Summary: Ref T10054. Take specialization off the objects and put it on Engine subclasses instead. One reason for this is that certain objects (like users) might have multiple different sets of panels in the future (e.g., their user profile and their home page).
Test Plan:
- No user-visible changes.
- PanelEngine no longer has any hardcoded "project" stuff.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15018
Summary:
Ref T10054. This does a big chunk of the legwork to let users reconfigure profile menus (currently, just project menus).
This includes:
- Editing builtin items (e.g., you can rename the default items).
- Creating new items (for now, only links are available).
This does not yet include:
- Hiding items.
- Reordering items.
- Lots of fancy types of items (dashboards, etc).
- Any UI changes.
- Documentation (does feature: TODO link for documentation).
Test Plan:
{F1060695}
{F1060696}
{F1060697}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15010
Summary: Ref T10054. This has no product impact, but prepares us for customizable side nav on "profiles" (today, projects; probably users some day; and maybe other stuff down the road).
Test Plan: Clicked all links on a profile, everything was exactly the same as before.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15007
Summary:
Ref T10010. Ref T5819. General alignment of the stars:
- There were some hacks in Conduit around stripping `fa-...` off icons when reading and writing that I wanted to get rid of.
- We probably have room for a subtitle in the new heavy nav, and using the icon name is a good starting point (and maybe good enough on its own?)
- The project list was real bad looking with redundant tag/names, now it is very slightly less bad looking with non-redundant types?
- Some installs will want to call Milestones something else, and this gets us a big part of the way there.
- This may slightly help to reinforce "tag" vs "policy" vs "group" stuff?
---
I'm letting installs have enough rope to shoot themselves in the foot (e.g., define 100 icons). It isn't the end of the world if they reuse icons, and is clearly their fault.
I think the cases where 100 icons will break down are:
- Icon selector dialog may get very unwieldy.
- Query UI will be pretty iffy/huge with 100 icons.
We could improve these fairly easily if an install comes up with a reasonable use case for having 100 icons.
---
The UI on the icon itself in the list views is a little iffy -- mostly, it's too saturated/bold.
I'd ideally like to try either:
- rendering a "shade" version (i.e. lighter, less-saturated color); or
- rendering a "shade" tag with just the icon in it.
However, there didn't seem to be a way to do the first one right now (`fa-example sh-blue` doesn't work) and the second one had weird margins/padding, so I left it like this for now. I figure we can clean it up once we build the thick nav, since that will probably also want an identical element.
(I don't want to render a full tag with the icon + name since I think that's confusing -- it looks like a project/object tag, but is not.)
Test Plan:
{F1049905}
{F1049906}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: 20after4, Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T5819, T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14918
Summary:
Ref T10010.
Currently, milestone subproject have editable icons/colors, but I don't think this is likely to be used much (the expectation is that milestones will be common and homogenous, and it doesn't make much sense to pick different icons for "Sprint 32" vs "Sprint 33", I think).
Locking the icon and color lets us simplify the form, make milestones more distinct, and potentially reuse the color later for other things (e.g., active/future/past or on time / overdue or whatever else) or just give them a special color to make them more visible.
The best argument for retaining this that I can come up with is that certain milestones may be special (e.g., Sprint 19 is a major release?), but you can just name it "Sprint 19 (v3.0!)" or something, which seems pretty good for now.
Also don't show milestones on task browse/list view.
Test Plan: {F1048532}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14912
Summary:
Ref T10010.
- Default name to "Milestone X".
- Remove policy controls, which have no effect.
- Don't generate slugs for milestones since this is a big pain where they all generate as `#milestone_1` by default (you can add one if you want). I plan to add some kind of syntax like `#parent/32` to mean "Milestone 32 in Parent" later.
- Don't require projects to have unique names (again, 900 copies of "Milestone X"). I think we can trust users to sort this out for themselves since modern Phabricator has "Can Create Projects" permission, etc.
