Summary: Fixes T5510. This purely reduces false positives from HackerOne: we currently rotate CSRF tokens, but do not bind them explicitly to specific sessions. Doing so has no real security benefit and may make some session rotation changes more difficult down the line, but researchers routinely report it. Just conform to expectations since the expected behavior isn't bad and this is less work for us than dealing with false positives.
Test Plan:
- With two browsers logged in under the same user, verified I was issued different CSRF tokens.
- Verified the token from one browser did not work in the other browser's session.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5510
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10136
Summary:
Fixes T5509. Currently, existing sessions live on even if you change your password.
Over the course of the program, we've recieved a lot of HackerOne reports that sessions do not terminate when users change their passwords. I hold that this isn't a security vulnerability: users can explicitly manage sessions, and this is more general and more powerful than tying session termination to password resets. In particular, many installs do not use a password provider at all (and no researcher has reported this in a general, application-aware way that discusses multiple authentication providers).
That said, dealing with these false positives is vaguely time consuming, and the "expected" behavior isn't bad for users, so just align behavior with researcher expectations: when passwords are changed, providers are removed, or multi-factor authentication is added to an account, terminate all other active login sessions.
Test Plan:
- Using two browsers, established multiple login sessions.
- In one browser, changed account password. Saw session terminate and logout in the second browser.
- In one browser, removed an authentication provider. Saw session terminate and logout in the second browser.
- In one browser, added MFA. Saw session terminate and logout in the second browser.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5509
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10135
Summary:
Fixes T5506. Depends on D10133. When users remove an email address or change their primary email address, invalidate any outstanding password reset links.
This is a very small security risk, but the current behavior is somewhat surprising, and an attacker could sit on a reset link for up to 24 hours and then use it to re-compromise an account.
Test Plan:
- Changed primary address and removed addreses.
- Verified these actions invalidated outstanding one-time login temporary tokens.
- Tried to use revoked reset links.
- Revoked normally from new UI panel.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5506
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10134
Summary:
Ref T5506. This makes it easier to understand and manage temporary tokens.
Eventually this could be more user-friendly, since it's relatively difficult to understand what this screen means. My short-term goal is just to make the next change easier to implement and test.
The next diff will close a small security weakness: if you change your email address, password reset links which were sent to the old address are still valid. Although an attacker would need substantial access to exploit this (essentially, it would just make it easier for them to re-compromise an already compromised account), it's a bit surprising. In the next diff, email address changes will invalidate outstanding password reset links.
Test Plan:
- Viewed outstanding tokens.
- Added tokens to the list by making "Forgot your password?" requests.
- Revoked tokens individually.
- Revoked all tokens.
- Tried to use a revoked token.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5506
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10133
Summary:
Ref T4896. Now that we have a transaction editor, we can delete a giant block of hacks.
I believe this also resolves the commit/task attachment issues @joshuaspence and @mbishopim3 mentioned.
Test Plan: Attached and detached commits and tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence, mbishopim3
Reviewed By: mbishopim3
Subscribers: mbishopim3, epriestley, joshuaspence
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10138
Summary: Ref T4896. I got this logic slightly wrong when porting it over: we always want to write this relationship, to allow members of a project with an audit request against a commit to resign and get it out of their queue.
Test Plan:
- Resigned from a commit with an existing relationship.
- Resigned from a commit with no existing relationship, saw one added.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence, mbishopim3
Reviewed By: mbishopim3
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10137
Summary:
Ref T4589. We don't recognize task descriptions as remarkup blocks, so `{F...}` references in them do not get attached to the objects, and thus no policy exemption is created.
Recognize them, which activates `{F...}` and `@mentions`.
We probably have a few more of these in other applications, but it's not a big deal to clean them up as they arise.
Test Plan: Uploaded a file to a task in the description field, saw it attach and get a policy exemption.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4589
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10139
Summary:
Ref T4589. When you look at a file, we load attached objects in order to run the "you can see this if you can see any attached object" policy check.
However, right now the subquery inherits the "throw on filter" flag from the parent query. This inheritance makes sense in other cases[1], but because this is an "ANY" rule it does not make sense here. In practice, it means that if the file is attached to several objects, and any of them gets filtered, you can not see the file.
Instead, explicitly drop the flag for this subquery.
[1] Sort of. It doesn't produce wrong results in other cases, but now that I think about it might produce a less-tailored error than it could. I'll look into this the next time I'm poking around.
Test Plan:
- Viewed an "All Users" file attached to a private Mock.
- Prior to this patch, I incorrectly received an exception when the Mock was loaded. This is wrong; I should be able to see the file because the policy is "All Users".
- After the patch, I can correctly view the file, just not the associated mock.
{F127074}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: 20after4, aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4589
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8498
Summary:
Fixes T4589. This implements much better policy behavior for files that aligns with user expectations.
Currently, all files have permissive visibility.
The new behavior is:
- Files uploaded via drag-and-drop to the home page or file upload page get permissive visibility, for ease of quickly sharing things like screenshots.
- Files uploaded via the manual file upload control get permissive visibility by default, but the user can select the policy they want at upload time in an explicit/obvious way.
