Summary: Ref T603. Make this a little easier to use by highlighting the current value.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7289
Summary: Ref T603. After thinking about this for a bit I can't really come up with anything better than what Facebook does, so I'm going to implement something similar for choosing custom policies. To start with, swap this over to a JS-driven dropdown.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7285
Summary:
Ref T603. This isn't remotely usable yet, but I wanted to get any feedback before I build it out anymore.
I think this is a reasonable interface for defining custom policies? It's basically similar to Herald, although it's a bit simpler.
I imagine users will rarely interact with this, but this will service the high end of policy complexity (and allow the definition of things like "is member of LDAP group" or whatever).
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, asherkin
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7217
Summary:
Ref T1279. Although I think this is a bad idea in general (we once supported it, removed it, and seemed better off for it) users expect it to exist and want it to be available. Give them enough rope to shoot themselves in the foot.
I will probably write some lengthy treatise on how you shouldn't use this rule later.
Implementation is straightforward because Differential previously supported this rule.
This rule can also be used to add project reviewers.
Test Plan: Made some "add reviewers" rules, created revisions, saw reviewers trigger.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7235
Summary:
- Use the box view in the test console.
- Let the test console load tasks and mocks. We should move this to the adapters (`canAdaptObject($object)` or something).
- Fix a minor issue with "Always": hiding the whole cell could make the table layout weird in Safari, at least. Just hide the select instead.
Test Plan:
- Used test console on task.
- Used test console on mock.
- Created (silly) rule with "Always" and also some other conditions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7220
Summary:
Fixes T1461.
Adds
- FIELD_ALWAYS - now you could add this to a content type to always get notified
- FIELD_REPOSITORY_AUTOCLOSE_BRANCH - solves T1461
- CONDITION_UNCONDITIONALLY - used by these two fields to not show any value for the user to select
Test Plan: made a herald rule where diffs on autoclose branches would get flagged blue. made a diff on an autoclose branch and committed it. commit was flagged!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1461
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7210
Summary: ...and deploy on Maniphest. Ref T1638.
Test Plan: created a herald rule to be cc'd for tasks created via web. made a task via web and another via email and was cc'd appropriately. edited the herald to be cc'd for tasks created via not web. made 2 tasks again and got cc'd appropriately
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1638
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7145
Summary:
Currently, draggable lists (in Config and ApplicationSearch, for example) don't let you drag an item into the first position.
This is because the behavior is correct in Maniphest: the first position is above an initial header, like "High Prioirty", and shouldn't be targetable.
Permit the behavior in general; forbid it in Maniphest.
Test Plan:
- Dragged elements into the first position in ApplicationSearch.
- Failed to drag elements into the first position in Maniphest.
Reviewers: garoevans, btrahan
Reviewed By: garoevans
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7128
Summary:
Fixes T3814. Broadly, remarkup tables in inline comments did not work properly. I ran into several messes here and cleaned up some of them:
- Some of this code is doing `JX.$N('div', {}, JX.$H(response.markup))`, to turn an HTML response into a node, passing that around, and then doing junk with it. This is super old and gross.
- The slightly more modern pattern is `JX.$H(response.markup).getFragment().firstChild`, but this is kind of yuck too and not as safe as it could be.
- Introduce `JX.$H(response.markup).getNode()`, which actually expresses intent here. We have a bunch of `getFragment().firstChild` callsites which should switch to this, but I didn't clean those up yet because I don't want to test them all.
- Switch the `JX.$N('div', {}, JX.$H(response.markup))`-style callsites to `JX.$H(response.markup).getNode()`.
- `copyRows()` is too aggressive in finding `<tr />` tags. This actually causes the bug in T3814. We only want to find these tags at top level, not all tags. Don't copy `<tr />` tags which belong to some deeper table.
- Once this is fixed, there's another bug with mousing over the cells in tables in inline comments. We select the nearest `<td />`, but that's the cell in the remarkup table. Instead, select the correct `<td />`.
- At this point, these last two callsites were looking ugly. I provided `findAbove()` to clean them up.
