Summary:
See support email. There's nothing tricky here, we were just missing a check. The different parts of this got built at different times so I think this was simply overlooked.
Also add a redundant check just to future-proof this and be on the safe side.
Test Plan: Used `bin/phortune invoice` to charge a pact subscription. After deleting the card, the charge failed with an appropriate error.
Reviewers: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19020
Summary:
Depends on D19009. Ref T13053. For "Must Encrypt" mail, we must currently strip the "Thread-Topic" header because it sometimes contains sensitive information about the object.
I don't actually know if this header is useful or anyting uses it. My understanding is that it's an Outlook/Exchange thing, but we also implement "Thread-Index" which I think is what Outlook/Exchange actually look at. This header may have done something before we implemented "Thread-Index", or maybe never done anything. Or maybe older versions of Excel/Outlook did something with it and newer versions don't, or do less. So it's possible that an even better fix here would be to simply remove this, but I wasn't able to convince myself of that after Googling for 10 minutes and I don't think it's worth hours of installing Exchange/Outlook to figure out. Instead, I'm just trying to simplify our handling of this header for now, and maybe some day we'll learn more about Exchange/Outlook and can remove it.
In a number of cases we already use the object monogram or PHID as a "Thread-Topic" without users ever complaining, so I think that if this header is useful it probably isn't shown to users, or isn't shown very often (e.g., only in a specific "conversation" sub-view?). Just use the object PHID (which should be unique and stable) as a thread-topic, everywhere, automatically.
Then allow this header through for "Must Encrypt" mail.
Test Plan: Processed some local mail, saw object PHIDs for "Thread-Topic" headers.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13053
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19012
Summary: Noticed a couple of typos in the docs, and then things got out of hand.
Test Plan:
- Stared at the words until my eyes watered and the letters began to swim on the screen.
- Consulted a dictionary.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18693
Summary: Fixes T12958. Adds a success message when card is added, also switches to use radio buttons for clarity. Updated redirect uri for deleting methods as well.
Test Plan:
Add cards, remove cards.
{F5091084}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12958
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18381
Summary:
Ref T12681. We need this to update the "paid until" window on support pacts.
(Instance billing doesn't use this because everything just checks if you have unpaid invoices, nothing actually happens when you pay them.)
Test Plan: See D18187.
Reviewers: chad, amckinley
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12681
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18188
Summary: Ran across a few straglers. Convert to the correct color.
Test Plan: grep for profile-image-button, check profile image selection page
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18096
Summary: Try to dis-ambiguate various button types and colors. Moves `simple` to `phui-button-simple` and moves colors to `button-color`.
Test Plan: Grep for buttons still inline, UIExamples, PHUIX, Herald, and Email Preferences.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18077
Summary: This says "Edit Subscription" but the page only lets you update the payment method for autopay. I think this is confusing users. I tried to find the best language here, but suggest something else if you prefer.
Test Plan: Review language on sample subscription page.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12451
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17944
Summary: Ref T12685. Checks merchant capabilities at the edit engine level
Test Plan: Test with and without admin level permissions. Get restricted access if I cheat. Still able to create with admin.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12685
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17852
Summary:
Ref T12451. This is a GREAT comment (A++) but we only need one copy of it.
This uses a pattern similar to Projects, which is a little weird but works well enough.
Test Plan:
- Viewed all four tabs of an account.
- Viewed a page with a bad account ID which 404'd properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12451
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17694
Summary: Ref T12451. This code is the same as the other code.
Test Plan: Went through the default-account case with this code, worked the same as the other code.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12451
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17693
Summary:
Ref T12451. Ref T12484. This should deal with all the `+` / `-` / `=` cases correctly, I think.
Also makes sure that members are real users, not commits or tokens or whatever. And expands the creation test case to make some other basic sanity checks.
Test Plan:
- Went through implicit first-time creation flow.
- Went through explicit second-time creation flow.
- Unit test now passes.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12484, T12451
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17692
Summary:
Ref T12451. Ref T12484. I think D17657 fixed this, but caused the bug in D17690. The fix for that causes this bug again.
Put a unit test on it. This test currently fails; I'll correct the bug in the next change.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit`, saw a failure.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12484, T12451
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17691
Summary:
Ref T12451. When you explicitly created a second or third account or whatever, you wouldn't be added as a member.
(The editor sees that you're "already a member", so it doesn't add you.)
Test Plan:
- Go to `/phortune/`.
- Click "Switch Accounts".
- Click "Create Account".
- Create an account.
- Before patch: unable to view it since you don't get added as a member.
- After patch: account created with you as member.
- Also created an accont with multiple members.
- Tried to create an account with no members.
- Tried to create an account with just someone else as a member.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12451
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17690
Summary: Ref T12451. `$this->getAccount()` may not return an account.