- Files uploaded via drag-and-drop anywhere else (e.g., comments or Pholio) get restricted visibility (only the uploader).
- When the user applies a transaction to the object which uses the file, we attach the file to the object and punch a hole through the policies: if you can see the object, you can see the file.
- This rule requires things to use ApplicationTransactions, which is why this took so long to fix.
- The "attach stuff to the object" code has been in place for a long time and works correctly.
I'll land D8498 after this lands, too.
Test Plan:
- Uploaded via global homepage upload and file drag-and-drop upload, saw permissive visibility.
- Uploaded via comment area, saw restricted visibility.
- After commenting, verified links were established and the file became visible to users who could see the attached object.
- Verified Pholio (which is a bit of a special case) correctly attaches images.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4589
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10131
Summary: Ref T4589. Depends on D10129. In addition to letting users change the visibility policy for files, also allow them to choose a policy explicitly when a file is uploaded.
Test Plan: Uploaded several files using the plain old uploader, saw appropriate visibility policies applied.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4589
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10130
Summary: Ref T4589. Allow users to adjust visibility settings on files explicitly. This makes it easier to understand and manage upcoming changes in T4589.
Test Plan: Changed the view policy for a file several times.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4589
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10129
Summary: Ref T4896. This converts the last "CommentEditor" to a transaction editor and removes a large part of the old code.
Test Plan:
- Added comments.
- Accepted / added auditors.
- Added inline comments.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10128
Summary: Ref T4896. Invoke the new editor directly instead of in a roundabout way when handling Audit email.
Test Plan: Used `bin/mail receive-test` to simulate mail, saw comment post with proper content source.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10127
Summary: Ref T4896. Use the new transaction-oriented `PhabricatorAuditEditor` directly instead of invoking it via the old editor.
Test Plan: Used Conduit to add a comment, use silent mode, and accept a commit.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10126
Summary: Ref T4896. Applies these actions using new transaction stuff.
Test Plan:
- Accepted and raised concern with my own commit, verifying the special project/package behavior.
- Accepted and raised concern with another author's commit, verifying the authority-over-packages/projects behavior.
- Accepted a commit I was not affiliated wiht, verifying the "join as an auditor" behavior.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10125
Summary: Ref T4896. Hook these up with new stuff.
Test Plan:
- Closed an audit.
- Resigned from an audit.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10124
Summary:
Ref T4896. Move the write for "Add Auditors" inside the new Editor.
There are no longer any readers or writers for metadata, so remove the calls for it.
Test Plan: Added auditors from the web UI.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10123
Summary: Ref T4659. Because we JOIN, tasks with no value are filtered out. Instead, LEFT JOIN.
Test Plan: Issued an "Order by" and got all applicable tasks. Adjusted values and saw order change.
Reviewers: btrahan, hach-que
Reviewed By: hach-que
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4659
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10119
Summary:
Resolves T4659. This implements support for sorting tasks by custom fields.
Some of this feels hacky in the way it's hooked up to the Maniphest search engine and task query.
Test Plan: Queryed on a custom date field, with a small page size, and moved back and forth through the result set.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4659
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10106
Summary: This class was renamed in D9991 but the filename is incorrect.
Test Plan: Eyeball it
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10118
Summary: Ref T4896. Instead of using custom stuff, use standard stuff.
Test Plan: Viewed a bunch of feed stories and published some over the Asana bridge.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10114
Summary: Ref T4896. Replace custom stuff with standard stuff.
Test Plan:
- Sent a bunch of email and it all looked sensible/correct.
- Made sure to test inlines, specifically, as they're a bit tricky.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10112
Summary: Ref T4896.
Test Plan: Made an unusual comment, then found it by searching.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: btrahan, joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10110
Summary:
Ref T4896. Replaces more custom stuff with standard stuff. In particular:
- No more fake proxy writes;
- no more fake detection of `@mentions`.
For now, the old code still applies most of the effects and handles feed and email.
Test Plan:
- Added comments.
- Added comments with inline comments.
- Added just inline comments.
- Added comments with Conduit.
- Previewed comments.
- Added CCs explicitly and with `@mentions`.
- Added auditors.
- Accepted a commit.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10109
Summary:
Ref T4896. Currently, subscriptions to commits are stored as auditors with a special "CC" type.
Instead, use normal subscriptions storage, reads and writes.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration and verified data still looked good.
- Viewed commits in UI and saw "subscribers".
- Saw "Automatically Subscribed", clicked Subscribe/Unsubscribe on a non-authored commit, saw subscriptions update.
- Pushed a commit through Herald rules and saw them trigger subscriptions and auditors.
- Used "Add CCs".
- Added CCs with mentions.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: btrahan, joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10103
Summary: This class was renamed in D9991, but the filename is incorrect.
Test Plan: Eyeball it
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10117
Summary:
Fixes T5666. When we have a pretty link right now it can conflict with form data; e.g. if you have 'statuses=open' in the URI and then uncheck status = open in the UI, you will still get the open status in the next search.
