2015-12-02 23:38:11 +01:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* @provides javelin-behavior-comment-actions
|
|
|
|
* @requires javelin-behavior
|
|
|
|
* javelin-stratcom
|
|
|
|
* javelin-workflow
|
|
|
|
* javelin-dom
|
|
|
|
* phuix-form-control-view
|
|
|
|
* phuix-icon-view
|
2015-12-23 03:07:57 +01:00
|
|
|
* javelin-behavior-phabricator-gesture
|
2015-12-02 23:38:11 +01:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JX.behavior('comment-actions', function(config) {
|
|
|
|
var action_map = config.actions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var action_node = JX.$(config.actionID);
|
|
|
|
var form_node = JX.$(config.formID);
|
|
|
|
var input_node = JX.$(config.inputID);
|
2015-12-04 15:59:58 +01:00
|
|
|
var place_node = JX.$(config.placeID);
|
2015-12-02 23:38:11 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var rows = {};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JX.DOM.listen(action_node, 'change', null, function() {
|
2015-12-04 23:37:27 +01:00
|
|
|
var option = find_option(action_node.value);
|
2015-12-02 23:38:11 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
action_node.value = '+';
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-04 23:37:27 +01:00
|
|
|
if (option) {
|
|
|
|
add_row(option);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
function find_option(key) {
|
|
|
|
var options = action_node.options;
|
|
|
|
var option;
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-02 23:38:11 +01:00
|
|
|
for (var ii = 0; ii < options.length; ii++) {
|
|
|
|
option = options[ii];
|
2015-12-04 23:37:27 +01:00
|
|
|
if (option.value == key) {
|
|
|
|
return option;
|
2015-12-02 23:38:11 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-12-04 23:37:27 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return null;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2015-12-02 23:38:11 +01:00
|
|
|
|
When you "Request Review" of a draft revision, change the button text from "Submit Quietly" to "Publish Revision"
Summary:
See PHI975. Ref T13216. Ref T2543. Previously, see D19204 and PHI433.
When you're acting on a draft revision, we change the button text to "Submit Quietly" as a hint that your actions don't generate notifications yet.
However, this isn't accurate when one of your actions is "Request Review", which causes the revision to publish.
Allow actions to override the submit button text, and make the "Request Review" action change the button text to "Publish Revision".
The alternative change I considered was to remove the word "Quietly" in all cases.
I'm not //thrilled// about how complex this change is to adjust one word, but the various pieces are all fairly clean individually. I'm not sure we'll ever be able to use it for anything else, but I do suspect that the word "Quietly" was the change in D19204 with the largest effect by far (see T10000).
Test Plan:
- Created a draft revision. Saw "Submit Quietly" text.
- Added a "Request Review" action, saw it change to "Publish Revision".
- Reloaded page, saw stack saved and "Publish Revision".
- Removed action, saw "Submit Quietly".
- Repeated on a non-draft revision, button stayed put as "Submit".
- Submitted the various actions, saw them have the desired effects.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13216, T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19810
2018-11-15 14:02:29 +01:00
|
|
|
function redraw() {
|
|
|
|
// If any of the stacked actions specify that they change the label for
|
|
|
|
// the "Submit" button, update the button text. Otherwise, return it to
|
|
|
|
// the default text.
|
|
|
|
var button_text = config.defaultButtonText;
|
|
|
|
for (var k in rows) {
|
|
|
|
var action = action_map[k];
|
|
|
|
if (action.buttonText) {
|
|
|
|
button_text = action.buttonText;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var button_node = JX.DOM.find(form_node, 'button', 'submit-transactions');
|
|
|
|
JX.DOM.setContent(button_node, button_text);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Make some Differential comment actions (like "Accept" and "Reject") conflict with one another
Summary:
Ref T11114. When a user selects "Accept", and then selects "Reject", remove the "Accept". It does not make sense to both accept and reject a revision.
For now, every one of the "actions" conflicts: accept, reject, resign, claim, close, commandeer, etc, etc. I couldn't come up with any combinations that it seems like users are reasonably likely to want to try, and we haven't received combo-action requests in the past that I can recall.
Test Plan:
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Reject". One replaced the other.
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Change Subscribers". Both co-existed happily.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17132
2017-01-02 20:17:27 +01:00
|
|
|
function remove_action(key) {
|
|
|
|
var row = rows[key];
|
|
|
|
if (row) {
|
|
|
|
JX.DOM.remove(row.node);
|
|
|
|
row.option.disabled = false;
|
|
|
|
delete rows[key];
|
2015-12-02 23:38:11 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
When you "Request Review" of a draft revision, change the button text from "Submit Quietly" to "Publish Revision"
Summary:
See PHI975. Ref T13216. Ref T2543. Previously, see D19204 and PHI433.
When you're acting on a draft revision, we change the button text to "Submit Quietly" as a hint that your actions don't generate notifications yet.
However, this isn't accurate when one of your actions is "Request Review", which causes the revision to publish.
Allow actions to override the submit button text, and make the "Request Review" action change the button text to "Publish Revision".
The alternative change I considered was to remove the word "Quietly" in all cases.
I'm not //thrilled// about how complex this change is to adjust one word, but the various pieces are all fairly clean individually. I'm not sure we'll ever be able to use it for anything else, but I do suspect that the word "Quietly" was the change in D19204 with the largest effect by far (see T10000).
Test Plan:
- Created a draft revision. Saw "Submit Quietly" text.
- Added a "Request Review" action, saw it change to "Publish Revision".
- Reloaded page, saw stack saved and "Publish Revision".
- Removed action, saw "Submit Quietly".
- Repeated on a non-draft revision, button stayed put as "Submit".
