorUserEditor.php',
'PhabricatorUserEditorTestCase' => 'applications/people/editor/__tests__/PhabricatorUserEditorTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorUserEmail' => 'applications/people/storage/PhabricatorUserEmail.php',
'PhabricatorUserEmailTestCase' => 'applications/people/storage/__tests__/PhabricatorUserEmailTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorUserLog' => 'applications/people/storage/PhabricatorUserLog.php',
'PhabricatorUserLogView' => 'applications/people/view/PhabricatorUserLogView.php',
'PhabricatorUserPHIDResolver' => 'applications/phid/resolver/PhabricatorUserPHIDResolver.php',
'PhabricatorUserPreferences' => 'applications/settings/storage/PhabricatorUserPreferences.php',
'PhabricatorUserProfile' => 'applications/people/storage/PhabricatorUserProfile.php',
'PhabricatorUserProfileEditor' => 'applications/people/editor/PhabricatorUserProfileEditor.php',
'PhabricatorUserRealNameField' => 'applications/people/customfield/PhabricatorUserRealNameField.php',
'PhabricatorUserRolesField' => 'applications/people/customfield/PhabricatorUserRolesField.php',
'PhabricatorUserSchemaSpec' => 'applications/people/storage/PhabricatorUserSchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorUserSearchIndexer' => 'applications/people/search/PhabricatorUserSearchIndexer.php',
'PhabricatorUserSinceField' => 'applications/people/customfield/PhabricatorUserSinceField.php',
'PhabricatorUserStatusField' => 'applications/people/customfield/PhabricatorUserStatusField.php',
'PhabricatorUserTestCase' => 'applications/people/storage/__tests__/PhabricatorUserTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorUserTitleField' => 'applications/people/customfield/PhabricatorUserTitleField.php',
'PhabricatorUserTransaction' => 'applications/people/storage/PhabricatorUserTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorUsersEditField' => 'applications/transactions/editfield/PhabricatorUsersEditField.php',
'PhabricatorUsersPolicyRule' => 'applications/people/policyrule/PhabricatorUsersPolicyRule.php',
'PhabricatorUsersSearchField' => 'applications/people/searchfield/PhabricatorUsersSearchField.php',
'PhabricatorVCSResponse' => 'applications/repository/response/PhabricatorVCSResponse.php',
'PhabricatorVersionedDraft' => 'applications/draft/storage/PhabricatorVersionedDraft.php',
'PhabricatorVeryWowEnglishTranslation' => 'infrastructure/internationalization/translation/PhabricatorVeryWowEnglishTranslation.php',
'PhabricatorViewerDatasource' => 'applications/people/typeahead/PhabricatorViewerDatasource.php',
'PhabricatorWatcherHasObjectEdgeType' => 'applications/transactions/edges/PhabricatorWatcherHasObjectEdgeType.php',
'PhabricatorWordPressAuthProvider' => 'applications/auth/provider/PhabricatorWordPressAuthProvider.php',
'PhabricatorWorker' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/PhabricatorWorker.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerActiveTask' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/storage/PhabricatorWorkerActiveTask.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerArchiveTask' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/storage/PhabricatorWorkerArchiveTask.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerArchiveTaskQuery' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/query/PhabricatorWorkerArchiveTaskQuery.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJob' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/storage/PhabricatorWorkerBulkJob.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobCreateWorker' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/bulk/PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobCreateWorker.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobEditor' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/editor/PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobEditor.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobPHIDType' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/phid/PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobQuery' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/query/PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobQuery.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobSearchEngine' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/query/PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobSearchEngine.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobTaskWorker' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/bulk/PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobTaskWorker.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobTestCase' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/__tests__/PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobTransaction' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/storage/PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobTransaction.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobTransactionQuery' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/query/PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobTransactionQuery.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobType' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/bulk/PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobType.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobWorker' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/bulk/PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobWorker.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkTask' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/storage/PhabricatorWorkerBulkTask.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerDAO' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/storage/PhabricatorWorkerDAO.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerLeaseQuery' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/query/PhabricatorWorkerLeaseQuery.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerManagementCancelWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/management/PhabricatorWorkerManagementCancelWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerManagementExecuteWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/management/PhabricatorWorkerManagementExecuteWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerManagementFloodWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/management/PhabricatorWorkerManagementFloodWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerManagementFreeWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/management/PhabricatorWorkerManagementFreeWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerManagementRetryWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/management/PhabricatorWorkerManagementRetryWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerManagementWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/management/PhabricatorWorkerManagementWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerPermanentFailureException' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/exception/PhabricatorWorkerPermanentFailureException.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerSchemaSpec' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/storage/PhabricatorWorkerSchemaSpec.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerTask' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/storage/PhabricatorWorkerTask.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerTaskData' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/storage/PhabricatorWorkerTaskData.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerTaskDetailController' => 'applications/daemon/controller/PhabricatorWorkerTaskDetailController.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerTestCase' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/__tests__/PhabricatorWorkerTestCase.php',
Implement clock/trigger infrastructure for scheduling actions Summary: Ref T6881. Hopefully, this is the hard part. This adds a new daemon (the "trigger" daemon) which processes triggers, schedules them, and then executes them at the scheduled time. The design is a little complicated, but has these goals: - High resistance to race conditions: only the application writes to the trigger table; only the daemon writes to the event table. We won't lose events if someone saves a meeting at the same time as we're sending a reminder out for it. - Execution guarantees: scheduled events are guaranteed to execute exactly once. - Support for arbitrarily large queues: the daemon will make progress even if there are millions of triggers in queue. The cost to update the queue is proportional to the number of changes in it; the cost to process the queue is proportional to the number of events to execute. - Relatively good observability: you can monitor the state of the trigger queue reasonably well from the web UI. - Modular Infrastructure: this is a very low-level construct that Calendar, Phortune, etc., should be able to build on top of. It doesn't have this stuff yet: - Not very robust to bad actions: a misbehaving trigger can stop the queue fairly easily. This is OK for now since we aren't planning to make it part of any other applications for a while. We do still get execute-exaclty-once, but it might not happen for a long time (until someone goes and fixes the queue), when we could theoretically continue executing other events. - Doesn't start automatically: normal users don't need to run this thing yet so I'm not starting it by default. - Not super well tested: I've vetted the basics but haven't run real workloads through this yet. - No sophisticated tooling: I added some basic stuff but it's missing some pieces we'll have to build sooner or later, e.g. `bin/trigger cancel` or whatever. - Intentionally not realtime: This design puts execution guarantees far above realtime concerns, and will not give you precise event execution at 1-second resolution. I think this is the correct goal to pursue architecturally, and certainly correct for subscriptions and meeting reminders. Events which execute after they have become irrelevant can simply decline to do anything (like a meeting reminder which executes after the meeting is over). In general, the expectation for applications is: - When creating an object (like a calendar event) that needs to trigger a scheduled action, write a trigger (and save the PHID if you plan to update it later). - The daemon will process the event and schedule the action efficiently, in a race-free way. - If you want to move the action, update the trigger and the daemon will take care of it. - Your action will eventually dump a task into the task queue, and the task daemons will actually perform it. Test Plan: Using a test script like this: ``` <?php require_once 'scripts/__init_script__.php'; $trigger = id(new PhabricatorWorkerTrigger()) ->setAction( new PhabricatorLogTriggerAction( array( 'message' => 'test', ))) ->setClock( new PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock( array( 'period' => 33, ))) ->save(); var_dump($trigger); ``` ...I queued triggers and ran the daemon: - Verified triggers fire; - verified triggers reschedule; - verified trigger events show up in the web UI; - tried different periods; - added some triggers while the daemon was running; - examined `phd debug` output for anything suspicious. It seems to work in trivial use case, at least. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T6881 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11419
2015-01-16 21:13:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorWorkerTrigger' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/storage/PhabricatorWorkerTrigger.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerTriggerEvent' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/storage/PhabricatorWorkerTriggerEvent.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerTriggerManagementFireWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/management/PhabricatorWorkerTriggerManagementFireWorkflow.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerTriggerManagementWorkflow' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/management/PhabricatorWorkerTriggerManagementWorkflow.php',
Implement clock/trigger infrastructure for scheduling actions Summary: Ref T6881. Hopefully, this is the hard part. This adds a new daemon (the "trigger" daemon) which processes triggers, schedules them, and then executes them at the scheduled time. The design is a little complicated, but has these goals: - High resistance to race conditions: only the application writes to the trigger table; only the daemon writes to the event table. We won't lose events if someone saves a meeting at the same time as we're sending a reminder out for it. - Execution guarantees: scheduled events are guaranteed to execute exactly once. - Support for arbitrarily large queues: the daemon will make progress even if there are millions of triggers in queue. The cost to update the queue is proportional to the number of changes in it; the cost to process the queue is proportional to the number of events to execute. - Relatively good observability: you can monitor the state of the trigger queue reasonably well from the web UI. - Modular Infrastructure: this is a very low-level construct that Calendar, Phortune, etc., should be able to build on top of. It doesn't have this stuff yet: - Not very robust to bad actions: a misbehaving trigger can stop the queue fairly easily. This is OK for now since we aren't planning to make it part of any other applications for a while. We do still get execute-exaclty-once, but it might not happen for a long time (until someone goes and fixes the queue), when we could theoretically continue executing other events. - Doesn't start automatically: normal users don't need to run this thing yet so I'm not starting it by default. - Not super well tested: I've vetted the basics but haven't run real workloads through this yet. - No sophisticated tooling: I added some basic stuff but it's missing some pieces we'll have to build sooner or later, e.g. `bin/trigger cancel` or whatever. - Intentionally not realtime: This design puts execution guarantees far above realtime concerns, and will not give you precise event execution at 1-second resolution. I think this is the correct goal to pursue architecturally, and certainly correct for subscriptions and meeting reminders. Events which execute after they have become irrelevant can simply decline to do anything (like a meeting reminder which executes after the meeting is over). In general, the expectation for applications is: - When creating an object (like a calendar event) that needs to trigger a scheduled action, write a trigger (and save the PHID if you plan to update it later). - The daemon will process the event and schedule the action efficiently, in a race-free way. - If you want to move the action, update the trigger and the daemon will take care of it. - Your action will eventually dump a task into the task queue, and the task daemons will actually perform it. Test Plan: Using a test script like this: ``` <?php require_once 'scripts/__init_script__.php'; $trigger = id(new PhabricatorWorkerTrigger()) ->setAction( new PhabricatorLogTriggerAction( array( 'message' => 'test', ))) ->setClock( new PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock( array( 'period' => 33, ))) ->save(); var_dump($trigger); ``` ...I queued triggers and ran the daemon: - Verified triggers fire; - verified triggers reschedule; - verified trigger events show up in the web UI; - tried different periods; - added some triggers while the daemon was running; - examined `phd debug` output for anything suspicious. It seems to work in trivial use case, at least. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T6881 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11419
2015-01-16 21:13:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorWorkerTriggerPHIDType' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/phid/PhabricatorWorkerTriggerPHIDType.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerTriggerQuery' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/query/PhabricatorWorkerTriggerQuery.php',
'PhabricatorWorkerYieldException' => 'infrastructure/daemon/workers/exception/PhabricatorWorkerYieldException.php',
'PhabricatorWorkingCopyDiscoveryTestCase' => 'applications/repository/engine/__tests__/PhabricatorWorkingCopyDiscoveryTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorWorkingCopyPullTestCase' => 'applications/repository/engine/__tests__/PhabricatorWorkingCopyPullTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorWorkingCopyTestCase' => 'applications/repository/engine/__tests__/PhabricatorWorkingCopyTestCase.php',
'PhabricatorXHPASTDAO' => 'applications/phpast/storage/PhabricatorXHPASTDAO.php',
'PhabricatorXHPASTParseTree' => 'applications/phpast/storage/PhabricatorXHPASTParseTree.php',
'PhabricatorXHPASTViewController' => 'applications/phpast/controller/PhabricatorXHPASTViewController.php',
'PhabricatorXHPASTViewFrameController' => 'applications/phpast/controller/PhabricatorXHPASTViewFrameController.php',
'PhabricatorXHPASTViewFramesetController' => 'applications/phpast/controller/PhabricatorXHPASTViewFramesetController.php',
'PhabricatorXHPASTViewInputController' => 'applications/phpast/controller/PhabricatorXHPASTViewInputController.php',
'PhabricatorXHPASTViewPanelController' => 'applications/phpast/controller/PhabricatorXHPASTViewPanelController.php',
'PhabricatorXHPASTViewRunController' => 'applications/phpast/controller/PhabricatorXHPASTViewRunController.php',
'PhabricatorXHPASTViewStreamController' => 'applications/phpast/controller/PhabricatorXHPASTViewStreamController.php',
'PhabricatorXHPASTViewTreeController' => 'applications/phpast/controller/PhabricatorXHPASTViewTreeController.php',
'PhabricatorXHProfApplication' => 'applications/xhprof/application/PhabricatorXHProfApplication.php',
'PhabricatorXHProfController' => 'applications/xhprof/controller/PhabricatorXHProfController.php',
'PhabricatorXHProfDAO' => 'applications/xhprof/storage/PhabricatorXHProfDAO.php',
'PhabricatorXHProfProfileController' => 'applications/xhprof/controller/PhabricatorXHProfProfileController.php',
'PhabricatorXHProfProfileSymbolView' => 'applications/xhprof/view/PhabricatorXHProfProfileSymbolView.php',
'PhabricatorXHProfProfileTopLevelView' => 'applications/xhprof/view/PhabricatorXHProfProfileTopLevelView.php',
'PhabricatorXHProfProfileView' => 'applications/xhprof/view/PhabricatorXHProfProfileView.php',
'PhabricatorXHProfSample' => 'applications/xhprof/storage/PhabricatorXHProfSample.php',
'PhabricatorXHProfSampleListController' => 'applications/xhprof/controller/PhabricatorXHProfSampleListController.php',
'PhabricatorYoutubeRemarkupRule' => 'infrastructure/markup/rule/PhabricatorYoutubeRemarkupRule.php',
'PhameBlog' => 'applications/phame/storage/PhameBlog.php',
'PhameBlogArchiveController' => 'applications/phame/controller/blog/PhameBlogArchiveController.php',
'PhameBlogController' => 'applications/phame/controller/blog/PhameBlogController.php',
'PhameBlogCreateCapability' => 'applications/phame/capability/PhameBlogCreateCapability.php',
'PhameBlogEditController' => 'applications/phame/controller/blog/PhameBlogEditController.php',
'PhameBlogEditor' => 'applications/phame/editor/PhameBlogEditor.php',
'PhameBlogFeedController' => 'applications/phame/controller/blog/PhameBlogFeedController.php',
'PhameBlogListController' => 'applications/phame/controller/blog/PhameBlogListController.php',
'PhameBlogListView' => 'applications/phame/view/PhameBlogListView.php',
'PhameBlogManageController' => 'applications/phame/controller/blog/PhameBlogManageController.php',
'PhameBlogProfilePictureController' => 'applications/phame/controller/blog/PhameBlogProfilePictureController.php',
'PhameBlogQuery' => 'applications/phame/query/PhameBlogQuery.php',
'PhameBlogReplyHandler' => 'applications/phame/mail/PhameBlogReplyHandler.php',
'PhameBlogSearchEngine' => 'applications/phame/query/PhameBlogSearchEngine.php',
'PhameBlogSite' => 'applications/phame/site/PhameBlogSite.php',
'PhameBlogTransaction' => 'applications/phame/storage/PhameBlogTransaction.php',
'PhameBlogTransactionQuery' => 'applications/phame/query/PhameBlogTransactionQuery.php',
'PhameBlogViewController' => 'applications/phame/controller/blog/PhameBlogViewController.php',
'PhameConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phame/conduit/PhameConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PhameConstants' => 'applications/phame/constants/PhameConstants.php',
'PhameController' => 'applications/phame/controller/PhameController.php',
'PhameCreatePostConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phame/conduit/PhameCreatePostConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PhameDAO' => 'applications/phame/storage/PhameDAO.php',
'PhameDescriptionView' => 'applications/phame/view/PhameDescriptionView.php',
'PhameDraftListView' => 'applications/phame/view/PhameDraftListView.php',
'PhameHomeController' => 'applications/phame/controller/PhameHomeController.php',
Remove skins from Phame Summary: Ref T9897. Purge a bunch of stuff: - Remove skins. - Remove all custom sites for skin resources. - Remove "framed", "notlive", "preview", separate "live" controllers (see below). - Merge "publish" and "unpublish" controllers into one. New behavior: - Blogs and posts have three views: - "View": Internal view URI, which is a normal detail page. - "Internal Live": Internal view URI which is a little prettier. - "External Live": External view URI for an external domain. Right now, the differences are pretty minor (basically, different crumbs/chrome). This mostly gives us room to put some milder flavor of skins back later (photography or more "presentation" elements, for example). This removes 9 million lines of code so I probably missed a couple of things, but I think it's like 95% of the way there. Test Plan: Here are some examples of what the "view", "internal" and "external" views look like for blogs (posts are similar): "View": Unchanged {F1021634} "Internal": No chrome or footer. Still write actions (edit, post commments). Has crumbs to get back into Phame. {F1021635} "External": No chrome or footer. No write actions. No Phabricator crumbs. No policy/status information. {F1021638} I figure we'll probably tweak these a bit to figure out what makes sense (like: maybe no actions on "internal, live"? and "external, live" probably needs a way to set a root "Company >" crumb?) but that they're reasonable-ish as a first cut? Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9897 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14740
2015-12-11 16:07:45 +01:00
'PhameLiveController' => 'applications/phame/controller/PhameLiveController.php',
'PhamePost' => 'applications/phame/storage/PhamePost.php',
'PhamePostCommentController' => 'applications/phame/controller/post/PhamePostCommentController.php',
'PhamePostController' => 'applications/phame/controller/post/PhamePostController.php',
'PhamePostEditController' => 'applications/phame/controller/post/PhamePostEditController.php',
'PhamePostEditor' => 'applications/phame/editor/PhamePostEditor.php',
'PhamePostHistoryController' => 'applications/phame/controller/post/PhamePostHistoryController.php',
'PhamePostListController' => 'applications/phame/controller/post/PhamePostListController.php',
'PhamePostListView' => 'applications/phame/view/PhamePostListView.php',
'PhamePostMailReceiver' => 'applications/phame/mail/PhamePostMailReceiver.php',
'PhamePostMoveController' => 'applications/phame/controller/post/PhamePostMoveController.php',
'PhamePostPublishController' => 'applications/phame/controller/post/PhamePostPublishController.php',
'PhamePostQuery' => 'applications/phame/query/PhamePostQuery.php',
'PhamePostReplyHandler' => 'applications/phame/mail/PhamePostReplyHandler.php',
'PhamePostSearchEngine' => 'applications/phame/query/PhamePostSearchEngine.php',
'PhamePostTransaction' => 'applications/phame/storage/PhamePostTransaction.php',
'PhamePostTransactionComment' => 'applications/phame/storage/PhamePostTransactionComment.php',
'PhamePostTransactionQuery' => 'applications/phame/query/PhamePostTransactionQuery.php',
'PhamePostViewController' => 'applications/phame/controller/post/PhamePostViewController.php',
'PhameQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phame/conduit/PhameQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PhameQueryPostsConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phame/conduit/PhameQueryPostsConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PhameSchemaSpec' => 'applications/phame/storage/PhameSchemaSpec.php',
'PhameSite' => 'applications/phame/site/PhameSite.php',
'PhluxController' => 'applications/phlux/controller/PhluxController.php',
'PhluxDAO' => 'applications/phlux/storage/PhluxDAO.php',
'PhluxEditController' => 'applications/phlux/controller/PhluxEditController.php',
'PhluxListController' => 'applications/phlux/controller/PhluxListController.php',
'PhluxTransaction' => 'applications/phlux/storage/PhluxTransaction.php',
'PhluxTransactionQuery' => 'applications/phlux/query/PhluxTransactionQuery.php',
'PhluxVariable' => 'applications/phlux/storage/PhluxVariable.php',
'PhluxVariableEditor' => 'applications/phlux/editor/PhluxVariableEditor.php',
'PhluxVariablePHIDType' => 'applications/phlux/phid/PhluxVariablePHIDType.php',
'PhluxVariableQuery' => 'applications/phlux/query/PhluxVariableQuery.php',
'PhluxViewController' => 'applications/phlux/controller/PhluxViewController.php',
'PholioActionMenuEventListener' => 'applications/pholio/event/PholioActionMenuEventListener.php',
'PholioController' => 'applications/pholio/controller/PholioController.php',
'PholioDAO' => 'applications/pholio/storage/PholioDAO.php',
'PholioDefaultEditCapability' => 'applications/pholio/capability/PholioDefaultEditCapability.php',
'PholioDefaultViewCapability' => 'applications/pholio/capability/PholioDefaultViewCapability.php',
'PholioImage' => 'applications/pholio/storage/PholioImage.php',
'PholioImagePHIDType' => 'applications/pholio/phid/PholioImagePHIDType.php',
'PholioImageQuery' => 'applications/pholio/query/PholioImageQuery.php',
'PholioImageUploadController' => 'applications/pholio/controller/PholioImageUploadController.php',
'PholioInlineController' => 'applications/pholio/controller/PholioInlineController.php',
'PholioInlineListController' => 'applications/pholio/controller/PholioInlineListController.php',
'PholioMock' => 'applications/pholio/storage/PholioMock.php',
'PholioMockArchiveController' => 'applications/pholio/controller/PholioMockArchiveController.php',
'PholioMockAuthorHeraldField' => 'applications/pholio/herald/PholioMockAuthorHeraldField.php',
'PholioMockCommentController' => 'applications/pholio/controller/PholioMockCommentController.php',
'PholioMockDescriptionHeraldField' => 'applications/pholio/herald/PholioMockDescriptionHeraldField.php',
'PholioMockEditController' => 'applications/pholio/controller/PholioMockEditController.php',
'PholioMockEditor' => 'applications/pholio/editor/PholioMockEditor.php',
'PholioMockEmbedView' => 'applications/pholio/view/PholioMockEmbedView.php',
'PholioMockHasTaskEdgeType' => 'applications/pholio/edge/PholioMockHasTaskEdgeType.php',
'PholioMockHeraldField' => 'applications/pholio/herald/PholioMockHeraldField.php',
'PholioMockHeraldFieldGroup' => 'applications/pholio/herald/PholioMockHeraldFieldGroup.php',
'PholioMockImagesView' => 'applications/pholio/view/PholioMockImagesView.php',
'PholioMockListController' => 'applications/pholio/controller/PholioMockListController.php',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'PholioMockMailReceiver' => 'applications/pholio/mail/PholioMockMailReceiver.php',
'PholioMockNameHeraldField' => 'applications/pholio/herald/PholioMockNameHeraldField.php',
'PholioMockPHIDType' => 'applications/pholio/phid/PholioMockPHIDType.php',
'PholioMockQuery' => 'applications/pholio/query/PholioMockQuery.php',
'PholioMockSearchEngine' => 'applications/pholio/query/PholioMockSearchEngine.php',
'PholioMockThumbGridView' => 'applications/pholio/view/PholioMockThumbGridView.php',
'PholioMockViewController' => 'applications/pholio/controller/PholioMockViewController.php',
'PholioRemarkupRule' => 'applications/pholio/remarkup/PholioRemarkupRule.php',
'PholioReplyHandler' => 'applications/pholio/mail/PholioReplyHandler.php',
'PholioSchemaSpec' => 'applications/pholio/storage/PholioSchemaSpec.php',
'PholioSearchIndexer' => 'applications/pholio/search/PholioSearchIndexer.php',
'PholioTransaction' => 'applications/pholio/storage/PholioTransaction.php',
'PholioTransactionComment' => 'applications/pholio/storage/PholioTransactionComment.php',
'PholioTransactionQuery' => 'applications/pholio/query/PholioTransactionQuery.php',
'PholioTransactionView' => 'applications/pholio/view/PholioTransactionView.php',
'PholioUploadedImageView' => 'applications/pholio/view/PholioUploadedImageView.php',
2013-03-28 17:10:34 +01:00
'PhortuneAccount' => 'applications/phortune/storage/PhortuneAccount.php',
'PhortuneAccountEditController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneAccountEditController.php',
2013-03-28 17:10:34 +01:00
'PhortuneAccountEditor' => 'applications/phortune/editor/PhortuneAccountEditor.php',
'PhortuneAccountHasMemberEdgeType' => 'applications/phortune/edge/PhortuneAccountHasMemberEdgeType.php',
'PhortuneAccountListController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneAccountListController.php',
'PhortuneAccountPHIDType' => 'applications/phortune/phid/PhortuneAccountPHIDType.php',
2013-03-28 17:10:34 +01:00
'PhortuneAccountQuery' => 'applications/phortune/query/PhortuneAccountQuery.php',
'PhortuneAccountTransaction' => 'applications/phortune/storage/PhortuneAccountTransaction.php',
'PhortuneAccountTransactionQuery' => 'applications/phortune/query/PhortuneAccountTransactionQuery.php',
'PhortuneAccountViewController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneAccountViewController.php',
'PhortuneAdHocCart' => 'applications/phortune/cart/PhortuneAdHocCart.php',
'PhortuneAdHocProduct' => 'applications/phortune/product/PhortuneAdHocProduct.php',
'PhortuneCart' => 'applications/phortune/storage/PhortuneCart.php',
'PhortuneCartAcceptController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneCartAcceptController.php',
'PhortuneCartCancelController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneCartCancelController.php',
'PhortuneCartCheckoutController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneCartCheckoutController.php',
'PhortuneCartController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneCartController.php',
'PhortuneCartEditor' => 'applications/phortune/editor/PhortuneCartEditor.php',
'PhortuneCartImplementation' => 'applications/phortune/cart/PhortuneCartImplementation.php',
'PhortuneCartListController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneCartListController.php',
'PhortuneCartPHIDType' => 'applications/phortune/phid/PhortuneCartPHIDType.php',
'PhortuneCartQuery' => 'applications/phortune/query/PhortuneCartQuery.php',
'PhortuneCartReplyHandler' => 'applications/phortune/mail/PhortuneCartReplyHandler.php',
'PhortuneCartSearchEngine' => 'applications/phortune/query/PhortuneCartSearchEngine.php',
'PhortuneCartTransaction' => 'applications/phortune/storage/PhortuneCartTransaction.php',
'PhortuneCartTransactionQuery' => 'applications/phortune/query/PhortuneCartTransactionQuery.php',
'PhortuneCartUpdateController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneCartUpdateController.php',
'PhortuneCartViewController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneCartViewController.php',
2013-03-28 17:10:34 +01:00
'PhortuneCharge' => 'applications/phortune/storage/PhortuneCharge.php',
'PhortuneChargeListController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneChargeListController.php',
'PhortuneChargePHIDType' => 'applications/phortune/phid/PhortuneChargePHIDType.php',
'PhortuneChargeQuery' => 'applications/phortune/query/PhortuneChargeQuery.php',
'PhortuneChargeSearchEngine' => 'applications/phortune/query/PhortuneChargeSearchEngine.php',
'PhortuneChargeTableView' => 'applications/phortune/view/PhortuneChargeTableView.php',
'PhortuneConstants' => 'applications/phortune/constants/PhortuneConstants.php',
2013-03-28 17:10:34 +01:00
'PhortuneController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneController.php',
'PhortuneCreditCardForm' => 'applications/phortune/view/PhortuneCreditCardForm.php',
'PhortuneCurrency' => 'applications/phortune/currency/PhortuneCurrency.php',
'PhortuneCurrencySerializer' => 'applications/phortune/currency/PhortuneCurrencySerializer.php',
'PhortuneCurrencyTestCase' => 'applications/phortune/currency/__tests__/PhortuneCurrencyTestCase.php',
2013-03-28 17:10:34 +01:00
'PhortuneDAO' => 'applications/phortune/storage/PhortuneDAO.php',
'PhortuneErrCode' => 'applications/phortune/constants/PhortuneErrCode.php',
2013-03-28 17:10:34 +01:00
'PhortuneLandingController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneLandingController.php',
'PhortuneMemberHasAccountEdgeType' => 'applications/phortune/edge/PhortuneMemberHasAccountEdgeType.php',
'PhortuneMemberHasMerchantEdgeType' => 'applications/phortune/edge/PhortuneMemberHasMerchantEdgeType.php',
Add Merchants to Phortune Summary: Ref T2787. Currently, you add payment providers (Stripe, Paypal, etc) in global configuration. Generally, this approach is cumbersome, limiting, and often hard for users to figure out. It also doesn't provide a natural way to segment payment receivers or provide web access to administrative payment functions like issuing refunds, canceling orders, etc. I think that stuff definitely needs to be in the web UI, and the rule for access to it can't reasonably just be "all administrators" in a lot of reasonable cases. The only real advantage is that it prevents an attacker from adjusting settings and pointing something at an account they control. But this attack can be mitigated through notifications, some sort of CLI-only merchant lock, payment accounts being relatively identifiable, etc. So introduce "merchants", which are basically payable entities. An individual merchant will have attached Paypal, Stripe, etc., accounts, and access rules. When you buy something in an application, the merchant to pay is also specified. They also provide an umbrella for dealing with permissions down the line. This may get a //little// cumbersome because if there are several merchants your saved card information is not shared across them. I think that will be fine in the normal case (most installs will have only one merchant). Even if it isn't and we leave providers global, I think introducing this is the right call from a web UI / permissions point of view. I'll play around with it in the next couple of diffs and figure out exactly where the line goes. Test Plan: Listed, created, edited, viewed merchants. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T2787 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10648
2014-10-07 19:55:16 +02:00
'PhortuneMerchant' => 'applications/phortune/storage/PhortuneMerchant.php',
'PhortuneMerchantCapability' => 'applications/phortune/capability/PhortuneMerchantCapability.php',
'PhortuneMerchantController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneMerchantController.php',
'PhortuneMerchantEditController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneMerchantEditController.php',
'PhortuneMerchantEditor' => 'applications/phortune/editor/PhortuneMerchantEditor.php',
'PhortuneMerchantHasMemberEdgeType' => 'applications/phortune/edge/PhortuneMerchantHasMemberEdgeType.php',
'PhortuneMerchantInvoiceCreateController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneMerchantInvoiceCreateController.php',
Add Merchants to Phortune Summary: Ref T2787. Currently, you add payment providers (Stripe, Paypal, etc) in global configuration. Generally, this approach is cumbersome, limiting, and often hard for users to figure out. It also doesn't provide a natural way to segment payment receivers or provide web access to administrative payment functions like issuing refunds, canceling orders, etc. I think that stuff definitely needs to be in the web UI, and the rule for access to it can't reasonably just be "all administrators" in a lot of reasonable cases. The only real advantage is that it prevents an attacker from adjusting settings and pointing something at an account they control. But this attack can be mitigated through notifications, some sort of CLI-only merchant lock, payment accounts being relatively identifiable, etc. So introduce "merchants", which are basically payable entities. An individual merchant will have attached Paypal, Stripe, etc., accounts, and access rules. When you buy something in an application, the merchant to pay is also specified. They also provide an umbrella for dealing with permissions down the line. This may get a //little// cumbersome because if there are several merchants your saved card information is not shared across them. I think that will be fine in the normal case (most installs will have only one merchant). Even if it isn't and we leave providers global, I think introducing this is the right call from a web UI / permissions point of view. I'll play around with it in the next couple of diffs and figure out exactly where the line goes. Test Plan: Listed, created, edited, viewed merchants. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T2787 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10648
2014-10-07 19:55:16 +02:00
'PhortuneMerchantListController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneMerchantListController.php',
'PhortuneMerchantPHIDType' => 'applications/phortune/phid/PhortuneMerchantPHIDType.php',
'PhortuneMerchantQuery' => 'applications/phortune/query/PhortuneMerchantQuery.php',
'PhortuneMerchantSearchEngine' => 'applications/phortune/query/PhortuneMerchantSearchEngine.php',
'PhortuneMerchantTransaction' => 'applications/phortune/storage/PhortuneMerchantTransaction.php',
'PhortuneMerchantTransactionQuery' => 'applications/phortune/query/PhortuneMerchantTransactionQuery.php',
'PhortuneMerchantViewController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneMerchantViewController.php',
'PhortuneMonthYearExpiryControl' => 'applications/phortune/control/PhortuneMonthYearExpiryControl.php',
'PhortuneOrderTableView' => 'applications/phortune/view/PhortuneOrderTableView.php',
'PhortunePayPalPaymentProvider' => 'applications/phortune/provider/PhortunePayPalPaymentProvider.php',
2013-03-28 17:10:34 +01:00
'PhortunePaymentMethod' => 'applications/phortune/storage/PhortunePaymentMethod.php',
'PhortunePaymentMethodCreateController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortunePaymentMethodCreateController.php',
'PhortunePaymentMethodDisableController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortunePaymentMethodDisableController.php',
'PhortunePaymentMethodEditController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortunePaymentMethodEditController.php',
'PhortunePaymentMethodPHIDType' => 'applications/phortune/phid/PhortunePaymentMethodPHIDType.php',
'PhortunePaymentMethodQuery' => 'applications/phortune/query/PhortunePaymentMethodQuery.php',
'PhortunePaymentProvider' => 'applications/phortune/provider/PhortunePaymentProvider.php',
'PhortunePaymentProviderConfig' => 'applications/phortune/storage/PhortunePaymentProviderConfig.php',
'PhortunePaymentProviderConfigEditor' => 'applications/phortune/editor/PhortunePaymentProviderConfigEditor.php',
'PhortunePaymentProviderConfigQuery' => 'applications/phortune/query/PhortunePaymentProviderConfigQuery.php',
'PhortunePaymentProviderConfigTransaction' => 'applications/phortune/storage/PhortunePaymentProviderConfigTransaction.php',
'PhortunePaymentProviderConfigTransactionQuery' => 'applications/phortune/query/PhortunePaymentProviderConfigTransactionQuery.php',
'PhortunePaymentProviderPHIDType' => 'applications/phortune/phid/PhortunePaymentProviderPHIDType.php',
'PhortunePaymentProviderTestCase' => 'applications/phortune/provider/__tests__/PhortunePaymentProviderTestCase.php',
2013-03-28 17:10:34 +01:00
'PhortuneProduct' => 'applications/phortune/storage/PhortuneProduct.php',
'PhortuneProductImplementation' => 'applications/phortune/product/PhortuneProductImplementation.php',
'PhortuneProductListController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneProductListController.php',
'PhortuneProductPHIDType' => 'applications/phortune/phid/PhortuneProductPHIDType.php',
'PhortuneProductQuery' => 'applications/phortune/query/PhortuneProductQuery.php',
'PhortuneProductViewController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneProductViewController.php',
'PhortuneProviderActionController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneProviderActionController.php',
'PhortuneProviderDisableController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneProviderDisableController.php',
'PhortuneProviderEditController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneProviderEditController.php',
2013-03-28 17:10:34 +01:00
'PhortunePurchase' => 'applications/phortune/storage/PhortunePurchase.php',
'PhortunePurchasePHIDType' => 'applications/phortune/phid/PhortunePurchasePHIDType.php',
'PhortunePurchaseQuery' => 'applications/phortune/query/PhortunePurchaseQuery.php',
'PhortuneSchemaSpec' => 'applications/phortune/storage/PhortuneSchemaSpec.php',
'PhortuneStripePaymentProvider' => 'applications/phortune/provider/PhortuneStripePaymentProvider.php',
'PhortuneSubscription' => 'applications/phortune/storage/PhortuneSubscription.php',
'PhortuneSubscriptionCart' => 'applications/phortune/cart/PhortuneSubscriptionCart.php',
'PhortuneSubscriptionEditController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneSubscriptionEditController.php',
'PhortuneSubscriptionImplementation' => 'applications/phortune/subscription/PhortuneSubscriptionImplementation.php',
'PhortuneSubscriptionListController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneSubscriptionListController.php',
'PhortuneSubscriptionPHIDType' => 'applications/phortune/phid/PhortuneSubscriptionPHIDType.php',
'PhortuneSubscriptionProduct' => 'applications/phortune/product/PhortuneSubscriptionProduct.php',
'PhortuneSubscriptionQuery' => 'applications/phortune/query/PhortuneSubscriptionQuery.php',
'PhortuneSubscriptionSearchEngine' => 'applications/phortune/query/PhortuneSubscriptionSearchEngine.php',
'PhortuneSubscriptionTableView' => 'applications/phortune/view/PhortuneSubscriptionTableView.php',
'PhortuneSubscriptionViewController' => 'applications/phortune/controller/PhortuneSubscriptionViewController.php',
'PhortuneSubscriptionWorker' => 'applications/phortune/worker/PhortuneSubscriptionWorker.php',
'PhortuneTestPaymentProvider' => 'applications/phortune/provider/PhortuneTestPaymentProvider.php',
'PhortuneWePayPaymentProvider' => 'applications/phortune/provider/PhortuneWePayPaymentProvider.php',
'PhragmentBrowseController' => 'applications/phragment/controller/PhragmentBrowseController.php',
'PhragmentCanCreateCapability' => 'applications/phragment/capability/PhragmentCanCreateCapability.php',
'PhragmentConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phragment/conduit/PhragmentConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PhragmentController' => 'applications/phragment/controller/PhragmentController.php',
'PhragmentCreateController' => 'applications/phragment/controller/PhragmentCreateController.php',
'PhragmentDAO' => 'applications/phragment/storage/PhragmentDAO.php',
'PhragmentFragment' => 'applications/phragment/storage/PhragmentFragment.php',
'PhragmentFragmentPHIDType' => 'applications/phragment/phid/PhragmentFragmentPHIDType.php',
'PhragmentFragmentQuery' => 'applications/phragment/query/PhragmentFragmentQuery.php',
'PhragmentFragmentVersion' => 'applications/phragment/storage/PhragmentFragmentVersion.php',
'PhragmentFragmentVersionPHIDType' => 'applications/phragment/phid/PhragmentFragmentVersionPHIDType.php',
'PhragmentFragmentVersionQuery' => 'applications/phragment/query/PhragmentFragmentVersionQuery.php',
'PhragmentGetPatchConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phragment/conduit/PhragmentGetPatchConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PhragmentHistoryController' => 'applications/phragment/controller/PhragmentHistoryController.php',
'PhragmentPatchController' => 'applications/phragment/controller/PhragmentPatchController.php',
'PhragmentPatchUtil' => 'applications/phragment/util/PhragmentPatchUtil.php',
'PhragmentPolicyController' => 'applications/phragment/controller/PhragmentPolicyController.php',
'PhragmentQueryFragmentsConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phragment/conduit/PhragmentQueryFragmentsConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PhragmentRevertController' => 'applications/phragment/controller/PhragmentRevertController.php',
'PhragmentSchemaSpec' => 'applications/phragment/storage/PhragmentSchemaSpec.php',
'PhragmentSnapshot' => 'applications/phragment/storage/PhragmentSnapshot.php',
'PhragmentSnapshotChild' => 'applications/phragment/storage/PhragmentSnapshotChild.php',
'PhragmentSnapshotChildQuery' => 'applications/phragment/query/PhragmentSnapshotChildQuery.php',
'PhragmentSnapshotCreateController' => 'applications/phragment/controller/PhragmentSnapshotCreateController.php',
'PhragmentSnapshotDeleteController' => 'applications/phragment/controller/PhragmentSnapshotDeleteController.php',
'PhragmentSnapshotPHIDType' => 'applications/phragment/phid/PhragmentSnapshotPHIDType.php',
'PhragmentSnapshotPromoteController' => 'applications/phragment/controller/PhragmentSnapshotPromoteController.php',
'PhragmentSnapshotQuery' => 'applications/phragment/query/PhragmentSnapshotQuery.php',
'PhragmentSnapshotViewController' => 'applications/phragment/controller/PhragmentSnapshotViewController.php',
'PhragmentUpdateController' => 'applications/phragment/controller/PhragmentUpdateController.php',
'PhragmentVersionController' => 'applications/phragment/controller/PhragmentVersionController.php',
'PhragmentZIPController' => 'applications/phragment/controller/PhragmentZIPController.php',
'PhrequentConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phrequent/conduit/PhrequentConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PhrequentController' => 'applications/phrequent/controller/PhrequentController.php',
'PhrequentDAO' => 'applications/phrequent/storage/PhrequentDAO.php',
'PhrequentListController' => 'applications/phrequent/controller/PhrequentListController.php',
'PhrequentPopConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phrequent/conduit/PhrequentPopConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PhrequentPushConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phrequent/conduit/PhrequentPushConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PhrequentSearchEngine' => 'applications/phrequent/query/PhrequentSearchEngine.php',
'PhrequentTimeBlock' => 'applications/phrequent/storage/PhrequentTimeBlock.php',
'PhrequentTimeBlockTestCase' => 'applications/phrequent/storage/__tests__/PhrequentTimeBlockTestCase.php',
'PhrequentTimeSlices' => 'applications/phrequent/storage/PhrequentTimeSlices.php',
'PhrequentTrackController' => 'applications/phrequent/controller/PhrequentTrackController.php',
'PhrequentTrackableInterface' => 'applications/phrequent/interface/PhrequentTrackableInterface.php',
'PhrequentTrackingConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phrequent/conduit/PhrequentTrackingConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PhrequentTrackingEditor' => 'applications/phrequent/editor/PhrequentTrackingEditor.php',
'PhrequentUIEventListener' => 'applications/phrequent/event/PhrequentUIEventListener.php',
'PhrequentUserTime' => 'applications/phrequent/storage/PhrequentUserTime.php',
'PhrequentUserTimeQuery' => 'applications/phrequent/query/PhrequentUserTimeQuery.php',
'PhrictionChangeType' => 'applications/phriction/constants/PhrictionChangeType.php',
'PhrictionConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phriction/conduit/PhrictionConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PhrictionConstants' => 'applications/phriction/constants/PhrictionConstants.php',
'PhrictionContent' => 'applications/phriction/storage/PhrictionContent.php',
'PhrictionController' => 'applications/phriction/controller/PhrictionController.php',
'PhrictionCreateConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phriction/conduit/PhrictionCreateConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PhrictionDAO' => 'applications/phriction/storage/PhrictionDAO.php',
'PhrictionDeleteController' => 'applications/phriction/controller/PhrictionDeleteController.php',
'PhrictionDiffController' => 'applications/phriction/controller/PhrictionDiffController.php',
'PhrictionDocument' => 'applications/phriction/storage/PhrictionDocument.php',
'PhrictionDocumentAuthorHeraldField' => 'applications/phriction/herald/PhrictionDocumentAuthorHeraldField.php',
'PhrictionDocumentContentHeraldField' => 'applications/phriction/herald/PhrictionDocumentContentHeraldField.php',
'PhrictionDocumentController' => 'applications/phriction/controller/PhrictionDocumentController.php',
'PhrictionDocumentHeraldAdapter' => 'applications/phriction/herald/PhrictionDocumentHeraldAdapter.php',
'PhrictionDocumentHeraldField' => 'applications/phriction/herald/PhrictionDocumentHeraldField.php',
'PhrictionDocumentHeraldFieldGroup' => 'applications/phriction/herald/PhrictionDocumentHeraldFieldGroup.php',
'PhrictionDocumentPHIDType' => 'applications/phriction/phid/PhrictionDocumentPHIDType.php',
'PhrictionDocumentPathHeraldField' => 'applications/phriction/herald/PhrictionDocumentPathHeraldField.php',
'PhrictionDocumentQuery' => 'applications/phriction/query/PhrictionDocumentQuery.php',
'PhrictionDocumentStatus' => 'applications/phriction/constants/PhrictionDocumentStatus.php',
'PhrictionDocumentTitleHeraldField' => 'applications/phriction/herald/PhrictionDocumentTitleHeraldField.php',
'PhrictionEditConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phriction/conduit/PhrictionEditConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PhrictionEditController' => 'applications/phriction/controller/PhrictionEditController.php',
'PhrictionHistoryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phriction/conduit/PhrictionHistoryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PhrictionHistoryController' => 'applications/phriction/controller/PhrictionHistoryController.php',
'PhrictionInfoConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/phriction/conduit/PhrictionInfoConduitAPIMethod.php',
'PhrictionListController' => 'applications/phriction/controller/PhrictionListController.php',
'PhrictionMoveController' => 'applications/phriction/controller/PhrictionMoveController.php',
'PhrictionNewController' => 'applications/phriction/controller/PhrictionNewController.php',
'PhrictionRemarkupRule' => 'applications/phriction/markup/PhrictionRemarkupRule.php',
'PhrictionReplyHandler' => 'applications/phriction/mail/PhrictionReplyHandler.php',
'PhrictionSchemaSpec' => 'applications/phriction/storage/PhrictionSchemaSpec.php',
'PhrictionSearchEngine' => 'applications/phriction/query/PhrictionSearchEngine.php',
Improve Search architecture Summary: The search indexing API has several problems right now: - Always runs in-process. - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it. - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster. - Instead, make the API phid-oriented. - No uniform indexing API. - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird. - Instead, provide a uniform API. - No uniform CLI. - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers. - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing. - Not application-oriented. - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world. - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader. Test Plan: - `bin/search index` - Indexed one revision, one task. - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types. - Indexed `--all`. - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it. - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing. - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing. - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: 20after4, aran Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 23:21:31 +01:00
'PhrictionSearchIndexer' => 'applications/phriction/search/PhrictionSearchIndexer.php',
'PhrictionTransaction' => 'applications/phriction/storage/PhrictionTransaction.php',
'PhrictionTransactionComment' => 'applications/phriction/storage/PhrictionTransactionComment.php',
'PhrictionTransactionEditor' => 'applications/phriction/editor/PhrictionTransactionEditor.php',
'PhrictionTransactionQuery' => 'applications/phriction/query/PhrictionTransactionQuery.php',
'PolicyLockOptionType' => 'applications/policy/config/PolicyLockOptionType.php',
'PonderAddAnswerView' => 'applications/ponder/view/PonderAddAnswerView.php',
'PonderAnswer' => 'applications/ponder/storage/PonderAnswer.php',
'PonderAnswerCommentController' => 'applications/ponder/controller/PonderAnswerCommentController.php',
'PonderAnswerEditController' => 'applications/ponder/controller/PonderAnswerEditController.php',
'PonderAnswerEditor' => 'applications/ponder/editor/PonderAnswerEditor.php',
'PonderAnswerHasVotingUserEdgeType' => 'applications/ponder/edge/PonderAnswerHasVotingUserEdgeType.php',
'PonderAnswerHistoryController' => 'applications/ponder/controller/PonderAnswerHistoryController.php',
'PonderAnswerMailReceiver' => 'applications/ponder/mail/PonderAnswerMailReceiver.php',
'PonderAnswerPHIDType' => 'applications/ponder/phid/PonderAnswerPHIDType.php',
'PonderAnswerQuery' => 'applications/ponder/query/PonderAnswerQuery.php',
'PonderAnswerReplyHandler' => 'applications/ponder/mail/PonderAnswerReplyHandler.php',
'PonderAnswerSaveController' => 'applications/ponder/controller/PonderAnswerSaveController.php',
'PonderAnswerStatus' => 'applications/ponder/constants/PonderAnswerStatus.php',
'PonderAnswerTransaction' => 'applications/ponder/storage/PonderAnswerTransaction.php',
'PonderAnswerTransactionComment' => 'applications/ponder/storage/PonderAnswerTransactionComment.php',
'PonderAnswerTransactionQuery' => 'applications/ponder/query/PonderAnswerTransactionQuery.php',
'PonderAnswerView' => 'applications/ponder/view/PonderAnswerView.php',
'PonderConstants' => 'applications/ponder/constants/PonderConstants.php',
'PonderController' => 'applications/ponder/controller/PonderController.php',
'PonderDAO' => 'applications/ponder/storage/PonderDAO.php',
'PonderDefaultViewCapability' => 'applications/ponder/capability/PonderDefaultViewCapability.php',
'PonderEditor' => 'applications/ponder/editor/PonderEditor.php',
'PonderFooterView' => 'applications/ponder/view/PonderFooterView.php',
'PonderHelpfulSaveController' => 'applications/ponder/controller/PonderHelpfulSaveController.php',
'PonderModerateCapability' => 'applications/ponder/capability/PonderModerateCapability.php',
'PonderQuestion' => 'applications/ponder/storage/PonderQuestion.php',
'PonderQuestionCommentController' => 'applications/ponder/controller/PonderQuestionCommentController.php',
'PonderQuestionEditController' => 'applications/ponder/controller/PonderQuestionEditController.php',
'PonderQuestionEditor' => 'applications/ponder/editor/PonderQuestionEditor.php',
'PonderQuestionHistoryController' => 'applications/ponder/controller/PonderQuestionHistoryController.php',
'PonderQuestionListController' => 'applications/ponder/controller/PonderQuestionListController.php',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'PonderQuestionMailReceiver' => 'applications/ponder/mail/PonderQuestionMailReceiver.php',
'PonderQuestionPHIDType' => 'applications/ponder/phid/PonderQuestionPHIDType.php',
'PonderQuestionQuery' => 'applications/ponder/query/PonderQuestionQuery.php',
'PonderQuestionReplyHandler' => 'applications/ponder/mail/PonderQuestionReplyHandler.php',
'PonderQuestionSearchEngine' => 'applications/ponder/query/PonderQuestionSearchEngine.php',
'PonderQuestionStatus' => 'applications/ponder/constants/PonderQuestionStatus.php',
'PonderQuestionStatusController' => 'applications/ponder/controller/PonderQuestionStatusController.php',
'PonderQuestionTransaction' => 'applications/ponder/storage/PonderQuestionTransaction.php',
'PonderQuestionTransactionComment' => 'applications/ponder/storage/PonderQuestionTransactionComment.php',
'PonderQuestionTransactionQuery' => 'applications/ponder/query/PonderQuestionTransactionQuery.php',
'PonderQuestionViewController' => 'applications/ponder/controller/PonderQuestionViewController.php',
'PonderRemarkupRule' => 'applications/ponder/remarkup/PonderRemarkupRule.php',
'PonderSchemaSpec' => 'applications/ponder/storage/PonderSchemaSpec.php',
Improve Search architecture Summary: The search indexing API has several problems right now: - Always runs in-process. - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it. - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster. - Instead, make the API phid-oriented. - No uniform indexing API. - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird. - Instead, provide a uniform API. - No uniform CLI. - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers. - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing. - Not application-oriented. - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world. - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader. Test Plan: - `bin/search index` - Indexed one revision, one task. - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types. - Indexed `--all`. - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it. - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing. - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing. - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: 20after4, aran Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 23:21:31 +01:00
'PonderSearchIndexer' => 'applications/ponder/search/PonderSearchIndexer.php',
'PonderVotableInterface' => 'applications/ponder/storage/PonderVotableInterface.php',
'PonderVote' => 'applications/ponder/constants/PonderVote.php',
'PonderVoteEditor' => 'applications/ponder/editor/PonderVoteEditor.php',
'PonderVotingUserHasAnswerEdgeType' => 'applications/ponder/edge/PonderVotingUserHasAnswerEdgeType.php',
'ProjectAddProjectsEmailCommand' => 'applications/project/command/ProjectAddProjectsEmailCommand.php',
'ProjectBoardTaskCard' => 'applications/project/view/ProjectBoardTaskCard.php',
'ProjectCanLockProjectsCapability' => 'applications/project/capability/ProjectCanLockProjectsCapability.php',
'ProjectConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/project/conduit/ProjectConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ProjectCreateConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/project/conduit/ProjectCreateConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ProjectCreateProjectsCapability' => 'applications/project/capability/ProjectCreateProjectsCapability.php',
'ProjectDefaultEditCapability' => 'applications/project/capability/ProjectDefaultEditCapability.php',
'ProjectDefaultJoinCapability' => 'applications/project/capability/ProjectDefaultJoinCapability.php',
'ProjectDefaultViewCapability' => 'applications/project/capability/ProjectDefaultViewCapability.php',
'ProjectQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/project/conduit/ProjectQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ProjectRemarkupRule' => 'applications/project/remarkup/ProjectRemarkupRule.php',
'ProjectRemarkupRuleTestCase' => 'applications/project/remarkup/__tests__/ProjectRemarkupRuleTestCase.php',
'ProjectReplyHandler' => 'applications/project/mail/ProjectReplyHandler.php',
'QueryFormattingTestCase' => 'infrastructure/storage/__tests__/QueryFormattingTestCase.php',
'ReleephAuthorFieldSpecification' => 'applications/releeph/field/specification/ReleephAuthorFieldSpecification.php',
'ReleephBranch' => 'applications/releeph/storage/ReleephBranch.php',
'ReleephBranchAccessController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/branch/ReleephBranchAccessController.php',
'ReleephBranchCommitFieldSpecification' => 'applications/releeph/field/specification/ReleephBranchCommitFieldSpecification.php',
'ReleephBranchController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/branch/ReleephBranchController.php',
'ReleephBranchCreateController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/branch/ReleephBranchCreateController.php',
'ReleephBranchEditController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/branch/ReleephBranchEditController.php',
'ReleephBranchEditor' => 'applications/releeph/editor/ReleephBranchEditor.php',
'ReleephBranchHistoryController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/branch/ReleephBranchHistoryController.php',
'ReleephBranchNamePreviewController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/branch/ReleephBranchNamePreviewController.php',
'ReleephBranchPHIDType' => 'applications/releeph/phid/ReleephBranchPHIDType.php',
'ReleephBranchPreviewView' => 'applications/releeph/view/branch/ReleephBranchPreviewView.php',
'ReleephBranchQuery' => 'applications/releeph/query/ReleephBranchQuery.php',
'ReleephBranchSearchEngine' => 'applications/releeph/query/ReleephBranchSearchEngine.php',
'ReleephBranchTemplate' => 'applications/releeph/view/branch/ReleephBranchTemplate.php',
'ReleephBranchTransaction' => 'applications/releeph/storage/ReleephBranchTransaction.php',
'ReleephBranchTransactionQuery' => 'applications/releeph/query/ReleephBranchTransactionQuery.php',
'ReleephBranchViewController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/branch/ReleephBranchViewController.php',
'ReleephCommitFinder' => 'applications/releeph/commitfinder/ReleephCommitFinder.php',
'ReleephCommitFinderException' => 'applications/releeph/commitfinder/ReleephCommitFinderException.php',
'ReleephCommitMessageFieldSpecification' => 'applications/releeph/field/specification/ReleephCommitMessageFieldSpecification.php',
'ReleephConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/releeph/conduit/ReleephConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ReleephController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/ReleephController.php',
'ReleephDAO' => 'applications/releeph/storage/ReleephDAO.php',
'ReleephDefaultFieldSelector' => 'applications/releeph/field/selector/ReleephDefaultFieldSelector.php',
'ReleephDependsOnFieldSpecification' => 'applications/releeph/field/specification/ReleephDependsOnFieldSpecification.php',
'ReleephDiffChurnFieldSpecification' => 'applications/releeph/field/specification/ReleephDiffChurnFieldSpecification.php',
'ReleephDiffMessageFieldSpecification' => 'applications/releeph/field/specification/ReleephDiffMessageFieldSpecification.php',
'ReleephDiffSizeFieldSpecification' => 'applications/releeph/field/specification/ReleephDiffSizeFieldSpecification.php',
'ReleephFieldParseException' => 'applications/releeph/field/exception/ReleephFieldParseException.php',
'ReleephFieldSelector' => 'applications/releeph/field/selector/ReleephFieldSelector.php',
'ReleephFieldSpecification' => 'applications/releeph/field/specification/ReleephFieldSpecification.php',
'ReleephGetBranchesConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/releeph/conduit/ReleephGetBranchesConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ReleephIntentFieldSpecification' => 'applications/releeph/field/specification/ReleephIntentFieldSpecification.php',
'ReleephLevelFieldSpecification' => 'applications/releeph/field/specification/ReleephLevelFieldSpecification.php',
'ReleephOriginalCommitFieldSpecification' => 'applications/releeph/field/specification/ReleephOriginalCommitFieldSpecification.php',
'ReleephProductActionController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/product/ReleephProductActionController.php',
'ReleephProductController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/product/ReleephProductController.php',
'ReleephProductCreateController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/product/ReleephProductCreateController.php',
'ReleephProductEditController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/product/ReleephProductEditController.php',
'ReleephProductEditor' => 'applications/releeph/editor/ReleephProductEditor.php',
'ReleephProductHistoryController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/product/ReleephProductHistoryController.php',
'ReleephProductListController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/product/ReleephProductListController.php',
'ReleephProductPHIDType' => 'applications/releeph/phid/ReleephProductPHIDType.php',
'ReleephProductQuery' => 'applications/releeph/query/ReleephProductQuery.php',
'ReleephProductSearchEngine' => 'applications/releeph/query/ReleephProductSearchEngine.php',
'ReleephProductTransaction' => 'applications/releeph/storage/ReleephProductTransaction.php',
'ReleephProductTransactionQuery' => 'applications/releeph/query/ReleephProductTransactionQuery.php',
'ReleephProductViewController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/product/ReleephProductViewController.php',
'ReleephProject' => 'applications/releeph/storage/ReleephProject.php',
'ReleephQueryBranchesConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/releeph/conduit/ReleephQueryBranchesConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ReleephQueryProductsConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/releeph/conduit/ReleephQueryProductsConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ReleephQueryRequestsConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/releeph/conduit/ReleephQueryRequestsConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ReleephReasonFieldSpecification' => 'applications/releeph/field/specification/ReleephReasonFieldSpecification.php',
'ReleephRequest' => 'applications/releeph/storage/ReleephRequest.php',
'ReleephRequestActionController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/request/ReleephRequestActionController.php',
'ReleephRequestCommentController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/request/ReleephRequestCommentController.php',
'ReleephRequestConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/releeph/conduit/ReleephRequestConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ReleephRequestController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/request/ReleephRequestController.php',
'ReleephRequestDifferentialCreateController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/request/ReleephRequestDifferentialCreateController.php',
'ReleephRequestEditController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/request/ReleephRequestEditController.php',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'ReleephRequestMailReceiver' => 'applications/releeph/mail/ReleephRequestMailReceiver.php',
'ReleephRequestPHIDType' => 'applications/releeph/phid/ReleephRequestPHIDType.php',
'ReleephRequestQuery' => 'applications/releeph/query/ReleephRequestQuery.php',
'ReleephRequestReplyHandler' => 'applications/releeph/mail/ReleephRequestReplyHandler.php',
'ReleephRequestSearchEngine' => 'applications/releeph/query/ReleephRequestSearchEngine.php',
'ReleephRequestStatus' => 'applications/releeph/constants/ReleephRequestStatus.php',
'ReleephRequestTransaction' => 'applications/releeph/storage/ReleephRequestTransaction.php',
'ReleephRequestTransactionComment' => 'applications/releeph/storage/ReleephRequestTransactionComment.php',
'ReleephRequestTransactionQuery' => 'applications/releeph/query/ReleephRequestTransactionQuery.php',
'ReleephRequestTransactionalEditor' => 'applications/releeph/editor/ReleephRequestTransactionalEditor.php',
'ReleephRequestTypeaheadControl' => 'applications/releeph/view/request/ReleephRequestTypeaheadControl.php',
'ReleephRequestTypeaheadController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/request/ReleephRequestTypeaheadController.php',
'ReleephRequestView' => 'applications/releeph/view/ReleephRequestView.php',
'ReleephRequestViewController' => 'applications/releeph/controller/request/ReleephRequestViewController.php',
'ReleephRequestorFieldSpecification' => 'applications/releeph/field/specification/ReleephRequestorFieldSpecification.php',
'ReleephRevisionFieldSpecification' => 'applications/releeph/field/specification/ReleephRevisionFieldSpecification.php',
'ReleephSeverityFieldSpecification' => 'applications/releeph/field/specification/ReleephSeverityFieldSpecification.php',
'ReleephSummaryFieldSpecification' => 'applications/releeph/field/specification/ReleephSummaryFieldSpecification.php',
'ReleephWorkCanPushConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/releeph/conduit/work/ReleephWorkCanPushConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ReleephWorkGetAuthorInfoConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/releeph/conduit/work/ReleephWorkGetAuthorInfoConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ReleephWorkGetBranchCommitMessageConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/releeph/conduit/work/ReleephWorkGetBranchCommitMessageConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ReleephWorkGetBranchConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/releeph/conduit/work/ReleephWorkGetBranchConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ReleephWorkGetCommitMessageConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/releeph/conduit/work/ReleephWorkGetCommitMessageConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ReleephWorkNextRequestConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/releeph/conduit/work/ReleephWorkNextRequestConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ReleephWorkRecordConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/releeph/conduit/work/ReleephWorkRecordConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ReleephWorkRecordPickStatusConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/releeph/conduit/work/ReleephWorkRecordPickStatusConduitAPIMethod.php',
'RemarkupProcessConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/remarkup/conduit/RemarkupProcessConduitAPIMethod.php',
'RepositoryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/repository/conduit/RepositoryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'RepositoryCreateConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/repository/conduit/RepositoryCreateConduitAPIMethod.php',
'RepositoryQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/repository/conduit/RepositoryQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'ShellLogView' => 'applications/harbormaster/view/ShellLogView.php',
'SlowvoteConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/slowvote/conduit/SlowvoteConduitAPIMethod.php',
'SlowvoteEmbedView' => 'applications/slowvote/view/SlowvoteEmbedView.php',
'SlowvoteInfoConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/slowvote/conduit/SlowvoteInfoConduitAPIMethod.php',
'SlowvoteRemarkupRule' => 'applications/slowvote/remarkup/SlowvoteRemarkupRule.php',
'SubscriptionListDialogBuilder' => 'applications/subscriptions/view/SubscriptionListDialogBuilder.php',
'SubscriptionListStringBuilder' => 'applications/subscriptions/view/SubscriptionListStringBuilder.php',
'TokenConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/tokens/conduit/TokenConduitAPIMethod.php',
'TokenGiveConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/tokens/conduit/TokenGiveConduitAPIMethod.php',
'TokenGivenConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/tokens/conduit/TokenGivenConduitAPIMethod.php',
'TokenQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/tokens/conduit/TokenQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'UserConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/people/conduit/UserConduitAPIMethod.php',
'UserDisableConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/people/conduit/UserDisableConduitAPIMethod.php',
'UserEnableConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/people/conduit/UserEnableConduitAPIMethod.php',
'UserFindConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/people/conduit/UserFindConduitAPIMethod.php',
'UserQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/people/conduit/UserQueryConduitAPIMethod.php',
'UserWhoAmIConduitAPIMethod' => 'applications/people/conduit/UserWhoAmIConduitAPIMethod.php',
),
'function' => array(
'celerity_generate_unique_node_id' => 'applications/celerity/api.php',
'celerity_get_resource_uri' => 'applications/celerity/api.php',
'javelin_tag' => 'infrastructure/javelin/markup.php',
'phabricator_date' => 'view/viewutils.php',
'phabricator_datetime' => 'view/viewutils.php',
'phabricator_form' => 'infrastructure/javelin/markup.php',
'phabricator_format_local_time' => 'view/viewutils.php',
'phabricator_relative_date' => 'view/viewutils.php',
'phabricator_time' => 'view/viewutils.php',
'phid_get_subtype' => 'applications/phid/utils.php',
'phid_get_type' => 'applications/phid/utils.php',
'phid_group_by_type' => 'applications/phid/utils.php',
'require_celerity_resource' => 'applications/celerity/api.php',
),
'xmap' => array(
'AlmanacAddress' => 'Phobject',
'AlmanacBinding' => array(
'AlmanacDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'AlmanacPropertyInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'AlmanacBindingEditController' => 'AlmanacServiceController',
'AlmanacBindingEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'AlmanacBindingPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'AlmanacBindingQuery' => 'AlmanacQuery',
'AlmanacBindingTableView' => 'AphrontView',
'AlmanacBindingTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'AlmanacBindingTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'AlmanacBindingViewController' => 'AlmanacServiceController',
'AlmanacClusterDatabaseServiceType' => 'AlmanacClusterServiceType',
'AlmanacClusterRepositoryServiceType' => 'AlmanacClusterServiceType',
'AlmanacClusterServiceType' => 'AlmanacServiceType',
'AlmanacConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'AlmanacConsoleController' => 'AlmanacController',
'AlmanacController' => 'PhabricatorController',
2014-11-06 00:27:16 +01:00
'AlmanacCoreCustomField' => array(
'AlmanacCustomField',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldInterface',
),
'AlmanacCreateClusterServicesCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'AlmanacCreateDevicesCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'AlmanacCreateNetworksCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'AlmanacCreateServicesCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
2014-11-06 00:27:16 +01:00
'AlmanacCustomField' => 'PhabricatorCustomField',
'AlmanacCustomServiceType' => 'AlmanacServiceType',
'AlmanacDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'AlmanacDevice' => array(
'AlmanacDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
'PhabricatorSSHPublicKeyInterface',
'AlmanacPropertyInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'AlmanacDeviceController' => 'AlmanacController',
'AlmanacDeviceEditController' => 'AlmanacDeviceController',
'AlmanacDeviceEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'AlmanacDeviceListController' => 'AlmanacDeviceController',
'AlmanacDevicePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'AlmanacDeviceQuery' => 'AlmanacQuery',
'AlmanacDeviceSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'AlmanacDeviceTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'AlmanacDeviceTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'AlmanacDeviceViewController' => 'AlmanacDeviceController',
'AlmanacDrydockPoolServiceType' => 'AlmanacServiceType',
'AlmanacInterface' => array(
'AlmanacDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'AlmanacInterfaceDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'AlmanacInterfaceEditController' => 'AlmanacDeviceController',
'AlmanacInterfacePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'AlmanacInterfaceQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'AlmanacInterfaceTableView' => 'AphrontView',
'AlmanacKeys' => 'Phobject',
'AlmanacManagementLockWorkflow' => 'AlmanacManagementWorkflow',
'AlmanacManagementRegisterWorkflow' => 'AlmanacManagementWorkflow',
'AlmanacManagementTrustKeyWorkflow' => 'AlmanacManagementWorkflow',
'AlmanacManagementUnlockWorkflow' => 'AlmanacManagementWorkflow',
'AlmanacManagementUntrustKeyWorkflow' => 'AlmanacManagementWorkflow',
'AlmanacManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'AlmanacNames' => 'Phobject',
'AlmanacNamesTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'AlmanacNetwork' => array(
'AlmanacDAO',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'AlmanacNetworkController' => 'AlmanacController',
'AlmanacNetworkEditController' => 'AlmanacNetworkController',
'AlmanacNetworkEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'AlmanacNetworkListController' => 'AlmanacNetworkController',
'AlmanacNetworkPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'AlmanacNetworkQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'AlmanacNetworkSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'AlmanacNetworkTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'AlmanacNetworkTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'AlmanacNetworkViewController' => 'AlmanacNetworkController',
2014-11-06 00:27:16 +01:00
'AlmanacProperty' => array(
'PhabricatorCustomFieldStorage',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'AlmanacPropertyController' => 'AlmanacController',
'AlmanacPropertyDeleteController' => 'AlmanacDeviceController',
2014-11-06 00:27:16 +01:00
'AlmanacPropertyEditController' => 'AlmanacDeviceController',
'AlmanacPropertyQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'AlmanacQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'AlmanacQueryDevicesConduitAPIMethod' => 'AlmanacConduitAPIMethod',
'AlmanacQueryServicesConduitAPIMethod' => 'AlmanacConduitAPIMethod',
'AlmanacSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'AlmanacService' => array(
'AlmanacDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
2014-11-06 00:27:16 +01:00
'PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
2014-11-06 00:27:16 +01:00
'AlmanacPropertyInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'AlmanacServiceController' => 'AlmanacController',
'AlmanacServiceDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'AlmanacServiceEditController' => 'AlmanacServiceController',
'AlmanacServiceEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'AlmanacServiceListController' => 'AlmanacServiceController',
'AlmanacServicePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'AlmanacServiceQuery' => 'AlmanacQuery',
'AlmanacServiceSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'AlmanacServiceTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'AlmanacServiceTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'AlmanacServiceType' => 'Phobject',
'AlmanacServiceTypeTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'AlmanacServiceViewController' => 'AlmanacServiceController',
'AphlictDropdownDataQuery' => 'Phobject',
'Aphront304Response' => 'AphrontResponse',
'Aphront400Response' => 'AphrontResponse',
2012-11-29 08:57:13 +01:00
'Aphront403Response' => 'AphrontHTMLResponse',
'Aphront404Response' => 'AphrontHTMLResponse',
2011-01-25 20:57:47 +01:00
'AphrontAjaxResponse' => 'AphrontResponse',
'AphrontApplicationConfiguration' => 'Phobject',
'AphrontBarView' => 'AphrontView',
'AphrontBoolHTTPParameterType' => 'AphrontHTTPParameterType',
Fix conservative CSRF token cycling limit Summary: We currently cycle CSRF tokens every hour and check for the last two valid ones. This means that a form could go stale in as little as an hour, and is certainly stale after two. When a stale form is submitted, you basically get a terrible heisen-state where some of your data might persist if you're lucky but more likely it all just vanishes. The .js file below outlines some more details. This is a pretty terrible UX and we don't need to be as conservative about CSRF validation as we're being. Remedy this problem by: - Accepting the last 6 CSRF tokens instead of the last 1 (i.e., pages are valid for at least 6 hours, and for as long as 7). - Using JS to refresh the CSRF token every 55 minutes (i.e., pages connected to the internet are valid indefinitely). - Showing the user an explicit message about what went wrong when CSRF validation fails so the experience is less bewildering. They should now only be able to submit with a bad CSRF token if: - They load a page, disconnect from the internet for 7 hours, reconnect, and submit the form within 55 minutes; or - They are actually the victim of a CSRF attack. We could eventually fix the first one by tracking reconnects, which might be "free" once the notification server gets built. It will probably never be an issue in practice. Test Plan: - Reduced CSRF cycle frequency to 2 seconds, submitted a form after 15 seconds, got the CSRF exception. - Reduced csrf-refresh cycle frequency to 3 seconds, submitted a form after 15 seconds, got a clean form post. - Added debugging code the the csrf refresh to make sure it was doing sensible things (pulling different tokens, finding all the inputs). Reviewed By: aran Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran CC: aran, epriestley Differential Revision: 660
2011-07-13 23:05:18 +02:00
'AphrontCSRFException' => 'AphrontException',
'AphrontCalendarEventView' => 'AphrontView',
'AphrontController' => 'Phobject',
Rename "IDPaged" to "CursorPaged", "executeWithPager" to "executeWith[Cursor|Offset]Pager" Summary: I'm trying to make progress on the policy/visibility stuff since it's a blocker for Wikimedia. First, I want to improve Projects so they can serve as policy groups (e.g., an object can have a visibility policy like "Visible to: members of project 'security'"). However, doing this without breaking anything or snowballing into a bigger change is a bit awkward because Projects are name-ordered and we have a Conduit API which does offset paging. Rather than breaking or rewriting this stuff, I want to just continue offset paging them for now. So I'm going to make PhabricatorPolicyQuery extend PhabricatorOffsetPagedQuery, but can't currently since the `executeWithPager` methods would clash. These methods do different things anyway and are probably better with different names. This also generally improves the names of these classes, since cursors are not necessarily IDs (in the feed case, they're "chronlogicalKeys", for example). I did leave some of the interals as "ID" since calling them "Cursor"s (e.g., `setAfterCursor()`) seemed a little wrong -- it should maybe be `setAfterCursorPosition()`. These APIs have very limited use and can easily be made more consistent later. Test Plan: Browsed around various affected tools; any issues here should throw/fail in a loud/obvious way. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan Reviewed By: vrana CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T603 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3177
2012-08-07 20:54:06 +02:00
'AphrontCursorPagerView' => 'AphrontView',
'AphrontDefaultApplicationConfiguration' => 'AphrontApplicationConfiguration',
'AphrontDialogResponse' => 'AphrontResponse',
'AphrontDialogView' => array(
'AphrontView',
'AphrontResponseProducerInterface',
),
'AphrontException' => 'Exception',
2011-01-23 03:33:00 +01:00
'AphrontFileResponse' => 'AphrontResponse',
2011-01-26 02:40:21 +01:00
'AphrontFormCheckboxControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'AphrontFormChooseButtonControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'AphrontFormControl' => 'AphrontView',
'AphrontFormDateControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'AphrontFormDateControlValue' => 'Phobject',
'AphrontFormDividerControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
2011-01-23 03:33:00 +01:00
'AphrontFormFileControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'AphrontFormHandlesControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
2011-01-24 20:36:53 +01:00
'AphrontFormMarkupControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'AphrontFormPasswordControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
Add basic per-object privacy policies Summary: Provides a basic start for access policies. Objects expose various capabilities, like CAN_VIEW, CAN_EDIT, etc., and set a policy for each capability. We currently implement three policies, PUBLIC (anyone, including logged-out), USERS (any logged-in) and NOONE (nobody). There's also a way to provide automatic capability grants (e.g., the owner of an object can always see it, even if some capability is set to "NOONE"), but I'm not sure how great the implementation feels and it might change. Most of the code here is providing a primitive for efficient policy-aware list queries. The problem with doing queries naively is that you have to do crazy amounts of filtering, e.g. to show the user page 6, you need to filter at least 600 objects (and likely more) before you can figure out which ones are 500-600 for them. You can't just do "LIMIT 500, 100" because that might have only 50 results, or no results. Instead, the query looks like "WHERE id > last_visible_id", and then we fetch additional pages as necessary to satisfy the request. The general idea is that we move all data access to Query classes and have them do object filtering. The ID paging primitive allows efficient paging in most cases, and the executeOne() method provides a concise way to do policy checks for edit/view screens. We'll probably end up with mostly broader policy UIs or configuration-based policies, but there are at least a few cases for per-object privacy (e.g., marking tasks as "Security", and restricting things to the members of projects) so I figured we'd start with a flexible primitive and the simplify it in the UI where we can. Test Plan: Unit tests, played around in the UI with various policy settings. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T603 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2210
2012-04-14 19:13:29 +02:00
'AphrontFormPolicyControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'AphrontFormRadioButtonControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'AphrontFormRecaptchaControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'AphrontFormSelectControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
2011-01-23 03:33:00 +01:00
'AphrontFormStaticControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'AphrontFormSubmitControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'AphrontFormTextAreaControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'AphrontFormTextControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'AphrontFormTextWithSubmitControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
2011-01-25 22:48:05 +01:00
'AphrontFormTokenizerControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'AphrontFormTypeaheadControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'AphrontFormView' => 'AphrontView',
'AphrontGlyphBarView' => 'AphrontBarView',
2012-11-29 08:57:13 +01:00
'AphrontHTMLResponse' => 'AphrontResponse',
'AphrontHTTPParameterType' => 'Phobject',
'AphrontHTTPProxyResponse' => 'AphrontResponse',
'AphrontHTTPSink' => 'Phobject',
'AphrontHTTPSinkTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'AphrontIntHTTPParameterType' => 'AphrontHTTPParameterType',
'AphrontIsolatedDatabaseConnectionTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'AphrontIsolatedHTTPSink' => 'AphrontHTTPSink',
'AphrontJSONResponse' => 'AphrontResponse',
'AphrontJavelinView' => 'AphrontView',
'AphrontKeyboardShortcutsAvailableView' => 'AphrontView',
'AphrontListFilterView' => 'AphrontView',
'AphrontListHTTPParameterType' => 'AphrontHTTPParameterType',
'AphrontMalformedRequestException' => 'AphrontException',
'AphrontMoreView' => 'AphrontView',
'AphrontMultiColumnView' => 'AphrontView',
'AphrontMySQLDatabaseConnectionTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'AphrontNullView' => 'AphrontView',
'AphrontPHIDHTTPParameterType' => 'AphrontHTTPParameterType',
'AphrontPHIDListHTTPParameterType' => 'AphrontListHTTPParameterType',
'AphrontPHPHTTPSink' => 'AphrontHTTPSink',
'AphrontPageView' => 'AphrontView',
'AphrontPlainTextResponse' => 'AphrontResponse',
'AphrontProgressBarView' => 'AphrontBarView',
'AphrontProjectListHTTPParameterType' => 'AphrontListHTTPParameterType',
'AphrontProxyResponse' => array(
'AphrontResponse',
'AphrontResponseProducerInterface',
),
'AphrontRedirectResponse' => 'AphrontResponse',
'AphrontRedirectResponseTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'AphrontReloadResponse' => 'AphrontRedirectResponse',
'AphrontRequest' => 'Phobject',
'AphrontRequestExceptionHandler' => 'Phobject',
'AphrontRequestTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'AphrontResponse' => 'Phobject',
'AphrontRoutingMap' => 'Phobject',
'AphrontRoutingResult' => 'Phobject',
'AphrontSelectHTTPParameterType' => 'AphrontHTTPParameterType',
'AphrontSideNavFilterView' => 'AphrontView',
'AphrontSite' => 'Phobject',
'AphrontStackTraceView' => 'AphrontView',
Improve top-level exception handling Summary: Fixes T6692. Addresses two main issues: - The write guard would sometimes not get disposed of on exception pathways, generating an unnecessary secondary error which was just a symptom of the original root error. - This was generally confusing and reduced the quality of reports we received because users would report the symptomatic error sometimes instead of the real error. - Instead, reflow the handling so that we always dispose of the write guard if we create one. - If we missed the Controller-level error page generation (normally, a nice page with full CSS, etc), we'd jump straight to Startup-level error page generation (very basic plain text). - A large class of errors occur too early or too late to be handled by Controller-level pages, but many of these errors are not fundamental, and the plain text page is excessively severe. - Provide a mid-level simple HTML error page for errors which can't get full CSS, but also aren't so fundamental that we have no recourse but plain text. Test Plan: Mid-level errors now produce an intentional-looking error page: {F259885} Verified that setup errors still render properly. @chad, feel free to tweak the exception page -- I just did a rough pass on it. Like the setup error stuff, it doesn't have Celerity, so we can't use `{$colors}` and no other CSS will be loaded. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley, chad Maniphest Tasks: T6692 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11126
2015-01-02 19:49:27 +01:00
'AphrontStandaloneHTMLResponse' => 'AphrontHTMLResponse',
'AphrontStringHTTPParameterType' => 'AphrontHTTPParameterType',
'AphrontStringListHTTPParameterType' => 'AphrontListHTTPParameterType',
'AphrontTableView' => 'AphrontView',
'AphrontTagView' => 'AphrontView',
2011-03-23 04:41:02 +01:00
'AphrontTokenizerTemplateView' => 'AphrontView',
2011-04-04 04:20:47 +02:00
'AphrontTypeaheadTemplateView' => 'AphrontView',
Improve top-level exception handling Summary: Fixes T6692. Addresses two main issues: - The write guard would sometimes not get disposed of on exception pathways, generating an unnecessary secondary error which was just a symptom of the original root error. - This was generally confusing and reduced the quality of reports we received because users would report the symptomatic error sometimes instead of the real error. - Instead, reflow the handling so that we always dispose of the write guard if we create one. - If we missed the Controller-level error page generation (normally, a nice page with full CSS, etc), we'd jump straight to Startup-level error page generation (very basic plain text). - A large class of errors occur too early or too late to be handled by Controller-level pages, but many of these errors are not fundamental, and the plain text page is excessively severe. - Provide a mid-level simple HTML error page for errors which can't get full CSS, but also aren't so fundamental that we have no recourse but plain text. Test Plan: Mid-level errors now produce an intentional-looking error page: {F259885} Verified that setup errors still render properly. @chad, feel free to tweak the exception page -- I just did a rough pass on it. Like the setup error stuff, it doesn't have Celerity, so we can't use `{$colors}` and no other CSS will be loaded. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley, chad Maniphest Tasks: T6692 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11126
2015-01-02 19:49:27 +01:00
'AphrontUnhandledExceptionResponse' => 'AphrontStandaloneHTMLResponse',
'AphrontUserListHTTPParameterType' => 'AphrontListHTTPParameterType',
'AphrontView' => array(
'Phobject',
'PhutilSafeHTMLProducerInterface',
),
2012-11-29 08:57:13 +01:00
'AphrontWebpageResponse' => 'AphrontHTMLResponse',
'ArcanistConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'AuditConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'AuditQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'AuditConduitAPIMethod',
'AuthManageProvidersCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'CalendarTimeUtil' => 'Phobject',
'CalendarTimeUtilTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'CelerityAPI' => 'Phobject',
'CelerityDefaultPostprocessor' => 'CelerityPostprocessor',
'CelerityHighContrastPostprocessor' => 'CelerityPostprocessor',
'CelerityLargeFontPostprocessor' => 'CelerityPostprocessor',
'CelerityManagementMapWorkflow' => 'CelerityManagementWorkflow',
'CelerityManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'CelerityPhabricatorResourceController' => 'CelerityResourceController',
'CelerityPhabricatorResources' => 'CelerityResourcesOnDisk',
'CelerityPhysicalResources' => 'CelerityResources',
'CelerityPhysicalResourcesTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'CelerityPostprocessor' => 'Phobject',
'CelerityPostprocessorTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'CelerityResourceController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'CelerityResourceGraph' => 'AbstractDirectedGraph',
'CelerityResourceMap' => 'Phobject',
'CelerityResourceMapGenerator' => 'Phobject',
'CelerityResourceTransformer' => 'Phobject',
'CelerityResourceTransformerTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'CelerityResources' => 'Phobject',
'CelerityResourcesOnDisk' => 'CelerityPhysicalResources',
'CeleritySpriteGenerator' => 'Phobject',
'CelerityStaticResourceResponse' => 'Phobject',
'ChatLogConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'ChatLogQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'ChatLogConduitAPIMethod',
'ChatLogRecordConduitAPIMethod' => 'ChatLogConduitAPIMethod',
'ConduitAPIMethod' => array(
'Phobject',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'ConduitAPIMethodTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'ConduitAPIRequest' => 'Phobject',
'ConduitAPIResponse' => 'Phobject',
'ConduitApplicationNotInstalledException' => 'ConduitMethodNotFoundException',
'ConduitBoolParameterType' => 'ConduitListParameterType',
'ConduitCall' => 'Phobject',
'ConduitCallTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'ConduitConnectConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'ConduitConnectionGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'ConduitDeprecatedCallSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'ConduitEpochParameterType' => 'ConduitListParameterType',
'ConduitException' => 'Exception',
'ConduitGetCapabilitiesConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'ConduitGetCertificateConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'ConduitIntListParameterType' => 'ConduitListParameterType',
'ConduitIntParameterType' => 'ConduitListParameterType',
'ConduitListParameterType' => 'ConduitParameterType',
'ConduitLogGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'ConduitMethodDoesNotExistException' => 'ConduitMethodNotFoundException',
'ConduitMethodNotFoundException' => 'ConduitException',
'ConduitPHIDListParameterType' => 'ConduitListParameterType',
'ConduitParameterType' => 'Phobject',
'ConduitPingConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'ConduitProjectListParameterType' => 'ConduitListParameterType',
'ConduitQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'ConduitResultSearchEngineExtension' => 'PhabricatorSearchEngineExtension',
