Summary:
Ref T1191.
- Removes ponder comment table. This was migrated a very long time ago.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for removed table.
- Saw ~100 fewer issues in web UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10582
Summary:
Ref T1191. Notes:
- Drops the project affiliation table. This is a very old membership table which was migrated to edges.
- Drops the subproject table. This is a very old table for a removed feature.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for dropped tables.
- Saw ~100 fewer setup issues.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10581
Summary:
Ref T1191. Some notes here:
- Drops the old LDAP and OAuth info tables. These were migrated to the ExternalAccount table a very long time ago.
- Separates surplus/missing keys from other types of surplus/missing things. In the long run, my plan is to have only two notice levels:
- Error: something we can't fix (missing database, table, or column; overlong key).
- Warning: something we can fix (surplus anything, missing key, bad column type, bad key columns, bad uniqueness, bad collation or charset).
- For now, retaining three levels is helpful in generating all the expected scheamta.
Test Plan:
- Saw ~200 issues resolve, leaving ~1,300.
- Grepped for removed tables.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10580
Summary: Ref T1191. Handful of minor things here (T6150, T6149, T6148, T6147, T6146) but nothing very noteworthy.
Test Plan: Viewed web UI, saw fewer errors.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10527
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- Adds support for custom fields.
- Adds support for partial indexes (indexes on a prefix of a column).
- Drops old auxiliary storage table: this was moved to custom field storage about a year ago.
- Drops old project table: this was moved to edges about two months ago.
Test Plan:
- Viewed web UI, saw fewer issues.
- Used `grep` to verify no readers/writers for storage or project table.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10526
Summary:
Ref T1191. Three parts:
- The old way of getting key information only got primary / unique / foreign keys, not all keys. Use `SHOW INDEXES` to get all keys instead.
- Track key uniqueness and raise warnings about it.
- Add a new "all issues" view to show an expanded, flat view of all issues. This is just an easier way to get a list so you don't have to dig around in the hierarchical view.
Test Plan:
{F206351}
{F206352}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10525
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- There was a varchar(50) column. I changed it to `text64`, since this length is unusual.
- There was an int(3) column. I changed it to `int32`, since this length is unusual.
Test Plan: Ran migrations, saw warnings disappear from config tool.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10524
Summary: T1191. Nothing very notable here.
Test Plan: Saw more blue in web UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10522
Summary:
Ref T1191. Notable:
- Allowed objects to remove default columns (some feed tables have no `id`).
- Added a "note" severity and moved all the charset stuff down to that to make progress more clear.
Test Plan:
Trying to make the whole thing blue...
{F205970}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10519
Summary: Ref T1191. Fills in some more of the databases. Nothing very notable here. I didn't encounter any issues or overlong keys.
Test Plan: Used web UI to click around and verify expected schemata match up against actual schemata well.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10516
Summary: Ref T1191. This fills in some more features and gets audit and auth nearly generating reasonable expected schemata.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10500
Summary:
Ref T1191. This lays some groundwork for generating the expected schemata, so we can compare them to the actual schemata and produce a meaningful diff.
- In general, each application will subclass `PhabricatorConfigSchemaSpec` and provide a definition of the tables it expects.
- This class has helper methods to mostly-automatically build table definitions for Lisk and (in the future) edges.
- When building expected schema, we specify a "data type", like "epoch". This is the type of data the application stores in the column, from the application's point of view. The SchemaSpec converts this into the best avilable storage type: for example, "text" will translate to `utf8mb4` if it's availalbe, or `binary` if not. This gives us a layer of indirection to insulate us from craziness.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10497
Summary:
Ref T1191. This builds on the "view of the database as it exists" by building a view of the database as it is expected to exist (this is mostly empty for now) and comparing the two. We now render a view of the "comparison schema", which is the actual schema merged with the expected schema and annotated with the differences.
(I'm merging them like this because it makes it easier to handle both "missing" and "surpulus" warnings in a consistent way. If we tried to annotate just the actual or expected schema, the absence of components which are expected to exist is messy to handle.)
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10496