- Submitted the various actions, saw them have the desired effects.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13216, T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19810
2018-11-15 14:02:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
redraw();
|
2015-12-02 23:38:11 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-04 22:51:18 +01:00
|
|
|
function serialize_actions() {
|
|
|
|
var data = [];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (var k in rows) {
|
|
|
|
data.push({
|
|
|
|
type: k,
|
Make some Differential comment actions (like "Accept" and "Reject") conflict with one another
Summary:
Ref T11114. When a user selects "Accept", and then selects "Reject", remove the "Accept". It does not make sense to both accept and reject a revision.
For now, every one of the "actions" conflicts: accept, reject, resign, claim, close, commandeer, etc, etc. I couldn't come up with any combinations that it seems like users are reasonably likely to want to try, and we haven't received combo-action requests in the past that I can recall.
Test Plan:
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Reject". One replaced the other.
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Change Subscribers". Both co-existed happily.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17132
2017-01-02 20:17:27 +01:00
|
|
|
value: rows[k].control.getValue(),
|
2015-12-15 15:57:32 +01:00
|
|
|
initialValue: action_map[k].initialValue || null
|
2015-12-04 22:51:18 +01:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return JX.JSON.stringify(data);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
function get_data() {
|
|
|
|
var data = JX.DOM.convertFormToDictionary(form_node);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
data.__preview__ = 1;
|
|
|
|
data[input_node.name] = serialize_actions();
|
|
|
|
|
Pass timeline view data to comment previews, restoring Differential comment previews
Summary:
Ref T13222. In D19918, I refactored how timelines get "view data". Today, this is always additional data about which images/changesets/diffs are visible on the current revision/commit/mock, so we can tell if inline comments should be linked to a `#anchor` on the same page (if the inline is rendered there somewhere) or to a `/D123?id=1&vs=2` full link on a different page (if it isn't), but in general this could be any sort of state information about the current page that affects how the timeline should render.
Previously, comment previews did not use any specialized object code and always rendered a "generic" timeline story. This was actually a bug, but none of the code we have today cares about this (since it's all inline related, and inlines render separately) so it never impacted anything.
After the `TimelineEngine` change, the preview renders with Differential-specific code. This is more correct, but we were not passing the preview the "view data" so it broke.
This preview doesn't actually need the view data and we could just make it bail out if it isn't present, but pass it through for consistency and so this works like we'd expect if we do something fancier with view data in the future.
Test Plan: Viewed comment and inline comment previews in Differential, saw old behavior restored.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19943
2019-01-03 01:48:53 +01:00
|
|
|
data.viewData = JX.JSON.stringify(config.viewData);
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-04 22:51:18 +01:00
|
|
|
return data;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-04 23:37:27 +01:00
|
|
|
function restore_draft_actions(drafts) {
|
|
|
|
var draft;
|
|
|
|
var option;
|
|
|
|
var control;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (var ii = 0; ii < drafts.length; ii++) {
|
|
|
|
draft = drafts[ii];
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-15 15:57:32 +01:00
|
|
|
option = find_option(draft);
|
2015-12-04 23:37:27 +01:00
|
|
|
if (!option) {
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
control = add_row(option);
|
|
|
|
}
|
When you "Request Review" of a draft revision, change the button text from "Submit Quietly" to "Publish Revision"
Summary:
See PHI975. Ref T13216. Ref T2543. Previously, see D19204 and PHI433.
When you're acting on a draft revision, we change the button text to "Submit Quietly" as a hint that your actions don't generate notifications yet.
However, this isn't accurate when one of your actions is "Request Review", which causes the revision to publish.
Allow actions to override the submit button text, and make the "Request Review" action change the button text to "Publish Revision".
The alternative change I considered was to remove the word "Quietly" in all cases.
I'm not //thrilled// about how complex this change is to adjust one word, but the various pieces are all fairly clean individually. I'm not sure we'll ever be able to use it for anything else, but I do suspect that the word "Quietly" was the change in D19204 with the largest effect by far (see T10000).
Test Plan:
- Created a draft revision. Saw "Submit Quietly" text.
- Added a "Request Review" action, saw it change to "Publish Revision".
- Reloaded page, saw stack saved and "Publish Revision".
- Removed action, saw "Submit Quietly".
- Repeated on a non-draft revision, button stayed put as "Submit".
- Submitted the various actions, saw them have the desired effects.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13216, T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19810
2018-11-15 14:02:29 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
redraw();
|
2015-12-04 23:37:27 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-04 22:51:18 +01:00
|
|
|
function onresponse(response) {
|
2015-12-22 21:27:51 +01:00
|
|
|
if (JX.Device.getDevice() != 'desktop') {
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-04 22:51:18 +01:00
|
|
|
var panel = JX.$(config.panelID);
|
|
|
|
if (!response.xactions.length) {
|
|
|
|
JX.DOM.hide(panel);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
2017-01-02 19:48:19 +01:00
|
|
|
var preview_root = JX.$(config.timelineID);
|
2015-12-04 22:51:18 +01:00
|
|
|
JX.DOM.setContent(
|
2017-01-02 19:48:19 +01:00
|
|
|
preview_root,
|
2016-12-30 22:37:35 +01:00
|
|
|
[
|
2018-09-10 23:32:55 +02:00
|
|
|
JX.$H(response.header),
|
2016-12-30 22:37:35 +01:00
|
|
|
JX.$H(response.xactions.join('')),
|
|
|
|
JX.$H(response.previewContent)
|
|
|
|
]);
|
2015-12-04 22:51:18 +01:00
|
|
|
JX.DOM.show(panel);
|
2017-01-02 19:48:19 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: Resonses are currently processed before associated behaviors are
|
|
|
|
// registered. We need to defer invoking this event so that any behaviors
|
|
|
|
// accompanying the response are registered.
|
|
|
|
var invoke_preview = function() {
|
|
|
|
JX.Stratcom.invoke(
|
|
|
|
'EditEngine.didCommentPreview',
|
|
|
|
null,
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
rootNode: preview_root
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
setTimeout(invoke_preview, 0);
|
2015-12-04 22:51:18 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Make some Differential comment actions (like "Accept" and "Reject") conflict with one another
Summary:
Ref T11114. When a user selects "Accept", and then selects "Reject", remove the "Accept". It does not make sense to both accept and reject a revision.