Test Plan: Created some milestones, had a less awful experience.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14909
Summary:
Ref T10010. This has a lot of UI/UX problems but I think it:
- technically allows subproject creation;
- technically allows milestone creation;
- doesn't let users unwittingly destroy their installs (probably).
Test Plan:
- Created milestones.
- Created subprojects.
- Created and edited normal projects.
- Observed some reasonable interactions (e.g., you can't create milestones for a milestone or edit a superproject's members).
- Observed plenty of silly/confusing interactions that need additional work.
{F1046657}
{F1046658}
{F1046655}
{F1046656}
{F1046654}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14904
Summary: Ref T10010. This is primarily to make "Parent > Child > Grandchild" navigation more manageable for subprojects, at least for now.
Test Plan: Viewed profile, members, feed; saw crumbs.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14891
Summary: Ref T10010. This still needs support for attachments (to get members) and more constraints (like slugs), but mostly works.
Test Plan: Ran query, saw basically sensible results.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14889
Summary:
Ref T10010. This adds infrastructure for querying projects by type, depth, parent and ancestor.
I needed to revise the "extended policy check" cycle detection rules. When, e.g., querying a grandchild, they incorrectly detected a cycle because both the child and grandchild needed to check the policy of the grandparent.
Instead, simplify it to just do a basic runaway calldepth check. There are many other safety mechanisms to make it so this can't ever occur.
(Cycle detection does have existing test coverage, and those tests still pass, it just takes a little longer to detect the cycle internally.)
There is still no way to create subprojects in the UI.
Test Plan: Added and executed unit tests.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14862
Summary:
Ref T10010. This implements technical groundwork for subprojects. Specifically, it implements policy rules like Phriction:
- to see a project, you must be able to see all of its parents (and the project itself).
- you can edit a project if you can edit any of its parents (or the project itself).
To facilitiate this, we load all project ancestors when querying projects so we can do the view/edit checks.
This does NOT yet implement:
- proper membership rules for these projects (up next);
- any kind of UI to let users create subprojects.
Test Plan:
- Added unit tests.
- Executed unit tests.
- Browsed Projects (no change in behavior is expected).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14861
Summary: Ref T9979. This simplifies/standardizes the code a bit, but mostly gives us more consistent class names and structure.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/search index --type ...` to index documents of every indexable type.
- Searched for documents by unique text, found them.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9979
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14842
Summary:
Ref T10010. This does some cleanups on the schema:
- `viewPolicy`, `editPolicy` and `joinPolicy` were nullable, but should never be `null`. Set them to defaults if they're null, then make the column non-nullable.
- Rename `phrictionSlug` to `primarySlug` and stop adding and removing trailing slashes from it.
- Add new columns to support milestones and non-milestone subprojects.
- Drop very old subprojectPHIDs column. This hasn't done anything in the UI for years and years, and isn't particularly realistic to migrate forward.
The new columns aren't reachable from the UI.
Test Plan:
- Applied patches.
- Grepped for `phrictionSlug`.
- Grepped for `subprojectPHIDs`.
- Created tasks.
- Edited tasks.
- Verified existing tasks still had primary slugs.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14825
Summary:
Ref T9551. We currently use the same logic for generating project hashtags and Phriction slugs, but should be a little more conservative with project hashtags.
Stop them from generating with stuff that won't parse in a "Reviewers:" field or generally in commments (commas, colons, etc).
Test Plan:
Created a bunch of projects with nonsense in them and saw them generate pretty reasonable hashtags.
{F873456}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9551
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14261
Summary: Fixes T7284. We were initialized the project name to the empty string, which was making things work like a rename, including automagically adding the old slug.
Test Plan: made a project and no more "empty" tag being made. also don't have that bad transaction story anymore.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7284
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11794
Summary: Fixes T6693.
Test Plan:
Made a bunch of comments on a diff with differential, being sure to leave inlines here and there. This reproduced the issue in T6693. With this patch this issue no longer reproduces!
Successfully "showed older changes" in Maniphest too.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6693
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10931
Summary: Ref T4712. These are a bit time consuming to test so might as well send off a batch now and again.
