Summary:
Ref T13077. We need to know the maximum version of a document in several cases, so denormalize it onto the Document object.
Then clean up some behaviors where we edit a document with, e.g., 7 versions but version 5 is currently published. For now, we: edit starting with version 7, save as version 8, and immediately publish the new version.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Edited a draft page without hitting any weird version errors.
- Checked database for sensible `maxVersion` values.
Reviewers: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19625
Summary:
Ref T13077. This is mostly just a small cleanup change, even though the actual change is large.
We currently reference content and document objects from one another with `contentID` and `documentID`, but this means that `contentID` must be nullable. Switching to PHIDs allows the column to be non-nullable.
This also supports reorienting some current and future transactions around PHIDs, which is preferable for the API. In particular, I'm adding a "publish version X" transaction soon, and would rather callers pass a PHID than an ID or version number, since this will make the API more consistent and powerful.
Today, `contentID` gets used as a cheaty way to order documents by (content) edit time. Since PHIDs aren't orderable and stuff is going to become actually-revertible soon, replace this with an epoch timestamp.
Test Plan:
- Created, edited, moved, retitled, and deleted Phriction documents.
- Grepped for `documentID` and `contentID`.
- This probably breaks //something// but I'll be in this code for a bit and am likely to catch whatever breaks.
Reviewers: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19619
Summary:
Depends on D19583. Ref T13164. This continues the work of getting rid of `requireCapabilities()`.
This check is valid, but can be a `validateTransactions()` check instead. This is generally more consistent with how other applications work (e.g., creating subprojects).
The UI for this isn't terribly great: you get a policy error //after// you try to create the object. But that's how it worked before, so this isn't any worse than it was. The actual policy exception is (very) slightly more clear now (raised against the right object).
Test Plan:
- Created a child as a user with permission to do so to make sure I didn't break that.
- Set edit permission on `a/` to just me, tried to create `a/b/` as another user, got a policy exception since they can't edit the parent.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19584
Summary:
Depends on D19095. Ref T6203. Ref T13077. This column is nullable in an inconsistent way. Make it non-nullable.
Also clean up one more content query on the history view.
Test Plan: Ran migration, then created and edited documents without providing a descriptino or hitting `NULL` exceptions.
Maniphest Tasks: T13077, T6203
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19096
Summary:
Depends on D19009. Ref T13053. For "Must Encrypt" mail, we must currently strip the "Thread-Topic" header because it sometimes contains sensitive information about the object.
I don't actually know if this header is useful or anyting uses it. My understanding is that it's an Outlook/Exchange thing, but we also implement "Thread-Index" which I think is what Outlook/Exchange actually look at. This header may have done something before we implemented "Thread-Index", or maybe never done anything. Or maybe older versions of Excel/Outlook did something with it and newer versions don't, or do less. So it's possible that an even better fix here would be to simply remove this, but I wasn't able to convince myself of that after Googling for 10 minutes and I don't think it's worth hours of installing Exchange/Outlook to figure out. Instead, I'm just trying to simplify our handling of this header for now, and maybe some day we'll learn more about Exchange/Outlook and can remove it.
In a number of cases we already use the object monogram or PHID as a "Thread-Topic" without users ever complaining, so I think that if this header is useful it probably isn't shown to users, or isn't shown very often (e.g., only in a specific "conversation" sub-view?). Just use the object PHID (which should be unique and stable) as a thread-topic, everywhere, automatically.
Then allow this header through for "Must Encrypt" mail.
Test Plan: Processed some local mail, saw object PHIDs for "Thread-Topic" headers.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13053
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19012
Summary: Noticed a couple of typos in the docs, and then things got out of hand.
Test Plan:
- Stared at the words until my eyes watered and the letters began to swim on the screen.
- Consulted a dictionary.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18693
Summary: Ref T12625
Test Plan: Move a document to a new location, verify the old and new document. Edit both. Grep for MOVE_AWAY
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17988
Summary: Ref T12732. See D17918. With modular transactions, `getCustomTransactionNewValue()` isn't actually called.