Test Plan: Created, edited, deleted, moused over, and reloaded a revision with inline comments including remarkup tables. Used "Show more context" links.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3814
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6924
Summary: Adds plain support for object lists that just look like lists
Test Plan: review UIexamples and a number of other applications
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6922
Summary: Fixes T2213
Test Plan: Updated a pholio mock description. Observed that when I first showed details there was a round trip made. Toggled show / hide noting no more trips made to server.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2213
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6801
Summary: take epriestley's feedback 'cuz its good
Test Plan: collapse, expand, use undo like a rockstar. observe proper behavior
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2258
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6748
Summary: Fixes T2258.
Test Plan: collapsed and expanded file via the dropdown - good stuff. got the "undo" element into the mix - also good stuff.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2258
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6742
Summary: Fixes T3715. Makes "visible" global instead of per-menu, so all the menus share a visible state.
Test Plan: For menus A and B, clicked "A, A", "A, B, A", "A, B, B", "A, B, B, A", etc. Couldn't figure out a way to break it.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3715
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6745
Summary:
companion diff to D6729. This is the back-end stuff, plus calls the JS in D6729 for when images are removed, un-removed, uploaded, or replaced.
Fixes T3640.
Test Plan: messed around with images. hit save - new order! temporarily showed these stories and got text about re-ordering stuff.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3640
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6731
Summary:
Ref T3640. JS part only, should give you a list in `imageOrder` on the server that you can read with `$request->getStrList('imageOrder')`.
NOTE: You can't drag images into the first position; this is an existing thing that I just need to fix with DraggableList.
@chad might have some design feedback.
Test Plan: Dragged images around, things seemed to work?
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3640
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6729
Summary: Fixes T3641. Probably needs some @chad love though on colors and what have you. Technique was to jam this into the existing notifications stuff as much as possible. I think its "okay" but if we were to add more stuff here (like a 3rd application) this could get a quality pass to consolidate even more code.
Test Plan: played with it in Chrome and Safari - looks reasonable
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3641
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6708
Summary: Ref T3671. Depends on D6674. Continues work in D6673, D6674 and extends it into Legalpad and Phriction. Then deletes a bunch of dead code.
Test Plan: Edited documents in Legalpad and Phriction, verified I got reasonable looking previews.
Reviewers: btrahan, Firehed
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3671
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6675
Summary:
Ref T3578. Ref T3671. Depends on D6673. Use `PHUIRemarkupPreviewPanel` (introduced in D6673) to provide question create/edit and answer edit previews in Ponder.
Then delete a million lines of duplicate code.
Test Plan: Edited a question; edited an answer. Saw live previews.
Reviewers: btrahan, Firehed
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3578, T3671
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6674
Summary:
Ref T3671. A lot of applications have pretty ad-hoc preview code. Clean it up a bit and add Summary preview to Differential.
After ApplicationTransactions we might want to try to serialize the whole form and show a preview of all the transactions, but this seems not very useful in most cases (I'd guess that Remarkup previews are 99% of the value) and tricky to get right (e.g., adding images which don't exist yet to Pholio mocks).
I think I can add this in a few other places, too.
Test Plan:
Edited Maniphest Tasks and Differential Revisions, mashed some buttons. Verified previews rendered correctly. Grepped for removed CSS classes (no hits).
{F52907}
Reviewers: btrahan, Firehed
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3671
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6673
Summary:
Add the ability to select singular and multiple lines in paste to highlight.
This is related to T3627
Test Plan: Create a paste, select one or more lines.
Reviewers: epriestley, tberman
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3627
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6668
Summary:
...bsasically add a "view mode" and play with that throughout the stack. Differences are...
- normal mode has comments; history mode does not
- normal mode has inline comments; history mode does not
- page uris are correct with respect to either mode
...and that's about it. I played around (wasted too much time) trying to make this cuter. I think just jamming this mode in here is the easiest / cleanest thing at the end. Feel free to tell me otherwise!
This largely gets even better via T3612. However, this fixes T3572.