Test Plan: foreach impacted controller, made sure the timeline rendered as it did before. for project column and config, noted the "should terminate" UI was also rendered unlike before.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4712
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10923
Summary: Fixes T6567, lets admins set a default policy for new Projects.
Test Plan: Changed the default Policy, created a new Project. Project had correct defaults.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6567
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10890
Summary:
Fixes T6145, T4016.
Filed T6287 and T6288 for some polish on this.
Test Plan: Made new projects from Maniphest - great success. Made new projects from project / create - also great success.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4016, T6145
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10679
Summary:
Ref T1191. For most text columns, we either don't care if "a" and "A" are the same, or we expect them to be different (for example: keys, domains, secrets, etc). Default text columns to the `_bin` collation so they are compared by strict character value. This is safer in cases where we aren't sure.
For some text columns, we allow the user to sort by the column in the UI (like Maniphest task titles) or we do care that "A" and "a" are the same (for example: project names). Introduce a new class of virtual data types, the "sort..." types, to cover these columns. These are like the "text..." types but use sorting collations which treat "A" and "a" the same.
Test Plan:
- Made an effort to identify all columns where the UI relies on database collation.
- Ran `bin/storage adjust` and cleared all warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: beng, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10602
Summary:
Ref T1191. Ref T6203. While generating expected schemata, I ran into these columns which seem to have sketchy nullability.
- Mark most of them for later resolution (T6203). They work fine today and don't need to block T1191. Changing them can break the application, so we can't autofix them.
- Forgive a couple of them that are sort-of reasonable or going to get wiped out.
Test Plan: Saw 94 remaining warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191, T6203
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10593
Summary:
Ref T1191. Notes:
- Drops the project affiliation table. This is a very old membership table which was migrated to edges.
- Drops the subproject table. This is a very old table for a removed feature.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for dropped tables.
- Saw ~100 fewer setup issues.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10581
Summary:
Fixes T5603. Puts the toggling of locking membership into the editor so we get exceptions and all that.
I think the dialogue when you try to leave a project that is locked could be a little better maybe? Right now it just says "You can't leave" and "The membership is locked" more or less; should I surface a link to the policy stuff there too?
Test Plan:
- made a project, toggled the "lock" setting, observed stickiness and good transactions being made
- locked a project and tried to leave as a non-editor - got a dialogue letting me know i couldn't
- locked a project and tried to leave as an editor - left successfully
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10508
Summary: Ref T5655. Rename `PhabricatorPHIDType` subclasses for clarity (see discussion in D9839). I'm not too keen on some of the resulting class names, so feel free to suggest alternatives.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9986
Summary: Ref T5655. The `PhabricatorDestructibleInterface` interface is misspelled as `PhabricatorDestructableInterface`. Fix the spelling mistake.
Test Plan: `grep`. Seeing as this interface is fairly recent, I don't expect that this would cause any widespread breakages.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9988
Summary:
Fixes T5614. Ref T4420. Other than the "users" datasource and a couple of others, many datasources ignore what the user typed and just return all results, then rely on the client to filter them.
This works fine for rarely used ("legalpad documents") or always small ("task priorities", "applications") datasets, but is something we should graudally move away from as datasets get larger.
Add a token table to projects, populate it, and use it to drive the datasource query. Additionally, expose it on the applicationsearch UI.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Manually checked the table.
- Searched for projects by name from ApplicationSearch.
- Searched for projects by name from typeahead.
- Manually checked the typeahead response.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5614, T4420
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9896
Summary: This further helps differentiate types/roles for projects.
Test Plan: {F169758}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9710
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rP, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.
Test Plan: Eyeballed it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9431
Summary: Fixes T5235. Implement `PhabricatorDestructableInterface` on `PhabricatorProject` so that projects can be deleted with `./bin/remove destroy`.
