1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-25 00:02:41 +01:00
Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
38e31375ea Improve UX for customizing EditEngine forms a little bit
Summary:
Ref T10004. Tweaks some of the UX a little to be more intuitive/inviting?

  - Button says "Configure Form" instead of "Actions".
  - Root list is less "developer-ey" and more "explain what this is for-ey".

Test Plan:
{F1028928}

{F1028929}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T10004

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14808
2015-12-17 08:40:00 -08:00
epriestley
81ae9f8fb6 Clean up an issue with meta-editing of edit engines
Summary:
Ref T9908. These meta-edit-engines are used to generate the main editengine UIs, but they're also editable.

Fix an exception when trying to edit the meta editengine.

Test Plan: Edited editengineconfiguration editengine.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T9908

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14783
2015-12-14 15:26:03 -08:00
epriestley
82e67e6bb9 Clean up some EditEngine meta-policies
Summary:
Ref T9908. Simplify some of the policies here:

  - If you can edit an application (currently, always "Administrators"), you can view and edit all of its forms.
  - You must be able to edit an application to create new forms.
  - Improve some error messages.
  - Get about halfway through letting users reorder forms in the "Create" menu if they want to sort by something weird since it'll need schema changes and I can do them all in one go here.

Test Plan:
  - Tried to create and edit forms as an unprivileged user.
  - Created and edited forms as an administrator.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T9908

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14700
2015-12-07 15:40:31 -08:00
epriestley
37893ba2e6 Allow EditEngine configurations to be disabled and marked as "Default"
Summary:
Ref T9132.

Let configurations be enabled/disabled. This doesn't do much right now.

Let configurations be marked as default entries in the application "Create" menu. This makes them show up in the application in a dropdown, so you can replace the default form and/or provide several forms.

In Maniphest, we'll do this to provide a menu something like this:

  - New Bug Report
  - New Feature Request
  - ADVANCED TASK CREATION!!11~ (only available for Community members)

Test Plan: {F1005679}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T9132

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14584
2015-11-29 08:27:26 -08:00
epriestley
9aee90f8c1 Allow form configurations to retitle and reorder forms and add preambles
Summary:
Ref T9132. This just makes edited forms do //something//, albeit not anything very useful yet.

You can now edit a form and:

  - Retitle it;
  - add a preamble (instructions on top of the form); and
  - reorder the form's fields.

Test Plan:
{F974632}

{F974633}

{F974634}

{F974635}

{F974636}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Subscribers: hach-que

Maniphest Tasks: T9132

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14503
2015-11-22 15:12:57 -08:00
epriestley
12dd9ec3ff Have EditEngine API methods provide the correct application to Conduit
Summary:
Fixes T9799. Currently, if you can't see an application like Paste, we fatal when trying to generate a result for `conduit.query`, because the new EditEngine-based `paste.edit` method doesn't "know" that it's a "Paste" method.

Straighten this out, and use policies and queries a little more correctly/consistently.

Test Plan:
  - Called `conduit.query` as a user who does not have permission to use Paste.
  - Before change: fatal.
  - After change: results, excluding "paste.*" methods.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Subscribers: cburroughs

Maniphest Tasks: T9799

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14492
2015-11-16 10:02:50 -08:00
epriestley
0398097498 Allow ApplicationEditor forms to be reconfigured
Summary:
Ref T9132. This diff doesn't do anything interesting, it just lays the groundwork for more interesting future diffs.

Broadly, the idea here is to let you create multiple views of each edit form. For example, we might create several different "Create Task" forms, like:

  - "New Bug Report"
  - "New Feature Request"

These would be views of the "Create Task" form, but with various adjustments:

  - A form might have additional instructions ("how to file a good bug report").
  - A form might have prefilled values for some fields (like particular projects, subscribers, or policies).
  - A form might have some fields locked (so they can not be edited) or hidden.
  - A form might have a different field order.
  - A form might have a limited visibility policy, so only some users can access it.

This diff adds a new storage object (`EditEngineConfiguration`) to keep track of all those customizations and represent "a form which has been configured to look and work a certain way".

This doesn't let these configurations do anything useful/interesting, and you can't access them directly yet, it's just all the boring plumbing to enable more interesting behavior in the future.

Test Plan:
ApplicationEditor forms now let you manage available forms and edit the current form:

{F959025}

There's a new (bare bones) list of all available engines:

{F959030}

And if you jump into an engine, you can see all the forms for it:

{F959038}

The actual form configurations have standard detail/edit pages. The edit pages are themselves driven by ApplicationEditor, of course, so you can edit the form for editing forms.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T9132

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14453
2015-11-10 10:24:40 -08:00