Summary: Ref T8441. Ref T7715. I'm primarily clearing callers to `saveQueryOrder()` so I can get rid of it.
Test Plan: Used all Macro search features.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7715, T8441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13194
Summary:
Ref T8441. Ref T7715. Automatically generate a modern "Order" control in ApplicationSearch for engines which fully support SearchField.
Notably, this allows the standard "Order" control to automatically support custom field orders. We do this in Maniphest today, but in an ad-hoc way.
Test Plan: Performed order-by queries in Almanac (Services), Pholio, Files, People, Projects, and Paste.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7715, T8441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13193
Summary:
Ref T8441. Ref T7715. For modern Query classes, automatically make subscriber queries and SearchField integrations work.
In particular, we can just drive this query with EdgeLogic and don't need to do anything specific on these Query classes beyond making sure they're implemented in a way that picks up all of the EdgeLogic clauses.
Test Plan:
- Searched for subscribers in Pholio, Files, Paste, and Projects.
- Searched for all other fields in Projects to check that Query changes are OK.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7715, T8441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13191
Summary:
Ref T8441. Ref T7715. This is mostly about getting SearchFields + CustomFields working.
(This includes a couple of SearchFields which aren't used quite yet.)
Test Plan:
- Used all search controls.
- Defined custom fields and searched for them.
- Created an old saved search which searches on custom fields on master, switched to this patch, search worked exaclty as written.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7715, T8441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13189
Summary: Ref T8441. Does what it says, provided other conditions (like using the new SearchField stuff) are fulfilled.
Test Plan:
{F473836}
{F473837}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13171
Summary: Ref T8441. Ref T7715. Let SearchFields do some value massaging before buiding queries so we don't have to work as hard in each SearchEngine. Particularly, they can handle evaluateTokens() from Tokenizers.
Test Plan: Paste automatically gained access to `viewer()`, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7715, T8441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13170
Summary:
Ref T8441. Ref T7715. Add a layer of indirection to fields in search engines. This will allow us to:
- Simplify SearchEngine code, which has collected a lot of duplication around expressing what is effectively field types.
- Automatically add fields like "Spaces" and "Projects" (primary driver for T8441).
- Reorder or hide fields (not sure if we really want to do this, but it seems plausible, and this will let us play around with it, at least).
- Drive Conduit Query methods via SearchEngines, so the same code specifies both the search UI and the `application.query` endpoint (primary driver in T7715).
Test Plan:
- Searched for stuff in Paste, everything behaved exaclty like it used to (except that I removed the "no language" checkbox, which seemed like fluff from a bygone era).
- Searched for stuff in other applications, saw no changes.
- Hit date field errors.
- Used query strings to specify values.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7715, T8441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13169