Test Plan: Created (and then destroyed) a test project. Verified that the corresponding objects (project, slugs and workboard columns) were removed from the database.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5235
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9352
Summary: Fixes T5090. Introduced getIcon into Handle stack which allows you to specify a per handle icon. getIcon falls back ot getTypeIcon.
Test Plan: changed the icon on a project a bunch. verified transactions showed up. verified icon showed up in typeahead. verified icon showed up in tokens that were pre-generated (not typed in). units test passed.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5090
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9264
Summary:
Fixes T4021. Chooses to keep a "primary" slug based off the name - including all that lovely logic - and allow the user to specify "additional" slugs. Expose these as "hashtags" to the user.
Sets us up for a fun diff where we can delete all the Project => Phriction automagicalness. In terms of this diff, see the TODOs i added.
Test Plan:
added a primary slug as an additional slug - got an error. added a slug in use on another project - got an error. added multiple good slugs and they worked. removed slugs and it worked. made some remark using multiple new slugs and they all linked to the correct project
ran epriestley's case
- Create project "A".
- Give it additional slug "B".
- Try to create project "B".
and i got a nice error about hashtag collision
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4021
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9250
Summary:
Ref T4967. Adds a "Watch" relationship to projects, which is stronger than member/subscribed.
Specifically, when a task is tagged with a project, we'll include all project watchers in the email/notifications. Normally we don't include projects unless they're explicitly CC'd, or have some other active role in the object (like being a reviewer or auditor).
This allows you to closely follow a project without needing to write a Herald rule for every project you care about.
Test Plan:
- Watched/unwatched a project.
- Tested the watch/subscribe/member relationships:
- Watching implies subscribe.
- Joining implies subscribe.
- Leaving implies unsubscribe + unwatch.
- You can't unsubscribe until you unwatch (slightly better would be unsubscribe implies unwatch, but this is a bit tricky).
- Watched a project, then recevied email about a tagged task without otherwise being involved.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9185
Summary:
Fixes T4379. Several changes:
- Migrate all project members into subscribers.
- When members are added or removed, subscribe or unsubscribe them.
- Show sub/unsub in the UI.
- Determine mailable membership of projects by querying subscribers.
Test Plan:
- As `duck`, joined a project.
- Added the project as a reviewer to a revision.
- Commented on the revision.
- Observed `duck` receive mail.
- Unsubscribed as `duck`.
- Observed no mail.
- Resubscribed as `duck`.
- Mail again.
- Joined/left project, checked sub/unsub status.
- Ran migration, looked at database.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, asherkin
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8189
Summary:
Ref T4379. Long ago, the "Project" vs "ProjectProfile" split was intended to allow a bunch of special fields on projects without burdening the simple use cases, but CustomField handles that far better and far more generally, and doing this makes using ApplicationTransactions a pain to get right, so get rid of it.
The only remaining field is `profileImagePHID`, which we can just move to the main Project object. This is custom enough that I think it's reasonable not to express it as a custom field.
Test Plan: Created a project, set profile, edited project, viewed in typeahead, ran migration, verified database results.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8183
Summary:
Ref T4379. Ref T3794. Fixes T4010. This brings CustomFields to projects.
My primary goal is to get rid of the special casing around project profiles and profile editing, so all edits are ApplicationTransactions. Particularly, I want to make the "blurb/description" field a custom field which goes through builtin infrastructure.
A distant secondary goal is that this is a feature which users like/want because users like/want features.
Test Plan: Added a custom field and examined it in the edit, view, and search interfaces.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3794, T4010, T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8180
Summary:
Ref T4379. Projects currently include their "delete/disable" function as part of edit, which is atypical. Instead, provide it as a first-class action. This is primarily for consistency between applications.
(The action list on projects is getting pretty huge, but we can deal with that separately; I have some ideas.)
Test Plan: Archived/unarchived a project. Edited a project.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8177
Summary:
Ref T4379. Perform all editing with modern transaction infrastructure. A few practical changes here:
- Message for "project name required" should be a little nicer. I'll deal with this once more stuff gets straightened out. You get a reasonable message now, it's just not nicely handled as part of the form.