For now, every one of the "actions" conflicts: accept, reject, resign, claim, close, commandeer, etc, etc. I couldn't come up with any combinations that it seems like users are reasonably likely to want to try, and we haven't received combo-action requests in the past that I can recall.
Test Plan:
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Reject". One replaced the other.
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Change Subscribers". Both co-existed happily.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17132
2017-01-02 20:17:27 +01:00
|
|
|
function force_preview() {
|
2017-01-19 20:50:37 +01:00
|
|
|
if (!config.showPreview) {
|
Make some Differential comment actions (like "Accept" and "Reject") conflict with one another
Summary:
Ref T11114. When a user selects "Accept", and then selects "Reject", remove the "Accept". It does not make sense to both accept and reject a revision.
For now, every one of the "actions" conflicts: accept, reject, resign, claim, close, commandeer, etc, etc. I couldn't come up with any combinations that it seems like users are reasonably likely to want to try, and we haven't received combo-action requests in the past that I can recall.
Test Plan:
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Reject". One replaced the other.
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Change Subscribers". Both co-existed happily.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17132
2017-01-02 20:17:27 +01:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
new JX.Request(config.actionURI, onresponse)
|
|
|
|
.setData(get_data())
|
|
|
|
.send();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
function add_row(option) {
|
|
|
|
var action = action_map[option.value];
|
|
|
|
if (!action) {
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Remove any conflicting actions. For example, "Accept Revision" conflicts
|
|
|
|
// with "Reject Revision".
|
|
|
|
var conflict_key = action.conflictKey || null;
|
|
|
|
if (conflict_key !== null) {
|
|
|
|
for (var k in action_map) {
|
2017-01-05 04:13:46 +01:00
|
|
|
if (k === action.key) {
|
Make some Differential comment actions (like "Accept" and "Reject") conflict with one another
Summary:
Ref T11114. When a user selects "Accept", and then selects "Reject", remove the "Accept". It does not make sense to both accept and reject a revision.
For now, every one of the "actions" conflicts: accept, reject, resign, claim, close, commandeer, etc, etc. I couldn't come up with any combinations that it seems like users are reasonably likely to want to try, and we haven't received combo-action requests in the past that I can recall.
Test Plan:
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Reject". One replaced the other.
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Change Subscribers". Both co-existed happily.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17132
2017-01-02 20:17:27 +01:00
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (action_map[k].conflictKey !== conflict_key) {
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!(k in rows)) {
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remove_action(k);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
option.disabled = true;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-17 19:53:28 +02:00
|
|
|
var aural = JX.$N('span', {className: 'aural-only'}, action.auralLabel);
|
|
|
|
|
Make some Differential comment actions (like "Accept" and "Reject") conflict with one another
Summary:
Ref T11114. When a user selects "Accept", and then selects "Reject", remove the "Accept". It does not make sense to both accept and reject a revision.
For now, every one of the "actions" conflicts: accept, reject, resign, claim, close, commandeer, etc, etc. I couldn't come up with any combinations that it seems like users are reasonably likely to want to try, and we haven't received combo-action requests in the past that I can recall.
Test Plan:
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Reject". One replaced the other.
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Change Subscribers". Both co-existed happily.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17132
2017-01-02 20:17:27 +01:00
|
|
|
var icon = new JX.PHUIXIconView()
|
|
|
|
.setIcon('fa-times-circle');
|
2018-08-17 19:53:28 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var remove = JX.$N('a', {href: '#'}, [aural, icon.getNode()]);
|
Make some Differential comment actions (like "Accept" and "Reject") conflict with one another
Summary:
Ref T11114. When a user selects "Accept", and then selects "Reject", remove the "Accept". It does not make sense to both accept and reject a revision.
For now, every one of the "actions" conflicts: accept, reject, resign, claim, close, commandeer, etc, etc. I couldn't come up with any combinations that it seems like users are reasonably likely to want to try, and we haven't received combo-action requests in the past that I can recall.
Test Plan:
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Reject". One replaced the other.
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Change Subscribers". Both co-existed happily.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17132
2017-01-02 20:17:27 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var control = new JX.PHUIXFormControl()
|
|
|
|
.setLabel(action.label)
|
|
|
|
.setError(remove)
|
|
|
|
.setControl(action.type, action.spec)
|
|
|
|
.setClass('phui-comment-action');
|
|
|
|
var node = control.getNode();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JX.Stratcom.addSigil(node, 'touchable');
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JX.DOM.listen(node, 'gesture.swipe.end', null, function(e) {
|
|
|
|
var data = e.getData();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (data.direction != 'left') {
|
|
|
|
// Didn't swipe left.
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (data.length <= (JX.Vector.getDim(node).x / 2)) {
|
|
|
|
// Didn't swipe far enough.
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-05 04:13:46 +01:00
|
|
|
remove_action(action.key);
|
Make some Differential comment actions (like "Accept" and "Reject") conflict with one another
Summary:
Ref T11114. When a user selects "Accept", and then selects "Reject", remove the "Accept". It does not make sense to both accept and reject a revision.
For now, every one of the "actions" conflicts: accept, reject, resign, claim, close, commandeer, etc, etc. I couldn't come up with any combinations that it seems like users are reasonably likely to want to try, and we haven't received combo-action requests in the past that I can recall.