Implement SSHD glue and Conduit SSH endpoint Summary: - Build "sshd-auth" (for authentication) and "sshd-exec" (for command execution) binaries. These are callable by "sshd-vcs", located [[https://github.com/epriestley/sshd-vcs | in my account on GitHub]]. They are based on precursors [[https://github.com/epriestley/sshd-vcs-glue | here on GitHub]] which I deployed for TenXer about a year ago, so I have some confidence they at least basically work. - The problem this solves is that normally every user would need an account on a machine to connect to it, and/or their public keys would all need to be listed in `~/.authorized_keys`. This is a big pain in most installs. Software like Gitosis/Gitolite solve this problem by giving you an easy way to add public keys to `~/.authorized_keys`, but this is pretty gross. - Roughly, instead of looking in `~/.authorized_keys` when a user connects, the patched sshd instead runs `echo <public key> | sshd-auth`. The `sshd-auth` script looks up the public key and authorizes the matching user, if they exist. It also forces sshd to run `sshd-exec` instead of a normal shell. - `sshd-exec` receives the authenticated user and any command which was passed to ssh (like `git receive-pack`) and can route them appropriately. - Overall, this permits a single account to be set up on a server which all Phabricator users can connect to without any extra work, and which can safely execute commands and apply appropriate permissions, and disable users when they are disabled in Phabricator and all that stuff. - Build out "sshd-exec" to do more thorough checks and setup, and delegate command execution to Workflows (they now exist, and did not when I originally built this stuff). - Convert @btrahan's conduit API script into a workflow and slightly simplify it (ConduitCall did not exist at the time it was written). The next steps here on the Repository side are to implement Workflows for Git, SVN and HG wire protocols. These will mostly just proxy the protocols, but also need to enforce permissions. So the approach will basically be: - Implement workflows for stuff like `git receive-pack`. - These workflows will implement enough of the underlying protocol to determine what resource the user is trying to access, and whether they want to read or write it. - They'll then do a permissons check, and kick the user out if they don't have permission to do whatever they are trying to do. - If the user does have permission, we just proxy the rest of the transaction. Next steps on the Conduit side are more simple: - Make ConduitClient understand "ssh://" URLs. Test Plan: Ran `sshd-exec --phabricator-ssh-user epriestley conduit differential.query`, etc. This will get a more comprehensive test once I set up sshd-vcs. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T603, T550 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4229
2012-12-19 20:08:07 +01:00
'ConduitSSHWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorSSHWorkflow',
'ConduitStringListParameterType' => 'ConduitListParameterType',
'ConduitStringParameterType' => 'ConduitListParameterType',
Add Conduit Tokens to make authentication in Conduit somewhat more sane Summary: Ref T5955. Summary of intended changes: **Improve Granularity of Authorization**: Currently, users have one Conduit Certificate. This isn't very flexible, and means that you can't ever generate an API token with limited permissions or IP block controls (see T6706). This moves toward a world where you can generate multiple tokens, revoke them individually, and assign disparate privileges to them. **Standardize Token Management**: This moves Conduit to work the same way that sessions, OAuth authorizations, and temporary tokens already work, instead of being this crazy bizarre mess. **Make Authentication Faster**: Authentication currently requires a handshake (conduit.connect) to establish a session, like the web UI. This is unnecessary from a security point of view and puts an extra round trip in front of all Conduit activity. Essentially no other API anywhere works like this. **Make Authentication Simpler**: The handshake is complex, and involves deriving hashes. The session is also complex, and creates issues like T4377. Handshake and session management require different inputs. **Make Token Management Simpler**: The certificate is this huge long thing right now, which is not necessary from a security perspective. There are separate Arcanist handshake tokens, but they have a different set of issues. We can move forward to a token management world where neither of these problems exist. **Lower Protocol Barrier**: The simplest possible API client is very complex right now. It should be `curl`. Simplifying authentication is a necessary step toward this. **Unblock T2783**: T2783 is blocked on nodes in the cluster making authenticated API calls to other nodes. This provides a simpler way forward than the handshake mess (or enormous-hack-mess) which would currently be required. Test Plan: - Generated tokens. - Generated tokens for a bot account. - Terminated tokens (and for a bot account). - Terminated all tokens (and for a bot account). - Ran GC and saw it reap all the expired tokens. NOTE: These tokens can not actually be used to authenticate yet! {F249658} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T5955 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10985
2014-12-15 20:14:23 +01:00
'ConduitTokenGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'ConduitUserListParameterType' => 'ConduitListParameterType',
Conpherence - make the durable column kind of work and stuff Summary: Ref T7014. This hooks up the durable column such that when you open it up it loads your most recent Conpherence. You can then switch amongst the various widgets and stuff and everything works nicely. Except... - scroll bar does not work - also doesn't work at HEAD when I add a ton of text to the UI with no changes? (wrapped $copy in array_fill(0, 1000, $copy)) - "widget selector" does not collapse when you select something else - this part wasn't really specified so I used the aphlict dropdown stuff. didn't want to keep working on that if this was the wrong UI choice - can not edit title - do we still want that to be done by clicking on the title, which pops a dialogue? - can not add participants or calendar events - what should this UI be? maybe just a button on the top for "participants" and a button on the bottom for calendar? both on top? - this is not pixel perfect to the mock or two I've seen around. Aside from generally being bad at that, I definitely didn't get the name + timestamps formatting correctly, because the standard DOM of that has timestamp FIRST which appears second due to a "float right". Seemed like a lot of special-casing for what might not even be that important in the UI so I punted. (And again, there's likely many unknown ways in which this isn't pixel perfect) There's also code quality issues - `ConpherenceWidgetConfigConstants` is hopefully temporary or at least gets more sleek as we keep progressing here - copied some CSS from main Conpherence app - DOM structure is pretty different - there's some minor CSS tweaks too given the different width (not to mention the DOM structure being different) - copied some JS from behavior-pontificate.js to sync threads relative to aphlict updates - JS in general is like a better version of existing JS; these should collapse I'd hope? - maybe the aphlict-behavior-dropdown change was badsauce? ...but all that said, this definitely feels really nice and I feel like adding stuff is going to be really easy compared to how normal Conpherence is. Also includes a bonus bug fix - we now correctly update participation. The user would encounter this issue if they were in a conpherence that got some updates and then they went to a different page; they would have unread status for the messages that were ajax'd in. This patch fixes that by making sure we mark participation up to date with the proper transaction in all cases. Test Plan: hit "\" to invoke the column and saw nice loading UI and my latest conpherence load. sent messages and verified they received A-OK by looking in DOM console. toggled various widges and verified they rendered correctly. opened up a second browser with a second user on the thread, sent a message, and it was received in a nice asynchronous fashion Reviewers: chad, epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7014 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11968
2015-03-05 19:33:39 +01:00
'ConpherenceColumnViewController' => 'ConpherenceController',
'ConpherenceConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'ConpherenceConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'ConpherenceConstants' => 'Phobject',
'ConpherenceController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'ConpherenceCreateThreadConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConpherenceConduitAPIMethod',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'ConpherenceCreateThreadMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorMailReceiver',
'ConpherenceDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'ConpherenceDurableColumnView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'ConpherenceEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'ConpherenceFormDragAndDropUploadControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'ConpherenceFulltextQuery' => 'PhabricatorOffsetPagedQuery',
'ConpherenceHovercardEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
'ConpherenceImageData' => 'ConpherenceConstants',
'ConpherenceIndex' => 'ConpherenceDAO',
'ConpherenceLayoutView' => 'AphrontView',
'ConpherenceListController' => 'ConpherenceController',
'ConpherenceMenuItemView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'ConpherenceNewRoomController' => 'ConpherenceController',
'ConpherenceNotificationPanelController' => 'ConpherenceController',
'ConpherenceParticipant' => 'ConpherenceDAO',
'ConpherenceParticipantCountQuery' => 'PhabricatorOffsetPagedQuery',
'ConpherenceParticipantQuery' => 'PhabricatorOffsetPagedQuery',
'ConpherenceParticipationStatus' => 'ConpherenceConstants',
'ConpherencePeopleWidgetView' => 'ConpherenceWidgetView',
'ConpherencePicCropControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'ConpherenceQueryThreadConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConpherenceConduitAPIMethod',
'ConpherenceQueryTransactionConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConpherenceConduitAPIMethod',
'ConpherenceReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorMailReplyHandler',
'ConpherenceRoomListController' => 'ConpherenceController',
'ConpherenceRoomTestCase' => 'ConpherenceTestCase',
'ConpherenceSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'ConpherenceSettings' => 'ConpherenceConstants',
'ConpherenceTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'ConpherenceThread' => array(
'ConpherenceDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorMentionableInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'ConpherenceThreadIndexer' => 'PhabricatorSearchDocumentIndexer',
'ConpherenceThreadListView' => 'AphrontView',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'ConpherenceThreadMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver',
'ConpherenceThreadMembersPolicyRule' => 'PhabricatorPolicyRule',
'ConpherenceThreadQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'ConpherenceThreadRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'ConpherenceThreadSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'ConpherenceTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'ConpherenceTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'ConpherenceTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'ConpherenceTransactionRenderer' => 'Phobject',
'ConpherenceTransactionView' => 'AphrontView',
'ConpherenceUpdateActions' => 'ConpherenceConstants',
'ConpherenceUpdateController' => 'ConpherenceController',
'ConpherenceUpdateThreadConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConpherenceConduitAPIMethod',
'ConpherenceViewController' => 'ConpherenceController',
Conpherence - make the durable column kind of work and stuff Summary: Ref T7014. This hooks up the durable column such that when you open it up it loads your most recent Conpherence. You can then switch amongst the various widgets and stuff and everything works nicely. Except... - scroll bar does not work - also doesn't work at HEAD when I add a ton of text to the UI with no changes? (wrapped $copy in array_fill(0, 1000, $copy)) - "widget selector" does not collapse when you select something else - this part wasn't really specified so I used the aphlict dropdown stuff. didn't want to keep working on that if this was the wrong UI choice - can not edit title - do we still want that to be done by clicking on the title, which pops a dialogue? - can not add participants or calendar events - what should this UI be? maybe just a button on the top for "participants" and a button on the bottom for calendar? both on top? - this is not pixel perfect to the mock or two I've seen around. Aside from generally being bad at that, I definitely didn't get the name + timestamps formatting correctly, because the standard DOM of that has timestamp FIRST which appears second due to a "float right". Seemed like a lot of special-casing for what might not even be that important in the UI so I punted. (And again, there's likely many unknown ways in which this isn't pixel perfect) There's also code quality issues - `ConpherenceWidgetConfigConstants` is hopefully temporary or at least gets more sleek as we keep progressing here - copied some CSS from main Conpherence app - DOM structure is pretty different - there's some minor CSS tweaks too given the different width (not to mention the DOM structure being different) - copied some JS from behavior-pontificate.js to sync threads relative to aphlict updates - JS in general is like a better version of existing JS; these should collapse I'd hope? - maybe the aphlict-behavior-dropdown change was badsauce? ...but all that said, this definitely feels really nice and I feel like adding stuff is going to be really easy compared to how normal Conpherence is. Also includes a bonus bug fix - we now correctly update participation. The user would encounter this issue if they were in a conpherence that got some updates and then they went to a different page; they would have unread status for the messages that were ajax'd in. This patch fixes that by making sure we mark participation up to date with the proper transaction in all cases. Test Plan: hit "\" to invoke the column and saw nice loading UI and my latest conpherence load. sent messages and verified they received A-OK by looking in DOM console. toggled various widges and verified they rendered correctly. opened up a second browser with a second user on the thread, sent a message, and it was received in a nice asynchronous fashion Reviewers: chad, epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7014 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11968
2015-03-05 19:33:39 +01:00
'ConpherenceWidgetConfigConstants' => 'ConpherenceConstants',
'ConpherenceWidgetController' => 'ConpherenceController',
'ConpherenceWidgetView' => 'AphrontView',
2011-02-03 07:38:42 +01:00
'DarkConsoleController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'DarkConsoleCore' => 'Phobject',
'DarkConsoleDataController' => 'PhabricatorController',
2011-02-02 22:48:52 +01:00
'DarkConsoleErrorLogPlugin' => 'DarkConsolePlugin',
'DarkConsoleErrorLogPluginAPI' => 'Phobject',
'DarkConsoleEventPlugin' => 'DarkConsolePlugin',
'DarkConsoleEventPluginAPI' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
'DarkConsolePlugin' => 'Phobject',
2011-02-02 22:48:52 +01:00
'DarkConsoleRequestPlugin' => 'DarkConsolePlugin',
'DarkConsoleServicesPlugin' => 'DarkConsolePlugin',
'DarkConsoleStartupPlugin' => 'DarkConsolePlugin',
2011-02-02 22:48:52 +01:00
'DarkConsoleXHProfPlugin' => 'DarkConsolePlugin',
'DarkConsoleXHProfPluginAPI' => 'Phobject',
'DefaultDatabaseConfigurationProvider' => array(
'Phobject',
'DatabaseConfigurationProvider',
),
'DifferentialAction' => 'Phobject',
'DifferentialActionEmailCommand' => 'MetaMTAEmailTransactionCommand',
'DifferentialActionMenuEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
2011-01-30 20:02:22 +01:00
'DifferentialAddCommentView' => 'AphrontView',
'DifferentialAdjustmentMapTestCase' => 'PhutilTestCase',
'DifferentialAffectedPath' => 'DifferentialDAO',
'DifferentialApplyPatchField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
'DifferentialAsanaRepresentationField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
'DifferentialAuditorsField' => 'DifferentialStoredCustomField',
'DifferentialAuthorField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
'DifferentialBlameRevisionField' => 'DifferentialStoredCustomField',
'DifferentialBlockHeraldAction' => 'HeraldAction',
'DifferentialBranchField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
'DifferentialChangeHeraldFieldGroup' => 'HeraldFieldGroup',
'DifferentialChangeType' => 'Phobject',
'DifferentialChangesSinceLastUpdateField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
'DifferentialChangeset' => array(
'DifferentialDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
2011-01-24 22:18:41 +01:00
'DifferentialChangesetDetailView' => 'AphrontView',
'DifferentialChangesetFileTreeSideNavBuilder' => 'Phobject',
Implement basic one-up and test renderers Summary: This is a half-step toward one-up and test renderers. This is mostly a structural change, and has no user-facing impact. It splits the rendering hierarchy like this: - Renderer (more methods are abstract than before) - HTML Renderer (most HTML stuff has moved down from the base to here) - HTML 1-up (placeholder only -- not yet a functional implementation) - HTML 2-up (minimal changes, uses mostly old code) - Test Renderer (unit-testable renderer base, implements text versions of the HTML stuff) - Test 1-up (selects 1-up mode for test rendering) - Test 2-up (selects 2-up mode for test rendering) Broadly, I'm trying to share as much code as possible by splitting rendering into more, smaller stages. Specifically, we do this: - Combine the various sorts of inputs (changes, context, inlines, etc.) into a single, relatively homogenous list of "primitives". This happens in the base class. - The primitive types are: old (diff left side), new (diff right side), context ("show more context"), no-context ("context not available") and inline (inline comment). - Possibly, apply a filtering/reordering step to the primitives to get them ready for 1-up rendering. This mostly removes information, and does a small amount of reordering. This also happens in the base class. - Pass the primitives to the actual renderer, to convert them into HTML, text, or whatever else. This happens in the leaf class. The primitive implementation is not yet complete (it doesn't attach as much information to the primitives as it should -- stuff like coverage and copies), but covers the basics. The existing HTMLTwoUp renderer does not use the primitive path; instead, it still goes down the old path. Test Plan: Ran unit tests, looked at a bunch of diffs. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2009 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4421
2013-01-14 23:20:06 +01:00
'DifferentialChangesetHTMLRenderer' => 'DifferentialChangesetRenderer',
'DifferentialChangesetListView' => 'AphrontView',
Implement basic one-up and test renderers Summary: This is a half-step toward one-up and test renderers. This is mostly a structural change, and has no user-facing impact. It splits the rendering hierarchy like this: - Renderer (more methods are abstract than before) - HTML Renderer (most HTML stuff has moved down from the base to here) - HTML 1-up (placeholder only -- not yet a functional implementation) - HTML 2-up (minimal changes, uses mostly old code) - Test Renderer (unit-testable renderer base, implements text versions of the HTML stuff) - Test 1-up (selects 1-up mode for test rendering) - Test 2-up (selects 2-up mode for test rendering) Broadly, I'm trying to share as much code as possible by splitting rendering into more, smaller stages. Specifically, we do this: - Combine the various sorts of inputs (changes, context, inlines, etc.) into a single, relatively homogenous list of "primitives". This happens in the base class. - The primitive types are: old (diff left side), new (diff right side), context ("show more context"), no-context ("context not available") and inline (inline comment). - Possibly, apply a filtering/reordering step to the primitives to get them ready for 1-up rendering. This mostly removes information, and does a small amount of reordering. This also happens in the base class. - Pass the primitives to the actual renderer, to convert them into HTML, text, or whatever else. This happens in the leaf class. The primitive implementation is not yet complete (it doesn't attach as much information to the primitives as it should -- stuff like coverage and copies), but covers the basics. The existing HTMLTwoUp renderer does not use the primitive path; instead, it still goes down the old path. Test Plan: Ran unit tests, looked at a bunch of diffs. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2009 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4421
2013-01-14 23:20:06 +01:00
'DifferentialChangesetOneUpRenderer' => 'DifferentialChangesetHTMLRenderer',
'DifferentialChangesetOneUpTestRenderer' => 'DifferentialChangesetTestRenderer',
'DifferentialChangesetParser' => 'Phobject',
Implement basic one-up and test renderers Summary: This is a half-step toward one-up and test renderers. This is mostly a structural change, and has no user-facing impact. It splits the rendering hierarchy like this: - Renderer (more methods are abstract than before) - HTML Renderer (most HTML stuff has moved down from the base to here) - HTML 1-up (placeholder only -- not yet a functional implementation) - HTML 2-up (minimal changes, uses mostly old code) - Test Renderer (unit-testable renderer base, implements text versions of the HTML stuff) - Test 1-up (selects 1-up mode for test rendering) - Test 2-up (selects 2-up mode for test rendering) Broadly, I'm trying to share as much code as possible by splitting rendering into more, smaller stages. Specifically, we do this: - Combine the various sorts of inputs (changes, context, inlines, etc.) into a single, relatively homogenous list of "primitives". This happens in the base class. - The primitive types are: old (diff left side), new (diff right side), context ("show more context"), no-context ("context not available") and inline (inline comment). - Possibly, apply a filtering/reordering step to the primitives to get them ready for 1-up rendering. This mostly removes information, and does a small amount of reordering. This also happens in the base class. - Pass the primitives to the actual renderer, to convert them into HTML, text, or whatever else. This happens in the leaf class. The primitive implementation is not yet complete (it doesn't attach as much information to the primitives as it should -- stuff like coverage and copies), but covers the basics. The existing HTMLTwoUp renderer does not use the primitive path; instead, it still goes down the old path. Test Plan: Ran unit tests, looked at a bunch of diffs. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2009 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4421
2013-01-14 23:20:06 +01:00
'DifferentialChangesetParserTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'DifferentialChangesetQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'DifferentialChangesetRenderer' => 'Phobject',
Implement basic one-up and test renderers Summary: This is a half-step toward one-up and test renderers. This is mostly a structural change, and has no user-facing impact. It splits the rendering hierarchy like this: - Renderer (more methods are abstract than before) - HTML Renderer (most HTML stuff has moved down from the base to here) - HTML 1-up (placeholder only -- not yet a functional implementation) - HTML 2-up (minimal changes, uses mostly old code) - Test Renderer (unit-testable renderer base, implements text versions of the HTML stuff) - Test 1-up (selects 1-up mode for test rendering) - Test 2-up (selects 2-up mode for test rendering) Broadly, I'm trying to share as much code as possible by splitting rendering into more, smaller stages. Specifically, we do this: - Combine the various sorts of inputs (changes, context, inlines, etc.) into a single, relatively homogenous list of "primitives". This happens in the base class. - The primitive types are: old (diff left side), new (diff right side), context ("show more context"), no-context ("context not available") and inline (inline comment). - Possibly, apply a filtering/reordering step to the primitives to get them ready for 1-up rendering. This mostly removes information, and does a small amount of reordering. This also happens in the base class. - Pass the primitives to the actual renderer, to convert them into HTML, text, or whatever else. This happens in the leaf class. The primitive implementation is not yet complete (it doesn't attach as much information to the primitives as it should -- stuff like coverage and copies), but covers the basics. The existing HTMLTwoUp renderer does not use the primitive path; instead, it still goes down the old path. Test Plan: Ran unit tests, looked at a bunch of diffs. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2009 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4421
2013-01-14 23:20:06 +01:00
'DifferentialChangesetTestRenderer' => 'DifferentialChangesetRenderer',
'DifferentialChangesetTwoUpRenderer' => 'DifferentialChangesetHTMLRenderer',
'DifferentialChangesetTwoUpTestRenderer' => 'DifferentialChangesetTestRenderer',
2011-01-25 00:52:35 +01:00
'DifferentialChangesetViewController' => 'DifferentialController',
'DifferentialCloseConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
2011-02-01 03:05:20 +01:00
'DifferentialCommentPreviewController' => 'DifferentialController',
'DifferentialCommentSaveController' => 'DifferentialController',
'DifferentialCommitMessageParser' => 'Phobject',
'DifferentialCommitMessageParserTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'DifferentialCommitsField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialConflictsField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
2011-01-24 22:18:41 +01:00
'DifferentialController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'DifferentialCoreCustomField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
'DifferentialCreateCommentConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialCreateDiffConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialCreateInlineConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialCreateMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorMailReceiver',
'DifferentialCreateRawDiffConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialCreateRevisionConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialCustomField' => 'PhabricatorCustomField',
'DifferentialCustomFieldDependsOnParser' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldMonogramParser',
'DifferentialCustomFieldDependsOnParserTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'DifferentialCustomFieldNumericIndex' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldNumericIndexStorage',
'DifferentialCustomFieldRevertsParser' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldMonogramParser',
'DifferentialCustomFieldRevertsParserTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'DifferentialCustomFieldStorage' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldStorage',
'DifferentialCustomFieldStringIndex' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldStringIndexStorage',
2011-01-24 20:01:53 +01:00
'DifferentialDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'DifferentialDefaultViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'DifferentialDependenciesField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
'DifferentialDependsOnField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
'DifferentialDiff' => array(
'DifferentialDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'HarbormasterBuildableInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'DifferentialDiffAffectedFilesHeraldField' => 'DifferentialDiffHeraldField',
'DifferentialDiffAuthorHeraldField' => 'DifferentialDiffHeraldField',
'DifferentialDiffAuthorProjectsHeraldField' => 'DifferentialDiffHeraldField',
'DifferentialDiffContentAddedHeraldField' => 'DifferentialDiffHeraldField',
'DifferentialDiffContentHeraldField' => 'DifferentialDiffHeraldField',
'DifferentialDiffContentRemovedHeraldField' => 'DifferentialDiffHeraldField',
'DifferentialDiffCreateController' => 'DifferentialController',
'DifferentialDiffEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'DifferentialDiffHeraldField' => 'HeraldField',
'DifferentialDiffHeraldFieldGroup' => 'HeraldFieldGroup',
'DifferentialDiffInlineCommentQuery' => 'PhabricatorDiffInlineCommentQuery',
'DifferentialDiffPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
2011-01-24 21:07:34 +01:00
'DifferentialDiffProperty' => 'DifferentialDAO',
'DifferentialDiffQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'DifferentialDiffRepositoryHeraldField' => 'DifferentialDiffHeraldField',
'DifferentialDiffRepositoryProjectsHeraldField' => 'DifferentialDiffHeraldField',
'DifferentialDiffTestCase' => 'PhutilTestCase',
'DifferentialDiffTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
Add "Autoplans" to Harbormaster Summary: Ref T8095. Two general problems: - I want Harbormaster to own all lint and unit test results. - I don't want users to have to configure anything for `arc` to keep working automatically. These are in conflict because generic lint/unit test ownership in Harbormaster requires that build targets exist which we can attach build results to. However, we can't currently create build targets on demand: Harbormaster assumes it is responsible for creating targets, then running code or making third-party service calls to actually run the builds. I considered two broad approaches to let `arc` push results into Harbormaster without requiring administrators to configure some kind of "arc results" build plan: # Add magic target PHIDs like `PHID-MAGIC-this-is-really-arc-unit`. # Add new code to build real targets with real PHIDs. (1) is probably a bit less work to get off the ground, but I think it's worse overall and very likely to create more problems in the long run. I particularly worry that it will lead to a small amount of special casing in a very large number of places, which seems more fragile. (2) is more work upfront but I think does a better job of putting all the special casing in one place that we can, e.g., more reasonably unit test, and letting the rest of the code rarely/never care about this case since it's just dealing with normal plans/steps/targets as far as it can tell. This diff introduces "autoplans", which are source templates for plans/steps. This let us "push" these targets into Harbormaster. Hypthetically, any process "like" arc can use autoplans to upload test/lint/etc results. In practice, probably only `arc` will ever use this, but I think it's still quite a bit cleaner than the alternative despite all the generality. Workflow is basically: - `arc` creates a diff. - `arc` calls `harbormaster.queryautotargets`, passing the diff PHID and saying "I have some lint and unit results I want to stick on this thing". - Harbormaster builds the plan, steps, and targets (if any of them don't already exist), and hands back the target PHIDs so `arc` has a completely standard-looking place to put results. - `arc` uploads the test results to the right targets, as though Harbormaster had asked it to run unit/lint in the first place. (This doesn't actually do any of that yet, just sets things up.) I'll maybe doc turn that ^^^^^^ into a doc for posterity since I think it's hard to guess what an "autotarget" is, but I'm going to grab some lunch first. Test Plan: - Added unit tests to make sure we can build these things properly. - Used `harbormaster.queryautotargets` to build autotargets for a bunch of diffs. - Verified targets come up in "waiting for message" state. - Verified plans and steps are not editable. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T8095 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13345
2015-06-21 18:04:21 +02:00
'DifferentialDiffTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
2011-01-24 22:18:41 +01:00
'DifferentialDiffViewController' => 'DifferentialController',
'DifferentialDoorkeeperRevisionFeedStoryPublisher' => 'DoorkeeperFeedStoryPublisher',
'DifferentialDraft' => 'DifferentialDAO',
'DifferentialEditPolicyField' => 'DifferentialCoreCustomField',
'DifferentialFieldParseException' => 'Exception',
'DifferentialFieldValidationException' => 'Exception',
'DifferentialFindConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialGetAllDiffsConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialGetCommitMessageConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialGetCommitPathsConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialGetDiffConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialGetRawDiffConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialGetRevisionCommentsConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialGetRevisionConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialGetWorkingCopy' => 'Phobject',
'DifferentialGitHubLandingStrategy' => 'DifferentialLandingStrategy',
'DifferentialGitSVNIDField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
'DifferentialHarbormasterField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
'DifferentialHiddenComment' => 'DifferentialDAO',
'DifferentialHostField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
'DifferentialHostedGitLandingStrategy' => 'DifferentialLandingStrategy',
'DifferentialHostedMercurialLandingStrategy' => 'DifferentialLandingStrategy',
'DifferentialHovercardEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
'DifferentialHunk' => array(
'DifferentialDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'DifferentialHunkParser' => 'Phobject',
'DifferentialHunkParserTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'DifferentialHunkQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'DifferentialHunkTestCase' => 'PhutilTestCase',
'DifferentialInlineComment' => array(
'Phobject',
'PhabricatorInlineCommentInterface',
),
'DifferentialInlineCommentEditController' => 'PhabricatorInlineCommentController',
'DifferentialInlineCommentPreviewController' => 'PhabricatorInlineCommentPreviewController',
'DifferentialInlineCommentQuery' => 'PhabricatorOffsetPagedQuery',
'DifferentialJIRAIssuesField' => 'DifferentialStoredCustomField',
'DifferentialLandingActionMenuEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
'DifferentialLandingStrategy' => 'Phobject',
'DifferentialLegacyHunk' => 'DifferentialHunk',
'DifferentialLineAdjustmentMap' => 'Phobject',
'DifferentialLintField' => 'DifferentialHarbormasterField',
'DifferentialLintStatus' => 'Phobject',
'DifferentialLocalCommitsView' => 'AphrontView',
'DifferentialManiphestTasksField' => 'DifferentialCoreCustomField',
'DifferentialModernHunk' => 'DifferentialHunk',
'DifferentialNextStepField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
'DifferentialParseCacheGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'DifferentialParseCommitMessageConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
Implement basic one-up and test renderers Summary: This is a half-step toward one-up and test renderers. This is mostly a structural change, and has no user-facing impact. It splits the rendering hierarchy like this: - Renderer (more methods are abstract than before) - HTML Renderer (most HTML stuff has moved down from the base to here) - HTML 1-up (placeholder only -- not yet a functional implementation) - HTML 2-up (minimal changes, uses mostly old code) - Test Renderer (unit-testable renderer base, implements text versions of the HTML stuff) - Test 1-up (selects 1-up mode for test rendering) - Test 2-up (selects 2-up mode for test rendering) Broadly, I'm trying to share as much code as possible by splitting rendering into more, smaller stages. Specifically, we do this: - Combine the various sorts of inputs (changes, context, inlines, etc.) into a single, relatively homogenous list of "primitives". This happens in the base class. - The primitive types are: old (diff left side), new (diff right side), context ("show more context"), no-context ("context not available") and inline (inline comment). - Possibly, apply a filtering/reordering step to the primitives to get them ready for 1-up rendering. This mostly removes information, and does a small amount of reordering. This also happens in the base class. - Pass the primitives to the actual renderer, to convert them into HTML, text, or whatever else. This happens in the leaf class. The primitive implementation is not yet complete (it doesn't attach as much information to the primitives as it should -- stuff like coverage and copies), but covers the basics. The existing HTMLTwoUp renderer does not use the primitive path; instead, it still goes down the old path. Test Plan: Ran unit tests, looked at a bunch of diffs. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2009 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4421
2013-01-14 23:20:06 +01:00
'DifferentialParseRenderTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'DifferentialPathField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
'DifferentialPrimaryPaneView' => 'AphrontView',
'DifferentialProjectReviewersField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
'DifferentialProjectsField' => 'DifferentialCoreCustomField',
'DifferentialQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialQueryDiffsConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialRawDiffRenderer' => 'Phobject',
'DifferentialReleephRequestFieldSpecification' => 'Phobject',
'DifferentialRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'DifferentialReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'DifferentialRepositoryField' => 'DifferentialCoreCustomField',
'DifferentialRepositoryLookup' => 'Phobject',
Allow Herald to "Require legal signatures" for reviews Summary: Ref T3116. Add a Herald action "Require legal signatures" which requires revision authors to accept legal agreements before their revisions can be accepted. - Herald will check which documents the author has signed, and trigger a "you have to sign X, Y, Z" for other documents. - If the author has already signed everything, we don't spam the revision -- basically, this only triggers when signatures are missing. - The UI will show which documents must be signed and warn that the revision can't be accepted until they're completed. - Users aren't allowed to "Accept" the revision until documents are cleared. Fixes T1157. The original install making the request (Hive) no longer uses Phabricator, and this satisfies our requirements. Test Plan: - Added a Herald rule. - Created a revision, saw the rule trigger. - Viewed as author and non-author, saw field UI (generic for non-author, specific for author), transaction UI, and accept-warning UI. - Tried to accept revision. - Signed document, saw UI update. Note that signatures don't currently //push// an update to the revision, but could eventually (like blocking tasks work). - Accepted revision. - Created another revision, saw rules not add the document (since it's already signed, this is the "no spam" case). Reviewers: btrahan, chad Reviewed By: chad Subscribers: asherkin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T1157, T3116 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9771
2014-06-29 16:53:53 +02:00
'DifferentialRequiredSignaturesField' => 'DifferentialCoreCustomField',
'DifferentialRevertPlanField' => 'DifferentialStoredCustomField',
'DifferentialReviewedByField' => 'DifferentialCoreCustomField',
'DifferentialReviewer' => 'Phobject',
'DifferentialReviewerForRevisionEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'DifferentialReviewerStatus' => 'Phobject',
'DifferentialReviewersAddBlockingReviewersHeraldAction' => 'DifferentialReviewersHeraldAction',
'DifferentialReviewersAddBlockingSelfHeraldAction' => 'DifferentialReviewersHeraldAction',
'DifferentialReviewersAddReviewersHeraldAction' => 'DifferentialReviewersHeraldAction',
'DifferentialReviewersAddSelfHeraldAction' => 'DifferentialReviewersHeraldAction',
'DifferentialReviewersField' => 'DifferentialCoreCustomField',
'DifferentialReviewersHeraldAction' => 'HeraldAction',
'DifferentialReviewersView' => 'AphrontView',
'DifferentialRevision' => array(
'DifferentialDAO',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorExtendedPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhrequentTrackableInterface',
'HarbormasterBuildableInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorMentionableInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
),
'DifferentialRevisionAffectedFilesHeraldField' => 'DifferentialRevisionHeraldField',
'DifferentialRevisionAuthorHeraldField' => 'DifferentialRevisionHeraldField',
'DifferentialRevisionAuthorProjectsHeraldField' => 'DifferentialRevisionHeraldField',
'DifferentialRevisionCloseDetailsController' => 'DifferentialController',
'DifferentialRevisionContentAddedHeraldField' => 'DifferentialRevisionHeraldField',
'DifferentialRevisionContentHeraldField' => 'DifferentialRevisionHeraldField',
'DifferentialRevisionContentRemovedHeraldField' => 'DifferentialRevisionHeraldField',
'DifferentialRevisionControlSystem' => 'Phobject',
'DifferentialRevisionDependedOnByRevisionEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'DifferentialRevisionDependsOnRevisionEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
2011-01-27 23:55:52 +01:00
'DifferentialRevisionDetailView' => 'AphrontView',
2011-01-25 22:26:09 +01:00
'DifferentialRevisionEditController' => 'DifferentialController',
'DifferentialRevisionHasCommitEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'DifferentialRevisionHasReviewerEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'DifferentialRevisionHasTaskEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'DifferentialRevisionHeraldField' => 'HeraldField',
'DifferentialRevisionHeraldFieldGroup' => 'HeraldFieldGroup',
'DifferentialRevisionIDField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
'DifferentialRevisionLandController' => 'DifferentialController',
'DifferentialRevisionListController' => 'DifferentialController',
'DifferentialRevisionListView' => 'AphrontView',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'DifferentialRevisionMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver',
'DifferentialRevisionOperationController' => 'DifferentialController',
'DifferentialRevisionPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'DifferentialRevisionPackageHeraldField' => 'DifferentialRevisionHeraldField',
'DifferentialRevisionPackageOwnerHeraldField' => 'DifferentialRevisionHeraldField',
[Rough Sketch] Differential ObjectItemView Smexyness Summary: Tried out `PhabricatorObjectItemView` for Differential. It looks smexy and smooth. Refs T2014 - Title and Date as Maniphest - Author in the handle icon - Bar color reflects revision status (Needs Review, Accepted, Abandoned etc.) @chad looking for non-blue is faster than keeping watch for everything that's not "Closed" in old table form - Some status information are in footer icons; currently only stale/old status display as well as saved drafts, maybe more in future; these come into my mind: - No reviewer warning - Push Blocking Priority (T2730) - Trivial, fast review guaranteed - Sketch / Just looking for advice/help - Arcanist Project (T2614) - Denote "Public Send-in" (T1476) {F37662} {F37663} {F37664} {F37665} Some flaws: - Date and reviewers on every entry the same? - No respect for Differential fields (for some reason, every entry appeared the same, so broke it to parts) - Plenty of (potential) increase in height - advise reducing paging length from 100 to 50 - or just ignore me Suggestions for the future: - Expand the meta information regarding revisions; e.g. the various status displays above - Uh... T2543, T1279, T793, T731 and what else I want for Differential, because they are awesome! - T793 should be in particular easy appearance-wise, just copy-paste from Maniphest Test Plan: By looking at it, of course. Verified there are no errors or crashed Reviewers: epriestley, chad, btrahan, liguobig Reviewed By: chad CC: aran, Korvin, edward, nh Maniphest Tasks: T2014 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5451 Conflicts: src/__celerity_resource_map__.php
2013-07-02 21:14:33 +02:00
'DifferentialRevisionQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'DifferentialRevisionRepositoryHeraldField' => 'DifferentialRevisionHeraldField',
'DifferentialRevisionRepositoryProjectsHeraldField' => 'DifferentialRevisionHeraldField',
'DifferentialRevisionReviewersHeraldField' => 'DifferentialRevisionHeraldField',
Use ApplicationSearch in Differential Summary: Ref T603. Ref T2625. Fixes T3241. Depends on D5451. Depends on D6346. @wez, this changes the Differential revision list UI substantially and may generate a lot of bikeshedding / who-moved-my-cheese churn. See T3417 for context, for example. The motivations for this change are: - The list now works on devices, like phones and tablets. This is a requirement to make the rest of Differential work on devices. - Although ApplicationSearch intentionally presents a simpler interface initially and some options which were one click away before aren't now, it is much more powerful than the search it replaces and allows users to build, save, share, fork, edit, and customize a much wider range of queries. Users who used the old filters frequently can use Advanced Search -> Save Custom Query to create new versions of them, and of any other query. "Edit Queries.." allows users to remove and reorder queries, including builtin queries. Basically, there are like three things which have gone from "1-click" to "a few clicks", and ten trillion things which have gone from "hard/impossible" to "relatively easy". The local screenshots look a bit iffy, but I think a lot of this is the fakenesss of my test data. If they still feel iffy in production we can tweak them until they feel good, like we did for Maniphest. Test Plan: {F48477} {F48478} Reviewers: btrahan, chad, wez Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, s Maniphest Tasks: T603, T2625, T3241 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6347
2013-07-03 15:11:07 +02:00
'DifferentialRevisionSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'DifferentialRevisionStatus' => 'Phobject',
'DifferentialRevisionSummaryHeraldField' => 'DifferentialRevisionHeraldField',
'DifferentialRevisionTitleHeraldField' => 'DifferentialRevisionHeraldField',
2011-01-27 23:55:52 +01:00
'DifferentialRevisionUpdateHistoryView' => 'AphrontView',
'DifferentialRevisionViewController' => 'DifferentialController',
'DifferentialSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
Improve Search architecture Summary: The search indexing API has several problems right now: - Always runs in-process. - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it. - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster. - Instead, make the API phid-oriented. - No uniform indexing API. - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird. - Instead, provide a uniform API. - No uniform CLI. - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers. - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing. - Not application-oriented. - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world. - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader. Test Plan: - `bin/search index` - Indexed one revision, one task. - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types. - Indexed `--all`. - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it. - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing. - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing. - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: 20after4, aran Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 23:21:31 +01:00
'DifferentialSearchIndexer' => 'PhabricatorSearchDocumentIndexer',
'DifferentialSetDiffPropertyConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialStoredCustomField' => 'DifferentialCustomField',
'DifferentialSubscribersField' => 'DifferentialCoreCustomField',
'DifferentialSummaryField' => 'DifferentialCoreCustomField',
'DifferentialTestPlanField' => 'DifferentialCoreCustomField',
'DifferentialTitleField' => 'DifferentialCoreCustomField',
'DifferentialTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'DifferentialTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'DifferentialTransactionEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
Migrate Differential comments to ApplicationTransactions Summary: Ref T2222. This is the big one. This migrates each `DifferentialComment` to one or more ApplicationTransactions (action, cc, reviewers, update, comment, inlines), and makes `DifferentialComment` a double-reader for ApplicationTransactions. The migration is pretty straightforward: - If a comment took an action not otherwise covered, it gets an "action" transaction. This is something like "epriestley abandoned this revision.". - If a comment updated the diff, it gets an "updated diff" transaction. Very old transactions of this type may not have a diff ID (probably only at Facebook). - If a comment added or removed reviewers, it gets a "changed reviewers" transaction. - If a comment added CCs, it gets a "subscribers" transaction. - If a comment added comment text, it gets a "comment" transaction. - For each inline attached to a comment, we generate an "inline" transaction. Most comments generate a small number of transactions, but a few generate a significant number. At HEAD, the code is basically already doing this, so comments in the last day or two already obey these rules, roughly, and will all generate only one transaction (except inlines). Because we've already preallocated PHIDs in the comment text table, we only need to write to the transaction table. NOTE: This significantly degrades Differential, making inline comments pretty much useless (they each get their own transaction, and don't show line numbers or files). The data is all fine, but the UI is garbage now. This needs to be fixed before we can deploy this to users, but it's easily separable since it's all just display code. Specifically, they look like this: {F112270} Test Plan: I've migrated locally and put things through their paces, but it's hard to catch sketchy stuff locally because most of my test data is nonsense and bad migrations wouldn't necessarily look out of place. IMPORTANT: I'm planning to push this to a branch and then shift production over to the branch, and run it for a day or two before bringing it to master. I generally feel good about this change: it's not that big since we were able to separate a lot of pieces out of it, and it's pretty straightforward. That said, it's still one of the most scary/dangerous changes we've ever made. Reviewers: btrahan CC: chad, aran Maniphest Tasks: T2222 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8210
2014-02-12 00:36:58 +01:00
'DifferentialTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'DifferentialTransactionView' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionView',
'DifferentialUnitField' => 'DifferentialHarbormasterField',
'DifferentialUnitStatus' => 'Phobject',
'DifferentialUnitTestResult' => 'Phobject',
'DifferentialUpdateRevisionConduitAPIMethod' => 'DifferentialConduitAPIMethod',
'DifferentialViewPolicyField' => 'DifferentialCoreCustomField',
'DiffusionAuditorDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'DiffusionAuditorFunctionDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'DiffusionAuditorsAddAuditorsHeraldAction' => 'DiffusionAuditorsHeraldAction',
'DiffusionAuditorsAddSelfHeraldAction' => 'DiffusionAuditorsHeraldAction',
'DiffusionAuditorsHeraldAction' => 'HeraldAction',
'DiffusionBlockHeraldAction' => 'HeraldAction',
'DiffusionBranchQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionBranchTableController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionBranchTableView' => 'DiffusionView',
'DiffusionBrowseController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionBrowseDirectoryController' => 'DiffusionBrowseController',
'DiffusionBrowseFileController' => 'DiffusionBrowseController',
'DiffusionBrowseMainController' => 'DiffusionBrowseController',
'DiffusionBrowseQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionBrowseResultSet' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionBrowseSearchController' => 'DiffusionBrowseController',
'DiffusionBrowseTableView' => 'DiffusionView',
'DiffusionCachedResolveRefsQuery' => 'DiffusionLowLevelQuery',
2011-03-14 06:03:30 +01:00
'DiffusionChangeController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionChangeHeraldFieldGroup' => 'HeraldFieldGroup',
'DiffusionCommitAffectedFilesHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitAuthorHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitAutocloseHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitBranchesController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionCommitBranchesHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitCommitterHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionCommitDiffContentAddedHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitDiffContentHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitDiffContentRemovedHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitDiffEnormousHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitEditController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionCommitHasRevisionEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'DiffusionCommitHasTaskEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'DiffusionCommitHash' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionCommitHeraldField' => 'HeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitHeraldFieldGroup' => 'HeraldFieldGroup',
'DiffusionCommitHookEngine' => 'Phobject',
Reject dangerous changes in Git repositories by default Summary: Ref T4189. This adds a per-repository "dangerous changes" flag, which defaults to off. This flag must be enabled to do non-appending branch mutation (delete branches / rewrite history). Test Plan: With flag on and off, performed various safe and dangerous pushes. >>> orbital ~/repos/POEMS $ git push origin :blarp remote: +---------------------------------------------------------------+ remote: | * * * PUSH REJECTED BY EVIL DRAGON BUREAUCRATS * * * | remote: +---------------------------------------------------------------+ remote: \ remote: \ ^ /^ remote: \ / \ // \ remote: \ |\___/| / \// .\ remote: \ /V V \__ / // | \ \ *----* remote: / / \/_/ // | \ \ \ | remote: @___@` \/_ // | \ \ \/\ \ remote: 0/0/| \/_ // | \ \ \ \ remote: 0/0/0/0/| \/// | \ \ | | remote: 0/0/0/0/0/_|_ / ( // | \ _\ | / remote: 0/0/0/0/0/0/`/,_ _ _/ ) ; -. | _ _\.-~ / / remote: ,-} _ *-.|.-~-. .~ ~ remote: \ \__/ `/\ / ~-. _ .-~ / remote: \____(Oo) *. } { / remote: ( (--) .----~-.\ \-` .~ remote: //__\\ \ DENIED! ///.----..< \ _ -~ remote: // \\ ///-._ _ _ _ _ _ _{^ - - - - ~ remote: remote: remote: DANGEROUS CHANGE: The change you're attempting to push deletes the branch 'blarp'. remote: Dangerous change protection is enabled for this repository. remote: Edit the repository configuration before making dangerous changes. remote: To ssh://dweller@localhost/diffusion/POEMS/ ! [remote rejected] blarp (pre-receive hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://dweller@localhost/diffusion/POEMS/' Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, chad, richardvanvelzen Maniphest Tasks: T4189 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7689
2013-12-03 19:28:39 +01:00
'DiffusionCommitHookRejectException' => 'Exception',
'DiffusionCommitMergeHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitMessageHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitPackageAuditHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitPackageHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitPackageOwnerHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitParentsQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionCommitQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'DiffusionCommitRef' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionCommitRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'DiffusionCommitRemarkupRuleTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'DiffusionCommitRepositoryHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitRepositoryProjectsHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitRevertedByCommitEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'DiffusionCommitRevertsCommitEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'DiffusionCommitReviewerHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitRevisionAcceptedHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitRevisionHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitRevisionReviewersHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitRevisionSubscribersHeraldField' => 'DiffusionCommitHeraldField',
'DiffusionCommitTagsController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'DiffusionCreateCommentConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionCreateRepositoriesCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'DiffusionDefaultEditCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'DiffusionDefaultPushCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'DiffusionDefaultViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
2011-03-31 02:36:16 +02:00
'DiffusionDiffController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionDiffInlineCommentQuery' => 'PhabricatorDiffInlineCommentQuery',
'DiffusionDiffQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionDoorkeeperCommitFeedStoryPublisher' => 'DoorkeeperFeedStoryPublisher',
'DiffusionEmptyResultView' => 'DiffusionView',
'DiffusionExistsQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionExternalController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionExternalSymbolQuery' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionExternalSymbolsSource' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionFileContent' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionFileContentQuery' => 'DiffusionQuery',
'DiffusionFileContentQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionFindSymbolsConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionGetCommitsConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionGetLintMessagesConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionGetRecentCommitsByPathConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionGitBranch' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionGitBranchTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'DiffusionGitFileContentQuery' => 'DiffusionFileContentQuery',
'DiffusionGitFileContentQueryTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'DiffusionGitRawDiffQuery' => 'DiffusionRawDiffQuery',
'DiffusionGitReceivePackSSHWorkflow' => 'DiffusionGitSSHWorkflow',
'DiffusionGitRequest' => 'DiffusionRequest',
'DiffusionGitResponse' => 'AphrontResponse',
'DiffusionGitSSHWorkflow' => 'DiffusionSSHWorkflow',
'DiffusionGitUploadPackSSHWorkflow' => 'DiffusionGitSSHWorkflow',
'DiffusionHistoryController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionHistoryQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionHistoryTableView' => 'DiffusionView',
'DiffusionHovercardEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
'DiffusionInlineCommentController' => 'PhabricatorInlineCommentController',
'DiffusionInlineCommentPreviewController' => 'PhabricatorInlineCommentPreviewController',
'DiffusionLastModifiedController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionLastModifiedQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionLintController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionLintCountQuery' => 'PhabricatorQuery',
'DiffusionLintDetailsController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionLintSaveRunner' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionLookSoonConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionLowLevelCommitFieldsQuery' => 'DiffusionLowLevelQuery',
'DiffusionLowLevelCommitQuery' => 'DiffusionLowLevelQuery',
'DiffusionLowLevelGitRefQuery' => 'DiffusionLowLevelQuery',
'DiffusionLowLevelMercurialBranchesQuery' => 'DiffusionLowLevelQuery',
'DiffusionLowLevelMercurialPathsQuery' => 'DiffusionLowLevelQuery',
Conditionally use `hg files` vs. `hg locate` depending on version of Mercurial Summary: In Mercurial 3.2 the `locate` command was deprecated in favor of `files` command. This change updates the DiffusionLowLevelMercurialPathsQuery command to conditionally use `locate` or `files` based on the version of Mercurial used. Closes T7375 Test Plan: My test/develop Phabricator instance is setup to run Mercurial 3.5.1. The test procedure to verify valid file listings are being returned: 1. I navigated to `http://192.168.0.133/conduit/method/diffusion.querypaths/` 2. I populated the following fields: - path: `"/"` - commit: `"d721d5b57fc9ef72e47ff9d4e0c583d74a46590c"` - callsign: `"HGTEST"` 3. I submitted request and verified that result contained all files in the repository: ``` { "0": "README", "1": "alpha/beta/trifle", "2": "test/Chupacabra.cow", "3": "test/socket.ks" } ``` I repeated the above steps after setting up Mercurial 2.6.2, which I installed in the following manner: 1. I downloaded Mercurial 2.6.2 source and run `make local` which will only compile it to work from its own directory (`/opt/mercurial-2.6.2`) 2. I linked `/usr/local/bin/hg -> /opt/mercurial-2.6.2/hg` (there's also a `/usr/bin/hg` which is a link to `/usr/local/bin/hg`) 3. I navigated to my home directory and verify that `hg --version` returns 2.6.2. 4. I restarted phabricator services (probably unnecessary). With the Multimeter application active 1. I verified that `/usr/local/bin/hg` referred to version 2.6 2. I ran the same conduit call from the conduit application 3. I verified that `http://192.168.0.133/multimeter/?type=2&group=label` incremented values for `bin.hg locate`. 4. I swapped out mercurial versions for 3.5.1 5. I ran the same conduit call from the conduit application 6. I verified that `http://192.168.0.133/multimeter/?type=2&group=label` incremented values for `bin.hg files` Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers Subscribers: Korvin Maniphest Tasks: T7375 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14253
2015-10-13 02:50:26 +02:00
'DiffusionLowLevelMercurialPathsQueryTests' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'DiffusionLowLevelParentsQuery' => 'DiffusionLowLevelQuery',
'DiffusionLowLevelQuery' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionLowLevelResolveRefsQuery' => 'DiffusionLowLevelQuery',
'DiffusionMercurialFileContentQuery' => 'DiffusionFileContentQuery',
'DiffusionMercurialRawDiffQuery' => 'DiffusionRawDiffQuery',
'DiffusionMercurialRequest' => 'DiffusionRequest',
'DiffusionMercurialResponse' => 'AphrontResponse',
'DiffusionMercurialSSHWorkflow' => 'DiffusionSSHWorkflow',
'DiffusionMercurialServeSSHWorkflow' => 'DiffusionMercurialSSHWorkflow',
'DiffusionMercurialWireClientSSHProtocolChannel' => 'PhutilProtocolChannel',
'DiffusionMercurialWireProtocol' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionMercurialWireProtocolTests' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'DiffusionMercurialWireSSHTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'DiffusionMergedCommitsQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionMirrorDeleteController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionMirrorEditController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionPathChange' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionPathChangeQuery' => 'Phobject',
2011-04-04 04:20:47 +02:00
'DiffusionPathCompleteController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionPathIDQuery' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionPathQuery' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionPathQueryTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'DiffusionPathTreeController' => 'DiffusionController',
2011-04-04 04:20:47 +02:00
'DiffusionPathValidateController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionPhpExternalSymbolsSource' => 'DiffusionExternalSymbolsSource',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentAffectedFilesHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentAuthorHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentAuthorRawHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentBranchesHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentCommitterHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentCommitterRawHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentDiffContentAddedHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentDiffContentHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentDiffContentRemovedHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentDiffEnormousHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField' => 'HeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentMergeHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentMessageHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentPusherHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentPusherIsCommitterHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentPusherProjectsHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentRepositoryHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentRepositoryProjectsHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentRevisionAcceptedHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentRevisionHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentRevisionReviewersHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitContentRevisionSubscribersHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitContentHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefChangeHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitRefHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefHeraldField' => 'HeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefHeraldFieldGroup' => 'HeraldFieldGroup',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefNameHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitRefHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefPusherHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitRefHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefPusherProjectsHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitRefHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefRepositoryHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitRefHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefRepositoryProjectsHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitRefHeraldField',
'DiffusionPreCommitRefTypeHeraldField' => 'DiffusionPreCommitRefHeraldField',
'DiffusionPushCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'DiffusionPushEventViewController' => 'DiffusionPushLogController',
'DiffusionPushLogController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionPushLogListController' => 'DiffusionPushLogController',
'DiffusionPushLogListView' => 'AphrontView',
'DiffusionPythonExternalSymbolsSource' => 'DiffusionExternalSymbolsSource',
'DiffusionQuery' => 'PhabricatorQuery',
'DiffusionQueryCommitsConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionQueryPathsConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionRawDiffQuery' => 'DiffusionQuery',
'DiffusionRawDiffQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionReadmeView' => 'DiffusionView',
'DiffusionRefDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'DiffusionRefNotFoundException' => 'Exception',
'DiffusionRefTableController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionRefsQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionRenameHistoryQuery' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionRepositoryByIDRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'DiffusionRepositoryController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionRepositoryCreateController' => 'DiffusionRepositoryEditController',
'DiffusionRepositoryDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'DiffusionRepositoryDefaultController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditActionsController' => 'DiffusionRepositoryEditController',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditActivateController' => 'DiffusionRepositoryEditController',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditAutomationController' => 'DiffusionRepositoryEditController',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditBasicController' => 'DiffusionRepositoryEditController',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditBranchesController' => 'DiffusionRepositoryEditController',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditController' => 'DiffusionController',
Reject dangerous changes in Git repositories by default Summary: Ref T4189. This adds a per-repository "dangerous changes" flag, which defaults to off. This flag must be enabled to do non-appending branch mutation (delete branches / rewrite history). Test Plan: With flag on and off, performed various safe and dangerous pushes. >>> orbital ~/repos/POEMS $ git push origin :blarp remote: +---------------------------------------------------------------+ remote: | * * * PUSH REJECTED BY EVIL DRAGON BUREAUCRATS * * * | remote: +---------------------------------------------------------------+ remote: \ remote: \ ^ /^ remote: \ / \ // \ remote: \ |\___/| / \// .\ remote: \ /V V \__ / // | \ \ *----* remote: / / \/_/ // | \ \ \ | remote: @___@` \/_ // | \ \ \/\ \ remote: 0/0/| \/_ // | \ \ \ \ remote: 0/0/0/0/| \/// | \ \ | | remote: 0/0/0/0/0/_|_ / ( // | \ _\ | / remote: 0/0/0/0/0/0/`/,_ _ _/ ) ; -. | _ _\.-~ / / remote: ,-} _ *-.|.-~-. .~ ~ remote: \ \__/ `/\ / ~-. _ .-~ / remote: \____(Oo) *. } { / remote: ( (--) .----~-.\ \-` .~ remote: //__\\ \ DENIED! ///.----..< \ _ -~ remote: // \\ ///-._ _ _ _ _ _ _{^ - - - - ~ remote: remote: remote: DANGEROUS CHANGE: The change you're attempting to push deletes the branch 'blarp'. remote: Dangerous change protection is enabled for this repository. remote: Edit the repository configuration before making dangerous changes. remote: To ssh://dweller@localhost/diffusion/POEMS/ ! [remote rejected] blarp (pre-receive hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://dweller@localhost/diffusion/POEMS/' Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, chad, richardvanvelzen Maniphest Tasks: T4189 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7689
2013-12-03 19:28:39 +01:00
'DiffusionRepositoryEditDangerousController' => 'DiffusionRepositoryEditController',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditDeleteController' => 'DiffusionRepositoryEditController',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditEncodingController' => 'DiffusionRepositoryEditController',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditHostingController' => 'DiffusionRepositoryEditController',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditMainController' => 'DiffusionRepositoryEditController',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditStagingController' => 'DiffusionRepositoryEditController',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditStorageController' => 'DiffusionRepositoryEditController',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditSubversionController' => 'DiffusionRepositoryEditController',
'DiffusionRepositoryEditUpdateController' => 'DiffusionRepositoryEditController',
'DiffusionRepositoryListController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionRepositoryNewController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionRepositoryPath' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionRepositoryRef' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionRepositoryRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'DiffusionRepositorySymbolsController' => 'DiffusionRepositoryEditController',
'DiffusionRepositoryTag' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionRepositoryTestAutomationController' => 'DiffusionRepositoryEditController',
'DiffusionRequest' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionResolveRefsConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod',
Provide a standalone query for resolution of commit author/committer into Phabricator users Summary: Ref T4195. To implement the "Author" and "Committer" rules, I need to resolve author/committer strings into Phabricator users. The code to do this is currently buried in the daemons. Extract it into a standalone query. I also added `bin/repository lookup-users <commit>` to test this query, both to improve confidence I'm getting this right and to provide a diagnostic command for users, since there's occasionally some confusion over how author/committer strings resolve into valid users. Test Plan: I tested this using `bin/repository lookup-users` and `reparse.php --message` on Git, Mercurial and SVN commits. Here's the `lookup-users` output: >>> orbital ~/devtools/phabricator $ ./bin/repository lookup-users rINIS3 Examining commit rINIS3... Raw author string: epriestley Phabricator user: epriestley (Evan Priestley ) Raw committer string: null >>> orbital ~/devtools/phabricator $ ./bin/repository lookup-users rPOEMS165b6c54f487c8 Examining commit rPOEMS165b6c54f487... Raw author string: epriestley <git@epriestley.com> Phabricator user: epriestley (Evan Priestley ) Raw committer string: epriestley <git@epriestley.com> Phabricator user: epriestley (Evan Priestley ) >>> orbital ~/devtools/phabricator $ ./bin/repository lookup-users rINIH6d24c1aee7741e Examining commit rINIH6d24c1aee774... Raw author string: epriestley <hg@yghe.net> Phabricator user: epriestley (Evan Priestley ) Raw committer string: null >>> orbital ~/devtools/phabricator $ The `reparse.php` output was similar, and all VCSes resolved authors correctly. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1731, T4195 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7801
2013-12-19 20:05:17 +01:00
'DiffusionResolveUserQuery' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionSSHWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorSSHWorkflow',
'DiffusionSearchQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionServeController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionSetPasswordSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'DiffusionSetupException' => 'Exception',
'DiffusionSubversionSSHWorkflow' => 'DiffusionSSHWorkflow',
'DiffusionSubversionServeSSHWorkflow' => 'DiffusionSubversionSSHWorkflow',
'DiffusionSubversionWireProtocol' => 'Phobject',
'DiffusionSubversionWireProtocolTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
2011-03-14 06:03:30 +01:00
'DiffusionSvnFileContentQuery' => 'DiffusionFileContentQuery',
'DiffusionSvnRawDiffQuery' => 'DiffusionRawDiffQuery',
'DiffusionSvnRequest' => 'DiffusionRequest',
'DiffusionSymbolController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionSymbolDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'DiffusionSymbolQuery' => 'PhabricatorOffsetPagedQuery',
'DiffusionTagListController' => 'DiffusionController',
'DiffusionTagListView' => 'DiffusionView',
'DiffusionTagsQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionQueryConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionURITestCase' => 'PhutilTestCase',
'DiffusionUpdateCoverageConduitAPIMethod' => 'DiffusionConduitAPIMethod',
'DiffusionView' => 'AphrontView',
Port Diviner Core to Phabricator Summary: This implements most/all of the difficult parts of Diviner on top of Phabricator instead of as standalone components. See T988. In particular, here are the things I want to fix: **Performance** The Diviner parser works in two stages. The first stage breaks source files into "Atoms". The second stage renders atoms into a display format (e.g., HTML). Diviner currently has a good caching story on the first step of the pipeline, but zero caching in the second step. This means it's very slow, even for a fairly small project like Phabricator. We must re-render every piece of documentation every time, instead of only changed documentation. Most of this diff concerns itself with addressing this problem. There's a fairly large explanatory comment about it, but the trickiest part is that when an atom changes, other atoms (defined in other places) may also change -- for example, if `class B extends A`, editing A should dirty B, even if B is in an entirely different file. We perform analysis in two stages to propagate these changes: first detecting direct changes, then detecting indirect changes. This isn't completely implemented -- we need to propagate 'extends' through more levels -- but I believe it's structurally correct and good enough until we actually document classes. **Inheritance** Diviner currently has a very weak story on inheritance. I want to inherit a lot more metas/docs. If an interface documents a method, we should just pull that documentation in to every implementation by default (implementations can still override it if they want). It can be shown in grey or something, but it should be desirable and correct to omit documentation of a method implementation when you are implementing a parent. Similarly, I want to pull in inherited methods and @tasks and such. This diff sets up for that, by formalizing "extends" relationships between atoms. **Overspecialization** Diviner currently specializes atoms (FileAtom, FunctionAtom, ClassAtom, etc.). This is pretty much not useful, because Atomizers (which produce the atoms) need to be highly specialized, and Renderers/Publishers (which consume the atoms) also need to be highly specialized. Nothing interesting actually lives in the atom specializations, and we don't benefit from having them -- it just costs us generality in storage/caches for them. In the new code, I've used a single Atom class to represent any type of atom. **URIs** We have fairly hideous URIs right now, which are very cumbersome For in-app doc links, I want to provide nice URIs ("/h/notfications" or similar) which are stable redirects, and probably add remarkup for it: !{notifications} or similar. This diff isn't related to that since it's too premature. **Search** Once we have a database generation target, we can index the documentation. **Design** Chad has some nice mocks. Test Plan: Ran `bin/diviner generate`, `bin/diviner generate --clean`. Saw appropriate graph propagation after edits. This diff doesn't do anything very useful yet. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T988 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4340
2013-01-07 23:04:23 +01:00
'DivinerArticleAtomizer' => 'DivinerAtomizer',
'DivinerAtom' => 'Phobject',
'DivinerAtomCache' => 'DivinerDiskCache',
'DivinerAtomController' => 'DivinerController',
'DivinerAtomListController' => 'DivinerController',
'DivinerAtomPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'DivinerAtomQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'DivinerAtomRef' => 'Phobject',
'DivinerAtomSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'DivinerAtomSearchIndexer' => 'PhabricatorSearchDocumentIndexer',
Port Diviner Core to Phabricator Summary: This implements most/all of the difficult parts of Diviner on top of Phabricator instead of as standalone components. See T988. In particular, here are the things I want to fix: **Performance** The Diviner parser works in two stages. The first stage breaks source files into "Atoms". The second stage renders atoms into a display format (e.g., HTML). Diviner currently has a good caching story on the first step of the pipeline, but zero caching in the second step. This means it's very slow, even for a fairly small project like Phabricator. We must re-render every piece of documentation every time, instead of only changed documentation. Most of this diff concerns itself with addressing this problem. There's a fairly large explanatory comment about it, but the trickiest part is that when an atom changes, other atoms (defined in other places) may also change -- for example, if `class B extends A`, editing A should dirty B, even if B is in an entirely different file. We perform analysis in two stages to propagate these changes: first detecting direct changes, then detecting indirect changes. This isn't completely implemented -- we need to propagate 'extends' through more levels -- but I believe it's structurally correct and good enough until we actually document classes. **Inheritance** Diviner currently has a very weak story on inheritance. I want to inherit a lot more metas/docs. If an interface documents a method, we should just pull that documentation in to every implementation by default (implementations can still override it if they want). It can be shown in grey or something, but it should be desirable and correct to omit documentation of a method implementation when you are implementing a parent. Similarly, I want to pull in inherited methods and @tasks and such. This diff sets up for that, by formalizing "extends" relationships between atoms. **Overspecialization** Diviner currently specializes atoms (FileAtom, FunctionAtom, ClassAtom, etc.). This is pretty much not useful, because Atomizers (which produce the atoms) need to be highly specialized, and Renderers/Publishers (which consume the atoms) also need to be highly specialized. Nothing interesting actually lives in the atom specializations, and we don't benefit from having them -- it just costs us generality in storage/caches for them. In the new code, I've used a single Atom class to represent any type of atom. **URIs** We have fairly hideous URIs right now, which are very cumbersome For in-app doc links, I want to provide nice URIs ("/h/notfications" or similar) which are stable redirects, and probably add remarkup for it: !{notifications} or similar. This diff isn't related to that since it's too premature. **Search** Once we have a database generation target, we can index the documentation. **Design** Chad has some nice mocks. Test Plan: Ran `bin/diviner generate`, `bin/diviner generate --clean`. Saw appropriate graph propagation after edits. This diff doesn't do anything very useful yet. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T988 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4340
2013-01-07 23:04:23 +01:00
'DivinerAtomizeWorkflow' => 'DivinerWorkflow',
'DivinerAtomizer' => 'Phobject',
'DivinerBookController' => 'DivinerController',
'DivinerBookDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'DivinerBookEditController' => 'DivinerController',
'DivinerBookItemView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'DivinerBookPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'DivinerBookQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'DivinerBookSearchIndexer' => 'PhabricatorSearchDocumentIndexer',
'DivinerController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'DivinerDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'DivinerDefaultEditCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
Move Diviner further toward usability Summary: - Complete the "project" -> "book" stuff. This is cleaner conceptually and keeps us from having yet another meaning for the word "project". - Normalize symbols during atomization. This simplifies publishing a great deal, and allows static documentation to link to dynamic documentation and vice versa, because the canonical names of symbols are agreed upon (we can tweak the actual algorithm). - Give articles a specifiable name distinct from the title, and default to something like "support" instead of "Get Help! Get Support!" so URIs end up more readable (not "Get_Help!_Get_Support!"). - Have the atomizers set book information on atoms. - Implement very basic publishers. Publishers are basically glue code between the atomization process and the rendering process -- the two we'll have initially are "static" (publish to files on disk) and "phabricator" (or similar -- publish into the database). - Handle duplicate symbol definitions in the atomize and publish pipelines. This fixes the issue where a project defines two functions named "idx()" and we currently tell them not to do that and break. Realistically, this is common in the real world and we should just roll our eyes and do the legwork to generate documentation as best we can. - Particularly, dirty all atoms with the same name as a dirty atom (e.g., if 'function f()' is updated, regnerate the documentation for all functions named f() in the book). - When publishing, we publish these at "function/f/@1", "function/f/@2". The base page will offer to disambiguate ("There are 8 functions named 'f' in this codebase, which one do you want?"). - Implement a very very basic renderer. This generates the actual HTML (or text, or XML, or whatever else) for the documentation, which the publisher dumps onto disk or into a database or whatever. - The atomize workflow actually needs to depend on books, at least sort of, so make it load config and use it properly. - Propagate multilevel dirties through the graph. If "C extends B" and "B extends A", we should regenerate C when A changes. Prior to this diff, we would regnerate B only. Test Plan: Generated some documentation. Named two articles "feedback", generated docs, saw "article/feedback/@1/" and "article/feedback/@2/" created. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, chad Reviewed By: chad CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T988 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4896
2013-02-18 00:39:36 +01:00
'DivinerDefaultRenderer' => 'DivinerRenderer',
'DivinerDefaultViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'DivinerDiskCache' => 'Phobject',
Port Diviner Core to Phabricator Summary: This implements most/all of the difficult parts of Diviner on top of Phabricator instead of as standalone components. See T988. In particular, here are the things I want to fix: **Performance** The Diviner parser works in two stages. The first stage breaks source files into "Atoms". The second stage renders atoms into a display format (e.g., HTML). Diviner currently has a good caching story on the first step of the pipeline, but zero caching in the second step. This means it's very slow, even for a fairly small project like Phabricator. We must re-render every piece of documentation every time, instead of only changed documentation. Most of this diff concerns itself with addressing this problem. There's a fairly large explanatory comment about it, but the trickiest part is that when an atom changes, other atoms (defined in other places) may also change -- for example, if `class B extends A`, editing A should dirty B, even if B is in an entirely different file. We perform analysis in two stages to propagate these changes: first detecting direct changes, then detecting indirect changes. This isn't completely implemented -- we need to propagate 'extends' through more levels -- but I believe it's structurally correct and good enough until we actually document classes. **Inheritance** Diviner currently has a very weak story on inheritance. I want to inherit a lot more metas/docs. If an interface documents a method, we should just pull that documentation in to every implementation by default (implementations can still override it if they want). It can be shown in grey or something, but it should be desirable and correct to omit documentation of a method implementation when you are implementing a parent. Similarly, I want to pull in inherited methods and @tasks and such. This diff sets up for that, by formalizing "extends" relationships between atoms. **Overspecialization** Diviner currently specializes atoms (FileAtom, FunctionAtom, ClassAtom, etc.). This is pretty much not useful, because Atomizers (which produce the atoms) need to be highly specialized, and Renderers/Publishers (which consume the atoms) also need to be highly specialized. Nothing interesting actually lives in the atom specializations, and we don't benefit from having them -- it just costs us generality in storage/caches for them. In the new code, I've used a single Atom class to represent any type of atom. **URIs** We have fairly hideous URIs right now, which are very cumbersome For in-app doc links, I want to provide nice URIs ("/h/notfications" or similar) which are stable redirects, and probably add remarkup for it: !{notifications} or similar. This diff isn't related to that since it's too premature. **Search** Once we have a database generation target, we can index the documentation. **Design** Chad has some nice mocks. Test Plan: Ran `bin/diviner generate`, `bin/diviner generate --clean`. Saw appropriate graph propagation after edits. This diff doesn't do anything very useful yet. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T988 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4340
2013-01-07 23:04:23 +01:00
'DivinerFileAtomizer' => 'DivinerAtomizer',
'DivinerFindController' => 'DivinerController',
Port Diviner Core to Phabricator Summary: This implements most/all of the difficult parts of Diviner on top of Phabricator instead of as standalone components. See T988. In particular, here are the things I want to fix: **Performance** The Diviner parser works in two stages. The first stage breaks source files into "Atoms". The second stage renders atoms into a display format (e.g., HTML). Diviner currently has a good caching story on the first step of the pipeline, but zero caching in the second step. This means it's very slow, even for a fairly small project like Phabricator. We must re-render every piece of documentation every time, instead of only changed documentation. Most of this diff concerns itself with addressing this problem. There's a fairly large explanatory comment about it, but the trickiest part is that when an atom changes, other atoms (defined in other places) may also change -- for example, if `class B extends A`, editing A should dirty B, even if B is in an entirely different file. We perform analysis in two stages to propagate these changes: first detecting direct changes, then detecting indirect changes. This isn't completely implemented -- we need to propagate 'extends' through more levels -- but I believe it's structurally correct and good enough until we actually document classes. **Inheritance** Diviner currently has a very weak story on inheritance. I want to inherit a lot more metas/docs. If an interface documents a method, we should just pull that documentation in to every implementation by default (implementations can still override it if they want). It can be shown in grey or something, but it should be desirable and correct to omit documentation of a method implementation when you are implementing a parent. Similarly, I want to pull in inherited methods and @tasks and such. This diff sets up for that, by formalizing "extends" relationships between atoms. **Overspecialization** Diviner currently specializes atoms (FileAtom, FunctionAtom, ClassAtom, etc.). This is pretty much not useful, because Atomizers (which produce the atoms) need to be highly specialized, and Renderers/Publishers (which consume the atoms) also need to be highly specialized. Nothing interesting actually lives in the atom specializations, and we don't benefit from having them -- it just costs us generality in storage/caches for them. In the new code, I've used a single Atom class to represent any type of atom. **URIs** We have fairly hideous URIs right now, which are very cumbersome For in-app doc links, I want to provide nice URIs ("/h/notfications" or similar) which are stable redirects, and probably add remarkup for it: !{notifications} or similar. This diff isn't related to that since it's too premature. **Search** Once we have a database generation target, we can index the documentation. **Design** Chad has some nice mocks. Test Plan: Ran `bin/diviner generate`, `bin/diviner generate --clean`. Saw appropriate graph propagation after edits. This diff doesn't do anything very useful yet. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T988 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4340
2013-01-07 23:04:23 +01:00
'DivinerGenerateWorkflow' => 'DivinerWorkflow',
'DivinerLiveAtom' => 'DivinerDAO',
'DivinerLiveBook' => array(
'DivinerDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
),
'DivinerLiveBookEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'DivinerLiveBookTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'DivinerLiveBookTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'DivinerLivePublisher' => 'DivinerPublisher',
'DivinerLiveSymbol' => array(
'DivinerDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'DivinerMainController' => 'DivinerController',
'DivinerPHPAtomizer' => 'DivinerAtomizer',
'DivinerParameterTableView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'DivinerPublishCache' => 'DivinerDiskCache',
'DivinerPublisher' => 'Phobject',
'DivinerRenderer' => 'Phobject',
'DivinerReturnTableView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'DivinerSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'DivinerSectionView' => 'AphrontTagView',
Move Diviner further toward usability Summary: - Complete the "project" -> "book" stuff. This is cleaner conceptually and keeps us from having yet another meaning for the word "project". - Normalize symbols during atomization. This simplifies publishing a great deal, and allows static documentation to link to dynamic documentation and vice versa, because the canonical names of symbols are agreed upon (we can tweak the actual algorithm). - Give articles a specifiable name distinct from the title, and default to something like "support" instead of "Get Help! Get Support!" so URIs end up more readable (not "Get_Help!_Get_Support!"). - Have the atomizers set book information on atoms. - Implement very basic publishers. Publishers are basically glue code between the atomization process and the rendering process -- the two we'll have initially are "static" (publish to files on disk) and "phabricator" (or similar -- publish into the database). - Handle duplicate symbol definitions in the atomize and publish pipelines. This fixes the issue where a project defines two functions named "idx()" and we currently tell them not to do that and break. Realistically, this is common in the real world and we should just roll our eyes and do the legwork to generate documentation as best we can. - Particularly, dirty all atoms with the same name as a dirty atom (e.g., if 'function f()' is updated, regnerate the documentation for all functions named f() in the book). - When publishing, we publish these at "function/f/@1", "function/f/@2". The base page will offer to disambiguate ("There are 8 functions named 'f' in this codebase, which one do you want?"). - Implement a very very basic renderer. This generates the actual HTML (or text, or XML, or whatever else) for the documentation, which the publisher dumps onto disk or into a database or whatever. - The atomize workflow actually needs to depend on books, at least sort of, so make it load config and use it properly. - Propagate multilevel dirties through the graph. If "C extends B" and "B extends A", we should regenerate C when A changes. Prior to this diff, we would regnerate B only. Test Plan: Generated some documentation. Named two articles "feedback", generated docs, saw "article/feedback/@1/" and "article/feedback/@2/" created. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, chad Reviewed By: chad CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T988 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4896
2013-02-18 00:39:36 +01:00
'DivinerStaticPublisher' => 'DivinerPublisher',
'DivinerSymbolRemarkupRule' => 'PhutilRemarkupRule',
'DivinerWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'DoorkeeperAsanaFeedWorker' => 'DoorkeeperFeedWorker',
'DoorkeeperAsanaRemarkupRule' => 'DoorkeeperRemarkupRule',
'DoorkeeperBridge' => 'Phobject',
'DoorkeeperBridgeAsana' => 'DoorkeeperBridge',
'DoorkeeperBridgeJIRA' => 'DoorkeeperBridge',
'DoorkeeperBridgeJIRATestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'DoorkeeperDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'DoorkeeperExternalObject' => array(
'DoorkeeperDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'DoorkeeperExternalObjectQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'DoorkeeperFeedStoryPublisher' => 'Phobject',
'DoorkeeperFeedWorker' => 'FeedPushWorker',
'DoorkeeperImportEngine' => 'Phobject',
'DoorkeeperJIRAFeedWorker' => 'DoorkeeperFeedWorker',
'DoorkeeperJIRARemarkupRule' => 'DoorkeeperRemarkupRule',
'DoorkeeperMissingLinkException' => 'Exception',
'DoorkeeperObjectRef' => 'Phobject',
'DoorkeeperRemarkupRule' => 'PhutilRemarkupRule',
'DoorkeeperSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'DoorkeeperTagView' => 'AphrontView',
'DoorkeeperTagsController' => 'PhabricatorController',