- Message for "project name is not unique" should be a little nicer. Same as above.
- Previously, we would automatically archive a project when the last member left or was removed. I'll probably restore this in a bit but am omitting it for the moment for simplicity.
- Previously, we would create projects with goofy nonsensical permissions. Now we create them with reasonable permissions.
Test Plan:
- Created project.
- Edited project.
- Ran unit tests.
- Viewed project edit history.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8168
Summary:
Ref T4379. I want project subscriptions to work like this (yell if this seems whacky, since it makes subscriptions mean somethign a little different for projects than they do for other objects):
- You can only subscribe to a project if you're a project member.
- When you're added as a member, you're added as a subscriber.
- When you're removed as a member, you're removed as a subscriber.
- While you're a member, you can optionally unsubscribe.
From a UI perspective:
- We don't show the subscriber list, since it's going to be some uninteresting subset of the member list.
- We don't show CC transactions in history, since they're an uninteresting near-approximation of the membership transactions.
- You only see the subscription controls if you're a member.
To do this, I've augmented `PhabricatorSubscribableInterface` with two new methods. It would be nice if we were on PHP 5.4+ and could just use traits for this, but we should get data about version usage before we think about this. For now, copy/paste the default implementations into every implementing class.
Then, I implemented the interface in `PhabricatorProject` but with alternate defaults.
Test Plan:
- Used the normal interaction on existing objects.
- This has no actual effect on projects, verified no subscription stuff mysteriously appeared.
- Hit the new error case by fiddling with the UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8165
Summary: See title. Fixes T1809.
Test Plan:
verified each type that has flaggable interface still can be flagged
verified that new custom query filter works
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1809
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7392
Summary:
Ref T603. This cleans up an existing callsite in the policy filter, and opens up some stuff in the future.
Some policy objects don't have real PHIDs:
PhabricatorTokenGiven
PhabricatorSavedQuery
PhabricatorNamedQuery
PhrequentUserTime
PhabricatorFlag
PhabricatorDaemonLog
PhabricatorConduitMethodCallLog
ConduitAPIMethod
PhabricatorChatLogEvent
PhabricatorChatLogChannel
Although it would be reasonable to add real PHIDs to some of these (like `ChatLogChannel`), it probably doesn't make much sense for others (`DaemonLog`, `MethodCallLog`). Just let them return `null`.
Also remove some duplicate `$id` and `$phid` properties. These are declared on `PhabricatorLiskDAO` and do not need to be redeclared.
Test Plan: Ran the `testEverythingImplemented` unit test, which verifies that all classes conform to the interface.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7306
Summary:
Ref T603. Move toward stamping out all the Project / ProjectProfile query irregularities with respect to policies.
- Fixes a bug with Asana publishing when the remote task is deleted.
- Fixes an issue with Herald commit rules.
Test Plan:
- Viewed projects;
- edited projects;
- added and removed members from projects;
- republished Asana-bridged feed stories about commits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7251
Summary:
Ref T603. Adds clarifying text which expands on policies and explains exceptions and rules. The goal is to provide an easy way for users to learn about special policy rules, like "task owners can always see a task".
This presentation might be a little aggressive. That's probably OK as we introduce policies, but something a little more tempered might be better down the road.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7150
Summary:
Ref T3599
Go through everything, grep a bit, replace some bits.
Test Plan: Navigate around a bit
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3599
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6871
Summary: Ref T2715. Move Projects to the new stuff.
Test Plan: Used `phid.query` to load projects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2715
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6526
Summary:
Fixes T2675, T2676.
- when the last person leaves a project it is archived.
- a script to archive all memberless projects
- better feed stories for the various policy edits you can do
- phriction pages are also moved as you rename projects
Test Plan: edited some projects and noted reasonable feed stories. ran script against test data and it worked! left a last man standing project and it archived. renamed a project to "a" then "b" then "a" (etc) and it worked including phrictiondocument moves
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2676, T2675
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6478