Test Plan:
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Reject". One replaced the other.
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Change Subscribers". Both co-existed happily.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17132
2017-01-02 20:17:27 +01:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rows[action.key] = {
|
|
|
|
control: control,
|
|
|
|
node: node,
|
|
|
|
option: option
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JX.DOM.listen(remove, 'click', null, function(e) {
|
|
|
|
e.kill();
|
2017-01-05 04:13:46 +01:00
|
|
|
remove_action(action.key);
|
Make some Differential comment actions (like "Accept" and "Reject") conflict with one another
Summary:
Ref T11114. When a user selects "Accept", and then selects "Reject", remove the "Accept". It does not make sense to both accept and reject a revision.
For now, every one of the "actions" conflicts: accept, reject, resign, claim, close, commandeer, etc, etc. I couldn't come up with any combinations that it seems like users are reasonably likely to want to try, and we haven't received combo-action requests in the past that I can recall.
Test Plan:
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Reject". One replaced the other.
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Change Subscribers". Both co-existed happily.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17132
2017-01-02 20:17:27 +01:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
place_node.parentNode.insertBefore(node, place_node);
|
|
|
|
|
When you "Request Review" of a draft revision, change the button text from "Submit Quietly" to "Publish Revision"
Summary:
See PHI975. Ref T13216. Ref T2543. Previously, see D19204 and PHI433.
When you're acting on a draft revision, we change the button text to "Submit Quietly" as a hint that your actions don't generate notifications yet.
However, this isn't accurate when one of your actions is "Request Review", which causes the revision to publish.
Allow actions to override the submit button text, and make the "Request Review" action change the button text to "Publish Revision".
The alternative change I considered was to remove the word "Quietly" in all cases.
I'm not //thrilled// about how complex this change is to adjust one word, but the various pieces are all fairly clean individually. I'm not sure we'll ever be able to use it for anything else, but I do suspect that the word "Quietly" was the change in D19204 with the largest effect by far (see T10000).
Test Plan:
- Created a draft revision. Saw "Submit Quietly" text.
- Added a "Request Review" action, saw it change to "Publish Revision".
- Reloaded page, saw stack saved and "Publish Revision".
- Removed action, saw "Submit Quietly".
- Repeated on a non-draft revision, button stayed put as "Submit".
- Submitted the various actions, saw them have the desired effects.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13216, T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19810
2018-11-15 14:02:29 +01:00
|
|
|
redraw();
|
|
|
|
|
Make some Differential comment actions (like "Accept" and "Reject") conflict with one another
Summary:
Ref T11114. When a user selects "Accept", and then selects "Reject", remove the "Accept". It does not make sense to both accept and reject a revision.
For now, every one of the "actions" conflicts: accept, reject, resign, claim, close, commandeer, etc, etc. I couldn't come up with any combinations that it seems like users are reasonably likely to want to try, and we haven't received combo-action requests in the past that I can recall.
Test Plan:
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Reject". One replaced the other.
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Change Subscribers". Both co-existed happily.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17132
2017-01-02 20:17:27 +01:00
|
|
|
force_preview();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return control;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-11 11:59:51 +01:00
|
|
|
JX.DOM.listen(form_node, ['submit', 'didSyntheticSubmit'], null, function() {
|
2015-12-04 22:51:18 +01:00
|
|
|
input_node.value = serialize_actions();
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (config.showPreview) {
|
|
|
|
var request = new JX.PhabricatorShapedRequest(
|
|
|
|
config.actionURI,
|
|
|
|
onresponse,
|
|
|
|
get_data);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var trigger = JX.bind(request, request.trigger);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JX.DOM.listen(form_node, 'keydown', null, trigger);
|
|
|
|
|
Make some Differential comment actions (like "Accept" and "Reject") conflict with one another
Summary:
Ref T11114. When a user selects "Accept", and then selects "Reject", remove the "Accept". It does not make sense to both accept and reject a revision.
For now, every one of the "actions" conflicts: accept, reject, resign, claim, close, commandeer, etc, etc. I couldn't come up with any combinations that it seems like users are reasonably likely to want to try, and we haven't received combo-action requests in the past that I can recall.
Test Plan:
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Reject". One replaced the other.
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Change Subscribers". Both co-existed happily.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17132
2017-01-02 20:17:27 +01:00
|
|
|
JX.DOM.listen(form_node, 'shouldRefresh', null, force_preview);
|
2015-12-04 22:51:18 +01:00
|
|
|
request.start();
|
2015-12-22 21:27:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
Clean up some log spam caused by races in VersionedDraft
Summary:
Two minor issues that I caught in the log while fixing Phame permissions:
- We had a JS bug which would cause us to immediately generate two comment previews at the exact same time -- one for loading the page, and one for "switching to desktop". Instead, only generate the "switch to desktop" preview if we really switched to desktop from a different device layout.
- These two requests could end up reading/writing the VersionedDraft table at exactly the same time fairly often (e.g., after a comment submission, the page would load, send two preview requests at exactly the same time, and they'd race fairly reliably for me locally). If we do race, recover from the race.
Test Plan:
Submitted some Phame comments.
- No more error log errors about VersionedDraft keys.
- Saw only one preview request when loading the page instead of two.
