1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-12-01 11:12:42 +01:00
phorge-phorge/src/applications/maniphest/conduit/ConduitAPI_maniphest_Method.php

292 lines
8.9 KiB
PHP
Raw Normal View History

<?php
abstract class ConduitAPI_maniphest_Method extends ConduitAPIMethod {
public function getApplication() {
return PhabricatorApplication::getByClass(
'PhabricatorApplicationManiphest');
}
public function defineErrorTypes() {
return array(
'ERR-INVALID-PARAMETER' => 'Missing or malformed parameter.'
);
}
protected function buildTaskInfoDictionary(ManiphestTask $task) {
$results = $this->buildTaskInfoDictionaries(array($task));
return idx($results, $task->getPHID());
}
protected function getTaskFields($is_new) {
$fields = array();
if (!$is_new) {
$fields += array(
'id' => 'optional int',
'phid' => 'optional int',
);
}
$fields += array(
'title' => $is_new ? 'required string' : 'optional string',
'description' => 'optional string',
'ownerPHID' => 'optional phid',
'ccPHIDs' => 'optional list<phid>',
'priority' => 'optional int',
'projectPHIDs' => 'optional list<phid>',
'auxiliary' => 'optional dict',
);
if (!$is_new) {
$fields += array(
'status' => 'optional int',
'comments' => 'optional string',
);
}
return $fields;
}
protected function applyRequest(
ManiphestTask $task,
ConduitAPIRequest $request,
$is_new) {
$changes = array();
if ($is_new) {
$task->setTitle((string)$request->getValue('title'));
$task->setDescription((string)$request->getValue('description'));
$changes[ManiphestTransaction::TYPE_STATUS] =
ManiphestTaskStatus::getDefaultStatus();
} else {
$comments = $request->getValue('comments');
if (!$is_new && $comments !== null) {
Migrate all Maniphest transaction data to new storage Summary: Ref T2217. This is the risky, hard part; everything after this should be smooth sailing. This is //mostly// clean, except: - The old format would opportunistically combine a comment with some other transaction type if it could. We no longer do that, so: - When migrating, "edit" + "comment" transactions need to be split in two. - When editing now, we should no longer combine these transaction types. - These changes are pretty straightforward and low-impact. - This migration promotes "auxiliary field" data to the new CustomField/StandardField format, so that's not a straight migration either. The formats are very similar, though. Broadly, this takes the same attack that the auth migration did: proxy all the code through to the new storage. `ManiphestTransaction` is now just an API on top of `ManiphestTransactionPro`, which is the new storage format. The two formats are very similar, so this was mostly a straight copy from one table to the other. Test Plan: - Without performing the migration, made a bunch of edits and comments on tasks and verified the new code works correctly. - Droped the test data and performed the migration. - Looked at the resulting data for obvious discrepancies. - Looked at a bunch of tasks and their transaction history. - Used Conduit to pull transaction data. - Edited task description and clicked "View Details" on transaction. - Used batch editor. - Made a bunch more edits. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2217 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7068
2013-09-23 23:25:28 +02:00
$changes[PhabricatorTransactions::TYPE_COMMENT] = null;
}
$title = $request->getValue('title');
if ($title !== null) {
$changes[ManiphestTransaction::TYPE_TITLE] = $title;
}
$desc = $request->getValue('description');
if ($desc !== null) {
$changes[ManiphestTransaction::TYPE_DESCRIPTION] = $desc;
}
$status = $request->getValue('status');
if ($status !== null) {
$valid_statuses = ManiphestTaskStatus::getTaskStatusMap();
if (!isset($valid_statuses[$status])) {
throw id(new ConduitException('ERR-INVALID-PARAMETER'))
->setErrorDescription('Status set to invalid value.');
}
$changes[ManiphestTransaction::TYPE_STATUS] = $status;
}
}
$priority = $request->getValue('priority');
if ($priority !== null) {
$valid_priorities = ManiphestTaskPriority::getTaskPriorityMap();
if (!isset($valid_priorities[$priority])) {
throw id(new ConduitException('ERR-INVALID-PARAMETER'))
->setErrorDescription('Priority set to invalid value.');
