1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-12-03 04:02:43 +01:00
Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chad Little
cdcfbb69a0 CSS Tweaks to reviewers status list
Summary: Updates the review status list to align better inside property lists. Alsu uses the default colors a bit more. This removes an overflow hidden on the value side, but that shouldnt cause any issues, given it has plenty of space.

Test Plan: tested differential and audit, highlighted and not.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7441
2013-10-29 20:26:41 -07:00
epriestley
8aa8ef49da Provide an "Add blocking reviewer..." Herald action
Summary: Ref T1279. These reviewers don't actually create a logical block yet (that is, revisions still transition to "accepted" even in their presence), but this handles everything except that.

Test Plan: Added Herald rules and updated revisions; see screenshots.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1279

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7244
2013-10-06 17:09:24 -07:00
epriestley
3d3d3b6d80 Move determination of reviewer authority into DifferentialRevisionQuery
Summary:
Ref T1279. We currently determine reviewers at display time, but this is bad for several reasons:

  - It puts queries very close to the display layer.
  - We have to query for each revision if we want to figure out authority for several.
  - We need to figure it out in several places, so we'll end up with copies of this logic.
  - The logic isn't trivial (exceptions for the viewer, exceptions to that rule for install configuration).
  - We already do this "figure it out when we need it" stuff in Diffusion for audits and it's really bad: we have half-working copies of the logic spread all over the place.

Instead, put it in the Query. Callers query for it and get the data attached to the reviewer objects.

Test Plan:
  - Looked at some revisions, verified the correct lines were highlighted.
    - Looked at a revision I created and verified that projects I was a member of were not highlighted.
      - With self-accept enabled, these //are// highlighted.
    - Looked at a revision I did not create and verified that projects I was a member of were highlighted.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1279

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7241
2013-10-06 17:08:14 -07:00
epriestley
c80a4f51c1 Highlight reviews the viewer is responsible for in Differential
Summary: Ref T1279. No logical changes, but cosmetically highlight stuff you have authority for, like we do in Diffusion.

Test Plan: See screenshot.

Reviewers: chad, btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1279

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7237
2013-10-05 14:10:52 -07:00
epriestley
2d733f88a1 Split users apart from projects/packages in reviewer and audit UIs
Summary: Ref T1279. Show separate sections for "Reviewers" and "Project Reviewers" (Differential) and for "Auditors" and "Package/Project Auditors" (Diffusion/Audit).

Test Plan:
  - Looked at a commit. Saw separation.
  - Looked at a revision. Saw separation.

Reviewers: chad, btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1279

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7233
2013-10-05 14:10:49 -07:00