Test Plan: played around with a mock with some history. noted correct uris on images. noted no errors in js console.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3572
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6638
Summary:
Ref T3373. The submit listener doesn't properly scope the form it listens to right now, so several forms on the page mean that comments post to one of them more or less at random.
Scope it properly by telling it which object PHID it is associated with.
Test Plan: Made Question comments, saw comments Ajax in on the question itself rather than on an arbitrary answer.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6611
Summary:
Ref T3373. This is still pretty messy:
- The JS bugs out a bit with multiple primary object PHIDs on a single page. I'll fix this in a followup.
- The comment form itself is enormous, I'll restore some show/hide stuff in a followup.
Test Plan: Added answer comments in Ponder.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6608
Summary:
Now you can actually replace an image! Ref T3572. This ended up needing a wee bit of infrastructure to work...
- add replace image transaction to pholio
- add replacesImagePHID to PholioImage
- tweaks to editor to properly update images with respect to replacement
- add edges to track replacement
- expose getNodes on graph query infrastructure to query the entire graph of who replaced who
- move pholio image to new phid infrastructure
Still TODO - the history view should get chopped out a bit from the current view - no more inline comments / generally less functionality plus maybe a tweak or two to make this more sensical.
Test Plan: replaced images and played with history controller a little. works okay.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3572
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6560
Summary: Far from perfect, but better?
Test Plan:
{F51153}
{F51154}
{F51155}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6533
Summary:
Ref T3572. Needs some CSS tweaks, but this lets you drag an image on top of another image to replace it. There's no server-side or transaction support (and I'm not planning to build that), I just wanted to clear the way on the JS side.
You'll get an additional array posted called `replaces`. Keys are old file PHIDs; values are new file PHIDs.
Note that a key may not exist yet (if a user adds an image, and then also replaces that same image). In this case, the server should just treat it as an add.
Test Plan: Dragged images on top of other images.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3572
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6499
Summary: Ref T2637. Allows you to "undo" if you delete an image from a mock by accident.
Test Plan:
Deleted; undo'd.
{F50878}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2637
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6498
Summary: Fixes T3553. Did it by adding some code that refreshes the File object on keyup events within a given file entry. also fixes an html derp I found trying to fix this.
Test Plan: added cool things like 'bbb' to every field and noted they were maintained when I added more files
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, Korvin, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3553
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6488
Summary: Fixes T3544. Depends on D6475. This was just a missing dependency combined with some questionable error handling which I'll maybe fix some day.
Test Plan: Loaded page, saw result.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3544
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6476
Summary: When user changed his mind for voting, counting does not work properly. If user vote up first and vote down, vote count must be decreased 2. fixed in javascript file
Test Plan:
http://cihad.phabricator.pompa.la/Q11
user : demo
pass : demodemo
Reviewers: aran, Korvin, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: simsekburak
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6446
Summary: Fixes T2652. Did some testing post T2691 to see if I could close this and noted an error in the JS if you view the page not logged in. This fixes that error. Everything else I can think of seems to work...? :D
Test Plan: played around with a mock not logged in and got sensible interactions and no errors
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2652
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6438
Summary: Fixes T3509. Generally tried to make the code more consistently use get_image_scale, as well as make get_image_scale aware that sometimes images need to be scaled because they're too tall (as well as too wide).
Test Plan: used the file from T3509. noted comment box appearing correctly as clicked, or clicked and dragged. submitted some comments and noted the reticles moved / scaled correctly as I resized the browser window
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3509
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6418
Summary:
1. Show add reviewer typehead when user selects resign as a reviewer.
2. Change the label for add reviewers typehead when user selects resign as a reviewer.
Test Plan:
1. Add yourself as a reviewer in a diff.
2. Select "Resign as Reviewer" in comment editor.
Add reviewer typehead should display, with label "Suggest Another Reviewer".
Add reviewer typehead is also displayed after user refreshed the page with "Resign as Reviewer"
selected.