Test Plan: Moved document `/x/` to `/y/`, saw document gone at `/x/` instead of copied.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12732
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17963
Summary: I deleted too many lines of code here and TYPE_MOVE was always being applied when CONTENT was set. This should fix on next document save, but should I write some migration tool anyways?
Test Plan: Create a new document, see document with correct status.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17960
Summary: Moves this transaction over to modular transactions.
Test Plan: Move a document, re-title a document, try to move over an existing document.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17918
Summary:
Looks like the logic was there already but some minor parts were missing.
Fixes T8082.
Test Plan:
- Create document `/w/foo`
- Delete document `/w/foo`
- Create document `/w/bar`
- Move document `/w/bar` for `/w/foo`
No error was displayed and document `/w/bar` was moved to `/w/foo`.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8082
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16713
Summary: Ref T992. I noticed that `ManiphestTask` mail doesn't render Remarkup properly (instead, it renders Remarkup literally). I //think// this is because the code calls `addTextSection()` rather than `addRemarkupSection()`.
Test Plan: Created a new Maniphest Task and saw Remarkup in the generated self-email (inspect the email contents with `./bin/mail show-outbound`). I didn't test the other affected applications.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T992
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14511
Summary: Fixes T8524, T8550. These were both missing "subscribers" and Phriction was also the only application with no "other".
Test Plan:
- Project
- set user A to notify only for project subscriber changes
- made a project with user A
- subscribed user B to project
- verified notification sent to user A
- used ./bin/mail to make sure no mail was sent to user A because "This mail has tags which control which users receive it, and this recipient has not elected to receive mail with any of the tags on this message (Settings > Email Preferences)."
- Phriction
- set user A to notify only for phriction document subscriber changes
- made a document with user A
- subscribed user B to document
- verified notification sent to user A
- used ./bin/mail to make sure no mail was sent to user A because "This mail has tags which control which users receive it, and this recipient has not elected to receive mail with any of the tags on this message (Settings > Email Preferences)."
- observed option for "other" in email preferences
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8524, T8550
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13313
Summary: Ref T8455. Instead of using an ad-hoc subscribers effect in Phriction, use the new standard one (introduced previously; this depends on D13178).
Test Plan:
- Wrote an "add subscribers" Herald rule, updated a Phriction document, saw it apply its effect.
- Observed availability of "remove" subscribers actions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8455
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13180
Summary:
Ref T6367. Do all mail, feed, notification and search stuff from the daemons, in all editors.
There are four relatively-stateful editors (Audit, Differential, Phriction, PhortuneCart) which needed special care to move state into the daemons properly.
Beyond that, I moved mailTo/mailCC/feedRelated/feedNotify to be computed before we enter the worker:
- This is simpler, since a lot of editors rely on being able to call `$object->getReviewers()` or similar to compute them.
- This is more correct, since we want to freeze the lists at this moment in time.
Finally, I renamed `loadEdges` to `willPublish` and made it a slightly more general hook.
---
This is a bit fragile and I'm not //thrilled// about it.
It would probably be cleaner to have separate Editor and Publisher classes (something like @fabe's D11329 did). However, I think that's quite a lot of work, and I'd like to see stronger motivation for it (either in this actually being more fragile than I think, or there being other things we get out of it). Overall, I'm comfortable with this change, just definitely not a big fan of the "save" + "load" pattern since I think it's really fragile, nonobvious, hard to debug/predict, etc.
Test Plan:
Directly updated editors:
- Created a new Phriction page, saw "Document Content".
- Edited a Phriction page, saw "Document Diff".
- Edited a revision, got normal looking mail.
- Faked in `changedPriorToCommitURI` and verified it survived the state boundary.
- Sent Audit mail.
- Sent invoice mail.
Indirect editors - for these, I just made a change and made sure the mail generated:
- Updated a paste.
- Updated an event.
- Updated a thread.
- Updated a task.
- Updated a mock.
- Updated a question.
- Updated a project.
- Updated a file.
- Updated an initiative.
- Updated a Legalpad document.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, fabe
Maniphest Tasks: T6367
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13115
Summary:
Fixes T7731. When a user writes a "Send me an email" rule, always try send them an email, even if their notification settings would normally downgrade it to a notification.