Here's the specific stack trace I caught:
```
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.639930 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] [2016-09-05 14:15:33] EXCEPTION: (AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) #1062: Duplicate entry 'PHID-POST-fknnpzjnsdgc3rqobhst-PHID-USER-pr5rjpuilpfserepsd2k-13' for key 'key_object' at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:314]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640801 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] arcanist(head=master, ref.master=9e82ef979e81), corgi(head=master, ref.master=5b9171222bc9), instances(head=stable, ref.master=485bc8128198, ref.stable=2983bc917601), ledger(head=master, ref.master=4da4a24b8779), libcore(), phabricator(head=phame2, ref.master=4b6da9735ba7, ref.phame2=4b6da9735ba7), phutil(head=stable, ref.master=97f05269fdb1, ref.stable=c14343ee620e), services(head=stable, ref.master=1fcb5cdb7582, ref.stable=2d8088a5b4b3)
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640815 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #0 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwCommonException(integer, string) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:348]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640830 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #1 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwQueryCodeException(integer, string) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:289]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640833 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #2 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwQueryException(mysqli) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:185]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640836 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #3 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::executeRawQuery(string) called at [<phutil>/src/xsprintf/queryfx.php:8]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640839 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #4 <#2> queryfx(AphrontMySQLiDatabaseConnection, string, string, string, array, string)
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640841 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #5 <#2> call_user_func_array(string, array) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/AphrontDatabaseConnection.php:42]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640844 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #6 <#2> AphrontDatabaseConnection::query(string, string, string, array, string) called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1261]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640846 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #7 <#2> LiskDAO::insertRecordIntoDatabase(string) called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1106]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640849 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #8 <#2> LiskDAO::insert() called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1075]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640851 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #9 <#2> LiskDAO::save() called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/draft/storage/PhabricatorVersionedDraft.php:65]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640854 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #10 <#2> PhabricatorVersionedDraft::loadOrCreateDraft(string, string, integer) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/editengine/PhabricatorEditEngine.php:1669]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640857 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #11 <#2> PhabricatorEditEngine::buildCommentResponse(PhamePost) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/editengine/PhabricatorEditEngine.php:894]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640859 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #12 <#2> PhabricatorEditEngine::buildResponse() called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/phame/controller/post/PhamePostEditController.php:60]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640862 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #13 <#2> PhamePostEditController::handleRequest(AphrontRequest) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:237]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640865 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #14 phlog(AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/handler/PhabricatorAjaxRequestExceptionHandler.php:27]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640868 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #15 PhabricatorAjaxRequestExceptionHandler::handleRequestException(AphrontRequest, AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:644]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640870 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #16 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::handleException(AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:242]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640873 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #17 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::processRequest(AphrontRequest, PhutilDeferredLog, AphrontPHPHTTPSink, MultimeterControl) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:149]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640879 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #18 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::runHTTPRequest(AphrontPHPHTTPSink) called at [<phabricator>/webroot/index.php:17]
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16494
2016-09-05 21:24:58 +02:00
|
|
|
var old_device = JX.Device.getDevice();
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-22 21:27:51 +01:00
|
|
|
var ondevicechange = function() {
|
Clean up some log spam caused by races in VersionedDraft
Summary:
Two minor issues that I caught in the log while fixing Phame permissions:
- We had a JS bug which would cause us to immediately generate two comment previews at the exact same time -- one for loading the page, and one for "switching to desktop". Instead, only generate the "switch to desktop" preview if we really switched to desktop from a different device layout.
- These two requests could end up reading/writing the VersionedDraft table at exactly the same time fairly often (e.g., after a comment submission, the page would load, send two preview requests at exactly the same time, and they'd race fairly reliably for me locally). If we do race, recover from the race.
Test Plan:
Submitted some Phame comments.
- No more error log errors about VersionedDraft keys.
- Saw only one preview request when loading the page instead of two.
Here's the specific stack trace I caught:
```
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.639930 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] [2016-09-05 14:15:33] EXCEPTION: (AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) #1062: Duplicate entry 'PHID-POST-fknnpzjnsdgc3rqobhst-PHID-USER-pr5rjpuilpfserepsd2k-13' for key 'key_object' at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:314]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640801 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] arcanist(head=master, ref.master=9e82ef979e81), corgi(head=master, ref.master=5b9171222bc9), instances(head=stable, ref.master=485bc8128198, ref.stable=2983bc917601), ledger(head=master, ref.master=4da4a24b8779), libcore(), phabricator(head=phame2, ref.master=4b6da9735ba7, ref.phame2=4b6da9735ba7), phutil(head=stable, ref.master=97f05269fdb1, ref.stable=c14343ee620e), services(head=stable, ref.master=1fcb5cdb7582, ref.stable=2d8088a5b4b3)
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640815 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #0 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwCommonException(integer, string) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:348]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640830 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #1 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwQueryCodeException(integer, string) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:289]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640833 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #2 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwQueryException(mysqli) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:185]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640836 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #3 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::executeRawQuery(string) called at [<phutil>/src/xsprintf/queryfx.php:8]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640839 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #4 <#2> queryfx(AphrontMySQLiDatabaseConnection, string, string, string, array, string)
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640841 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #5 <#2> call_user_func_array(string, array) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/AphrontDatabaseConnection.php:42]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640844 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #6 <#2> AphrontDatabaseConnection::query(string, string, string, array, string) called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1261]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640846 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #7 <#2> LiskDAO::insertRecordIntoDatabase(string) called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1106]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640849 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #8 <#2> LiskDAO::insert() called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1075]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640851 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #9 <#2> LiskDAO::save() called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/draft/storage/PhabricatorVersionedDraft.php:65]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640854 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #10 <#2> PhabricatorVersionedDraft::loadOrCreateDraft(string, string, integer) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/editengine/PhabricatorEditEngine.php:1669]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640857 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #11 <#2> PhabricatorEditEngine::buildCommentResponse(PhamePost) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/editengine/PhabricatorEditEngine.php:894]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640859 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #12 <#2> PhabricatorEditEngine::buildResponse() called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/phame/controller/post/PhamePostEditController.php:60]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640862 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #13 <#2> PhamePostEditController::handleRequest(AphrontRequest) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:237]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640865 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #14 phlog(AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/handler/PhabricatorAjaxRequestExceptionHandler.php:27]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640868 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #15 PhabricatorAjaxRequestExceptionHandler::handleRequestException(AphrontRequest, AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:644]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640870 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #16 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::handleException(AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:242]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640873 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #17 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::processRequest(AphrontRequest, PhutilDeferredLog, AphrontPHPHTTPSink, MultimeterControl) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:149]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640879 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #18 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::runHTTPRequest(AphrontPHPHTTPSink) called at [<phabricator>/webroot/index.php:17]
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16494
2016-09-05 21:24:58 +02:00
|
|
|
var new_device = JX.Device.getDevice();
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-22 21:27:51 +01:00
|
|
|
var panel = JX.$(config.panelID);
|
Clean up some log spam caused by races in VersionedDraft
Summary:
Two minor issues that I caught in the log while fixing Phame permissions:
- We had a JS bug which would cause us to immediately generate two comment previews at the exact same time -- one for loading the page, and one for "switching to desktop". Instead, only generate the "switch to desktop" preview if we really switched to desktop from a different device layout.