To fix this, set the form action explicitly to lose all the get parameter junk.
Test Plan: tried the test case in T5666 / this description and it no longer failed...!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5666
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10115
Summary:
pre-patch "Mark All Read" marks *all* unread notifications as read. This is a race condition in that the user is looking at some set of notiifcations and that set may update such that the newest notifications aren't shown. An example might be if sitting on the notifications page or having the menu open while a new notification comes in... Note re-opening the menu would show the latest notifications.
This patch makes it so "Mark All Read" links only marks the notifications currently loaded (and older.) Fixes T5764.
Additionally, if there is nothing to "mark read" the button / link "Mark All Read" will have a disabled style and yield a dialog saying "nothing to mark as read".
Test Plan: carefully tracked ?chronoKey populating correctly in various links. Verified query constructed properly too.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5764
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10113
Summary: we were missing an e.kill(). Fixes T5754.
Test Plan: looked at a file and selected different tabs - pre-patch vertical position lost and post patch vertical position preserved!
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5754
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10111
Summary: Fixes T5188; see task for discussion.
Test Plan: made error condition occur with Firefox and was able to dismiss it by clicking 2x - once to focus window and then once to actually click in the window. Did this multiple times in a row with no errors.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5188
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10102
Summary: $this->id wasn't being set in this case so just set it explicitly after we finish loading the project. Fixes T5763.
Test Plan: links were broken no longer!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5763
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10108
Summary:
Ref T5366. Currently, enabling `notification.debug` fails to produce any messages unless developer mode is also enabled.
There's no reason we need to disable JX.log in production, and the byte size of the method is very small. Always provide a real JX.log implementation.
Test Plan: Saw notification debugging without needing to enable developer mode.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence, hach-que
Reviewed By: hach-que
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5366
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10104
Summary: This moves the status property of the build to the bottom of the property list so that it matches the build targets.
Test Plan: Viewed a build, saw the status in the right position.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10096
Summary: This shows the status icon and color along side the build status on the build view controller.
Test Plan: Viewed a build, saw the icon appear.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10094
Summary:
Ref T1049. This uses tabs on build targets to hide the configuration details and variables by default, instead promoting the target name, it's status and a description of the build step. The description is a new field on each build step.
The primary advantage of having a description on build steps is that DevOps can configure appropriate description information (including any troubleshooting information for build failures) on build steps, and developers who have builds fail against their code review can then look at this information.
Test Plan: Viewed a build plan and saw the appropriate information.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10093
Summary: Ref T1049. This hides the build target messages area if there are no messages for the target. Since most of the time a build target won't recieve any messages, this area is confusing because it's always empty.
Test Plan: Viewed a build, saw the empty build target message areas disappear.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10092
Summary: We've received feedback that the "core - exception" is incredibly confusing, to the point where developers see this and write off the build failure as a Phabricator error that is unrelated to their changes.
Test Plan: Ran a build with a `exit 1` run step, didn't see the "core - exception" appear.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10090
Summary: This fix is wrong - should be load and not get - but moreover this is actually correctly set as the reply handler is instantiated inside the DifferentialRevisionMailReceiver correctly; $this->getExclude was correct. Ref T5185.
Test Plan: this shall stop the fatal in production.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5185
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10101
Summary: Fixes T5663. Said task kind of stalled out and maybe @chad wanted to take a different approach, but this works? Also, I think fixing any new bugs that may emerge with more reasonable css scoping seems like a reasonable path forward.
Test Plan: inline display of status icon looked correct in differential
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley, chad, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10084
Summary: This makes input artifacts imply the appropriate build step dependencies in the build plan. That is, if you use a host artifact in a build step, it will then implicitly depend on the 'Lease Host' step.
Test Plan: Viewed the build plan with the artifacts, saw the dependencies. Ran a build, saw everything execute in the correct order.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10089
Summary: Ref T5185. By code inspection, I am pretty sure before this patch it was doing a set of a get on itself which does nothing. Now, being careful not to break Facebook we get the proper exclusion phids. I am pretty sure the folks in T5185 are experiencing this in Differential only.
Test Plan: Get some folks on T5185 to play with this
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5185
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10087
Summary:
Depends on D9806. This implements the build simulator, which is used to calculate the order of build steps in the plan editor. This includes a migration script to convert existing plans from sequential based to dependency based, and then drops the sequence column.
Because build plans are now dependency based, the grippable and re-order behaviour has been removed.
Test Plan: Tested the migration, saw the dependencies appear correctly.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9847
Summary: Fixes T5751. Currently, we incorrectly overwrite `$xactions`.
Test Plan: Closed a blocking task, got an email about the correct transaction set ("closed task; added comment") instead of an overwritten transaction set ("closed blocking task").
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5751
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10088
Summary: This was causing a crash according to a conversation with @rfergu in IRC. The issue is that if `$images_to_show` is empty, then `$image` never gets set, and it attempts to call `getID` on a null / unset variable.
Test Plan: @rfergu confirmed this fixed the crash.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, rfergu, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10073
Summary: forgot to do this today; its like i'm rusty or something. :/
Test Plan: na
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10086