Implement a rough AlmanacService blueprint in Drydock Summary: Ref T9253. Broadly, this realigns Allocator behavior to be more consistent and straightforward and amenable to intended future changes. This attempts to make language more consistent: resources are "allocated" and leases are "acquired". This prepares for (but does not implement) optimistic "slot locking", as discussed in D10304. Although I suspect some blueprints will need to perform other locking eventually, this does feel like a good fit for most of the locking blueprints need to do. In particular, I've made the blueprint operations on `$resource` and `$lease` objects more purposeful: they need to invoke an activator on the appropriate object to be implemented correctly. Before they invoke this activator method, they configure the object. In a future diff, this configuration will include specifying slot locks that the lease or resource must acquire. So the API will be something like: $lease ->setActivateWhenAcquired(true) ->needSlotLock('x') ->needSlotLock('y') ->acquireOnResource($resource); In the common case where slot locks are a good fit, I think this should make correct blueprint implementation very straightforward. This prepares for (but does not implement) resources and leases which need significant setup steps. I've basically carved out two modes: - The "activate immediately" mode, as here, immediately opens the resource or activates the lease. This is appropriate if little or no setup is required. I expect many leases to operate in this mode, although I expect many resources will operate in the other mode. - The "allocate now, activate later" mode, which is not fully implemented yet. This will queue setup workers when the allocator exits. Overall, this will work very similarly to Harbormaster. - This new structure makes it acceptable for blueprints to sleep as long as they want during resource allocation and lease acquisition, so long as they are not waiting on anything which needs to be completed by the queue. Putting a `sleep(15 * 60)` in your EC2Blueprint to wait for EC2 to bring a machine up will perform worse than using delayed activation, but won't deadlock the queue or block any locks. Overall, this flow is more similar to Harbormaster's flow. Having consistency between Harbormaster's model and Drydock's model is good, and I think Harbormaster's model is also simply much better than Drydock's (what exists today in Drydock was implemented a long time ago, and we had more support and infrastructure by the time Harbormaster was implemented, as well as a more clearly defined problem). The particular strength of Harbormaster is that objects always (or almost always, at least) have a single, clearly defined writer. Ensuring objects have only one writer prevents races and makes reasoning about everything easier. Drydock does not currently have a clearly defined single writer, but this moves us in that direction. We'll probably need more primitives eventually to flesh this out, like Harbormaster's command queue for messaging objects which you can't write to. This blueprint was originally implemented in D13843. This makes a few changes to the blueprint itself: - A bunch of code from that (e.g., interfaces) doesn't exist yet. - I let the blueprint have multiple services. This simplifies the code a little and seems like it costs us nothing. This also removes `bin/drydock create-resource`, which no longer makes sense to expose. It won't get locking, leasing, etc., correct, and can not be made correct. NOTE: This technically works but doesn't do anything useful yet. Test Plan: Used `bin/drydock lease --type host` to acquire leases against these blueprints. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: hach-que, chad Subscribers: Mnkras Maniphest Tasks: T9253 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14117
2015-09-21 13:43:53 +02:00
'DrydockAlmanacServiceHostBlueprintImplementation' => 'DrydockBlueprintImplementation',
'DrydockApacheWebrootInterface' => 'DrydockWebrootInterface',
Rough cut of "Blueprint Authorizations" Summary: Ref T9519. This is like 80% of the way there and doesn't fully work yet, but roughly shows the shape of things to come. Here's how it works: First, there's a new custom field type for blueprints which works like a normal typeahead but has some extra logic. It's implemented this way to make it easy to add to Blueprints in Drydock and Build Plans in Harbormaster. Here, I've added a "Use Blueprints" field to the "WorkingCopy" blueprint, so you can control which hosts the working copies are permitted to allocate on: {F869865} This control has a bit of custom rendering logic. Instead of rendering a normal list of PHIDs, it renders an annotated list with icons: {F869866} These icons show whether the blueprint on the other size of the authorization has approved this object. Once you have a green checkmark, you're good to go. On the blueprint side, things look like this: {F869867} This table shows all the objects which have asked for access to this blueprint. In this case it's showing that one object is approved to use the blueprint since I already approved it, but by default new requests come in here as "Authorization Requested" and someone has to go approve them. You approve them from within the authorization detail screen: {F869868} You can use the "Approve" or "Decline" buttons to allow or prevent use of the blueprint. This doesn't actually do anything yet -- objects don't need to be authorized in order to use blueprints quite yet. That will come in the next diff, I just wanted to get the UI in reasonable shape first. The authorization also has a second piece of state, which is whether the request from the object is active or inactive. We use this to keep track of the authorization if the blueprint is (maybe temporarily) deleted. For example, you might have a Build Plan that uses Blueprints A and B. For a couple days, you only want to use A, so you remove B from the "Use Blueprints: ..." field. Later, you can add B back and it will connect to its old authorization again, so you don't need to go re-approve things (and if you're declined, you stay declined instead of being able to request authorization over and over again). This should make working with authorizations a little easier and less labor intensive. Stuff not in this diff: - Actually preventing any allocations (next diff). - Probably should have transactions for approve/decline, at least, at some point, so there's a log of who did approvals and when. - Maybe should have a more clear/loud error state when no blueprints are approved? - Should probably restrict the typeahead to specific blueprint types. Test Plan: - Added the field. - Typed some stuff into it. - Saw the UI update properly. - Approved an authorization. - Declined an authorization. - Saw active authorizations on a blueprint page. - Didn't see any inactive authroizations there. - Clicked "View All Authorizations", saw all authorizations. Reviewers: chad, hach-que Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9519 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14251
2015-10-10 16:15:25 +02:00
'DrydockAuthorization' => array(
'DrydockDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'DrydockAuthorizationAuthorizeController' => 'DrydockController',
'DrydockAuthorizationListController' => 'DrydockController',
'DrydockAuthorizationListView' => 'AphrontView',
'DrydockAuthorizationPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'DrydockAuthorizationQuery' => 'DrydockQuery',
'DrydockAuthorizationSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'DrydockAuthorizationViewController' => 'DrydockController',
'DrydockBlueprint' => array(
'DrydockDAO',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface',
),
'DrydockBlueprintController' => 'DrydockController',
'DrydockBlueprintCoreCustomField' => array(
'DrydockBlueprintCustomField',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldInterface',
),
'DrydockBlueprintCreateController' => 'DrydockBlueprintController',
'DrydockBlueprintCustomField' => 'PhabricatorCustomField',
'DrydockBlueprintDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'DrydockBlueprintDisableController' => 'DrydockBlueprintController',
'DrydockBlueprintEditController' => 'DrydockBlueprintController',
'DrydockBlueprintEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'DrydockBlueprintImplementation' => 'Phobject',
'DrydockBlueprintImplementationTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'DrydockBlueprintListController' => 'DrydockBlueprintController',
'DrydockBlueprintPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'DrydockBlueprintQuery' => 'DrydockQuery',
'DrydockBlueprintSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'DrydockBlueprintTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'DrydockBlueprintTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'DrydockBlueprintViewController' => 'DrydockBlueprintController',
Add a command queue to Drydock to manage lease/resource release Summary: Ref T9252. Broadly, Drydock currently races on releasing objects from the "active" state. To reproduce this: - Scatter some sleep()s pretty much anywhere in the release code. - Release several times from web UI or CLI in quick succession. Resources or leases will execute some release code twice or otherwise do inconsistent things. (I didn't chase down a detailed reproduction scenario for this since inspection of the code makes it clear that there are no meaningful locks or mechanisms preventing this.) Instead, add a Harbormaster-style command queue to resources and leases. When something wants to do a release, it adds a command to the queue and schedules a worker. The workers acquire a lock, then try to consume commands from the queue. This guarantees that only one process is responsible for writes to active resource/leases. This is the last major step to giving resources and leases a single writer during all states: - Resource, Unsaved: AllocatorWorker - Resource, Pending: ResourceWorker (Possible rename to "Allocated?") - Resource, Open: This diff, ResourceUpdateWorker. (Likely rename to "Active"). - Resource, Closed/Broken: Future destruction worker. (Likely rename to "Released" / "Broken"; maybe remove "Broken"). - Resource, Destroyed: No writes. - Lease, Unsaved: Whatever wants the lease. - Lease, Pending: AllocatorWorker - Lease, Acquired: LeaseWorker - Lease, Active: This diff, LeaseUpdateWorker. - Lease, Released/Broken: Future destruction worker (Maybe remove "Broken"?) - Lease, Expired: No writes. (Likely rename to "Destroyed"). In most phases, we can already guarantee that there is a single writer without doing any extra work. This is more complicated in the "Active" case because the release buttons on the web UI, the release tools on the CLI, the lease requestor itself, the garbage collector, and any other release process cleaning up related objects may try to effect a release. All of these could race one another (and, in many cases, race other processes from other phases because all of these get to act immediately) as this code is currently written. Using a queue here lets us make sure there's only a single writer in this phase. One thing which is notable is that whatever acquires a lease **can not write to it**! It is never the writer once it queues the lease for activation. It can not write to any resources, either. And, likewise, Blueprints can not write to resources while acquiring or releasing leases. We may need to provide a mechinism so that blueprints and/or resource/lease holders get to attach some storage to resources/leases for bookkeeping. For example, a blueprint might need to keep some kind of cache on a resource to help it manage state. But I think we can cross that bridge when we come to it, and nothing else would need to write to this storage so it's technically straightforward to introduce such a mechanism if we need one. Test Plan: - Viewed buttons in web UI, checked enabled/disabled states. - Clicked the buttons. - Saw commands show up in the command queue. - Saw some daemon stuff get scheduled. - Ran CLI tools, saw commands get consumed and resources/leases release. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9252 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14143
2015-09-23 16:42:08 +02:00
'DrydockCommand' => array(
'DrydockDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
Drydock Rough Cut Summary: Rough cut of Drydock. This is very basic and doesn't do much of use yet (it //does// allocate EC2 machines as host resources and expose interfaces to them), but I think the overall structure is more or less reasonable. == Interfaces Vision: Applications interact with Drydock resources through DrydockInterfaces, like **command**, **filesystem** and **httpd** interfaces. Each interface allows applications to perform some kind of operation on the resource, like executing commands, reading/writing files, or configuring a web server. Interfaces have a concrete, specific API: // Filesystem Interface $fs = $lease->getInterface('filesystem'); // Constants, some day? $fs->writeFile('index.html', 'hello world!'); // Command Interface $cmd = $lease->getInterface('command'); echo $cmd->execx('uptime'); // HTTPD Interface $httpd = $lease->getInterface('httpd'); $httpd->restart(); Interfaces are mostly just stock, although installs might add new interfaces if they expose different ways to interact with resources (for instance, a resource might want to expose a new 'MongoDB' interface or whatever). Currently: We have like part of a command interface. == Leases Vision: Leases keep track of which resources are in use, and what they're being used for. They allow us to know when we need to allocate more resources (too many sandcastles on the existing hosts, e.g.) and when we can release resources (because they are no longer being used). They also give applications something to hold while resources are being allocated. // EXAMPLE: How this should work some day. $allocator = new DrydockAllocator(); $allocator->setResourceType('sandcastle'); $allocator->setAttributes( array( 'diffID' => $diff->getID(), )); $lease = $allocator->allocate(); $diff->setSandcastleLeaseID($lease->getID()); // ... if ($lease->getStatus() == DrydockLeaseStatus::STATUS_ACTIVE) { $sandcastle_link = $lease->getInterface('httpd')->getURI('/'); } else { $sandcastle_link = 'Still building your sandcastle...'; } echo "Sandcastle for this diff: ".$sandcastle_link; // EXAMPLE: How this actually works now. $allocator = new DrydockAllocator(); $allocator->setResourceType('host'); // NOTE: Allocation is currently synchronous but will be task-driven soon. $lease = $allocator->allocate(); Leases are completely stock, installs will not define new lease types. Currently: Leases exist and work but are very very basic. == Resources Vision: Resources represent some actual thing we've put somewhere, whether it's a host, a block of storage, a webroot, or whatever else. Applications interact through resources by acquiring leases to them, and then getting interfaces through these leases. The lease acquisition process has a side effect of allocating new resources if a lease can't be acquired on existing resources (e.g., the application wants storage but all storage resources are full) and things are configured to autoscale. Resources may themselves acquire leases in order to allocate. For instance, a storage resource might first acquire a lease to a host resource. A 'test scaffold' resource might lease a storage resource and a mysql resource. Not all resources are auto-allocate: the entry-level version of Drydock is that you manually allocate a couple boxes and configure them through the web console. Then, e.g., 'storage' / 'webroot' resources allocate on top of them, but the host pool itself does not autoscale. Resources are completely stock, they are abstract shells representing any arbitrary thing. Currently: Resource exist ('host' only) but are very very basic. == Blueprints Vision: Blueprints contain instructions for building interfaces to, (possibly) allocating, updating, managing, and destroying a specific type of resource in a specific location. One way to think of them is that they are scripts for creating and deleting resources. For example, the LocalHost, RemoteHost and EC2Host blueprints can all manage 'host' resources. Eventually, we will support more types of resources (storage, webroot, sandcastle, test scaffold, phacility deployment) and more providers for resource types, some of which will be in the Phabricator mainline and some of which will be custom. Blueprints are very custom and specific to application types, so installs will define new blueprints if they are making significant use of Drydock. Currently: They exist but have few capabilities. The stock blueprints do nearly nothing useful. There is a technically functional blueprint for host allocation in EC2. == Allocator This is just the actual code to execute the lease acquisition process. Test Plan: Ran "drydock_control.php" script, it allocated a machine in EC2, acquired a lease on it, interfaced with it, and then released the lease. Ran it again, got a fresh lease on the existing resource. Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1454
2012-01-11 20:18:40 +01:00
'DrydockCommandInterface' => 'DrydockInterface',
Add a command queue to Drydock to manage lease/resource release Summary: Ref T9252. Broadly, Drydock currently races on releasing objects from the "active" state. To reproduce this: - Scatter some sleep()s pretty much anywhere in the release code. - Release several times from web UI or CLI in quick succession. Resources or leases will execute some release code twice or otherwise do inconsistent things. (I didn't chase down a detailed reproduction scenario for this since inspection of the code makes it clear that there are no meaningful locks or mechanisms preventing this.) Instead, add a Harbormaster-style command queue to resources and leases. When something wants to do a release, it adds a command to the queue and schedules a worker. The workers acquire a lock, then try to consume commands from the queue. This guarantees that only one process is responsible for writes to active resource/leases. This is the last major step to giving resources and leases a single writer during all states: - Resource, Unsaved: AllocatorWorker - Resource, Pending: ResourceWorker (Possible rename to "Allocated?") - Resource, Open: This diff, ResourceUpdateWorker. (Likely rename to "Active"). - Resource, Closed/Broken: Future destruction worker. (Likely rename to "Released" / "Broken"; maybe remove "Broken"). - Resource, Destroyed: No writes. - Lease, Unsaved: Whatever wants the lease. - Lease, Pending: AllocatorWorker - Lease, Acquired: LeaseWorker - Lease, Active: This diff, LeaseUpdateWorker. - Lease, Released/Broken: Future destruction worker (Maybe remove "Broken"?) - Lease, Expired: No writes. (Likely rename to "Destroyed"). In most phases, we can already guarantee that there is a single writer without doing any extra work. This is more complicated in the "Active" case because the release buttons on the web UI, the release tools on the CLI, the lease requestor itself, the garbage collector, and any other release process cleaning up related objects may try to effect a release. All of these could race one another (and, in many cases, race other processes from other phases because all of these get to act immediately) as this code is currently written. Using a queue here lets us make sure there's only a single writer in this phase. One thing which is notable is that whatever acquires a lease **can not write to it**! It is never the writer once it queues the lease for activation. It can not write to any resources, either. And, likewise, Blueprints can not write to resources while acquiring or releasing leases. We may need to provide a mechinism so that blueprints and/or resource/lease holders get to attach some storage to resources/leases for bookkeeping. For example, a blueprint might need to keep some kind of cache on a resource to help it manage state. But I think we can cross that bridge when we come to it, and nothing else would need to write to this storage so it's technically straightforward to introduce such a mechanism if we need one. Test Plan: - Viewed buttons in web UI, checked enabled/disabled states. - Clicked the buttons. - Saw commands show up in the command queue. - Saw some daemon stuff get scheduled. - Ran CLI tools, saw commands get consumed and resources/leases release. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9252 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14143
2015-09-23 16:42:08 +02:00
'DrydockCommandQuery' => 'DrydockQuery',
'DrydockConsoleController' => 'DrydockController',
'DrydockConstants' => 'Phobject',
Drydock Rough Cut Summary: Rough cut of Drydock. This is very basic and doesn't do much of use yet (it //does// allocate EC2 machines as host resources and expose interfaces to them), but I think the overall structure is more or less reasonable. == Interfaces Vision: Applications interact with Drydock resources through DrydockInterfaces, like **command**, **filesystem** and **httpd** interfaces. Each interface allows applications to perform some kind of operation on the resource, like executing commands, reading/writing files, or configuring a web server. Interfaces have a concrete, specific API: // Filesystem Interface $fs = $lease->getInterface('filesystem'); // Constants, some day? $fs->writeFile('index.html', 'hello world!'); // Command Interface $cmd = $lease->getInterface('command'); echo $cmd->execx('uptime'); // HTTPD Interface $httpd = $lease->getInterface('httpd'); $httpd->restart(); Interfaces are mostly just stock, although installs might add new interfaces if they expose different ways to interact with resources (for instance, a resource might want to expose a new 'MongoDB' interface or whatever). Currently: We have like part of a command interface. == Leases Vision: Leases keep track of which resources are in use, and what they're being used for. They allow us to know when we need to allocate more resources (too many sandcastles on the existing hosts, e.g.) and when we can release resources (because they are no longer being used). They also give applications something to hold while resources are being allocated. // EXAMPLE: How this should work some day. $allocator = new DrydockAllocator(); $allocator->setResourceType('sandcastle'); $allocator->setAttributes( array( 'diffID' => $diff->getID(), )); $lease = $allocator->allocate(); $diff->setSandcastleLeaseID($lease->getID()); // ... if ($lease->getStatus() == DrydockLeaseStatus::STATUS_ACTIVE) { $sandcastle_link = $lease->getInterface('httpd')->getURI('/'); } else { $sandcastle_link = 'Still building your sandcastle...'; } echo "Sandcastle for this diff: ".$sandcastle_link; // EXAMPLE: How this actually works now. $allocator = new DrydockAllocator(); $allocator->setResourceType('host'); // NOTE: Allocation is currently synchronous but will be task-driven soon. $lease = $allocator->allocate(); Leases are completely stock, installs will not define new lease types. Currently: Leases exist and work but are very very basic. == Resources Vision: Resources represent some actual thing we've put somewhere, whether it's a host, a block of storage, a webroot, or whatever else. Applications interact through resources by acquiring leases to them, and then getting interfaces through these leases. The lease acquisition process has a side effect of allocating new resources if a lease can't be acquired on existing resources (e.g., the application wants storage but all storage resources are full) and things are configured to autoscale. Resources may themselves acquire leases in order to allocate. For instance, a storage resource might first acquire a lease to a host resource. A 'test scaffold' resource might lease a storage resource and a mysql resource. Not all resources are auto-allocate: the entry-level version of Drydock is that you manually allocate a couple boxes and configure them through the web console. Then, e.g., 'storage' / 'webroot' resources allocate on top of them, but the host pool itself does not autoscale. Resources are completely stock, they are abstract shells representing any arbitrary thing. Currently: Resource exist ('host' only) but are very very basic. == Blueprints Vision: Blueprints contain instructions for building interfaces to, (possibly) allocating, updating, managing, and destroying a specific type of resource in a specific location. One way to think of them is that they are scripts for creating and deleting resources. For example, the LocalHost, RemoteHost and EC2Host blueprints can all manage 'host' resources. Eventually, we will support more types of resources (storage, webroot, sandcastle, test scaffold, phacility deployment) and more providers for resource types, some of which will be in the Phabricator mainline and some of which will be custom. Blueprints are very custom and specific to application types, so installs will define new blueprints if they are making significant use of Drydock. Currently: They exist but have few capabilities. The stock blueprints do nearly nothing useful. There is a technically functional blueprint for host allocation in EC2. == Allocator This is just the actual code to execute the lease acquisition process. Test Plan: Ran "drydock_control.php" script, it allocated a machine in EC2, acquired a lease on it, interfaced with it, and then released the lease. Ran it again, got a fresh lease on the existing resource. Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1454
2012-01-11 20:18:40 +01:00
'DrydockController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'DrydockCreateBlueprintsCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
Drydock Rough Cut Summary: Rough cut of Drydock. This is very basic and doesn't do much of use yet (it //does// allocate EC2 machines as host resources and expose interfaces to them), but I think the overall structure is more or less reasonable. == Interfaces Vision: Applications interact with Drydock resources through DrydockInterfaces, like **command**, **filesystem** and **httpd** interfaces. Each interface allows applications to perform some kind of operation on the resource, like executing commands, reading/writing files, or configuring a web server. Interfaces have a concrete, specific API: // Filesystem Interface $fs = $lease->getInterface('filesystem'); // Constants, some day? $fs->writeFile('index.html', 'hello world!'); // Command Interface $cmd = $lease->getInterface('command'); echo $cmd->execx('uptime'); // HTTPD Interface $httpd = $lease->getInterface('httpd'); $httpd->restart(); Interfaces are mostly just stock, although installs might add new interfaces if they expose different ways to interact with resources (for instance, a resource might want to expose a new 'MongoDB' interface or whatever). Currently: We have like part of a command interface. == Leases Vision: Leases keep track of which resources are in use, and what they're being used for. They allow us to know when we need to allocate more resources (too many sandcastles on the existing hosts, e.g.) and when we can release resources (because they are no longer being used). They also give applications something to hold while resources are being allocated. // EXAMPLE: How this should work some day. $allocator = new DrydockAllocator(); $allocator->setResourceType('sandcastle'); $allocator->setAttributes( array( 'diffID' => $diff->getID(), )); $lease = $allocator->allocate(); $diff->setSandcastleLeaseID($lease->getID()); // ... if ($lease->getStatus() == DrydockLeaseStatus::STATUS_ACTIVE) { $sandcastle_link = $lease->getInterface('httpd')->getURI('/'); } else { $sandcastle_link = 'Still building your sandcastle...'; } echo "Sandcastle for this diff: ".$sandcastle_link; // EXAMPLE: How this actually works now. $allocator = new DrydockAllocator(); $allocator->setResourceType('host'); // NOTE: Allocation is currently synchronous but will be task-driven soon. $lease = $allocator->allocate(); Leases are completely stock, installs will not define new lease types. Currently: Leases exist and work but are very very basic. == Resources Vision: Resources represent some actual thing we've put somewhere, whether it's a host, a block of storage, a webroot, or whatever else. Applications interact through resources by acquiring leases to them, and then getting interfaces through these leases. The lease acquisition process has a side effect of allocating new resources if a lease can't be acquired on existing resources (e.g., the application wants storage but all storage resources are full) and things are configured to autoscale. Resources may themselves acquire leases in order to allocate. For instance, a storage resource might first acquire a lease to a host resource. A 'test scaffold' resource might lease a storage resource and a mysql resource. Not all resources are auto-allocate: the entry-level version of Drydock is that you manually allocate a couple boxes and configure them through the web console. Then, e.g., 'storage' / 'webroot' resources allocate on top of them, but the host pool itself does not autoscale. Resources are completely stock, they are abstract shells representing any arbitrary thing. Currently: Resource exist ('host' only) but are very very basic. == Blueprints Vision: Blueprints contain instructions for building interfaces to, (possibly) allocating, updating, managing, and destroying a specific type of resource in a specific location. One way to think of them is that they are scripts for creating and deleting resources. For example, the LocalHost, RemoteHost and EC2Host blueprints can all manage 'host' resources. Eventually, we will support more types of resources (storage, webroot, sandcastle, test scaffold, phacility deployment) and more providers for resource types, some of which will be in the Phabricator mainline and some of which will be custom. Blueprints are very custom and specific to application types, so installs will define new blueprints if they are making significant use of Drydock. Currently: They exist but have few capabilities. The stock blueprints do nearly nothing useful. There is a technically functional blueprint for host allocation in EC2. == Allocator This is just the actual code to execute the lease acquisition process. Test Plan: Ran "drydock_control.php" script, it allocated a machine in EC2, acquired a lease on it, interfaced with it, and then released the lease. Ran it again, got a fresh lease on the existing resource. Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1454
2012-01-11 20:18:40 +01:00
'DrydockDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'DrydockDefaultEditCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'DrydockDefaultViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'DrydockFilesystemInterface' => 'DrydockInterface',
'DrydockInterface' => 'Phobject',
'DrydockLandRepositoryOperation' => 'DrydockRepositoryOperationType',
'DrydockLease' => array(
'DrydockDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'DrydockLeaseAcquiredLogType' => 'DrydockLogType',
'DrydockLeaseActivatedLogType' => 'DrydockLogType',
'DrydockLeaseActivationFailureLogType' => 'DrydockLogType',
'DrydockLeaseActivationYieldLogType' => 'DrydockLogType',
'DrydockLeaseController' => 'DrydockController',
'DrydockLeaseDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'DrydockLeaseDestroyedLogType' => 'DrydockLogType',
'DrydockLeaseListController' => 'DrydockLeaseController',
'DrydockLeaseListView' => 'AphrontView',
'DrydockLeaseNoAuthorizationsLogType' => 'DrydockLogType',
'DrydockLeaseNoBlueprintsLogType' => 'DrydockLogType',
'DrydockLeasePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'DrydockLeaseQuery' => 'DrydockQuery',
'DrydockLeaseQueuedLogType' => 'DrydockLogType',
'DrydockLeaseReleaseController' => 'DrydockLeaseController',
'DrydockLeaseReleasedLogType' => 'DrydockLogType',
'DrydockLeaseSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
Drydock Rough Cut Summary: Rough cut of Drydock. This is very basic and doesn't do much of use yet (it //does// allocate EC2 machines as host resources and expose interfaces to them), but I think the overall structure is more or less reasonable. == Interfaces Vision: Applications interact with Drydock resources through DrydockInterfaces, like **command**, **filesystem** and **httpd** interfaces. Each interface allows applications to perform some kind of operation on the resource, like executing commands, reading/writing files, or configuring a web server. Interfaces have a concrete, specific API: // Filesystem Interface $fs = $lease->getInterface('filesystem'); // Constants, some day? $fs->writeFile('index.html', 'hello world!'); // Command Interface $cmd = $lease->getInterface('command'); echo $cmd->execx('uptime'); // HTTPD Interface $httpd = $lease->getInterface('httpd'); $httpd->restart(); Interfaces are mostly just stock, although installs might add new interfaces if they expose different ways to interact with resources (for instance, a resource might want to expose a new 'MongoDB' interface or whatever). Currently: We have like part of a command interface. == Leases Vision: Leases keep track of which resources are in use, and what they're being used for. They allow us to know when we need to allocate more resources (too many sandcastles on the existing hosts, e.g.) and when we can release resources (because they are no longer being used). They also give applications something to hold while resources are being allocated. // EXAMPLE: How this should work some day. $allocator = new DrydockAllocator(); $allocator->setResourceType('sandcastle'); $allocator->setAttributes( array( 'diffID' => $diff->getID(), )); $lease = $allocator->allocate(); $diff->setSandcastleLeaseID($lease->getID()); // ... if ($lease->getStatus() == DrydockLeaseStatus::STATUS_ACTIVE) { $sandcastle_link = $lease->getInterface('httpd')->getURI('/'); } else { $sandcastle_link = 'Still building your sandcastle...'; } echo "Sandcastle for this diff: ".$sandcastle_link; // EXAMPLE: How this actually works now. $allocator = new DrydockAllocator(); $allocator->setResourceType('host'); // NOTE: Allocation is currently synchronous but will be task-driven soon. $lease = $allocator->allocate(); Leases are completely stock, installs will not define new lease types. Currently: Leases exist and work but are very very basic. == Resources Vision: Resources represent some actual thing we've put somewhere, whether it's a host, a block of storage, a webroot, or whatever else. Applications interact through resources by acquiring leases to them, and then getting interfaces through these leases. The lease acquisition process has a side effect of allocating new resources if a lease can't be acquired on existing resources (e.g., the application wants storage but all storage resources are full) and things are configured to autoscale. Resources may themselves acquire leases in order to allocate. For instance, a storage resource might first acquire a lease to a host resource. A 'test scaffold' resource might lease a storage resource and a mysql resource. Not all resources are auto-allocate: the entry-level version of Drydock is that you manually allocate a couple boxes and configure them through the web console. Then, e.g., 'storage' / 'webroot' resources allocate on top of them, but the host pool itself does not autoscale. Resources are completely stock, they are abstract shells representing any arbitrary thing. Currently: Resource exist ('host' only) but are very very basic. == Blueprints Vision: Blueprints contain instructions for building interfaces to, (possibly) allocating, updating, managing, and destroying a specific type of resource in a specific location. One way to think of them is that they are scripts for creating and deleting resources. For example, the LocalHost, RemoteHost and EC2Host blueprints can all manage 'host' resources. Eventually, we will support more types of resources (storage, webroot, sandcastle, test scaffold, phacility deployment) and more providers for resource types, some of which will be in the Phabricator mainline and some of which will be custom. Blueprints are very custom and specific to application types, so installs will define new blueprints if they are making significant use of Drydock. Currently: They exist but have few capabilities. The stock blueprints do nearly nothing useful. There is a technically functional blueprint for host allocation in EC2. == Allocator This is just the actual code to execute the lease acquisition process. Test Plan: Ran "drydock_control.php" script, it allocated a machine in EC2, acquired a lease on it, interfaced with it, and then released the lease. Ran it again, got a fresh lease on the existing resource. Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1454
2012-01-11 20:18:40 +01:00
'DrydockLeaseStatus' => 'DrydockConstants',
Add a command queue to Drydock to manage lease/resource release Summary: Ref T9252. Broadly, Drydock currently races on releasing objects from the "active" state. To reproduce this: - Scatter some sleep()s pretty much anywhere in the release code. - Release several times from web UI or CLI in quick succession. Resources or leases will execute some release code twice or otherwise do inconsistent things. (I didn't chase down a detailed reproduction scenario for this since inspection of the code makes it clear that there are no meaningful locks or mechanisms preventing this.) Instead, add a Harbormaster-style command queue to resources and leases. When something wants to do a release, it adds a command to the queue and schedules a worker. The workers acquire a lock, then try to consume commands from the queue. This guarantees that only one process is responsible for writes to active resource/leases. This is the last major step to giving resources and leases a single writer during all states: - Resource, Unsaved: AllocatorWorker - Resource, Pending: ResourceWorker (Possible rename to "Allocated?") - Resource, Open: This diff, ResourceUpdateWorker. (Likely rename to "Active"). - Resource, Closed/Broken: Future destruction worker. (Likely rename to "Released" / "Broken"; maybe remove "Broken"). - Resource, Destroyed: No writes. - Lease, Unsaved: Whatever wants the lease. - Lease, Pending: AllocatorWorker - Lease, Acquired: LeaseWorker - Lease, Active: This diff, LeaseUpdateWorker. - Lease, Released/Broken: Future destruction worker (Maybe remove "Broken"?) - Lease, Expired: No writes. (Likely rename to "Destroyed"). In most phases, we can already guarantee that there is a single writer without doing any extra work. This is more complicated in the "Active" case because the release buttons on the web UI, the release tools on the CLI, the lease requestor itself, the garbage collector, and any other release process cleaning up related objects may try to effect a release. All of these could race one another (and, in many cases, race other processes from other phases because all of these get to act immediately) as this code is currently written. Using a queue here lets us make sure there's only a single writer in this phase. One thing which is notable is that whatever acquires a lease **can not write to it**! It is never the writer once it queues the lease for activation. It can not write to any resources, either. And, likewise, Blueprints can not write to resources while acquiring or releasing leases. We may need to provide a mechinism so that blueprints and/or resource/lease holders get to attach some storage to resources/leases for bookkeeping. For example, a blueprint might need to keep some kind of cache on a resource to help it manage state. But I think we can cross that bridge when we come to it, and nothing else would need to write to this storage so it's technically straightforward to introduce such a mechanism if we need one. Test Plan: - Viewed buttons in web UI, checked enabled/disabled states. - Clicked the buttons. - Saw commands show up in the command queue. - Saw some daemon stuff get scheduled. - Ran CLI tools, saw commands get consumed and resources/leases release. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9252 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14143
2015-09-23 16:42:08 +02:00
'DrydockLeaseUpdateWorker' => 'DrydockWorker',
'DrydockLeaseViewController' => 'DrydockLeaseController',
'DrydockLeaseWaitingForResourcesLogType' => 'DrydockLogType',
'DrydockLog' => array(
'DrydockDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'DrydockLogController' => 'DrydockController',
'DrydockLogGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'DrydockLogListController' => 'DrydockLogController',
'DrydockLogListView' => 'AphrontView',
'DrydockLogQuery' => 'DrydockQuery',
'DrydockLogSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'DrydockLogType' => 'Phobject',
'DrydockManagementCommandWorkflow' => 'DrydockManagementWorkflow',
'DrydockManagementLeaseWorkflow' => 'DrydockManagementWorkflow',
Add a command queue to Drydock to manage lease/resource release Summary: Ref T9252. Broadly, Drydock currently races on releasing objects from the "active" state. To reproduce this: - Scatter some sleep()s pretty much anywhere in the release code. - Release several times from web UI or CLI in quick succession. Resources or leases will execute some release code twice or otherwise do inconsistent things. (I didn't chase down a detailed reproduction scenario for this since inspection of the code makes it clear that there are no meaningful locks or mechanisms preventing this.) Instead, add a Harbormaster-style command queue to resources and leases. When something wants to do a release, it adds a command to the queue and schedules a worker. The workers acquire a lock, then try to consume commands from the queue. This guarantees that only one process is responsible for writes to active resource/leases. This is the last major step to giving resources and leases a single writer during all states: - Resource, Unsaved: AllocatorWorker - Resource, Pending: ResourceWorker (Possible rename to "Allocated?") - Resource, Open: This diff, ResourceUpdateWorker. (Likely rename to "Active"). - Resource, Closed/Broken: Future destruction worker. (Likely rename to "Released" / "Broken"; maybe remove "Broken"). - Resource, Destroyed: No writes. - Lease, Unsaved: Whatever wants the lease. - Lease, Pending: AllocatorWorker - Lease, Acquired: LeaseWorker - Lease, Active: This diff, LeaseUpdateWorker. - Lease, Released/Broken: Future destruction worker (Maybe remove "Broken"?) - Lease, Expired: No writes. (Likely rename to "Destroyed"). In most phases, we can already guarantee that there is a single writer without doing any extra work. This is more complicated in the "Active" case because the release buttons on the web UI, the release tools on the CLI, the lease requestor itself, the garbage collector, and any other release process cleaning up related objects may try to effect a release. All of these could race one another (and, in many cases, race other processes from other phases because all of these get to act immediately) as this code is currently written. Using a queue here lets us make sure there's only a single writer in this phase. One thing which is notable is that whatever acquires a lease **can not write to it**! It is never the writer once it queues the lease for activation. It can not write to any resources, either. And, likewise, Blueprints can not write to resources while acquiring or releasing leases. We may need to provide a mechinism so that blueprints and/or resource/lease holders get to attach some storage to resources/leases for bookkeeping. For example, a blueprint might need to keep some kind of cache on a resource to help it manage state. But I think we can cross that bridge when we come to it, and nothing else would need to write to this storage so it's technically straightforward to introduce such a mechanism if we need one. Test Plan: - Viewed buttons in web UI, checked enabled/disabled states. - Clicked the buttons. - Saw commands show up in the command queue. - Saw some daemon stuff get scheduled. - Ran CLI tools, saw commands get consumed and resources/leases release. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9252 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14143
2015-09-23 16:42:08 +02:00
'DrydockManagementReleaseLeaseWorkflow' => 'DrydockManagementWorkflow',
'DrydockManagementReleaseResourceWorkflow' => 'DrydockManagementWorkflow',
'DrydockManagementUpdateLeaseWorkflow' => 'DrydockManagementWorkflow',
'DrydockManagementUpdateResourceWorkflow' => 'DrydockManagementWorkflow',
'DrydockManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'DrydockObjectAuthorizationView' => 'AphrontView',
'DrydockQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'DrydockRepositoryOperation' => array(
'DrydockDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'DrydockRepositoryOperationListController' => 'DrydockController',
'DrydockRepositoryOperationPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'DrydockRepositoryOperationQuery' => 'DrydockQuery',
'DrydockRepositoryOperationSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'DrydockRepositoryOperationStatusController' => 'DrydockController',
'DrydockRepositoryOperationStatusView' => 'AphrontView',
'DrydockRepositoryOperationType' => 'Phobject',
'DrydockRepositoryOperationUpdateWorker' => 'DrydockWorker',
'DrydockRepositoryOperationViewController' => 'DrydockController',
'DrydockResource' => array(
'DrydockDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'DrydockResourceActivationFailureLogType' => 'DrydockLogType',
'DrydockResourceActivationYieldLogType' => 'DrydockLogType',
'DrydockResourceController' => 'DrydockController',
'DrydockResourceDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'DrydockResourceListController' => 'DrydockResourceController',
'DrydockResourceListView' => 'AphrontView',
'DrydockResourcePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'DrydockResourceQuery' => 'DrydockQuery',
Add a command queue to Drydock to manage lease/resource release Summary: Ref T9252. Broadly, Drydock currently races on releasing objects from the "active" state. To reproduce this: - Scatter some sleep()s pretty much anywhere in the release code. - Release several times from web UI or CLI in quick succession. Resources or leases will execute some release code twice or otherwise do inconsistent things. (I didn't chase down a detailed reproduction scenario for this since inspection of the code makes it clear that there are no meaningful locks or mechanisms preventing this.) Instead, add a Harbormaster-style command queue to resources and leases. When something wants to do a release, it adds a command to the queue and schedules a worker. The workers acquire a lock, then try to consume commands from the queue. This guarantees that only one process is responsible for writes to active resource/leases. This is the last major step to giving resources and leases a single writer during all states: - Resource, Unsaved: AllocatorWorker - Resource, Pending: ResourceWorker (Possible rename to "Allocated?") - Resource, Open: This diff, ResourceUpdateWorker. (Likely rename to "Active"). - Resource, Closed/Broken: Future destruction worker. (Likely rename to "Released" / "Broken"; maybe remove "Broken"). - Resource, Destroyed: No writes. - Lease, Unsaved: Whatever wants the lease. - Lease, Pending: AllocatorWorker - Lease, Acquired: LeaseWorker - Lease, Active: This diff, LeaseUpdateWorker. - Lease, Released/Broken: Future destruction worker (Maybe remove "Broken"?) - Lease, Expired: No writes. (Likely rename to "Destroyed"). In most phases, we can already guarantee that there is a single writer without doing any extra work. This is more complicated in the "Active" case because the release buttons on the web UI, the release tools on the CLI, the lease requestor itself, the garbage collector, and any other release process cleaning up related objects may try to effect a release. All of these could race one another (and, in many cases, race other processes from other phases because all of these get to act immediately) as this code is currently written. Using a queue here lets us make sure there's only a single writer in this phase. One thing which is notable is that whatever acquires a lease **can not write to it**! It is never the writer once it queues the lease for activation. It can not write to any resources, either. And, likewise, Blueprints can not write to resources while acquiring or releasing leases. We may need to provide a mechinism so that blueprints and/or resource/lease holders get to attach some storage to resources/leases for bookkeeping. For example, a blueprint might need to keep some kind of cache on a resource to help it manage state. But I think we can cross that bridge when we come to it, and nothing else would need to write to this storage so it's technically straightforward to introduce such a mechanism if we need one. Test Plan: - Viewed buttons in web UI, checked enabled/disabled states. - Clicked the buttons. - Saw commands show up in the command queue. - Saw some daemon stuff get scheduled. - Ran CLI tools, saw commands get consumed and resources/leases release. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9252 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14143
2015-09-23 16:42:08 +02:00
'DrydockResourceReleaseController' => 'DrydockResourceController',
'DrydockResourceSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
Drydock Rough Cut Summary: Rough cut of Drydock. This is very basic and doesn't do much of use yet (it //does// allocate EC2 machines as host resources and expose interfaces to them), but I think the overall structure is more or less reasonable. == Interfaces Vision: Applications interact with Drydock resources through DrydockInterfaces, like **command**, **filesystem** and **httpd** interfaces. Each interface allows applications to perform some kind of operation on the resource, like executing commands, reading/writing files, or configuring a web server. Interfaces have a concrete, specific API: // Filesystem Interface $fs = $lease->getInterface('filesystem'); // Constants, some day? $fs->writeFile('index.html', 'hello world!'); // Command Interface $cmd = $lease->getInterface('command'); echo $cmd->execx('uptime'); // HTTPD Interface $httpd = $lease->getInterface('httpd'); $httpd->restart(); Interfaces are mostly just stock, although installs might add new interfaces if they expose different ways to interact with resources (for instance, a resource might want to expose a new 'MongoDB' interface or whatever). Currently: We have like part of a command interface. == Leases Vision: Leases keep track of which resources are in use, and what they're being used for. They allow us to know when we need to allocate more resources (too many sandcastles on the existing hosts, e.g.) and when we can release resources (because they are no longer being used). They also give applications something to hold while resources are being allocated. // EXAMPLE: How this should work some day. $allocator = new DrydockAllocator(); $allocator->setResourceType('sandcastle'); $allocator->setAttributes( array( 'diffID' => $diff->getID(), )); $lease = $allocator->allocate(); $diff->setSandcastleLeaseID($lease->getID()); // ... if ($lease->getStatus() == DrydockLeaseStatus::STATUS_ACTIVE) { $sandcastle_link = $lease->getInterface('httpd')->getURI('/'); } else { $sandcastle_link = 'Still building your sandcastle...'; } echo "Sandcastle for this diff: ".$sandcastle_link; // EXAMPLE: How this actually works now. $allocator = new DrydockAllocator(); $allocator->setResourceType('host'); // NOTE: Allocation is currently synchronous but will be task-driven soon. $lease = $allocator->allocate(); Leases are completely stock, installs will not define new lease types. Currently: Leases exist and work but are very very basic. == Resources Vision: Resources represent some actual thing we've put somewhere, whether it's a host, a block of storage, a webroot, or whatever else. Applications interact through resources by acquiring leases to them, and then getting interfaces through these leases. The lease acquisition process has a side effect of allocating new resources if a lease can't be acquired on existing resources (e.g., the application wants storage but all storage resources are full) and things are configured to autoscale. Resources may themselves acquire leases in order to allocate. For instance, a storage resource might first acquire a lease to a host resource. A 'test scaffold' resource might lease a storage resource and a mysql resource. Not all resources are auto-allocate: the entry-level version of Drydock is that you manually allocate a couple boxes and configure them through the web console. Then, e.g., 'storage' / 'webroot' resources allocate on top of them, but the host pool itself does not autoscale. Resources are completely stock, they are abstract shells representing any arbitrary thing. Currently: Resource exist ('host' only) but are very very basic. == Blueprints Vision: Blueprints contain instructions for building interfaces to, (possibly) allocating, updating, managing, and destroying a specific type of resource in a specific location. One way to think of them is that they are scripts for creating and deleting resources. For example, the LocalHost, RemoteHost and EC2Host blueprints can all manage 'host' resources. Eventually, we will support more types of resources (storage, webroot, sandcastle, test scaffold, phacility deployment) and more providers for resource types, some of which will be in the Phabricator mainline and some of which will be custom. Blueprints are very custom and specific to application types, so installs will define new blueprints if they are making significant use of Drydock. Currently: They exist but have few capabilities. The stock blueprints do nearly nothing useful. There is a technically functional blueprint for host allocation in EC2. == Allocator This is just the actual code to execute the lease acquisition process. Test Plan: Ran "drydock_control.php" script, it allocated a machine in EC2, acquired a lease on it, interfaced with it, and then released the lease. Ran it again, got a fresh lease on the existing resource. Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1454
2012-01-11 20:18:40 +01:00
'DrydockResourceStatus' => 'DrydockConstants',
Add a command queue to Drydock to manage lease/resource release Summary: Ref T9252. Broadly, Drydock currently races on releasing objects from the "active" state. To reproduce this: - Scatter some sleep()s pretty much anywhere in the release code. - Release several times from web UI or CLI in quick succession. Resources or leases will execute some release code twice or otherwise do inconsistent things. (I didn't chase down a detailed reproduction scenario for this since inspection of the code makes it clear that there are no meaningful locks or mechanisms preventing this.) Instead, add a Harbormaster-style command queue to resources and leases. When something wants to do a release, it adds a command to the queue and schedules a worker. The workers acquire a lock, then try to consume commands from the queue. This guarantees that only one process is responsible for writes to active resource/leases. This is the last major step to giving resources and leases a single writer during all states: - Resource, Unsaved: AllocatorWorker - Resource, Pending: ResourceWorker (Possible rename to "Allocated?") - Resource, Open: This diff, ResourceUpdateWorker. (Likely rename to "Active"). - Resource, Closed/Broken: Future destruction worker. (Likely rename to "Released" / "Broken"; maybe remove "Broken"). - Resource, Destroyed: No writes. - Lease, Unsaved: Whatever wants the lease. - Lease, Pending: AllocatorWorker - Lease, Acquired: LeaseWorker - Lease, Active: This diff, LeaseUpdateWorker. - Lease, Released/Broken: Future destruction worker (Maybe remove "Broken"?) - Lease, Expired: No writes. (Likely rename to "Destroyed"). In most phases, we can already guarantee that there is a single writer without doing any extra work. This is more complicated in the "Active" case because the release buttons on the web UI, the release tools on the CLI, the lease requestor itself, the garbage collector, and any other release process cleaning up related objects may try to effect a release. All of these could race one another (and, in many cases, race other processes from other phases because all of these get to act immediately) as this code is currently written. Using a queue here lets us make sure there's only a single writer in this phase. One thing which is notable is that whatever acquires a lease **can not write to it**! It is never the writer once it queues the lease for activation. It can not write to any resources, either. And, likewise, Blueprints can not write to resources while acquiring or releasing leases. We may need to provide a mechinism so that blueprints and/or resource/lease holders get to attach some storage to resources/leases for bookkeeping. For example, a blueprint might need to keep some kind of cache on a resource to help it manage state. But I think we can cross that bridge when we come to it, and nothing else would need to write to this storage so it's technically straightforward to introduce such a mechanism if we need one. Test Plan: - Viewed buttons in web UI, checked enabled/disabled states. - Clicked the buttons. - Saw commands show up in the command queue. - Saw some daemon stuff get scheduled. - Ran CLI tools, saw commands get consumed and resources/leases release. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9252 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14143
2015-09-23 16:42:08 +02:00
'DrydockResourceUpdateWorker' => 'DrydockWorker',
'DrydockResourceViewController' => 'DrydockResourceController',
'DrydockSFTPFilesystemInterface' => 'DrydockFilesystemInterface',
Drydock Rough Cut Summary: Rough cut of Drydock. This is very basic and doesn't do much of use yet (it //does// allocate EC2 machines as host resources and expose interfaces to them), but I think the overall structure is more or less reasonable. == Interfaces Vision: Applications interact with Drydock resources through DrydockInterfaces, like **command**, **filesystem** and **httpd** interfaces. Each interface allows applications to perform some kind of operation on the resource, like executing commands, reading/writing files, or configuring a web server. Interfaces have a concrete, specific API: // Filesystem Interface $fs = $lease->getInterface('filesystem'); // Constants, some day? $fs->writeFile('index.html', 'hello world!'); // Command Interface $cmd = $lease->getInterface('command'); echo $cmd->execx('uptime'); // HTTPD Interface $httpd = $lease->getInterface('httpd'); $httpd->restart(); Interfaces are mostly just stock, although installs might add new interfaces if they expose different ways to interact with resources (for instance, a resource might want to expose a new 'MongoDB' interface or whatever). Currently: We have like part of a command interface. == Leases Vision: Leases keep track of which resources are in use, and what they're being used for. They allow us to know when we need to allocate more resources (too many sandcastles on the existing hosts, e.g.) and when we can release resources (because they are no longer being used). They also give applications something to hold while resources are being allocated. // EXAMPLE: How this should work some day. $allocator = new DrydockAllocator(); $allocator->setResourceType('sandcastle'); $allocator->setAttributes( array( 'diffID' => $diff->getID(), )); $lease = $allocator->allocate(); $diff->setSandcastleLeaseID($lease->getID()); // ... if ($lease->getStatus() == DrydockLeaseStatus::STATUS_ACTIVE) { $sandcastle_link = $lease->getInterface('httpd')->getURI('/'); } else { $sandcastle_link = 'Still building your sandcastle...'; } echo "Sandcastle for this diff: ".$sandcastle_link; // EXAMPLE: How this actually works now. $allocator = new DrydockAllocator(); $allocator->setResourceType('host'); // NOTE: Allocation is currently synchronous but will be task-driven soon. $lease = $allocator->allocate(); Leases are completely stock, installs will not define new lease types. Currently: Leases exist and work but are very very basic. == Resources Vision: Resources represent some actual thing we've put somewhere, whether it's a host, a block of storage, a webroot, or whatever else. Applications interact through resources by acquiring leases to them, and then getting interfaces through these leases. The lease acquisition process has a side effect of allocating new resources if a lease can't be acquired on existing resources (e.g., the application wants storage but all storage resources are full) and things are configured to autoscale. Resources may themselves acquire leases in order to allocate. For instance, a storage resource might first acquire a lease to a host resource. A 'test scaffold' resource might lease a storage resource and a mysql resource. Not all resources are auto-allocate: the entry-level version of Drydock is that you manually allocate a couple boxes and configure them through the web console. Then, e.g., 'storage' / 'webroot' resources allocate on top of them, but the host pool itself does not autoscale. Resources are completely stock, they are abstract shells representing any arbitrary thing. Currently: Resource exist ('host' only) but are very very basic. == Blueprints Vision: Blueprints contain instructions for building interfaces to, (possibly) allocating, updating, managing, and destroying a specific type of resource in a specific location. One way to think of them is that they are scripts for creating and deleting resources. For example, the LocalHost, RemoteHost and EC2Host blueprints can all manage 'host' resources. Eventually, we will support more types of resources (storage, webroot, sandcastle, test scaffold, phacility deployment) and more providers for resource types, some of which will be in the Phabricator mainline and some of which will be custom. Blueprints are very custom and specific to application types, so installs will define new blueprints if they are making significant use of Drydock. Currently: They exist but have few capabilities. The stock blueprints do nearly nothing useful. There is a technically functional blueprint for host allocation in EC2. == Allocator This is just the actual code to execute the lease acquisition process. Test Plan: Ran "drydock_control.php" script, it allocated a machine in EC2, acquired a lease on it, interfaced with it, and then released the lease. Ran it again, got a fresh lease on the existing resource. Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1454
2012-01-11 20:18:40 +01:00
'DrydockSSHCommandInterface' => 'DrydockCommandInterface',
Implement optimistic "slot locks" in Drydock Summary: See discussion in D10304. There's a lot of context there, but the general idea is: - Blueprints should manage locks in a granular way during the actual allocation/acquisition phase. - Optimistic "slot locks" might a pretty good primitive to make that easy to implement and reason about in most cases. The way these locks work is that you just pick some name for the lock (like the PHID of a resource) and say that it needs to be acquired for the allocation/acquisition to work: ``` ... ->needSlotLock("mylock(PHID-XYZQ-...)") ... ``` When you fire off the acquisition or allocation, it fails unless it could acquire the slot with that name. This is really simple (no explicit lock management) and a pretty good fit for most of the locking that blueprints and leases need to do. If you need to do limit-based locks (e.g., maximum of 3 locks) you could acquire a lock like this: ``` mylock(whatever).slot(2) ``` Blueprints generally only contend with themselves, so it's normally OK for them to pick whatever strategy works best for them in naming locks. This may not work as well if you have a huge number of slots (e.g., 100TB you want to give out in 1MB chunks), or other complex needs for locks (like you have to synchronize access to some external resource), but slot locks don't need to be the only mechanism that blueprints use. If they run into a problem that slot locks aren't a good fit for, they can use something else instead. For now, slot locks seem like a good fit for the problems we currently face and most of the problems I anticipate facing. (The release workflows have other race issues which I'm not addressing here. They work fine if nothing races, but aren't race-safe.) Test Plan: To create a race where the same binding is allocated as a resource twice: - Add `sleep(10)` near the beginning of `allocateResource()`, after the free bindings are loaded but before resources are allocated. - (Comment out slot lock acquisition if you have this patch.) - Run `bin/drydock lease ...` in two windows, within 10 seconds of one another. This will reliably double-allocate the binding because both blueprints see a view of the world where the binding is free. To verify the lock works, un-comment it (or apply this patch) and run the same test again. Now, the lock fails in one process and only one resource is allocated. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: hach-que, chad Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14118
2015-09-21 13:45:25 +02:00
'DrydockSlotLock' => 'DrydockDAO',
'DrydockSlotLockException' => 'Exception',
'DrydockSlotLockFailureLogType' => 'DrydockLogType',
'DrydockTestRepositoryOperation' => 'DrydockRepositoryOperationType',
'DrydockWebrootInterface' => 'DrydockInterface',
'DrydockWorker' => 'PhabricatorWorker',
'DrydockWorkingCopyBlueprintImplementation' => 'DrydockBlueprintImplementation',
'FeedConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'FeedPublishConduitAPIMethod' => 'FeedConduitAPIMethod',
Push feed publishing deeper into the task queue Summary: Ref T2852. I want to model Asana integration as a response to feed events. Currently, we queue one feed event for each HTTP hook. Instead, always queue one feed event and then have it queue any necessary followup events (now, http hooks; soon, asana). Add a script to make it easy to reproducibly fire feed event publishing. Test Plan: Republished a feed event and verified it hit configured HTTP hooks correctly. $ ./bin/feed republish 5765774156541908292 --trace >>> [2] <connect> phabricator2_feed <<< [2] <connect> 1,660 us >>> [3] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC <<< [3] <query> 595 us >>> [4] <connect> phabricator2_differential <<< [4] <connect> 760 us >>> [5] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [5] <query> 478 us >>> [6] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [6] <query> 449 us >>> [7] <connect> phabricator2_user <<< [7] <connect> 1,062 us >>> [8] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') <<< [8] <query> 540 us >>> [9] <connect> phabricator2_file <<< [9] <connect> 951 us >>> [10] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7') <<< [10] <query> 498 us >>> [11] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo <<< [11] <query> 507 us Republishing story... >>> [12] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC <<< [12] <query> 685 us >>> [13] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [13] <query> 489 us >>> [14] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [14] <query> 512 us >>> [15] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') <<< [15] <query> 601 us >>> [16] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7') <<< [16] <query> 405 us >>> [17] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo <<< [17] <query> 551 us >>> [18] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC <<< [18] <query> 507 us >>> [19] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [19] <query> 428 us >>> [20] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [20] <query> 419 us >>> [21] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') <<< [21] <query> 591 us >>> [22] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7') <<< [22] <query> 406 us >>> [23] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo <<< [23] <query> 593 us >>> [24] <http> http://127.0.0.1/derp/ <<< [24] <http> 746,157 us [2013-06-24 20:23:26] EXCEPTION: (HTTPFutureResponseStatusHTTP) [HTTP/500] Internal Server Error Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2852 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6291
2013-06-26 01:29:47 +02:00
'FeedPublisherHTTPWorker' => 'FeedPushWorker',
'FeedPublisherWorker' => 'FeedPushWorker',
'FeedPushWorker' => 'PhabricatorWorker',
'FeedQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'FeedConduitAPIMethod',
'FeedStoryNotificationGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
Add a chunking storage engine for files Summary: Ref T7149. This isn't complete and isn't active yet, but does basically work. I'll shore it up in the next few diffs. The new workflow goes like this: > Client, file.allocate(): I'd like to upload a file with length L, metadata M, and hash H. Then the server returns `upload` (a boolean) and `filePHID` (a PHID). These mean: | upload | filePHID | means | |---|---|---| | false | false | Server can't accept file. | false | true | File data already known, file created from hash. | true | false | Just upload normally. | true | true | Query chunks to start or resume a chunked upload. All but the last case are uninteresting and work like exising uploads with `file.uploadhash` (which we can eventually deprecate). In the last case: > Client, file.querychunks(): Give me a list of chunks that I should upload. This returns all the chunks for the file. Chunks have a start byte, an end byte, and a "complete" flag to indicate that the server already has the data. Then, the client fills in chunks by sending them: > Client, file.uploadchunk(): Here is the data for one chunk. This stuff doesn't work yet or has some caveats: - I haven't tested resume much. - Files need an "isPartial()" flag for partial uploads, and the UI needs to respect it. - The JS client needs to become chunk-aware. - Chunk size is set crazy low to make testing easier. - Some debugging flags that I'll remove soon-ish. - Downloading works, but still streams the whole file into memory. - This storage engine is disabled by default (hardcoded as a unit test engine) because it's still sketchy. - Need some code to remove the "isParital" flag when the last chunk is uploaded. - Maybe do checksumming on chunks. Test Plan: - Hacked up `arc upload` (see next diff) to be chunk-aware and uploaded a readme in 18 32-byte chunks. Then downloaded it. Got the same file back that I uploaded. - File UI now shows some basic chunk info for chunked files: {F336434} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7149 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12060
2015-03-13 19:30:02 +01:00
'FileAllocateConduitAPIMethod' => 'FileConduitAPIMethod',
'FileConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'FileCreateMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorMailReceiver',
'FileDownloadConduitAPIMethod' => 'FileConduitAPIMethod',
'FileInfoConduitAPIMethod' => 'FileConduitAPIMethod',
'FileMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver',
Add a chunking storage engine for files Summary: Ref T7149. This isn't complete and isn't active yet, but does basically work. I'll shore it up in the next few diffs. The new workflow goes like this: > Client, file.allocate(): I'd like to upload a file with length L, metadata M, and hash H. Then the server returns `upload` (a boolean) and `filePHID` (a PHID). These mean: | upload | filePHID | means | |---|---|---| | false | false | Server can't accept file. | false | true | File data already known, file created from hash. | true | false | Just upload normally. | true | true | Query chunks to start or resume a chunked upload. All but the last case are uninteresting and work like exising uploads with `file.uploadhash` (which we can eventually deprecate). In the last case: > Client, file.querychunks(): Give me a list of chunks that I should upload. This returns all the chunks for the file. Chunks have a start byte, an end byte, and a "complete" flag to indicate that the server already has the data. Then, the client fills in chunks by sending them: > Client, file.uploadchunk(): Here is the data for one chunk. This stuff doesn't work yet or has some caveats: - I haven't tested resume much. - Files need an "isPartial()" flag for partial uploads, and the UI needs to respect it. - The JS client needs to become chunk-aware. - Chunk size is set crazy low to make testing easier. - Some debugging flags that I'll remove soon-ish. - Downloading works, but still streams the whole file into memory. - This storage engine is disabled by default (hardcoded as a unit test engine) because it's still sketchy. - Need some code to remove the "isParital" flag when the last chunk is uploaded. - Maybe do checksumming on chunks. Test Plan: - Hacked up `arc upload` (see next diff) to be chunk-aware and uploaded a readme in 18 32-byte chunks. Then downloaded it. Got the same file back that I uploaded. - File UI now shows some basic chunk info for chunked files: {F336434} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7149 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12060
2015-03-13 19:30:02 +01:00
'FileQueryChunksConduitAPIMethod' => 'FileConduitAPIMethod',
'FileReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
Add a chunking storage engine for files Summary: Ref T7149. This isn't complete and isn't active yet, but does basically work. I'll shore it up in the next few diffs. The new workflow goes like this: > Client, file.allocate(): I'd like to upload a file with length L, metadata M, and hash H. Then the server returns `upload` (a boolean) and `filePHID` (a PHID). These mean: | upload | filePHID | means | |---|---|---| | false | false | Server can't accept file. | false | true | File data already known, file created from hash. | true | false | Just upload normally. | true | true | Query chunks to start or resume a chunked upload. All but the last case are uninteresting and work like exising uploads with `file.uploadhash` (which we can eventually deprecate). In the last case: > Client, file.querychunks(): Give me a list of chunks that I should upload. This returns all the chunks for the file. Chunks have a start byte, an end byte, and a "complete" flag to indicate that the server already has the data. Then, the client fills in chunks by sending them: > Client, file.uploadchunk(): Here is the data for one chunk. This stuff doesn't work yet or has some caveats: - I haven't tested resume much. - Files need an "isPartial()" flag for partial uploads, and the UI needs to respect it. - The JS client needs to become chunk-aware. - Chunk size is set crazy low to make testing easier. - Some debugging flags that I'll remove soon-ish. - Downloading works, but still streams the whole file into memory. - This storage engine is disabled by default (hardcoded as a unit test engine) because it's still sketchy. - Need some code to remove the "isParital" flag when the last chunk is uploaded. - Maybe do checksumming on chunks. Test Plan: - Hacked up `arc upload` (see next diff) to be chunk-aware and uploaded a readme in 18 32-byte chunks. Then downloaded it. Got the same file back that I uploaded. - File UI now shows some basic chunk info for chunked files: {F336434} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7149 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12060
2015-03-13 19:30:02 +01:00
'FileUploadChunkConduitAPIMethod' => 'FileConduitAPIMethod',
'FileUploadConduitAPIMethod' => 'FileConduitAPIMethod',
'FileUploadHashConduitAPIMethod' => 'FileConduitAPIMethod',
'FilesDefaultViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'FlagConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'FlagDeleteConduitAPIMethod' => 'FlagConduitAPIMethod',
'FlagEditConduitAPIMethod' => 'FlagConduitAPIMethod',
'FlagQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'FlagConduitAPIMethod',
'FundBacker' => array(
'FundDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
),
'FundBackerCart' => 'PhortuneCartImplementation',
'FundBackerEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'FundBackerListController' => 'FundController',
'FundBackerPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'FundBackerProduct' => 'PhortuneProductImplementation',
'FundBackerQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'FundBackerSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'FundBackerTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'FundBackerTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'FundController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'FundCreateInitiativesCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'FundDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'FundDefaultViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'FundInitiative' => array(
'FundDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorMentionableInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'FundInitiativeBackController' => 'FundController',
'FundInitiativeCloseController' => 'FundController',
'FundInitiativeEditController' => 'FundController',
'FundInitiativeEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'FundInitiativeIndexer' => 'PhabricatorSearchDocumentIndexer',
'FundInitiativeListController' => 'FundController',
'FundInitiativePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'FundInitiativeQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'FundInitiativeRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'FundInitiativeReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'FundInitiativeSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'FundInitiativeTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'FundInitiativeTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'FundInitiativeViewController' => 'FundController',
'FundSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
Add "Autoplans" to Harbormaster Summary: Ref T8095. Two general problems: - I want Harbormaster to own all lint and unit test results. - I don't want users to have to configure anything for `arc` to keep working automatically. These are in conflict because generic lint/unit test ownership in Harbormaster requires that build targets exist which we can attach build results to. However, we can't currently create build targets on demand: Harbormaster assumes it is responsible for creating targets, then running code or making third-party service calls to actually run the builds. I considered two broad approaches to let `arc` push results into Harbormaster without requiring administrators to configure some kind of "arc results" build plan: # Add magic target PHIDs like `PHID-MAGIC-this-is-really-arc-unit`. # Add new code to build real targets with real PHIDs. (1) is probably a bit less work to get off the ground, but I think it's worse overall and very likely to create more problems in the long run. I particularly worry that it will lead to a small amount of special casing in a very large number of places, which seems more fragile. (2) is more work upfront but I think does a better job of putting all the special casing in one place that we can, e.g., more reasonably unit test, and letting the rest of the code rarely/never care about this case since it's just dealing with normal plans/steps/targets as far as it can tell. This diff introduces "autoplans", which are source templates for plans/steps. This let us "push" these targets into Harbormaster. Hypthetically, any process "like" arc can use autoplans to upload test/lint/etc results. In practice, probably only `arc` will ever use this, but I think it's still quite a bit cleaner than the alternative despite all the generality. Workflow is basically: - `arc` creates a diff. - `arc` calls `harbormaster.queryautotargets`, passing the diff PHID and saying "I have some lint and unit results I want to stick on this thing". - Harbormaster builds the plan, steps, and targets (if any of them don't already exist), and hands back the target PHIDs so `arc` has a completely standard-looking place to put results. - `arc` uploads the test results to the right targets, as though Harbormaster had asked it to run unit/lint in the first place. (This doesn't actually do any of that yet, just sets things up.) I'll maybe doc turn that ^^^^^^ into a doc for posterity since I think it's hard to guess what an "autotarget" is, but I'm going to grab some lunch first. Test Plan: - Added unit tests to make sure we can build these things properly. - Used `harbormaster.queryautotargets` to build autotargets for a bunch of diffs. - Verified targets come up in "waiting for message" state. - Verified plans and steps are not editable. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T8095 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13345
2015-06-21 18:04:21 +02:00
'HarbormasterArcLintBuildStepImplementation' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepImplementation',
'HarbormasterArcUnitBuildStepImplementation' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepImplementation',
Add `harbormaster.createartifact` Summary: Ref T8659. In the general case, this eventually allows build processes to do things like: - Upload build results (like a ".app" or ".exe" or other binary). - Pass complex results between build steps (e.g., build step A does something hard and build step B uses it to do something else). Today, we're a long way away from having the infrastructure for that. However, it is useful to let third party build processes (like Jenkins) upload URIs that link back to the external build results. This adds `harbormaster.createartifact` so they can do that. The only useful thing to do with this method today is have your Jenkins build do this: params = array( "uri": "https://jenkins.mycompany.com/build/23923/details/", "name": "View Build Results in Jenkins", "ui.external": true, ); harbormaster.createartifact(target, 'uri', params); Then (after the next diff) we'll show a link in Differential and a prominent link in Harbormaster. I didn't actually do the UI stuff in this diff since it's already pretty big. This change moves a lot of code around, too: - Adds PHIDs to artifacts. - It modularizes build artifact types (currently "file", "host" and "URI"). - It formalizes build artifact parameters and construction: - This lets me generate usable documentation about how to create artifacts. - This prevents users from doing dangerous or policy-violating things. - It does some other general modernization. Test Plan: {F715633} {F715634} Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T8659 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13900
2015-08-15 16:28:56 +02:00
'HarbormasterArtifact' => 'Phobject',
Add "Autoplans" to Harbormaster Summary: Ref T8095. Two general problems: - I want Harbormaster to own all lint and unit test results. - I don't want users to have to configure anything for `arc` to keep working automatically. These are in conflict because generic lint/unit test ownership in Harbormaster requires that build targets exist which we can attach build results to. However, we can't currently create build targets on demand: Harbormaster assumes it is responsible for creating targets, then running code or making third-party service calls to actually run the builds. I considered two broad approaches to let `arc` push results into Harbormaster without requiring administrators to configure some kind of "arc results" build plan: # Add magic target PHIDs like `PHID-MAGIC-this-is-really-arc-unit`. # Add new code to build real targets with real PHIDs. (1) is probably a bit less work to get off the ground, but I think it's worse overall and very likely to create more problems in the long run. I particularly worry that it will lead to a small amount of special casing in a very large number of places, which seems more fragile. (2) is more work upfront but I think does a better job of putting all the special casing in one place that we can, e.g., more reasonably unit test, and letting the rest of the code rarely/never care about this case since it's just dealing with normal plans/steps/targets as far as it can tell. This diff introduces "autoplans", which are source templates for plans/steps. This let us "push" these targets into Harbormaster. Hypthetically, any process "like" arc can use autoplans to upload test/lint/etc results. In practice, probably only `arc` will ever use this, but I think it's still quite a bit cleaner than the alternative despite all the generality. Workflow is basically: - `arc` creates a diff. - `arc` calls `harbormaster.queryautotargets`, passing the diff PHID and saying "I have some lint and unit results I want to stick on this thing". - Harbormaster builds the plan, steps, and targets (if any of them don't already exist), and hands back the target PHIDs so `arc` has a completely standard-looking place to put results. - `arc` uploads the test results to the right targets, as though Harbormaster had asked it to run unit/lint in the first place. (This doesn't actually do any of that yet, just sets things up.) I'll maybe doc turn that ^^^^^^ into a doc for posterity since I think it's hard to guess what an "autotarget" is, but I'm going to grab some lunch first. Test Plan: - Added unit tests to make sure we can build these things properly. - Used `harbormaster.queryautotargets` to build autotargets for a bunch of diffs. - Verified targets come up in "waiting for message" state. - Verified plans and steps are not editable. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T8095 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13345
2015-06-21 18:04:21 +02:00
'HarbormasterAutotargetsTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'HarbormasterBuild' => array(
'HarbormasterDAO',
Transactions - deploy buildTransactionTimeline to remaining applications Summary: Ref T4712. Specifically... - Differential - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Audit - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Repository - one object needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) - Ponder - BONUS BUG FIX - leaving a comment on an answer had a bad redirect URI - both PonderQuestion and PonderAnswer needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on both "history" controllers - left a "TODO" on buildAnswers on the question view controller, which is non-standard and should be re-written eventually - Phortune - BONUS BUG FIX - fix new user "createNewAccount" code to not fatal - PhortuneAccount, PhortuneMerchant, and PhortuneCart needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on Account view, merchant view, and cart view controller - Fund - Legalpad - Nuance - NuanceSource needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Releeph (this product is kind of a mess...) - HACKQUEST - had to manually create an arcanist project to even be able to make a "product" and get started...! - BONUS BUG FIX - make sure to "setName" on product edit - ReleephProject (should be ReleepProduct...?), ReleephBranch, and ReleepRequest needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Harbormaster - HarbormasterBuildable, HarbormasterBuild, HarbormasterBuildPlan, and HarbormasterBuildStep all needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) all over the place Test Plan: foreach application, viewed the timeline(s) and made sure they still rendered Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4712 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10925
2014-12-04 00:35:47 +01:00
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
),
'HarbormasterBuildAbortedException' => 'Exception',
'HarbormasterBuildActionController' => 'HarbormasterController',
Add "Autoplans" to Harbormaster Summary: Ref T8095. Two general problems: - I want Harbormaster to own all lint and unit test results. - I don't want users to have to configure anything for `arc` to keep working automatically. These are in conflict because generic lint/unit test ownership in Harbormaster requires that build targets exist which we can attach build results to. However, we can't currently create build targets on demand: Harbormaster assumes it is responsible for creating targets, then running code or making third-party service calls to actually run the builds. I considered two broad approaches to let `arc` push results into Harbormaster without requiring administrators to configure some kind of "arc results" build plan: # Add magic target PHIDs like `PHID-MAGIC-this-is-really-arc-unit`. # Add new code to build real targets with real PHIDs. (1) is probably a bit less work to get off the ground, but I think it's worse overall and very likely to create more problems in the long run. I particularly worry that it will lead to a small amount of special casing in a very large number of places, which seems more fragile. (2) is more work upfront but I think does a better job of putting all the special casing in one place that we can, e.g., more reasonably unit test, and letting the rest of the code rarely/never care about this case since it's just dealing with normal plans/steps/targets as far as it can tell. This diff introduces "autoplans", which are source templates for plans/steps. This let us "push" these targets into Harbormaster. Hypthetically, any process "like" arc can use autoplans to upload test/lint/etc results. In practice, probably only `arc` will ever use this, but I think it's still quite a bit cleaner than the alternative despite all the generality. Workflow is basically: - `arc` creates a diff. - `arc` calls `harbormaster.queryautotargets`, passing the diff PHID and saying "I have some lint and unit results I want to stick on this thing". - Harbormaster builds the plan, steps, and targets (if any of them don't already exist), and hands back the target PHIDs so `arc` has a completely standard-looking place to put results. - `arc` uploads the test results to the right targets, as though Harbormaster had asked it to run unit/lint in the first place. (This doesn't actually do any of that yet, just sets things up.) I'll maybe doc turn that ^^^^^^ into a doc for posterity since I think it's hard to guess what an "autotarget" is, but I'm going to grab some lunch first. Test Plan: - Added unit tests to make sure we can build these things properly. - Used `harbormaster.queryautotargets` to build autotargets for a bunch of diffs. - Verified targets come up in "waiting for message" state. - Verified plans and steps are not editable. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T8095 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13345
2015-06-21 18:04:21 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildArcanistAutoplan' => 'HarbormasterBuildAutoplan',
'HarbormasterBuildArtifact' => array(
'HarbormasterDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
),
Add `harbormaster.createartifact` Summary: Ref T8659. In the general case, this eventually allows build processes to do things like: - Upload build results (like a ".app" or ".exe" or other binary). - Pass complex results between build steps (e.g., build step A does something hard and build step B uses it to do something else). Today, we're a long way away from having the infrastructure for that. However, it is useful to let third party build processes (like Jenkins) upload URIs that link back to the external build results. This adds `harbormaster.createartifact` so they can do that. The only useful thing to do with this method today is have your Jenkins build do this: params = array( "uri": "https://jenkins.mycompany.com/build/23923/details/", "name": "View Build Results in Jenkins", "ui.external": true, ); harbormaster.createartifact(target, 'uri', params); Then (after the next diff) we'll show a link in Differential and a prominent link in Harbormaster. I didn't actually do the UI stuff in this diff since it's already pretty big. This change moves a lot of code around, too: - Adds PHIDs to artifacts. - It modularizes build artifact types (currently "file", "host" and "URI"). - It formalizes build artifact parameters and construction: - This lets me generate usable documentation about how to create artifacts. - This prevents users from doing dangerous or policy-violating things. - It does some other general modernization. Test Plan: {F715633} {F715634} Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T8659 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13900
2015-08-15 16:28:56 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildArtifactPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'HarbormasterBuildArtifactQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
Add "Autoplans" to Harbormaster Summary: Ref T8095. Two general problems: - I want Harbormaster to own all lint and unit test results. - I don't want users to have to configure anything for `arc` to keep working automatically. These are in conflict because generic lint/unit test ownership in Harbormaster requires that build targets exist which we can attach build results to. However, we can't currently create build targets on demand: Harbormaster assumes it is responsible for creating targets, then running code or making third-party service calls to actually run the builds. I considered two broad approaches to let `arc` push results into Harbormaster without requiring administrators to configure some kind of "arc results" build plan: # Add magic target PHIDs like `PHID-MAGIC-this-is-really-arc-unit`. # Add new code to build real targets with real PHIDs. (1) is probably a bit less work to get off the ground, but I think it's worse overall and very likely to create more problems in the long run. I particularly worry that it will lead to a small amount of special casing in a very large number of places, which seems more fragile. (2) is more work upfront but I think does a better job of putting all the special casing in one place that we can, e.g., more reasonably unit test, and letting the rest of the code rarely/never care about this case since it's just dealing with normal plans/steps/targets as far as it can tell. This diff introduces "autoplans", which are source templates for plans/steps. This let us "push" these targets into Harbormaster. Hypthetically, any process "like" arc can use autoplans to upload test/lint/etc results. In practice, probably only `arc` will ever use this, but I think it's still quite a bit cleaner than the alternative despite all the generality. Workflow is basically: - `arc` creates a diff. - `arc` calls `harbormaster.queryautotargets`, passing the diff PHID and saying "I have some lint and unit results I want to stick on this thing". - Harbormaster builds the plan, steps, and targets (if any of them don't already exist), and hands back the target PHIDs so `arc` has a completely standard-looking place to put results. - `arc` uploads the test results to the right targets, as though Harbormaster had asked it to run unit/lint in the first place. (This doesn't actually do any of that yet, just sets things up.) I'll maybe doc turn that ^^^^^^ into a doc for posterity since I think it's hard to guess what an "autotarget" is, but I'm going to grab some lunch first. Test Plan: - Added unit tests to make sure we can build these things properly. - Used `harbormaster.queryautotargets` to build autotargets for a bunch of diffs. - Verified targets come up in "waiting for message" state. - Verified plans and steps are not editable. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T8095 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13345
2015-06-21 18:04:21 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildAutoplan' => 'Phobject',
'HarbormasterBuildCommand' => 'HarbormasterDAO',
'HarbormasterBuildDependencyDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'HarbormasterBuildEngine' => 'Phobject',
'HarbormasterBuildFailureException' => 'Exception',
'HarbormasterBuildGraph' => 'AbstractDirectedGraph',
'HarbormasterBuildLintMessage' => 'HarbormasterDAO',
'HarbormasterBuildLog' => array(
'HarbormasterDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'HarbormasterBuildLogPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'HarbormasterBuildLogQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'HarbormasterBuildMessage' => array(
'HarbormasterDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
Allow external systems to send messages to build targets Summary: Ref T1049. Allows external systems to send a message to a build target. The primary intended use case is: - You make an HTTP request to Jenkins. - The build goes into a "waiting" state. - Later, Jenkins calls `harbormaster.sendmessage` to report that the target passed or failed. - The build continues as appropriate. This is deceptively complicated because: - There are a lot of race concerns. We might get a message back from an external system before it even responds to the request we made. We want to make sure we process these messages no matter when we receive them. - These messages need to be sent to a build target (vs a build or buildable) because we'll get into trouble with parallelization later on otherwise (Jenkins is told to do 3 builds; we can't tell which ones failed or what overall state is unless the message are sent to targets). - I initially thought about implementing this as a separate "Wait for a response from an external system" build step. This gets a lot more complicated for users once we do parallelization, though. Particularly, in the case where you've told Jenkins to do 3 builds, the three "wait" steps need to know which target they're waiting for (and jenkins needs to know some unique identifier for each target). So this pretty much boils down to a more complicated, more error-prone version of using target PHIDs. This makes the already-muddy Build UI a bit worse, but it needs a general clarity pass anyway (it's showing way too much uninteresting data, and should show a better summary of results instead). Test Plan: - This doesn't really do anything interesting yet. - Used Conduit to send messages to build plans. - Viewed the messages on the build screen. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8604
2014-03-26 00:11:28 +01:00
),
'HarbormasterBuildMessageQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'HarbormasterBuildPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'HarbormasterBuildPlan' => array(
'HarbormasterDAO',
Transactions - deploy buildTransactionTimeline to remaining applications Summary: Ref T4712. Specifically... - Differential - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Audit - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Repository - one object needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) - Ponder - BONUS BUG FIX - leaving a comment on an answer had a bad redirect URI - both PonderQuestion and PonderAnswer needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on both "history" controllers - left a "TODO" on buildAnswers on the question view controller, which is non-standard and should be re-written eventually - Phortune - BONUS BUG FIX - fix new user "createNewAccount" code to not fatal - PhortuneAccount, PhortuneMerchant, and PhortuneCart needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on Account view, merchant view, and cart view controller - Fund - Legalpad - Nuance - NuanceSource needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Releeph (this product is kind of a mess...) - HACKQUEST - had to manually create an arcanist project to even be able to make a "product" and get started...! - BONUS BUG FIX - make sure to "setName" on product edit - ReleephProject (should be ReleepProduct...?), ReleephBranch, and ReleepRequest needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Harbormaster - HarbormasterBuildable, HarbormasterBuild, HarbormasterBuildPlan, and HarbormasterBuildStep all needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) all over the place Test Plan: foreach application, viewed the timeline(s) and made sure they still rendered Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4712 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10925
2014-12-04 00:35:47 +01:00
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
),
'HarbormasterBuildPlanDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'HarbormasterBuildPlanDefaultEditCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'HarbormasterBuildPlanDefaultViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildPlanEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'HarbormasterBuildPlanPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildPlanQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'HarbormasterBuildPlanSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'HarbormasterBuildPlanTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'HarbormasterBuildPlanTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'HarbormasterBuildQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'HarbormasterBuildRequest' => 'Phobject',
'HarbormasterBuildStep' => array(
'HarbormasterDAO',
Transactions - deploy buildTransactionTimeline to remaining applications Summary: Ref T4712. Specifically... - Differential - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Audit - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Repository - one object needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) - Ponder - BONUS BUG FIX - leaving a comment on an answer had a bad redirect URI - both PonderQuestion and PonderAnswer needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on both "history" controllers - left a "TODO" on buildAnswers on the question view controller, which is non-standard and should be re-written eventually - Phortune - BONUS BUG FIX - fix new user "createNewAccount" code to not fatal - PhortuneAccount, PhortuneMerchant, and PhortuneCart needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on Account view, merchant view, and cart view controller - Fund - Legalpad - Nuance - NuanceSource needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Releeph (this product is kind of a mess...) - HACKQUEST - had to manually create an arcanist project to even be able to make a "product" and get started...! - BONUS BUG FIX - make sure to "setName" on product edit - ReleephProject (should be ReleepProduct...?), ReleephBranch, and ReleepRequest needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Harbormaster - HarbormasterBuildable, HarbormasterBuild, HarbormasterBuildPlan, and HarbormasterBuildStep all needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) all over the place Test Plan: foreach application, viewed the timeline(s) and made sure they still rendered Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4712 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10925
2014-12-04 00:35:47 +01:00
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface',
),
'HarbormasterBuildStepCoreCustomField' => array(
'HarbormasterBuildStepCustomField',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldInterface',
),
'HarbormasterBuildStepCustomField' => 'PhabricatorCustomField',
'HarbormasterBuildStepEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'HarbormasterBuildStepGroup' => 'Phobject',
'HarbormasterBuildStepImplementation' => 'Phobject',
'HarbormasterBuildStepImplementationTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'HarbormasterBuildStepPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildStepQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'HarbormasterBuildStepTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'HarbormasterBuildStepTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'HarbormasterBuildTarget' => array(
'HarbormasterDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'HarbormasterBuildTargetPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildTargetQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'HarbormasterBuildTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'HarbormasterBuildTransactionEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'HarbormasterBuildTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'HarbormasterBuildUnitMessage' => 'HarbormasterDAO',
'HarbormasterBuildViewController' => 'HarbormasterController',
'HarbormasterBuildWorker' => 'HarbormasterWorker',
'HarbormasterBuildable' => array(
'HarbormasterDAO',
Transactions - deploy buildTransactionTimeline to remaining applications Summary: Ref T4712. Specifically... - Differential - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Audit - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Repository - one object needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) - Ponder - BONUS BUG FIX - leaving a comment on an answer had a bad redirect URI - both PonderQuestion and PonderAnswer needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on both "history" controllers - left a "TODO" on buildAnswers on the question view controller, which is non-standard and should be re-written eventually - Phortune - BONUS BUG FIX - fix new user "createNewAccount" code to not fatal - PhortuneAccount, PhortuneMerchant, and PhortuneCart needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on Account view, merchant view, and cart view controller - Fund - Legalpad - Nuance - NuanceSource needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Releeph (this product is kind of a mess...) - HACKQUEST - had to manually create an arcanist project to even be able to make a "product" and get started...! - BONUS BUG FIX - make sure to "setName" on product edit - ReleephProject (should be ReleepProduct...?), ReleephBranch, and ReleepRequest needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Harbormaster - HarbormasterBuildable, HarbormasterBuild, HarbormasterBuildPlan, and HarbormasterBuildStep all needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) all over the place Test Plan: foreach application, viewed the timeline(s) and made sure they still rendered Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4712 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10925
2014-12-04 00:35:47 +01:00
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'HarbormasterBuildableInterface',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
),
'HarbormasterBuildableActionController' => 'HarbormasterController',
'HarbormasterBuildableListController' => 'HarbormasterController',
'HarbormasterBuildablePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildableQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'HarbormasterBuildableSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'HarbormasterBuildableTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'HarbormasterBuildableTransactionEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'HarbormasterBuildableTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterBuildableViewController' => 'HarbormasterController',
'HarbormasterBuiltinBuildStepGroup' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepGroup',
'HarbormasterCommandBuildStepImplementation' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepImplementation',
'HarbormasterConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterController' => 'PhabricatorController',
Add `harbormaster.createartifact` Summary: Ref T8659. In the general case, this eventually allows build processes to do things like: - Upload build results (like a ".app" or ".exe" or other binary). - Pass complex results between build steps (e.g., build step A does something hard and build step B uses it to do something else). Today, we're a long way away from having the infrastructure for that. However, it is useful to let third party build processes (like Jenkins) upload URIs that link back to the external build results. This adds `harbormaster.createartifact` so they can do that. The only useful thing to do with this method today is have your Jenkins build do this: params = array( "uri": "https://jenkins.mycompany.com/build/23923/details/", "name": "View Build Results in Jenkins", "ui.external": true, ); harbormaster.createartifact(target, 'uri', params); Then (after the next diff) we'll show a link in Differential and a prominent link in Harbormaster. I didn't actually do the UI stuff in this diff since it's already pretty big. This change moves a lot of code around, too: - Adds PHIDs to artifacts. - It modularizes build artifact types (currently "file", "host" and "URI"). - It formalizes build artifact parameters and construction: - This lets me generate usable documentation about how to create artifacts. - This prevents users from doing dangerous or policy-violating things. - It does some other general modernization. Test Plan: {F715633} {F715634} Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T8659 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13900
2015-08-15 16:28:56 +02:00
'HarbormasterCreateArtifactConduitAPIMethod' => 'HarbormasterConduitAPIMethod',
'HarbormasterCreatePlansCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
Remove PHID database, add Harbormaster database Summary: - We currently write every PHID we generate to a table. This was motivated by two concerns: - **Understanding Data**: At Facebook, the data was sometimes kind of a mess. You could look at a random user in the ID tool and see 9000 assocs with random binary data attached to them, pointing at a zillion other objects with no idea how any of it got there. I originally created this table to have a canonical source of truth about PHID basics, at least. In practice, our data model has been really tidy and consistent, and we don't use any of the auxiliary data in this table (or even write it). The handle abstraction is powerful and covers essentially all of the useful data in the app, and we have human-readable types in the keys. So I don't think we have a real need here, and this table isn't serving it if we do. - **Uniqueness**: With a unique key, we can be sure they're unique, even if we get astronomically unlucky and get a collision. But every table we use them in has a unique key anyway. So we actually get pretty much nothing here, except maybe some vague guarantee that we won't reallocate a key later if the original object is deleted. But it's hard to imagine any install will ever have a collision, given that the key space is 36^20 per object type. - We also currently use PHIDs and Users in tests sometimes. This is silly and can break (see D2461). - Drop the PHID database. - Introduce a "Harbormaster" database (the eventual CI tool, after Drydock). - Add a scratch table to the Harbormaster database for doing unit test meta-tests. - Now, PHID generation does no writes, and unit tests are isolated from the application. - @csilvers: This should slightly improve the performance of the large query-bound tail in D2457. Test Plan: Ran unit tests. Ran storage upgrade. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: csilvers, aran, nh, edward Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2466
2012-05-20 23:46:01 +02:00
'HarbormasterDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'HarbormasterDrydockBuildStepGroup' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepGroup',
'HarbormasterDrydockCommandBuildStepImplementation' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepImplementation',
'HarbormasterDrydockLeaseArtifact' => 'HarbormasterArtifact',
'HarbormasterExecFuture' => 'Future',
'HarbormasterExternalBuildStepGroup' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepGroup',
Add `harbormaster.createartifact` Summary: Ref T8659. In the general case, this eventually allows build processes to do things like: - Upload build results (like a ".app" or ".exe" or other binary). - Pass complex results between build steps (e.g., build step A does something hard and build step B uses it to do something else). Today, we're a long way away from having the infrastructure for that. However, it is useful to let third party build processes (like Jenkins) upload URIs that link back to the external build results. This adds `harbormaster.createartifact` so they can do that. The only useful thing to do with this method today is have your Jenkins build do this: params = array( "uri": "https://jenkins.mycompany.com/build/23923/details/", "name": "View Build Results in Jenkins", "ui.external": true, ); harbormaster.createartifact(target, 'uri', params); Then (after the next diff) we'll show a link in Differential and a prominent link in Harbormaster. I didn't actually do the UI stuff in this diff since it's already pretty big. This change moves a lot of code around, too: - Adds PHIDs to artifacts. - It modularizes build artifact types (currently "file", "host" and "URI"). - It formalizes build artifact parameters and construction: - This lets me generate usable documentation about how to create artifacts. - This prevents users from doing dangerous or policy-violating things. - It does some other general modernization. Test Plan: {F715633} {F715634} Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T8659 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13900
2015-08-15 16:28:56 +02:00
'HarbormasterFileArtifact' => 'HarbormasterArtifact',
'HarbormasterHTTPRequestBuildStepImplementation' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepImplementation',
'HarbormasterHostArtifact' => 'HarbormasterDrydockLeaseArtifact',
'HarbormasterLeaseHostBuildStepImplementation' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepImplementation',
'HarbormasterLeaseWorkingCopyBuildStepImplementation' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepImplementation',
'HarbormasterLintMessagesController' => 'HarbormasterController',
'HarbormasterLintPropertyView' => 'AphrontView',
'HarbormasterManagementBuildWorkflow' => 'HarbormasterManagementWorkflow',
'HarbormasterManagementUpdateWorkflow' => 'HarbormasterManagementWorkflow',
'HarbormasterManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'HarbormasterMessageType' => 'Phobject',
'HarbormasterObject' => 'HarbormasterDAO',
'HarbormasterOtherBuildStepGroup' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepGroup',
'HarbormasterPlanController' => 'HarbormasterController',
'HarbormasterPlanDisableController' => 'HarbormasterPlanController',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterPlanEditController' => 'HarbormasterPlanController',
'HarbormasterPlanListController' => 'HarbormasterPlanController',
'HarbormasterPlanRunController' => 'HarbormasterController',
Harbormaster v(-2) Summary: Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together: - **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc. - `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically. - `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists. - `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them. - `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit. - `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues. - `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems. - `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages. - `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence. This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are: 1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me. 2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall. The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs. Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis Maniphest Tasks: T1049 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
2013-10-23 00:01:06 +02:00
'HarbormasterPlanViewController' => 'HarbormasterPlanController',
'HarbormasterPrototypeBuildStepGroup' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepGroup',
'HarbormasterPublishFragmentBuildStepImplementation' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepImplementation',
Add "Autoplans" to Harbormaster Summary: Ref T8095. Two general problems: - I want Harbormaster to own all lint and unit test results. - I don't want users to have to configure anything for `arc` to keep working automatically. These are in conflict because generic lint/unit test ownership in Harbormaster requires that build targets exist which we can attach build results to. However, we can't currently create build targets on demand: Harbormaster assumes it is responsible for creating targets, then running code or making third-party service calls to actually run the builds. I considered two broad approaches to let `arc` push results into Harbormaster without requiring administrators to configure some kind of "arc results" build plan: # Add magic target PHIDs like `PHID-MAGIC-this-is-really-arc-unit`. # Add new code to build real targets with real PHIDs. (1) is probably a bit less work to get off the ground, but I think it's worse overall and very likely to create more problems in the long run. I particularly worry that it will lead to a small amount of special casing in a very large number of places, which seems more fragile. (2) is more work upfront but I think does a better job of putting all the special casing in one place that we can, e.g., more reasonably unit test, and letting the rest of the code rarely/never care about this case since it's just dealing with normal plans/steps/targets as far as it can tell. This diff introduces "autoplans", which are source templates for plans/steps. This let us "push" these targets into Harbormaster. Hypthetically, any process "like" arc can use autoplans to upload test/lint/etc results. In practice, probably only `arc` will ever use this, but I think it's still quite a bit cleaner than the alternative despite all the generality. Workflow is basically: - `arc` creates a diff. - `arc` calls `harbormaster.queryautotargets`, passing the diff PHID and saying "I have some lint and unit results I want to stick on this thing". - Harbormaster builds the plan, steps, and targets (if any of them don't already exist), and hands back the target PHIDs so `arc` has a completely standard-looking place to put results. - `arc` uploads the test results to the right targets, as though Harbormaster had asked it to run unit/lint in the first place. (This doesn't actually do any of that yet, just sets things up.) I'll maybe doc turn that ^^^^^^ into a doc for posterity since I think it's hard to guess what an "autotarget" is, but I'm going to grab some lunch first. Test Plan: - Added unit tests to make sure we can build these things properly. - Used `harbormaster.queryautotargets` to build autotargets for a bunch of diffs. - Verified targets come up in "waiting for message" state. - Verified plans and steps are not editable. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T8095 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13345
2015-06-21 18:04:21 +02:00
'HarbormasterQueryAutotargetsConduitAPIMethod' => 'HarbormasterConduitAPIMethod',
'HarbormasterQueryBuildablesConduitAPIMethod' => 'HarbormasterConduitAPIMethod',
'HarbormasterQueryBuildsConduitAPIMethod' => 'HarbormasterConduitAPIMethod',
'HarbormasterRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'HarbormasterRunBuildPlansHeraldAction' => 'HeraldAction',
'HarbormasterSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
Remove PHID database, add Harbormaster database Summary: - We currently write every PHID we generate to a table. This was motivated by two concerns: - **Understanding Data**: At Facebook, the data was sometimes kind of a mess. You could look at a random user in the ID tool and see 9000 assocs with random binary data attached to them, pointing at a zillion other objects with no idea how any of it got there. I originally created this table to have a canonical source of truth about PHID basics, at least. In practice, our data model has been really tidy and consistent, and we don't use any of the auxiliary data in this table (or even write it). The handle abstraction is powerful and covers essentially all of the useful data in the app, and we have human-readable types in the keys. So I don't think we have a real need here, and this table isn't serving it if we do. - **Uniqueness**: With a unique key, we can be sure they're unique, even if we get astronomically unlucky and get a collision. But every table we use them in has a unique key anyway. So we actually get pretty much nothing here, except maybe some vague guarantee that we won't reallocate a key later if the original object is deleted. But it's hard to imagine any install will ever have a collision, given that the key space is 36^20 per object type. - We also currently use PHIDs and Users in tests sometimes. This is silly and can break (see D2461). - Drop the PHID database. - Introduce a "Harbormaster" database (the eventual CI tool, after Drydock). - Add a scratch table to the Harbormaster database for doing unit test meta-tests. - Now, PHID generation does no writes, and unit tests are isolated from the application. - @csilvers: This should slightly improve the performance of the large query-bound tail in D2457. Test Plan: Ran unit tests. Ran storage upgrade. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: csilvers, aran, nh, edward Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2466
2012-05-20 23:46:01 +02:00
'HarbormasterScratchTable' => 'HarbormasterDAO',
'HarbormasterSendMessageConduitAPIMethod' => 'HarbormasterConduitAPIMethod',
'HarbormasterSleepBuildStepImplementation' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepImplementation',
'HarbormasterStepAddController' => 'HarbormasterController',
'HarbormasterStepDeleteController' => 'HarbormasterController',
'HarbormasterStepEditController' => 'HarbormasterController',
'HarbormasterStepViewController' => 'HarbormasterController',
Add "Autoplans" to Harbormaster Summary: Ref T8095. Two general problems: - I want Harbormaster to own all lint and unit test results. - I don't want users to have to configure anything for `arc` to keep working automatically. These are in conflict because generic lint/unit test ownership in Harbormaster requires that build targets exist which we can attach build results to. However, we can't currently create build targets on demand: Harbormaster assumes it is responsible for creating targets, then running code or making third-party service calls to actually run the builds. I considered two broad approaches to let `arc` push results into Harbormaster without requiring administrators to configure some kind of "arc results" build plan: # Add magic target PHIDs like `PHID-MAGIC-this-is-really-arc-unit`. # Add new code to build real targets with real PHIDs. (1) is probably a bit less work to get off the ground, but I think it's worse overall and very likely to create more problems in the long run. I particularly worry that it will lead to a small amount of special casing in a very large number of places, which seems more fragile. (2) is more work upfront but I think does a better job of putting all the special casing in one place that we can, e.g., more reasonably unit test, and letting the rest of the code rarely/never care about this case since it's just dealing with normal plans/steps/targets as far as it can tell. This diff introduces "autoplans", which are source templates for plans/steps. This let us "push" these targets into Harbormaster. Hypthetically, any process "like" arc can use autoplans to upload test/lint/etc results. In practice, probably only `arc` will ever use this, but I think it's still quite a bit cleaner than the alternative despite all the generality. Workflow is basically: - `arc` creates a diff. - `arc` calls `harbormaster.queryautotargets`, passing the diff PHID and saying "I have some lint and unit results I want to stick on this thing". - Harbormaster builds the plan, steps, and targets (if any of them don't already exist), and hands back the target PHIDs so `arc` has a completely standard-looking place to put results. - `arc` uploads the test results to the right targets, as though Harbormaster had asked it to run unit/lint in the first place. (This doesn't actually do any of that yet, just sets things up.) I'll maybe doc turn that ^^^^^^ into a doc for posterity since I think it's hard to guess what an "autotarget" is, but I'm going to grab some lunch first. Test Plan: - Added unit tests to make sure we can build these things properly. - Used `harbormaster.queryautotargets` to build autotargets for a bunch of diffs. - Verified targets come up in "waiting for message" state. - Verified plans and steps are not editable. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T8095 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13345
2015-06-21 18:04:21 +02:00
'HarbormasterTargetEngine' => 'Phobject',
'HarbormasterTargetWorker' => 'HarbormasterWorker',
'HarbormasterTestBuildStepGroup' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepGroup',
'HarbormasterThrowExceptionBuildStep' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepImplementation',
'HarbormasterUIEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
Add `harbormaster.createartifact` Summary: Ref T8659. In the general case, this eventually allows build processes to do things like: - Upload build results (like a ".app" or ".exe" or other binary). - Pass complex results between build steps (e.g., build step A does something hard and build step B uses it to do something else). Today, we're a long way away from having the infrastructure for that. However, it is useful to let third party build processes (like Jenkins) upload URIs that link back to the external build results. This adds `harbormaster.createartifact` so they can do that. The only useful thing to do with this method today is have your Jenkins build do this: params = array( "uri": "https://jenkins.mycompany.com/build/23923/details/", "name": "View Build Results in Jenkins", "ui.external": true, ); harbormaster.createartifact(target, 'uri', params); Then (after the next diff) we'll show a link in Differential and a prominent link in Harbormaster. I didn't actually do the UI stuff in this diff since it's already pretty big. This change moves a lot of code around, too: - Adds PHIDs to artifacts. - It modularizes build artifact types (currently "file", "host" and "URI"). - It formalizes build artifact parameters and construction: - This lets me generate usable documentation about how to create artifacts. - This prevents users from doing dangerous or policy-violating things. - It does some other general modernization. Test Plan: {F715633} {F715634} Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T8659 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13900
2015-08-15 16:28:56 +02:00
'HarbormasterURIArtifact' => 'HarbormasterArtifact',
'HarbormasterUnitMessagesController' => 'HarbormasterController',
'HarbormasterUnitPropertyView' => 'AphrontView',
'HarbormasterUploadArtifactBuildStepImplementation' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepImplementation',
'HarbormasterWaitForPreviousBuildStepImplementation' => 'HarbormasterBuildStepImplementation',
'HarbormasterWorker' => 'PhabricatorWorker',
'HarbormasterWorkingCopyArtifact' => 'HarbormasterDrydockLeaseArtifact',
'HeraldAction' => 'Phobject',
'HeraldActionGroup' => 'HeraldGroup',
'HeraldActionRecord' => 'HeraldDAO',
'HeraldAdapter' => 'Phobject',
'HeraldAlwaysField' => 'HeraldField',
'HeraldAnotherRuleField' => 'HeraldField',
'HeraldApplicationActionGroup' => 'HeraldActionGroup',
'HeraldApplyTranscript' => 'Phobject',
'HeraldBasicFieldGroup' => 'HeraldFieldGroup',
'HeraldCommitAdapter' => array(
'HeraldAdapter',
'HarbormasterBuildableAdapterInterface',
),
2011-03-22 21:22:40 +01:00
'HeraldCondition' => 'HeraldDAO',
'HeraldConditionTranscript' => 'Phobject',
'HeraldContentSourceField' => 'HeraldField',
2011-03-22 21:49:46 +01:00
'HeraldController' => 'PhabricatorController',
2011-03-22 21:22:40 +01:00
'HeraldDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'HeraldDifferentialAdapter' => 'HeraldAdapter',
'HeraldDifferentialDiffAdapter' => 'HeraldDifferentialAdapter',
'HeraldDifferentialRevisionAdapter' => array(
'HeraldDifferentialAdapter',
'HarbormasterBuildableAdapterInterface',
),
'HeraldDisableController' => 'HeraldController',
'HeraldDoNothingAction' => 'HeraldAction',
'HeraldEditFieldGroup' => 'HeraldFieldGroup',
'HeraldEffect' => 'Phobject',
'HeraldEmptyFieldValue' => 'HeraldFieldValue',
'HeraldEngine' => 'Phobject',
'HeraldField' => 'Phobject',
'HeraldFieldGroup' => 'HeraldGroup',
'HeraldFieldTestCase' => 'PhutilTestCase',
'HeraldFieldValue' => 'Phobject',
'HeraldGroup' => 'Phobject',
'HeraldInvalidActionException' => 'Exception',
'HeraldInvalidConditionException' => 'Exception',
'HeraldManageGlobalRulesCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'HeraldManiphestTaskAdapter' => 'HeraldAdapter',
2011-03-22 22:34:38 +01:00
'HeraldNewController' => 'HeraldController',
'HeraldNewObjectField' => 'HeraldField',
'HeraldNotifyActionGroup' => 'HeraldActionGroup',
'HeraldObjectTranscript' => 'Phobject',
'HeraldPholioMockAdapter' => 'HeraldAdapter',
'HeraldPonderQuestionAdapter' => 'HeraldAdapter',
'HeraldPreCommitAdapter' => 'HeraldAdapter',
'HeraldPreCommitContentAdapter' => 'HeraldPreCommitAdapter',
'HeraldPreCommitRefAdapter' => 'HeraldPreCommitAdapter',
'HeraldPreventActionGroup' => 'HeraldActionGroup',
'HeraldProjectsField' => 'HeraldField',
'HeraldRecursiveConditionsException' => 'Exception',
'HeraldRelatedFieldGroup' => 'HeraldFieldGroup',
'HeraldRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'HeraldRepetitionPolicyConfig' => 'Phobject',
'HeraldRule' => array(
'HeraldDAO',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
),
'HeraldRuleController' => 'HeraldController',
'HeraldRuleEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'HeraldRuleListController' => 'HeraldController',
'HeraldRulePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'HeraldRuleQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'HeraldRuleSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'HeraldRuleTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'HeraldRuleTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'HeraldRuleTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'HeraldRuleTranscript' => 'Phobject',
'HeraldRuleTypeConfig' => 'Phobject',
'HeraldRuleViewController' => 'HeraldController',
'HeraldSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'HeraldSelectFieldValue' => 'HeraldFieldValue',
'HeraldSpaceField' => 'HeraldField',
'HeraldSubscribersField' => 'HeraldField',
'HeraldSupportActionGroup' => 'HeraldActionGroup',
'HeraldSupportFieldGroup' => 'HeraldFieldGroup',
2011-03-24 21:49:21 +01:00
'HeraldTestConsoleController' => 'HeraldController',
'HeraldTextFieldValue' => 'HeraldFieldValue',
'HeraldTokenizerFieldValue' => 'HeraldFieldValue',
'HeraldTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'HeraldTranscript' => array(
'HeraldDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'HeraldTranscriptController' => 'HeraldController',
'HeraldTranscriptGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'HeraldTranscriptListController' => 'HeraldController',
'HeraldTranscriptQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'HeraldTranscriptSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'HeraldTranscriptTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'HeraldUtilityActionGroup' => 'HeraldActionGroup',
'Javelin' => 'Phobject',
'JavelinReactorUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'JavelinUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'JavelinViewExampleServerView' => 'AphrontView',
'JavelinViewUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'LegalpadController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'LegalpadCreateDocumentsCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'LegalpadDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'LegalpadDefaultEditCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'LegalpadDefaultViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'LegalpadDocument' => array(
'LegalpadDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'LegalpadDocumentBody' => array(
'LegalpadDAO',
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
),
'LegalpadDocumentCommentController' => 'LegalpadController',
'LegalpadDocumentDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'LegalpadDocumentDoneController' => 'LegalpadController',
'LegalpadDocumentEditController' => 'LegalpadController',
'LegalpadDocumentEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'LegalpadDocumentListController' => 'LegalpadController',
'LegalpadDocumentManageController' => 'LegalpadController',
'LegalpadDocumentQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'LegalpadDocumentRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'LegalpadDocumentSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'LegalpadDocumentSignController' => 'LegalpadController',
'LegalpadDocumentSignature' => array(
'LegalpadDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'LegalpadDocumentSignatureAddController' => 'LegalpadController',
'LegalpadDocumentSignatureListController' => 'LegalpadController',
'LegalpadDocumentSignatureQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'LegalpadDocumentSignatureSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'LegalpadDocumentSignatureVerificationController' => 'LegalpadController',
'LegalpadDocumentSignatureViewController' => 'LegalpadController',
'LegalpadMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver',
'LegalpadObjectNeedsSignatureEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'LegalpadReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'LegalpadRequireSignatureHeraldAction' => 'HeraldAction',
'LegalpadSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'LegalpadSignatureNeededByObjectEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'LegalpadTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'LegalpadTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'LegalpadTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'LegalpadTransactionView' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionView',
'LiskChunkTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'LiskDAO' => 'Phobject',
'LiskDAOSet' => 'Phobject',
'LiskDAOTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'LiskEphemeralObjectException' => 'Exception',
'LiskFixtureTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'LiskIsolationTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'LiskIsolationTestDAO' => 'LiskDAO',
'LiskIsolationTestDAOException' => 'Exception',
'LiskMigrationIterator' => 'PhutilBufferedIterator',
'LiskRawMigrationIterator' => 'PhutilBufferedIterator',
'MacroConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'MacroCreateMemeConduitAPIMethod' => 'MacroConduitAPIMethod',
'MacroQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'MacroConduitAPIMethod',
'ManiphestAssignEmailCommand' => 'ManiphestEmailCommand',
'ManiphestAssigneeDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'ManiphestBatchEditController' => 'ManiphestController',
'ManiphestBulkEditCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'ManiphestClaimEmailCommand' => 'ManiphestEmailCommand',
'ManiphestCloseEmailCommand' => 'ManiphestEmailCommand',
'ManiphestConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'ManiphestConfiguredCustomField' => array(
'ManiphestCustomField',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldInterface',
),
'ManiphestConstants' => 'Phobject',
'ManiphestController' => 'PhabricatorController',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'ManiphestCreateMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorMailReceiver',
'ManiphestCreateTaskConduitAPIMethod' => 'ManiphestConduitAPIMethod',
'ManiphestCustomField' => 'PhabricatorCustomField',
'ManiphestCustomFieldNumericIndex' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldNumericIndexStorage',
'ManiphestCustomFieldStatusParser' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldMonogramParser',
'ManiphestCustomFieldStatusParserTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'ManiphestCustomFieldStorage' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldStorage',
'ManiphestCustomFieldStringIndex' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldStringIndexStorage',
'ManiphestDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'ManiphestDefaultEditCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'ManiphestDefaultViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'ManiphestEditAssignCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
Rough in EditEngine for Maniphest Summary: Ref T9132. I'm going hold this until after the release cut since it isn't going to land completely smoothly, but I think I can prep it today/tomorrow and hopefully get it close enough to working to put in HEAD on Saturday after the push. This adds the basics: new EditEngine, new EditController, and new `maniphest.edit` API endpoint. I put the new stuff at `editpro/` for now until it works a little better. Some notes on stuff this is dropping/changing/not-working-yet: - Preview for the description. I'd rather solve this by putting a "Preview" button on every Remarkup area if we want to retain it. Particularly, it does not generalize to adding custom remarkup fields in its current form. See also T3967. - Per-field policies are no longer enforced. They were never truly enforced anyway (for example, any user who can edit a task has always been able to edit every field via Conduit or email actions or Herald, where Herald supports things), and only really served as a hint to users. I think we can obsolete this by having installs hide/lock these fields instead. This is a desirable outcome for me, since I don't like retaining these policies and the idea of truly enforcing them properly is worrisome. These were originally added for Uber as an onboarding sort of thing. I'll prepare users for this in greater detail in the documentation. - Couple of minor bugs with ordering / defaults / only-one-owner-allowed in this diff that I'll clean up in future diffs before this stuff lands. - I don't have a concrete plan on "Create Similar Task" / "Clone" yet (do you have thoughts? Is this worth trying to do in every application?). I'll probably just mostly mimic the current behavior. Test Plan: I'll vet this more thoroughly in followups, just banged around some tasks for now and created/edited via the API. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14659
2015-12-03 23:32:40 +01:00
'ManiphestEditConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineAPIMethod',
'ManiphestEditEngine' => 'PhabricatorEditEngine',
'ManiphestEditPoliciesCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'ManiphestEditPriorityCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'ManiphestEditProjectsCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'ManiphestEditStatusCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'ManiphestEmailCommand' => 'MetaMTAEmailTransactionCommand',
'ManiphestExcelDefaultFormat' => 'ManiphestExcelFormat',
'ManiphestExcelFormat' => 'Phobject',
'ManiphestExcelFormatTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'ManiphestExportController' => 'ManiphestController',
'ManiphestGetTaskTransactionsConduitAPIMethod' => 'ManiphestConduitAPIMethod',
'ManiphestHovercardEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
'ManiphestInfoConduitAPIMethod' => 'ManiphestConduitAPIMethod',
'ManiphestNameIndex' => 'ManiphestDAO',
'ManiphestNameIndexEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
'ManiphestPriorityConfigOptionType' => 'PhabricatorConfigJSONOptionType',
'ManiphestPriorityEmailCommand' => 'ManiphestEmailCommand',
'ManiphestQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'ManiphestConduitAPIMethod',
'ManiphestQueryStatusesConduitAPIMethod' => 'ManiphestConduitAPIMethod',
'ManiphestRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'ManiphestReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'ManiphestReportController' => 'ManiphestController',
'ManiphestSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'ManiphestSearchConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhabricatorSearchEngineAPIMethod',
Improve Search architecture Summary: The search indexing API has several problems right now: - Always runs in-process. - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it. - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster. - Instead, make the API phid-oriented. - No uniform indexing API. - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird. - Instead, provide a uniform API. - No uniform CLI. - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers. - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing. - Not application-oriented. - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world. - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader. Test Plan: - `bin/search index` - Indexed one revision, one task. - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types. - Indexed `--all`. - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it. - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing. - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing. - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: 20after4, aran Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 23:21:31 +01:00
'ManiphestSearchIndexer' => 'PhabricatorSearchDocumentIndexer',
'ManiphestStatusConfigOptionType' => 'PhabricatorConfigJSONOptionType',
'ManiphestStatusEmailCommand' => 'ManiphestEmailCommand',
'ManiphestSubpriorityController' => 'ManiphestController',
'ManiphestTask' => array(
'ManiphestDAO',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorMentionableInterface',
'PhrequentTrackableInterface',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
'PhabricatorSpacesInterface',
'PhabricatorConduitResultInterface',
),
'ManiphestTaskAssignHeraldAction' => 'HeraldAction',
'ManiphestTaskAssignOtherHeraldAction' => 'ManiphestTaskAssignHeraldAction',
'ManiphestTaskAssignSelfHeraldAction' => 'ManiphestTaskAssignHeraldAction',
'ManiphestTaskAssigneeHeraldField' => 'ManiphestTaskHeraldField',
'ManiphestTaskAuthorHeraldField' => 'ManiphestTaskHeraldField',
'ManiphestTaskAuthorPolicyRule' => 'PhabricatorPolicyRule',
'ManiphestTaskClosedStatusDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'ManiphestTaskDependedOnByTaskEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'ManiphestTaskDependsOnTaskEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'ManiphestTaskDescriptionHeraldField' => 'ManiphestTaskHeraldField',
'ManiphestTaskDetailController' => 'ManiphestController',
'ManiphestTaskEditBulkJobType' => 'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobType',
'ManiphestTaskEditController' => 'ManiphestController',
'ManiphestTaskHasCommitEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'ManiphestTaskHasMockEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'ManiphestTaskHasRevisionEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'ManiphestTaskHeraldField' => 'HeraldField',
'ManiphestTaskHeraldFieldGroup' => 'HeraldFieldGroup',
'ManiphestTaskListController' => 'ManiphestController',
'ManiphestTaskListHTTPParameterType' => 'AphrontListHTTPParameterType',
'ManiphestTaskListView' => 'ManiphestView',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'ManiphestTaskMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver',
'ManiphestTaskOpenStatusDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'ManiphestTaskPHIDResolver' => 'PhabricatorPHIDResolver',
'ManiphestTaskPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'ManiphestTaskPriority' => 'ManiphestConstants',
'ManiphestTaskPriorityDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'ManiphestTaskPriorityHeraldAction' => 'HeraldAction',
'ManiphestTaskPriorityHeraldField' => 'ManiphestTaskHeraldField',
'ManiphestTaskQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'ManiphestTaskResultListView' => 'ManiphestView',
'ManiphestTaskSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'ManiphestTaskStatus' => 'ManiphestConstants',
'ManiphestTaskStatusDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'ManiphestTaskStatusFunctionDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'ManiphestTaskStatusHeraldAction' => 'HeraldAction',
'ManiphestTaskStatusHeraldField' => 'ManiphestTaskHeraldField',
'ManiphestTaskStatusTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'ManiphestTaskTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'ManiphestTaskTitleHeraldField' => 'ManiphestTaskHeraldField',
'ManiphestTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'ManiphestTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'ManiphestTransactionEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
Migrate all Maniphest transaction data to new storage Summary: Ref T2217. This is the risky, hard part; everything after this should be smooth sailing. This is //mostly// clean, except: - The old format would opportunistically combine a comment with some other transaction type if it could. We no longer do that, so: - When migrating, "edit" + "comment" transactions need to be split in two. - When editing now, we should no longer combine these transaction types. - These changes are pretty straightforward and low-impact. - This migration promotes "auxiliary field" data to the new CustomField/StandardField format, so that's not a straight migration either. The formats are very similar, though. Broadly, this takes the same attack that the auth migration did: proxy all the code through to the new storage. `ManiphestTransaction` is now just an API on top of `ManiphestTransactionPro`, which is the new storage format. The two formats are very similar, so this was mostly a straight copy from one table to the other. Test Plan: - Without performing the migration, made a bunch of edits and comments on tasks and verified the new code works correctly. - Droped the test data and performed the migration. - Looked at the resulting data for obvious discrepancies. - Looked at a bunch of tasks and their transaction history. - Used Conduit to pull transaction data. - Edited task description and clicked "View Details" on transaction. - Used batch editor. - Made a bunch more edits. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2217 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7068
2013-09-23 23:25:28 +02:00
'ManiphestTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'ManiphestUpdateConduitAPIMethod' => 'ManiphestConduitAPIMethod',
'ManiphestView' => 'AphrontView',
'MetaMTAEmailTransactionCommand' => 'Phobject',
'MetaMTAEmailTransactionCommandTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'MetaMTAMailReceivedGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'MetaMTAMailSentGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'MetaMTAReceivedMailStatus' => 'Phobject',
'MultimeterContext' => 'MultimeterDimension',
'MultimeterControl' => 'Phobject',
'MultimeterController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'MultimeterDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'MultimeterDimension' => 'MultimeterDAO',
'MultimeterEvent' => 'MultimeterDAO',
'MultimeterEventGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'MultimeterHost' => 'MultimeterDimension',
'MultimeterLabel' => 'MultimeterDimension',
'MultimeterSampleController' => 'MultimeterController',
'MultimeterViewer' => 'MultimeterDimension',
'NuanceConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'NuanceConsoleController' => 'NuanceController',
'NuanceController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'NuanceCreateItemConduitAPIMethod' => 'NuanceConduitAPIMethod',
'NuanceDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'NuanceItem' => array(
'NuanceDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
),
'NuanceItemEditController' => 'NuanceController',
'NuanceItemEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'NuanceItemPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'NuanceItemQuery' => 'NuanceQuery',
'NuanceItemTransaction' => 'NuanceTransaction',
'NuanceItemTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'NuanceItemTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'NuanceItemViewController' => 'NuanceController',
'NuancePhabricatorFormSourceDefinition' => 'NuanceSourceDefinition',
'NuanceQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'NuanceQueue' => array(
'NuanceDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
),
'NuanceQueueDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'NuanceQueueEditController' => 'NuanceController',
'NuanceQueueEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'NuanceQueueListController' => 'NuanceController',
'NuanceQueuePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'NuanceQueueQuery' => 'NuanceQuery',
'NuanceQueueSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'NuanceQueueTransaction' => 'NuanceTransaction',
'NuanceQueueTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'NuanceQueueTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'NuanceQueueViewController' => 'NuanceController',
'NuanceRequestor' => array(
'NuanceDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
),
'NuanceRequestorEditController' => 'NuanceController',
'NuanceRequestorEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'NuanceRequestorPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'NuanceRequestorQuery' => 'NuanceQuery',
'NuanceRequestorSource' => 'NuanceDAO',
'NuanceRequestorTransaction' => 'NuanceTransaction',
'NuanceRequestorTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'NuanceRequestorTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'NuanceRequestorViewController' => 'NuanceController',
'NuanceSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'NuanceSource' => array(
'NuanceDAO',
Transactions - deploy buildTransactionTimeline to remaining applications Summary: Ref T4712. Specifically... - Differential - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Audit - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Repository - one object needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) - Ponder - BONUS BUG FIX - leaving a comment on an answer had a bad redirect URI - both PonderQuestion and PonderAnswer needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on both "history" controllers - left a "TODO" on buildAnswers on the question view controller, which is non-standard and should be re-written eventually - Phortune - BONUS BUG FIX - fix new user "createNewAccount" code to not fatal - PhortuneAccount, PhortuneMerchant, and PhortuneCart needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on Account view, merchant view, and cart view controller - Fund - Legalpad - Nuance - NuanceSource needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Releeph (this product is kind of a mess...) - HACKQUEST - had to manually create an arcanist project to even be able to make a "product" and get started...! - BONUS BUG FIX - make sure to "setName" on product edit - ReleephProject (should be ReleepProduct...?), ReleephBranch, and ReleepRequest needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Harbormaster - HarbormasterBuildable, HarbormasterBuild, HarbormasterBuildPlan, and HarbormasterBuildStep all needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) all over the place Test Plan: foreach application, viewed the timeline(s) and made sure they still rendered Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4712 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10925
2014-12-04 00:35:47 +01:00
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'NuanceSourceActionController' => 'NuanceController',
'NuanceSourceCreateController' => 'NuanceController',
'NuanceSourceDefaultEditCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'NuanceSourceDefaultViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'NuanceSourceDefinition' => 'Phobject',
'NuanceSourceDefinitionTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'NuanceSourceEditController' => 'NuanceController',
'NuanceSourceEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'NuanceSourceListController' => 'NuanceController',
'NuanceSourceManageCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'NuanceSourcePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'NuanceSourceQuery' => 'NuanceQuery',
'NuanceSourceSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'NuanceSourceTransaction' => 'NuanceTransaction',
'NuanceSourceTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'NuanceSourceTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'NuanceSourceViewController' => 'NuanceController',
'NuanceTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'OwnersConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'OwnersEditConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineAPIMethod',
'OwnersPackageReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorMailReplyHandler',
'OwnersQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'OwnersConduitAPIMethod',
'OwnersSearchConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhabricatorSearchEngineAPIMethod',
'PHIDConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'PHIDInfoConduitAPIMethod' => 'PHIDConduitAPIMethod',
'PHIDLookupConduitAPIMethod' => 'PHIDConduitAPIMethod',
'PHIDQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'PHIDConduitAPIMethod',
'PHUI' => 'Phobject',
'PHUIActionPanelExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUIActionPanelView' => 'AphrontTagView',
Make mobile navigation work properly by default in more cases Summary: Fixes T5752. This obsoletes a bunch of old patterns and I'll follow up on those with a big "go do a bunch of mechanical code changes" task. Major goals are: - Don't load named queries multiple times on search pages. - Don't require extra code to get standard navigation right on mobile. - Reduce the amount of boilerplate in ListControllers. - Reduce the amount of boilerplate around navigation/menus in all controllers. Specifically, here's what this does: - The StandardPage is now a smarter/more structured object with `setNavigation()` and `setCrumbs()` methods. More rendering decisions are delayed until the last possible moment. - It uses this to automatically add crumb actions to the application menu. - It uses this to automatically reuse one SearchEngine instead of running queries multiple times. - The new preferred way to build responses is `$this->newPage()` (like `$this->newDialog()`), which has structured methods for adding stuff (`setTitle()`, etc). - SearchEngine exposes a new convenience method so you don't have to do all the controller delegation stuff. - Building menus is generally simpler. Test Plan: - Tested paste list, view, edit, comment, raw controllers for functionality, mobile menu, crumbs, navigation menu. - Edited saved queries. - Tested Differential, Maniphest (no changes). - Verified the paste pages don't run any duplicate NamedQuery queries. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T5752 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14382
2015-11-02 21:06:28 +01:00
'PHUIApplicationMenuView' => 'Phobject',
'PHUIBadgeBoxView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIBadgeExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUIBadgeMiniView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIBadgeView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIBoxExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUIBoxView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIButtonBarExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUIButtonBarView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIButtonExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUIButtonView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUICalendarDayView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUICalendarListView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUICalendarMonthView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUICalendarWidgetView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIColorPalletteExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUICrumbView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUICrumbsView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIDiffInlineCommentDetailView' => 'PHUIDiffInlineCommentView',
'PHUIDiffInlineCommentEditView' => 'PHUIDiffInlineCommentView',
'PHUIDiffInlineCommentRowScaffold' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIDiffInlineCommentTableScaffold' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIDiffInlineCommentUndoView' => 'PHUIDiffInlineCommentView',
'PHUIDiffInlineCommentView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIDiffOneUpInlineCommentRowScaffold' => 'PHUIDiffInlineCommentRowScaffold',
'PHUIDiffRevealIconView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIDiffTableOfContentsItemView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIDiffTableOfContentsListView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIDiffTwoUpInlineCommentRowScaffold' => 'PHUIDiffInlineCommentRowScaffold',
'PHUIDocumentExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUIDocumentSummaryView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIDocumentView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIDocumentViewPro' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIFeedStoryExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUIFeedStoryView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIFormDividerControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'PHUIFormFreeformDateControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'PHUIFormInsetView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIFormLayoutView' => 'AphrontView',
Add a basic multipage form Summary: Ref T2232. Very busy day on IRC so I feel like I've made 20 minutes of progress in 1-minute spurts here, but this adds the basics for a form that can have multiple pages and automatically handle pagination and reading to/from the request, objects and responses. The UIExample is reasonably instructive. Basically, you make a form, add pages to the form, and add controls to the pages. The core flow control looks like this: if ($request->isFormPost()) { $form->readFromRequest($request); // (1) if ($form->isComplete()) { // (2) $response = $form->writeToResponse($response); // (3) // Process result here. // (4) } } else { $form->readFromObject($object); // (5) } The key parts are: # This reads the form state from the request, including reading all the inactive pages. # This tests if all pages are valid and the user just clicked "Done" on the last page. # This produces a "response", which might be writing to an object (for simpler forms) or creating a transaction record (for more complex forms). # Here, we would save the object or apply the transactions. # When the user views the form for the first time, we preload all the values from some object (which might just be empty). Ultimate goal here is to fix repository creation to not be a terrible pit of awfulness. There are probably a lot of rough edges and missing features still, but this seems to not be totally crazy. I'm using two submit buttons with different names which doesn't work on IE7 or something, but we can JS our way out of that if we need to. Test Plan: Paged forward and backward through the form. Reviewers: btrahan, chad Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2232 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6003
2013-05-23 23:39:01 +02:00
'PHUIFormMultiSubmitControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'PHUIFormPageView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIHandleListView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIHandleTagListView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIHandleView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIHeaderView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIIconExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUIIconView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIImageMaskExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUIImageMaskView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIInfoExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUIInfoPanelExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUIInfoPanelView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIInfoView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIListExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUIListItemView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIListView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIListViewTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PHUIObjectBoxView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIObjectItemListExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUIObjectItemListView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIObjectItemView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIPagedFormView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIPagerView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIPinboardItemView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIPinboardView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIPropertyGroupView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIPropertyListExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUIPropertyListView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIRemarkupPreviewPanel' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIRemarkupView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUISpacesNamespaceContextView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUIStatusItemView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIStatusListView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUITagExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUITagView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUITextExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUITextView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUITimelineEventView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUITimelineExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUITimelineView' => 'AphrontView',
'PHUITwoColumnView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUITypeaheadExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PHUIWorkboardView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PHUIWorkpanelView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PassphraseAbstractKey' => 'Phobject',
'PassphraseConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'PassphraseController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PassphraseCredential' => array(
'PassphraseDAO',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorSpacesInterface',
),
'PassphraseCredentialAuthorPolicyRule' => 'PhabricatorPolicyRule',
'PassphraseCredentialConduitController' => 'PassphraseController',
'PassphraseCredentialControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'PassphraseCredentialCreateController' => 'PassphraseController',
'PassphraseCredentialDestroyController' => 'PassphraseController',
'PassphraseCredentialEditController' => 'PassphraseController',
'PassphraseCredentialListController' => 'PassphraseController',
'PassphraseCredentialLockController' => 'PassphraseController',
'PassphraseCredentialPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PassphraseCredentialPublicController' => 'PassphraseController',
'PassphraseCredentialQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PassphraseCredentialRevealController' => 'PassphraseController',
'PassphraseCredentialSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PassphraseCredentialTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PassphraseCredentialTransactionEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PassphraseCredentialTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PassphraseCredentialType' => 'Phobject',
'PassphraseCredentialTypeTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PassphraseCredentialViewController' => 'PassphraseController',
'PassphraseDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PassphraseDefaultEditCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PassphraseDefaultViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PassphraseNoteCredentialType' => 'PassphraseCredentialType',
'PassphrasePasswordCredentialType' => 'PassphraseCredentialType',
'PassphrasePasswordKey' => 'PassphraseAbstractKey',
'PassphraseQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'PassphraseConduitAPIMethod',
'PassphraseRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'PassphraseSSHGeneratedKeyCredentialType' => 'PassphraseSSHPrivateKeyCredentialType',
'PassphraseSSHKey' => 'PassphraseAbstractKey',
'PassphraseSSHPrivateKeyCredentialType' => 'PassphraseCredentialType',
'PassphraseSSHPrivateKeyFileCredentialType' => 'PassphraseSSHPrivateKeyCredentialType',
'PassphraseSSHPrivateKeyTextCredentialType' => 'PassphraseSSHPrivateKeyCredentialType',
'PassphraseSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PassphraseSearchIndexer' => 'PhabricatorSearchDocumentIndexer',
'PassphraseSecret' => 'PassphraseDAO',
'PasteConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'PasteCreateConduitAPIMethod' => 'PasteConduitAPIMethod',
'PasteCreateMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorMailReceiver',
'PasteDefaultEditCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PasteDefaultViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PasteEditConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineAPIMethod',
'PasteEmbedView' => 'AphrontView',
'PasteInfoConduitAPIMethod' => 'PasteConduitAPIMethod',
'PasteMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver',
'PasteQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'PasteConduitAPIMethod',
'PasteReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'PasteSearchConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhabricatorSearchEngineAPIMethod',
'PeopleBrowseUserDirectoryCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PeopleCreateUsersCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PeopleUserLogGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
2011-01-30 01:16:09 +01:00
'Phabricator404Controller' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorAWSConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorAccessControlTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorAccessLog' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorAccessLogConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorAccountSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorActionListView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorActionView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorActivitySettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorAdministratorsPolicyRule' => 'PhabricatorPolicyRule',
'PhabricatorAjaxRequestExceptionHandler' => 'PhabricatorRequestExceptionHandler',
'PhabricatorAlmanacApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorAmazonAuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorOAuth2AuthProvider',
'PhabricatorAnchorView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorAphlictManagementDebugWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorAphlictManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAphlictManagementRestartWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorAphlictManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAphlictManagementStartWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorAphlictManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAphlictManagementStatusWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorAphlictManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAphlictManagementStopWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorAphlictManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAphlictManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAphlictSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorAphrontBarUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PhabricatorAphrontViewTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorAppSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorApplication' => array(
'Phobject',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorApplicationApplicationPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorApplicationConfigurationPanel' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorApplicationConfigurationPanelTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorApplicationDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'PhabricatorApplicationDetailViewController' => 'PhabricatorApplicationsController',
'PhabricatorApplicationEditController' => 'PhabricatorApplicationsController',
'PhabricatorApplicationEditHTTPParameterHelpView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorApplicationEmailCommandsController' => 'PhabricatorApplicationsController',
'PhabricatorApplicationLaunchView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PhabricatorApplicationPanelController' => 'PhabricatorApplicationsController',
'PhabricatorApplicationQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorApplicationSearchController' => 'PhabricatorSearchBaseController',
'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngineTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorApplicationSearchResultView' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorApplicationStatusView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorApplicationTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction' => array(
'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment' => array(
'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentEditController' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionController',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentEditor' => 'PhabricatorEditor',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentHistoryController' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionController',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentQuoteController' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionController',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentRawController' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionController',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentRemoveController' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionController',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionDetailController' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionController',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor' => 'PhabricatorEditor',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionFeedStory' => 'PhabricatorFeedStory',
Add ApplicationTransaction handling for transactions with no effect Summary: When a user submits an action with no effect (like an empty comment, an "abandon" on an already-accepted revision, or a "close, resolved" on a closed task) we want to alert them that their action isn't effective. These warnings fall into two general buckets: - User is submitting two or more actions, and some aren't effective but some are. Prompt them to apply the effective actions only. - A special case of this is where the only effective action is a comment. We provide tailored text ("Post Comment") in this case. - User is submitting one action, which isn't effective. Tell them they're out of luck. - A special case of this is an empty comment. We provide tailored text in this case. By default, the transaction editor throws when transactions have no effect. The caller can then deal with this, or use `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionNoEffectResponse` to provide a standard dialog that gives the user information as above. For cases where we expect transactions to have no effect (notably, "edit" forms) we just continue on no-effect unconditionally. Also fix an issue where new, combined or filtered transactions would not be represented properly in the Ajax response (i.e., return final transactions from `applyTransactions()`), and translate some strings. Test Plan: - Submitted empty and nonempy comments in Macro and Pholio. - Submitted comments with new and existing "@mentions". - Submitted edits in both applications. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T912, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4160
2012-12-12 02:27:40 +01:00
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionNoEffectException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionNoEffectResponse' => 'AphrontProxyResponse',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionPublishWorker' => 'PhabricatorWorker',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorMailReplyHandler',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionResponse' => 'AphrontProxyResponse',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionShowOlderController' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionController',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionStructureException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionTemplatedCommentQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentQuery',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionTextDiffDetailView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionTransactionPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionValidationError' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionValidationException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionValidationResponse' => 'AphrontProxyResponse',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionValueController' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionController',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorApplicationUninstallController' => 'PhabricatorApplicationsController',
'PhabricatorApplicationsApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorApplicationsController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorApplicationsListController' => 'PhabricatorApplicationsController',
'PhabricatorAsanaAuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorOAuth2AuthProvider',
'PhabricatorAsanaConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorAsanaSubtaskHasObjectEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorAsanaTaskHasObjectEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorAuditActionConstants' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorAuditAddCommentController' => 'PhabricatorAuditController',
'PhabricatorAuditApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorAuditCommentEditor' => 'PhabricatorEditor',
'PhabricatorAuditCommitStatusConstants' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorAuditController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorAuditEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorAuditInlineComment' => array(
'Phobject',
'PhabricatorInlineCommentInterface',
),
'PhabricatorAuditListController' => 'PhabricatorAuditController',
'PhabricatorAuditListView' => 'AphrontView',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'PhabricatorAuditMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver',
'PhabricatorAuditManagementDeleteWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorAuditManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAuditManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAuditPreviewController' => 'PhabricatorAuditController',
'PhabricatorAuditReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'PhabricatorAuditStatusConstants' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorAuditTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorAuditTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'PhabricatorAuditTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorAuditTransactionView' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionView',
'PhabricatorAuthAccountView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorAuthApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorAuthAuthFactorPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorAuthAuthProviderPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorAuthConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'PhabricatorAuthConfirmLinkController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
2011-01-26 22:21:12 +01:00
'PhabricatorAuthController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorAuthDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorAuthDisableController' => 'PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigController',
'PhabricatorAuthDowngradeSessionController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorAuthEditController' => 'PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigController',
'PhabricatorAuthFactor' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorAuthFactorConfig' => 'PhabricatorAuthDAO',
'PhabricatorAuthFactorTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorAuthFinishController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorAuthHighSecurityRequiredException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorAuthHighSecurityToken' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorAuthInvite' => array(
'PhabricatorUserDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorAuthInviteAccountException' => 'PhabricatorAuthInviteDialogException',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteAction' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteActionTableView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteDialogException' => 'PhabricatorAuthInviteException',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteEngine' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteInvalidException' => 'PhabricatorAuthInviteDialogException',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteLoginException' => 'PhabricatorAuthInviteDialogException',
'PhabricatorAuthInvitePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteRegisteredException' => 'PhabricatorAuthInviteException',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteVerifyException' => 'PhabricatorAuthInviteDialogException',
'PhabricatorAuthInviteWorker' => 'PhabricatorWorker',
'PhabricatorAuthLinkController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorAuthListController' => 'PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigController',
'PhabricatorAuthLoginController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorAuthLoginHandler' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementCachePKCS8Workflow' => 'PhabricatorAuthManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementLDAPWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorAuthManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementListFactorsWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorAuthManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementRecoverWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorAuthManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementRefreshWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorAuthManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementStripWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorAuthManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementTrustOAuthClientWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorAuthManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementUnlimitWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorAuthManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementUntrustOAuthClientWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorAuthManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementVerifyWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorAuthManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAuthManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorAuthNeedsApprovalController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorAuthNeedsMultiFactorController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorAuthNewController' => 'PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigController',
'PhabricatorAuthOldOAuthRedirectController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
Make password reset emails use one-time tokens Summary: Ref T4398. This code hadn't been touched in a while and had a few crufty bits. **One Time Resets**: Currently, password reset (and similar links) are valid for about 48 hours, but we always use one token to generate them (it's bound to the account). This isn't horrible, but it could be better, and it produces a lot of false positives on HackerOne. Instead, use TemporaryTokens to make each link one-time only and good for no more than 24 hours. **Coupling of Email Verification and One-Time Login**: Currently, one-time login links ("password reset links") are tightly bound to an email address, and using a link verifies that email address. This is convenient for "Welcome" emails, so the user doesn't need to go through two rounds of checking email in order to login, then very their email, then actually get access to Phabricator. However, for other types of these links (like those generated by `bin/auth recover`) there's no need to do any email verification. Instead, make the email verification part optional, and use it on welcome links but not other types of links. **Message Customization**: These links can come out of several workflows: welcome, password reset, username change, or `bin/auth recover`. Add a hint to the URI so the text on the page can be customized a bit to help users through the workflow. **Reset Emails Going to Main Account Email**: Previously, we would send password reset email to the user's primary account email. However, since we verify email coming from reset links this isn't correct and could allow a user to verify an email without actually controlling it. Since the user needs a real account in the first place this does not seem useful on its own, but might be a component in some other attack. The user might also no longer have access to their primary account, in which case this wouldn't be wrong, but would not be very useful. Mitigate this in two ways: - First, send to the actual email address the user entered, not the primary account email address. - Second, don't let these links verify emails: they're just login links. This primarily makes it more difficult for an attacker to add someone else's email to their account, send them a reset link, get them to login and implicitly verify the email by not reading very carefully, and then figure out something interesting to do (there's currently no followup attack here, but allowing this does seem undesirable). **Password Reset Without Old Password**: After a user logs in via email, we send them to the password settings panel (if passwords are enabled) with a code that lets them set a new password without knowing the old one. Previously, this code was static and based on the email address. Instead, issue a one-time code. **Jump Into Hisec**: Normally, when a user who has multi-factor auth on their account logs in, we prompt them for factors but don't put them in high security. You usually don't want to go do high-security stuff immediately after login, and it would be confusing and annoying if normal logins gave you a "YOU ARE IN HIGH SECURITY" alert bubble. However, if we're taking you to the password reset screen, we //do// want to put the user in high security, since that screen requires high security. If we don't do this, the user gets two factor prompts in a row. To accomplish this, we set a cookie when we know we're sending the user into a high security workflow. This cookie makes login finalization upgrade all the way from "partial" to "high security", instead of stopping halfway at "normal". This is safe because the user has just passed a factor check; the only reason we don't normally do this is to reduce annoyance. **Some UI Cleanup**: Some of this was using really old UI. Modernize it a bit. Test Plan: - **One Time Resets** - Used a reset link. - Tried to reuse a reset link, got denied. - Verified each link is different. - **Coupling of Email Verification and One-Time Login** - Verified that `bin/auth`, password reset, and username change links do not have an email verifying URI component. - Tried to tack one on, got denied. - Used the welcome email link to login + verify. - Tried to mutate the URI to not verify, or verify something else: got denied. - **Message Customization** - Viewed messages on the different workflows. They seemed OK. - **Reset Emails Going to Main Account Email** - Sent password reset email to non-primary email. - Received email at specified address. - Verified it does not verify the address. - **Password Reset Without Old Password** - Reset password without knowledge of old one after email reset. - Tried to do that without a key, got denied. - Tried to reuse a key, got denied. - **Jump Into Hisec** - Logged in with MFA user, got factor'd, jumped directly into hisec. - Logged in with non-MFA user, no factors, normal password reset. - **Some UI Cleanup** - Viewed new UI. - **Misc** - Created accounts, logged in with welcome link, got verified. - Changed a username, used link to log back in. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4398 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9252
2014-05-22 19:41:00 +02:00
'PhabricatorAuthOneTimeLoginController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorAuthProvider' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorAuthProviderConfig' => array(
'PhabricatorAuthDAO',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorAuthProviderConfigTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorAuthQueryPublicKeysConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhabricatorAuthConduitAPIMethod',
New Registration Workflow Summary: Currently, registration and authentication are pretty messy. Two concrete problems: - The `PhabricatorLDAPRegistrationController` and `PhabricatorOAuthDefaultRegistrationController` controllers are giant copy/pastes of one another. This is really bad. - We can't practically implement OpenID because we can't reissue the authentication request. Additionally, the OAuth registration controller can be replaced wholesale by config, which is a huge API surface area and a giant mess. Broadly, the problem right now is that registration does too much: we hand it some set of indirect credentials (like OAuth tokens) and expect it to take those the entire way to a registered user. Instead, break registration into smaller steps: - User authenticates with remote service. - Phabricator pulls information (remote account ID, username, email, real name, profile picture, etc) from the remote service and saves it as `PhabricatorUserCredentials`. - Phabricator hands the `PhabricatorUserCredentials` to the registration form, which is agnostic about where they originate from: it can process LDAP credentials, OAuth credentials, plain old email credentials, HTTP basic auth credentials, etc. This doesn't do anything yet -- there is no way to create credentials objects (and no storage patch), but I wanted to get any initial feedback, especially about the event call for T2394. In particular, I think the implementation would look something like this: $profile = $event->getValue('profile') $username = $profile->getDefaultUsername(); $is_employee = is_this_a_facebook_employee($username); if (!$is_employee) { throw new Exception("You are not employed at Facebook."); } $fbid = get_fbid_for_facebook_username($username); $profile->setDefaultEmail($fbid); $profile->setCanEditUsername(false); $profile->setCanEditEmail(false); $profile->setCanEditRealName(false); $profile->setShouldVerifyEmail(true); Seem reasonable? Test Plan: N/A yet, probably fatals. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, codeblock, chad Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, asherkin, nh, wez Maniphest Tasks: T1536, T2394 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4647
2013-06-16 19:13:49 +02:00
'PhabricatorAuthRegisterController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorAuthRevokeTokenController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorAuthSSHKey' => array(
'PhabricatorAuthDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyDeleteController' => 'PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyController',
'PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyEditController' => 'PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyController',
'PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyGenerateController' => 'PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyController',
Add a query/policy layer on top of SSH keys for Almanac Summary: Ref T5833. Currently, SSH keys are associated only with users, and are a bit un-modern. I want to let Almanac Devices have SSH keys so devices in a cluster can identify to one another. For example, with hosted installs, initialization will go something like this: - A request comes in for `company.phacility.com`. - A SiteSource (from D10787) makes a Conduit call to Almanac on the master install to check if `company` is a valid install and pull config if it is. - This call can be signed with an SSH key which identifies a trusted Almanac Device. In the cluster case, a web host can make an authenticated call to a repository host with similar key signing. To move toward this, put a proper Query class on top of SSH key access (this diff). In following diffs, I'll: - Rename `userPHID` to `objectPHID`. - Move this to the `auth` database. - Provide UI for device/key association. An alternative approach would be to build some kind of special token layer in Conduit, but I think that would be a lot harder to manage in the hosting case. This gives us a more direct attack on trusting requests from machines and recognizing machines as first (well, sort of second-class) actors without needing things like fake user accounts. Test Plan: - Added and removed SSH keys. - Added and removed SSH keys from a bot account. - Tried to edit an unonwned SSH key (denied). - Ran `bin/ssh-auth`, got sensible output. - Ran `bin/ssh-auth-key`, got sensible output. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T5833 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10790
2014-11-06 21:37:02 +01:00
'PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorAuthSSHKeyTableView' => 'AphrontView',
Add a query/policy layer on top of SSH keys for Almanac Summary: Ref T5833. Currently, SSH keys are associated only with users, and are a bit un-modern. I want to let Almanac Devices have SSH keys so devices in a cluster can identify to one another. For example, with hosted installs, initialization will go something like this: - A request comes in for `company.phacility.com`. - A SiteSource (from D10787) makes a Conduit call to Almanac on the master install to check if `company` is a valid install and pull config if it is. - This call can be signed with an SSH key which identifies a trusted Almanac Device. In the cluster case, a web host can make an authenticated call to a repository host with similar key signing. To move toward this, put a proper Query class on top of SSH key access (this diff). In following diffs, I'll: - Rename `userPHID` to `objectPHID`. - Move this to the `auth` database. - Provide UI for device/key association. An alternative approach would be to build some kind of special token layer in Conduit, but I think that would be a lot harder to manage in the hosting case. This gives us a more direct attack on trusting requests from machines and recognizing machines as first (well, sort of second-class) actors without needing things like fake user accounts. Test Plan: - Added and removed SSH keys. - Added and removed SSH keys from a bot account. - Tried to edit an unonwned SSH key (denied). - Ran `bin/ssh-auth`, got sensible output. - Ran `bin/ssh-auth-key`, got sensible output. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T5833 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10790
2014-11-06 21:37:02 +01:00
'PhabricatorAuthSSHPublicKey' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorAuthSession' => array(
'PhabricatorAuthDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorAuthSessionEngine' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorAuthSessionGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'PhabricatorAuthSessionQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorAuthSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorAuthStartController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorAuthTemporaryToken' => array(
'PhabricatorAuthDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
Add "temporary tokens" to auth, for SMS codes, TOTP codes, reset codes, etc Summary: Ref T4398. We have several auth-related systems which require (or are improved by) the ability to hand out one-time codes which expire after a short period of time. In particular, these are: - SMS multi-factor: we need to be able to hand out one-time codes for this in order to prove the user has the phone. - Password reset emails: we use a time-based rotating token right now, but we could improve this with a one-time token, so once you reset your password the link is dead. - TOTP auth: we don't need to verify/invalidate keys, but can improve security by doing so. This adds a generic one-time code storage table, and strengthens the TOTP enrollment process by using it. Specifically, you can no longer edit the enrollment form (the one with a QR code) to force your own key as the TOTP key: only keys Phabricator generated are accepted. This has no practical security impact, but generally helps raise the barrier potential attackers face. Followup changes will use this for reset emails, then implement SMS multi-factor. Test Plan: - Enrolled in TOTP multi-factor auth. - Submitted an error in the form, saw the same key presented. - Edited the form with web tools to provide a different key, saw it reject and the server generate an alternate. - Change the expiration to 5 seconds instead of 1 hour, submitted the form over and over again, saw it cycle the key after 5 seconds. - Looked at the database and saw the tokens I expected. - Ran the GC and saw all the 5-second expiry tokens get cleaned up. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4398 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9217
2014-05-20 20:43:45 +02:00
),
'PhabricatorAuthTemporaryTokenGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'PhabricatorAuthTemporaryTokenQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorAuthTerminateSessionController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorAuthTryFactorAction' => 'PhabricatorSystemAction',
'PhabricatorAuthUnlinkController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorAuthValidateController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorAuthenticationConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorAutoEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
'PhabricatorBadgeHasRecipientEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorBadgesApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorBadgesArchiveController' => 'PhabricatorBadgesController',
'PhabricatorBadgesBadge' => array(
'PhabricatorBadgesDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'PhabricatorBadgesCommentController' => 'PhabricatorBadgesController',
'PhabricatorBadgesController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorBadgesCreateCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PhabricatorBadgesDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorBadgesDefaultEditCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PhabricatorBadgesEditController' => 'PhabricatorBadgesController',
'PhabricatorBadgesEditIconController' => 'PhabricatorBadgesController',
'PhabricatorBadgesEditRecipientsController' => 'PhabricatorBadgesController',
'PhabricatorBadgesEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorBadgesIcon' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorBadgesListController' => 'PhabricatorBadgesController',
'PhabricatorBadgesMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver',
'PhabricatorBadgesPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorBadgesQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorBadgesRecipientsListView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PhabricatorBadgesRemoveRecipientsController' => 'PhabricatorBadgesController',
'PhabricatorBadgesReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'PhabricatorBadgesSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhabricatorBadgesSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorBadgesTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorBadgesTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'PhabricatorBadgesTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorBadgesViewController' => 'PhabricatorBadgesController',
'PhabricatorBarePageUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PhabricatorBarePageView' => 'AphrontPageView',
'PhabricatorBaseURISetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorBcryptPasswordHasher' => 'PhabricatorPasswordHasher',
'PhabricatorBinariesSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorBitbucketAuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorOAuth1AuthProvider',
First pass at decoupling Phabricator bot behavior from the protocol it's running on, this pulls the connection, reading, and writing functionalities out of the bot itself and into the adapter. Summary: Ugh, just wrote out a huge message, only to lose it with a fat-fingered ctrl-c. Le sigh. First pass at decoupling the bot from the protocol. Noticeably absent is the command/message coupling. After this design pass I'll give that a go. Could use some advice, thinking that handlers should only create messages (which can be public or private) and not open ended, undefined 'commands'. The problem being that there needs to be some consistant api if we want handlers to be protocol agnostic. Perhaps that's a pipedream, what are your thoughts? Secondly, a few notes, design review requests on the changes i did make: # Config. For now i'm passing config through to the adapter. This was mainly to remain backwards compatible on the config. I was thinking it should probably be namespaced into it's own subobject though to distinguish the adapter config from the bot config. # Adapter selection. This flavor is the one-bot-daemon, config specified protocol version. The upside is that in the future they won't have to run different daemons for this stuff, just have different config, and the door is open for multiple protocol adapters down the road if need be. The downside is that I had to rename the daemon (non-backwards compatible change) and there will need to be some sort of runtime evaluation for instatiation of the adapter. For now I just have a crude switch, but I was thinking of just taking the string they supply as the class name (ala `try { new $clasName(); } catch...`) so as to allow for homegrown adapters, but I wasn't sure how such runtime magic would go over. Also, an alternative would be to make the PhabricatorBot class a non-abstract non-final base class and have the adapters be accompanied by a bot class that just defines their adapter as a property. The upside of which is backwards compatibility (welcome back PhabricatorIRCBot) and perhaps a little bit clearer plugin path for homegrowners. # Logging. You'll notice I commented out two very important logging lines in the irc adapter. This isn't intended to remain commented out, but I'm not sure what the best way is to get logging at this layer. I'm wary of just composing the daemon back down into the adapter (bi-directional object composition makes my skin crawl), but something needs to happen, obviously. Advice? That's it. After the feedback on the above, you can either merge down, or wait until i finish the command/message refactor if you don't think the diff will grow too large. Up to you, this all functions as is. Test Plan: Ran an irc bot, connected, read input, and wrote output including handler integration. Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley CC: aran, Korvin Maniphest Tasks: T2462 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4757
2013-02-06 03:45:20 +01:00
'PhabricatorBot' => 'PhabricatorDaemon',
'PhabricatorBotChannel' => 'PhabricatorBotTarget',
First pass at decoupling Phabricator bot behavior from the protocol it's running on, this pulls the connection, reading, and writing functionalities out of the bot itself and into the adapter. Summary: Ugh, just wrote out a huge message, only to lose it with a fat-fingered ctrl-c. Le sigh. First pass at decoupling the bot from the protocol. Noticeably absent is the command/message coupling. After this design pass I'll give that a go. Could use some advice, thinking that handlers should only create messages (which can be public or private) and not open ended, undefined 'commands'. The problem being that there needs to be some consistant api if we want handlers to be protocol agnostic. Perhaps that's a pipedream, what are your thoughts? Secondly, a few notes, design review requests on the changes i did make: # Config. For now i'm passing config through to the adapter. This was mainly to remain backwards compatible on the config. I was thinking it should probably be namespaced into it's own subobject though to distinguish the adapter config from the bot config. # Adapter selection. This flavor is the one-bot-daemon, config specified protocol version. The upside is that in the future they won't have to run different daemons for this stuff, just have different config, and the door is open for multiple protocol adapters down the road if need be. The downside is that I had to rename the daemon (non-backwards compatible change) and there will need to be some sort of runtime evaluation for instatiation of the adapter. For now I just have a crude switch, but I was thinking of just taking the string they supply as the class name (ala `try { new $clasName(); } catch...`) so as to allow for homegrown adapters, but I wasn't sure how such runtime magic would go over. Also, an alternative would be to make the PhabricatorBot class a non-abstract non-final base class and have the adapters be accompanied by a bot class that just defines their adapter as a property. The upside of which is backwards compatibility (welcome back PhabricatorIRCBot) and perhaps a little bit clearer plugin path for homegrowners. # Logging. You'll notice I commented out two very important logging lines in the irc adapter. This isn't intended to remain commented out, but I'm not sure what the best way is to get logging at this layer. I'm wary of just composing the daemon back down into the adapter (bi-directional object composition makes my skin crawl), but something needs to happen, obviously. Advice? That's it. After the feedback on the above, you can either merge down, or wait until i finish the command/message refactor if you don't think the diff will grow too large. Up to you, this all functions as is. Test Plan: Ran an irc bot, connected, read input, and wrote output including handler integration. Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley CC: aran, Korvin Maniphest Tasks: T2462 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4757
2013-02-06 03:45:20 +01:00
'PhabricatorBotDebugLogHandler' => 'PhabricatorBotHandler',
'PhabricatorBotFeedNotificationHandler' => 'PhabricatorBotHandler',
'PhabricatorBotFlowdockProtocolAdapter' => 'PhabricatorStreamingProtocolAdapter',
'PhabricatorBotHandler' => 'Phobject',
First pass at decoupling Phabricator bot behavior from the protocol it's running on, this pulls the connection, reading, and writing functionalities out of the bot itself and into the adapter. Summary: Ugh, just wrote out a huge message, only to lose it with a fat-fingered ctrl-c. Le sigh. First pass at decoupling the bot from the protocol. Noticeably absent is the command/message coupling. After this design pass I'll give that a go. Could use some advice, thinking that handlers should only create messages (which can be public or private) and not open ended, undefined 'commands'. The problem being that there needs to be some consistant api if we want handlers to be protocol agnostic. Perhaps that's a pipedream, what are your thoughts? Secondly, a few notes, design review requests on the changes i did make: # Config. For now i'm passing config through to the adapter. This was mainly to remain backwards compatible on the config. I was thinking it should probably be namespaced into it's own subobject though to distinguish the adapter config from the bot config. # Adapter selection. This flavor is the one-bot-daemon, config specified protocol version. The upside is that in the future they won't have to run different daemons for this stuff, just have different config, and the door is open for multiple protocol adapters down the road if need be. The downside is that I had to rename the daemon (non-backwards compatible change) and there will need to be some sort of runtime evaluation for instatiation of the adapter. For now I just have a crude switch, but I was thinking of just taking the string they supply as the class name (ala `try { new $clasName(); } catch...`) so as to allow for homegrown adapters, but I wasn't sure how such runtime magic would go over. Also, an alternative would be to make the PhabricatorBot class a non-abstract non-final base class and have the adapters be accompanied by a bot class that just defines their adapter as a property. The upside of which is backwards compatibility (welcome back PhabricatorIRCBot) and perhaps a little bit clearer plugin path for homegrowners. # Logging. You'll notice I commented out two very important logging lines in the irc adapter. This isn't intended to remain commented out, but I'm not sure what the best way is to get logging at this layer. I'm wary of just composing the daemon back down into the adapter (bi-directional object composition makes my skin crawl), but something needs to happen, obviously. Advice? That's it. After the feedback on the above, you can either merge down, or wait until i finish the command/message refactor if you don't think the diff will grow too large. Up to you, this all functions as is. Test Plan: Ran an irc bot, connected, read input, and wrote output including handler integration. Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley CC: aran, Korvin Maniphest Tasks: T2462 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4757
2013-02-06 03:45:20 +01:00
'PhabricatorBotLogHandler' => 'PhabricatorBotHandler',
'PhabricatorBotMacroHandler' => 'PhabricatorBotHandler',
'PhabricatorBotMessage' => 'Phobject',
First pass at decoupling Phabricator bot behavior from the protocol it's running on, this pulls the connection, reading, and writing functionalities out of the bot itself and into the adapter. Summary: Ugh, just wrote out a huge message, only to lose it with a fat-fingered ctrl-c. Le sigh. First pass at decoupling the bot from the protocol. Noticeably absent is the command/message coupling. After this design pass I'll give that a go. Could use some advice, thinking that handlers should only create messages (which can be public or private) and not open ended, undefined 'commands'. The problem being that there needs to be some consistant api if we want handlers to be protocol agnostic. Perhaps that's a pipedream, what are your thoughts? Secondly, a few notes, design review requests on the changes i did make: # Config. For now i'm passing config through to the adapter. This was mainly to remain backwards compatible on the config. I was thinking it should probably be namespaced into it's own subobject though to distinguish the adapter config from the bot config. # Adapter selection. This flavor is the one-bot-daemon, config specified protocol version. The upside is that in the future they won't have to run different daemons for this stuff, just have different config, and the door is open for multiple protocol adapters down the road if need be. The downside is that I had to rename the daemon (non-backwards compatible change) and there will need to be some sort of runtime evaluation for instatiation of the adapter. For now I just have a crude switch, but I was thinking of just taking the string they supply as the class name (ala `try { new $clasName(); } catch...`) so as to allow for homegrown adapters, but I wasn't sure how such runtime magic would go over. Also, an alternative would be to make the PhabricatorBot class a non-abstract non-final base class and have the adapters be accompanied by a bot class that just defines their adapter as a property. The upside of which is backwards compatibility (welcome back PhabricatorIRCBot) and perhaps a little bit clearer plugin path for homegrowners. # Logging. You'll notice I commented out two very important logging lines in the irc adapter. This isn't intended to remain commented out, but I'm not sure what the best way is to get logging at this layer. I'm wary of just composing the daemon back down into the adapter (bi-directional object composition makes my skin crawl), but something needs to happen, obviously. Advice? That's it. After the feedback on the above, you can either merge down, or wait until i finish the command/message refactor if you don't think the diff will grow too large. Up to you, this all functions as is. Test Plan: Ran an irc bot, connected, read input, and wrote output including handler integration. Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley CC: aran, Korvin Maniphest Tasks: T2462 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4757
2013-02-06 03:45:20 +01:00
'PhabricatorBotObjectNameHandler' => 'PhabricatorBotHandler',
'PhabricatorBotSymbolHandler' => 'PhabricatorBotHandler',
'PhabricatorBotTarget' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorBotUser' => 'PhabricatorBotTarget',
First pass at decoupling Phabricator bot behavior from the protocol it's running on, this pulls the connection, reading, and writing functionalities out of the bot itself and into the adapter. Summary: Ugh, just wrote out a huge message, only to lose it with a fat-fingered ctrl-c. Le sigh. First pass at decoupling the bot from the protocol. Noticeably absent is the command/message coupling. After this design pass I'll give that a go. Could use some advice, thinking that handlers should only create messages (which can be public or private) and not open ended, undefined 'commands'. The problem being that there needs to be some consistant api if we want handlers to be protocol agnostic. Perhaps that's a pipedream, what are your thoughts? Secondly, a few notes, design review requests on the changes i did make: # Config. For now i'm passing config through to the adapter. This was mainly to remain backwards compatible on the config. I was thinking it should probably be namespaced into it's own subobject though to distinguish the adapter config from the bot config. # Adapter selection. This flavor is the one-bot-daemon, config specified protocol version. The upside is that in the future they won't have to run different daemons for this stuff, just have different config, and the door is open for multiple protocol adapters down the road if need be. The downside is that I had to rename the daemon (non-backwards compatible change) and there will need to be some sort of runtime evaluation for instatiation of the adapter. For now I just have a crude switch, but I was thinking of just taking the string they supply as the class name (ala `try { new $clasName(); } catch...`) so as to allow for homegrown adapters, but I wasn't sure how such runtime magic would go over. Also, an alternative would be to make the PhabricatorBot class a non-abstract non-final base class and have the adapters be accompanied by a bot class that just defines their adapter as a property. The upside of which is backwards compatibility (welcome back PhabricatorIRCBot) and perhaps a little bit clearer plugin path for homegrowners. # Logging. You'll notice I commented out two very important logging lines in the irc adapter. This isn't intended to remain commented out, but I'm not sure what the best way is to get logging at this layer. I'm wary of just composing the daemon back down into the adapter (bi-directional object composition makes my skin crawl), but something needs to happen, obviously. Advice? That's it. After the feedback on the above, you can either merge down, or wait until i finish the command/message refactor if you don't think the diff will grow too large. Up to you, this all functions as is. Test Plan: Ran an irc bot, connected, read input, and wrote output including handler integration. Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley CC: aran, Korvin Maniphest Tasks: T2462 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4757
2013-02-06 03:45:20 +01:00
'PhabricatorBotWhatsNewHandler' => 'PhabricatorBotHandler',
'PhabricatorBritishEnglishTranslation' => 'PhutilTranslation',
Make SQL patch management DAG-based and provide namespace support Summary: This addresses three issues with the current patch management system: # Two people developing at the same time often pick the same SQL patch number, and then have to go rename it. The system catches this, but it's silly. # Second/third-party developers can't use the same system to manage auxiliary storage they may want to add. # There's no way to build mock databases for unit tests that need to do reads. To resolve these things, you can now name your patches whatever you want and conflicts are just merge conflicts, which are less of a pain to fix than filename conflicts. Dependencies are now a DAG, with implicit dependencies created on the prior patch if no dependencies are specified. Developers can add new concrete subclasses of `PhabricatorSQLPatchList` to add storage management, and define the dependency branchpoint of their patches so they apply in the correct order (although, generally, they should not depend on the mainline patches, presumably). The commands `storage upgrade --namespace test1234` and `storage destroy --namespace test1234` will allow unit tests to build and destroy MySQL storage. A "quickstart" mode allows an upgrade from scratch in ~1200ms. Destruction takes about 200ms. These seem like fairily reasonable costs to actually use in tests. Building from scratch patch-by-patch takes about 6000ms. Test Plan: - Created new databases from scratch with and without quickstart in a separate test namespace. Pointed the webapp at the test namespaces, browsed around, everything looked good. - Compared quickstart and no-quickstart dump states, they're identical except for mysqldump timestamps and a few similar things. - Upgraded a legacy database to the new storage format. - Destroyed / dumped storage. Reviewers: edward, vrana, btrahan, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, nh Maniphest Tasks: T140, T345 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2323
2012-04-30 16:54:00 +02:00
'PhabricatorBuiltinPatchList' => 'PhabricatorSQLPatchList',
'PhabricatorBusyUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
Add a generic multistep Markup cache Summary: The immediate issue this addresses is T1366, adding a rendering cache to Phriction. For wiki pages with code blocks especially, rerendering them each time is expensive. The broader issue is that out markup caches aren't very good right now. They have three major problems: **Problem 1: the data is stored in the wrong place.** We currently store remarkup caches on objects. This means we're always loading it and passing it around even when we don't need it, can't genericize cache management code (e.g., have one simple script to drop/GC caches), need to update authoritative rows to clear caches, and can't genericize rendering code since each object is different. To solve this, I created a dedicated cache database that I plan to move all markup caches to use. **Problem 2: time-variant rules break when cached.** Some rules like `**bold**` are time-invariant and always produce the same output, but some rules like `{Tnnn}` and `@username` are variant and may render differently (because a task was closed or a user is on vacation). Currently, we cache the raw output, so these time-variant rules get locked at whatever values they had when they were first rendered. This is the main reason Phriction doesn't have a cache right now -- I wanted `{Tnnn}` rules to reflect open/closed tasks. To solve this, I split markup into a "preprocessing" phase (which does all the parsing and evaluates all time-invariant rules) and a "postprocessing" phase (which evaluates time-variant rules only). The preprocessing phase is most of the expense (and, notably, includes syntax highlighting) so this is nearly as good as caching the final output. I did most of the work here in D737 / D738, but we never moved to use it in Phabricator -- we currently just do the two operations serially in all cases. This diff splits them apart and caches the output of preprocessing only, so we benefit from caching but also get accurate time-variant rendering. **Problem 3: cache access isn't batched/pipelined optimally.** When we're rendering a list of markup blocks, we should be able to batch datafetching better than we do. D738 helped with this (fetching is batched within a single hunk of markup) and this improves batching on cache access. We could still do better here, but this is at least a step forward. Also fixes a bug with generating a link in the Phriction history interface ($uri gets clobbered). I'm using PHP serialization instead of JSON serialization because Remarkup does some stuff with non-ascii characters that might not survive JSON. Test Plan: - Created a Phriction document and verified that previews don't go to cache (no rows appear in the cache table). - Verified that published documents come out of cache. - Verified that caches generate/regenerate correctly, time-variant rules render properly and old documents hit the right caches. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1366 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2945
2012-07-10 00:20:56 +02:00
'PhabricatorCacheDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorCacheGeneralGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'PhabricatorCacheManagementPurgeWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorCacheManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorCacheManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorCacheMarkupGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'PhabricatorCacheSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhabricatorCacheSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorCacheSpec' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorCacheTTLGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'PhabricatorCaches' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorCachesTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorCalendarApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorCalendarController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorCalendarDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorCalendarEvent' => array(
'PhabricatorCalendarDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorMentionableInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorSpacesInterface',
),
'PhabricatorCalendarEventCancelController' => 'PhabricatorCalendarController',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventCommentController' => 'PhabricatorCalendarController',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventDragController' => 'PhabricatorCalendarController',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventEditController' => 'PhabricatorCalendarController',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventEditIconController' => 'PhabricatorCalendarController',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventEmailCommand' => 'MetaMTAEmailTransactionCommand',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventInvitee' => array(
'PhabricatorCalendarDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorCalendarEventInviteeQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventJoinController' => 'PhabricatorCalendarController',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventListController' => 'PhabricatorCalendarController',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventRSVPEmailCommand' => 'PhabricatorCalendarEventEmailCommand',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventSearchIndexer' => 'PhabricatorSearchDocumentIndexer',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorCalendarEventViewController' => 'PhabricatorCalendarController',
'PhabricatorCalendarHoliday' => 'PhabricatorCalendarDAO',
'PhabricatorCalendarHolidayTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorCalendarIcon' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorCalendarRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'PhabricatorCalendarReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'PhabricatorCalendarSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhabricatorCampfireProtocolAdapter' => 'PhabricatorStreamingProtocolAdapter',
'PhabricatorCelerityApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorCelerityTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorChangeParserTestCase' => 'PhabricatorWorkingCopyTestCase',
'PhabricatorChangesetResponse' => 'AphrontProxyResponse',
'PhabricatorChatLogApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorChatLogChannel' => array(
'PhabricatorChatLogDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorChatLogChannelListController' => 'PhabricatorChatLogController',
'PhabricatorChatLogChannelLogController' => 'PhabricatorChatLogController',
'PhabricatorChatLogChannelQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorChatLogController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorChatLogDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorChatLogEvent' => array(
'PhabricatorChatLogDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorChatLogQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
Add a chunking storage engine for files Summary: Ref T7149. This isn't complete and isn't active yet, but does basically work. I'll shore it up in the next few diffs. The new workflow goes like this: > Client, file.allocate(): I'd like to upload a file with length L, metadata M, and hash H. Then the server returns `upload` (a boolean) and `filePHID` (a PHID). These mean: | upload | filePHID | means | |---|---|---| | false | false | Server can't accept file. | false | true | File data already known, file created from hash. | true | false | Just upload normally. | true | true | Query chunks to start or resume a chunked upload. All but the last case are uninteresting and work like exising uploads with `file.uploadhash` (which we can eventually deprecate). In the last case: > Client, file.querychunks(): Give me a list of chunks that I should upload. This returns all the chunks for the file. Chunks have a start byte, an end byte, and a "complete" flag to indicate that the server already has the data. Then, the client fills in chunks by sending them: > Client, file.uploadchunk(): Here is the data for one chunk. This stuff doesn't work yet or has some caveats: - I haven't tested resume much. - Files need an "isPartial()" flag for partial uploads, and the UI needs to respect it. - The JS client needs to become chunk-aware. - Chunk size is set crazy low to make testing easier. - Some debugging flags that I'll remove soon-ish. - Downloading works, but still streams the whole file into memory. - This storage engine is disabled by default (hardcoded as a unit test engine) because it's still sketchy. - Need some code to remove the "isParital" flag when the last chunk is uploaded. - Maybe do checksumming on chunks. Test Plan: - Hacked up `arc upload` (see next diff) to be chunk-aware and uploaded a readme in 18 32-byte chunks. Then downloaded it. Got the same file back that I uploaded. - File UI now shows some basic chunk info for chunked files: {F336434} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7149 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12060
2015-03-13 19:30:02 +01:00
'PhabricatorChunkedFileStorageEngine' => 'PhabricatorFileStorageEngine',
'PhabricatorClusterConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorCommentEditEngineExtension' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineExtension',
'PhabricatorCommentEditField' => 'PhabricatorEditField',
'PhabricatorCommentEditType' => 'PhabricatorEditType',
'PhabricatorCommitBranchesField' => 'PhabricatorCommitCustomField',
'PhabricatorCommitCustomField' => 'PhabricatorCustomField',
'PhabricatorCommitMergedCommitsField' => 'PhabricatorCommitCustomField',
'PhabricatorCommitRepositoryField' => 'PhabricatorCommitCustomField',
'PhabricatorCommitSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorCommitTagsField' => 'PhabricatorCommitCustomField',
'PhabricatorCommonPasswords' => 'Phobject',
2011-01-24 18:00:29 +01:00
'PhabricatorConduitAPIController' => 'PhabricatorConduitController',
'PhabricatorConduitApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorConduitCertificateToken' => 'PhabricatorConduitDAO',
2011-01-24 18:00:29 +01:00
'PhabricatorConduitConnectionLog' => 'PhabricatorConduitDAO',
'PhabricatorConduitConsoleController' => 'PhabricatorConduitController',
'PhabricatorConduitController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorConduitDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorConduitListController' => 'PhabricatorConduitController',
2011-01-24 18:00:29 +01:00
'PhabricatorConduitLogController' => 'PhabricatorConduitController',
'PhabricatorConduitLogQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorConduitMethodCallLog' => array(
'PhabricatorConduitDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorConduitMethodQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorConduitRequestExceptionHandler' => 'PhabricatorRequestExceptionHandler',
'PhabricatorConduitResultInterface' => 'PhabricatorPHIDInterface',
'PhabricatorConduitSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
Accept Conduit tokens as an authentication mechanism Summary: - Ref T5955. Accept the tokens introduced in D10985 as an authentication token. - Ref T3628. Permit simple `curl`-compatible decoding of parameters. Test Plan: - Ran some sensible `curl` API commands: ``` epriestley@orbital ~/dev/phabricator $ curl -g "http://local.phacility.com/api/user.whoami?api.token=api-f7dfpoyelk4mmz6vxcueb6hcbtbk" ; echo {"result":{"phid":"PHID-USER-cvfydnwadpdj7vdon36z","userName":"admin","realName":"asdf","image":"http:\/\/local.phacility.com\/res\/1410737307T\/phabricator\/3eb28cd9\/rsrc\/image\/avatar.png","uri":"http:\/\/local.phacility.com\/p\/admin\/","roles":["admin","verified","approved","activated"]},"error_code":null,"error_info":null} ``` ``` epriestley@orbital ~/dev/phabricator $ curl -g "http://local.phacility.com/api/differential.query?api.token=api-f7dfpoyelk4mmz6vxcueb6hcbtbk&ids[]=1" ; echo {"result":[{"id":"1","phid":"PHID-DREV-v3a67ixww3ccg5lqbxee","title":"zxcb","uri":"http:\/\/local.phacility.com\/D1","dateCreated":"1418405590","dateModified":"1418405590","authorPHID":"PHID-USER-cvfydnwadpdj7vdon36z","status":"0","statusName":"Needs Review","branch":null,"summary":"","testPlan":"zxcb","lineCount":"6","activeDiffPHID":"PHID-DIFF-pzbtc5rw6pe5j2kxtlr2","diffs":["1"],"commits":[],"reviewers":[],"ccs":[],"hashes":[],"auxiliary":{"phabricator:projects":[],"phabricator:depends-on":[],"organization.sqlmigration":null},"arcanistProjectPHID":null,"repositoryPHID":null,"sourcePath":null}],"error_code":null,"error_info":null} ``` - Ran older-style commands like `arc list` against the local install. - Ran commands via web console. - Added and ran a unit test to make sure nothing is using forbidden parameter names. - Terminated a token and verified it no longer works. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T3628, T5955 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10986
2014-12-15 20:14:41 +01:00
'PhabricatorConduitTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
Add Conduit Tokens to make authentication in Conduit somewhat more sane Summary: Ref T5955. Summary of intended changes: **Improve Granularity of Authorization**: Currently, users have one Conduit Certificate. This isn't very flexible, and means that you can't ever generate an API token with limited permissions or IP block controls (see T6706). This moves toward a world where you can generate multiple tokens, revoke them individually, and assign disparate privileges to them. **Standardize Token Management**: This moves Conduit to work the same way that sessions, OAuth authorizations, and temporary tokens already work, instead of being this crazy bizarre mess. **Make Authentication Faster**: Authentication currently requires a handshake (conduit.connect) to establish a session, like the web UI. This is unnecessary from a security point of view and puts an extra round trip in front of all Conduit activity. Essentially no other API anywhere works like this. **Make Authentication Simpler**: The handshake is complex, and involves deriving hashes. The session is also complex, and creates issues like T4377. Handshake and session management require different inputs. **Make Token Management Simpler**: The certificate is this huge long thing right now, which is not necessary from a security perspective. There are separate Arcanist handshake tokens, but they have a different set of issues. We can move forward to a token management world where neither of these problems exist. **Lower Protocol Barrier**: The simplest possible API client is very complex right now. It should be `curl`. Simplifying authentication is a necessary step toward this. **Unblock T2783**: T2783 is blocked on nodes in the cluster making authenticated API calls to other nodes. This provides a simpler way forward than the handshake mess (or enormous-hack-mess) which would currently be required. Test Plan: - Generated tokens. - Generated tokens for a bot account. - Terminated tokens (and for a bot account). - Terminated all tokens (and for a bot account). - Ran GC and saw it reap all the expired tokens. NOTE: These tokens can not actually be used to authenticate yet! {F249658} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T5955 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10985
2014-12-15 20:14:23 +01:00
'PhabricatorConduitToken' => array(
'PhabricatorConduitDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorConduitTokenController' => 'PhabricatorConduitController',
Add Conduit Tokens to make authentication in Conduit somewhat more sane Summary: Ref T5955. Summary of intended changes: **Improve Granularity of Authorization**: Currently, users have one Conduit Certificate. This isn't very flexible, and means that you can't ever generate an API token with limited permissions or IP block controls (see T6706). This moves toward a world where you can generate multiple tokens, revoke them individually, and assign disparate privileges to them. **Standardize Token Management**: This moves Conduit to work the same way that sessions, OAuth authorizations, and temporary tokens already work, instead of being this crazy bizarre mess. **Make Authentication Faster**: Authentication currently requires a handshake (conduit.connect) to establish a session, like the web UI. This is unnecessary from a security point of view and puts an extra round trip in front of all Conduit activity. Essentially no other API anywhere works like this. **Make Authentication Simpler**: The handshake is complex, and involves deriving hashes. The session is also complex, and creates issues like T4377. Handshake and session management require different inputs. **Make Token Management Simpler**: The certificate is this huge long thing right now, which is not necessary from a security perspective. There are separate Arcanist handshake tokens, but they have a different set of issues. We can move forward to a token management world where neither of these problems exist. **Lower Protocol Barrier**: The simplest possible API client is very complex right now. It should be `curl`. Simplifying authentication is a necessary step toward this. **Unblock T2783**: T2783 is blocked on nodes in the cluster making authenticated API calls to other nodes. This provides a simpler way forward than the handshake mess (or enormous-hack-mess) which would currently be required. Test Plan: - Generated tokens. - Generated tokens for a bot account. - Terminated tokens (and for a bot account). - Terminated all tokens (and for a bot account). - Ran GC and saw it reap all the expired tokens. NOTE: These tokens can not actually be used to authenticate yet! {F249658} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T5955 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10985
2014-12-15 20:14:23 +01:00
'PhabricatorConduitTokenEditController' => 'PhabricatorConduitController',
'PhabricatorConduitTokenHandshakeController' => 'PhabricatorConduitController',
Add Conduit Tokens to make authentication in Conduit somewhat more sane Summary: Ref T5955. Summary of intended changes: **Improve Granularity of Authorization**: Currently, users have one Conduit Certificate. This isn't very flexible, and means that you can't ever generate an API token with limited permissions or IP block controls (see T6706). This moves toward a world where you can generate multiple tokens, revoke them individually, and assign disparate privileges to them. **Standardize Token Management**: This moves Conduit to work the same way that sessions, OAuth authorizations, and temporary tokens already work, instead of being this crazy bizarre mess. **Make Authentication Faster**: Authentication currently requires a handshake (conduit.connect) to establish a session, like the web UI. This is unnecessary from a security point of view and puts an extra round trip in front of all Conduit activity. Essentially no other API anywhere works like this. **Make Authentication Simpler**: The handshake is complex, and involves deriving hashes. The session is also complex, and creates issues like T4377. Handshake and session management require different inputs. **Make Token Management Simpler**: The certificate is this huge long thing right now, which is not necessary from a security perspective. There are separate Arcanist handshake tokens, but they have a different set of issues. We can move forward to a token management world where neither of these problems exist. **Lower Protocol Barrier**: The simplest possible API client is very complex right now. It should be `curl`. Simplifying authentication is a necessary step toward this. **Unblock T2783**: T2783 is blocked on nodes in the cluster making authenticated API calls to other nodes. This provides a simpler way forward than the handshake mess (or enormous-hack-mess) which would currently be required. Test Plan: - Generated tokens. - Generated tokens for a bot account. - Terminated tokens (and for a bot account). - Terminated all tokens (and for a bot account). - Ran GC and saw it reap all the expired tokens. NOTE: These tokens can not actually be used to authenticate yet! {F249658} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T5955 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10985
2014-12-15 20:14:23 +01:00
'PhabricatorConduitTokenQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorConduitTokenTerminateController' => 'PhabricatorConduitController',
'PhabricatorConduitTokensSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorConfigAllController' => 'PhabricatorConfigController',
'PhabricatorConfigApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorConfigCacheController' => 'PhabricatorConfigController',
'PhabricatorConfigCollectorsModule' => 'PhabricatorConfigModule',
'PhabricatorConfigColumnSchema' => 'PhabricatorConfigStorageSchema',
'PhabricatorConfigConfigPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorConfigController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorConfigCoreSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhabricatorConfigDatabaseController' => 'PhabricatorConfigController',
'PhabricatorConfigDatabaseIssueController' => 'PhabricatorConfigDatabaseController',
'PhabricatorConfigDatabaseSchema' => 'PhabricatorConfigStorageSchema',
'PhabricatorConfigDatabaseSource' => 'PhabricatorConfigProxySource',
'PhabricatorConfigDatabaseStatusController' => 'PhabricatorConfigDatabaseController',
'PhabricatorConfigDefaultSource' => 'PhabricatorConfigProxySource',
'PhabricatorConfigDictionarySource' => 'PhabricatorConfigSource',
'PhabricatorConfigEdgeModule' => 'PhabricatorConfigModule',
'PhabricatorConfigEditController' => 'PhabricatorConfigController',
'PhabricatorConfigEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorConfigEntry' => array(
'PhabricatorConfigEntryDAO',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorConfigEntryDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorConfigEntryQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorConfigFileSource' => 'PhabricatorConfigProxySource',
'PhabricatorConfigGroupController' => 'PhabricatorConfigController',
'PhabricatorConfigHTTPParameterTypesModule' => 'PhabricatorConfigModule',
'PhabricatorConfigHistoryController' => 'PhabricatorConfigController',
'PhabricatorConfigIgnoreController' => 'PhabricatorConfigController',
'PhabricatorConfigIssueListController' => 'PhabricatorConfigController',
'PhabricatorConfigIssueViewController' => 'PhabricatorConfigController',
'PhabricatorConfigJSON' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorConfigJSONOptionType' => 'PhabricatorConfigOptionType',
'PhabricatorConfigKeySchema' => 'PhabricatorConfigStorageSchema',
'PhabricatorConfigListController' => 'PhabricatorConfigController',
Add a local configuration source and a non-environmental ENV config source Summary: See discussion in T2221. Before we can move configuration to the database, we have a bootstrapping problem: we need database credentials to live //somewhere// if we can't guess them (and we can only really guess localhost / root / no password). Some options for this are: - Have them live in ENV variables. - These are often somewhat unfamiliar to users. - Scripts would become a huge pain -- you'd have to dump a bunch of stuff into ENV. - Some environments have limited ability to set ENV vars. - SSH is also a pain. - Have them live in a normal config file. - This probably isn't really too awful, but: - Since we deploy/upgrade with git, we can't currently let them edit a file which already exists, or their working copy will become dirty. - So they have to copy or create a file, then edit it. - The biggest issue I have with this is that it will be difficult to give specific, easily-followed directions from Setup. The instructions need to be like "Copy template.conf.php to real.conf.php, then edit these keys: x, y, z". This isn't as easy to follow as "run script Y". - Have them live in an abnormal config file with script access (this diff). - I think this is a little better than a normal config file, because we can tell users 'run phabricator/bin/config set mysql.user phabricator' and such, which is easier to follow than editing a config file. I think this is only a marginal improvement over a normal config file and am open to arguments against this approach, but I think it will be a little easier for users to deal with than a normal config file. In most cases they should only need to store three values in this file -- db user/host/pass -- since once we have those we can bootstrap everything else. Normal config files also aren't going away for more advanced users, we're just offering a simple alternative for most users. This also adds an ENVIRONMENT file as an alternative to PHABRICATOR_ENV. This is just a simple way to specify the environment if you don't have convenient access to env vars. Test Plan: Ran `config set x y`, verified writes. Wrote to ENVIRONMENT, ran `PHABRICATOR_ENV= ./bin/repository`. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, codeblock Reviewed By: codeblock CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2221 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4294
2012-12-30 15:16:15 +01:00
'PhabricatorConfigLocalSource' => 'PhabricatorConfigProxySource',
Increase the power of `bin/config` Summary: Fixes T2254. Make the CLI for config more powerful: - Add validation for `set`. - Add `get`. - Add `list`. - Add `delete`. The `get` command produces fairly verbose JSON to support flags like `--all`, or `--source database` later. The other commands are straightforward. Test Plan: Tested `config set`: $ ./bin/config set Usage Exception: Specify a configuration key and a value to set it to. $ ./bin/config set x Usage Exception: Specify a value to set the key 'x' to. $ ./bin/config set phabricator.base-uri Usage Exception: Specify a value to set the key 'phabricator.base-uri' to. $ ./bin/config set phabricator.base-uri x Usage Exception: Config option 'phabricator.base-uri' is invalid. The URI must start with 'http://' or 'https://'. $ ./bin/config set phabricator.base-uri http://x Usage Exception: Config option 'phabricator.base-uri' is invalid. The URI must contain a dot ('.'), like 'http://example.com/', not just a bare name like 'http://example/'. Some web browsers will not set cookies on domains with no TLD. $ ./bin/config set phabricator.base-uri http://x.com Set 'phabricator.base-uri' in local configuration. $ Tested `config get`: $ ./bin/config get pygments.enabled { "config" : [] } $ ./bin/config set pygments.enabled true Set 'pygments.enabled' in local configuration. $ ./bin/config get pygments.enabled { "config" : [ { "key" : "pygments.enabled", "source" : "local", "value" : true } ] } $ Tested `config delete`: $ ./bin/config delete Usage Exception: Specify a configuration key to delete. $ ./bin/config delete x x Usage Exception: Too many arguments: expected one key. $ ./bin/config delete x Usage Exception: No such configuration key 'x'! Use `config list` to list all keys. $ ./bin/config delete pygments.enabled Deleted 'pygments.enabled' from local configuration. $ ./bin/config delete pygments.enabled Usage Exception: Configuration key 'pygments.enabled' is not set in local configuration! $ Tested `config list`: $ ./bin/config list account.editable account.minimum-password-length amazon-ec2.access-key amazon-ec2.secret-key amazon-s3.access-key amazon-s3.endpoint amazon-s3.secret-key amazon-ses.access-key amazon-ses.secret-key aphront.default-application-configuration-class audit.can-author-close-audit auth.email-domains auth.login-message auth.password-auth-enabled auth.require-email-verification auth.sessions.conduit auth.sessions.web auth.sshkeys.enabled cache.enable-deflate celerity.force-disk-reads celerity.minify celerity.resource-hash celerity.resource-path config.hide config.lock config.mask controller.oauth-registration darkconsole.always-on darkconsole.enabled debug.profile-rate debug.stop-on-redirect differential.allow-reopen differential.allow-self-accept differential.always-allow-close differential.anonymous-access differential.custom-remarkup-block-rules differential.custom-remarkup-rules differential.days-fresh differential.days-stale differential.enable-email-accept differential.expose-emails-prudently differential.field-selector differential.generated-paths differential.require-test-plan-field differential.revision-custom-detail-renderer differential.show-host-field differential.show-test-plan-field differential.whitespace-matters disqus.application-id disqus.application-secret disqus.auth-enabled disqus.auth-permanent disqus.registration-enabled disqus.shortname environment.append-paths events.listeners facebook.application-id facebook.application-secret facebook.auth-enabled facebook.auth-permanent facebook.registration-enabled facebook.require-https-auth feed.http-hooks feed.public files.image-mime-types files.viewable-mime-types gcdaemon.ttl.daemon-logs gcdaemon.ttl.differential-parse-cache gcdaemon.ttl.general-cache gcdaemon.ttl.herald-transcripts gcdaemon.ttl.markup-cache gcdaemon.ttl.task-archive github.application-id github.application-secret github.auth-enabled github.auth-permanent github.registration-enabled google.application-id google.application-secret google.auth-enabled google.auth-permanent google.registration-enabled ldap.activedirectory_domain ldap.anonymous-user-name ldap.anonymous-user-password ldap.auth-enabled ldap.base_dn ldap.hostname ldap.port ldap.real_name_attributes ldap.referrals ldap.search-first ldap.search_attribute ldap.start-tls ldap.username-attribute ldap.version load-libraries log.access.format log.access.path maniphest.custom-fields maniphest.custom-task-extensions-class maniphest.default-priority maniphest.enabled metamta.can-send-as-user metamta.default-address metamta.differential.attach-patches metamta.differential.inline-patches metamta.differential.patch-format metamta.differential.reply-handler metamta.differential.reply-handler-domain metamta.differential.subject-prefix metamta.differential.unified-comment-context metamta.diffusion.attach-patches metamta.diffusion.byte-limit metamta.diffusion.inline-patches metamta.diffusion.reply-handler metamta.diffusion.reply-handler-domain metamta.diffusion.subject-prefix metamta.diffusion.time-limit metamta.domain metamta.herald.show-hints metamta.insecure-auth-with-reply-to metamta.macro.reply-handler-domain metamta.macro.subject-prefix metamta.mail-adapter metamta.maniphest.default-public-author metamta.maniphest.public-create-email metamta.maniphest.reply-handler metamta.maniphest.reply-handler-domain metamta.maniphest.subject-prefix metamta.one-mail-per-recipient metamta.package.reply-handler metamta.package.subject-prefix metamta.pholio.reply-handler-domain metamta.pholio.subject-prefix metamta.placeholder-to-recipient metamta.precedence-bulk metamta.public-replies metamta.re-prefix metamta.recipients.show-hints metamta.reply.show-hints metamta.send-immediately metamta.single-reply-handler-prefix metamta.user-address-format metamta.vary-subjects mysql.configuration-provider mysql.host mysql.implementation mysql.pass mysql.user notification.client-uri notification.debug notification.enabled notification.log notification.pidfile notification.server-uri notification.user phabricator.application-id phabricator.application-secret phabricator.auth-enabled phabricator.auth-permanent phabricator.base-uri phabricator.csrf-key phabricator.env phabricator.mail-key phabricator.oauth-uri phabricator.production-uri phabricator.registration-enabled phabricator.serious-business phabricator.setup phabricator.show-beta-applications phabricator.show-error-callout phabricator.show-stack-traces phabricator.timezone phame.skins phd.log-directory phd.pid-directory phd.start-taskmasters phd.trace phd.verbose phid.external-loaders phpmailer.mailer phpmailer.smtp-host phpmailer.smtp-password phpmailer.smtp-port phpmailer.smtp-protocol phpmailer.smtp-user phriction.enabled policy.allow-public pygments.dropdown-choices pygments.enabled recaptcha.enabled recaptcha.private-key recaptcha.public-key remarkup.enable-embedded-youtube repository.default-local-path search.elastic.host search.engine-selector security.alternate-file-domain security.hmac-key security.require-https sendgrid.api-key sendgrid.api-user storage.default-namespace storage.engine-selector storage.local-disk.path storage.mysql-engine.max-size storage.s3.bucket storage.upload-size-limit style.monospace syntax-highlighter.engine syntax.filemap test.value tokenizer.ondemand translation.override translation.provider uri.allowed-protocols $ Reviewers: btrahan, codeblock Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2254 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4570
2013-01-22 00:27:42 +01:00
'PhabricatorConfigManagementDeleteWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorConfigManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorConfigManagementGetWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorConfigManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorConfigManagementListWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorConfigManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorConfigManagementMigrateWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorConfigManagementWorkflow',
Add a local configuration source and a non-environmental ENV config source Summary: See discussion in T2221. Before we can move configuration to the database, we have a bootstrapping problem: we need database credentials to live //somewhere// if we can't guess them (and we can only really guess localhost / root / no password). Some options for this are: - Have them live in ENV variables. - These are often somewhat unfamiliar to users. - Scripts would become a huge pain -- you'd have to dump a bunch of stuff into ENV. - Some environments have limited ability to set ENV vars. - SSH is also a pain. - Have them live in a normal config file. - This probably isn't really too awful, but: - Since we deploy/upgrade with git, we can't currently let them edit a file which already exists, or their working copy will become dirty. - So they have to copy or create a file, then edit it. - The biggest issue I have with this is that it will be difficult to give specific, easily-followed directions from Setup. The instructions need to be like "Copy template.conf.php to real.conf.php, then edit these keys: x, y, z". This isn't as easy to follow as "run script Y". - Have them live in an abnormal config file with script access (this diff). - I think this is a little better than a normal config file, because we can tell users 'run phabricator/bin/config set mysql.user phabricator' and such, which is easier to follow than editing a config file. I think this is only a marginal improvement over a normal config file and am open to arguments against this approach, but I think it will be a little easier for users to deal with than a normal config file. In most cases they should only need to store three values in this file -- db user/host/pass -- since once we have those we can bootstrap everything else. Normal config files also aren't going away for more advanced users, we're just offering a simple alternative for most users. This also adds an ENVIRONMENT file as an alternative to PHABRICATOR_ENV. This is just a simple way to specify the environment if you don't have convenient access to env vars. Test Plan: Ran `config set x y`, verified writes. Wrote to ENVIRONMENT, ran `PHABRICATOR_ENV= ./bin/repository`. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, codeblock Reviewed By: codeblock CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2221 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4294
2012-12-30 15:16:15 +01:00
'PhabricatorConfigManagementSetWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorConfigManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorConfigManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorConfigModule' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorConfigModuleController' => 'PhabricatorConfigController',
'PhabricatorConfigOption' => array(
'Phobject',
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
),
'PhabricatorConfigOptionType' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorConfigPHIDModule' => 'PhabricatorConfigModule',
'PhabricatorConfigProxySource' => 'PhabricatorConfigSource',
'PhabricatorConfigPurgeCacheController' => 'PhabricatorConfigController',
'PhabricatorConfigRequestExceptionHandlerModule' => 'PhabricatorConfigModule',
Improve top-level exception handling Summary: Fixes T6692. Addresses two main issues: - The write guard would sometimes not get disposed of on exception pathways, generating an unnecessary secondary error which was just a symptom of the original root error. - This was generally confusing and reduced the quality of reports we received because users would report the symptomatic error sometimes instead of the real error. - Instead, reflow the handling so that we always dispose of the write guard if we create one. - If we missed the Controller-level error page generation (normally, a nice page with full CSS, etc), we'd jump straight to Startup-level error page generation (very basic plain text). - A large class of errors occur too early or too late to be handled by Controller-level pages, but many of these errors are not fundamental, and the plain text page is excessively severe. - Provide a mid-level simple HTML error page for errors which can't get full CSS, but also aren't so fundamental that we have no recourse but plain text. Test Plan: Mid-level errors now produce an intentional-looking error page: {F259885} Verified that setup errors still render properly. @chad, feel free to tweak the exception page -- I just did a rough pass on it. Like the setup error stuff, it doesn't have Celerity, so we can't use `{$colors}` and no other CSS will be loaded. Reviewers: chad, btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley, chad Maniphest Tasks: T6692 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11126
2015-01-02 19:49:27 +01:00
'PhabricatorConfigResponse' => 'AphrontStandaloneHTMLResponse',
'PhabricatorConfigSchemaQuery' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorConfigServerSchema' => 'PhabricatorConfigStorageSchema',
'PhabricatorConfigSiteModule' => 'PhabricatorConfigModule',
'PhabricatorConfigSiteSource' => 'PhabricatorConfigProxySource',
'PhabricatorConfigSource' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorConfigStackSource' => 'PhabricatorConfigSource',
'PhabricatorConfigStorageSchema' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorConfigTableSchema' => 'PhabricatorConfigStorageSchema',
'PhabricatorConfigTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorConfigTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorConfigValidationException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorConfigVersionsModule' => 'PhabricatorConfigModule',
'PhabricatorConfigWelcomeController' => 'PhabricatorConfigController',
'PhabricatorConpherenceApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorConpherencePreferencesSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorConpherenceThreadPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorConsoleApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorContentSource' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorContentSourceView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorContributedToObjectEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
2011-01-23 02:48:55 +01:00
'PhabricatorController' => 'AphrontController',
'PhabricatorCookies' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorCoreConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorCountdown' => array(
'PhabricatorCountdownDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface',
'PhabricatorSpacesInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
),
'PhabricatorCountdownApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorCountdownCommentController' => 'PhabricatorCountdownController',
'PhabricatorCountdownController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorCountdownCountdownPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorCountdownDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorCountdownDefaultEditCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PhabricatorCountdownDefaultViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PhabricatorCountdownDeleteController' => 'PhabricatorCountdownController',
'PhabricatorCountdownEditController' => 'PhabricatorCountdownController',
'PhabricatorCountdownEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorCountdownListController' => 'PhabricatorCountdownController',
'PhabricatorCountdownMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver',
'PhabricatorCountdownQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorCountdownRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'PhabricatorCountdownReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'PhabricatorCountdownSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhabricatorCountdownSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorCountdownTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorCountdownTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'PhabricatorCountdownTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorCountdownView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PhabricatorCountdownViewController' => 'PhabricatorCountdownController',
'PhabricatorCredentialsUsedByObjectEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery' => 'PhabricatorPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorCustomField' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldAttachment' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldConfigOptionType' => 'PhabricatorConfigOptionType',
Begin generalizing custom fields Summary: Ref T1703. We have currently have two custom field implementations (Maniphest, Differential) and are about to add a third (User, see D6122). I'd like to generalize custom fields before doing a third implementation, so we don't back ourselves into the ApplicationTransactions corner we have with Maniphest/Differential/Audit. For the most part, the existing custom fields work well and can be directly generalized. There are three specific things I want to improve, though: - Integration with ApplicationSearch: Custom fields aren't indexable. ApplicationSearch is now online and seems stable and good. D5278 provides a template for a backend which can integrate with ApplicationSearch, and ApplicationSearch solves many of the other UI problems implied by exposing custom fields into search (principally, giant pages full of query fields). Generally, I want to provide stronger builtin integration between custom fields and ApplicationSearch. - Integration with ApplicationTransactions: Likewise, custom fields should support more native integrations with ApplicationTransactions, which are also online and seem stable and well designed. - Selection and sorting: Selecting and sorting custom fields is a huge mess right now. I want to move this into config now that we have the UI to support it, and move away from requiring users to subclass a ton of stuff just to add a field. For ApplicationSearch, I've adopted and generalized D5278. For ApplicationTransactions, I haven't made any specific affordances yet. For selection and sorting, I've partially implemented config-based selection and sorting. It will work like this: - We add a new configuration value, like `differential.fields`. In the UI, this is a draggable list of supported fields. Fields can be reordered, and most fields can be disabled. - We load every avialable field to populate this list. New fields will appear at the bottom. - There are two downsides to this approach: - If we add fields in the upstream at a later date, they will appear at the end of the list if an install has customized list order or disabled fields, even if we insert them elsewhere in the upstream. - If we reorder fields in the upstream, the reordering will not be reflected in install which have customized the order/availability. - I think these are both acceptable costs. We only incur them if an admin edits this config, which implies they'll know how to fix it if they want to. - We can fix both of these problems with a straightforward configuration migration if we want to bother. - There are numerous upsides to this approach: - We can delete a bunch of code and replace it with simple configuration. - In general, we don't need the "selector" classes anymore. - Users can enable available-but-disabled fields with one click. - Users can add fields by putting their implementations in `src/extensions/` with zero subclassing or libphutil stuff. - Generally, it's super easy for users to understand. This doesn't actually do anything yet and will probably see some adjustments before anything starts running it. Test Plan: Static checks only, this code isn't reachable yet. Reviewers: chad, seporaitis Reviewed By: chad CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1703 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6147
2013-06-06 23:52:40 +02:00
'PhabricatorCustomFieldDataNotAvailableException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldEditEngineExtension' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineExtension',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldEditField' => 'PhabricatorEditField',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldEditType' => 'PhabricatorEditType',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldHeraldField' => 'HeraldField',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldHeraldFieldGroup' => 'HeraldFieldGroup',
Begin generalizing custom fields Summary: Ref T1703. We have currently have two custom field implementations (Maniphest, Differential) and are about to add a third (User, see D6122). I'd like to generalize custom fields before doing a third implementation, so we don't back ourselves into the ApplicationTransactions corner we have with Maniphest/Differential/Audit. For the most part, the existing custom fields work well and can be directly generalized. There are three specific things I want to improve, though: - Integration with ApplicationSearch: Custom fields aren't indexable. ApplicationSearch is now online and seems stable and good. D5278 provides a template for a backend which can integrate with ApplicationSearch, and ApplicationSearch solves many of the other UI problems implied by exposing custom fields into search (principally, giant pages full of query fields). Generally, I want to provide stronger builtin integration between custom fields and ApplicationSearch. - Integration with ApplicationTransactions: Likewise, custom fields should support more native integrations with ApplicationTransactions, which are also online and seem stable and well designed. - Selection and sorting: Selecting and sorting custom fields is a huge mess right now. I want to move this into config now that we have the UI to support it, and move away from requiring users to subclass a ton of stuff just to add a field. For ApplicationSearch, I've adopted and generalized D5278. For ApplicationTransactions, I haven't made any specific affordances yet. For selection and sorting, I've partially implemented config-based selection and sorting. It will work like this: - We add a new configuration value, like `differential.fields`. In the UI, this is a draggable list of supported fields. Fields can be reordered, and most fields can be disabled. - We load every avialable field to populate this list. New fields will appear at the bottom. - There are two downsides to this approach: - If we add fields in the upstream at a later date, they will appear at the end of the list if an install has customized list order or disabled fields, even if we insert them elsewhere in the upstream. - If we reorder fields in the upstream, the reordering will not be reflected in install which have customized the order/availability. - I think these are both acceptable costs. We only incur them if an admin edits this config, which implies they'll know how to fix it if they want to. - We can fix both of these problems with a straightforward configuration migration if we want to bother. - There are numerous upsides to this approach: - We can delete a bunch of code and replace it with simple configuration. - In general, we don't need the "selector" classes anymore. - Users can enable available-but-disabled fields with one click. - Users can add fields by putting their implementations in `src/extensions/` with zero subclassing or libphutil stuff. - Generally, it's super easy for users to understand. This doesn't actually do anything yet and will probably see some adjustments before anything starts running it. Test Plan: Static checks only, this code isn't reachable yet. Reviewers: chad, seporaitis Reviewed By: chad CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1703 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6147
2013-06-06 23:52:40 +02:00
'PhabricatorCustomFieldImplementationIncompleteException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldIndexStorage' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
Support configuration-driven custom fields Summary: Ref T1702. Ref T3718. There are a couple of things going on here: **PhabricatorCustomFieldList**: I added `PhabricatorCustomFieldList`, which is just a convenience class for dealing with lists of fields. Often, current field code does something like this inline in a Controller: foreach ($fields as $field) { // do some junk } Often, that junk has some slightly subtle implications. Move all of it to `$list->doSomeJunk()` methods (like `appendFieldsToForm()`, `loadFieldsFromStorage()`) to reduce code duplication and prevent errors. This additionally moves an existing list-convenience method there, out of `PhabricatorPropertyListView`. **PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage**: Adds `PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage` for storing custom field data (like "ICQ Handle", "Phone Number", "Desk", "Favorite Flower", etc). **Configuration-Driven Custom Fields**: Previously, I was thinking about doing these with interfaces, but as I thought about it more I started to dislike that approach. Instead, I built proxies into `PhabricatorCustomField`. Basically, this means that fields (like a custom, configuration-driven "Favorite Flower" field) can just use some other Field to actually provide their implementation (like a "standard" field which knows how to render text areas). The previous approach would have involed subclasssing the "standard" field and implementing an interface, but that would mean that every application would have at least two "base" fields and generally just seemed bleh as I worked through it. The cost of this approach is that we need a bunch of `proxy` junk in the base class, but that's a one-time cost and I think it simplifies all the implementations and makes them a lot less magical (e.g., all of the custom fields now extend the right base field classes). **Fixed Some Bugs**: Some of this code hadn't really been run yet and had minor bugs. Test Plan: {F54240} {F54241} {F54242} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1702, T1703, T3718 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6749
2013-08-14 17:10:16 +02:00
'PhabricatorCustomFieldList' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldMonogramParser' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldNotAttachedException' => 'Exception',
Support configuration-driven custom fields Summary: Ref T1702. Ref T3718. There are a couple of things going on here: **PhabricatorCustomFieldList**: I added `PhabricatorCustomFieldList`, which is just a convenience class for dealing with lists of fields. Often, current field code does something like this inline in a Controller: foreach ($fields as $field) { // do some junk } Often, that junk has some slightly subtle implications. Move all of it to `$list->doSomeJunk()` methods (like `appendFieldsToForm()`, `loadFieldsFromStorage()`) to reduce code duplication and prevent errors. This additionally moves an existing list-convenience method there, out of `PhabricatorPropertyListView`. **PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage**: Adds `PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage` for storing custom field data (like "ICQ Handle", "Phone Number", "Desk", "Favorite Flower", etc). **Configuration-Driven Custom Fields**: Previously, I was thinking about doing these with interfaces, but as I thought about it more I started to dislike that approach. Instead, I built proxies into `PhabricatorCustomField`. Basically, this means that fields (like a custom, configuration-driven "Favorite Flower" field) can just use some other Field to actually provide their implementation (like a "standard" field which knows how to render text areas). The previous approach would have involed subclasssing the "standard" field and implementing an interface, but that would mean that every application would have at least two "base" fields and generally just seemed bleh as I worked through it. The cost of this approach is that we need a bunch of `proxy` junk in the base class, but that's a one-time cost and I think it simplifies all the implementations and makes them a lot less magical (e.g., all of the custom fields now extend the right base field classes). **Fixed Some Bugs**: Some of this code hadn't really been run yet and had minor bugs. Test Plan: {F54240} {F54241} {F54242} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1702, T1703, T3718 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6749
2013-08-14 17:10:16 +02:00
'PhabricatorCustomFieldNotProxyException' => 'Exception',
Begin generalizing custom fields Summary: Ref T1703. We have currently have two custom field implementations (Maniphest, Differential) and are about to add a third (User, see D6122). I'd like to generalize custom fields before doing a third implementation, so we don't back ourselves into the ApplicationTransactions corner we have with Maniphest/Differential/Audit. For the most part, the existing custom fields work well and can be directly generalized. There are three specific things I want to improve, though: - Integration with ApplicationSearch: Custom fields aren't indexable. ApplicationSearch is now online and seems stable and good. D5278 provides a template for a backend which can integrate with ApplicationSearch, and ApplicationSearch solves many of the other UI problems implied by exposing custom fields into search (principally, giant pages full of query fields). Generally, I want to provide stronger builtin integration between custom fields and ApplicationSearch. - Integration with ApplicationTransactions: Likewise, custom fields should support more native integrations with ApplicationTransactions, which are also online and seem stable and well designed. - Selection and sorting: Selecting and sorting custom fields is a huge mess right now. I want to move this into config now that we have the UI to support it, and move away from requiring users to subclass a ton of stuff just to add a field. For ApplicationSearch, I've adopted and generalized D5278. For ApplicationTransactions, I haven't made any specific affordances yet. For selection and sorting, I've partially implemented config-based selection and sorting. It will work like this: - We add a new configuration value, like `differential.fields`. In the UI, this is a draggable list of supported fields. Fields can be reordered, and most fields can be disabled. - We load every avialable field to populate this list. New fields will appear at the bottom. - There are two downsides to this approach: - If we add fields in the upstream at a later date, they will appear at the end of the list if an install has customized list order or disabled fields, even if we insert them elsewhere in the upstream. - If we reorder fields in the upstream, the reordering will not be reflected in install which have customized the order/availability. - I think these are both acceptable costs. We only incur them if an admin edits this config, which implies they'll know how to fix it if they want to. - We can fix both of these problems with a straightforward configuration migration if we want to bother. - There are numerous upsides to this approach: - We can delete a bunch of code and replace it with simple configuration. - In general, we don't need the "selector" classes anymore. - Users can enable available-but-disabled fields with one click. - Users can add fields by putting their implementations in `src/extensions/` with zero subclassing or libphutil stuff. - Generally, it's super easy for users to understand. This doesn't actually do anything yet and will probably see some adjustments before anything starts running it. Test Plan: Static checks only, this code isn't reachable yet. Reviewers: chad, seporaitis Reviewed By: chad CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1703 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6147
2013-06-06 23:52:40 +02:00
'PhabricatorCustomFieldNumericIndexStorage' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldIndexStorage',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldSearchEngineExtension' => 'PhabricatorSearchEngineExtension',
Begin generalizing custom fields Summary: Ref T1703. We have currently have two custom field implementations (Maniphest, Differential) and are about to add a third (User, see D6122). I'd like to generalize custom fields before doing a third implementation, so we don't back ourselves into the ApplicationTransactions corner we have with Maniphest/Differential/Audit. For the most part, the existing custom fields work well and can be directly generalized. There are three specific things I want to improve, though: - Integration with ApplicationSearch: Custom fields aren't indexable. ApplicationSearch is now online and seems stable and good. D5278 provides a template for a backend which can integrate with ApplicationSearch, and ApplicationSearch solves many of the other UI problems implied by exposing custom fields into search (principally, giant pages full of query fields). Generally, I want to provide stronger builtin integration between custom fields and ApplicationSearch. - Integration with ApplicationTransactions: Likewise, custom fields should support more native integrations with ApplicationTransactions, which are also online and seem stable and well designed. - Selection and sorting: Selecting and sorting custom fields is a huge mess right now. I want to move this into config now that we have the UI to support it, and move away from requiring users to subclass a ton of stuff just to add a field. For ApplicationSearch, I've adopted and generalized D5278. For ApplicationTransactions, I haven't made any specific affordances yet. For selection and sorting, I've partially implemented config-based selection and sorting. It will work like this: - We add a new configuration value, like `differential.fields`. In the UI, this is a draggable list of supported fields. Fields can be reordered, and most fields can be disabled. - We load every avialable field to populate this list. New fields will appear at the bottom. - There are two downsides to this approach: - If we add fields in the upstream at a later date, they will appear at the end of the list if an install has customized list order or disabled fields, even if we insert them elsewhere in the upstream. - If we reorder fields in the upstream, the reordering will not be reflected in install which have customized the order/availability. - I think these are both acceptable costs. We only incur them if an admin edits this config, which implies they'll know how to fix it if they want to. - We can fix both of these problems with a straightforward configuration migration if we want to bother. - There are numerous upsides to this approach: - We can delete a bunch of code and replace it with simple configuration. - In general, we don't need the "selector" classes anymore. - Users can enable available-but-disabled fields with one click. - Users can add fields by putting their implementations in `src/extensions/` with zero subclassing or libphutil stuff. - Generally, it's super easy for users to understand. This doesn't actually do anything yet and will probably see some adjustments before anything starts running it. Test Plan: Static checks only, this code isn't reachable yet. Reviewers: chad, seporaitis Reviewed By: chad CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1703 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6147
2013-06-06 23:52:40 +02:00
'PhabricatorCustomFieldStorage' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldStringIndexStorage' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldIndexStorage',
'PhabricatorCustomHeaderConfigType' => 'PhabricatorConfigOptionType',
'PhabricatorDaemon' => 'PhutilDaemon',
'PhabricatorDaemonBulkJobListController' => 'PhabricatorDaemonController',
'PhabricatorDaemonBulkJobMonitorController' => 'PhabricatorDaemonController',
'PhabricatorDaemonBulkJobViewController' => 'PhabricatorDaemonController',
'PhabricatorDaemonConsoleController' => 'PhabricatorDaemonController',
'PhabricatorDaemonController' => 'PhabricatorController',
2011-03-15 21:38:14 +01:00
'PhabricatorDaemonDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorDaemonEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
'PhabricatorDaemonLog' => array(
'PhabricatorDaemonDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
2011-03-15 21:38:14 +01:00
'PhabricatorDaemonLogEvent' => 'PhabricatorDaemonDAO',
'PhabricatorDaemonLogEventGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'PhabricatorDaemonLogEventViewController' => 'PhabricatorDaemonController',
'PhabricatorDaemonLogEventsView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorDaemonLogGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'PhabricatorDaemonLogListController' => 'PhabricatorDaemonController',
'PhabricatorDaemonLogListView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorDaemonLogQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
2011-03-15 21:38:14 +01:00
'PhabricatorDaemonLogViewController' => 'PhabricatorDaemonController',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementDebugWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorDaemonManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementLaunchWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorDaemonManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementListWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorDaemonManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementLogWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorDaemonManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementReloadWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorDaemonManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementRestartWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorDaemonManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementStartWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorDaemonManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementStatusWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorDaemonManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementStopWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorDaemonManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorDaemonManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorDaemonOverseerModule' => 'PhutilDaemonOverseerModule',
'PhabricatorDaemonReference' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorDaemonTaskGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'PhabricatorDaemonTasksTableView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorDaemonsApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorDaemonsSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorDailyRoutineTriggerClock' => 'PhabricatorTriggerClock',
'PhabricatorDashboard' => array(
'PhabricatorDashboardDAO',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
),
'PhabricatorDashboardAddPanelController' => 'PhabricatorDashboardController',
'PhabricatorDashboardApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorDashboardArchiveController' => 'PhabricatorDashboardController',
'PhabricatorDashboardController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorDashboardCopyController' => 'PhabricatorDashboardController',
'PhabricatorDashboardDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorDashboardDashboardHasPanelEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorDashboardDashboardPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorDashboardEditController' => 'PhabricatorDashboardController',
'PhabricatorDashboardHistoryController' => 'PhabricatorDashboardController',
'PhabricatorDashboardInstall' => 'PhabricatorDashboardDAO',
'PhabricatorDashboardInstallController' => 'PhabricatorDashboardController',
'PhabricatorDashboardLayoutConfig' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorDashboardListController' => 'PhabricatorDashboardController',
'PhabricatorDashboardManageController' => 'PhabricatorDashboardController',
'PhabricatorDashboardMovePanelController' => 'PhabricatorDashboardController',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanel' => array(
'PhabricatorDashboardDAO',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelArchiveController' => 'PhabricatorDashboardController',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelCoreCustomField' => array(
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelCustomField',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldInterface',
),
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelCustomField' => 'PhabricatorCustomField',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelEditController' => 'PhabricatorDashboardController',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelHasDashboardEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelListController' => 'PhabricatorDashboardController',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelRenderController' => 'PhabricatorDashboardController',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelRenderingEngine' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelSearchApplicationCustomField' => 'PhabricatorStandardCustomField',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelSearchQueryCustomField' => 'PhabricatorStandardCustomField',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelTabsCustomField' => 'PhabricatorStandardCustomField',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelTransactionEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelType' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorDashboardPanelViewController' => 'PhabricatorDashboardController',
'PhabricatorDashboardQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorDashboardQueryPanelType' => 'PhabricatorDashboardPanelType',
'PhabricatorDashboardRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'PhabricatorDashboardRemovePanelController' => 'PhabricatorDashboardController',
'PhabricatorDashboardRenderingEngine' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorDashboardSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhabricatorDashboardSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorDashboardTabsPanelType' => 'PhabricatorDashboardPanelType',
'PhabricatorDashboardTextPanelType' => 'PhabricatorDashboardPanelType',
'PhabricatorDashboardTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorDashboardTransactionEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorDashboardTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorDashboardUninstallController' => 'PhabricatorDashboardController',
'PhabricatorDashboardViewController' => 'PhabricatorDashboardController',
'PhabricatorDataCacheSpec' => 'PhabricatorCacheSpec',
'PhabricatorDataNotAttachedException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorDatabaseSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
Implement a basic version of ApplicationEditor in Paste Summary: Ref T9132. Ref T4768. This is a rough v0 of ApplicationEditor, which replaces the edit workflow in Paste. This mostly looks and works like ApplicationSearch, and is heavily modeled on it. Roughly, we define a set of editable fields and the ApplicationEditor stuff builds everything else. This has no functional changes, except: - I removed "Fork Paste" since I don't think it's particularly useful now that pastes are editable. We could restore it if users miss it. - Subscribers are now editable. - Form field order is a little goofy (this will be fixed in a future diff). - Subscribers and projects are now race-resistant. The race-resistance works like this: instead of submitting just the new value ("subscribers=apple, dog") and doing a set operation ("set subscribers = apple, dog"), we submit the old and new values ("original=apple" + "new=apple, dog") then apply the user's changes as an add + remove ("add=dog", "remove=<none>"). This means that two users who do "Edit Paste" at around the same time and each add or remove a couple of subscribers won't overwrite each other, unless they actually add or remove the exact same subscribers (in which case their edits legitimately conflict). Previously, the last user to save would win, and whatever was in their field would overwrite the prior state, potentially losing the first user's edits. Test Plan: - Created pastes. - Created pastes via API. - Edited pastes. - Edited every field. - Opened a paste in two windows and did project/subscriber edits in each, saved in arbitrary order, had edits respected. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14390
2015-11-03 03:58:32 +01:00
'PhabricatorDatasourceEditField' => 'PhabricatorTokenizerEditField',
'PhabricatorDatasourceEditType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDListEditType',
'PhabricatorDateTimeSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorDebugController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorDefaultRequestExceptionHandler' => 'PhabricatorRequestExceptionHandler',
'PhabricatorDesktopNotificationsSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorDestructionEngine' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorDeveloperConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorDeveloperPreferencesSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorDiffInlineCommentQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionCommentQuery',
'PhabricatorDiffPreferencesSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorDifferenceEngine' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorDifferentialApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorDifferentialConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorDifferentialRevisionTestDataGenerator' => 'PhabricatorTestDataGenerator',
'PhabricatorDiffusionApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorDiffusionConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorDisabledUserController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorDisplayPreferencesSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorDisqusAuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorOAuth2AuthProvider',
'PhabricatorDivinerApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorDoorkeeperApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
2011-02-06 01:57:21 +01:00
'PhabricatorDraft' => 'PhabricatorDraftDAO',
'PhabricatorDraftDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorDrydockApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
Add an assocations-like "Edges" framework Summary: We have a lot of cases where we store object relationships, but it's all kind of messy and custom. Some particular problems: - We go to great lengths to enforce order stability in Differential revisions, but the implementation is complex and inelegant. - Some relationships are stored on-object, so we can't pull the inverses easily. For example, Maniphest shows child tasks but not parent tasks. - I want to add more of these and don't want to continue building custom stuff. - UIs like the "attach stuff to other stuff" UI need custom branches for each object type. - Stuff like "allow commits to close tasks" is notrivial because of nonstandard metadata storage. Provide an association-like "edge" framework to fix these problems. This is nearly identical to associations, with a few differences: - I put edge metadata in a separate table and don't load it by default, to keep edge rows small and allow large metadata if necessary. The on-edge metadata seemed to get abused a lot at Facebook. - I put a 'seq' column on the edges to ensure they have an explicit, stable ordering within a source and type. This isn't actually used anywhere yet, but my first target is attaching commits to tasks for T904. Test Plan: Made a mock page that used Editor and Query. Verified adding and removing edges, overwriting edges, writing and loading edge data, sequence number generation. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, 20after4 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2088
2012-04-05 00:30:21 +02:00
'PhabricatorEdgeConfig' => 'PhabricatorEdgeConstants',
'PhabricatorEdgeConstants' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorEdgeCycleException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorEdgeEditType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDListEditType',
'PhabricatorEdgeEditor' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorEdgeGraph' => 'AbstractDirectedGraph',
Add an assocations-like "Edges" framework Summary: We have a lot of cases where we store object relationships, but it's all kind of messy and custom. Some particular problems: - We go to great lengths to enforce order stability in Differential revisions, but the implementation is complex and inelegant. - Some relationships are stored on-object, so we can't pull the inverses easily. For example, Maniphest shows child tasks but not parent tasks. - I want to add more of these and don't want to continue building custom stuff. - UIs like the "attach stuff to other stuff" UI need custom branches for each object type. - Stuff like "allow commits to close tasks" is notrivial because of nonstandard metadata storage. Provide an association-like "edge" framework to fix these problems. This is nearly identical to associations, with a few differences: - I put edge metadata in a separate table and don't load it by default, to keep edge rows small and allow large metadata if necessary. The on-edge metadata seemed to get abused a lot at Facebook. - I put a 'seq' column on the edges to ensure they have an explicit, stable ordering within a source and type. This isn't actually used anywhere yet, but my first target is attaching commits to tasks for T904. Test Plan: Made a mock page that used Editor and Query. Verified adding and removing edges, overwriting edges, writing and loading edge data, sequence number generation. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, 20after4 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2088
2012-04-05 00:30:21 +02:00
'PhabricatorEdgeQuery' => 'PhabricatorQuery',
'PhabricatorEdgeTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorEdgeType' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorEdgeTypeTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditEngine' => array(
'Phobject',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorEditEngineAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfiguration' => array(
'PhabricatorSearchDAO',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationDefaultCreateController' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineController',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationDefaultsController' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineController',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationDisableController' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineController',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationEditController' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineController',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationEditEngine' => 'PhabricatorEditEngine',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
Allow EditEngine forms to be marked as "edit" forms Summary: Ref T9132. Ref T9908. This attempts to move us forward on answering this question: > Which form gets used when a user clicks "Edit Task"? One answer is "the same form that was used to create the task". There are several problems with that: - The form might not exist anymore. - The user might not have permission to see it. - Some of the fields might be hidden, essentially preventing them from being edited. - We have to store the value somewhere and old tasks won't have a value. - Any instructions on the form probably don't apply to edits. One answer is "force the default, full form". That's not as problematic, but it means we have no ability to create limited access users who see fewer fields. The answer in this diff is: - Forms can be marked as "edit forms". - We take the user to the first edit form they have permission to see, from a master list. This allows you to create several forms like: - Advanced Edit Form (say, all fields -- visible to administrators). - Basic Edit Form (say, no policies -- visible to trusted users). - Noob Edit Form (say, no policies, priorities, or status -- visible to everyone). Then you can give everyone access to "noob", some people access to "basic", and a few people access to "advanced". This might only be part of the answer. In particular, you can still //use// any edit form you can see, so we could do these things in the future: - Give you an option to switch to a different form if you want. - Save the form the task was created with, and use that form by default. If we do pursue those, we can fall back to this behavior if there's a problem with them (e.g., original form doesn't exist or wasn't recorded). There's also no "reorder" UI yet, that'll be coming in the next diff. I'm also going to try to probably make the "create" and "edit" stuff a little more consistent / less weird in a bit. Test Plan: Marked various forms as edit forms or not edit forms, made edits, hit permissions errors, etc. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132, T9908 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14702