- These two requests could end up reading/writing the VersionedDraft table at exactly the same time fairly often (e.g., after a comment submission, the page would load, send two preview requests at exactly the same time, and they'd race fairly reliably for me locally). If we do race, recover from the race.
Test Plan:
Submitted some Phame comments.
- No more error log errors about VersionedDraft keys.
- Saw only one preview request when loading the page instead of two.
Here's the specific stack trace I caught:
```
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.639930 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] [2016-09-05 14:15:33] EXCEPTION: (AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) #1062: Duplicate entry 'PHID-POST-fknnpzjnsdgc3rqobhst-PHID-USER-pr5rjpuilpfserepsd2k-13' for key 'key_object' at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:314]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640801 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] arcanist(head=master, ref.master=9e82ef979e81), corgi(head=master, ref.master=5b9171222bc9), instances(head=stable, ref.master=485bc8128198, ref.stable=2983bc917601), ledger(head=master, ref.master=4da4a24b8779), libcore(), phabricator(head=phame2, ref.master=4b6da9735ba7, ref.phame2=4b6da9735ba7), phutil(head=stable, ref.master=97f05269fdb1, ref.stable=c14343ee620e), services(head=stable, ref.master=1fcb5cdb7582, ref.stable=2d8088a5b4b3)
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640815 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #0 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwCommonException(integer, string) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:348]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640830 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #1 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwQueryCodeException(integer, string) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:289]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640833 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #2 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwQueryException(mysqli) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:185]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640836 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #3 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::executeRawQuery(string) called at [<phutil>/src/xsprintf/queryfx.php:8]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640839 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #4 <#2> queryfx(AphrontMySQLiDatabaseConnection, string, string, string, array, string)
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640841 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #5 <#2> call_user_func_array(string, array) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/AphrontDatabaseConnection.php:42]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640844 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #6 <#2> AphrontDatabaseConnection::query(string, string, string, array, string) called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1261]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640846 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #7 <#2> LiskDAO::insertRecordIntoDatabase(string) called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1106]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640849 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #8 <#2> LiskDAO::insert() called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1075]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640851 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #9 <#2> LiskDAO::save() called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/draft/storage/PhabricatorVersionedDraft.php:65]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640854 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #10 <#2> PhabricatorVersionedDraft::loadOrCreateDraft(string, string, integer) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/editengine/PhabricatorEditEngine.php:1669]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640857 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #11 <#2> PhabricatorEditEngine::buildCommentResponse(PhamePost) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/editengine/PhabricatorEditEngine.php:894]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640859 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #12 <#2> PhabricatorEditEngine::buildResponse() called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/phame/controller/post/PhamePostEditController.php:60]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640862 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #13 <#2> PhamePostEditController::handleRequest(AphrontRequest) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:237]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640865 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #14 phlog(AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/handler/PhabricatorAjaxRequestExceptionHandler.php:27]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640868 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #15 PhabricatorAjaxRequestExceptionHandler::handleRequestException(AphrontRequest, AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:644]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640870 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #16 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::handleException(AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:242]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640873 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #17 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::processRequest(AphrontRequest, PhutilDeferredLog, AphrontPHPHTTPSink, MultimeterControl) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:149]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640879 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #18 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::runHTTPRequest(AphrontPHPHTTPSink) called at [<phabricator>/webroot/index.php:17]
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16494
2016-09-05 21:24:58 +02:00
|
|
|
if (new_device == 'desktop') {
|
2015-12-22 21:27:51 +01:00
|
|
|
request.setRateLimit(500);
|
Clean up some log spam caused by races in VersionedDraft
Summary:
Two minor issues that I caught in the log while fixing Phame permissions:
- We had a JS bug which would cause us to immediately generate two comment previews at the exact same time -- one for loading the page, and one for "switching to desktop". Instead, only generate the "switch to desktop" preview if we really switched to desktop from a different device layout.
- These two requests could end up reading/writing the VersionedDraft table at exactly the same time fairly often (e.g., after a comment submission, the page would load, send two preview requests at exactly the same time, and they'd race fairly reliably for me locally). If we do race, recover from the race.
Test Plan:
Submitted some Phame comments.
- No more error log errors about VersionedDraft keys.
- Saw only one preview request when loading the page instead of two.