Reviewers: wez, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, akramer, person
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6340
Summary: Ref T1703. Put a more reasonable UI than "blob of JSON" on top of this.
Test Plan:
Reordered, enabled and disabled user profile fields.
{F49317}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6393
Summary: Fixes T3473, mostly reverts previous changes to clean up required field text, will have to redesign that in general for responsiveness.
Test Plan: use logout form, use new conpherence form
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3473
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6371
Summary:
Ref T2852. Primarily, this expands API access to Asana. As a user-visible effect, it links Asana tasks in Remarkup.
When a user enters an Asana URI, we register an onload behavior to make an Ajax call for the lookup. This respects privacy imposed by the API without creating a significant performance impact.
Test Plan: {F47183}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6274
Summary: ...also make it so in Pholio when you add an inline comment the preview refreshes. Fixes T2649.
Test Plan: played around in pholio leaving commentary. noted that a new inline comment would refresh the preview.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2649
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6267
Summary: the people widget was returning a comma-delimited list of HTML nodes so kill that noise with some hsprintf action. We also weren't consistently updating the latest transaction id so simplify those codepaths (widgets vs pontificate) a bit. Fixes T3336.
Test Plan: left some messages, added some participants. noted that the people widget looked good and only the pertinent transactions were pulled down on updates.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3336
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6180
Summary:
- Use the same styles for shared operations (`drag-ghost`, `drag-dragging`).
- Move shared code into the base class.
Test Plan: Dragged around tasks and named queries.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6141
Summary:
Also you have to drop them. So drag, and then drop.
This needs some cleanup and reconciliation/generalization with the Maniphest implementation. In particular, you can't drag things to the very top right now, and they should share more CSS and more behaviors.
Test Plan:
Look I alphabetized them:
{F45286}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6136
Summary: See discussion in D6131, D6130. This turned into 35 layers of mess so throw it away and just tweak the JS to be more flexible.
Test Plan:
- Clicked "Show More Applications".
- Clicked "Show Fewer Applications".
- Edited tasks using popup dialog.
- Tried to drag tasks using pencil icon (correctly no longer works).
- Changed threads in Conpherence.
- Not sure how to actually hit the Conpherence "Load ... Threads" thing since
it seems to auto-load? But that works, at least, and the code doesn't really
care what you hit.
- Added a conpherence participant.
- Added a new calendar item.
- Poked around other menus.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6133
Summary:
I want to use draggable lists in at least three other interfaces:
- (Today) Reorganizing named search queries.
- (Today) Reorganizing custom fields.
- (Future) Dragging tasks around on boards.
This mostly generalizes the drag-and-drop code in Maniphest's task list. It isn't a total generalization and will need some more tweaking (for example, Maniphest's list is unusual in that the user can't drag items to the top of the list), but it substantially separates the Maniphest-specific behaviors from the general dragging behaviors.
This diff causes no functional changes.
Test Plan: Dragged and dropped tasks in Maniphest.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6124
Summary:
Fixes T1945. Ref T2947. At various times, installs (Disqus, Dropbox, etc.) have asked for a way to edit tasks more quickly. Provide edit-from-lists.
{F44700}
{F44701}
The one rough edge on this is that if you change the task priority we update it inline but don't move it. It's probably infeasible to actually move it, but maybe we could give it some sort of visual style to indicate that it's dirty.
Test Plan: Edited tasks normally and via this action thing.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: tido, deuresti, ahoffer, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1945, T2947
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6086
Summary: Fixes T3280 - when a pontificate brought back multiple transactions, we were rendering a comma. Yay hsprintf. Also fixes the noconpherences view, which broke at some point recently.
Test Plan: sent comment, then replied from different browser. when both comments loaded noted no comma. loaded a conpherence view with no conpherences and verified it looked good.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3280
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6079
Summary: and now you can add more than one at a time! Also adds the 'add participants' and 'new calendar event' options to mobile view. Fixes T3251. Ref T3253.
Test Plan: loaded up these "adders" on both desktop and device-ish views and it went well!
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3251, T3253
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6075