2015-12-08 02:11:35 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationIsEditController' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineController',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationListController' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineController',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationLockController' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineController',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationReorderController' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineController',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationSaveController' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineController',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationSortController' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineController',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorEditEngineConfigurationViewController' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineController',
'PhabricatorEditEngineController' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionController',
'PhabricatorEditEngineExtension' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorEditEngineExtensionModule' => 'PhabricatorConfigModule',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditEngineListController' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineController',
'PhabricatorEditEngineQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorEditEngineSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
Implement a basic version of ApplicationEditor in Paste Summary: Ref T9132. Ref T4768. This is a rough v0 of ApplicationEditor, which replaces the edit workflow in Paste. This mostly looks and works like ApplicationSearch, and is heavily modeled on it. Roughly, we define a set of editable fields and the ApplicationEditor stuff builds everything else. This has no functional changes, except: - I removed "Fork Paste" since I don't think it's particularly useful now that pastes are editable. We could restore it if users miss it. - Subscribers are now editable. - Form field order is a little goofy (this will be fixed in a future diff). - Subscribers and projects are now race-resistant. The race-resistance works like this: instead of submitting just the new value ("subscribers=apple, dog") and doing a set operation ("set subscribers = apple, dog"), we submit the old and new values ("original=apple" + "new=apple, dog") then apply the user's changes as an add + remove ("add=dog", "remove=<none>"). This means that two users who do "Edit Paste" at around the same time and each add or remove a couple of subscribers won't overwrite each other, unless they actually add or remove the exact same subscribers (in which case their edits legitimately conflict). Previously, the last user to save would win, and whatever was in their field would overwrite the prior state, potentially losing the first user's edits. Test Plan: - Created pastes. - Created pastes via API. - Edited pastes. - Edited every field. - Opened a paste in two windows and did project/subscriber edits in each, saved in arbitrary order, had edits respected. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14390
2015-11-03 03:58:32 +01:00
'PhabricatorEditField' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorEditType' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorEditor' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorElasticSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorElasticSearchSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorEmailAddressesSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorEmailFormatSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorEmailLoginController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorEmailPreferencesSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorEmailVerificationController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorEmbedFileRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'PhabricatorEmojiRemarkupRule' => 'PhutilRemarkupRule',
'PhabricatorEmptyQueryException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorEnv' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorEnvTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorEvent' => 'PhutilEvent',
'PhabricatorEventEngine' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorEventListener' => 'PhutilEventListener',
'PhabricatorEventType' => 'PhutilEventType',
'PhabricatorExampleEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
'PhabricatorExtendingPhabricatorConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorExtensionsSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorExternalAccount' => array(
'PhabricatorUserDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorExternalAccountQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorExternalAccountsSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorExtraConfigSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorFacebookAuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorOAuth2AuthProvider',
2012-07-27 22:46:01 +02:00
'PhabricatorFactAggregate' => 'PhabricatorFactDAO',
'PhabricatorFactApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorFactChartController' => 'PhabricatorFactController',
2012-07-27 22:46:01 +02:00
'PhabricatorFactController' => 'PhabricatorController',
Add a basic "fact" application Summary: Basic "Fact" application with some storage, part of a daemon, and a control binary. = Goals = The general idea is that we have various statistics we'd like to compute, like the frequency of image macros, reviewer responsiveness, task close rates, etc. Computing these on page load is expensive and messy. By building an ETL pipeline and running it in a daemon, we can precompute statistics and just pull them out of "stats" tables. One way to do this is just to completely hard-code everything, e.g. have a daemon that runs every hour which issues a big-ass query and dumps results into a table per-fact or per fact-group. But this has a bunch of drawbacks: adding new stuff to the pipeline is a pain, various fact aggregators can't share much code, updates are slow and expensive, we can never build generic graphs on top of it, etc. I'm hoping to build an ETL pipeline which is generic enough that we can use it for most things we're interested in without needing schema changes, and so that installs can use it also without needing schema changes, while still being specific enough that it's fast and we can build useful stuff on top of it. I'm not sure if this will actually work, but it would be cool if it does so I'm starting pretty generally and we'll see how far I get. I haven't built this exact sort of thing before so I might be way off. I'm basing the whole thing on analyzing entire objects, not analyzing changes to objects. So each part of the pipeline is handed an object and told "analyze this", not handed a change. It pretty much deletes all the old data about that thing and then writes new data. I think this is simpler to implement and understand, and it protects us from all sorts of weird issues where we end up with some kind of garbage in the DB and have to wipe the whole thing. = Facts = The general idea is that we extract "facts" out of objects, and then the various view interfaces just report those facts. This change has on type of fact, a "raw fact", which is directly derived from an object. These facts are concerete and relate specifically to the object they are derived from. Some examples of such facts might be: D123 has 9 comments. D123 uses macro "psyduck" 15 times. D123 adds 35 lines. D123 has 5 files. D123 has 1 object. D123 has 1 object of type "DREV". D123 was created at epoch timestamp 89812351235. D123 was accepted by @alincoln at epoch timestamp 8397981839. The fact storage looks like this: <factType, objectPHID, objectA, valueX, valueY, epoch> Currently, we supprot one optional secondary key (like a user PHID or macro PHID), two optional integer values, and an optional timestamp. We might add more later. Each fact type can use these fields if it wants. Some facts use them, others don't. For instance, this diff adds a "N:*" fact, which is just the count of total objects in the system. These facts just look like: <"N:*", "PHID-xxxx-yyyy", ...> ...where all other fields are ignored. But some of the more complex facts might look like: <"DREV:accept", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", ..., ..., nnnn> # User 'yyyy' accepted at epoch 'nnnn'. <"FILE:macro", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-MACR-yyyy", 17, ..., ...> # Object 'xxxx' uses macro 'yyyy' 17 times. Facts have no uniqueness constraints. For @vrana's reviewer responsiveness stuff, we can insert multiple rows for each reviewer, e.g. <"DREV:reviewed", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", nnnn, ..., mmmm> # User 'yyyy' reviewed revision 'xxxx' after 'nnnn' seconds at 'mmmm'. The second value (valueY) is mostly because we need it if we sample anything (valueX = observed value, valueY = sample rate) but there might be other uses. We might need to add "objectB" at some point too -- currently we can't represent a fact like "User X used macro Y on revision Z", so it would be impossible to compute macro use rates //for a specific user// based on this schema. I think we can start here though and see how far we get. = Aggregated Facts = These aren't implemented yet, but the idea is that we can then take the "raw facts" and compute derived/aggregated/rollup facts based on the raw fact table. For example, the "count" fact can be aggregated to arrive at a count of all objects in the system. This stuff will live in a separate table which does have uniqueness constraints, and come in the next diff. We might need some kind of time series facts too, not sure about that. I think most of our use cases today are covered by raw facts + aggregated facts. Test Plan: Ran `bin/fact` commands and verified they seemed to do reasonable things. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan Reviewed By: vrana CC: aran, majak Maniphest Tasks: T1562 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3078
2012-07-27 22:34:21 +02:00
'PhabricatorFactCountEngine' => 'PhabricatorFactEngine',
'PhabricatorFactCursor' => 'PhabricatorFactDAO',
Add a basic "fact" application Summary: Basic "Fact" application with some storage, part of a daemon, and a control binary. = Goals = The general idea is that we have various statistics we'd like to compute, like the frequency of image macros, reviewer responsiveness, task close rates, etc. Computing these on page load is expensive and messy. By building an ETL pipeline and running it in a daemon, we can precompute statistics and just pull them out of "stats" tables. One way to do this is just to completely hard-code everything, e.g. have a daemon that runs every hour which issues a big-ass query and dumps results into a table per-fact or per fact-group. But this has a bunch of drawbacks: adding new stuff to the pipeline is a pain, various fact aggregators can't share much code, updates are slow and expensive, we can never build generic graphs on top of it, etc. I'm hoping to build an ETL pipeline which is generic enough that we can use it for most things we're interested in without needing schema changes, and so that installs can use it also without needing schema changes, while still being specific enough that it's fast and we can build useful stuff on top of it. I'm not sure if this will actually work, but it would be cool if it does so I'm starting pretty generally and we'll see how far I get. I haven't built this exact sort of thing before so I might be way off. I'm basing the whole thing on analyzing entire objects, not analyzing changes to objects. So each part of the pipeline is handed an object and told "analyze this", not handed a change. It pretty much deletes all the old data about that thing and then writes new data. I think this is simpler to implement and understand, and it protects us from all sorts of weird issues where we end up with some kind of garbage in the DB and have to wipe the whole thing. = Facts = The general idea is that we extract "facts" out of objects, and then the various view interfaces just report those facts. This change has on type of fact, a "raw fact", which is directly derived from an object. These facts are concerete and relate specifically to the object they are derived from. Some examples of such facts might be: D123 has 9 comments. D123 uses macro "psyduck" 15 times. D123 adds 35 lines. D123 has 5 files. D123 has 1 object. D123 has 1 object of type "DREV". D123 was created at epoch timestamp 89812351235. D123 was accepted by @alincoln at epoch timestamp 8397981839. The fact storage looks like this: <factType, objectPHID, objectA, valueX, valueY, epoch> Currently, we supprot one optional secondary key (like a user PHID or macro PHID), two optional integer values, and an optional timestamp. We might add more later. Each fact type can use these fields if it wants. Some facts use them, others don't. For instance, this diff adds a "N:*" fact, which is just the count of total objects in the system. These facts just look like: <"N:*", "PHID-xxxx-yyyy", ...> ...where all other fields are ignored. But some of the more complex facts might look like: <"DREV:accept", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", ..., ..., nnnn> # User 'yyyy' accepted at epoch 'nnnn'. <"FILE:macro", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-MACR-yyyy", 17, ..., ...> # Object 'xxxx' uses macro 'yyyy' 17 times. Facts have no uniqueness constraints. For @vrana's reviewer responsiveness stuff, we can insert multiple rows for each reviewer, e.g. <"DREV:reviewed", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", nnnn, ..., mmmm> # User 'yyyy' reviewed revision 'xxxx' after 'nnnn' seconds at 'mmmm'. The second value (valueY) is mostly because we need it if we sample anything (valueX = observed value, valueY = sample rate) but there might be other uses. We might need to add "objectB" at some point too -- currently we can't represent a fact like "User X used macro Y on revision Z", so it would be impossible to compute macro use rates //for a specific user// based on this schema. I think we can start here though and see how far we get. = Aggregated Facts = These aren't implemented yet, but the idea is that we can then take the "raw facts" and compute derived/aggregated/rollup facts based on the raw fact table. For example, the "count" fact can be aggregated to arrive at a count of all objects in the system. This stuff will live in a separate table which does have uniqueness constraints, and come in the next diff. We might need some kind of time series facts too, not sure about that. I think most of our use cases today are covered by raw facts + aggregated facts. Test Plan: Ran `bin/fact` commands and verified they seemed to do reasonable things. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan Reviewed By: vrana CC: aran, majak Maniphest Tasks: T1562 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3078
2012-07-27 22:34:21 +02:00
'PhabricatorFactDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorFactDaemon' => 'PhabricatorDaemon',
'PhabricatorFactEngine' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorFactEngineTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
2012-07-27 22:46:01 +02:00
'PhabricatorFactHomeController' => 'PhabricatorFactController',
'PhabricatorFactLastUpdatedEngine' => 'PhabricatorFactEngine',
Add a basic "fact" application Summary: Basic "Fact" application with some storage, part of a daemon, and a control binary. = Goals = The general idea is that we have various statistics we'd like to compute, like the frequency of image macros, reviewer responsiveness, task close rates, etc. Computing these on page load is expensive and messy. By building an ETL pipeline and running it in a daemon, we can precompute statistics and just pull them out of "stats" tables. One way to do this is just to completely hard-code everything, e.g. have a daemon that runs every hour which issues a big-ass query and dumps results into a table per-fact or per fact-group. But this has a bunch of drawbacks: adding new stuff to the pipeline is a pain, various fact aggregators can't share much code, updates are slow and expensive, we can never build generic graphs on top of it, etc. I'm hoping to build an ETL pipeline which is generic enough that we can use it for most things we're interested in without needing schema changes, and so that installs can use it also without needing schema changes, while still being specific enough that it's fast and we can build useful stuff on top of it. I'm not sure if this will actually work, but it would be cool if it does so I'm starting pretty generally and we'll see how far I get. I haven't built this exact sort of thing before so I might be way off. I'm basing the whole thing on analyzing entire objects, not analyzing changes to objects. So each part of the pipeline is handed an object and told "analyze this", not handed a change. It pretty much deletes all the old data about that thing and then writes new data. I think this is simpler to implement and understand, and it protects us from all sorts of weird issues where we end up with some kind of garbage in the DB and have to wipe the whole thing. = Facts = The general idea is that we extract "facts" out of objects, and then the various view interfaces just report those facts. This change has on type of fact, a "raw fact", which is directly derived from an object. These facts are concerete and relate specifically to the object they are derived from. Some examples of such facts might be: D123 has 9 comments. D123 uses macro "psyduck" 15 times. D123 adds 35 lines. D123 has 5 files. D123 has 1 object. D123 has 1 object of type "DREV". D123 was created at epoch timestamp 89812351235. D123 was accepted by @alincoln at epoch timestamp 8397981839. The fact storage looks like this: <factType, objectPHID, objectA, valueX, valueY, epoch> Currently, we supprot one optional secondary key (like a user PHID or macro PHID), two optional integer values, and an optional timestamp. We might add more later. Each fact type can use these fields if it wants. Some facts use them, others don't. For instance, this diff adds a "N:*" fact, which is just the count of total objects in the system. These facts just look like: <"N:*", "PHID-xxxx-yyyy", ...> ...where all other fields are ignored. But some of the more complex facts might look like: <"DREV:accept", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", ..., ..., nnnn> # User 'yyyy' accepted at epoch 'nnnn'. <"FILE:macro", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-MACR-yyyy", 17, ..., ...> # Object 'xxxx' uses macro 'yyyy' 17 times. Facts have no uniqueness constraints. For @vrana's reviewer responsiveness stuff, we can insert multiple rows for each reviewer, e.g. <"DREV:reviewed", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", nnnn, ..., mmmm> # User 'yyyy' reviewed revision 'xxxx' after 'nnnn' seconds at 'mmmm'. The second value (valueY) is mostly because we need it if we sample anything (valueX = observed value, valueY = sample rate) but there might be other uses. We might need to add "objectB" at some point too -- currently we can't represent a fact like "User X used macro Y on revision Z", so it would be impossible to compute macro use rates //for a specific user// based on this schema. I think we can start here though and see how far we get. = Aggregated Facts = These aren't implemented yet, but the idea is that we can then take the "raw facts" and compute derived/aggregated/rollup facts based on the raw fact table. For example, the "count" fact can be aggregated to arrive at a count of all objects in the system. This stuff will live in a separate table which does have uniqueness constraints, and come in the next diff. We might need some kind of time series facts too, not sure about that. I think most of our use cases today are covered by raw facts + aggregated facts. Test Plan: Ran `bin/fact` commands and verified they seemed to do reasonable things. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan Reviewed By: vrana CC: aran, majak Maniphest Tasks: T1562 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3078
2012-07-27 22:34:21 +02:00
'PhabricatorFactManagementAnalyzeWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorFactManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorFactManagementCursorsWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorFactManagementWorkflow',
Add a basic "fact" application Summary: Basic "Fact" application with some storage, part of a daemon, and a control binary. = Goals = The general idea is that we have various statistics we'd like to compute, like the frequency of image macros, reviewer responsiveness, task close rates, etc. Computing these on page load is expensive and messy. By building an ETL pipeline and running it in a daemon, we can precompute statistics and just pull them out of "stats" tables. One way to do this is just to completely hard-code everything, e.g. have a daemon that runs every hour which issues a big-ass query and dumps results into a table per-fact or per fact-group. But this has a bunch of drawbacks: adding new stuff to the pipeline is a pain, various fact aggregators can't share much code, updates are slow and expensive, we can never build generic graphs on top of it, etc. I'm hoping to build an ETL pipeline which is generic enough that we can use it for most things we're interested in without needing schema changes, and so that installs can use it also without needing schema changes, while still being specific enough that it's fast and we can build useful stuff on top of it. I'm not sure if this will actually work, but it would be cool if it does so I'm starting pretty generally and we'll see how far I get. I haven't built this exact sort of thing before so I might be way off. I'm basing the whole thing on analyzing entire objects, not analyzing changes to objects. So each part of the pipeline is handed an object and told "analyze this", not handed a change. It pretty much deletes all the old data about that thing and then writes new data. I think this is simpler to implement and understand, and it protects us from all sorts of weird issues where we end up with some kind of garbage in the DB and have to wipe the whole thing. = Facts = The general idea is that we extract "facts" out of objects, and then the various view interfaces just report those facts. This change has on type of fact, a "raw fact", which is directly derived from an object. These facts are concerete and relate specifically to the object they are derived from. Some examples of such facts might be: D123 has 9 comments. D123 uses macro "psyduck" 15 times. D123 adds 35 lines. D123 has 5 files. D123 has 1 object. D123 has 1 object of type "DREV". D123 was created at epoch timestamp 89812351235. D123 was accepted by @alincoln at epoch timestamp 8397981839. The fact storage looks like this: <factType, objectPHID, objectA, valueX, valueY, epoch> Currently, we supprot one optional secondary key (like a user PHID or macro PHID), two optional integer values, and an optional timestamp. We might add more later. Each fact type can use these fields if it wants. Some facts use them, others don't. For instance, this diff adds a "N:*" fact, which is just the count of total objects in the system. These facts just look like: <"N:*", "PHID-xxxx-yyyy", ...> ...where all other fields are ignored. But some of the more complex facts might look like: <"DREV:accept", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", ..., ..., nnnn> # User 'yyyy' accepted at epoch 'nnnn'. <"FILE:macro", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-MACR-yyyy", 17, ..., ...> # Object 'xxxx' uses macro 'yyyy' 17 times. Facts have no uniqueness constraints. For @vrana's reviewer responsiveness stuff, we can insert multiple rows for each reviewer, e.g. <"DREV:reviewed", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", nnnn, ..., mmmm> # User 'yyyy' reviewed revision 'xxxx' after 'nnnn' seconds at 'mmmm'. The second value (valueY) is mostly because we need it if we sample anything (valueX = observed value, valueY = sample rate) but there might be other uses. We might need to add "objectB" at some point too -- currently we can't represent a fact like "User X used macro Y on revision Z", so it would be impossible to compute macro use rates //for a specific user// based on this schema. I think we can start here though and see how far we get. = Aggregated Facts = These aren't implemented yet, but the idea is that we can then take the "raw facts" and compute derived/aggregated/rollup facts based on the raw fact table. For example, the "count" fact can be aggregated to arrive at a count of all objects in the system. This stuff will live in a separate table which does have uniqueness constraints, and come in the next diff. We might need some kind of time series facts too, not sure about that. I think most of our use cases today are covered by raw facts + aggregated facts. Test Plan: Ran `bin/fact` commands and verified they seemed to do reasonable things. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan Reviewed By: vrana CC: aran, majak Maniphest Tasks: T1562 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3078
2012-07-27 22:34:21 +02:00
'PhabricatorFactManagementDestroyWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorFactManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorFactManagementListWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorFactManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorFactManagementStatusWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorFactManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorFactManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
Add a basic "fact" application Summary: Basic "Fact" application with some storage, part of a daemon, and a control binary. = Goals = The general idea is that we have various statistics we'd like to compute, like the frequency of image macros, reviewer responsiveness, task close rates, etc. Computing these on page load is expensive and messy. By building an ETL pipeline and running it in a daemon, we can precompute statistics and just pull them out of "stats" tables. One way to do this is just to completely hard-code everything, e.g. have a daemon that runs every hour which issues a big-ass query and dumps results into a table per-fact or per fact-group. But this has a bunch of drawbacks: adding new stuff to the pipeline is a pain, various fact aggregators can't share much code, updates are slow and expensive, we can never build generic graphs on top of it, etc. I'm hoping to build an ETL pipeline which is generic enough that we can use it for most things we're interested in without needing schema changes, and so that installs can use it also without needing schema changes, while still being specific enough that it's fast and we can build useful stuff on top of it. I'm not sure if this will actually work, but it would be cool if it does so I'm starting pretty generally and we'll see how far I get. I haven't built this exact sort of thing before so I might be way off. I'm basing the whole thing on analyzing entire objects, not analyzing changes to objects. So each part of the pipeline is handed an object and told "analyze this", not handed a change. It pretty much deletes all the old data about that thing and then writes new data. I think this is simpler to implement and understand, and it protects us from all sorts of weird issues where we end up with some kind of garbage in the DB and have to wipe the whole thing. = Facts = The general idea is that we extract "facts" out of objects, and then the various view interfaces just report those facts. This change has on type of fact, a "raw fact", which is directly derived from an object. These facts are concerete and relate specifically to the object they are derived from. Some examples of such facts might be: D123 has 9 comments. D123 uses macro "psyduck" 15 times. D123 adds 35 lines. D123 has 5 files. D123 has 1 object. D123 has 1 object of type "DREV". D123 was created at epoch timestamp 89812351235. D123 was accepted by @alincoln at epoch timestamp 8397981839. The fact storage looks like this: <factType, objectPHID, objectA, valueX, valueY, epoch> Currently, we supprot one optional secondary key (like a user PHID or macro PHID), two optional integer values, and an optional timestamp. We might add more later. Each fact type can use these fields if it wants. Some facts use them, others don't. For instance, this diff adds a "N:*" fact, which is just the count of total objects in the system. These facts just look like: <"N:*", "PHID-xxxx-yyyy", ...> ...where all other fields are ignored. But some of the more complex facts might look like: <"DREV:accept", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", ..., ..., nnnn> # User 'yyyy' accepted at epoch 'nnnn'. <"FILE:macro", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-MACR-yyyy", 17, ..., ...> # Object 'xxxx' uses macro 'yyyy' 17 times. Facts have no uniqueness constraints. For @vrana's reviewer responsiveness stuff, we can insert multiple rows for each reviewer, e.g. <"DREV:reviewed", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", nnnn, ..., mmmm> # User 'yyyy' reviewed revision 'xxxx' after 'nnnn' seconds at 'mmmm'. The second value (valueY) is mostly because we need it if we sample anything (valueX = observed value, valueY = sample rate) but there might be other uses. We might need to add "objectB" at some point too -- currently we can't represent a fact like "User X used macro Y on revision Z", so it would be impossible to compute macro use rates //for a specific user// based on this schema. I think we can start here though and see how far we get. = Aggregated Facts = These aren't implemented yet, but the idea is that we can then take the "raw facts" and compute derived/aggregated/rollup facts based on the raw fact table. For example, the "count" fact can be aggregated to arrive at a count of all objects in the system. This stuff will live in a separate table which does have uniqueness constraints, and come in the next diff. We might need some kind of time series facts too, not sure about that. I think most of our use cases today are covered by raw facts + aggregated facts. Test Plan: Ran `bin/fact` commands and verified they seemed to do reasonable things. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan Reviewed By: vrana CC: aran, majak Maniphest Tasks: T1562 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3078
2012-07-27 22:34:21 +02:00
'PhabricatorFactRaw' => 'PhabricatorFactDAO',
'PhabricatorFactSimpleSpec' => 'PhabricatorFactSpec',
'PhabricatorFactSpec' => 'Phobject',
Add a basic "fact" application Summary: Basic "Fact" application with some storage, part of a daemon, and a control binary. = Goals = The general idea is that we have various statistics we'd like to compute, like the frequency of image macros, reviewer responsiveness, task close rates, etc. Computing these on page load is expensive and messy. By building an ETL pipeline and running it in a daemon, we can precompute statistics and just pull them out of "stats" tables. One way to do this is just to completely hard-code everything, e.g. have a daemon that runs every hour which issues a big-ass query and dumps results into a table per-fact or per fact-group. But this has a bunch of drawbacks: adding new stuff to the pipeline is a pain, various fact aggregators can't share much code, updates are slow and expensive, we can never build generic graphs on top of it, etc. I'm hoping to build an ETL pipeline which is generic enough that we can use it for most things we're interested in without needing schema changes, and so that installs can use it also without needing schema changes, while still being specific enough that it's fast and we can build useful stuff on top of it. I'm not sure if this will actually work, but it would be cool if it does so I'm starting pretty generally and we'll see how far I get. I haven't built this exact sort of thing before so I might be way off. I'm basing the whole thing on analyzing entire objects, not analyzing changes to objects. So each part of the pipeline is handed an object and told "analyze this", not handed a change. It pretty much deletes all the old data about that thing and then writes new data. I think this is simpler to implement and understand, and it protects us from all sorts of weird issues where we end up with some kind of garbage in the DB and have to wipe the whole thing. = Facts = The general idea is that we extract "facts" out of objects, and then the various view interfaces just report those facts. This change has on type of fact, a "raw fact", which is directly derived from an object. These facts are concerete and relate specifically to the object they are derived from. Some examples of such facts might be: D123 has 9 comments. D123 uses macro "psyduck" 15 times. D123 adds 35 lines. D123 has 5 files. D123 has 1 object. D123 has 1 object of type "DREV". D123 was created at epoch timestamp 89812351235. D123 was accepted by @alincoln at epoch timestamp 8397981839. The fact storage looks like this: <factType, objectPHID, objectA, valueX, valueY, epoch> Currently, we supprot one optional secondary key (like a user PHID or macro PHID), two optional integer values, and an optional timestamp. We might add more later. Each fact type can use these fields if it wants. Some facts use them, others don't. For instance, this diff adds a "N:*" fact, which is just the count of total objects in the system. These facts just look like: <"N:*", "PHID-xxxx-yyyy", ...> ...where all other fields are ignored. But some of the more complex facts might look like: <"DREV:accept", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", ..., ..., nnnn> # User 'yyyy' accepted at epoch 'nnnn'. <"FILE:macro", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-MACR-yyyy", 17, ..., ...> # Object 'xxxx' uses macro 'yyyy' 17 times. Facts have no uniqueness constraints. For @vrana's reviewer responsiveness stuff, we can insert multiple rows for each reviewer, e.g. <"DREV:reviewed", "PHID-DREV-xxxx", "PHID-USER-yyyy", nnnn, ..., mmmm> # User 'yyyy' reviewed revision 'xxxx' after 'nnnn' seconds at 'mmmm'. The second value (valueY) is mostly because we need it if we sample anything (valueX = observed value, valueY = sample rate) but there might be other uses. We might need to add "objectB" at some point too -- currently we can't represent a fact like "User X used macro Y on revision Z", so it would be impossible to compute macro use rates //for a specific user// based on this schema. I think we can start here though and see how far we get. = Aggregated Facts = These aren't implemented yet, but the idea is that we can then take the "raw facts" and compute derived/aggregated/rollup facts based on the raw fact table. For example, the "count" fact can be aggregated to arrive at a count of all objects in the system. This stuff will live in a separate table which does have uniqueness constraints, and come in the next diff. We might need some kind of time series facts too, not sure about that. I think most of our use cases today are covered by raw facts + aggregated facts. Test Plan: Ran `bin/fact` commands and verified they seemed to do reasonable things. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan Reviewed By: vrana CC: aran, majak Maniphest Tasks: T1562 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3078
2012-07-27 22:34:21 +02:00
'PhabricatorFactUpdateIterator' => 'PhutilBufferedIterator',
'PhabricatorFeedApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorFeedBuilder' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorFeedConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorFeedController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorFeedDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorFeedDetailController' => 'PhabricatorFeedController',
'PhabricatorFeedListController' => 'PhabricatorFeedController',
Push feed publishing deeper into the task queue Summary: Ref T2852. I want to model Asana integration as a response to feed events. Currently, we queue one feed event for each HTTP hook. Instead, always queue one feed event and then have it queue any necessary followup events (now, http hooks; soon, asana). Add a script to make it easy to reproducibly fire feed event publishing. Test Plan: Republished a feed event and verified it hit configured HTTP hooks correctly. $ ./bin/feed republish 5765774156541908292 --trace >>> [2] <connect> phabricator2_feed <<< [2] <connect> 1,660 us >>> [3] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC <<< [3] <query> 595 us >>> [4] <connect> phabricator2_differential <<< [4] <connect> 760 us >>> [5] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [5] <query> 478 us >>> [6] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [6] <query> 449 us >>> [7] <connect> phabricator2_user <<< [7] <connect> 1,062 us >>> [8] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') <<< [8] <query> 540 us >>> [9] <connect> phabricator2_file <<< [9] <connect> 951 us >>> [10] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7') <<< [10] <query> 498 us >>> [11] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo <<< [11] <query> 507 us Republishing story... >>> [12] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC <<< [12] <query> 685 us >>> [13] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [13] <query> 489 us >>> [14] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [14] <query> 512 us >>> [15] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') <<< [15] <query> 601 us >>> [16] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7') <<< [16] <query> 405 us >>> [17] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo <<< [17] <query> 551 us >>> [18] <query> SELECT story.* FROM `feed_storydata` story JOIN `feed_storyreference` ref ON ref.chronologicalKey = story.chronologicalKey WHERE (ref.chronologicalKey IN (5765774156541908292)) GROUP BY story.chronologicalKey ORDER BY story.chronologicalKey DESC <<< [18] <query> 507 us >>> [19] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [19] <query> 428 us >>> [20] <query> SELECT * FROM `differential_revision` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-DREV-ywqmrj5zgkdloqh5p3c5') <<< [20] <query> 419 us >>> [21] <query> SELECT * FROM `user` WHERE phid in ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') <<< [21] <query> 591 us >>> [22] <query> SELECT * FROM `file` WHERE phid IN ('PHID-FILE-gq6dlsysvxbn3dgwvky7') <<< [22] <query> 406 us >>> [23] <query> SELECT * FROM `user_status` WHERE userPHID IN ('PHID-USER-lqiz3yd7wmk64ejugvov') AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP() BETWEEN dateFrom AND dateTo <<< [23] <query> 593 us >>> [24] <http> http://127.0.0.1/derp/ <<< [24] <http> 746,157 us [2013-06-24 20:23:26] EXCEPTION: (HTTPFutureResponseStatusHTTP) [HTTP/500] Internal Server Error Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2852 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6291
2013-06-26 01:29:47 +02:00
'PhabricatorFeedManagementRepublishWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorFeedManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorFeedManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorFeedQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorFeedSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorFeedStory' => array(
'Phobject',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
),
'PhabricatorFeedStoryData' => 'PhabricatorFeedDAO',
'PhabricatorFeedStoryNotification' => 'PhabricatorFeedDAO',
'PhabricatorFeedStoryPublisher' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorFeedStoryReference' => 'PhabricatorFeedDAO',
'PhabricatorFile' => array(
'PhabricatorFileDAO',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'PhabricatorFileBundleLoader' => 'Phobject',
Add a chunking storage engine for files Summary: Ref T7149. This isn't complete and isn't active yet, but does basically work. I'll shore it up in the next few diffs. The new workflow goes like this: > Client, file.allocate(): I'd like to upload a file with length L, metadata M, and hash H. Then the server returns `upload` (a boolean) and `filePHID` (a PHID). These mean: | upload | filePHID | means | |---|---|---| | false | false | Server can't accept file. | false | true | File data already known, file created from hash. | true | false | Just upload normally. | true | true | Query chunks to start or resume a chunked upload. All but the last case are uninteresting and work like exising uploads with `file.uploadhash` (which we can eventually deprecate). In the last case: > Client, file.querychunks(): Give me a list of chunks that I should upload. This returns all the chunks for the file. Chunks have a start byte, an end byte, and a "complete" flag to indicate that the server already has the data. Then, the client fills in chunks by sending them: > Client, file.uploadchunk(): Here is the data for one chunk. This stuff doesn't work yet or has some caveats: - I haven't tested resume much. - Files need an "isPartial()" flag for partial uploads, and the UI needs to respect it. - The JS client needs to become chunk-aware. - Chunk size is set crazy low to make testing easier. - Some debugging flags that I'll remove soon-ish. - Downloading works, but still streams the whole file into memory. - This storage engine is disabled by default (hardcoded as a unit test engine) because it's still sketchy. - Need some code to remove the "isParital" flag when the last chunk is uploaded. - Maybe do checksumming on chunks. Test Plan: - Hacked up `arc upload` (see next diff) to be chunk-aware and uploaded a readme in 18 32-byte chunks. Then downloaded it. Got the same file back that I uploaded. - File UI now shows some basic chunk info for chunked files: {F336434} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7149 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12060
2015-03-13 19:30:02 +01:00
'PhabricatorFileChunk' => array(
'PhabricatorFileDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'PhabricatorFileChunkIterator' => array(
'Phobject',
'Iterator',
),
Add a chunking storage engine for files Summary: Ref T7149. This isn't complete and isn't active yet, but does basically work. I'll shore it up in the next few diffs. The new workflow goes like this: > Client, file.allocate(): I'd like to upload a file with length L, metadata M, and hash H. Then the server returns `upload` (a boolean) and `filePHID` (a PHID). These mean: | upload | filePHID | means | |---|---|---| | false | false | Server can't accept file. | false | true | File data already known, file created from hash. | true | false | Just upload normally. | true | true | Query chunks to start or resume a chunked upload. All but the last case are uninteresting and work like exising uploads with `file.uploadhash` (which we can eventually deprecate). In the last case: > Client, file.querychunks(): Give me a list of chunks that I should upload. This returns all the chunks for the file. Chunks have a start byte, an end byte, and a "complete" flag to indicate that the server already has the data. Then, the client fills in chunks by sending them: > Client, file.uploadchunk(): Here is the data for one chunk. This stuff doesn't work yet or has some caveats: - I haven't tested resume much. - Files need an "isPartial()" flag for partial uploads, and the UI needs to respect it. - The JS client needs to become chunk-aware. - Chunk size is set crazy low to make testing easier. - Some debugging flags that I'll remove soon-ish. - Downloading works, but still streams the whole file into memory. - This storage engine is disabled by default (hardcoded as a unit test engine) because it's still sketchy. - Need some code to remove the "isParital" flag when the last chunk is uploaded. - Maybe do checksumming on chunks. Test Plan: - Hacked up `arc upload` (see next diff) to be chunk-aware and uploaded a readme in 18 32-byte chunks. Then downloaded it. Got the same file back that I uploaded. - File UI now shows some basic chunk info for chunked files: {F336434} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7149 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12060
2015-03-13 19:30:02 +01:00
'PhabricatorFileChunkQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorFileCommentController' => 'PhabricatorFileController',
'PhabricatorFileComposeController' => 'PhabricatorFileController',
2011-01-23 03:33:00 +01:00
'PhabricatorFileController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorFileDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorFileDataController' => 'PhabricatorFileController',
'PhabricatorFileDeleteController' => 'PhabricatorFileController',
'PhabricatorFileDropUploadController' => 'PhabricatorFileController',
'PhabricatorFileEditController' => 'PhabricatorFileController',
'PhabricatorFileEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorFileFilePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorFileHasObjectEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorFileImageMacro' => array(
'PhabricatorFileDAO',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorFileImageTransform' => 'PhabricatorFileTransform',
'PhabricatorFileInfoController' => 'PhabricatorFileController',
'PhabricatorFileLinkView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorFileListController' => 'PhabricatorFileController',
'PhabricatorFileQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorFileSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhabricatorFileSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
2011-01-23 03:33:00 +01:00
'PhabricatorFileStorageBlob' => 'PhabricatorFileDAO',
'PhabricatorFileStorageConfigurationException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorFileStorageEngine' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorFileStorageEngineTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorFileTemporaryGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'PhabricatorFileTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorFileTestDataGenerator' => 'PhabricatorTestDataGenerator',
'PhabricatorFileThumbnailTransform' => 'PhabricatorFileImageTransform',
'PhabricatorFileTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorFileTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'PhabricatorFileTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorFileTransform' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorFileTransformController' => 'PhabricatorFileController',
'PhabricatorFileTransformListController' => 'PhabricatorFileController',
'PhabricatorFileTransformTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
2011-01-23 03:33:00 +01:00
'PhabricatorFileUploadController' => 'PhabricatorFileController',
'PhabricatorFileUploadDialogController' => 'PhabricatorFileController',
'PhabricatorFileUploadException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorFileinfoSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorFilesApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorFilesApplicationStorageEnginePanel' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigurationPanel',
'PhabricatorFilesConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorFilesManagementCatWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorFilesManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorFilesManagementCompactWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorFilesManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorFilesManagementEnginesWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorFilesManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorFilesManagementMigrateWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorFilesManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorFilesManagementPurgeWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorFilesManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorFilesManagementRebuildWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorFilesManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorFilesManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorFilesOutboundRequestAction' => 'PhabricatorSystemAction',
'PhabricatorFlag' => array(
'PhabricatorFlagDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorFlagAddFlagHeraldAction' => 'HeraldAction',
'PhabricatorFlagColor' => 'PhabricatorFlagConstants',
'PhabricatorFlagConstants' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorFlagController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorFlagDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorFlagDeleteController' => 'PhabricatorFlagController',
'PhabricatorFlagEditController' => 'PhabricatorFlagController',
'PhabricatorFlagListController' => 'PhabricatorFlagController',
'PhabricatorFlagQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorFlagSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorFlagSelectControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface' => 'PhabricatorPHIDInterface',
'PhabricatorFlagsApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorFlagsUIEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
'PhabricatorFundApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorGDSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorGarbageCollector' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorGarbageCollectorManagementCollectWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollectorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorGarbageCollectorManagementSetPolicyWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollectorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorGarbageCollectorManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorGestureUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
Move Git discovery into DiscoveryEngine Summary: Ref T4327. Consolidates and simplifies infrastructure: - Moves Git discovery into DiscoveryEngine. - Collapses a bunch of the Git and Mercurial code related to stream discovery. - Removes all cach code from PullLocal daemon (it's no longer called). - Adds basic unit tests for Git and Mercurial discovery. Various cleanup: - Makes GitStream and MercurialStream extend a common base. - Improves performance of MercurialStream in some cases, by requiring fewer commits be output and parsed. - Makes mirroring exceptions easier to debug. - Fixes discovery of Mercurial repositories with multiple branch heads. - Adds some missing `pht()`. Test Plan: I tested this fairly throughly because I think this phase is complete: - Made new repositories in multiple VCSes and did full imports. - Particularly, I reimported Arcanist to make sure that TODO was resolved. I think it was related to the toposort stuff. - Pushed commits to multiple VCSes. - Pushed commits to a non-close branch, then pushed a merge commit. Observed commits import initially as non-close, then get flagged for close. - Started full daemons and resolved various minor issues that showed up in the daemon log until everything ran cleanly. - Basically spent about 30 minutes banging on this in every way I could think of to try to break it. I found and fixed some minor stuff, but it seems solid. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T4327 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7987
2014-01-17 00:31:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorGitGraphStream' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryGraphStream',
'PhabricatorGitHubAuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorOAuth2AuthProvider',
'PhabricatorGlobalLock' => 'PhutilLock',
'PhabricatorGlobalUploadTargetView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorGoogleAuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorOAuth2AuthProvider',
'PhabricatorHTTPParameterTypeTableView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorHandleList' => array(
'Phobject',
'Iterator',
'ArrayAccess',
'Countable',
),
'PhabricatorHandleObjectSelectorDataView' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorHandlePool' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorHandlePoolTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorHandleQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorHandlesEditField' => 'PhabricatorPHIDListEditField',
'PhabricatorHarbormasterApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorHarbormasterConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorHash' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorHashTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorHelpApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorHelpController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorHelpDocumentationController' => 'PhabricatorHelpController',
'PhabricatorHelpEditorProtocolController' => 'PhabricatorHelpController',
'PhabricatorHelpKeyboardShortcutController' => 'PhabricatorHelpController',
'PhabricatorHeraldApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorHighSecurityRequestExceptionHandler' => 'PhabricatorRequestExceptionHandler',
'PhabricatorHomeApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorHomeController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorHomeMainController' => 'PhabricatorHomeController',
'PhabricatorHomePreferencesSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorHomeQuickCreateController' => 'PhabricatorHomeController',
'PhabricatorHovercardUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PhabricatorHovercardView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorHunksManagementMigrateWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorHunksManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorHunksManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorIRCProtocolAdapter' => 'PhabricatorProtocolAdapter',
'PhabricatorIconRemarkupRule' => 'PhutilRemarkupRule',
'PhabricatorImageMacroRemarkupRule' => 'PhutilRemarkupRule',
'PhabricatorImageTransformer' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorImagemagickSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorInfrastructureTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorInlineCommentController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorInlineCommentInterface' => 'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
'PhabricatorInlineCommentPreviewController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorInlineSummaryView' => 'AphrontView',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorInstructionsEditField' => 'PhabricatorEditField',
'PhabricatorInternationalizationManagementExtractWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorInternationalizationManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorInternationalizationManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorInvalidConfigSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorIteratedMD5PasswordHasher' => 'PhabricatorPasswordHasher',
'PhabricatorIteratedMD5PasswordHasherTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorJIRAAuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorOAuth1AuthProvider',
'PhabricatorJavelinLinter' => 'ArcanistLinter',
'PhabricatorJiraIssueHasObjectEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorJumpNavHandler' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorKeyValueDatabaseCache' => 'PhutilKeyValueCache',
'PhabricatorLDAPAuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorAuthProvider',
'PhabricatorLegalpadApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorLegalpadConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorLegalpadDocumentPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorLegalpadSignaturePolicyRule' => 'PhabricatorPolicyRule',
'PhabricatorLibraryTestCase' => 'PhutilLibraryTestCase',
'PhabricatorLipsumArtist' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorLipsumGenerateWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorLipsumManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorLipsumManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorLipsumMondrianArtist' => 'PhabricatorLipsumArtist',
2011-01-23 02:48:55 +01:00
'PhabricatorLiskDAO' => 'LiskDAO',
'PhabricatorLiskSearchEngineExtension' => 'PhabricatorSearchEngineExtension',
'PhabricatorLiskSerializer' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorListFilterUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PhabricatorLocalDiskFileStorageEngine' => 'PhabricatorFileStorageEngine',
'PhabricatorLocalTimeTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorLocaleScopeGuard' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorLocaleScopeGuardTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
Implement clock/trigger infrastructure for scheduling actions Summary: Ref T6881. Hopefully, this is the hard part. This adds a new daemon (the "trigger" daemon) which processes triggers, schedules them, and then executes them at the scheduled time. The design is a little complicated, but has these goals: - High resistance to race conditions: only the application writes to the trigger table; only the daemon writes to the event table. We won't lose events if someone saves a meeting at the same time as we're sending a reminder out for it. - Execution guarantees: scheduled events are guaranteed to execute exactly once. - Support for arbitrarily large queues: the daemon will make progress even if there are millions of triggers in queue. The cost to update the queue is proportional to the number of changes in it; the cost to process the queue is proportional to the number of events to execute. - Relatively good observability: you can monitor the state of the trigger queue reasonably well from the web UI. - Modular Infrastructure: this is a very low-level construct that Calendar, Phortune, etc., should be able to build on top of. It doesn't have this stuff yet: - Not very robust to bad actions: a misbehaving trigger can stop the queue fairly easily. This is OK for now since we aren't planning to make it part of any other applications for a while. We do still get execute-exaclty-once, but it might not happen for a long time (until someone goes and fixes the queue), when we could theoretically continue executing other events. - Doesn't start automatically: normal users don't need to run this thing yet so I'm not starting it by default. - Not super well tested: I've vetted the basics but haven't run real workloads through this yet. - No sophisticated tooling: I added some basic stuff but it's missing some pieces we'll have to build sooner or later, e.g. `bin/trigger cancel` or whatever. - Intentionally not realtime: This design puts execution guarantees far above realtime concerns, and will not give you precise event execution at 1-second resolution. I think this is the correct goal to pursue architecturally, and certainly correct for subscriptions and meeting reminders. Events which execute after they have become irrelevant can simply decline to do anything (like a meeting reminder which executes after the meeting is over). In general, the expectation for applications is: - When creating an object (like a calendar event) that needs to trigger a scheduled action, write a trigger (and save the PHID if you plan to update it later). - The daemon will process the event and schedule the action efficiently, in a race-free way. - If you want to move the action, update the trigger and the daemon will take care of it. - Your action will eventually dump a task into the task queue, and the task daemons will actually perform it. Test Plan: Using a test script like this: ``` <?php require_once 'scripts/__init_script__.php'; $trigger = id(new PhabricatorWorkerTrigger()) ->setAction( new PhabricatorLogTriggerAction( array( 'message' => 'test', ))) ->setClock( new PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock( array( 'period' => 33, ))) ->save(); var_dump($trigger); ``` ...I queued triggers and ran the daemon: - Verified triggers fire; - verified triggers reschedule; - verified trigger events show up in the web UI; - tried different periods; - added some triggers while the daemon was running; - examined `phd debug` output for anything suspicious. It seems to work in trivial use case, at least. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T6881 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11419
2015-01-16 21:13:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorLogTriggerAction' => 'PhabricatorTriggerAction',
2011-01-31 03:52:29 +01:00
'PhabricatorLogoutController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorLunarPhasePolicyRule' => 'PhabricatorPolicyRule',
'PhabricatorMacroApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorMacroAudioController' => 'PhabricatorMacroController',
'PhabricatorMacroCommentController' => 'PhabricatorMacroController',
'PhabricatorMacroConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorMacroController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorMacroDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'PhabricatorMacroDisableController' => 'PhabricatorMacroController',
'PhabricatorMacroEditController' => 'PhabricatorMacroController',
'PhabricatorMacroEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorMacroListController' => 'PhabricatorMacroController',
'PhabricatorMacroMacroPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'PhabricatorMacroMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver',
'PhabricatorMacroManageCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PhabricatorMacroMemeController' => 'PhabricatorMacroController',
'PhabricatorMacroMemeDialogController' => 'PhabricatorMacroController',
'PhabricatorMacroQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorMacroReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'PhabricatorMacroSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorMacroTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorMacroTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'PhabricatorMacroTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorMacroViewController' => 'PhabricatorMacroController',
'PhabricatorMailEmailHeraldField' => 'HeraldField',
'PhabricatorMailEmailHeraldFieldGroup' => 'HeraldFieldGroup',
'PhabricatorMailEmailSubjectHeraldField' => 'PhabricatorMailEmailHeraldField',
'PhabricatorMailImplementationAdapter' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorMailImplementationAmazonSESAdapter' => 'PhabricatorMailImplementationPHPMailerLiteAdapter',
'PhabricatorMailImplementationMailgunAdapter' => 'PhabricatorMailImplementationAdapter',
'PhabricatorMailImplementationPHPMailerAdapter' => 'PhabricatorMailImplementationAdapter',
2011-01-26 18:33:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorMailImplementationPHPMailerLiteAdapter' => 'PhabricatorMailImplementationAdapter',
'PhabricatorMailImplementationSendGridAdapter' => 'PhabricatorMailImplementationAdapter',
'PhabricatorMailImplementationTestAdapter' => 'PhabricatorMailImplementationAdapter',
'PhabricatorMailManagementListInboundWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorMailManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorMailManagementListOutboundWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorMailManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorMailManagementReceiveTestWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorMailManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorMailManagementResendWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorMailManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorMailManagementSendTestWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorMailManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorMailManagementShowInboundWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorMailManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorMailManagementShowOutboundWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorMailManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorMailManagementVolumeWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorMailManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorMailManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorMailOutboundMailHeraldAdapter' => 'HeraldAdapter',
'PhabricatorMailOutboundRoutingHeraldAction' => 'HeraldAction',
'PhabricatorMailOutboundRoutingSelfEmailHeraldAction' => 'PhabricatorMailOutboundRoutingHeraldAction',
'PhabricatorMailOutboundRoutingSelfNotificationHeraldAction' => 'PhabricatorMailOutboundRoutingHeraldAction',
'PhabricatorMailOutboundStatus' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorMailReceiver' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorMailReceiverTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorMailReplyHandler' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorMailRoutingRule' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorMailSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
Build separate mail for each recipient, honoring recipient access levels Summary: Ref T6367. Removes `multiplexMail()`! We can't pass a single body into a function which splits it anymore: we need to split recipients first, then build bodies for each recipient list. This lets us build separate bodies for each recipient's individual translation/access levels. The new logic does this: - First, split recipients into groups called "targets". - Each target corresponds to one actual mail we're going to build. - Each target has a viewer (whose translation / access levels will be used to generate the mail). - Each target has a to/cc list (the users who we'll ultimately send the mail to). - For each target, build a custom mail body based on the viewer's access levels and settings (language prefs not actually implemented). - Then, deliver the mail. Test Plan: - Read new config help. Then did a bunch of testing, primarily with `bin/mail list-outbound` and `bin/mail show-outbound` (to review generated mail), `bin/phd debug taskmaster` (to run daemons freely) and `bin/worker execute --id <id>` (to repeatedly test a specific piece of code after identifying an issue). With `one-mail-per-recipient` on (default): - Sent mail to multiple users. - Verified mail showed up in `mail list-outbound`. - Examined mail with `mail show-outbound`. - Added a project that a subscriber could not see. - Verified it was not present in `X-Phabricator-Projects`. - Verified it was rendered as "Restricted Project" for the non-permissioned viewer. - Added a subscriber, then changed the object policy so they could not see it and sent mail. - Verified I received mail but the other user did not. - Enabled public replies and verified mail generated with public addresses. - Disabld public replies and verified mail generated with private addresses. With `one-mail-per-recipient` off: - Verified that one mail is sent to all recipients. - Verified users who can not see the object are still filtered. - Verified that partially-visible projects are completely visible in the mail (this violates policies, as documented, as the best available compromise). - Enabled public replies and verified the mail generated with "Reply To". Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: carlsverre, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T6367 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13131
2015-06-02 23:29:30 +02:00
'PhabricatorMailTarget' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorMailgunConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorMainMenuSearchView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorMainMenuView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow' => 'PhutilArgumentWorkflow',
'PhabricatorManiphestApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorManiphestConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorManiphestTaskTestDataGenerator' => 'PhabricatorTestDataGenerator',
Add a generic multistep Markup cache Summary: The immediate issue this addresses is T1366, adding a rendering cache to Phriction. For wiki pages with code blocks especially, rerendering them each time is expensive. The broader issue is that out markup caches aren't very good right now. They have three major problems: **Problem 1: the data is stored in the wrong place.** We currently store remarkup caches on objects. This means we're always loading it and passing it around even when we don't need it, can't genericize cache management code (e.g., have one simple script to drop/GC caches), need to update authoritative rows to clear caches, and can't genericize rendering code since each object is different. To solve this, I created a dedicated cache database that I plan to move all markup caches to use. **Problem 2: time-variant rules break when cached.** Some rules like `**bold**` are time-invariant and always produce the same output, but some rules like `{Tnnn}` and `@username` are variant and may render differently (because a task was closed or a user is on vacation). Currently, we cache the raw output, so these time-variant rules get locked at whatever values they had when they were first rendered. This is the main reason Phriction doesn't have a cache right now -- I wanted `{Tnnn}` rules to reflect open/closed tasks. To solve this, I split markup into a "preprocessing" phase (which does all the parsing and evaluates all time-invariant rules) and a "postprocessing" phase (which evaluates time-variant rules only). The preprocessing phase is most of the expense (and, notably, includes syntax highlighting) so this is nearly as good as caching the final output. I did most of the work here in D737 / D738, but we never moved to use it in Phabricator -- we currently just do the two operations serially in all cases. This diff splits them apart and caches the output of preprocessing only, so we benefit from caching but also get accurate time-variant rendering. **Problem 3: cache access isn't batched/pipelined optimally.** When we're rendering a list of markup blocks, we should be able to batch datafetching better than we do. D738 helped with this (fetching is batched within a single hunk of markup) and this improves batching on cache access. We could still do better here, but this is at least a step forward. Also fixes a bug with generating a link in the Phriction history interface ($uri gets clobbered). I'm using PHP serialization instead of JSON serialization because Remarkup does some stuff with non-ascii characters that might not survive JSON. Test Plan: - Created a Phriction document and verified that previews don't go to cache (no rows appear in the cache table). - Verified that published documents come out of cache. - Verified that caches generate/regenerate correctly, time-variant rules render properly and old documents hit the right caches. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1366 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2945
2012-07-10 00:20:56 +02:00
'PhabricatorMarkupCache' => 'PhabricatorCacheDAO',
'PhabricatorMarkupEngine' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorMarkupOneOff' => array(
'Phobject',
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
),
'PhabricatorMarkupPreviewController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorMemeRemarkupRule' => 'PhutilRemarkupRule',
'PhabricatorMentionRemarkupRule' => 'PhutilRemarkupRule',
Move Git discovery into DiscoveryEngine Summary: Ref T4327. Consolidates and simplifies infrastructure: - Moves Git discovery into DiscoveryEngine. - Collapses a bunch of the Git and Mercurial code related to stream discovery. - Removes all cach code from PullLocal daemon (it's no longer called). - Adds basic unit tests for Git and Mercurial discovery. Various cleanup: - Makes GitStream and MercurialStream extend a common base. - Improves performance of MercurialStream in some cases, by requiring fewer commits be output and parsed. - Makes mirroring exceptions easier to debug. - Fixes discovery of Mercurial repositories with multiple branch heads. - Adds some missing `pht()`. Test Plan: I tested this fairly throughly because I think this phase is complete: - Made new repositories in multiple VCSes and did full imports. - Particularly, I reimported Arcanist to make sure that TODO was resolved. I think it was related to the toposort stuff. - Pushed commits to multiple VCSes. - Pushed commits to a non-close branch, then pushed a merge commit. Observed commits import initially as non-close, then get flagged for close. - Started full daemons and resolved various minor issues that showed up in the daemon log until everything ran cleanly. - Basically spent about 30 minutes banging on this in every way I could think of to try to break it. I found and fixed some minor stuff, but it seems solid. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T4327 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7987
2014-01-17 00:31:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorMercurialGraphStream' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryGraphStream',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAActor' => 'Phobject',
Show why recipients were excluded from mail Summary: Ref T3306. This interface has a hard time balancing security/policy issues and I'm not sure what the best way forward is. Some possibilities: # We just let you see everything from the web UI. - This makes debugging easier. - Anyone who can see this stuff can trivially take over any user's account with five seconds of work and no technical expertise (reset their password from the web UI, then go read the email and click the link). # We let you see everything, but only for messages you were a recipient of or author of. - This makes it much more difficult to debug issues with mailing lists. - But maybe we could just say mailing list recipients are "public", or define some other ruleset. - Generally this gets privacy and ease of use right. # We could move the whole thing to the CLI. - Makes the UI/UX way worse. # We could strike an awkward balance between concerns, as we do now. - We expose //who// sent and received messages, but not the content of the messages. This doesn't feel great. I'm inclined to probably go with (2) and figure something out for mailing lists? Anyway, irrespective of that this should generally make things more clear, and improves the code a lot if nothing else. Test Plan: {F49546} - Looked at a bunch of mail. - Sent mail from different apps. - Checked that recipients seem correct. Reviewers: btrahan, chad Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T3306 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6413
2013-07-11 00:17:38 +02:00
'PhabricatorMetaMTAActorQuery' => 'PhabricatorQuery',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmail' => array(
'PhabricatorMetaMTADAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorSpacesInterface',
),
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailHeraldField' => 'HeraldField',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailPanel' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigurationPanel',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAApplicationEmailTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAAttachment' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
2011-01-26 02:40:21 +01:00
'PhabricatorMetaMTAController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorMetaMTADAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailBodyParser' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailBodyParserTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailHeraldAction' => 'HeraldAction',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailOthersHeraldAction' => 'PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailHeraldAction',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailSelfHeraldAction' => 'PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailHeraldAction',
2014-04-04 03:43:18 +02:00
'PhabricatorMetaMTAErrorMailAction' => 'PhabricatorSystemAction',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMail' => array(
'PhabricatorMetaMTADAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailBody' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailBodyTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailHasRecipientEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailListController' => 'PhabricatorMetaMTAController',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailSection' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailViewController' => 'PhabricatorMetaMTAController',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailableDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailableFunctionDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMailgunReceiveController' => 'PhabricatorMetaMTAController',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAMemberQuery' => 'PhabricatorQuery',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAPermanentFailureException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMail' => 'PhabricatorMetaMTADAO',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMailProcessingException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMailTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorMetaMTASchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhabricatorMetaMTASendGridReceiveController' => 'PhabricatorMetaMTAController',
'PhabricatorMetaMTAWorker' => 'PhabricatorWorker',
Implement clock/trigger infrastructure for scheduling actions Summary: Ref T6881. Hopefully, this is the hard part. This adds a new daemon (the "trigger" daemon) which processes triggers, schedules them, and then executes them at the scheduled time. The design is a little complicated, but has these goals: - High resistance to race conditions: only the application writes to the trigger table; only the daemon writes to the event table. We won't lose events if someone saves a meeting at the same time as we're sending a reminder out for it. - Execution guarantees: scheduled events are guaranteed to execute exactly once. - Support for arbitrarily large queues: the daemon will make progress even if there are millions of triggers in queue. The cost to update the queue is proportional to the number of changes in it; the cost to process the queue is proportional to the number of events to execute. - Relatively good observability: you can monitor the state of the trigger queue reasonably well from the web UI. - Modular Infrastructure: this is a very low-level construct that Calendar, Phortune, etc., should be able to build on top of. It doesn't have this stuff yet: - Not very robust to bad actions: a misbehaving trigger can stop the queue fairly easily. This is OK for now since we aren't planning to make it part of any other applications for a while. We do still get execute-exaclty-once, but it might not happen for a long time (until someone goes and fixes the queue), when we could theoretically continue executing other events. - Doesn't start automatically: normal users don't need to run this thing yet so I'm not starting it by default. - Not super well tested: I've vetted the basics but haven't run real workloads through this yet. - No sophisticated tooling: I added some basic stuff but it's missing some pieces we'll have to build sooner or later, e.g. `bin/trigger cancel` or whatever. - Intentionally not realtime: This design puts execution guarantees far above realtime concerns, and will not give you precise event execution at 1-second resolution. I think this is the correct goal to pursue architecturally, and certainly correct for subscriptions and meeting reminders. Events which execute after they have become irrelevant can simply decline to do anything (like a meeting reminder which executes after the meeting is over). In general, the expectation for applications is: - When creating an object (like a calendar event) that needs to trigger a scheduled action, write a trigger (and save the PHID if you plan to update it later). - The daemon will process the event and schedule the action efficiently, in a race-free way. - If you want to move the action, update the trigger and the daemon will take care of it. - Your action will eventually dump a task into the task queue, and the task daemons will actually perform it. Test Plan: Using a test script like this: ``` <?php require_once 'scripts/__init_script__.php'; $trigger = id(new PhabricatorWorkerTrigger()) ->setAction( new PhabricatorLogTriggerAction( array( 'message' => 'test', ))) ->setClock( new PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock( array( 'period' => 33, ))) ->save(); var_dump($trigger); ``` ...I queued triggers and ran the daemon: - Verified triggers fire; - verified triggers reschedule; - verified trigger events show up in the web UI; - tried different periods; - added some triggers while the daemon was running; - examined `phd debug` output for anything suspicious. It seems to work in trivial use case, at least. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T6881 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11419
2015-01-16 21:13:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock' => 'PhabricatorTriggerClock',
'PhabricatorMultiColumnUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PhabricatorMultiFactorSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorMultimeterApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorMustVerifyEmailController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
'PhabricatorMySQLConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorMySQLFileStorageEngine' => 'PhabricatorFileStorageEngine',
'PhabricatorMySQLSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorMySQLSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorNamedQuery' => array(
'PhabricatorSearchDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorNamedQueryQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorNavigationRemarkupRule' => 'PhutilRemarkupRule',
Implement clock/trigger infrastructure for scheduling actions Summary: Ref T6881. Hopefully, this is the hard part. This adds a new daemon (the "trigger" daemon) which processes triggers, schedules them, and then executes them at the scheduled time. The design is a little complicated, but has these goals: - High resistance to race conditions: only the application writes to the trigger table; only the daemon writes to the event table. We won't lose events if someone saves a meeting at the same time as we're sending a reminder out for it. - Execution guarantees: scheduled events are guaranteed to execute exactly once. - Support for arbitrarily large queues: the daemon will make progress even if there are millions of triggers in queue. The cost to update the queue is proportional to the number of changes in it; the cost to process the queue is proportional to the number of events to execute. - Relatively good observability: you can monitor the state of the trigger queue reasonably well from the web UI. - Modular Infrastructure: this is a very low-level construct that Calendar, Phortune, etc., should be able to build on top of. It doesn't have this stuff yet: - Not very robust to bad actions: a misbehaving trigger can stop the queue fairly easily. This is OK for now since we aren't planning to make it part of any other applications for a while. We do still get execute-exaclty-once, but it might not happen for a long time (until someone goes and fixes the queue), when we could theoretically continue executing other events. - Doesn't start automatically: normal users don't need to run this thing yet so I'm not starting it by default. - Not super well tested: I've vetted the basics but haven't run real workloads through this yet. - No sophisticated tooling: I added some basic stuff but it's missing some pieces we'll have to build sooner or later, e.g. `bin/trigger cancel` or whatever. - Intentionally not realtime: This design puts execution guarantees far above realtime concerns, and will not give you precise event execution at 1-second resolution. I think this is the correct goal to pursue architecturally, and certainly correct for subscriptions and meeting reminders. Events which execute after they have become irrelevant can simply decline to do anything (like a meeting reminder which executes after the meeting is over). In general, the expectation for applications is: - When creating an object (like a calendar event) that needs to trigger a scheduled action, write a trigger (and save the PHID if you plan to update it later). - The daemon will process the event and schedule the action efficiently, in a race-free way. - If you want to move the action, update the trigger and the daemon will take care of it. - Your action will eventually dump a task into the task queue, and the task daemons will actually perform it. Test Plan: Using a test script like this: ``` <?php require_once 'scripts/__init_script__.php'; $trigger = id(new PhabricatorWorkerTrigger()) ->setAction( new PhabricatorLogTriggerAction( array( 'message' => 'test', ))) ->setClock( new PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock( array( 'period' => 33, ))) ->save(); var_dump($trigger); ``` ...I queued triggers and ran the daemon: - Verified triggers fire; - verified triggers reschedule; - verified trigger events show up in the web UI; - tried different periods; - added some triggers while the daemon was running; - examined `phd debug` output for anything suspicious. It seems to work in trivial use case, at least. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T6881 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11419
2015-01-16 21:13:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorNeverTriggerClock' => 'PhabricatorTriggerClock',
'PhabricatorNotificationBuilder' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorNotificationClearController' => 'PhabricatorNotificationController',
'PhabricatorNotificationClient' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorNotificationConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorNotificationController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorNotificationIndividualController' => 'PhabricatorNotificationController',
'PhabricatorNotificationListController' => 'PhabricatorNotificationController',
'PhabricatorNotificationPanelController' => 'PhabricatorNotificationController',
'PhabricatorNotificationQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorNotificationSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorNotificationStatusController' => 'PhabricatorNotificationController',
'PhabricatorNotificationStatusView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PhabricatorNotificationTestController' => 'PhabricatorNotificationController',
'PhabricatorNotificationTestFeedStory' => 'PhabricatorFeedStory',
'PhabricatorNotificationUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PhabricatorNotificationsApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorNuanceApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorOAuth1AuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorOAuthAuthProvider',
'PhabricatorOAuth2AuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorOAuthAuthProvider',
'PhabricatorOAuthAuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorAuthProvider',
'PhabricatorOAuthClientAuthorization' => array(
'PhabricatorOAuthServerDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorOAuthClientAuthorizationQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorOAuthClientController' => 'PhabricatorOAuthServerController',
'PhabricatorOAuthClientDeleteController' => 'PhabricatorOAuthClientController',
'PhabricatorOAuthClientEditController' => 'PhabricatorOAuthClientController',
'PhabricatorOAuthClientListController' => 'PhabricatorOAuthClientController',
'PhabricatorOAuthClientSecretController' => 'PhabricatorOAuthClientController',
'PhabricatorOAuthClientViewController' => 'PhabricatorOAuthClientController',
OAuth - Phabricator OAuth server and Phabricator client for new Phabricator OAuth Server Summary: adds a Phabricator OAuth server, which has three big commands: - auth - allows $user to authorize a given client or application. if $user has already authorized, it hands an authoization code back to $redirect_uri - token - given a valid authorization code, this command returns an authorization token - whoami - Conduit.whoami, all nice and purdy relative to the oauth server. Also has a "test" handler, which I used to create some test data. T850 will delete this as it adds the ability to create this data in the Phabricator product. This diff also adds the corresponding client in Phabricator for the Phabricator OAuth Server. (Note that clients are known as "providers" in the Phabricator codebase but client makes more sense relative to the server nomenclature) Also, related to make this work well - clean up the diagnostics page by variabilizing the provider-specific information and extending the provider classes as appropriate. - augment Conduit.whoami for more full-featured OAuth support, at least where the Phabricator client is concerned What's missing here... See T844, T848, T849, T850, and T852. Test Plan: - created a dummy client via the test handler. setup development.conf to have have proper variables for this dummy client. went through authorization and de-authorization flows - viewed the diagnostics page for all known oauth providers and saw provider-specific debugging information Reviewers: epriestley CC: aran, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T44, T797 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1595
2012-02-04 01:21:40 +01:00
'PhabricatorOAuthResponse' => 'AphrontResponse',
'PhabricatorOAuthServer' => 'Phobject',
OAuth - Phabricator OAuth server and Phabricator client for new Phabricator OAuth Server Summary: adds a Phabricator OAuth server, which has three big commands: - auth - allows $user to authorize a given client or application. if $user has already authorized, it hands an authoization code back to $redirect_uri - token - given a valid authorization code, this command returns an authorization token - whoami - Conduit.whoami, all nice and purdy relative to the oauth server. Also has a "test" handler, which I used to create some test data. T850 will delete this as it adds the ability to create this data in the Phabricator product. This diff also adds the corresponding client in Phabricator for the Phabricator OAuth Server. (Note that clients are known as "providers" in the Phabricator codebase but client makes more sense relative to the server nomenclature) Also, related to make this work well - clean up the diagnostics page by variabilizing the provider-specific information and extending the provider classes as appropriate. - augment Conduit.whoami for more full-featured OAuth support, at least where the Phabricator client is concerned What's missing here... See T844, T848, T849, T850, and T852. Test Plan: - created a dummy client via the test handler. setup development.conf to have have proper variables for this dummy client. went through authorization and de-authorization flows - viewed the diagnostics page for all known oauth providers and saw provider-specific debugging information Reviewers: epriestley CC: aran, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T44, T797 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1595
2012-02-04 01:21:40 +01:00
'PhabricatorOAuthServerAccessToken' => 'PhabricatorOAuthServerDAO',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerAuthController' => 'PhabricatorOAuthServerController',
OAuth - Phabricator OAuth server and Phabricator client for new Phabricator OAuth Server Summary: adds a Phabricator OAuth server, which has three big commands: - auth - allows $user to authorize a given client or application. if $user has already authorized, it hands an authoization code back to $redirect_uri - token - given a valid authorization code, this command returns an authorization token - whoami - Conduit.whoami, all nice and purdy relative to the oauth server. Also has a "test" handler, which I used to create some test data. T850 will delete this as it adds the ability to create this data in the Phabricator product. This diff also adds the corresponding client in Phabricator for the Phabricator OAuth Server. (Note that clients are known as "providers" in the Phabricator codebase but client makes more sense relative to the server nomenclature) Also, related to make this work well - clean up the diagnostics page by variabilizing the provider-specific information and extending the provider classes as appropriate. - augment Conduit.whoami for more full-featured OAuth support, at least where the Phabricator client is concerned What's missing here... See T844, T848, T849, T850, and T852. Test Plan: - created a dummy client via the test handler. setup development.conf to have have proper variables for this dummy client. went through authorization and de-authorization flows - viewed the diagnostics page for all known oauth providers and saw provider-specific debugging information Reviewers: epriestley CC: aran, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T44, T797 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1595
2012-02-04 01:21:40 +01:00
'PhabricatorOAuthServerAuthorizationCode' => 'PhabricatorOAuthServerDAO',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerAuthorizationsSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerClient' => array(
'PhabricatorOAuthServerDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'PhabricatorOAuthServerClientAuthorizationPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerClientPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerClientQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerClientSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerCreateClientsCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
OAuth - Phabricator OAuth server and Phabricator client for new Phabricator OAuth Server Summary: adds a Phabricator OAuth server, which has three big commands: - auth - allows $user to authorize a given client or application. if $user has already authorized, it hands an authoization code back to $redirect_uri - token - given a valid authorization code, this command returns an authorization token - whoami - Conduit.whoami, all nice and purdy relative to the oauth server. Also has a "test" handler, which I used to create some test data. T850 will delete this as it adds the ability to create this data in the Phabricator product. This diff also adds the corresponding client in Phabricator for the Phabricator OAuth Server. (Note that clients are known as "providers" in the Phabricator codebase but client makes more sense relative to the server nomenclature) Also, related to make this work well - clean up the diagnostics page by variabilizing the provider-specific information and extending the provider classes as appropriate. - augment Conduit.whoami for more full-featured OAuth support, at least where the Phabricator client is concerned What's missing here... See T844, T848, T849, T850, and T852. Test Plan: - created a dummy client via the test handler. setup development.conf to have have proper variables for this dummy client. went through authorization and de-authorization flows - viewed the diagnostics page for all known oauth providers and saw provider-specific debugging information Reviewers: epriestley CC: aran, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T44, T797 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1595
2012-02-04 01:21:40 +01:00
'PhabricatorOAuthServerDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerScope' => 'Phobject',
OAuthServer polish and random sauce Summary: This diff makes the OAuthServer more compliant with the spec by - making it return well-formatted error codes with error types from the spec. - making it respect the "state" variable, which is a transparent variable the client passes and the server passes back - making it be super, duper compliant with respect to redirect uris -- if specified in authorization step, check if its valid relative to the client registered URI and if so save it -- if specified in authorization step, check if its been specified in the access step and error if it doesn't match or doesn't exist -- note we don't make any use of it in the access step which seems strange but hey, that's what the spec says! This diff makes the OAuthServer suck less by - making the "cancel" button do something in the user authorization flow - making the client list view and client edit view be a bit more usable around client secrets - fixing a few bugs I managed to introduce along the way Test Plan: - create a test phabricator client, updated my conf, and then linked and unlinked phabricator to itself - wrote some tests for PhabricatorOAuthServer -- they pass! -- these validate the various validate URI checks - tried a few important authorization calls -- http://phabricator.dev/oauthserver/auth/?client_id=X&state=test&redirect_uri=http://www.evil.com --- verified error'd from mismatching redirect uri's --- verified state parameter in response --- verified did not redirect to client redirect uri -- http://phabricator.dev/oauthserver/auth/?client_id=X w/ existing authorization --- got redirected to proper client url with error that response_type not specified -- http://phabricator.dev/oauthserver/auth/?client_id=X&response_type=code w/ existing authorization --- got redirected to proper client url with pertinent code! - tried a few important access calls -- verified appropriate errors if missing any required parameters -- verified good access code with appropriate other variables resulted in an access token - verified that if redirect_uri set correctly in authorization required for access and errors if differs at all / only succeeds if exactly the same Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley CC: aran, epriestley, ajtrichards Maniphest Tasks: T889, T906, T897 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1727