Here's the specific stack trace I caught:
```
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.639930 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] [2016-09-05 14:15:33] EXCEPTION: (AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) #1062: Duplicate entry 'PHID-POST-fknnpzjnsdgc3rqobhst-PHID-USER-pr5rjpuilpfserepsd2k-13' for key 'key_object' at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:314]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640801 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] arcanist(head=master, ref.master=9e82ef979e81), corgi(head=master, ref.master=5b9171222bc9), instances(head=stable, ref.master=485bc8128198, ref.stable=2983bc917601), ledger(head=master, ref.master=4da4a24b8779), libcore(), phabricator(head=phame2, ref.master=4b6da9735ba7, ref.phame2=4b6da9735ba7), phutil(head=stable, ref.master=97f05269fdb1, ref.stable=c14343ee620e), services(head=stable, ref.master=1fcb5cdb7582, ref.stable=2d8088a5b4b3)
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640815 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #0 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwCommonException(integer, string) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:348]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640830 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #1 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwQueryCodeException(integer, string) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:289]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640833 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #2 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwQueryException(mysqli) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:185]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640836 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #3 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::executeRawQuery(string) called at [<phutil>/src/xsprintf/queryfx.php:8]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640839 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #4 <#2> queryfx(AphrontMySQLiDatabaseConnection, string, string, string, array, string)
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640841 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #5 <#2> call_user_func_array(string, array) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/AphrontDatabaseConnection.php:42]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640844 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #6 <#2> AphrontDatabaseConnection::query(string, string, string, array, string) called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1261]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640846 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #7 <#2> LiskDAO::insertRecordIntoDatabase(string) called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1106]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640849 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #8 <#2> LiskDAO::insert() called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1075]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640851 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #9 <#2> LiskDAO::save() called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/draft/storage/PhabricatorVersionedDraft.php:65]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640854 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #10 <#2> PhabricatorVersionedDraft::loadOrCreateDraft(string, string, integer) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/editengine/PhabricatorEditEngine.php:1669]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640857 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #11 <#2> PhabricatorEditEngine::buildCommentResponse(PhamePost) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/editengine/PhabricatorEditEngine.php:894]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640859 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #12 <#2> PhabricatorEditEngine::buildResponse() called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/phame/controller/post/PhamePostEditController.php:60]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640862 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #13 <#2> PhamePostEditController::handleRequest(AphrontRequest) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:237]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640865 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #14 phlog(AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/handler/PhabricatorAjaxRequestExceptionHandler.php:27]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640868 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #15 PhabricatorAjaxRequestExceptionHandler::handleRequestException(AphrontRequest, AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:644]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640870 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #16 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::handleException(AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:242]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640873 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #17 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::processRequest(AphrontRequest, PhutilDeferredLog, AphrontPHPHTTPSink, MultimeterControl) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:149]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640879 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #18 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::runHTTPRequest(AphrontPHPHTTPSink) called at [<phabricator>/webroot/index.php:17]
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16494
2016-09-05 21:24:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Force an immediate refresh if we switched from another device type
|
|
|
|
// to desktop.
|
|
|
|
if (old_device != new_device) {
|
Make some Differential comment actions (like "Accept" and "Reject") conflict with one another
Summary:
Ref T11114. When a user selects "Accept", and then selects "Reject", remove the "Accept". It does not make sense to both accept and reject a revision.
For now, every one of the "actions" conflicts: accept, reject, resign, claim, close, commandeer, etc, etc. I couldn't come up with any combinations that it seems like users are reasonably likely to want to try, and we haven't received combo-action requests in the past that I can recall.
Test Plan:
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Reject". One replaced the other.
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Change Subscribers". Both co-existed happily.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17132
2017-01-02 20:17:27 +01:00
|
|
|
force_preview();
|
Clean up some log spam caused by races in VersionedDraft
Summary:
Two minor issues that I caught in the log while fixing Phame permissions:
- We had a JS bug which would cause us to immediately generate two comment previews at the exact same time -- one for loading the page, and one for "switching to desktop". Instead, only generate the "switch to desktop" preview if we really switched to desktop from a different device layout.
- These two requests could end up reading/writing the VersionedDraft table at exactly the same time fairly often (e.g., after a comment submission, the page would load, send two preview requests at exactly the same time, and they'd race fairly reliably for me locally). If we do race, recover from the race.
Test Plan:
Submitted some Phame comments.
- No more error log errors about VersionedDraft keys.
- Saw only one preview request when loading the page instead of two.
Here's the specific stack trace I caught:
```
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.639930 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] [2016-09-05 14:15:33] EXCEPTION: (AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) #1062: Duplicate entry 'PHID-POST-fknnpzjnsdgc3rqobhst-PHID-USER-pr5rjpuilpfserepsd2k-13' for key 'key_object' at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:314]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640801 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] arcanist(head=master, ref.master=9e82ef979e81), corgi(head=master, ref.master=5b9171222bc9), instances(head=stable, ref.master=485bc8128198, ref.stable=2983bc917601), ledger(head=master, ref.master=4da4a24b8779), libcore(), phabricator(head=phame2, ref.master=4b6da9735ba7, ref.phame2=4b6da9735ba7), phutil(head=stable, ref.master=97f05269fdb1, ref.stable=c14343ee620e), services(head=stable, ref.master=1fcb5cdb7582, ref.stable=2d8088a5b4b3)
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640815 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #0 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwCommonException(integer, string) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:348]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640830 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #1 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwQueryCodeException(integer, string) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:289]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640833 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #2 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwQueryException(mysqli) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:185]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640836 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #3 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::executeRawQuery(string) called at [<phutil>/src/xsprintf/queryfx.php:8]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640839 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #4 <#2> queryfx(AphrontMySQLiDatabaseConnection, string, string, string, array, string)
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640841 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #5 <#2> call_user_func_array(string, array) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/AphrontDatabaseConnection.php:42]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640844 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #6 <#2> AphrontDatabaseConnection::query(string, string, string, array, string) called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1261]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640846 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #7 <#2> LiskDAO::insertRecordIntoDatabase(string) called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1106]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640849 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #8 <#2> LiskDAO::insert() called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1075]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640851 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #9 <#2> LiskDAO::save() called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/draft/storage/PhabricatorVersionedDraft.php:65]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640854 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #10 <#2> PhabricatorVersionedDraft::loadOrCreateDraft(string, string, integer) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/editengine/PhabricatorEditEngine.php:1669]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640857 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #11 <#2> PhabricatorEditEngine::buildCommentResponse(PhamePost) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/editengine/PhabricatorEditEngine.php:894]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640859 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #12 <#2> PhabricatorEditEngine::buildResponse() called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/phame/controller/post/PhamePostEditController.php:60]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640862 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #13 <#2> PhamePostEditController::handleRequest(AphrontRequest) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:237]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640865 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #14 phlog(AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/handler/PhabricatorAjaxRequestExceptionHandler.php:27]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640868 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #15 PhabricatorAjaxRequestExceptionHandler::handleRequestException(AphrontRequest, AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:644]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640870 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #16 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::handleException(AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:242]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640873 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #17 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::processRequest(AphrontRequest, PhutilDeferredLog, AphrontPHPHTTPSink, MultimeterControl) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:149]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640879 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #18 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::runHTTPRequest(AphrontPHPHTTPSink) called at [<phabricator>/webroot/index.php:17]
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16494
2016-09-05 21:24:58 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
2015-12-22 21:27:51 +01:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
// On mobile, don't show live previews and only save drafts every
|
|
|
|
// 10 seconds.
