revi-archive/phorge-phorge
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2025-03-11 03:44:48 +01:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
phorge-phorge/resources/sql/patches/124.subpriority.sql

12 lines
352 B
MySQL
Raw Normal View History

Allow tasks to be subprioritized by drag-and-drop Summary: Like the title says, similar to Facebook Tasks. Not sure how I really feel about this, but I guess it's kind of OK? I never used this feature in Facebook Tasks but I think some people like it. The drag-and-drop to repri across priorities feels okayish. Because subpriority is a double and we just split the difference when reprioritizing, you lose ~a bit of precision every time you repri two tasks against each other and so you can break it by swapping the priorities of two tasks ~50 times. This case is pretty silly and pathological. We can add some code to deal with this at some point if necessary. I think this also fixes the whacky task layout widths once and for all. (There are a couple of minor UI glitches like headers not vanishing and header counts not updating that I'm not fixing because I am lazy.) Test Plan: Dragged and dropped tasks around. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, epriestley, mgummelt Maniphest Tasks: T859 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1731
2012-04-02 12:12:04 -07:00
ALTER TABLE phabricator_maniphest.maniphest_task
ADD subpriority DOUBLE NOT NULL;
ALTER TABLE phabricator_maniphest.maniphest_task
ADD KEY (priority, subpriority);
/* Seed the subpriority column with reasonable values that keep order stable. */
UPDATE phabricator_maniphest.maniphest_task
Minor, subpriority default previously reverse ordered eveything Auditors: btrahan
2012-04-02 12:26:50 -07:00
SET subpriority = (UNIX_TIMESTAMP() - dateModified);
Allow tasks to be subprioritized by drag-and-drop Summary: Like the title says, similar to Facebook Tasks. Not sure how I really feel about this, but I guess it's kind of OK? I never used this feature in Facebook Tasks but I think some people like it. The drag-and-drop to repri across priorities feels okayish. Because subpriority is a double and we just split the difference when reprioritizing, you lose ~a bit of precision every time you repri two tasks against each other and so you can break it by swapping the priorities of two tasks ~50 times. This case is pretty silly and pathological. We can add some code to deal with this at some point if necessary. I think this also fixes the whacky task layout widths once and for all. (There are a couple of minor UI glitches like headers not vanishing and header counts not updating that I'm not fixing because I am lazy.) Test Plan: Dragged and dropped tasks around. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, epriestley, mgummelt Maniphest Tasks: T859 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1731
2012-04-02 12:12:04 -07:00
Copy permalink