Summary:
Ref T1191.
- Removes ponder comment table. This was migrated a very long time ago.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for removed table.
- Saw ~100 fewer issues in web UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10582
Summary:
Ref T1191. Notes:
- Drops the project affiliation table. This is a very old membership table which was migrated to edges.
- Drops the subproject table. This is a very old table for a removed feature.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for dropped tables.
- Saw ~100 fewer setup issues.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10581
Summary:
Ref T1191. Some notes here:
- Drops the old LDAP and OAuth info tables. These were migrated to the ExternalAccount table a very long time ago.
- Separates surplus/missing keys from other types of surplus/missing things. In the long run, my plan is to have only two notice levels:
- Error: something we can't fix (missing database, table, or column; overlong key).
- Warning: something we can fix (surplus anything, missing key, bad column type, bad key columns, bad uniqueness, bad collation or charset).
- For now, retaining three levels is helpful in generating all the expected scheamta.
Test Plan:
- Saw ~200 issues resolve, leaving ~1,300.
- Grepped for removed tables.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10580
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- This drops two tables.
- Both tables were migrated to transactions a very long time ago and no longer have readers or writers.
Test Plan: Saw ~150 fewer warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10576
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- Adds support for custom fields.
- Adds support for partial indexes (indexes on a prefix of a column).
- Drops old auxiliary storage table: this was moved to custom field storage about a year ago.
- Drops old project table: this was moved to edges about two months ago.
Test Plan:
- Viewed web UI, saw fewer issues.
- Used `grep` to verify no readers/writers for storage or project table.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10526
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- There was a varchar(50) column. I changed it to `text64`, since this length is unusual.
- There was an int(3) column. I changed it to `int32`, since this length is unusual.
Test Plan: Ran migrations, saw warnings disappear from config tool.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10524
Summary: Ref T1191. This was migrated to transactions a very long time ago.
Test Plan: Ran migration, grepped, left comments in Slowvote.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10523
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- Fixes T6096. We've migrated away from this table in T4896. The data is now in the transaction table. There have been no reads or writes to this table for some time and I haven't seen any issues from users.
- Fixes T6097. Same deal as above. The data is now in the transaction comment table.
- Fixes T6100. This cache is safe to wipe out, since it's purely read-through. Wiping it will make the migration faster. The column type change fixes storage of PHP serialized objects in a text column.
Test Plan:
- Ran migrations.
- Observed some yellow go blue on the Database Status screen.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6096, T6100, T6097, T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10520
Summary:
Fixes T5603. Puts the toggling of locking membership into the editor so we get exceptions and all that.
I think the dialogue when you try to leave a project that is locked could be a little better maybe? Right now it just says "You can't leave" and "The membership is locked" more or less; should I surface a link to the policy stuff there too?
Test Plan:
- made a project, toggled the "lock" setting, observed stickiness and good transactions being made
- locked a project and tried to leave as a non-editor - got a dialogue letting me know i couldn't
- locked a project and tried to leave as an editor - left successfully
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10508
Summary:
Fixes T6084. Changes:
- Rename `phabricator.show-beta-applications` to `phabricator.show-prototypes`, to reinforce that these include early-development applications.
- Migrate the config setting.
- Add an explicit "no support" banner to the config page.
- Rename "Beta" to "Prototype" in the UI.
- Use "bomb" icon instead of "half star" icon.
- Document prototype applications in more detail.
- Explicitly document that we do not support these applications.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Resolved "obsolete config" issue.
- Viewed config setting.
- Browsed prototypes in Applications app.
- Viewed documentation.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T6084
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10493
Summary:
Ref T5835. This is still completely made up (no payment integration), but you can "back" an initiative, type a number in the box, and generate a database row. You can then seach for backers and things you've backed and such.
Notable changes:
- Renamed "FundBacking" to "FundBacker". The former name was sort of because you can back things multiple times, but stuff like `$backings` was just too weird.
- I think that's it?
Test Plan:
- Backed an initiative.
- Viewed that I became a backer.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5835
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10486
Summary:
Ref T5835. This is all pretty boilerplate, and does not interact with Phortune at all yet.
You can create "Initiatives", which have a title and description, and support most of the expected infrastructure (policies, transactions, mentions, edges, appsearch, remakrup, etc).