}
$changes[ManiphestTransaction::TYPE_PRIORITY] = $priority;
}
$owner_phid = $request->getValue('ownerPHID');
if ($owner_phid !== null) {
$this->validatePHIDList(
array($owner_phid),
PhabricatorPeoplePHIDTypeUser::TYPECONST,
'ownerPHID');
$changes[ManiphestTransaction::TYPE_OWNER] = $owner_phid;
}
$ccs = $request->getValue('ccPHIDs');
if ($ccs !== null) {
$this->validatePHIDList(
$ccs,
PhabricatorPeoplePHIDTypeUser::TYPECONST,
'ccPHIDS');
$changes[ManiphestTransaction::TYPE_CCS] = $ccs;
}
$project_phids = $request->getValue('projectPHIDs');
if ($project_phids !== null) {
$this->validatePHIDList(
$project_phids,
PhabricatorProjectPHIDTypeProject::TYPECONST,
'projectPHIDS');
$changes[ManiphestTransaction::TYPE_PROJECTS] = $project_phids;
}
$template = new ManiphestTransaction();
$transactions = array();
foreach ($changes as $type => $value) {
$transaction = clone $template;
$transaction->setTransactionType($type);
Migrate all Maniphest transaction data to new storage Summary: Ref T2217. This is the risky, hard part; everything after this should be smooth sailing. This is //mostly// clean, except: - The old format would opportunistically combine a comment with some other transaction type if it could. We no longer do that, so: - When migrating, "edit" + "comment" transactions need to be split in two. - When editing now, we should no longer combine these transaction types. - These changes are pretty straightforward and low-impact. - This migration promotes "auxiliary field" data to the new CustomField/StandardField format, so that's not a straight migration either. The formats are very similar, though. Broadly, this takes the same attack that the auth migration did: proxy all the code through to the new storage. `ManiphestTransaction` is now just an API on top of `ManiphestTransactionPro`, which is the new storage format. The two formats are very similar, so this was mostly a straight copy from one table to the other. Test Plan: - Without performing the migration, made a bunch of edits and comments on tasks and verified the new code works correctly. - Droped the test data and performed the migration. - Looked at the resulting data for obvious discrepancies. - Looked at a bunch of tasks and their transaction history. - Used Conduit to pull transaction data. - Edited task description and clicked "View Details" on transaction. - Used batch editor. - Made a bunch more edits. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2217 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7068
2013-09-23 23:25:28 +02:00
if ($type == PhabricatorTransactions::TYPE_COMMENT) {
$transaction->attachComment(
id(new ManiphestTransactionComment())
->setContent($comments));
} else {
$transaction->setNewValue($value);
}
$transactions[] = $transaction;
}
$field_list = PhabricatorCustomField::getObjectFields(
$task,
PhabricatorCustomField::ROLE_EDIT);
$field_list->readFieldsFromStorage($task);
$auxiliary = $request->getValue('auxiliary');
if ($auxiliary) {
foreach ($field_list->getFields() as $key => $field) {
if (!array_key_exists($key, $auxiliary)) {
continue;
}
$transaction = clone $template;
$transaction->setTransactionType(
Migrate all Maniphest transaction data to new storage Summary: Ref T2217. This is the risky, hard part; everything after this should be smooth sailing. This is //mostly// clean, except: - The old format would opportunistically combine a comment with some other transaction type if it could. We no longer do that, so: - When migrating, "edit" + "comment" transactions need to be split in two. - When editing now, we should no longer combine these transaction types. - These changes are pretty straightforward and low-impact. - This migration promotes "auxiliary field" data to the new CustomField/StandardField format, so that's not a straight migration either. The formats are very similar, though. Broadly, this takes the same attack that the auth migration did: proxy all the code through to the new storage. `ManiphestTransaction` is now just an API on top of `ManiphestTransactionPro`, which is the new storage format. The two formats are very similar, so this was mostly a straight copy from one table to the other. Test Plan: - Without performing the migration, made a bunch of edits and comments on tasks and verified the new code works correctly. - Droped the test data and performed the migration. - Looked at the resulting data for obvious discrepancies. - Looked at a bunch of tasks and their transaction history. - Used Conduit to pull transaction data. - Edited task description and clicked "View Details" on transaction. - Used batch editor. - Made a bunch more edits. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran Maniphest Tasks: T2217 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7068