2012-03-01 23:46:18 +01:00
'PhabricatorOAuthServerTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerTestController' => 'PhabricatorOAuthServerController',
'PhabricatorOAuthServerTokenController' => 'PhabricatorOAuthServerController',
'PhabricatorObjectHandle' => array(
'Phobject',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorObjectHasAsanaSubtaskEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorObjectHasAsanaTaskEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorObjectHasContributorEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorObjectHasFileEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorObjectHasJiraIssueEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorObjectHasSubscriberEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorObjectHasUnsubscriberEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorObjectHasWatcherEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorObjectListQuery' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorObjectListQueryTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorMailReceiver',
'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiverTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorObjectMentionedByObjectEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorObjectMentionsObjectEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorObjectQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule' => 'PhutilRemarkupRule',
'PhabricatorObjectSelectorDialog' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorObjectUsesCredentialsEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorOffsetPagedQuery' => 'PhabricatorQuery',
'PhabricatorOneTimeTriggerClock' => 'PhabricatorTriggerClock',
'PhabricatorOpcodeCacheSpec' => 'PhabricatorCacheSpec',
'PhabricatorOwnerPathQuery' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorOwnersApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorOwnersArchiveController' => 'PhabricatorOwnersController',
'PhabricatorOwnersConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorOwnersConfiguredCustomField' => array(
'PhabricatorOwnersCustomField',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldInterface',
),
2011-04-03 23:48:36 +02:00
'PhabricatorOwnersController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorOwnersCustomField' => 'PhabricatorCustomField',
'PhabricatorOwnersCustomFieldNumericIndex' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldNumericIndexStorage',
'PhabricatorOwnersCustomFieldStorage' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldStorage',
'PhabricatorOwnersCustomFieldStringIndex' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldStringIndexStorage',
2011-04-03 23:48:36 +02:00
'PhabricatorOwnersDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorOwnersDetailController' => 'PhabricatorOwnersController',
2011-04-04 07:03:27 +02:00
'PhabricatorOwnersEditController' => 'PhabricatorOwnersController',
2011-04-03 23:48:36 +02:00
'PhabricatorOwnersListController' => 'PhabricatorOwnersController',
'PhabricatorOwnersOwner' => 'PhabricatorOwnersDAO',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackage' => array(
'PhabricatorOwnersDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorConduitResultInterface',
Add PhabricatorOwnersPackageQuery Summary: This is a step toward unearthing Project queries enough that I can make them policy-aware. Right now, some ProjectQuery callsites do not have reasonable access to the viewer. In particular, Owners packages need to issue Project queries because we allow projects to own packages and resolve project members inside of some package queries. Currently, we have a very unmodern approach to querying packages, with a large number of one-off static load methods: PhabricatorOwnersPackage::loadAffectedPackages() PhabricatorOwnersPackage::loadOwningPackages() PhabricatorOwnersPackage::loadPackagesForPaths() PhabricatorOwnersOwner::loadAllForPackages() PhabricatorOwnersOwner::loadAffiliatedUserPHIDs() PhabricatorOwnersOwner::loadAffiliatedPackages() ConduitAPI_owners_query_Method::queryAll() ConduitAPI_owners_query_Method::queryByOwner() ConduitAPI_owners_query_Method::queryByAffiliatedUser() ConduitAPI_owners_query_Method::queryByPath() We should replace `PhabricatorOwnersOwner` with an Edge and move all of these calls to a Query class. I'm going to try to do as little of this work as I can for now since I'm much more interested in getting a functional policy implementation into other applications, but ProjectQuery needs to be policy-aware before I can do that and I need to dig some at least some of the callsites out enough that I can get a viewer in there without making the code worse than it is. This adds a PhabricatorOwnersPackageQuery class and removes one callsite of one of those static methods. I also intend to dissolve the two separate concepts of an "owner" (direct owner) and an "affiliated user" (indirect owner via project membership) since I think we're always fine with "affiliated users" owners. Test Plan: Loaded home page / audit tool, which use the modified path. Ran queries manually via script. Made sure results included directly owned packages and packages owned through project membership. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, meitros Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T603 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3193
2012-08-08 21:25:11 +02:00
),
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageEditEngine' => 'PhabricatorEditEngine',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageFunctionDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageOwnerDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackagePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageTransactionEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorOwnersPackageTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
2011-04-03 23:48:36 +02:00
'PhabricatorOwnersPath' => 'PhabricatorOwnersDAO',
'PhabricatorOwnersPathsController' => 'PhabricatorOwnersController',
'PhabricatorOwnersSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhabricatorOwnersSearchField' => 'PhabricatorSearchTokenizerField',
'PhabricatorPHDConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorPHID' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorPHIDConstants' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorPHIDListEditField' => 'PhabricatorEditField',
'PhabricatorPHIDListEditType' => 'PhabricatorEditType',
'PhabricatorPHIDResolver' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorPHIDType' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorPHIDTypeTestCase' => 'PhutilTestCase',
'PhabricatorPHPASTApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorPHPConfigSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorPHPMailerConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorPagedFormUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PhabricatorPagerUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PhabricatorPassphraseApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorPasswordAuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorAuthProvider',
'PhabricatorPasswordHasher' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorPasswordHasherTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorPasswordHasherUnavailableException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorPasswordSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorPaste' => array(
'PhabricatorPasteDAO',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorMentionableInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorSpacesInterface',
'PhabricatorConduitResultInterface',
),
'PhabricatorPasteApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorPasteArchiveController' => 'PhabricatorPasteController',
'PhabricatorPasteConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorPasteController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorPasteDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorPasteEditController' => 'PhabricatorPasteController',
Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured Summary: Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs. Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like: - "New Bug Report" - "New Feature Request" These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments: - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report"). - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies). - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden. - A form might have a different field order. - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it. This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way". This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future. Test Plan: ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form: {F959025} There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines: {F959030} And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it: {F959038} The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-04 21:52:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorPasteEditEngine' => 'PhabricatorEditEngine',
'PhabricatorPasteEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorPasteListController' => 'PhabricatorPasteController',
'PhabricatorPastePastePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorPasteQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorPasteRawController' => 'PhabricatorPasteController',
'PhabricatorPasteRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'PhabricatorPasteSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhabricatorPasteSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorPasteSnippet' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorPasteTestDataGenerator' => 'PhabricatorTestDataGenerator',
'PhabricatorPasteTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorPasteTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'PhabricatorPasteTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorPasteViewController' => 'PhabricatorPasteController',
'PhabricatorPathSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorPeopleAnyOwnerDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'PhabricatorPeopleApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorPeopleApproveController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleController',
'PhabricatorPeopleCalendarController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleController',
2011-01-24 03:09:16 +01:00
'PhabricatorPeopleController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorPeopleCreateController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleController',
Modernize "users" typeahead datasource Summary: Ref T4420. Modernize users. Test Plan: - Edited "Commit Authors" on Audit search. - Edited "Created By" on calendar search. - Edited "invited" on calendar search. - Edited "To" on "New conpherence message". - Edited user on "Add user to conpherence thread". - Edited "Authors" on countdown search. - Edited "Author" on differential search. - Edited "Responsible users" on differential search. - Edited "Owner" on Diffusion lint search. - Edited "include users" on Feed search. - Edited "Authors" on file search. - Edited "Authors" on Herald rule search. - Edited a couple of user-selecting Herald fields on rules. - Edited "user" on legalpad signature exemption. - Edited "creator" on legalpad search. - Edited "contributors" on legalpad search. - Edited "signers" on legalpad signature search. - Edited "Authors" on macro search. - Edited "Reassign/claim" on task detail. - Edited "assigned to" on task edit. - Edited "assigned to", "users projects", "authors" on task search. - Edited "creators" on oauthserver. - Edited "authors" on paste search. - Edited "actors" and "users" on activity log search. - Edited "authors" on pholio search. - Edited "users" on phrequent search. - Edited "authors", "answered by" on Ponder search. - Edited "add members" on project membership editor. - Edited "members" on project search. - Edited "pushers" on releeph product edit. - Edited "requestors" on releeph request search. - Edited "pushers" on diffusion push log. - Edited "authors", "owners", "subscribers" on global search. - Edited "authors" on slowvote search. - Edited users in custom policy. - Grepped for "common/authors", no hits. - Grepped for "common/users", no (relevant) hits. - Grepped for "common/accounts", no (relevant) hits. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4420 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9885
2014-07-18 00:44:18 +02:00
'PhabricatorPeopleDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'PhabricatorPeopleDeleteController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleController',
'PhabricatorPeopleDisableController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleController',
'PhabricatorPeopleEmpowerController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleController',
'PhabricatorPeopleExternalPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorPeopleHovercardEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
'PhabricatorPeopleInviteController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleController',
'PhabricatorPeopleInviteListController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleInviteController',
'PhabricatorPeopleInviteSendController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleInviteController',
2012-07-04 04:10:38 +02:00
'PhabricatorPeopleLdapController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleController',
'PhabricatorPeopleListController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleController',
'PhabricatorPeopleLogQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorPeopleLogSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorPeopleLogsController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleController',
'PhabricatorPeopleNewController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleController',
'PhabricatorPeopleNoOwnerDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'PhabricatorPeopleOwnerDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
2011-01-24 03:09:16 +01:00
'PhabricatorPeopleProfileController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleController',
'PhabricatorPeopleProfileEditController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleController',
'PhabricatorPeopleProfilePictureController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleController',
'PhabricatorPeopleQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorPeopleRenameController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleController',
'PhabricatorPeopleSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorPeopleTestDataGenerator' => 'PhabricatorTestDataGenerator',
'PhabricatorPeopleTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorPeopleUserFunctionDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'PhabricatorPeopleUserPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorPeopleWelcomeController' => 'PhabricatorPeopleController',
'PhabricatorPersonaAuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorAuthProvider',
'PhabricatorPhabricatorAuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorOAuth2AuthProvider',
'PhabricatorPhameApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorPhameBlogPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorPhamePostPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorPhluxApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorPholioApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorPholioConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorPholioMockTestDataGenerator' => 'PhabricatorTestDataGenerator',
'PhabricatorPhortuneApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorPhortuneManagementInvoiceWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorPhortuneManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorPhortuneManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorPhragmentApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorPhrequentApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorPhrequentConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorPhrictionApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorPhrictionConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorPhurlApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorPhurlConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorPhurlController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorPhurlDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorPhurlLinkRemarkupRule' => 'PhutilRemarkupRule',
'PhabricatorPhurlRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'PhabricatorPhurlSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhabricatorPhurlShortURLController' => 'PhabricatorPhurlController',
'PhabricatorPhurlShortURLDefaultController' => 'PhabricatorPhurlController',
'PhabricatorPhurlURL' => array(
'PhabricatorPhurlDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorMentionableInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorSpacesInterface',
),
'PhabricatorPhurlURLAccessController' => 'PhabricatorPhurlController',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLCommentController' => 'PhabricatorPhurlController',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLCreateCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLEditController' => 'PhabricatorPhurlController',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLListController' => 'PhabricatorPhurlController',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorPhurlURLViewController' => 'PhabricatorPhurlController',
'PhabricatorPlatformSite' => 'PhabricatorSite',
Add basic per-object privacy policies Summary: Provides a basic start for access policies. Objects expose various capabilities, like CAN_VIEW, CAN_EDIT, etc., and set a policy for each capability. We currently implement three policies, PUBLIC (anyone, including logged-out), USERS (any logged-in) and NOONE (nobody). There's also a way to provide automatic capability grants (e.g., the owner of an object can always see it, even if some capability is set to "NOONE"), but I'm not sure how great the implementation feels and it might change. Most of the code here is providing a primitive for efficient policy-aware list queries. The problem with doing queries naively is that you have to do crazy amounts of filtering, e.g. to show the user page 6, you need to filter at least 600 objects (and likely more) before you can figure out which ones are 500-600 for them. You can't just do "LIMIT 500, 100" because that might have only 50 results, or no results. Instead, the query looks like "WHERE id > last_visible_id", and then we fetch additional pages as necessary to satisfy the request. The general idea is that we move all data access to Query classes and have them do object filtering. The ID paging primitive allows efficient paging in most cases, and the executeOne() method provides a concise way to do policy checks for edit/view screens. We'll probably end up with mostly broader policy UIs or configuration-based policies, but there are at least a few cases for per-object privacy (e.g., marking tasks as "Security", and restricting things to the members of projects) so I figured we'd start with a flexible primitive and the simplify it in the UI where we can. Test Plan: Unit tests, played around in the UI with various policy settings. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T603 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2210
2012-04-14 19:13:29 +02:00
'PhabricatorPolicies' => 'PhabricatorPolicyConstants',
'PhabricatorPolicy' => array(
'PhabricatorPolicyDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'PhabricatorPolicyApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorPolicyAwareQuery' => 'PhabricatorOffsetPagedQuery',
'PhabricatorPolicyAwareTestQuery' => 'PhabricatorPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorPolicyCanEditCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PhabricatorPolicyCanJoinCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PhabricatorPolicyCanViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PhabricatorPolicyCapability' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorPolicyCapabilityTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorPolicyConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorPolicyConstants' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorPolicyController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorPolicyDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyDataTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorPolicyEditController' => 'PhabricatorPolicyController',
'PhabricatorPolicyEditEngineExtension' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineExtension',
Implement a basic version of ApplicationEditor in Paste Summary: Ref T9132. Ref T4768. This is a rough v0 of ApplicationEditor, which replaces the edit workflow in Paste. This mostly looks and works like ApplicationSearch, and is heavily modeled on it. Roughly, we define a set of editable fields and the ApplicationEditor stuff builds everything else. This has no functional changes, except: - I removed "Fork Paste" since I don't think it's particularly useful now that pastes are editable. We could restore it if users miss it. - Subscribers are now editable. - Form field order is a little goofy (this will be fixed in a future diff). - Subscribers and projects are now race-resistant. The race-resistance works like this: instead of submitting just the new value ("subscribers=apple, dog") and doing a set operation ("set subscribers = apple, dog"), we submit the old and new values ("original=apple" + "new=apple, dog") then apply the user's changes as an add + remove ("add=dog", "remove=<none>"). This means that two users who do "Edit Paste" at around the same time and each add or remove a couple of subscribers won't overwrite each other, unless they actually add or remove the exact same subscribers (in which case their edits legitimately conflict). Previously, the last user to save would win, and whatever was in their field would overwrite the prior state, potentially losing the first user's edits. Test Plan: - Created pastes. - Created pastes via API. - Edited pastes. - Edited every field. - Opened a paste in two windows and did project/subscriber edits in each, saved in arbitrary order, had edits respected. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14390
2015-11-03 03:58:32 +01:00
'PhabricatorPolicyEditField' => 'PhabricatorEditField',
'PhabricatorPolicyException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorPolicyExplainController' => 'PhabricatorPolicyController',
'PhabricatorPolicyFilter' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface' => 'PhabricatorPHIDInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyManagementShowWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorPolicyManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorPolicyManagementUnlockWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorPolicyManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorPolicyManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorPolicyPHIDTypePolicy' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorPolicyQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorPolicyRequestExceptionHandler' => 'PhabricatorRequestExceptionHandler',
'PhabricatorPolicyRule' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorPolicySearchEngineExtension' => 'PhabricatorSearchEngineExtension',
Add basic per-object privacy policies Summary: Provides a basic start for access policies. Objects expose various capabilities, like CAN_VIEW, CAN_EDIT, etc., and set a policy for each capability. We currently implement three policies, PUBLIC (anyone, including logged-out), USERS (any logged-in) and NOONE (nobody). There's also a way to provide automatic capability grants (e.g., the owner of an object can always see it, even if some capability is set to "NOONE"), but I'm not sure how great the implementation feels and it might change. Most of the code here is providing a primitive for efficient policy-aware list queries. The problem with doing queries naively is that you have to do crazy amounts of filtering, e.g. to show the user page 6, you need to filter at least 600 objects (and likely more) before you can figure out which ones are 500-600 for them. You can't just do "LIMIT 500, 100" because that might have only 50 results, or no results. Instead, the query looks like "WHERE id > last_visible_id", and then we fetch additional pages as necessary to satisfy the request. The general idea is that we move all data access to Query classes and have them do object filtering. The ID paging primitive allows efficient paging in most cases, and the executeOne() method provides a concise way to do policy checks for edit/view screens. We'll probably end up with mostly broader policy UIs or configuration-based policies, but there are at least a few cases for per-object privacy (e.g., marking tasks as "Security", and restricting things to the members of projects) so I figured we'd start with a flexible primitive and the simplify it in the UI where we can. Test Plan: Unit tests, played around in the UI with various policy settings. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T603 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2210
2012-04-14 19:13:29 +02:00
'PhabricatorPolicyTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorPolicyTestObject' => array(
'Phobject',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorExtendedPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorPolicyType' => 'PhabricatorPolicyConstants',
'PhabricatorPonderApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorProject' => array(
'PhabricatorProjectDAO',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
2012-08-10 00:42:44 +02:00
),
'PhabricatorProjectAddHeraldAction' => 'PhabricatorProjectHeraldAction',
'PhabricatorProjectApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorProjectArchiveController' => 'PhabricatorProjectController',
'PhabricatorProjectBoardController' => 'PhabricatorProjectController',
'PhabricatorProjectBoardImportController' => 'PhabricatorProjectBoardController',
'PhabricatorProjectBoardReorderController' => 'PhabricatorProjectBoardController',
'PhabricatorProjectBoardViewController' => 'PhabricatorProjectBoardController',
'PhabricatorProjectColumn' => array(
'PhabricatorProjectDAO',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'PhabricatorProjectColumnDetailController' => 'PhabricatorProjectBoardController',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnEditController' => 'PhabricatorProjectBoardController',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnHideController' => 'PhabricatorProjectBoardController',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnPosition' => array(
'PhabricatorProjectDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorProjectColumnPositionQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnTransactionEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorProjectColumnTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorProjectConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorProjectConfiguredCustomField' => array(
'PhabricatorProjectStandardCustomField',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldInterface',
),
'PhabricatorProjectController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorProjectCustomField' => 'PhabricatorCustomField',
'PhabricatorProjectCustomFieldNumericIndex' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldNumericIndexStorage',
'PhabricatorProjectCustomFieldStorage' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldStorage',
'PhabricatorProjectCustomFieldStringIndex' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldStringIndexStorage',
'PhabricatorProjectDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorProjectDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'PhabricatorProjectDescriptionField' => 'PhabricatorProjectStandardCustomField',
'PhabricatorProjectEditDetailsController' => 'PhabricatorProjectController',
'PhabricatorProjectEditIconController' => 'PhabricatorProjectController',
'PhabricatorProjectEditPictureController' => 'PhabricatorProjectController',
'PhabricatorProjectEditorTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorProjectFeedController' => 'PhabricatorProjectController',
'PhabricatorProjectHeraldAction' => 'HeraldAction',
'PhabricatorProjectIcon' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorProjectListController' => 'PhabricatorProjectController',
'PhabricatorProjectLogicalAndDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'PhabricatorProjectLogicalDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'PhabricatorProjectLogicalOrNotDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'PhabricatorProjectLogicalUserDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'PhabricatorProjectLogicalViewerDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'PhabricatorProjectMemberOfProjectEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorProjectMembersDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'PhabricatorProjectMembersEditController' => 'PhabricatorProjectController',
'PhabricatorProjectMembersRemoveController' => 'PhabricatorProjectController',
'PhabricatorProjectMoveController' => 'PhabricatorProjectController',
'PhabricatorProjectNoProjectsDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'PhabricatorProjectObjectHasProjectEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorProjectOrUserDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'PhabricatorProjectOrUserFunctionDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'PhabricatorProjectPHIDResolver' => 'PhabricatorPHIDResolver',
'PhabricatorProjectProfileController' => 'PhabricatorProjectController',
'PhabricatorProjectProjectHasMemberEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorProjectProjectHasObjectEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorProjectProjectPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorProjectQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorProjectRemoveHeraldAction' => 'PhabricatorProjectHeraldAction',
'PhabricatorProjectSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhabricatorProjectSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorProjectSearchField' => 'PhabricatorSearchTokenizerField',
'PhabricatorProjectSearchIndexer' => 'PhabricatorSearchDocumentIndexer',
'PhabricatorProjectSlug' => 'PhabricatorProjectDAO',
'PhabricatorProjectStandardCustomField' => array(
'PhabricatorProjectCustomField',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldInterface',
),
'PhabricatorProjectStatus' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorProjectTestDataGenerator' => 'PhabricatorTestDataGenerator',
'PhabricatorProjectTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorProjectTransactionEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorProjectTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorProjectUIEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
'PhabricatorProjectUpdateController' => 'PhabricatorProjectController',
'PhabricatorProjectUserFunctionDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'PhabricatorProjectViewController' => 'PhabricatorProjectController',
'PhabricatorProjectWatchController' => 'PhabricatorProjectController',
'PhabricatorProjectsEditEngineExtension' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineExtension',
'PhabricatorProjectsEditField' => 'PhabricatorTokenizerEditField',
'PhabricatorProjectsPolicyRule' => 'PhabricatorPolicyRule',
'PhabricatorProjectsSearchEngineExtension' => 'PhabricatorSearchEngineExtension',
'PhabricatorProtocolAdapter' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorPygmentSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorQuery' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorQueryConstraint' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorQueryOrderItem' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorQueryOrderTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorQueryOrderVector' => array(
'Phobject',
'Iterator',
),
'PhabricatorRateLimitRequestExceptionHandler' => 'PhabricatorRequestExceptionHandler',
'PhabricatorRecaptchaConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorRecipientHasBadgeEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorRedirectController' => 'PhabricatorController',
Fix conservative CSRF token cycling limit Summary: We currently cycle CSRF tokens every hour and check for the last two valid ones. This means that a form could go stale in as little as an hour, and is certainly stale after two. When a stale form is submitted, you basically get a terrible heisen-state where some of your data might persist if you're lucky but more likely it all just vanishes. The .js file below outlines some more details. This is a pretty terrible UX and we don't need to be as conservative about CSRF validation as we're being. Remedy this problem by: - Accepting the last 6 CSRF tokens instead of the last 1 (i.e., pages are valid for at least 6 hours, and for as long as 7). - Using JS to refresh the CSRF token every 55 minutes (i.e., pages connected to the internet are valid indefinitely). - Showing the user an explicit message about what went wrong when CSRF validation fails so the experience is less bewildering. They should now only be able to submit with a bad CSRF token if: - They load a page, disconnect from the internet for 7 hours, reconnect, and submit the form within 55 minutes; or - They are actually the victim of a CSRF attack. We could eventually fix the first one by tracking reconnects, which might be "free" once the notification server gets built. It will probably never be an issue in practice. Test Plan: - Reduced CSRF cycle frequency to 2 seconds, submitted a form after 15 seconds, got the CSRF exception. - Reduced csrf-refresh cycle frequency to 3 seconds, submitted a form after 15 seconds, got a clean form post. - Added debugging code the the csrf refresh to make sure it was doing sensible things (pulling different tokens, finding all the inputs). Reviewed By: aran Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran CC: aran, epriestley Differential Revision: 660
2011-07-13 23:05:18 +02:00
'PhabricatorRefreshCSRFController' => 'PhabricatorAuthController',
New Registration Workflow Summary: Currently, registration and authentication are pretty messy. Two concrete problems: - The `PhabricatorLDAPRegistrationController` and `PhabricatorOAuthDefaultRegistrationController` controllers are giant copy/pastes of one another. This is really bad. - We can't practically implement OpenID because we can't reissue the authentication request. Additionally, the OAuth registration controller can be replaced wholesale by config, which is a huge API surface area and a giant mess. Broadly, the problem right now is that registration does too much: we hand it some set of indirect credentials (like OAuth tokens) and expect it to take those the entire way to a registered user. Instead, break registration into smaller steps: - User authenticates with remote service. - Phabricator pulls information (remote account ID, username, email, real name, profile picture, etc) from the remote service and saves it as `PhabricatorUserCredentials`. - Phabricator hands the `PhabricatorUserCredentials` to the registration form, which is agnostic about where they originate from: it can process LDAP credentials, OAuth credentials, plain old email credentials, HTTP basic auth credentials, etc. This doesn't do anything yet -- there is no way to create credentials objects (and no storage patch), but I wanted to get any initial feedback, especially about the event call for T2394. In particular, I think the implementation would look something like this: $profile = $event->getValue('profile') $username = $profile->getDefaultUsername(); $is_employee = is_this_a_facebook_employee($username); if (!$is_employee) { throw new Exception("You are not employed at Facebook."); } $fbid = get_fbid_for_facebook_username($username); $profile->setDefaultEmail($fbid); $profile->setCanEditUsername(false); $profile->setCanEditEmail(false); $profile->setCanEditRealName(false); $profile->setShouldVerifyEmail(true); Seem reasonable? Test Plan: N/A yet, probably fatals. Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, codeblock, chad Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, asherkin, nh, wez Maniphest Tasks: T1536, T2394 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4647
2013-06-16 19:13:49 +02:00
'PhabricatorRegistrationProfile' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorReleephApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorReleephApplicationConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorRemarkupControl' => 'AphrontFormTextAreaControl',
'PhabricatorRemarkupCowsayBlockInterpreter' => 'PhutilRemarkupBlockInterpreter',
'PhabricatorRemarkupCustomBlockRule' => 'PhutilRemarkupBlockRule',
'PhabricatorRemarkupCustomInlineRule' => 'PhutilRemarkupRule',
'PhabricatorRemarkupEditField' => 'PhabricatorEditField',
'PhabricatorRemarkupFigletBlockInterpreter' => 'PhutilRemarkupBlockInterpreter',
'PhabricatorRemarkupUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PhabricatorRepositoriesSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorRepository' => array(
'PhabricatorRepositoryDAO',
Transactions - deploy buildTransactionTimeline to remaining applications Summary: Ref T4712. Specifically... - Differential - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Audit - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Repository - one object needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) - Ponder - BONUS BUG FIX - leaving a comment on an answer had a bad redirect URI - both PonderQuestion and PonderAnswer needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on both "history" controllers - left a "TODO" on buildAnswers on the question view controller, which is non-standard and should be re-written eventually - Phortune - BONUS BUG FIX - fix new user "createNewAccount" code to not fatal - PhortuneAccount, PhortuneMerchant, and PhortuneCart needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on Account view, merchant view, and cart view controller - Fund - Legalpad - Nuance - NuanceSource needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Releeph (this product is kind of a mess...) - HACKQUEST - had to manually create an arcanist project to even be able to make a "product" and get started...! - BONUS BUG FIX - make sure to "setName" on product edit - ReleephProject (should be ReleepProduct...?), ReleephBranch, and ReleepRequest needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Harbormaster - HarbormasterBuildable, HarbormasterBuild, HarbormasterBuildPlan, and HarbormasterBuildStep all needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) all over the place Test Plan: foreach application, viewed the timeline(s) and made sure they still rendered Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4712 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10925
2014-12-04 00:35:47 +01:00
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
'PhabricatorSpacesInterface',
),
'PhabricatorRepositoryAuditRequest' => array(
'PhabricatorRepositoryDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorRepositoryBranch' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryDAO',
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommit' => array(
'PhabricatorRepositoryDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorMentionableInterface',
'HarbormasterBuildableInterface',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
),
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitChangeParserWorker' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitParserWorker',
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitData' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryDAO',
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitHeraldWorker' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitParserWorker',
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitMessageParserWorker' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitParserWorker',
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitOwnersWorker' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitParserWorker',
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitParserWorker' => 'PhabricatorWorker',
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitRef' => 'Phobject',
Improve Search architecture Summary: The search indexing API has several problems right now: - Always runs in-process. - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it. - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster. - Instead, make the API phid-oriented. - No uniform indexing API. - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird. - Instead, provide a uniform API. - No uniform CLI. - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers. - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing. - Not application-oriented. - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world. - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader. Test Plan: - `bin/search index` - Indexed one revision, one task. - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types. - Indexed `--all`. - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it. - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing. - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing. - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: 20after4, aran Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 23:21:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitSearchIndexer' => 'PhabricatorSearchDocumentIndexer',
'PhabricatorRepositoryConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorRepositoryDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorRepositoryDiscoveryEngine' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryEngine',
'PhabricatorRepositoryEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorRepositoryEngine' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorRepositoryGitCommitChangeParserWorker' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitChangeParserWorker',
'PhabricatorRepositoryGitCommitMessageParserWorker' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitMessageParserWorker',
'PhabricatorRepositoryGraphCache' => 'Phobject',
Move Git discovery into DiscoveryEngine Summary: Ref T4327. Consolidates and simplifies infrastructure: - Moves Git discovery into DiscoveryEngine. - Collapses a bunch of the Git and Mercurial code related to stream discovery. - Removes all cach code from PullLocal daemon (it's no longer called). - Adds basic unit tests for Git and Mercurial discovery. Various cleanup: - Makes GitStream and MercurialStream extend a common base. - Improves performance of MercurialStream in some cases, by requiring fewer commits be output and parsed. - Makes mirroring exceptions easier to debug. - Fixes discovery of Mercurial repositories with multiple branch heads. - Adds some missing `pht()`. Test Plan: I tested this fairly throughly because I think this phase is complete: - Made new repositories in multiple VCSes and did full imports. - Particularly, I reimported Arcanist to make sure that TODO was resolved. I think it was related to the toposort stuff. - Pushed commits to multiple VCSes. - Pushed commits to a non-close branch, then pushed a merge commit. Observed commits import initially as non-close, then get flagged for close. - Started full daemons and resolved various minor issues that showed up in the daemon log until everything ran cleanly. - Basically spent about 30 minutes banging on this in every way I could think of to try to break it. I found and fixed some minor stuff, but it seems solid. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T4327 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7987
2014-01-17 00:31:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorRepositoryGraphStream' => 'Phobject',
Implement a chunked, APC-backed graph cache Summary: Ref T2683. This is a refinement and simplification of D5257. In particular: - D5257 only cached the commit chain, not path changes. This meant that we had to go issue an awkward query (which was slow on Facebook's install) periodically while reading the cache. This was reasonable locally but killed performance at FB scale. Instead, we can include path information in the cache. It is very rare that this is large except in Subversion, and we do not need to use this cache in Subversion. In other VCSes, the scale of this data is quite small (a handful of bytes per commit on average). - D5257 required a large, slow offline computation step. This relies on D9044 to populate parent data so we can build the cache online at will, and let it expire with normal LRU/LFU/whatever semantics. We need this parent data for other reasons anyway. - D5257 separated graph chunks per-repository. This change assumes we'll be able to pull stuff from APC most of the time and that the cost of switching chunks is not very large, so we can just build one chunk cache across all repositories. This allows the cache to be simpler. - D5257 needed an offline cache, and used a unique cache structure. Since this one can be built online it can mostly use normal cache code. - This also supports online appends to the cache. - Finally, this has a timeout to guarantee a ceiling on the worst case: the worst case is something like a query for a file that has never existed, in a repository which receives exactly 1 commit every time other repositories receive 4095 commits, on a cold cache. If we hit cases like this we can bail after warming the cache up a bit and fall back to asking the VCS for an answer. This cache isn't perfect, but I believe it will give us substantial gains in the average case. It can often satisfy "average-looking" queries in 4-8ms, and pathological-ish queries in 20ms on my machine; `hg` usually can't even start up in less than 100ms. The major thing that's attractive about this approach is that it does not require anything external or complicated, and will "just work", even producing reasonble improvements for users without APC. In followups, I'll modify queries to use this cache and see if it holds up in more realistic workloads. Test Plan: - Used `bin/repository cache` to examine the behavior of this cache. - Did some profiling/testing from the web UI using `debug.php`. - This //appears// to provide a reasonable fast way to issue this query very quickly in the average case, without the various issues that plagued D5257. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley, jhurwitz Maniphest Tasks: T2683 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9045
2014-05-10 19:10:13 +02:00
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementCacheWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementDiscoverWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementEditWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementImportingWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementListPathsWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementListWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow',
Provide a standalone query for resolution of commit author/committer into Phabricator users Summary: Ref T4195. To implement the "Author" and "Committer" rules, I need to resolve author/committer strings into Phabricator users. The code to do this is currently buried in the daemons. Extract it into a standalone query. I also added `bin/repository lookup-users <commit>` to test this query, both to improve confidence I'm getting this right and to provide a diagnostic command for users, since there's occasionally some confusion over how author/committer strings resolve into valid users. Test Plan: I tested this using `bin/repository lookup-users` and `reparse.php --message` on Git, Mercurial and SVN commits. Here's the `lookup-users` output: >>> orbital ~/devtools/phabricator $ ./bin/repository lookup-users rINIS3 Examining commit rINIS3... Raw author string: epriestley Phabricator user: epriestley (Evan Priestley ) Raw committer string: null >>> orbital ~/devtools/phabricator $ ./bin/repository lookup-users rPOEMS165b6c54f487c8 Examining commit rPOEMS165b6c54f487... Raw author string: epriestley <git@epriestley.com> Phabricator user: epriestley (Evan Priestley ) Raw committer string: epriestley <git@epriestley.com> Phabricator user: epriestley (Evan Priestley ) >>> orbital ~/devtools/phabricator $ ./bin/repository lookup-users rINIH6d24c1aee7741e Examining commit rINIH6d24c1aee774... Raw author string: epriestley <hg@yghe.net> Phabricator user: epriestley (Evan Priestley ) Raw committer string: null >>> orbital ~/devtools/phabricator $ The `reparse.php` output was similar, and all VCSes resolved authors correctly. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1731, T4195 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7801
2013-12-19 20:05:17 +01:00
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementLookupUsersWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementMarkImportedWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementMirrorWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementMovePathsWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementParentsWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementPullWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow',
Introduce ref cursors for repository parsing Summary: Ref T4327. I want to make change parsing testable; one thing which is blocking this is that the Git discovery process is still part of `PullLocal` daemon instead of being part of `DiscoveryEngine`. The unit test stuff which I want to use for change parsing relies on `DiscoveryEngine` to discover repositories during unit tests. The major reason git discovery isn't part of `DiscoveryEngine` is that it relies on the messy "autoclose" logic, which we never implemented for Mercurial. Generally, I don't like how autoclose was implemented: it's complicated and gross and too hard to figure out and extend. Instead, I want to do something more similar to what we do for pushes, which is cleaner overall. Basically this means remembering the old branch heads from the last time we parsed a repository, and figuring out what's new by comparing the old and new branch heads. This should give us several advantages: - It should be simpler to understand than the autoclose stuff, which is pretty mind-numbing, at least for me. - It will let us satisfy branch and tag queries cheaply (from the database) instead of having to go to the repository. We could also satisfy some ref-resolve queries from the database. - It should be easier to extend to Mercurial. This implements the basics -- pretty much a table to store the cursors, which we update only for Git for now. Test Plan: - Ran migration. - Ran `bin/repository discover X --trace --verbose` on various repositories with branches and tags, before and after modifying pushes. - Pushed commits to a git repo. - Looked at database tables. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T4327 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7982
2014-01-16 21:05:30 +01:00
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementRefsWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementReparseWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementUpdateWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorRepositoryManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorRepositoryMercurialCommitChangeParserWorker' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitChangeParserWorker',
'PhabricatorRepositoryMercurialCommitMessageParserWorker' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitMessageParserWorker',
'PhabricatorRepositoryMirror' => array(
'PhabricatorRepositoryDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorRepositoryMirrorEngine' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryEngine',
'PhabricatorRepositoryMirrorPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorRepositoryMirrorQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorRepositoryParsedChange' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPullEngine' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryEngine',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPullLocalDaemon' => 'PhabricatorDaemon',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushEvent' => array(
'PhabricatorRepositoryDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushEventPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushEventQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushLog' => array(
'PhabricatorRepositoryDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushLogPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushLogQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushLogSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushMailWorker' => 'PhabricatorWorker',
'PhabricatorRepositoryPushReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorMailReplyHandler',
'PhabricatorRepositoryQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorRepositoryRefCursor' => array(
'PhabricatorRepositoryDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
Introduce ref cursors for repository parsing Summary: Ref T4327. I want to make change parsing testable; one thing which is blocking this is that the Git discovery process is still part of `PullLocal` daemon instead of being part of `DiscoveryEngine`. The unit test stuff which I want to use for change parsing relies on `DiscoveryEngine` to discover repositories during unit tests. The major reason git discovery isn't part of `DiscoveryEngine` is that it relies on the messy "autoclose" logic, which we never implemented for Mercurial. Generally, I don't like how autoclose was implemented: it's complicated and gross and too hard to figure out and extend. Instead, I want to do something more similar to what we do for pushes, which is cleaner overall. Basically this means remembering the old branch heads from the last time we parsed a repository, and figuring out what's new by comparing the old and new branch heads. This should give us several advantages: - It should be simpler to understand than the autoclose stuff, which is pretty mind-numbing, at least for me. - It will let us satisfy branch and tag queries cheaply (from the database) instead of having to go to the repository. We could also satisfy some ref-resolve queries from the database. - It should be easier to extend to Mercurial. This implements the basics -- pretty much a table to store the cursors, which we update only for Git for now. Test Plan: - Ran migration. - Ran `bin/repository discover X --trace --verbose` on various repositories with branches and tags, before and after modifying pushes. - Pushed commits to a git repo. - Looked at database tables. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T4327 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7982
2014-01-16 21:05:30 +01:00
),
'PhabricatorRepositoryRefCursorPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
Introduce ref cursors for repository parsing Summary: Ref T4327. I want to make change parsing testable; one thing which is blocking this is that the Git discovery process is still part of `PullLocal` daemon instead of being part of `DiscoveryEngine`. The unit test stuff which I want to use for change parsing relies on `DiscoveryEngine` to discover repositories during unit tests. The major reason git discovery isn't part of `DiscoveryEngine` is that it relies on the messy "autoclose" logic, which we never implemented for Mercurial. Generally, I don't like how autoclose was implemented: it's complicated and gross and too hard to figure out and extend. Instead, I want to do something more similar to what we do for pushes, which is cleaner overall. Basically this means remembering the old branch heads from the last time we parsed a repository, and figuring out what's new by comparing the old and new branch heads. This should give us several advantages: - It should be simpler to understand than the autoclose stuff, which is pretty mind-numbing, at least for me. - It will let us satisfy branch and tag queries cheaply (from the database) instead of having to go to the repository. We could also satisfy some ref-resolve queries from the database. - It should be easier to extend to Mercurial. This implements the basics -- pretty much a table to store the cursors, which we update only for Git for now. Test Plan: - Ran migration. - Ran `bin/repository discover X --trace --verbose` on various repositories with branches and tags, before and after modifying pushes. - Pushed commits to a git repo. - Looked at database tables. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T4327 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7982
2014-01-16 21:05:30 +01:00
'PhabricatorRepositoryRefCursorQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorRepositoryRefEngine' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryEngine',
'PhabricatorRepositoryRepositoryPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorRepositorySchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhabricatorRepositorySearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorRepositoryStatusMessage' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryDAO',
'PhabricatorRepositorySvnCommitChangeParserWorker' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitChangeParserWorker',
'PhabricatorRepositorySvnCommitMessageParserWorker' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryCommitMessageParserWorker',
'PhabricatorRepositorySymbol' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryDAO',
'PhabricatorRepositoryTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorRepositoryTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorRepositoryTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorRepositoryType' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorRepositoryURINormalizer' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorRepositoryURINormalizerTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorRepositoryURITestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorRepositoryVCSPassword' => 'PhabricatorRepositoryDAO',
'PhabricatorRepositoryVersion' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorRequestExceptionHandler' => 'AphrontRequestExceptionHandler',
'PhabricatorResourceSite' => 'PhabricatorSite',
'PhabricatorRobotsController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorS3FileStorageEngine' => 'PhabricatorFileStorageEngine',
'PhabricatorSMS' => 'PhabricatorSMSDAO',
'PhabricatorSMSConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorSMSDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorSMSDemultiplexWorker' => 'PhabricatorSMSWorker',
'PhabricatorSMSImplementationAdapter' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSMSImplementationTestBlackholeAdapter' => 'PhabricatorSMSImplementationAdapter',
'PhabricatorSMSImplementationTwilioAdapter' => 'PhabricatorSMSImplementationAdapter',
'PhabricatorSMSManagementListOutboundWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorSMSManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorSMSManagementSendTestWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorSMSManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorSMSManagementShowOutboundWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorSMSManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorSMSManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorSMSSendWorker' => 'PhabricatorSMSWorker',
'PhabricatorSMSWorker' => 'PhabricatorWorker',
'PhabricatorSQLPatchList' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSSHKeyGenerator' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSSHKeysSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorSSHLog' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSSHPassthruCommand' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSSHWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorSavedQuery' => array(
'PhabricatorSearchDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorSavedQueryQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorScheduleTaskTriggerAction' => 'PhabricatorTriggerAction',
'PhabricatorScopedEnv' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSearchAbstractDocument' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSearchApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorSearchApplicationSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorSearchApplicationStorageEnginePanel' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigurationPanel',
'PhabricatorSearchAttachController' => 'PhabricatorSearchBaseController',
'PhabricatorSearchBaseController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorSearchCheckboxesField' => 'PhabricatorSearchField',
'PhabricatorSearchConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorSearchController' => 'PhabricatorSearchBaseController',
'PhabricatorSearchCustomFieldProxyField' => 'PhabricatorSearchField',
'PhabricatorSearchDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorSearchDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'PhabricatorSearchDatasourceField' => 'PhabricatorSearchTokenizerField',
'PhabricatorSearchDateControlField' => 'PhabricatorSearchField',
'PhabricatorSearchDateField' => 'PhabricatorSearchField',
'PhabricatorSearchDeleteController' => 'PhabricatorSearchBaseController',
'PhabricatorSearchDocument' => 'PhabricatorSearchDAO',
'PhabricatorSearchDocumentField' => 'PhabricatorSearchDAO',
'PhabricatorSearchDocumentFieldType' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSearchDocumentIndexer' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSearchDocumentQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorSearchDocumentRelationship' => 'PhabricatorSearchDAO',
'PhabricatorSearchDocumentTypeDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'PhabricatorSearchEditController' => 'PhabricatorSearchBaseController',
'PhabricatorSearchEngine' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSearchEngineAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'PhabricatorSearchEngineExtension' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSearchEngineExtensionModule' => 'PhabricatorConfigModule',
'PhabricatorSearchEngineTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorSearchField' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSearchHovercardController' => 'PhabricatorSearchBaseController',
'PhabricatorSearchIndexer' => 'Phobject',
Improve Search architecture Summary: The search indexing API has several problems right now: - Always runs in-process. - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it. - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster. - Instead, make the API phid-oriented. - No uniform indexing API. - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird. - Instead, provide a uniform API. - No uniform CLI. - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers. - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing. - Not application-oriented. - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world. - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader. Test Plan: - `bin/search index` - Indexed one revision, one task. - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types. - Indexed `--all`. - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it. - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing. - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing. - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: 20after4, aran Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 23:21:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorSearchManagementIndexWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorSearchManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorSearchManagementInitWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorSearchManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorSearchManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorSearchOrderController' => 'PhabricatorSearchBaseController',
'PhabricatorSearchOrderField' => 'PhabricatorSearchField',
'PhabricatorSearchPreferencesSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorSearchRelationship' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSearchResultView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorSearchSelectController' => 'PhabricatorSearchBaseController',
'PhabricatorSearchSelectField' => 'PhabricatorSearchField',
'PhabricatorSearchStringListField' => 'PhabricatorSearchField',
'PhabricatorSearchSubscribersField' => 'PhabricatorSearchTokenizerField',
'PhabricatorSearchTextField' => 'PhabricatorSearchField',
'PhabricatorSearchThreeStateField' => 'PhabricatorSearchField',
'PhabricatorSearchTokenizerField' => 'PhabricatorSearchField',
'PhabricatorSearchWorker' => 'PhabricatorWorker',
'PhabricatorSecurityConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorSecuritySetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
Implement a basic version of ApplicationEditor in Paste Summary: Ref T9132. Ref T4768. This is a rough v0 of ApplicationEditor, which replaces the edit workflow in Paste. This mostly looks and works like ApplicationSearch, and is heavily modeled on it. Roughly, we define a set of editable fields and the ApplicationEditor stuff builds everything else. This has no functional changes, except: - I removed "Fork Paste" since I don't think it's particularly useful now that pastes are editable. We could restore it if users miss it. - Subscribers are now editable. - Form field order is a little goofy (this will be fixed in a future diff). - Subscribers and projects are now race-resistant. The race-resistance works like this: instead of submitting just the new value ("subscribers=apple, dog") and doing a set operation ("set subscribers = apple, dog"), we submit the old and new values ("original=apple" + "new=apple, dog") then apply the user's changes as an add + remove ("add=dog", "remove=<none>"). This means that two users who do "Edit Paste" at around the same time and each add or remove a couple of subscribers won't overwrite each other, unless they actually add or remove the exact same subscribers (in which case their edits legitimately conflict). Previously, the last user to save would win, and whatever was in their field would overwrite the prior state, potentially losing the first user's edits. Test Plan: - Created pastes. - Created pastes via API. - Edited pastes. - Edited every field. - Opened a paste in two windows and did project/subscriber edits in each, saved in arbitrary order, had edits respected. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14390
2015-11-03 03:58:32 +01:00
'PhabricatorSelectEditField' => 'PhabricatorEditField',
'PhabricatorSendGridConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorSessionsSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
Add semi-generic rate limiting infrastructure Summary: This adds a system which basically keeps a record of recent actions, who took them, and how many "points" they were worth, like: epriestley email.add 1 1233989813 epriestley email.add 1 1234298239 epriestley email.add 1 1238293981 We can use this to rate-limit actions by examining how many actions the user has taken in the past hour (i.e., their total score) and comparing that to an allowed limit. One major thing I want to use this for is to limit the amount of error email we'll send to an email address. A big concern I have with sending more error email is that we'll end up in loops. We have some protections against this in headers already, but hard-limiting the system so it won't send more than a few errors to a particular address per hour should provide a reasonable secondary layer of protection. This use case (where the "actor" needs to be an email address) is why the table uses strings + hashes instead of PHIDs. For external users, it might be appropriate to rate limit by cookies or IPs, too. To prove it works, I rate limited adding email addresses. This is a very, very low-risk security thing where a user with an account can enumerate addresses (by checking if they get an error) and sort of spam/annoy people (by adding their address over and over again). Limiting them to 6 actions / hour should satisfy all real users while preventing these behaviors. Test Plan: This dialog is uggos but I'll fix that in a sec: {F137406} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8683
2014-04-03 20:22:38 +02:00
'PhabricatorSettingsAddEmailAction' => 'PhabricatorSystemAction',
'PhabricatorSettingsAdjustController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorSettingsApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorSettingsMainController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorSettingsPanel' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSetupCheck' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSetupCheckTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorSetupIssue' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSetupIssueUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PhabricatorSetupIssueView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorShortSite' => 'PhabricatorSite',
'PhabricatorSimpleEditType' => 'PhabricatorEditType',
'PhabricatorSite' => 'AphrontSite',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteChoice' => 'PhabricatorSlowvoteDAO',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteCloseController' => 'PhabricatorSlowvoteController',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteCommentController' => 'PhabricatorSlowvoteController',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteDefaultViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteEditController' => 'PhabricatorSlowvoteController',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteListController' => 'PhabricatorSlowvoteController',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteOption' => 'PhabricatorSlowvoteDAO',
'PhabricatorSlowvotePoll' => array(
'PhabricatorSlowvoteDAO',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorSpacesInterface',
),
'PhabricatorSlowvotePollController' => 'PhabricatorSlowvoteController',
'PhabricatorSlowvotePollPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorSlowvoteVoteController' => 'PhabricatorSlowvoteController',
'PhabricatorSlug' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSlugTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorSortTableUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PhabricatorSourceCodeView' => 'AphrontView',
Implement a basic version of ApplicationEditor in Paste Summary: Ref T9132. Ref T4768. This is a rough v0 of ApplicationEditor, which replaces the edit workflow in Paste. This mostly looks and works like ApplicationSearch, and is heavily modeled on it. Roughly, we define a set of editable fields and the ApplicationEditor stuff builds everything else. This has no functional changes, except: - I removed "Fork Paste" since I don't think it's particularly useful now that pastes are editable. We could restore it if users miss it. - Subscribers are now editable. - Form field order is a little goofy (this will be fixed in a future diff). - Subscribers and projects are now race-resistant. The race-resistance works like this: instead of submitting just the new value ("subscribers=apple, dog") and doing a set operation ("set subscribers = apple, dog"), we submit the old and new values ("original=apple" + "new=apple, dog") then apply the user's changes as an add + remove ("add=dog", "remove=<none>"). This means that two users who do "Edit Paste" at around the same time and each add or remove a couple of subscribers won't overwrite each other, unless they actually add or remove the exact same subscribers (in which case their edits legitimately conflict). Previously, the last user to save would win, and whatever was in their field would overwrite the prior state, potentially losing the first user's edits. Test Plan: - Created pastes. - Created pastes via API. - Edited pastes. - Edited every field. - Opened a paste in two windows and did project/subscriber edits in each, saved in arbitrary order, had edits respected. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14390
2015-11-03 03:58:32 +01:00
'PhabricatorSpaceEditField' => 'PhabricatorEditField',
'PhabricatorSpacesApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorSpacesArchiveController' => 'PhabricatorSpacesController',
'PhabricatorSpacesCapabilityCreateSpaces' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PhabricatorSpacesCapabilityDefaultEdit' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PhabricatorSpacesCapabilityDefaultView' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PhabricatorSpacesController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorSpacesDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorSpacesEditController' => 'PhabricatorSpacesController',
'PhabricatorSpacesInterface' => 'PhabricatorPHIDInterface',
'PhabricatorSpacesListController' => 'PhabricatorSpacesController',
'PhabricatorSpacesNamespace' => array(
'PhabricatorSpacesDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorSpacesNamespacePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorSpacesNamespaceTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorSpacesNoAccessController' => 'PhabricatorSpacesController',
'PhabricatorSpacesRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'PhabricatorSpacesSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhabricatorSpacesSearchEngineExtension' => 'PhabricatorSearchEngineExtension',
'PhabricatorSpacesSearchField' => 'PhabricatorSearchTokenizerField',
'PhabricatorSpacesTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorSpacesViewController' => 'PhabricatorSpacesController',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomField' => 'PhabricatorCustomField',
Rough cut of "Blueprint Authorizations" Summary: Ref T9519. This is like 80% of the way there and doesn't fully work yet, but roughly shows the shape of things to come. Here's how it works: First, there's a new custom field type for blueprints which works like a normal typeahead but has some extra logic. It's implemented this way to make it easy to add to Blueprints in Drydock and Build Plans in Harbormaster. Here, I've added a "Use Blueprints" field to the "WorkingCopy" blueprint, so you can control which hosts the working copies are permitted to allocate on: {F869865} This control has a bit of custom rendering logic. Instead of rendering a normal list of PHIDs, it renders an annotated list with icons: {F869866} These icons show whether the blueprint on the other size of the authorization has approved this object. Once you have a green checkmark, you're good to go. On the blueprint side, things look like this: {F869867} This table shows all the objects which have asked for access to this blueprint. In this case it's showing that one object is approved to use the blueprint since I already approved it, but by default new requests come in here as "Authorization Requested" and someone has to go approve them. You approve them from within the authorization detail screen: {F869868} You can use the "Approve" or "Decline" buttons to allow or prevent use of the blueprint. This doesn't actually do anything yet -- objects don't need to be authorized in order to use blueprints quite yet. That will come in the next diff, I just wanted to get the UI in reasonable shape first. The authorization also has a second piece of state, which is whether the request from the object is active or inactive. We use this to keep track of the authorization if the blueprint is (maybe temporarily) deleted. For example, you might have a Build Plan that uses Blueprints A and B. For a couple days, you only want to use A, so you remove B from the "Use Blueprints: ..." field. Later, you can add B back and it will connect to its old authorization again, so you don't need to go re-approve things (and if you're declined, you stay declined instead of being able to request authorization over and over again). This should make working with authorizations a little easier and less labor intensive. Stuff not in this diff: - Actually preventing any allocations (next diff). - Probably should have transactions for approve/decline, at least, at some point, so there's a log of who did approvals and when. - Maybe should have a more clear/loud error state when no blueprints are approved? - Should probably restrict the typeahead to specific blueprint types. Test Plan: - Added the field. - Typed some stuff into it. - Saw the UI update properly. - Approved an authorization. - Declined an authorization. - Saw active authorizations on a blueprint page. - Didn't see any inactive authroizations there. - Clicked "View All Authorizations", saw all authorizations. Reviewers: chad, hach-que Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9519 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14251
2015-10-10 16:15:25 +02:00
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldBlueprints' => 'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldTokenizer',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldBool' => 'PhabricatorStandardCustomField',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldCredential' => 'PhabricatorStandardCustomField',
Provide a generic "Datasource" StandardCustomField Summary: Ref T9253. See discussion in D13843. I want to let Drydock blueprints for Almanac services choose those services from a typeahead, but only list appropriate services in the typeahead. To do this: - Provide a StandardCustomField for an arbitrary datasource. - Adjust the AlmanacServiceDatasource to allow filtering by service class. This implementation is substantially the same as the one in D13843, with some adjustments: - I lifted most of the code in the `Users` standard custom field into a new `Tokenizer` standard custom field. - The `Users` and `Datasource` custom fields now extend the `Tokenizer` custom field and can share most of the code it uses. - I exposed this field fully as a configurable field. I don't think anyone will ever use it, but this generality costs us nearly nothing and improves consistency. - The code in D13843 didn't actually pass the parameters over the wire, since the object that responds to the request is not the same object that renders the field. Use the "parameters" mechanism in datasources to get things passed over the wire. Test Plan: - Created a custom "users" field in Maniphest and made sure it still wokred. - Created a custom "almanc services" field in Maniphest and selected some services for a task. - With additional changes from D13843, selected an appropriate Almanac service in a new Drydock blueprint. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: hach-que, chad Maniphest Tasks: T9253 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14111
2015-09-21 13:41:52 +02:00
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldDatasource' => 'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldTokenizer',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldDate' => 'PhabricatorStandardCustomField',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldHeader' => 'PhabricatorStandardCustomField',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldInt' => 'PhabricatorStandardCustomField',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldLink' => 'PhabricatorStandardCustomField',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldPHIDs' => 'PhabricatorStandardCustomField',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldRemarkup' => 'PhabricatorStandardCustomField',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldSelect' => 'PhabricatorStandardCustomField',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldText' => 'PhabricatorStandardCustomField',
Provide a generic "Datasource" StandardCustomField Summary: Ref T9253. See discussion in D13843. I want to let Drydock blueprints for Almanac services choose those services from a typeahead, but only list appropriate services in the typeahead. To do this: - Provide a StandardCustomField for an arbitrary datasource. - Adjust the AlmanacServiceDatasource to allow filtering by service class. This implementation is substantially the same as the one in D13843, with some adjustments: - I lifted most of the code in the `Users` standard custom field into a new `Tokenizer` standard custom field. - The `Users` and `Datasource` custom fields now extend the `Tokenizer` custom field and can share most of the code it uses. - I exposed this field fully as a configurable field. I don't think anyone will ever use it, but this generality costs us nearly nothing and improves consistency. - The code in D13843 didn't actually pass the parameters over the wire, since the object that responds to the request is not the same object that renders the field. Use the "parameters" mechanism in datasources to get things passed over the wire. Test Plan: - Created a custom "users" field in Maniphest and made sure it still wokred. - Created a custom "almanc services" field in Maniphest and selected some services for a task. - With additional changes from D13843, selected an appropriate Almanac service in a new Drydock blueprint. Reviewers: hach-que, chad Reviewed By: hach-que, chad Maniphest Tasks: T9253 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14111
2015-09-21 13:41:52 +02:00
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldTokenizer' => 'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldPHIDs',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldUsers' => 'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldTokenizer',
Make mobile navigation work properly by default in more cases Summary: Fixes T5752. This obsoletes a bunch of old patterns and I'll follow up on those with a big "go do a bunch of mechanical code changes" task. Major goals are: - Don't load named queries multiple times on search pages. - Don't require extra code to get standard navigation right on mobile. - Reduce the amount of boilerplate in ListControllers. - Reduce the amount of boilerplate around navigation/menus in all controllers. Specifically, here's what this does: - The StandardPage is now a smarter/more structured object with `setNavigation()` and `setCrumbs()` methods. More rendering decisions are delayed until the last possible moment. - It uses this to automatically add crumb actions to the application menu. - It uses this to automatically reuse one SearchEngine instead of running queries multiple times. - The new preferred way to build responses is `$this->newPage()` (like `$this->newDialog()`), which has structured methods for adding stuff (`setTitle()`, etc). - SearchEngine exposes a new convenience method so you don't have to do all the controller delegation stuff. - Building menus is generally simpler. Test Plan: - Tested paste list, view, edit, comment, raw controllers for functionality, mobile menu, crumbs, navigation menu. - Edited saved queries. - Tested Differential, Maniphest (no changes). - Verified the paste pages don't run any duplicate NamedQuery queries. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T5752 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14382
2015-11-02 21:06:28 +01:00
'PhabricatorStandardPageView' => array(
'PhabricatorBarePageView',
'AphrontResponseProducerInterface',
),
'PhabricatorStandardSelectCustomFieldDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
2011-04-08 20:13:29 +02:00
'PhabricatorStatusController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorStatusUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PhabricatorStorageFixtureScopeGuard' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementAPI' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementAdjustWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorStorageManagementWorkflow',
Make SQL patch management DAG-based and provide namespace support Summary: This addresses three issues with the current patch management system: # Two people developing at the same time often pick the same SQL patch number, and then have to go rename it. The system catches this, but it's silly. # Second/third-party developers can't use the same system to manage auxiliary storage they may want to add. # There's no way to build mock databases for unit tests that need to do reads. To resolve these things, you can now name your patches whatever you want and conflicts are just merge conflicts, which are less of a pain to fix than filename conflicts. Dependencies are now a DAG, with implicit dependencies created on the prior patch if no dependencies are specified. Developers can add new concrete subclasses of `PhabricatorSQLPatchList` to add storage management, and define the dependency branchpoint of their patches so they apply in the correct order (although, generally, they should not depend on the mainline patches, presumably). The commands `storage upgrade --namespace test1234` and `storage destroy --namespace test1234` will allow unit tests to build and destroy MySQL storage. A "quickstart" mode allows an upgrade from scratch in ~1200ms. Destruction takes about 200ms. These seem like fairily reasonable costs to actually use in tests. Building from scratch patch-by-patch takes about 6000ms. Test Plan: - Created new databases from scratch with and without quickstart in a separate test namespace. Pointed the webapp at the test namespaces, browsed around, everything looked good. - Compared quickstart and no-quickstart dump states, they're identical except for mysqldump timestamps and a few similar things. - Upgraded a legacy database to the new storage format. - Destroyed / dumped storage. Reviewers: edward, vrana, btrahan, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, nh Maniphest Tasks: T140, T345 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2323
2012-04-30 16:54:00 +02:00
'PhabricatorStorageManagementDatabasesWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorStorageManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementDestroyWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorStorageManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementDumpWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorStorageManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementProbeWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorStorageManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementQuickstartWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorStorageManagementWorkflow',
Add a `storage renamespace` for mangling SQL dumpfiles into a new namespace Summary: Ref T7149. When users give us dumpfiles for import, they will almost inevitably use the `phabricator` namespace. They need to be renamed to use an instance namespace. We can do this either by: - importing the data first, then renaming; or - renaming first, then importing. This implements the second one, basically `storage renamespace --in dump.sql --from phabricator --to instancename > instance.sql`. Renaming first is a little hackier since we have to `preg_match()` a SQL dump file, but I think it's better overall: - With only one database, it lets you dump/import without downtime. - If you have development stuff in a development environment in the `phabricator` namespace, you don't have to move it aside to do an import. - No possibility that two people doing an import at the same time on the same box will collide with each other. - You can do the rename once and then repeat the import process with the renamed dump more easily. - No tricky stuff with modern Phabricator running against an old dump and the database names not matching up. None of this is super important, but it just makes large dumps a bit easier to work with, and the dumpfile format is regular enough that this seems unlikely to ever really not work. Test Plan: Renamespaced a dump, did a `diff -u`, saw all the relevant parts changed (and only those parts changed). Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7149 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12105
2015-03-18 02:29:01 +01:00
'PhabricatorStorageManagementRenamespaceWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorStorageManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementShellWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorStorageManagementWorkflow',
Make SQL patch management DAG-based and provide namespace support Summary: This addresses three issues with the current patch management system: # Two people developing at the same time often pick the same SQL patch number, and then have to go rename it. The system catches this, but it's silly. # Second/third-party developers can't use the same system to manage auxiliary storage they may want to add. # There's no way to build mock databases for unit tests that need to do reads. To resolve these things, you can now name your patches whatever you want and conflicts are just merge conflicts, which are less of a pain to fix than filename conflicts. Dependencies are now a DAG, with implicit dependencies created on the prior patch if no dependencies are specified. Developers can add new concrete subclasses of `PhabricatorSQLPatchList` to add storage management, and define the dependency branchpoint of their patches so they apply in the correct order (although, generally, they should not depend on the mainline patches, presumably). The commands `storage upgrade --namespace test1234` and `storage destroy --namespace test1234` will allow unit tests to build and destroy MySQL storage. A "quickstart" mode allows an upgrade from scratch in ~1200ms. Destruction takes about 200ms. These seem like fairily reasonable costs to actually use in tests. Building from scratch patch-by-patch takes about 6000ms. Test Plan: - Created new databases from scratch with and without quickstart in a separate test namespace. Pointed the webapp at the test namespaces, browsed around, everything looked good. - Compared quickstart and no-quickstart dump states, they're identical except for mysqldump timestamps and a few similar things. - Upgraded a legacy database to the new storage format. - Destroyed / dumped storage. Reviewers: edward, vrana, btrahan, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, nh Maniphest Tasks: T140, T345 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2323
2012-04-30 16:54:00 +02:00
'PhabricatorStorageManagementStatusWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorStorageManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementUpgradeWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorStorageManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorStorageManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorStoragePatch' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorStorageSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhabricatorStorageSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorStreamingProtocolAdapter' => 'PhabricatorProtocolAdapter',
'PhabricatorSubscribedToObjectEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorSubscribersEditField' => 'PhabricatorTokenizerEditField',
'PhabricatorSubscribersQuery' => 'PhabricatorQuery',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionTriggerClock' => 'PhabricatorTriggerClock',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsAddSelfHeraldAction' => 'PhabricatorSubscriptionsHeraldAction',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsAddSubscribersHeraldAction' => 'PhabricatorSubscriptionsHeraldAction',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsEditController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsEditEngineExtension' => 'PhabricatorEditEngineExtension',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsEditor' => 'PhabricatorEditor',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsHeraldAction' => 'HeraldAction',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsListController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsRemoveSelfHeraldAction' => 'PhabricatorSubscriptionsHeraldAction',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsRemoveSubscribersHeraldAction' => 'PhabricatorSubscriptionsHeraldAction',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsSearchEngineExtension' => 'PhabricatorSearchEngineExtension',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsSubscribeEmailCommand' => 'MetaMTAEmailTransactionCommand',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsSubscribersPolicyRule' => 'PhabricatorPolicyRule',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsTransactionController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsUIEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
'PhabricatorSubscriptionsUnsubscribeEmailCommand' => 'MetaMTAEmailTransactionCommand',
'PhabricatorSupportApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorSyntaxHighlighter' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSyntaxHighlightingConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorSystemAction' => 'Phobject',
Add semi-generic rate limiting infrastructure Summary: This adds a system which basically keeps a record of recent actions, who took them, and how many "points" they were worth, like: epriestley email.add 1 1233989813 epriestley email.add 1 1234298239 epriestley email.add 1 1238293981 We can use this to rate-limit actions by examining how many actions the user has taken in the past hour (i.e., their total score) and comparing that to an allowed limit. One major thing I want to use this for is to limit the amount of error email we'll send to an email address. A big concern I have with sending more error email is that we'll end up in loops. We have some protections against this in headers already, but hard-limiting the system so it won't send more than a few errors to a particular address per hour should provide a reasonable secondary layer of protection. This use case (where the "actor" needs to be an email address) is why the table uses strings + hashes instead of PHIDs. For external users, it might be appropriate to rate limit by cookies or IPs, too. To prove it works, I rate limited adding email addresses. This is a very, very low-risk security thing where a user with an account can enumerate addresses (by checking if they get an error) and sort of spam/annoy people (by adding their address over and over again). Limiting them to 6 actions / hour should satisfy all real users while preventing these behaviors. Test Plan: This dialog is uggos but I'll fix that in a sec: {F137406} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8683
2014-04-03 20:22:38 +02:00
'PhabricatorSystemActionEngine' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorSystemActionGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'PhabricatorSystemActionLog' => 'PhabricatorSystemDAO',
'PhabricatorSystemActionRateLimitException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorSystemApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
Add semi-generic rate limiting infrastructure Summary: This adds a system which basically keeps a record of recent actions, who took them, and how many "points" they were worth, like: epriestley email.add 1 1233989813 epriestley email.add 1 1234298239 epriestley email.add 1 1238293981 We can use this to rate-limit actions by examining how many actions the user has taken in the past hour (i.e., their total score) and comparing that to an allowed limit. One major thing I want to use this for is to limit the amount of error email we'll send to an email address. A big concern I have with sending more error email is that we'll end up in loops. We have some protections against this in headers already, but hard-limiting the system so it won't send more than a few errors to a particular address per hour should provide a reasonable secondary layer of protection. This use case (where the "actor" needs to be an email address) is why the table uses strings + hashes instead of PHIDs. For external users, it might be appropriate to rate limit by cookies or IPs, too. To prove it works, I rate limited adding email addresses. This is a very, very low-risk security thing where a user with an account can enumerate addresses (by checking if they get an error) and sort of spam/annoy people (by adding their address over and over again). Limiting them to 6 actions / hour should satisfy all real users while preventing these behaviors. Test Plan: This dialog is uggos but I'll fix that in a sec: {F137406} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8683