|
|
|
|
request.setRateLimit(10000);
|
|
|
|
JX.DOM.hide(panel);
|
|
|
|
}
|
Clean up some log spam caused by races in VersionedDraft
Summary:
Two minor issues that I caught in the log while fixing Phame permissions:
- We had a JS bug which would cause us to immediately generate two comment previews at the exact same time -- one for loading the page, and one for "switching to desktop". Instead, only generate the "switch to desktop" preview if we really switched to desktop from a different device layout.
- These two requests could end up reading/writing the VersionedDraft table at exactly the same time fairly often (e.g., after a comment submission, the page would load, send two preview requests at exactly the same time, and they'd race fairly reliably for me locally). If we do race, recover from the race.
Test Plan:
Submitted some Phame comments.
- No more error log errors about VersionedDraft keys.
- Saw only one preview request when loading the page instead of two.
Here's the specific stack trace I caught:
```
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.639930 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] [2016-09-05 14:15:33] EXCEPTION: (AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) #1062: Duplicate entry 'PHID-POST-fknnpzjnsdgc3rqobhst-PHID-USER-pr5rjpuilpfserepsd2k-13' for key 'key_object' at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:314]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640801 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] arcanist(head=master, ref.master=9e82ef979e81), corgi(head=master, ref.master=5b9171222bc9), instances(head=stable, ref.master=485bc8128198, ref.stable=2983bc917601), ledger(head=master, ref.master=4da4a24b8779), libcore(), phabricator(head=phame2, ref.master=4b6da9735ba7, ref.phame2=4b6da9735ba7), phutil(head=stable, ref.master=97f05269fdb1, ref.stable=c14343ee620e), services(head=stable, ref.master=1fcb5cdb7582, ref.stable=2d8088a5b4b3)
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640815 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #0 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwCommonException(integer, string) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:348]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640830 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #1 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwQueryCodeException(integer, string) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:289]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640833 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #2 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwQueryException(mysqli) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:185]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640836 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #3 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::executeRawQuery(string) called at [<phutil>/src/xsprintf/queryfx.php:8]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640839 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #4 <#2> queryfx(AphrontMySQLiDatabaseConnection, string, string, string, array, string)
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640841 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #5 <#2> call_user_func_array(string, array) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/AphrontDatabaseConnection.php:42]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640844 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #6 <#2> AphrontDatabaseConnection::query(string, string, string, array, string) called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1261]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640846 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #7 <#2> LiskDAO::insertRecordIntoDatabase(string) called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1106]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640849 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #8 <#2> LiskDAO::insert() called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1075]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640851 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #9 <#2> LiskDAO::save() called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/draft/storage/PhabricatorVersionedDraft.php:65]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640854 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #10 <#2> PhabricatorVersionedDraft::loadOrCreateDraft(string, string, integer) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/editengine/PhabricatorEditEngine.php:1669]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640857 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #11 <#2> PhabricatorEditEngine::buildCommentResponse(PhamePost) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/editengine/PhabricatorEditEngine.php:894]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640859 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #12 <#2> PhabricatorEditEngine::buildResponse() called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/phame/controller/post/PhamePostEditController.php:60]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640862 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #13 <#2> PhamePostEditController::handleRequest(AphrontRequest) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:237]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640865 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #14 phlog(AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/handler/PhabricatorAjaxRequestExceptionHandler.php:27]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640868 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #15 PhabricatorAjaxRequestExceptionHandler::handleRequestException(AphrontRequest, AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:644]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640870 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #16 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::handleException(AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:242]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640873 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #17 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::processRequest(AphrontRequest, PhutilDeferredLog, AphrontPHPHTTPSink, MultimeterControl) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:149]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640879 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #18 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::runHTTPRequest(AphrontPHPHTTPSink) called at [<phabricator>/webroot/index.php:17]
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16494
2016-09-05 21:24:58 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
old_device = new_device;
|
2015-12-22 21:27:51 +01:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ondevicechange();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JX.Stratcom.listen('phabricator-device-change', null, ondevicechange);
|
2015-12-04 22:51:18 +01:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-04 23:37:27 +01:00
|
|
|
restore_draft_actions(config.drafts || []);
|
2015-12-22 21:27:51 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2015-12-02 23:38:11 +01:00
|
|
|
});
|