Only notable decisions:
- Initiatives have an explicit owner. I think it's good to have a single clearly-responsible user behind an initiative.
- I think that's it?
Test Plan:
- Created an initiative.
- Edited an initiative.
- Changed application policy defaults.
- Searched for initiatives.
- Subscribed to an initiative.
- Opened/closed an initiative.
- Used `I123` and `{I123}` in remarkup.
- Destroyed an initiative.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5835
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10481
Summary:
Fixes T6013. Old image macros/memes never had the file edge written.
We also never wrote file edges for audio.
Finally, the meme controller didn't allow public access.
Write edges for images and audio, perform a migration to populate the historic ones, and make the Editor keep them up to date going forward.
Test Plan:
- Updated image, saw new image attach and old image detach.
- Updated audio, saw new audio attach and old audio detach.
- Ran migration.
- Viewed memes as a logged-out user.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6013
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10411
Summary: Fixes T4881.
Test Plan: made a config change, saw the issue, restarted daemons and it went away
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4881
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10339
Summary:
Ref T5932. Ref T5936. This implements build generations in Harbormaster, which provides the infrastructure required to both show users the previous states of restarted builds and to allow users to forcefully abort builds (and their targets).
You can view previous generations of a build by adding `?g=<n>` to the URI, but this isn't exposed in the UI anywhere yet.
Test Plan: Ran a build plan with a Sleep step in it. Reconfigured it for various sleep times and viewed previous generations of the build after restarting it.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5932, T5936
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10321
Summary: Resolves T5895. This reduces page load times significantly when looking at builds.
Test Plan: Viewed a build, saw the page load a lot faster.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5895
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10286
Summary: Ref T5884. We migrated with "canCDN" and then had live writes with "cancdn". Move everything to "canCDN" for consistency.
Test Plan: Ran migration, verified DB only has "canCDN" afterward.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5884
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10273
Summary: Ref T5819. Implements basic icon and color filtering for projects.
Test Plan: {F189350}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10230
Summary:
Ref T1049. This keeps track of how long a build target takes to execute in Harbormaster and displays it in the build view page. I'm not sure whether "Started" is really that useful once the target has completed?
Also, I change the name of the time taken depending on whether or not the target has completed; if it's still in progress it's called "Elapsed" and if it's completed then it's "Duration". The primary reason for this is that "Duration" sounds like post tense, whereas "Elapsed" is current tense. I'm not sure whether this is okay or not?
Test Plan: Ran a Sleep build step and saw the target dates / times appear correctly.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: talshiri, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5824, T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10174
Summary:
Fixes T5840. Some time ago I incorrectly believed that `latin1_bin` collation was synonymous with "binary". It is not, and does not permit UTF8 characters outside of BMP, among other sequences.
These two tables currently have `LONGTEXT` columns which should be `LONGBLOB`. The table design is explicilty intended to accommodate invalid/unreasonably long ref names, but the collation prevents this from working properly.
After T1191, we'll have a general system for resolving this, but a user hit an issue yesterday (T5840) with a brnach name containing Chinese characters.
Test Plan:
- Tried emoji inserts into both tables, was rebuffed.
- Ran migration.
- Performed emoji inserts into both tables.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5840
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10217
Summary:
Fixes T5677.
- Instead of using `sequence == 0` to mean "this is the backlog column", flag the column explicitly.
- Migrate existing sequence 0 columns to have the flag.
- Add the flag when initializing or copying a board.
- Remove special backlog logic when reordering columns.
Test Plan:
- Migrated columns, viewed some boards, they looked identical.
- Reordered the backlog column a bunch of times (first, last, middle, dragged other stuff around).
- Added tasks to a project, saw them show up in the reordered backlog.
- Initialized a new board and saw a backlog column show up.
- Copied an existing board and saw the backlog column come over.
- Tried to hide a backlog column.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10189
Summary:
Fixes T5476. Using edges to store which objects are on which board columns ends up being pretty awkward. In particular, it makes T4807 very difficult to implement.
Introduce a dedicated `BoardColumnPosition` storage.
This doesn't affect ordering rules (T4807) yet: boards are still arranged by priority. We just read which tasks are on which columns out of a new table.
Test Plan:
- Migrated data, then viewed some boards. Saw exactly the same data.
- Dragged tasks from column to column.