Test Plan:
- Visit `/phortune/X/`, where `X` is the ID of an account you don't have permission to view.
- Before patch: fatal.
- After patch: normal policy exception page.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12451
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17689
Summary: Primarily, this splits individual sections of the single account page into a more managable and robust sidenav for subscriptions, billing, and managers. The functionality on the subpages is light, but I expect to build on then in coming diffs. This also starts building out a more effective "status" area on the lead page.
Test Plan:
- Load up default account
- Make some edits
- Click on each of the new navigation items
- Verify links to "see all" work
- Test overdue and no payment states for status
{F4337317}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17589
Summary: There is currently a validation error triggered if you initialize a new account without a member set. I think this is the correct fix, but let me know.
Test Plan: truncate phortune_account database, navigate to phortune, see account automatically created to "Default Account".
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17657
Summary: Builds out Phortune Merchant pages to have a sidenav and sub-pages for further expansion. For now this links Orders and Subscriptions to the query engine pages, but could be split out to be more informative (unpaid, upcoming, etc).
Test Plan:
Create a new merchant, edit some information, add a manager in new UI, edit logo, click through to subscriptions, orders.
{F4883013}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17655
Summary: This updates the backend of PhortuneAccount to use EditEngine and Modular Transactions and updates language to "account manager" for clarity of role.
Test Plan:
- Wiped `phortune_account` table
- Visit Phortune, see new account automatically created.
- Edit name and managers
- Try to set no name or remove myself as a manager, get error messages
- Visit `/phortune/` and create another new account
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17585
Summary: Modernize PhortuneMerchant for Modular Transactions. Also changed the language of "Members" to "Managers", which I think fits better given the power/capability.
Test Plan:
- Create a new Merchant
- Test not filling in a name, see error
- Test removing myself, see error
- Edit an existing Merchant
- Add new managers
- Test removing myself, see error
- Replace Picture
- Update various fields, contact info, email, footer
- Verify transactions are now nice and pretty
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17584
Summary: Minor, uses 'user-circle' for account, and merchant logo for merchants in lists.
Test Plan: View the landing page, see updated logos and icons.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17586
Summary: Move individual controller files into cooresponding folders. Makes it easier to locate sections and expand without clutter. Also made "chargelist" part of account since it's tied to having an account specifically.
Test Plan: Vist charges, merchants, subscription, accounts, and other pages. No errors from file move.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17587
Summary: Fixes T12224. This brings "Autopay" on the View controller into line with how it works on the Edit controller.
Test Plan:
- Viewed subscriptions with no autopay, valid autopay, and deleted autopay.
{F2750725}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12224
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17334
Summary:
Currently, when a payment method is invalid we still render the full name and let you save the form without making changes. This can be confusing.
Instead:
- Render "<Deleted Payment Method>", literally.
- Render an error immediately.
- Prevent the form from being saved without changing the method.
Test Plan: {F1955487}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16935
Summary:
This has been replaced by `PolicyCodex` after D16830. Also:
- Rebuild Celerity map to fix grumpy unit test.
- Fix one issue on the policy exception workflow to accommodate the new code.
Test Plan:
- `arc unit --everything`
- Viewed policy explanations.
- Viewed policy errors.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: hach-que, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16831
Summary:
When Phortune merchant accounts are created via mechanisms other than the web UI (for example, by Phacility unit tests) this validation check may fail.
Transactions are validated even if no transactions of the given type are being applied, to allow the editor to raise errors like "Name is required!".
If there's no TYPE_INVOICEEMAIL transaction, we'll get called with empty `$xactions` and fail on `strlen($new_email)` because the variable is never defined.
As a secondary issue, if contactInfo, invoiceEmail or invoiceFooter are not provided the record will fail to insert (none of these are nullable).
Test Plan: Ran Phacility unit tests, got a clean result for new instance creation.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16798
Summary: Makes a more complete PDF looking invoice form for printing in Phortune.
Test Plan: Make an invoice, click print view, print.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16762
Summary:
This fixes the permissions issue with D16750, which is actually not really a permissions issue, exactly.
This is the only place anywhere that we use a tokenizer field //and// give it a default value which is not the same as the object value (when creating a merchant, we default it to the viewer).
In other cases (like Maniphest) we avoid this because you can edit the form to have defaults, which would collide with whatever default we provide. Some disucssion in T10222.
Since we aren't going to let you edit these forms for the forseeable future, this behavior is reasonable here though.
However, it triggered a sort-of-bug related to conflict detection for these fields (see T4768). These fields actually have two values: a hidden "initial" value, and a visible edited value.
When you submit the form, we compute your edit by comparing the edited value to the initial value, then applying adds/removes, instead of just saying "set value equal to new value". This prevents issues when two people edit at the same time and both make changes to the field.