2014-04-03 20:22:38 +02:00
'PhabricatorSystemDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorSystemDestructionGarbageCollector' => 'PhabricatorGarbageCollector',
'PhabricatorSystemDestructionLog' => 'PhabricatorSystemDAO',
'PhabricatorSystemRemoveDestroyWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorSystemRemoveWorkflow',
'PhabricatorSystemRemoveLogWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorSystemRemoveWorkflow',
'PhabricatorSystemRemoveWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorSystemSelectEncodingController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorSystemSelectHighlightController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorTOTPAuthFactor' => 'PhabricatorAuthFactor',
'PhabricatorTOTPAuthFactorTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorTaskmasterDaemon' => 'PhabricatorDaemon',
'PhabricatorTestApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorTestCase' => 'PhutilTestCase',
'PhabricatorTestController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorTestDataGenerator' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorTestNoCycleEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorTestStorageEngine' => 'PhabricatorFileStorageEngine',
'PhabricatorTestWorker' => 'PhabricatorWorker',
Implement a basic version of ApplicationEditor in Paste Summary: Ref T9132. Ref T4768. This is a rough v0 of ApplicationEditor, which replaces the edit workflow in Paste. This mostly looks and works like ApplicationSearch, and is heavily modeled on it. Roughly, we define a set of editable fields and the ApplicationEditor stuff builds everything else. This has no functional changes, except: - I removed "Fork Paste" since I don't think it's particularly useful now that pastes are editable. We could restore it if users miss it. - Subscribers are now editable. - Form field order is a little goofy (this will be fixed in a future diff). - Subscribers and projects are now race-resistant. The race-resistance works like this: instead of submitting just the new value ("subscribers=apple, dog") and doing a set operation ("set subscribers = apple, dog"), we submit the old and new values ("original=apple" + "new=apple, dog") then apply the user's changes as an add + remove ("add=dog", "remove=<none>"). This means that two users who do "Edit Paste" at around the same time and each add or remove a couple of subscribers won't overwrite each other, unless they actually add or remove the exact same subscribers (in which case their edits legitimately conflict). Previously, the last user to save would win, and whatever was in their field would overwrite the prior state, potentially losing the first user's edits. Test Plan: - Created pastes. - Created pastes via API. - Edited pastes. - Edited every field. - Opened a paste in two windows and did project/subscriber edits in each, saved in arbitrary order, had edits respected. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T9132 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14390
2015-11-03 03:58:32 +01:00
'PhabricatorTextAreaEditField' => 'PhabricatorEditField',
'PhabricatorTextEditField' => 'PhabricatorEditField',
'PhabricatorTime' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorTimeGuard' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorTimeTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorTimezoneSetupCheck' => 'PhabricatorSetupCheck',
'PhabricatorToken' => array(
'PhabricatorTokenDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorTokenController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorTokenCount' => 'PhabricatorTokenDAO',
'PhabricatorTokenCountQuery' => 'PhabricatorOffsetPagedQuery',
'PhabricatorTokenDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorTokenGiveController' => 'PhabricatorTokenController',
'PhabricatorTokenGiven' => array(
'PhabricatorTokenDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorTokenGivenController' => 'PhabricatorTokenController',
'PhabricatorTokenGivenEditor' => 'PhabricatorEditor',
'PhabricatorTokenGivenFeedStory' => 'PhabricatorFeedStory',
'PhabricatorTokenGivenQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorTokenLeaderController' => 'PhabricatorTokenController',
'PhabricatorTokenQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorTokenTokenPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorTokenUIEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
'PhabricatorTokenizerEditField' => 'PhabricatorPHIDListEditField',
'PhabricatorTokensApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorTokensSettingsPanel' => 'PhabricatorSettingsPanel',
'PhabricatorTooltipUIExample' => 'PhabricatorUIExample',
'PhabricatorTransactions' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorTransactionsApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorTransformedFile' => 'PhabricatorFileDAO',
'PhabricatorTranslationsConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
Implement clock/trigger infrastructure for scheduling actions Summary: Ref T6881. Hopefully, this is the hard part. This adds a new daemon (the "trigger" daemon) which processes triggers, schedules them, and then executes them at the scheduled time. The design is a little complicated, but has these goals: - High resistance to race conditions: only the application writes to the trigger table; only the daemon writes to the event table. We won't lose events if someone saves a meeting at the same time as we're sending a reminder out for it. - Execution guarantees: scheduled events are guaranteed to execute exactly once. - Support for arbitrarily large queues: the daemon will make progress even if there are millions of triggers in queue. The cost to update the queue is proportional to the number of changes in it; the cost to process the queue is proportional to the number of events to execute. - Relatively good observability: you can monitor the state of the trigger queue reasonably well from the web UI. - Modular Infrastructure: this is a very low-level construct that Calendar, Phortune, etc., should be able to build on top of. It doesn't have this stuff yet: - Not very robust to bad actions: a misbehaving trigger can stop the queue fairly easily. This is OK for now since we aren't planning to make it part of any other applications for a while. We do still get execute-exaclty-once, but it might not happen for a long time (until someone goes and fixes the queue), when we could theoretically continue executing other events. - Doesn't start automatically: normal users don't need to run this thing yet so I'm not starting it by default. - Not super well tested: I've vetted the basics but haven't run real workloads through this yet. - No sophisticated tooling: I added some basic stuff but it's missing some pieces we'll have to build sooner or later, e.g. `bin/trigger cancel` or whatever. - Intentionally not realtime: This design puts execution guarantees far above realtime concerns, and will not give you precise event execution at 1-second resolution. I think this is the correct goal to pursue architecturally, and certainly correct for subscriptions and meeting reminders. Events which execute after they have become irrelevant can simply decline to do anything (like a meeting reminder which executes after the meeting is over). In general, the expectation for applications is: - When creating an object (like a calendar event) that needs to trigger a scheduled action, write a trigger (and save the PHID if you plan to update it later). - The daemon will process the event and schedule the action efficiently, in a race-free way. - If you want to move the action, update the trigger and the daemon will take care of it. - Your action will eventually dump a task into the task queue, and the task daemons will actually perform it. Test Plan: Using a test script like this: ``` <?php require_once 'scripts/__init_script__.php'; $trigger = id(new PhabricatorWorkerTrigger()) ->setAction( new PhabricatorLogTriggerAction( array( 'message' => 'test', ))) ->setClock( new PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock( array( 'period' => 33, ))) ->save(); var_dump($trigger); ``` ...I queued triggers and ran the daemon: - Verified triggers fire; - verified triggers reschedule; - verified trigger events show up in the web UI; - tried different periods; - added some triggers while the daemon was running; - examined `phd debug` output for anything suspicious. It seems to work in trivial use case, at least. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T6881 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11419
2015-01-16 21:13:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorTriggerAction' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorTriggerClock' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorTriggerClockTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
Implement clock/trigger infrastructure for scheduling actions Summary: Ref T6881. Hopefully, this is the hard part. This adds a new daemon (the "trigger" daemon) which processes triggers, schedules them, and then executes them at the scheduled time. The design is a little complicated, but has these goals: - High resistance to race conditions: only the application writes to the trigger table; only the daemon writes to the event table. We won't lose events if someone saves a meeting at the same time as we're sending a reminder out for it. - Execution guarantees: scheduled events are guaranteed to execute exactly once. - Support for arbitrarily large queues: the daemon will make progress even if there are millions of triggers in queue. The cost to update the queue is proportional to the number of changes in it; the cost to process the queue is proportional to the number of events to execute. - Relatively good observability: you can monitor the state of the trigger queue reasonably well from the web UI. - Modular Infrastructure: this is a very low-level construct that Calendar, Phortune, etc., should be able to build on top of. It doesn't have this stuff yet: - Not very robust to bad actions: a misbehaving trigger can stop the queue fairly easily. This is OK for now since we aren't planning to make it part of any other applications for a while. We do still get execute-exaclty-once, but it might not happen for a long time (until someone goes and fixes the queue), when we could theoretically continue executing other events. - Doesn't start automatically: normal users don't need to run this thing yet so I'm not starting it by default. - Not super well tested: I've vetted the basics but haven't run real workloads through this yet. - No sophisticated tooling: I added some basic stuff but it's missing some pieces we'll have to build sooner or later, e.g. `bin/trigger cancel` or whatever. - Intentionally not realtime: This design puts execution guarantees far above realtime concerns, and will not give you precise event execution at 1-second resolution. I think this is the correct goal to pursue architecturally, and certainly correct for subscriptions and meeting reminders. Events which execute after they have become irrelevant can simply decline to do anything (like a meeting reminder which executes after the meeting is over). In general, the expectation for applications is: - When creating an object (like a calendar event) that needs to trigger a scheduled action, write a trigger (and save the PHID if you plan to update it later). - The daemon will process the event and schedule the action efficiently, in a race-free way. - If you want to move the action, update the trigger and the daemon will take care of it. - Your action will eventually dump a task into the task queue, and the task daemons will actually perform it. Test Plan: Using a test script like this: ``` <?php require_once 'scripts/__init_script__.php'; $trigger = id(new PhabricatorWorkerTrigger()) ->setAction( new PhabricatorLogTriggerAction( array( 'message' => 'test', ))) ->setClock( new PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock( array( 'period' => 33, ))) ->save(); var_dump($trigger); ``` ...I queued triggers and ran the daemon: - Verified triggers fire; - verified triggers reschedule; - verified trigger events show up in the web UI; - tried different periods; - added some triggers while the daemon was running; - examined `phd debug` output for anything suspicious. It seems to work in trivial use case, at least. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T6881 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11419
2015-01-16 21:13:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorTriggerDaemon' => 'PhabricatorDaemon',
'PhabricatorTrivialTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorTwitchAuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorOAuth2AuthProvider',
'PhabricatorTwitterAuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorOAuth1AuthProvider',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource' => 'Phobject',
2011-01-25 22:48:05 +01:00
'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasourceController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadFunctionHelpController' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasourceController',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadInvalidTokenException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadModularDatasourceController' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasourceController',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadMonogramDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadResult' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadRuntimeCompositeDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadCompositeDatasource',
'PhabricatorTypeaheadTokenView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PhabricatorUIConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorUIExample' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorUIExampleRenderController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorUIExamplesApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
'PhabricatorUSEnglishTranslation' => 'PhutilTranslation',
'PhabricatorUnitsTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorUnsubscribedFromObjectEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorUser' => array(
'PhabricatorUserDAO',
'PhutilPerson',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorSSHPublicKeyInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
),
'PhabricatorUserBlurbField' => 'PhabricatorUserCustomField',
'PhabricatorUserConfigOptions' => 'PhabricatorApplicationConfigOptions',
'PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomField' => array(
'PhabricatorUserCustomField',
'PhabricatorStandardCustomFieldInterface',
),
Support configuration-driven custom fields Summary: Ref T1702. Ref T3718. There are a couple of things going on here: **PhabricatorCustomFieldList**: I added `PhabricatorCustomFieldList`, which is just a convenience class for dealing with lists of fields. Often, current field code does something like this inline in a Controller: foreach ($fields as $field) { // do some junk } Often, that junk has some slightly subtle implications. Move all of it to `$list->doSomeJunk()` methods (like `appendFieldsToForm()`, `loadFieldsFromStorage()`) to reduce code duplication and prevent errors. This additionally moves an existing list-convenience method there, out of `PhabricatorPropertyListView`. **PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage**: Adds `PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage` for storing custom field data (like "ICQ Handle", "Phone Number", "Desk", "Favorite Flower", etc). **Configuration-Driven Custom Fields**: Previously, I was thinking about doing these with interfaces, but as I thought about it more I started to dislike that approach. Instead, I built proxies into `PhabricatorCustomField`. Basically, this means that fields (like a custom, configuration-driven "Favorite Flower" field) can just use some other Field to actually provide their implementation (like a "standard" field which knows how to render text areas). The previous approach would have involed subclasssing the "standard" field and implementing an interface, but that would mean that every application would have at least two "base" fields and generally just seemed bleh as I worked through it. The cost of this approach is that we need a bunch of `proxy` junk in the base class, but that's a one-time cost and I think it simplifies all the implementations and makes them a lot less magical (e.g., all of the custom fields now extend the right base field classes). **Fixed Some Bugs**: Some of this code hadn't really been run yet and had minor bugs. Test Plan: {F54240} {F54241} {F54242} Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1702, T1703, T3718 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6749
2013-08-14 17:10:16 +02:00
'PhabricatorUserConfiguredCustomFieldStorage' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldStorage',
'PhabricatorUserCustomField' => 'PhabricatorCustomField',
Integrate ApplicationSearch with CustomField Summary: Ref T2625. Ref T3794. Ref T418. Ref T1703. This is a more general version of D5278. It expands CustomField support to include real integration with ApplicationSearch. Broadly, custom fields may elect to: - build indicies when objects are updated; - populate ApplicationSearch forms with new controls; - read inputs entered into those controls out of the request; and - apply constraints to search queries. Some utility/helper stuff is provided to make this easier. This part could be cleaner, but seems reasonable for a first cut. In particular, the Query and SearchEngine must manually call all the hooks right now instead of everything happening magically. I think that's fine for the moment; they're pretty easy to get right. Test Plan: I added a new searchable "Company" field to People: {F58229} This also cleaned up the disable/reorder view a little bit: {F58230} As it did before, this field appears on the edit screen: {F58231} However, because it has `search`, it also appears on the search screen: {F58232} When queried, it returns the expected results: {F58233} And the actually good bit of all this is that the query can take advantage of indexes: mysql> explain SELECT * FROM `user` user JOIN `user_customfieldstringindex` `appsearch_0` ON `appsearch_0`.objectPHID = user.phid AND `appsearch_0`.indexKey = 'mk3Ndy476ge6' AND `appsearch_0`.indexValue IN ('phacility') ORDER BY user.id DESC LIMIT 101; +----+-------------+-------------+--------+-------------------+----------+---------+------------------------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | +----+-------------+-------------+--------+-------------------+----------+---------+------------------------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+ | 1 | SIMPLE | appsearch_0 | ref | key_join,key_find | key_find | 232 | const,const | 1 | Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort | | 1 | SIMPLE | user | eq_ref | phid | phid | 194 | phabricator2_user.appsearch_0.objectPHID | 1 | | +----+-------------+-------------+--------+-------------------+----------+---------+------------------------------------------+------+----------------------------------------------+ 2 rows in set (0.00 sec) Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T418, T1703, T2625, T3794 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6992
2013-09-16 22:44:34 +02:00
'PhabricatorUserCustomFieldNumericIndex' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldNumericIndexStorage',
'PhabricatorUserCustomFieldStringIndex' => 'PhabricatorCustomFieldStringIndexStorage',
2011-01-24 03:09:16 +01:00
'PhabricatorUserDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorUserEditor' => 'PhabricatorEditor',
'PhabricatorUserEditorTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
Allow users to have multiple email addresses, and verify emails Summary: - Move email to a separate table. - Migrate existing email to new storage. - Allow users to add and remove email addresses. - Allow users to verify email addresses. - Allow users to change their primary email address. - Convert all the registration/reset/login code to understand these changes. - There are a few security considerations here but I think I've addressed them. Principally, it is important to never let a user acquire a verified email address they don't actually own. We ensure this by tightening the scoping of token generation rules to be (user, email) specific. - This should have essentially zero impact on Facebook, but may require some minor changes in the registration code -- I don't exactly remember how it is set up. Not included here (next steps): - Allow configuration to restrict email to certain domains. - Allow configuration to require validated email. Test Plan: This is a fairly extensive, difficult-to-test change. - From "Email Addresses" interface: - Added new email (verified email verifications sent). - Changed primary email (verified old/new notificactions sent). - Resent verification emails (verified they sent). - Removed email. - Tried to add already-owned email. - Created new users with "accountadmin". Edited existing users with "accountadmin". - Created new users with "add_user.php". - Created new users with web interface. - Clicked welcome email link, verified it verified email. - Reset password. - Linked/unlinked oauth accounts. - Logged in with oauth account. - Logged in with email. - Registered with Oauth account. - Tried to register with OAuth account with duplicate email. - Verified errors for email verification with bad tokens, etc. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1184 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2393
2012-05-07 19:29:33 +02:00
'PhabricatorUserEmail' => 'PhabricatorUserDAO',
'PhabricatorUserEmailTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorUserLog' => array(
'PhabricatorUserDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhabricatorUserLogView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorUserPHIDResolver' => 'PhabricatorPHIDResolver',
'PhabricatorUserPreferences' => 'PhabricatorUserDAO',
'PhabricatorUserProfile' => 'PhabricatorUserDAO',
'PhabricatorUserProfileEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorUserRealNameField' => 'PhabricatorUserCustomField',
'PhabricatorUserRolesField' => 'PhabricatorUserCustomField',
'PhabricatorUserSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
Improve Search architecture Summary: The search indexing API has several problems right now: - Always runs in-process. - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it. - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster. - Instead, make the API phid-oriented. - No uniform indexing API. - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird. - Instead, provide a uniform API. - No uniform CLI. - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers. - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing. - Not application-oriented. - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world. - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader. Test Plan: - `bin/search index` - Indexed one revision, one task. - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types. - Indexed `--all`. - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it. - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing. - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing. - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: 20after4, aran Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 23:21:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorUserSearchIndexer' => 'PhabricatorSearchDocumentIndexer',
'PhabricatorUserSinceField' => 'PhabricatorUserCustomField',
'PhabricatorUserStatusField' => 'PhabricatorUserCustomField',
'PhabricatorUserTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorUserTitleField' => 'PhabricatorUserCustomField',
'PhabricatorUserTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorUsersEditField' => 'PhabricatorTokenizerEditField',
'PhabricatorUsersPolicyRule' => 'PhabricatorPolicyRule',
'PhabricatorUsersSearchField' => 'PhabricatorSearchTokenizerField',
'PhabricatorVCSResponse' => 'AphrontResponse',
'PhabricatorVersionedDraft' => 'PhabricatorDraftDAO',
'PhabricatorVeryWowEnglishTranslation' => 'PhutilTranslation',
'PhabricatorViewerDatasource' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource',
'PhabricatorWatcherHasObjectEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhabricatorWordPressAuthProvider' => 'PhabricatorOAuth2AuthProvider',
'PhabricatorWorker' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorWorkerActiveTask' => 'PhabricatorWorkerTask',
'PhabricatorWorkerArchiveTask' => 'PhabricatorWorkerTask',
'PhabricatorWorkerArchiveTaskQuery' => 'PhabricatorQuery',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJob' => array(
'PhabricatorWorkerDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobCreateWorker' => 'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobWorker',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobTaskWorker' => 'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobWorker',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobType' => 'Phobject',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkJobWorker' => 'PhabricatorWorker',
'PhabricatorWorkerBulkTask' => 'PhabricatorWorkerDAO',
'PhabricatorWorkerDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorWorkerLeaseQuery' => 'PhabricatorQuery',
'PhabricatorWorkerManagementCancelWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorWorkerManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorWorkerManagementExecuteWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorWorkerManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorWorkerManagementFloodWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorWorkerManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorWorkerManagementFreeWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorWorkerManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorWorkerManagementRetryWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorWorkerManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorWorkerManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorWorkerPermanentFailureException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorWorkerSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhabricatorWorkerTask' => 'PhabricatorWorkerDAO',
'PhabricatorWorkerTaskData' => 'PhabricatorWorkerDAO',
2011-03-27 07:55:18 +02:00
'PhabricatorWorkerTaskDetailController' => 'PhabricatorDaemonController',
'PhabricatorWorkerTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorWorkerTrigger' => array(
'PhabricatorWorkerDAO',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
Implement clock/trigger infrastructure for scheduling actions Summary: Ref T6881. Hopefully, this is the hard part. This adds a new daemon (the "trigger" daemon) which processes triggers, schedules them, and then executes them at the scheduled time. The design is a little complicated, but has these goals: - High resistance to race conditions: only the application writes to the trigger table; only the daemon writes to the event table. We won't lose events if someone saves a meeting at the same time as we're sending a reminder out for it. - Execution guarantees: scheduled events are guaranteed to execute exactly once. - Support for arbitrarily large queues: the daemon will make progress even if there are millions of triggers in queue. The cost to update the queue is proportional to the number of changes in it; the cost to process the queue is proportional to the number of events to execute. - Relatively good observability: you can monitor the state of the trigger queue reasonably well from the web UI. - Modular Infrastructure: this is a very low-level construct that Calendar, Phortune, etc., should be able to build on top of. It doesn't have this stuff yet: - Not very robust to bad actions: a misbehaving trigger can stop the queue fairly easily. This is OK for now since we aren't planning to make it part of any other applications for a while. We do still get execute-exaclty-once, but it might not happen for a long time (until someone goes and fixes the queue), when we could theoretically continue executing other events. - Doesn't start automatically: normal users don't need to run this thing yet so I'm not starting it by default. - Not super well tested: I've vetted the basics but haven't run real workloads through this yet. - No sophisticated tooling: I added some basic stuff but it's missing some pieces we'll have to build sooner or later, e.g. `bin/trigger cancel` or whatever. - Intentionally not realtime: This design puts execution guarantees far above realtime concerns, and will not give you precise event execution at 1-second resolution. I think this is the correct goal to pursue architecturally, and certainly correct for subscriptions and meeting reminders. Events which execute after they have become irrelevant can simply decline to do anything (like a meeting reminder which executes after the meeting is over). In general, the expectation for applications is: - When creating an object (like a calendar event) that needs to trigger a scheduled action, write a trigger (and save the PHID if you plan to update it later). - The daemon will process the event and schedule the action efficiently, in a race-free way. - If you want to move the action, update the trigger and the daemon will take care of it. - Your action will eventually dump a task into the task queue, and the task daemons will actually perform it. Test Plan: Using a test script like this: ``` <?php require_once 'scripts/__init_script__.php'; $trigger = id(new PhabricatorWorkerTrigger()) ->setAction( new PhabricatorLogTriggerAction( array( 'message' => 'test', ))) ->setClock( new PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock( array( 'period' => 33, ))) ->save(); var_dump($trigger); ``` ...I queued triggers and ran the daemon: - Verified triggers fire; - verified triggers reschedule; - verified trigger events show up in the web UI; - tried different periods; - added some triggers while the daemon was running; - examined `phd debug` output for anything suspicious. It seems to work in trivial use case, at least. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T6881 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11419
2015-01-16 21:13:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorWorkerTriggerEvent' => 'PhabricatorWorkerDAO',
'PhabricatorWorkerTriggerManagementFireWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorWorkerTriggerManagementWorkflow',
'PhabricatorWorkerTriggerManagementWorkflow' => 'PhabricatorManagementWorkflow',
Implement clock/trigger infrastructure for scheduling actions Summary: Ref T6881. Hopefully, this is the hard part. This adds a new daemon (the "trigger" daemon) which processes triggers, schedules them, and then executes them at the scheduled time. The design is a little complicated, but has these goals: - High resistance to race conditions: only the application writes to the trigger table; only the daemon writes to the event table. We won't lose events if someone saves a meeting at the same time as we're sending a reminder out for it. - Execution guarantees: scheduled events are guaranteed to execute exactly once. - Support for arbitrarily large queues: the daemon will make progress even if there are millions of triggers in queue. The cost to update the queue is proportional to the number of changes in it; the cost to process the queue is proportional to the number of events to execute. - Relatively good observability: you can monitor the state of the trigger queue reasonably well from the web UI. - Modular Infrastructure: this is a very low-level construct that Calendar, Phortune, etc., should be able to build on top of. It doesn't have this stuff yet: - Not very robust to bad actions: a misbehaving trigger can stop the queue fairly easily. This is OK for now since we aren't planning to make it part of any other applications for a while. We do still get execute-exaclty-once, but it might not happen for a long time (until someone goes and fixes the queue), when we could theoretically continue executing other events. - Doesn't start automatically: normal users don't need to run this thing yet so I'm not starting it by default. - Not super well tested: I've vetted the basics but haven't run real workloads through this yet. - No sophisticated tooling: I added some basic stuff but it's missing some pieces we'll have to build sooner or later, e.g. `bin/trigger cancel` or whatever. - Intentionally not realtime: This design puts execution guarantees far above realtime concerns, and will not give you precise event execution at 1-second resolution. I think this is the correct goal to pursue architecturally, and certainly correct for subscriptions and meeting reminders. Events which execute after they have become irrelevant can simply decline to do anything (like a meeting reminder which executes after the meeting is over). In general, the expectation for applications is: - When creating an object (like a calendar event) that needs to trigger a scheduled action, write a trigger (and save the PHID if you plan to update it later). - The daemon will process the event and schedule the action efficiently, in a race-free way. - If you want to move the action, update the trigger and the daemon will take care of it. - Your action will eventually dump a task into the task queue, and the task daemons will actually perform it. Test Plan: Using a test script like this: ``` <?php require_once 'scripts/__init_script__.php'; $trigger = id(new PhabricatorWorkerTrigger()) ->setAction( new PhabricatorLogTriggerAction( array( 'message' => 'test', ))) ->setClock( new PhabricatorMetronomicTriggerClock( array( 'period' => 33, ))) ->save(); var_dump($trigger); ``` ...I queued triggers and ran the daemon: - Verified triggers fire; - verified triggers reschedule; - verified trigger events show up in the web UI; - tried different periods; - added some triggers while the daemon was running; - examined `phd debug` output for anything suspicious. It seems to work in trivial use case, at least. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T6881 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11419
2015-01-16 21:13:31 +01:00
'PhabricatorWorkerTriggerPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhabricatorWorkerTriggerQuery' => 'PhabricatorPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhabricatorWorkerYieldException' => 'Exception',
'PhabricatorWorkingCopyDiscoveryTestCase' => 'PhabricatorWorkingCopyTestCase',
'PhabricatorWorkingCopyPullTestCase' => 'PhabricatorWorkingCopyTestCase',
'PhabricatorWorkingCopyTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhabricatorXHPASTDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhabricatorXHPASTParseTree' => 'PhabricatorXHPASTDAO',
2011-04-07 04:17:05 +02:00
'PhabricatorXHPASTViewController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorXHPASTViewFrameController' => 'PhabricatorXHPASTViewController',
'PhabricatorXHPASTViewFramesetController' => 'PhabricatorXHPASTViewController',
'PhabricatorXHPASTViewInputController' => 'PhabricatorXHPASTViewPanelController',
'PhabricatorXHPASTViewPanelController' => 'PhabricatorXHPASTViewController',
'PhabricatorXHPASTViewRunController' => 'PhabricatorXHPASTViewController',
'PhabricatorXHPASTViewStreamController' => 'PhabricatorXHPASTViewPanelController',
'PhabricatorXHPASTViewTreeController' => 'PhabricatorXHPASTViewPanelController',
'PhabricatorXHProfApplication' => 'PhabricatorApplication',
2011-02-02 22:48:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorXHProfController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhabricatorXHProfDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
2011-02-02 22:48:52 +01:00
'PhabricatorXHProfProfileController' => 'PhabricatorXHProfController',
'PhabricatorXHProfProfileSymbolView' => 'PhabricatorXHProfProfileView',
'PhabricatorXHProfProfileTopLevelView' => 'PhabricatorXHProfProfileView',
'PhabricatorXHProfProfileView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhabricatorXHProfSample' => 'PhabricatorXHProfDAO',
'PhabricatorXHProfSampleListController' => 'PhabricatorXHProfController',
'PhabricatorYoutubeRemarkupRule' => 'PhutilRemarkupRule',
'PhameBlog' => array(
'PhameDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
),
'PhameBlogArchiveController' => 'PhameBlogController',
'PhameBlogController' => 'PhameController',
'PhameBlogCreateCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PhameBlogEditController' => 'PhameBlogController',
'PhameBlogEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhameBlogFeedController' => 'PhameBlogController',
'PhameBlogListController' => 'PhameBlogController',
'PhameBlogListView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PhameBlogManageController' => 'PhameBlogController',
'PhameBlogProfilePictureController' => 'PhameBlogController',
'PhameBlogQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhameBlogReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'PhameBlogSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhameBlogSite' => 'PhameSite',
'PhameBlogTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhameBlogTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
Remove skins from Phame Summary: Ref T9897. Purge a bunch of stuff: - Remove skins. - Remove all custom sites for skin resources. - Remove "framed", "notlive", "preview", separate "live" controllers (see below). - Merge "publish" and "unpublish" controllers into one. New behavior: - Blogs and posts have three views: - "View": Internal view URI, which is a normal detail page. - "Internal Live": Internal view URI which is a little prettier. - "External Live": External view URI for an external domain. Right now, the differences are pretty minor (basically, different crumbs/chrome). This mostly gives us room to put some milder flavor of skins back later (photography or more "presentation" elements, for example). This removes 9 million lines of code so I probably missed a couple of things, but I think it's like 95% of the way there. Test Plan: Here are some examples of what the "view", "internal" and "external" views look like for blogs (posts are similar): "View": Unchanged {F1021634} "Internal": No chrome or footer. Still write actions (edit, post commments). Has crumbs to get back into Phame. {F1021635} "External": No chrome or footer. No write actions. No Phabricator crumbs. No policy/status information. {F1021638} I figure we'll probably tweak these a bit to figure out what makes sense (like: maybe no actions on "internal, live"? and "external, live" probably needs a way to set a root "Company >" crumb?) but that they're reasonable-ish as a first cut? Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9897 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14740
2015-12-11 16:07:45 +01:00
'PhameBlogViewController' => 'PhameLiveController',
'PhameConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'PhameConstants' => 'Phobject',
'PhameController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhameCreatePostConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhameConduitAPIMethod',
'PhameDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhameDescriptionView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PhameDraftListView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PhameHomeController' => 'PhamePostController',
Remove skins from Phame Summary: Ref T9897. Purge a bunch of stuff: - Remove skins. - Remove all custom sites for skin resources. - Remove "framed", "notlive", "preview", separate "live" controllers (see below). - Merge "publish" and "unpublish" controllers into one. New behavior: - Blogs and posts have three views: - "View": Internal view URI, which is a normal detail page. - "Internal Live": Internal view URI which is a little prettier. - "External Live": External view URI for an external domain. Right now, the differences are pretty minor (basically, different crumbs/chrome). This mostly gives us room to put some milder flavor of skins back later (photography or more "presentation" elements, for example). This removes 9 million lines of code so I probably missed a couple of things, but I think it's like 95% of the way there. Test Plan: Here are some examples of what the "view", "internal" and "external" views look like for blogs (posts are similar): "View": Unchanged {F1021634} "Internal": No chrome or footer. Still write actions (edit, post commments). Has crumbs to get back into Phame. {F1021635} "External": No chrome or footer. No write actions. No Phabricator crumbs. No policy/status information. {F1021638} I figure we'll probably tweak these a bit to figure out what makes sense (like: maybe no actions on "internal, live"? and "external, live" probably needs a way to set a root "Company >" crumb?) but that they're reasonable-ish as a first cut? Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9897 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14740
2015-12-11 16:07:45 +01:00
'PhameLiveController' => 'PhameController',
'PhamePost' => array(
'PhameDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface',
),
'PhamePostCommentController' => 'PhamePostController',
'PhamePostController' => 'PhameController',
'PhamePostEditController' => 'PhamePostController',
'PhamePostEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhamePostHistoryController' => 'PhamePostController',
'PhamePostListController' => 'PhamePostController',
'PhamePostListView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PhamePostMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver',
'PhamePostMoveController' => 'PhamePostController',
'PhamePostPublishController' => 'PhamePostController',
'PhamePostQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhamePostReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'PhamePostSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhamePostTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhamePostTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'PhamePostTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
Remove skins from Phame Summary: Ref T9897. Purge a bunch of stuff: - Remove skins. - Remove all custom sites for skin resources. - Remove "framed", "notlive", "preview", separate "live" controllers (see below). - Merge "publish" and "unpublish" controllers into one. New behavior: - Blogs and posts have three views: - "View": Internal view URI, which is a normal detail page. - "Internal Live": Internal view URI which is a little prettier. - "External Live": External view URI for an external domain. Right now, the differences are pretty minor (basically, different crumbs/chrome). This mostly gives us room to put some milder flavor of skins back later (photography or more "presentation" elements, for example). This removes 9 million lines of code so I probably missed a couple of things, but I think it's like 95% of the way there. Test Plan: Here are some examples of what the "view", "internal" and "external" views look like for blogs (posts are similar): "View": Unchanged {F1021634} "Internal": No chrome or footer. Still write actions (edit, post commments). Has crumbs to get back into Phame. {F1021635} "External": No chrome or footer. No write actions. No Phabricator crumbs. No policy/status information. {F1021638} I figure we'll probably tweak these a bit to figure out what makes sense (like: maybe no actions on "internal, live"? and "external, live" probably needs a way to set a root "Company >" crumb?) but that they're reasonable-ish as a first cut? Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T9897 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14740
2015-12-11 16:07:45 +01:00
'PhamePostViewController' => 'PhameLiveController',
'PhameQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhameConduitAPIMethod',
'PhameQueryPostsConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhameConduitAPIMethod',
'PhameSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhameSite' => 'PhabricatorSite',
'PhluxController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhluxDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhluxEditController' => 'PhluxController',
'PhluxListController' => 'PhluxController',
'PhluxTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhluxTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhluxVariable' => array(
'PhluxDAO',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhluxVariableEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhluxVariablePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhluxVariableQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhluxViewController' => 'PhluxController',
'PholioActionMenuEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
'PholioController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PholioDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PholioDefaultEditCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PholioDefaultViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PholioImage' => array(
'PholioDAO',
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PholioImagePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PholioImageQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PholioImageUploadController' => 'PholioController',
'PholioInlineController' => 'PholioController',
'PholioInlineListController' => 'PholioController',
'PholioMock' => array(
'PholioDAO',
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorSpacesInterface',
'PhabricatorMentionableInterface',
),
'PholioMockArchiveController' => 'PholioController',
'PholioMockAuthorHeraldField' => 'PholioMockHeraldField',
'PholioMockCommentController' => 'PholioController',
'PholioMockDescriptionHeraldField' => 'PholioMockHeraldField',
'PholioMockEditController' => 'PholioController',
'PholioMockEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PholioMockEmbedView' => 'AphrontView',
'PholioMockHasTaskEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PholioMockHeraldField' => 'HeraldField',
'PholioMockHeraldFieldGroup' => 'HeraldFieldGroup',
'PholioMockImagesView' => 'AphrontView',
'PholioMockListController' => 'PholioController',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'PholioMockMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver',
'PholioMockNameHeraldField' => 'PholioMockHeraldField',
'PholioMockPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PholioMockQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PholioMockSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PholioMockThumbGridView' => 'AphrontView',
'PholioMockViewController' => 'PholioController',
'PholioRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'PholioReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'PholioSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
Improve Search architecture Summary: The search indexing API has several problems right now: - Always runs in-process. - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it. - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster. - Instead, make the API phid-oriented. - No uniform indexing API. - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird. - Instead, provide a uniform API. - No uniform CLI. - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers. - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing. - Not application-oriented. - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world. - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader. Test Plan: - `bin/search index` - Indexed one revision, one task. - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types. - Indexed `--all`. - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it. - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing. - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing. - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: 20after4, aran Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 23:21:31 +01:00
'PholioSearchIndexer' => 'PhabricatorSearchDocumentIndexer',
'PholioTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PholioTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'PholioTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PholioTransactionView' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionView',
'PholioUploadedImageView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhortuneAccount' => array(
'PhortuneDAO',
Transactions - deploy buildTransactionTimeline to remaining applications Summary: Ref T4712. Specifically... - Differential - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Audit - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Repository - one object needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) - Ponder - BONUS BUG FIX - leaving a comment on an answer had a bad redirect URI - both PonderQuestion and PonderAnswer needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on both "history" controllers - left a "TODO" on buildAnswers on the question view controller, which is non-standard and should be re-written eventually - Phortune - BONUS BUG FIX - fix new user "createNewAccount" code to not fatal - PhortuneAccount, PhortuneMerchant, and PhortuneCart needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on Account view, merchant view, and cart view controller - Fund - Legalpad - Nuance - NuanceSource needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Releeph (this product is kind of a mess...) - HACKQUEST - had to manually create an arcanist project to even be able to make a "product" and get started...! - BONUS BUG FIX - make sure to "setName" on product edit - ReleephProject (should be ReleepProduct...?), ReleephBranch, and ReleepRequest needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Harbormaster - HarbormasterBuildable, HarbormasterBuild, HarbormasterBuildPlan, and HarbormasterBuildStep all needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) all over the place Test Plan: foreach application, viewed the timeline(s) and made sure they still rendered Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4712 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10925
2014-12-04 00:35:47 +01:00
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
2013-03-28 17:10:34 +01:00
),
'PhortuneAccountEditController' => 'PhortuneController',
2013-03-28 17:10:34 +01:00
'PhortuneAccountEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhortuneAccountHasMemberEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhortuneAccountListController' => 'PhortuneController',
'PhortuneAccountPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
2013-03-28 17:10:34 +01:00
'PhortuneAccountQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhortuneAccountTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhortuneAccountTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhortuneAccountViewController' => 'PhortuneController',
'PhortuneAdHocCart' => 'PhortuneCartImplementation',
'PhortuneAdHocProduct' => 'PhortuneProductImplementation',
'PhortuneCart' => array(
'PhortuneDAO',
Transactions - deploy buildTransactionTimeline to remaining applications Summary: Ref T4712. Specifically... - Differential - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Audit - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Repository - one object needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) - Ponder - BONUS BUG FIX - leaving a comment on an answer had a bad redirect URI - both PonderQuestion and PonderAnswer needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on both "history" controllers - left a "TODO" on buildAnswers on the question view controller, which is non-standard and should be re-written eventually - Phortune - BONUS BUG FIX - fix new user "createNewAccount" code to not fatal - PhortuneAccount, PhortuneMerchant, and PhortuneCart needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on Account view, merchant view, and cart view controller - Fund - Legalpad - Nuance - NuanceSource needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Releeph (this product is kind of a mess...) - HACKQUEST - had to manually create an arcanist project to even be able to make a "product" and get started...! - BONUS BUG FIX - make sure to "setName" on product edit - ReleephProject (should be ReleepProduct...?), ReleephBranch, and ReleepRequest needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Harbormaster - HarbormasterBuildable, HarbormasterBuild, HarbormasterBuildPlan, and HarbormasterBuildStep all needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) all over the place Test Plan: foreach application, viewed the timeline(s) and made sure they still rendered Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4712 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10925
2014-12-04 00:35:47 +01:00
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhortuneCartAcceptController' => 'PhortuneCartController',
'PhortuneCartCancelController' => 'PhortuneCartController',
'PhortuneCartCheckoutController' => 'PhortuneCartController',
'PhortuneCartController' => 'PhortuneController',
'PhortuneCartEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhortuneCartImplementation' => 'Phobject',
'PhortuneCartListController' => 'PhortuneController',
'PhortuneCartPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhortuneCartQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhortuneCartReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'PhortuneCartSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhortuneCartTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhortuneCartTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhortuneCartUpdateController' => 'PhortuneCartController',
'PhortuneCartViewController' => 'PhortuneCartController',
'PhortuneCharge' => array(
'PhortuneDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhortuneChargeListController' => 'PhortuneController',
'PhortuneChargePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhortuneChargeQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhortuneChargeSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhortuneChargeTableView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhortuneConstants' => 'Phobject',
2013-03-28 17:10:34 +01:00
'PhortuneController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhortuneCreditCardForm' => 'Phobject',
'PhortuneCurrency' => 'Phobject',
'PhortuneCurrencySerializer' => 'PhabricatorLiskSerializer',
'PhortuneCurrencyTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
2013-03-28 17:10:34 +01:00
'PhortuneDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhortuneErrCode' => 'PhortuneConstants',
2013-03-28 17:10:34 +01:00
'PhortuneLandingController' => 'PhortuneController',
'PhortuneMemberHasAccountEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhortuneMemberHasMerchantEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
Add Merchants to Phortune Summary: Ref T2787. Currently, you add payment providers (Stripe, Paypal, etc) in global configuration. Generally, this approach is cumbersome, limiting, and often hard for users to figure out. It also doesn't provide a natural way to segment payment receivers or provide web access to administrative payment functions like issuing refunds, canceling orders, etc. I think that stuff definitely needs to be in the web UI, and the rule for access to it can't reasonably just be "all administrators" in a lot of reasonable cases. The only real advantage is that it prevents an attacker from adjusting settings and pointing something at an account they control. But this attack can be mitigated through notifications, some sort of CLI-only merchant lock, payment accounts being relatively identifiable, etc. So introduce "merchants", which are basically payable entities. An individual merchant will have attached Paypal, Stripe, etc., accounts, and access rules. When you buy something in an application, the merchant to pay is also specified. They also provide an umbrella for dealing with permissions down the line. This may get a //little// cumbersome because if there are several merchants your saved card information is not shared across them. I think that will be fine in the normal case (most installs will have only one merchant). Even if it isn't and we leave providers global, I think introducing this is the right call from a web UI / permissions point of view. I'll play around with it in the next couple of diffs and figure out exactly where the line goes. Test Plan: Listed, created, edited, viewed merchants. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T2787 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10648
2014-10-07 19:55:16 +02:00
'PhortuneMerchant' => array(
'PhortuneDAO',
Transactions - deploy buildTransactionTimeline to remaining applications Summary: Ref T4712. Specifically... - Differential - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Audit - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Repository - one object needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) - Ponder - BONUS BUG FIX - leaving a comment on an answer had a bad redirect URI - both PonderQuestion and PonderAnswer needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on both "history" controllers - left a "TODO" on buildAnswers on the question view controller, which is non-standard and should be re-written eventually - Phortune - BONUS BUG FIX - fix new user "createNewAccount" code to not fatal - PhortuneAccount, PhortuneMerchant, and PhortuneCart needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on Account view, merchant view, and cart view controller - Fund - Legalpad - Nuance - NuanceSource needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Releeph (this product is kind of a mess...) - HACKQUEST - had to manually create an arcanist project to even be able to make a "product" and get started...! - BONUS BUG FIX - make sure to "setName" on product edit - ReleephProject (should be ReleepProduct...?), ReleephBranch, and ReleepRequest needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Harbormaster - HarbormasterBuildable, HarbormasterBuild, HarbormasterBuildPlan, and HarbormasterBuildStep all needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) all over the place Test Plan: foreach application, viewed the timeline(s) and made sure they still rendered Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4712 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10925
2014-12-04 00:35:47 +01:00
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
Add Merchants to Phortune Summary: Ref T2787. Currently, you add payment providers (Stripe, Paypal, etc) in global configuration. Generally, this approach is cumbersome, limiting, and often hard for users to figure out. It also doesn't provide a natural way to segment payment receivers or provide web access to administrative payment functions like issuing refunds, canceling orders, etc. I think that stuff definitely needs to be in the web UI, and the rule for access to it can't reasonably just be "all administrators" in a lot of reasonable cases. The only real advantage is that it prevents an attacker from adjusting settings and pointing something at an account they control. But this attack can be mitigated through notifications, some sort of CLI-only merchant lock, payment accounts being relatively identifiable, etc. So introduce "merchants", which are basically payable entities. An individual merchant will have attached Paypal, Stripe, etc., accounts, and access rules. When you buy something in an application, the merchant to pay is also specified. They also provide an umbrella for dealing with permissions down the line. This may get a //little// cumbersome because if there are several merchants your saved card information is not shared across them. I think that will be fine in the normal case (most installs will have only one merchant). Even if it isn't and we leave providers global, I think introducing this is the right call from a web UI / permissions point of view. I'll play around with it in the next couple of diffs and figure out exactly where the line goes. Test Plan: Listed, created, edited, viewed merchants. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T2787 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10648
2014-10-07 19:55:16 +02:00
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhortuneMerchantCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PhortuneMerchantController' => 'PhortuneController',
'PhortuneMerchantEditController' => 'PhortuneMerchantController',
'PhortuneMerchantEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhortuneMerchantHasMemberEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PhortuneMerchantInvoiceCreateController' => 'PhortuneMerchantController',
Add Merchants to Phortune Summary: Ref T2787. Currently, you add payment providers (Stripe, Paypal, etc) in global configuration. Generally, this approach is cumbersome, limiting, and often hard for users to figure out. It also doesn't provide a natural way to segment payment receivers or provide web access to administrative payment functions like issuing refunds, canceling orders, etc. I think that stuff definitely needs to be in the web UI, and the rule for access to it can't reasonably just be "all administrators" in a lot of reasonable cases. The only real advantage is that it prevents an attacker from adjusting settings and pointing something at an account they control. But this attack can be mitigated through notifications, some sort of CLI-only merchant lock, payment accounts being relatively identifiable, etc. So introduce "merchants", which are basically payable entities. An individual merchant will have attached Paypal, Stripe, etc., accounts, and access rules. When you buy something in an application, the merchant to pay is also specified. They also provide an umbrella for dealing with permissions down the line. This may get a //little// cumbersome because if there are several merchants your saved card information is not shared across them. I think that will be fine in the normal case (most installs will have only one merchant). Even if it isn't and we leave providers global, I think introducing this is the right call from a web UI / permissions point of view. I'll play around with it in the next couple of diffs and figure out exactly where the line goes. Test Plan: Listed, created, edited, viewed merchants. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T2787 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10648
2014-10-07 19:55:16 +02:00
'PhortuneMerchantListController' => 'PhortuneMerchantController',
'PhortuneMerchantPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhortuneMerchantQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhortuneMerchantSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhortuneMerchantTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhortuneMerchantTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhortuneMerchantViewController' => 'PhortuneMerchantController',
'PhortuneMonthYearExpiryControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'PhortuneOrderTableView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhortunePayPalPaymentProvider' => 'PhortunePaymentProvider',
'PhortunePaymentMethod' => array(
'PhortuneDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
2013-03-28 17:10:34 +01:00
),
'PhortunePaymentMethodCreateController' => 'PhortuneController',
'PhortunePaymentMethodDisableController' => 'PhortuneController',
'PhortunePaymentMethodEditController' => 'PhortuneController',
'PhortunePaymentMethodPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhortunePaymentMethodQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhortunePaymentProvider' => 'Phobject',
'PhortunePaymentProviderConfig' => array(
'PhortuneDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhortunePaymentProviderConfigEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhortunePaymentProviderConfigQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhortunePaymentProviderConfigTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhortunePaymentProviderConfigTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PhortunePaymentProviderPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhortunePaymentProviderTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhortuneProduct' => array(
'PhortuneDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhortuneProductImplementation' => 'Phobject',
'PhortuneProductListController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhortuneProductPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhortuneProductQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhortuneProductViewController' => 'PhortuneController',
'PhortuneProviderActionController' => 'PhortuneController',
'PhortuneProviderDisableController' => 'PhortuneMerchantController',
'PhortuneProviderEditController' => 'PhortuneMerchantController',
'PhortunePurchase' => array(
'PhortuneDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhortunePurchasePHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhortunePurchaseQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhortuneSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhortuneStripePaymentProvider' => 'PhortunePaymentProvider',
'PhortuneSubscription' => array(
'PhortuneDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhortuneSubscriptionCart' => 'PhortuneCartImplementation',
'PhortuneSubscriptionEditController' => 'PhortuneController',
'PhortuneSubscriptionImplementation' => 'Phobject',
'PhortuneSubscriptionListController' => 'PhortuneController',
'PhortuneSubscriptionPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhortuneSubscriptionProduct' => 'PhortuneProductImplementation',
'PhortuneSubscriptionQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhortuneSubscriptionSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhortuneSubscriptionTableView' => 'AphrontView',
'PhortuneSubscriptionViewController' => 'PhortuneController',
'PhortuneSubscriptionWorker' => 'PhabricatorWorker',
'PhortuneTestPaymentProvider' => 'PhortunePaymentProvider',
'PhortuneWePayPaymentProvider' => 'PhortunePaymentProvider',
'PhragmentBrowseController' => 'PhragmentController',
'PhragmentCanCreateCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PhragmentConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'PhragmentController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhragmentCreateController' => 'PhragmentController',
'PhragmentDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhragmentFragment' => array(
'PhragmentDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhragmentFragmentPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhragmentFragmentQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhragmentFragmentVersion' => array(
'PhragmentDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhragmentFragmentVersionPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhragmentFragmentVersionQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhragmentGetPatchConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhragmentConduitAPIMethod',
'PhragmentHistoryController' => 'PhragmentController',
'PhragmentPatchController' => 'PhragmentController',
'PhragmentPatchUtil' => 'Phobject',
'PhragmentPolicyController' => 'PhragmentController',
'PhragmentQueryFragmentsConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhragmentConduitAPIMethod',
'PhragmentRevertController' => 'PhragmentController',
'PhragmentSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhragmentSnapshot' => array(
'PhragmentDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhragmentSnapshotChild' => array(
'PhragmentDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhragmentSnapshotChildQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhragmentSnapshotCreateController' => 'PhragmentController',
'PhragmentSnapshotDeleteController' => 'PhragmentController',
'PhragmentSnapshotPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhragmentSnapshotPromoteController' => 'PhragmentController',
'PhragmentSnapshotQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhragmentSnapshotViewController' => 'PhragmentController',
'PhragmentUpdateController' => 'PhragmentController',
'PhragmentVersionController' => 'PhragmentController',
'PhragmentZIPController' => 'PhragmentController',
'PhrequentConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'PhrequentController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhrequentDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhrequentListController' => 'PhrequentController',
'PhrequentPopConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhrequentConduitAPIMethod',
'PhrequentPushConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhrequentConduitAPIMethod',
'PhrequentSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PhrequentTimeBlock' => 'Phobject',
'PhrequentTimeBlockTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'PhrequentTimeSlices' => 'Phobject',
'PhrequentTrackController' => 'PhrequentController',
'PhrequentTrackingConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhrequentConduitAPIMethod',
'PhrequentTrackingEditor' => 'PhabricatorEditor',
'PhrequentUIEventListener' => 'PhabricatorEventListener',
'PhrequentUserTime' => array(
'PhrequentDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'PhrequentUserTimeQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhrictionChangeType' => 'PhrictionConstants',
'PhrictionConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'PhrictionConstants' => 'Phobject',
'PhrictionContent' => array(
'PhrictionDAO',
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
Add a generic multistep Markup cache Summary: The immediate issue this addresses is T1366, adding a rendering cache to Phriction. For wiki pages with code blocks especially, rerendering them each time is expensive. The broader issue is that out markup caches aren't very good right now. They have three major problems: **Problem 1: the data is stored in the wrong place.** We currently store remarkup caches on objects. This means we're always loading it and passing it around even when we don't need it, can't genericize cache management code (e.g., have one simple script to drop/GC caches), need to update authoritative rows to clear caches, and can't genericize rendering code since each object is different. To solve this, I created a dedicated cache database that I plan to move all markup caches to use. **Problem 2: time-variant rules break when cached.** Some rules like `**bold**` are time-invariant and always produce the same output, but some rules like `{Tnnn}` and `@username` are variant and may render differently (because a task was closed or a user is on vacation). Currently, we cache the raw output, so these time-variant rules get locked at whatever values they had when they were first rendered. This is the main reason Phriction doesn't have a cache right now -- I wanted `{Tnnn}` rules to reflect open/closed tasks. To solve this, I split markup into a "preprocessing" phase (which does all the parsing and evaluates all time-invariant rules) and a "postprocessing" phase (which evaluates time-variant rules only). The preprocessing phase is most of the expense (and, notably, includes syntax highlighting) so this is nearly as good as caching the final output. I did most of the work here in D737 / D738, but we never moved to use it in Phabricator -- we currently just do the two operations serially in all cases. This diff splits them apart and caches the output of preprocessing only, so we benefit from caching but also get accurate time-variant rendering. **Problem 3: cache access isn't batched/pipelined optimally.** When we're rendering a list of markup blocks, we should be able to batch datafetching better than we do. D738 helped with this (fetching is batched within a single hunk of markup) and this improves batching on cache access. We could still do better here, but this is at least a step forward. Also fixes a bug with generating a link in the Phriction history interface ($uri gets clobbered). I'm using PHP serialization instead of JSON serialization because Remarkup does some stuff with non-ascii characters that might not survive JSON. Test Plan: - Created a Phriction document and verified that previews don't go to cache (no rows appear in the cache table). - Verified that published documents come out of cache. - Verified that caches generate/regenerate correctly, time-variant rules render properly and old documents hit the right caches. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T1366 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2945
2012-07-10 00:20:56 +02:00
),
'PhrictionController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PhrictionCreateConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhrictionConduitAPIMethod',
'PhrictionDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PhrictionDeleteController' => 'PhrictionController',
'PhrictionDiffController' => 'PhrictionController',
'PhrictionDocument' => array(
'PhrictionDAO',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
),
'PhrictionDocumentAuthorHeraldField' => 'PhrictionDocumentHeraldField',
'PhrictionDocumentContentHeraldField' => 'PhrictionDocumentHeraldField',
'PhrictionDocumentController' => 'PhrictionController',
'PhrictionDocumentHeraldAdapter' => 'HeraldAdapter',
'PhrictionDocumentHeraldField' => 'HeraldField',
'PhrictionDocumentHeraldFieldGroup' => 'HeraldFieldGroup',
'PhrictionDocumentPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PhrictionDocumentPathHeraldField' => 'PhrictionDocumentHeraldField',
'PhrictionDocumentQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PhrictionDocumentStatus' => 'PhrictionConstants',
'PhrictionDocumentTitleHeraldField' => 'PhrictionDocumentHeraldField',
'PhrictionEditConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhrictionConduitAPIMethod',
'PhrictionEditController' => 'PhrictionController',
'PhrictionHistoryConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhrictionConduitAPIMethod',
'PhrictionHistoryController' => 'PhrictionController',
'PhrictionInfoConduitAPIMethod' => 'PhrictionConduitAPIMethod',
'PhrictionListController' => 'PhrictionController',
'PhrictionMoveController' => 'PhrictionController',
'PhrictionNewController' => 'PhrictionController',
'PhrictionRemarkupRule' => 'PhutilRemarkupRule',
'PhrictionReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'PhrictionSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
'PhrictionSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
Improve Search architecture Summary: The search indexing API has several problems right now: - Always runs in-process. - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it. - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster. - Instead, make the API phid-oriented. - No uniform indexing API. - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird. - Instead, provide a uniform API. - No uniform CLI. - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers. - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing. - Not application-oriented. - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world. - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader. Test Plan: - `bin/search index` - Indexed one revision, one task. - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types. - Indexed `--all`. - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it. - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing. - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing. - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: 20after4, aran Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 23:21:31 +01:00
'PhrictionSearchIndexer' => 'PhabricatorSearchDocumentIndexer',
'PhrictionTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PhrictionTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'PhrictionTransactionEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PhrictionTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PolicyLockOptionType' => 'PhabricatorConfigJSONOptionType',
'PonderAddAnswerView' => 'AphrontView',
'PonderAnswer' => array(
'PonderDAO',
Transactions - deploy buildTransactionTimeline to remaining applications Summary: Ref T4712. Specifically... - Differential - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Audit - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Repository - one object needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) - Ponder - BONUS BUG FIX - leaving a comment on an answer had a bad redirect URI - both PonderQuestion and PonderAnswer needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on both "history" controllers - left a "TODO" on buildAnswers on the question view controller, which is non-standard and should be re-written eventually - Phortune - BONUS BUG FIX - fix new user "createNewAccount" code to not fatal - PhortuneAccount, PhortuneMerchant, and PhortuneCart needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on Account view, merchant view, and cart view controller - Fund - Legalpad - Nuance - NuanceSource needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Releeph (this product is kind of a mess...) - HACKQUEST - had to manually create an arcanist project to even be able to make a "product" and get started...! - BONUS BUG FIX - make sure to "setName" on product edit - ReleephProject (should be ReleepProduct...?), ReleephBranch, and ReleepRequest needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Harbormaster - HarbormasterBuildable, HarbormasterBuild, HarbormasterBuildPlan, and HarbormasterBuildStep all needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) all over the place Test Plan: foreach application, viewed the timeline(s) and made sure they still rendered Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4712 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10925
2014-12-04 00:35:47 +01:00
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
'PonderVotableInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
),
'PonderAnswerCommentController' => 'PonderController',
'PonderAnswerEditController' => 'PonderController',
'PonderAnswerEditor' => 'PonderEditor',
'PonderAnswerHasVotingUserEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'PonderAnswerHistoryController' => 'PonderController',
'PonderAnswerMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver',
'PonderAnswerPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PonderAnswerQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PonderAnswerReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'PonderAnswerSaveController' => 'PonderController',
'PonderAnswerStatus' => 'PonderConstants',
'PonderAnswerTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PonderAnswerTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'PonderAnswerTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PonderAnswerView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PonderConstants' => 'Phobject',
'PonderController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'PonderDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'PonderDefaultViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PonderEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'PonderFooterView' => 'AphrontTagView',
'PonderHelpfulSaveController' => 'PonderController',
'PonderModerateCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'PonderQuestion' => array(
'PonderDAO',
Transactions - deploy buildTransactionTimeline to remaining applications Summary: Ref T4712. Specifically... - Differential - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Audit - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Repository - one object needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) - Ponder - BONUS BUG FIX - leaving a comment on an answer had a bad redirect URI - both PonderQuestion and PonderAnswer needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on both "history" controllers - left a "TODO" on buildAnswers on the question view controller, which is non-standard and should be re-written eventually - Phortune - BONUS BUG FIX - fix new user "createNewAccount" code to not fatal - PhortuneAccount, PhortuneMerchant, and PhortuneCart needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on Account view, merchant view, and cart view controller - Fund - Legalpad - Nuance - NuanceSource needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Releeph (this product is kind of a mess...) - HACKQUEST - had to manually create an arcanist project to even be able to make a "product" and get started...! - BONUS BUG FIX - make sure to "setName" on product edit - ReleephProject (should be ReleepProduct...?), ReleephBranch, and ReleepRequest needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Harbormaster - HarbormasterBuildable, HarbormasterBuild, HarbormasterBuildPlan, and HarbormasterBuildStep all needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) all over the place Test Plan: foreach application, viewed the timeline(s) and made sure they still rendered Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4712 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10925
2014-12-04 00:35:47 +01:00
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
'PhabricatorSubscribableInterface',
'PhabricatorFlaggableInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorTokenReceiverInterface',
'PhabricatorProjectInterface',
'PhabricatorDestructibleInterface',
'PhabricatorSpacesInterface',
),
'PonderQuestionCommentController' => 'PonderController',
'PonderQuestionEditController' => 'PonderController',
'PonderQuestionEditor' => 'PonderEditor',
'PonderQuestionHistoryController' => 'PonderController',
'PonderQuestionListController' => 'PonderController',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'PonderQuestionMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver',
'PonderQuestionPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'PonderQuestionQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'PonderQuestionReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'PonderQuestionSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'PonderQuestionStatus' => 'PonderConstants',
'PonderQuestionStatusController' => 'PonderController',
'PonderQuestionTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'PonderQuestionTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'PonderQuestionTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'PonderQuestionViewController' => 'PonderController',
'PonderRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'PonderSchemaSpec' => 'PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec',
Improve Search architecture Summary: The search indexing API has several problems right now: - Always runs in-process. - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it. - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster. - Instead, make the API phid-oriented. - No uniform indexing API. - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird. - Instead, provide a uniform API. - No uniform CLI. - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers. - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing. - Not application-oriented. - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world. - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader. Test Plan: - `bin/search index` - Indexed one revision, one task. - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types. - Indexed `--all`. - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it. - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing. - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing. - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: 20after4, aran Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 23:21:31 +01:00
'PonderSearchIndexer' => 'PhabricatorSearchDocumentIndexer',
'PonderVote' => 'PonderConstants',
'PonderVoteEditor' => 'PhabricatorEditor',
'PonderVotingUserHasAnswerEdgeType' => 'PhabricatorEdgeType',
'ProjectAddProjectsEmailCommand' => 'MetaMTAEmailTransactionCommand',
'ProjectBoardTaskCard' => 'Phobject',
'ProjectCanLockProjectsCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'ProjectConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'ProjectCreateConduitAPIMethod' => 'ProjectConduitAPIMethod',
'ProjectCreateProjectsCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'ProjectDefaultEditCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'ProjectDefaultJoinCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'ProjectDefaultViewCapability' => 'PhabricatorPolicyCapability',
'ProjectQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'ProjectConduitAPIMethod',
'ProjectRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'ProjectRemarkupRuleTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'ProjectReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'QueryFormattingTestCase' => 'PhabricatorTestCase',
'ReleephAuthorFieldSpecification' => 'ReleephFieldSpecification',
'ReleephBranch' => array(
'ReleephDAO',
Transactions - deploy buildTransactionTimeline to remaining applications Summary: Ref T4712. Specifically... - Differential - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Audit - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Repository - one object needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) - Ponder - BONUS BUG FIX - leaving a comment on an answer had a bad redirect URI - both PonderQuestion and PonderAnswer needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on both "history" controllers - left a "TODO" on buildAnswers on the question view controller, which is non-standard and should be re-written eventually - Phortune - BONUS BUG FIX - fix new user "createNewAccount" code to not fatal - PhortuneAccount, PhortuneMerchant, and PhortuneCart needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on Account view, merchant view, and cart view controller - Fund - Legalpad - Nuance - NuanceSource needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Releeph (this product is kind of a mess...) - HACKQUEST - had to manually create an arcanist project to even be able to make a "product" and get started...! - BONUS BUG FIX - make sure to "setName" on product edit - ReleephProject (should be ReleepProduct...?), ReleephBranch, and ReleepRequest needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Harbormaster - HarbormasterBuildable, HarbormasterBuild, HarbormasterBuildPlan, and HarbormasterBuildStep all needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) all over the place Test Plan: foreach application, viewed the timeline(s) and made sure they still rendered Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4712 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10925
2014-12-04 00:35:47 +01:00
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'ReleephBranchAccessController' => 'ReleephBranchController',
'ReleephBranchCommitFieldSpecification' => 'ReleephFieldSpecification',
'ReleephBranchController' => 'ReleephController',
'ReleephBranchCreateController' => 'ReleephProductController',
'ReleephBranchEditController' => 'ReleephBranchController',
'ReleephBranchEditor' => 'PhabricatorEditor',
'ReleephBranchHistoryController' => 'ReleephBranchController',
'ReleephBranchNamePreviewController' => 'ReleephController',
'ReleephBranchPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'ReleephBranchPreviewView' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'ReleephBranchQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'ReleephBranchSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'ReleephBranchTemplate' => 'Phobject',
'ReleephBranchTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'ReleephBranchTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'ReleephBranchViewController' => 'ReleephBranchController',
'ReleephCommitFinder' => 'Phobject',
'ReleephCommitFinderException' => 'Exception',
'ReleephCommitMessageFieldSpecification' => 'ReleephFieldSpecification',
'ReleephConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'ReleephController' => 'PhabricatorController',
'ReleephDAO' => 'PhabricatorLiskDAO',
'ReleephDefaultFieldSelector' => 'ReleephFieldSelector',
'ReleephDependsOnFieldSpecification' => 'ReleephFieldSpecification',
'ReleephDiffChurnFieldSpecification' => 'ReleephFieldSpecification',
'ReleephDiffMessageFieldSpecification' => 'ReleephFieldSpecification',
'ReleephDiffSizeFieldSpecification' => 'ReleephFieldSpecification',
'ReleephFieldParseException' => 'Exception',
'ReleephFieldSelector' => 'Phobject',
'ReleephFieldSpecification' => array(
'PhabricatorCustomField',
'PhabricatorMarkupInterface',
),
'ReleephGetBranchesConduitAPIMethod' => 'ReleephConduitAPIMethod',
'ReleephIntentFieldSpecification' => 'ReleephFieldSpecification',
'ReleephLevelFieldSpecification' => 'ReleephFieldSpecification',
'ReleephOriginalCommitFieldSpecification' => 'ReleephFieldSpecification',
'ReleephProductActionController' => 'ReleephProductController',
'ReleephProductController' => 'ReleephController',
'ReleephProductCreateController' => 'ReleephProductController',
'ReleephProductEditController' => 'ReleephProductController',
'ReleephProductEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'ReleephProductHistoryController' => 'ReleephProductController',
'ReleephProductListController' => 'ReleephController',
'ReleephProductPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'ReleephProductQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'ReleephProductSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'ReleephProductTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'ReleephProductTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'ReleephProductViewController' => 'ReleephProductController',
'ReleephProject' => array(
'ReleephDAO',
Transactions - deploy buildTransactionTimeline to remaining applications Summary: Ref T4712. Specifically... - Differential - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Audit - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Repository - one object needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) - Ponder - BONUS BUG FIX - leaving a comment on an answer had a bad redirect URI - both PonderQuestion and PonderAnswer needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on both "history" controllers - left a "TODO" on buildAnswers on the question view controller, which is non-standard and should be re-written eventually - Phortune - BONUS BUG FIX - fix new user "createNewAccount" code to not fatal - PhortuneAccount, PhortuneMerchant, and PhortuneCart needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on Account view, merchant view, and cart view controller - Fund - Legalpad - Nuance - NuanceSource needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Releeph (this product is kind of a mess...) - HACKQUEST - had to manually create an arcanist project to even be able to make a "product" and get started...! - BONUS BUG FIX - make sure to "setName" on product edit - ReleephProject (should be ReleepProduct...?), ReleephBranch, and ReleepRequest needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Harbormaster - HarbormasterBuildable, HarbormasterBuild, HarbormasterBuildPlan, and HarbormasterBuildStep all needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) all over the place Test Plan: foreach application, viewed the timeline(s) and made sure they still rendered Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4712 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10925
2014-12-04 00:35:47 +01:00
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
),
'ReleephQueryBranchesConduitAPIMethod' => 'ReleephConduitAPIMethod',
'ReleephQueryProductsConduitAPIMethod' => 'ReleephConduitAPIMethod',
'ReleephQueryRequestsConduitAPIMethod' => 'ReleephConduitAPIMethod',
'ReleephReasonFieldSpecification' => 'ReleephFieldSpecification',
'ReleephRequest' => array(
'ReleephDAO',
Transactions - deploy buildTransactionTimeline to remaining applications Summary: Ref T4712. Specifically... - Differential - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Audit - needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented - Repository - one object needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) - Ponder - BONUS BUG FIX - leaving a comment on an answer had a bad redirect URI - both PonderQuestion and PonderAnswer needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on both "history" controllers - left a "TODO" on buildAnswers on the question view controller, which is non-standard and should be re-written eventually - Phortune - BONUS BUG FIX - fix new user "createNewAccount" code to not fatal - PhortuneAccount, PhortuneMerchant, and PhortuneCart needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) on Account view, merchant view, and cart view controller - Fund - Legalpad - Nuance - NuanceSource needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Releeph (this product is kind of a mess...) - HACKQUEST - had to manually create an arcanist project to even be able to make a "product" and get started...! - BONUS BUG FIX - make sure to "setName" on product edit - ReleephProject (should be ReleepProduct...?), ReleephBranch, and ReleepRequest needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - Harbormaster - HarbormasterBuildable, HarbormasterBuild, HarbormasterBuildPlan, and HarbormasterBuildStep all needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented - setShouldTerminate(true) all over the place Test Plan: foreach application, viewed the timeline(s) and made sure they still rendered Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T4712 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10925
2014-12-04 00:35:47 +01:00
'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface',
'PhabricatorPolicyInterface',
'PhabricatorCustomFieldInterface',
),
'ReleephRequestActionController' => 'ReleephRequestController',
'ReleephRequestCommentController' => 'ReleephRequestController',
'ReleephRequestConduitAPIMethod' => 'ReleephConduitAPIMethod',
'ReleephRequestController' => 'ReleephController',
'ReleephRequestDifferentialCreateController' => 'ReleephController',
'ReleephRequestEditController' => 'ReleephBranchController',
2013-05-14 19:57:41 +02:00
'ReleephRequestMailReceiver' => 'PhabricatorObjectMailReceiver',
'ReleephRequestPHIDType' => 'PhabricatorPHIDType',
'ReleephRequestQuery' => 'PhabricatorCursorPagedPolicyAwareQuery',
'ReleephRequestReplyHandler' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionReplyHandler',
'ReleephRequestSearchEngine' => 'PhabricatorApplicationSearchEngine',
'ReleephRequestStatus' => 'Phobject',
'ReleephRequestTransaction' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransaction',
'ReleephRequestTransactionComment' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionComment',
'ReleephRequestTransactionQuery' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionQuery',
'ReleephRequestTransactionalEditor' => 'PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor',
'ReleephRequestTypeaheadControl' => 'AphrontFormControl',
'ReleephRequestTypeaheadController' => 'PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasourceController',
'ReleephRequestView' => 'AphrontView',
'ReleephRequestViewController' => 'ReleephBranchController',
'ReleephRequestorFieldSpecification' => 'ReleephFieldSpecification',
'ReleephRevisionFieldSpecification' => 'ReleephFieldSpecification',
'ReleephSeverityFieldSpecification' => 'ReleephLevelFieldSpecification',
'ReleephSummaryFieldSpecification' => 'ReleephFieldSpecification',
'ReleephWorkCanPushConduitAPIMethod' => 'ReleephConduitAPIMethod',
'ReleephWorkGetAuthorInfoConduitAPIMethod' => 'ReleephConduitAPIMethod',
'ReleephWorkGetBranchCommitMessageConduitAPIMethod' => 'ReleephConduitAPIMethod',
'ReleephWorkGetBranchConduitAPIMethod' => 'ReleephConduitAPIMethod',
'ReleephWorkGetCommitMessageConduitAPIMethod' => 'ReleephConduitAPIMethod',
'ReleephWorkNextRequestConduitAPIMethod' => 'ReleephConduitAPIMethod',
'ReleephWorkRecordConduitAPIMethod' => 'ReleephConduitAPIMethod',
'ReleephWorkRecordPickStatusConduitAPIMethod' => 'ReleephConduitAPIMethod',
'RemarkupProcessConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'RepositoryConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'RepositoryCreateConduitAPIMethod' => 'RepositoryConduitAPIMethod',
'RepositoryQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'RepositoryConduitAPIMethod',
'ShellLogView' => 'AphrontView',
'SlowvoteConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'SlowvoteEmbedView' => 'AphrontView',
'SlowvoteInfoConduitAPIMethod' => 'SlowvoteConduitAPIMethod',
'SlowvoteRemarkupRule' => 'PhabricatorObjectRemarkupRule',
'SubscriptionListDialogBuilder' => 'Phobject',
'SubscriptionListStringBuilder' => 'Phobject',
'TokenConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'TokenGiveConduitAPIMethod' => 'TokenConduitAPIMethod',
'TokenGivenConduitAPIMethod' => 'TokenConduitAPIMethod',
'TokenQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'TokenConduitAPIMethod',
'UserConduitAPIMethod' => 'ConduitAPIMethod',
'UserDisableConduitAPIMethod' => 'UserConduitAPIMethod',
'UserEnableConduitAPIMethod' => 'UserConduitAPIMethod',
'UserFindConduitAPIMethod' => 'UserConduitAPIMethod',
'UserQueryConduitAPIMethod' => 'UserConduitAPIMethod',
'UserWhoAmIConduitAPIMethod' => 'UserConduitAPIMethod',
),
));