- Created a task directly into a column.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5476
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10160
Summary:
Ref T4896. Currently, subscriptions to commits are stored as auditors with a special "CC" type.
Instead, use normal subscriptions storage, reads and writes.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration and verified data still looked good.
- Viewed commits in UI and saw "subscribers".
- Saw "Automatically Subscribed", clicked Subscribe/Unsubscribe on a non-authored commit, saw subscriptions update.
- Pushed a commit through Herald rules and saw them trigger subscriptions and auditors.
- Used "Add CCs".
- Added CCs with mentions.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: btrahan, joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10103
Summary:
Ref T1049. This uses tabs on build targets to hide the configuration details and variables by default, instead promoting the target name, it's status and a description of the build step. The description is a new field on each build step.
The primary advantage of having a description on build steps is that DevOps can configure appropriate description information (including any troubleshooting information for build failures) on build steps, and developers who have builds fail against their code review can then look at this information.
Test Plan: Viewed a build plan and saw the appropriate information.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10093
Summary:
Depends on D9806. This implements the build simulator, which is used to calculate the order of build steps in the plan editor. This includes a migration script to convert existing plans from sequential based to dependency based, and then drops the sequence column.
Because build plans are now dependency based, the grippable and re-order behaviour has been removed.
Test Plan: Tested the migration, saw the dependencies appear correctly.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9847
Summary:
Ref T4896. Depends on D10052. This is the major/scary migration, but not really so bad. It is substantially similar to D8210, but less complex because there are fewer actions here.
This moves `PhabricatorAuditComment` storage to `PhabricatorAuditTransaction`, then reads `PhabricatorAuditComment`s as a proxy around the new objects.
Test Plan:
- Before migrating, browsed around. Nothing appeared broken.
- Migrated cleanly.
- Viewed old transactions (inlines, comments, accept/reject/etc, add auditors, add ccs, implicit CCs).
- Added all of those comment types.
- Edited a draft.
- Deleted a draft.
- Spot checked the database for sanity.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10055
Summary:
Ref T4896. This is substantially similar to D8196.
Migrate the comment text out of the `audit_comment` table and into the `audit_transaction_comment` table. Do double reads on `PhabricatorAuditComment` so the APIs aren't disturbed. The old table is still updated.
Test Plan:
- Before applying migration, cleared cache and browsed around. Things looked fine, except no comment text.
- Applied migration.
- Cleared cache, browsed around, saw all my old comments.
- Added some new comments.
- Spot checked migrated and new rows in database.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10020
Summary:
Ref T4896. This is substantially identical to the process which Differential followed, and mostly copied from the original Differential migration and the Differential proxy object.
Basically, we move all the data over but the application can't tell, and the same APIs do reads and writes to the new table.
Test Plan:
- Browsed UI before migrating, everything looked fine (but no inlines).
- Ran migration.
- Verified draft and published comments survived migration.
- Added a draft.
- Previewed draft.
- Submitted draft.
- Viewed standalone with drafts and published comments.
- Sanity checked data in database, didn't see anything unusual.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10018
Summary:
Ref T4896. This adds the new storage, without any code changes.
This storage is substantially identical to the Differential storage, except that `changesetID` has been replaced by `pathID`.
I've retained the properties intended to be used to implement T1460. They might not be quite right, but at least we'll be able to make any fixes consistently to both applications. For now, these fields are empty and ignored.
Test Plan: Ran `./bin/storage upgrade`. Nothing calls this code yet.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10017
Summary: Ref T5655. Rename `PhabricatorPHIDType` subclasses for clarity (see discussion in D9839). I'm not too keen on some of the resulting class names, so feel free to suggest alternatives.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9986
Summary:
Ref T2787. Carts need a status so we can tell if they've been purchased. Also kind of get WePay working as a one-time provider, and let charges not have a methodPHID (they won't for one-time providers).
All the status stuff is still super crazy rough and you can do things like start a checkout, add a bunch of stuff to your cart, complete the checkout, and have Phabricator think you paid for all the stuff you added. But this is fine for now since you can't actually edit carts, and also none of this is at all usable anyway. I'll refine some of the workflows in future diffs, for now I'm just getting things hooked up and technically working.
Test Plan:
- Purcahsed a cart and got a sort of status/done screen instead of a "your money is gone" exception.