In this case, the initial value was being set to the display value, so the field would say "Value: [(alincoln x)]" but internally have that as the intitial value, too. When you submitted, it would see "you didn't change anything", and thus not add any members.
So the viewer wouldn't actually be added as a member, then the policy check would correctly fail.
Note that there are still some policy issues here (you can remove yourself from a Merchant and lock yourself out) but they fall into the realm of stuff discussed in D16677.
Test Plan: Created a merchant account with D16750 applied.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16764
Summary: Converts PhortuneMerchant to EditEngine.
Test Plan: Edits existing merchants fine, same issue as Conpherence when making new ones with permissions.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16750
Summary: Is a logo. For merchants.
Test Plan: Set a new logo, remove it. See on list.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T7607
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16751
Summary:
A live instance hit the scenario described in the comment, where an out-of-date user was being selected as the actor.
Since they were no longer an account member, they could not see the payment method and autopay was failing.
Instead, select a relatively arbitrary user who is a current, valid, non-disabled member.
Test Plan: Ran subscriptions with `bin/worker execute ...`, saw it select a valid actor.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16757
Summary: Part of making this look/feel/be more professional is having decent receipts for billing, including contact information (whatever we want to put in there). I'm not using this anywhere at the moment, but will.
Test Plan: Add Contact Info, see Contact Info. Also, why is Remarkup not rendering with line breaks? Seems to be a OneOff thing... anywho... bears!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T7607
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14125
Summary: Fixes T11556. This was just missing an `implements ...`, which became necessary at some point even for classes that don't use much of the beahvior (ModularTransactions?).
Test Plan: Created a new test payment provider on a Phortune merchant.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11556
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16471
Summary: Previously we collapsed all table search results, but the new UI doesn't need it. Remove unused methods and fix CSS.
Test Plan: Legalpad Signatures, Phortune Accounts.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16469
Summary: Going to render these all normal case instead of all caps, and bump up the font size. Should be more consistent. Yellow if you green anything orange.
Test Plan: grep, lint
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15645
Summary:
Ref T10537. For Nuance, I want to introduce new sources (like "GitHub" or "GitHub via Nuance" or something) but this needs to modularize eventually.
Split ContentSource apart so applications can add new content sources.
Test Plan:
This change has huge surface area, so I'll hold it until post-release. I think it's fairly safe (and if it does break anything, the breaks should be fatals, not anything subtle or difficult to fix), there's just no reason not to hold it for a few hours.
- Viewed new module page.
- Grepped for all removed functions/constants.
- Viewed some transactions.
- Hovered over timestamps to get content source details.
- Added a comment via Conduit.
- Added a comment via web.
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade --namespace XXXXX --no-quickstart -f` to re-run all historic migrations.
- Generated some objects with `bin/lipsum`.
- Ran a bulk job on some tasks.
- Ran unit tests.
{F1190182}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15521
Summary: This URI is currently a little whack.
Test Plan:
- With MFA, clicked "Edit Subscription" on a subscription.
- Clicked "Cancel".
- Before: Sent to `/phortune/phortune/edit/...`, a 404.
- After: Properly returned to subscription detail page.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15514
Summary: Moves everything I could find in Phortune to new UI layouts.
Test Plan: Tested every page I could get two, unclear how to test subscriptions.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15513
Summary: This is failing locally for me, set to getViewer and pull up cart.
Test Plan: View cart with a description.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15509
Summary: Moves all the one off object calls to PHUIRemarkupView, adds a "Document" call as well (future plans).
Test Plan: Visited most pages I could get access to, but may want extra careful eyes on this diff.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15281
Summary: Mostly for consistency, we're not using other forms of icons and this makes all classes that use an icon call it in the same way.
Test Plan: tested uiexamples, lots of other random pages.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15125
Summary:
The old treatment was fairly technical. Give this UI a more human-friendly flow:
- Use language "remove" instead of "disable". We keep the record that the card existed around for auditing/historical purposes, but it is no longer a valid payment method going forward and can not be undone. I think this aligns with user expectation and actual behavior better than "disable".
- Only show active methods on the profile screen.
Test Plan: {F1057153}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14973
Summary:
Ref T10004. After D14804, we get this behavior by default and no longer need to set it explicitly.
(If some endpoint did eventually need to set it explicitly, it could just change what it passes to `setHref()`, but I believe we currently have no such endpoints and do not foresee ever having any.)
Test Plan:
- As a logged out user, clicked various links in Differential, Maniphest, Files, etc., always got redirected to a sensible place after login.
- Grepped for `setObjectURI()`, `getObjectURI()` (there are a few remaining callsites, but to a different method with the same name in Doorkeeper).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14805
