Summary: Remove the `*TransactionType` classes and define the constants in the corresponding `*Transaction` class instead.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13188
Summary:
Ref T6367. Removes `multiplexMail()`!
We can't pass a single body into a function which splits it anymore: we need to split recipients first, then build bodies for each recipient list. This lets us build separate bodies for each recipient's individual translation/access levels.
The new logic does this:
- First, split recipients into groups called "targets".
- Each target corresponds to one actual mail we're going to build.
- Each target has a viewer (whose translation / access levels will be used to generate the mail).
- Each target has a to/cc list (the users who we'll ultimately send the mail to).
- For each target, build a custom mail body based on the viewer's access levels and settings (language prefs not actually implemented).
- Then, deliver the mail.
Test Plan:
- Read new config help.
Then did a bunch of testing, primarily with `bin/mail list-outbound` and `bin/mail show-outbound` (to review generated mail), `bin/phd debug taskmaster` (to run daemons freely) and `bin/worker execute --id <id>` (to repeatedly test a specific piece of code after identifying an issue).
With `one-mail-per-recipient` on (default):
- Sent mail to multiple users.
- Verified mail showed up in `mail list-outbound`.
- Examined mail with `mail show-outbound`.
- Added a project that a subscriber could not see.
- Verified it was not present in `X-Phabricator-Projects`.
- Verified it was rendered as "Restricted Project" for the non-permissioned viewer.
- Added a subscriber, then changed the object policy so they could not see it and sent mail.
- Verified I received mail but the other user did not.
- Enabled public replies and verified mail generated with public addresses.
- Disabld public replies and verified mail generated with private addresses.
With `one-mail-per-recipient` off:
- Verified that one mail is sent to all recipients.
- Verified users who can not see the object are still filtered.
- Verified that partially-visible projects are completely visible in the mail (this violates policies, as documented, as the best available compromise).
- Enabled public replies and verified the mail generated with "Reply To".
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: carlsverre, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6367
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13131
Summary:
Ref T7199. Ref T7712. This improves the file rules for email:
- Embed visible images as thumbnails.
- Put all other file types in a nice list.
This "fixes" an issue caused by the opposite of the problem described in T7712 -- files being dropped if the default ruleset is too restrictive. T7712 is the real solution here, but use a half-measure for now.
Test Plan:
- Sent mail with two non-images and two images.
- Got a nice list of non-images and embeds of images.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7712, T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12235
Summary:
Ref T7199. Although this is useful for discovery, it's un-useful enough that we already have an option to disable it, and most applications do not provide any meaningful instructions.
Throwing it away makes it easier to move forward and lets us get rid of a config option.
This is becoming a more advanced/power-user feature anyway, and the new syntax will be significantly more complex and hard to explain with a one-liner. I'm currently thinking that I'll maybe make the "help" menu a dropdown and give it some options like:
+---+
| O |
+---+---------------------+
| Maniphest Documentation |
| Maniphest Email Actions |
+-------------------------+
Then you click the "Email Actions" thing and get a runtime-derived list of available options. Not sure if I'll actually build that, but I think we can fairly throw the in-mail instructions away even if we don't go in that specific direction.
Test Plan: Grepped for `replyHandlerInstructions`, got no hits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12229
Summary:
Ref T7439. Fixes T7438. This is only used in email right now.
Remain backward compatible.
Test Plan:
- Sent a message, saw a "Z" reply address.
- Checked the PHIDType.
- Grepped for `"E"` and `'E'`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7439, T7438
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11956
Summary: Modernize remaining edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: Browsed around and performed various actions include subscribing, unsubscribing and watching.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11116
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rP, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.
Test Plan: Eyeballed it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9431
Summary:
In some applications, using `{V2}` syntax to embed a vote throws. The chain of causality looks like this:
- We try to render a `phabricator_form()`.
- This requires a CSRF token.
- We look for a CSRF token on the user.
- It's an omnipotent user with no token, so everything fails.
To resolve this, make sure we always pass the real user in.
Test Plan:
- Lots of `grep`.
- Made a Differential comment with `{V2}`.
- Made a Diffusion comment with `{V2}`.
- Made a Maniphest comment with `{V2}`.
- Replied to a Conpherence thread with `{V2}`.
- Created a Conpherence thread with `{V2}`.
- Used Conduit to update a Conpherence thread with `{V2}`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, lkassianik
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8849
Summary: This "Reply to comment, etc., etc." section got lost along the way at some point. Restore it for transaction mail.
Test Plan: Received mail from Maniphest with reply instructions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8700
Summary:
also try to centralize some of the command parsing logic. note that differential is still an exception here. it uses a whitelist-style regex. i think long-term we should have this for every app but changing it seemed too big for this diff.
Fixes T3937.
Test Plan:
echo '!assign btrahan' | ./bin/mail receive-test --as xerxes --to T22 ; echo '!claim' | ./bin/mail receive-test --as xerxes --to T22
unit tests passed, though my new one is silly
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3937
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7307
Summary: Mostly applies a new call spacing rule; also a few things that have slipped through via pull requests and such
Test Plan: `find src/ -type f -name '*.php' | xargs -n16 arc lint --output summary --apply-patches`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5002
Summary: I'm not super happy with the prettiness of the code, but I wasn't able to come up with a good way to clean it up. Happy for suggestions.
Test Plan: sent message to btrahan@phabricator.dev from gmail. Copied raw email and piped it to mail_handler.php -- it created a conpherence! Repeated but sent to btrahan and xerxes and noted that the conpherence was created for both users
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2431
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4854
Summary: unifies the code and presentation between adding files via email and web. Also makes it possible to "attach" the same file multiple times, either by just talking about it in the different messages or multiple times in the same message.
Test Plan: sent message with attachment - it worked! sent a message referencing previous attachment - it work! sent a message with the same attachment in it like 12 times - it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2399
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4679
Summary: you have to attach files and participants before you can start editing the conpherenece
Test Plan: push it live and try again
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2399
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4674
Summary: Added a reply handler. A few problems -- first, I can't seem to get this to actually send me email so I haven't been able to reply (which I would have done by generating a reply, then copying the raw email into scripts/mail_handler.php). Second, the subject is often terrible on these emails -- unless the conpherence is named its something gross like "E4:" Third, on create I am noticing an error on array_combine() which I think is related to the need to write array_combine_not_broken or what have you I saw go by... (PhabricatorTransactionEditor does array_combine(xaction->getOldValue(), xaction->getOldValue()) and complains that the arrays are empty)
Test Plan: noted that /mail/ said mails were being sent
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2399
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4656
