1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-12-01 03:02:43 +01:00
Commit graph

6 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
592591e715 Clean up various pieces of dead/obsolete Differential code
Summary:
Ref T2222.

  - Removes `DifferentialTasksAttacher`, which has had no callsites for a very long time.
  - Moves `differential.getrevisioncomments` off `DifferentialCommentQuery`.
  - Moves Releeph churn field off `DifferentialCommentQuery`.
  - Removes dead code in `DifferentialRevisionViewController`.
  - Removes `DifferentialException` (no references).
  - Removes `DifferentialRevision->loadComments()` (no callsites).
  - Removes `DifferentialRevision->loadReviewedBy()` (all callsites updated).
  - Removes `DifferentialCommentQuery` (all callsites updated).

Test Plan: Mostly a lot of `grep`.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2222

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8476
2014-03-11 13:02:19 -07:00
epriestley
f25cce1e69 Remove DifferentialCommentEditor and DifferentialCommentMail
Summary: Ref T2222. These no longer have any callsites. Also got rid of a little bit of other code which also no longer has callsites.

Test Plan: `grep`

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2222

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8443
2014-03-07 17:44:19 -08:00
vrana
ef85f49adc Delete license headers from files
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).

We are removing the headers for these reasons:

- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.

This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).

Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.

Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T2035

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
2012-11-05 11:16:51 -08:00
vrana
6cc196a2e5 Move files in Phabricator one level up
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.

NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.

Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.

Auditors: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T1103
2012-06-01 12:32:44 -07:00
epriestley
09c8af4de0 Upgrade phabricator to libphutil v2
Summary: Mechanical changes from D2588. No "Class.php" moves yet.

Test Plan: See D2588.

Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, jungejason

Reviewed By: vrana

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1103

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2591
2012-05-30 14:26:29 -07:00
epriestley
d8bbf55959 Improve behavior when user submits a no-op action in Differential
Summary:
See T730 and the slightly-less-pretty version of this in D1398.

When a user takes an action in Differential that has no effect (for instance,
accepting an already-accepted revision), prompt them:

  Action Has No Effect

  You can not accept this revision because it has already been accepted.

  Do you want to post the feedback anyway, as a normal comment?

                        [Cancel] [Post as Comment]

If they have no comment text, the dialog only says "Cancel".

I think this is probably the best way to balance all the concerns here -- it
might occasionally be a little annoying, but that should be rare, and it should
never be confusing (the current workflow is extremely confusing).

This also fixes the issue where you can add all sorts of CCs who are already
part of the revision, either explicitly or via mentions.

Test Plan:
Posted some has-effect and has-no-effect comments, made different
choices in the dialog, everything seems to work OK?

Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, jungejason

Reviewed By: vrana

CC: aran, vrana

Maniphest Tasks: T730

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1403
2012-01-15 03:44:09 -08:00