- Went through the WePay flow and got a successful test checkout.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10003
Summary: Ref T2787. Makes charges a real object, allows providers to apply them. We are now (just barely) capable of stealing users' money.
Test Plan: {F179584}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10002
Summary:
Ref T2787. Make carts and purchases real objects, with storage, that kind-of work.
Roughly, the idea here is that applications create "purchases" (like "1 large t-shirt") and add them to "carts" (a user can have a lot of different carts at the same time), then hand things off to Phortune to deal with actualy charging a card. Roughly this works like Paypal or other similar systems do, except Phortune is the thing the user gets handed off to.
This doesn't do anything interesting/useful yet.
Also fix some bugs and update some UI.
Test Plan: Added a product to a cart, saw it in cart screen.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10001
Summary: The old class name isn't quite correct.
I'm just updating the migration rather than adding a new one to fix it since
this was very recently introduced and affects only installs using Asana auth,
so it's realistic that the number of affected installs might be 0.
Affected installs can use `--apply` to safely rerun the migration.
Auditors: joshuaspence
Summary: Add a missing migration which should have been included in D9982. Harbormaster and Herald PHIDs are used as actors in some transactions.
Test Plan: Ran `./bin/storage upgrade`. Saw a transaction render correctly as "Herald assigned this task to alincoln" instead of "Unknown Object (Application) assigned this task to alincoln".
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10028
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary: This migration script is required for D9999, which has already landed.
Test Plan: Ran `./bin/storage upgrade` and can log in again.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10010
Summary:
Fixes T5614. Ref T4420. Other than the "users" datasource and a couple of others, many datasources ignore what the user typed and just return all results, then rely on the client to filter them.
This works fine for rarely used ("legalpad documents") or always small ("task priorities", "applications") datasets, but is something we should graudally move away from as datasets get larger.
Add a token table to projects, populate it, and use it to drive the datasource query. Additionally, expose it on the applicationsearch UI.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Manually checked the table.
- Searched for projects by name from ApplicationSearch.
- Searched for projects by name from typeahead.
- Manually checked the typeahead response.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5614, T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9896
Summary: Ref T5245. This moves the actual storage over and stops reads and writes to the old table.
Test Plan:
- Verified tasks retained projects across the migration.
- Added and removed projects from tasks.
- Searched for: all, any, users' projects, not-in-projects, no-projects.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9850
Summary: Fixes T5611. We don't need sequences to be unique, and it makes it a pain to update them.
Test Plan: Dragged some columns around.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5611
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9914
Summary: Fixes T5336. Currently, `PhabricatorWorkerLeaseQuery` is basically FIFO. It makes more sense for the queue to be a priority-queue, and to assign higher priorities to alerts (email and SMS).
Test Plan: Created dummy tasks in the queue (with different priorities). Verified that the priority field was set correctly in the DB and that the priority was shown on the `/daemon/` page. Started a `PhabricatorTaskmasterDaemon` and verified that the higher priority tasks were executed before lower priority tasks.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5336
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9871
Summary:
Fixes T5532. Allow documents to have a preamble in the header which can be used to explain who should sign a document and why.
Particularly, I plan to use this to navigate the corporate vs individual stuff more sensibly.
Test Plan: {F174228}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5532
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9819
Summary: Ref T1049. This provides a user-configurable name field on build steps, which allows users to uniquely identify their steps. The intention is that this field will be used in D9806 to better identify the dependencies (rather than showing an unhelpful PHID).
Test Plan: Set the name of some build steps, saw it appear in the correct places.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9816
Summary:
Ref T5532. This adds:
- Documents can designate that they should be signed by "Corporations" or "Individuals".
- Corporate documents get different fields and a different exemption process.
- Basically everything works the same but this is like a zillion lines of form code.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5532
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9812
Summary:
Ref T5532. Allow document managers to add exemptions, which act like signatures but are tracked a little differently.
The primary use case for us is users who sign a corporate CLA and need a user-level exemption if they don't want to sign an individual CLA.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5532
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9795
Summary: Ref T5471. Adds an archived state for panels. Archived panels don't show up in the default query view or in the "Add Existing Panel" workflow.
Test Plan:
- Archived a panel.
- Activated a panel.
- Viewed / searched for archived/active panels.
- Popped "Add Existing Panel" dropdown and saw it omit archived panels.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5471
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9779
