1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-12-05 13:16:14 +01:00
Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
1a4e5931f8 Remove push to IRC from "readme.md" too
Summary: Brings this in line with other support docs and pushes users toward the modern stuff.

Test Plan: Read documentation.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14329
2015-10-24 18:39:16 -07:00
Chad Little
ec70ff7944 Marginal improvements to README
Summary: Remove Facebook copy, add in team conversing.

Test Plan: Read carefully

Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12016
2015-03-08 11:29:06 -07:00
Bob Trahan
dca27279cc README update - rely on bug reporting doc and add section about community chat
Summary: Saw D11693 and I thought these changes on top might make the README even better? Open for discussion. I like our bug reporting doc a lot so I don't mind funneling users through it and not mentioning the bug reporting link directly in the readme. This notably forces github users to read a bit before they report issues to us for the first time. That said, I think the community chat can be really helpful at no cost to us so why not upsell it? This could fail if people start asking for say epriestley directly and / or the overall chatter is time consuming, but seemed worth tossing out at least.

Test Plan: read the text, asking opinions of cohorts

Reviewers: chad, epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11694
2015-02-05 09:48:11 -08:00
Chad Little
e46871be56 Slightly better README formatting
Summary: Easier to read

Test Plan: Use a few different preview engines

Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11693
2015-02-05 08:45:46 -08:00
Chad Little
4d6aea7ce8 Add a more complete README for GitHub
Summary: Not sure this is entirely correct or needed as a separate file, but I think GitHub's README could use some additonal information

Test Plan: Used a Markdown editor

Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11542
2015-01-28 12:49:36 -08:00