1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-29 02:02:41 +01:00
Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
2a5c987c71 Lock policy queries to their applications
Summary:
While we mostly have reasonable effective object accessibility when you lock a user out of an application, it's primarily enforced at the controller level. Users can still, e.g., load the handles of objects they can't actually see. Instead, lock the queries to the applications so that you can, e.g., never load a revision if you don't have access to Differential.

This has several parts:

  - For PolicyAware queries, provide an application class name method.
  - If the query specifies a class name and the user doesn't have permission to use it, fail the entire query unconditionally.
  - For handles, simplify query construction and count all the PHIDs as "restricted" so we get a UI full of "restricted" instead of "unknown" handles.

Test Plan:
  - Added a unit test to verify I got all the class names right.
  - Browsed around, logged in/out as a normal user with public policies on and off.
  - Browsed around, logged in/out as a restricted user with public policies on and off. With restrictions, saw all traces of restricted apps removed or restricted.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7367
2013-10-21 17:20:27 -07:00
epriestley
9383abc6b0 Remove unnecessary empty checks from willFilterPage()
Summary: Fixes T3600. These checks are obsolete after D6512.

Test Plan: Syntax / static / inspection.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3600

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6563
2013-07-24 15:30:26 -07:00
epriestley
960ac3b2a6 Phortune v0
Summary:
Ref T2787. This does very little so far, but makes inroads on accounts and billing. This is mostly just modeled on what Stripe looks like. The objects are:

  - **Account**: Has one or more authorized users, who can make manage the account. An example might be "Phacility", and the three of us would be able to manage it. A user may be associated with more than one account (e.g., a corporate account and a personal account) but the UI tries to simplify the common case of a single account.
  - **Payment Method**: Something we can get sweet sweet money from; for now, a credit card registered with Stripe. Payment methods are associated with an account.
  - **Product**: A good (one time charge) or service (recurring charge). This might be "t-shirt" or "enterprise plan" or "hourly support" or whatever else.
  - **Purchase**: Represents a user purchasing a Product for an Account, using a Payment Method. e.g., you bought a shirt, or started a plan, or purchased support.
  - **Charge**: Actual charges against payment methods. A Purchase can create more than one charge if it's a plan, or if the first charge fails and we re-bill.

This doesn't fully account for stuff like coupons/discounts yet but they should fit into the model without any issues.

This only implements `Account`, and that only partially.

Test Plan: {F37531}

Reviewers: chad, btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5435
2013-03-28 09:10:34 -07:00