2013-09-23 23:25:28 +02:00
PhabricatorTransactions::TYPE_CUSTOMFIELD);
$transaction->setMetadataValue('customfield:key', $key);
$transaction->setOldValue(
$field->getOldValueForApplicationTransactions());
$transaction->setNewValue($auxiliary[$key]);
$transactions[] = $transaction;
}
}
if (!$transactions) {
return;
}
$event = new PhabricatorEvent(
PhabricatorEventType::TYPE_MANIPHEST_WILLEDITTASK,
array(
'task' => $task,
'new' => $is_new,
'transactions' => $transactions,
));
$event->setUser($request->getUser());
$event->setConduitRequest($request);
PhutilEventEngine::dispatchEvent($event);
$task = $event->getValue('task');
$transactions = $event->getValue('transactions');
$content_source = PhabricatorContentSource::newForSource(
PhabricatorContentSource::SOURCE_CONDUIT,
array());
$editor = id(new ManiphestTransactionEditor())
->setActor($request->getUser())
->setContentSource($content_source)
->setContinueOnNoEffect(true);
if (!$is_new) {
$editor->setContinueOnMissingFields(true);
}
$editor->applyTransactions($task, $transactions);
$event = new PhabricatorEvent(
PhabricatorEventType::TYPE_MANIPHEST_DIDEDITTASK,
array(
'task' => $task,
'new' => $is_new,
'transactions' => $transactions,
));
$event->setUser($request->getUser());
$event->setConduitRequest($request);
PhutilEventEngine::dispatchEvent($event);
}
protected function buildTaskInfoDictionaries(array $tasks) {
assert_instances_of($tasks, 'ManiphestTask');
if (!$tasks) {
return array();
}
$task_phids = mpull($tasks, 'getPHID');
$all_deps = id(new PhabricatorEdgeQuery())
->withSourcePHIDs($task_phids)
->withEdgeTypes(array(PhabricatorEdgeConfig::TYPE_TASK_DEPENDS_ON_TASK));
$all_deps->execute();
$result = array();
foreach ($tasks as $task) {
// TODO: Batch this get as CustomField gets cleaned up.
$field_list = PhabricatorCustomField::getObjectFields(
$task,
PhabricatorCustomField::ROLE_EDIT);
$field_list->readFieldsFromStorage($task);
$auxiliary = mpull(
$field_list->getFields(),
'getValueForStorage',
'getFieldKey');
$task_deps = $all_deps->getDestinationPHIDs(
array($task->getPHID()),
array(PhabricatorEdgeConfig::TYPE_TASK_DEPENDS_ON_TASK));
$result[$task->getPHID()] = array(
'id' => $task->getID(),
'phid' => $task->getPHID(),
'authorPHID' => $task->getAuthorPHID(),
'ownerPHID' => $task->getOwnerPHID(),
'ccPHIDs' => $task->getCCPHIDs(),
'status' => $task->getStatus(),
'statusName' => ManiphestTaskStatus::getTaskStatusName(
$task->getStatus()),
'isClosed' => $task->isClosed(),
'priority' => ManiphestTaskPriority::getTaskPriorityName(
$task->getPriority()),
'priorityColor' => ManiphestTaskPriority::getTaskPriorityColor(
$task->getPriority()),
'title' => $task->getTitle(),
'description' => $task->getDescription(),
'projectPHIDs' => $task->getProjectPHIDs(),
'uri' => PhabricatorEnv::getProductionURI('/T'.$task->getID()),
'auxiliary' => $auxiliary,
'objectName' => 'T'.$task->getID(),
'dateCreated' => $task->getDateCreated(),
'dateModified' => $task->getDateModified(),
'dependsOnTaskPHIDs' => $task_deps,
);
}
return $result;
}
/**
* Note this is a temporary stop gap since its easy to make malformed Tasks.
* Long-term, the values set in @{method:defineParamTypes} will be used to
* validate data implicitly within the larger Conduit application.
*
* TODO -- remove this in favor of generalized Conduit hotness
*/
private function validatePHIDList(array $phid_list, $phid_type, $field) {
$phid_groups = phid_group_by_type($phid_list);
unset($phid_groups[$phid_type]);
if (!empty($phid_groups)) {
throw id(new ConduitException('ERR-INVALID-PARAMETER'))
->setErrorDescription(
'One or more PHIDs were invalid for '.$field.'.');
}
return true;
}
}