In particular, this is stronger than these downgrades:
- Downgrades due to "self actions";
- downgrades due to "mail tags".
Test Plan:
- Wrote various Herald rules with "Send me an email" rules.
- Used `bin/mail list-outbound` / `show-outbound` to vet generated mail.
- Mail reacted properly to a variety of conditions (disabled accounts, settings, "send me an email" rule, forced delivery).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7731
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12300
Summary: These arrays looks a little odd, most likely due to the autofix applied by `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_ARRAY_SEPARATOR`. See D12296 in which I attempt to improve the autocorrection from this linter rule.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12281
Summary: Fixes T7325, T7326, T7328. When you have deleted a document already you have to specify content; this makes this more clear to the user in this specific delete pathway. Also, includes bonus bug fix for T7326 where we weren't moving the title of the wiki page with the rest of the page.
Test Plan: moved a wiki doc and verified it had the title I had specified. tried to delete an already deleted doc via setting the content to blank (i.e. hitting save after making some other edits) and got more clear error UI state
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7328, T7325, T7326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11829
Summary:
Fixes T6651, T6682. Since policy is defined by ancestry, you can't make things outside the core tree.
An alternative fix would be to automagically stub everything in these cases. This has potential negative policy implications - consider making a public document with several levels of depth that automagically stubs out its ancestry as public - and additionally the PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor framework would make this very tricky code (i.e. you are expected to validateTransactions in said hook *and* return an error if things aren't valid and not do some automagic stubbing, etc.)
Test Plan: tried to move a doc from location/that/exists to locationz/thatz/dontz/existz/ and got an error message with links to each missing doc. tried to create a doc at locatonz/thatz/dontz/existsz/ and got an error message with links to each missing doc.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6682, T6651
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10978
Summary: Fixes T6472. I was curious to see how many reports we'd get but we didn't get any I know of... Still, this is a nice convenient link.
Test Plan:
edited a wiki doc title + body. ran /bin/mail to see the body and liked what I saw
```TEXT BODY
btrahan changed the title from "new title is a good thing" to "new title is a good thing asdsadsadsadsada".
btrahan edited the document content.
DOCUMENT DIFF
http://phalanx.dev/phriction/diff/36/?l=3&r=4
DOCUMENT DETAIL
http://phalanx.dev/w/```
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6472
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10850
Summary:
Fixes T5492. I figured this would be easier to just fix than write a guide for; it actually took me an hour, but I spent like 75% of that futzing with my editor.
- The Move controller currently accepts either a slug or an ID. I can't find any callsites which pass a slug, and this doesn't make sense. Pretty sure this was copy/pasted from Edit or something. Only accept IDs.
- Slightly modernize the Move controller (newDialog(), handleRequest(), $viewer).
- When the user enters a bad slug, warn them that we're going to fix it for them and let them accept or reject the changes.
- Don't prefill the edit note (this feels inconsistent/unusual).
- On the form, label the input "Path" instead of "URI".
- Show the old path, to help remind the user what the input should look like.
- When a user tries to do a no-op move, show a more tailored message.
- When the user tries to do an overwriting move, explain how they can fix it.
- When normalizing a slug like `/question/???/mark/`, make it normalize to `/question/_/mark`.
Test Plan:
- Tried to move a document to itself.
- Tried to overwrite a document.
- Did a bad-path move, accepted corrected path.
- Did a good-path move.
- Did a path move with a weird component like `/???/`.
- Added and executed unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5492
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10838
Summary: Fixes T4666, add Herald rules to Phriction Documents
Test Plan: add Herald rule to flag if title contains "xyz", create Phriction Document with title "xyz". Phriction Document should be flagged.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4666
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10830
Summary: ...how do you lock down entire areas otherwise? Fixes T6496.
Test Plan: used user 1 to create x/y that user 2 can't edit. tried to create x/y/z as user 2 and got a big ole error dialogue.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6496
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10819
Summary:
Ref T4029. Fixes T6034.
Various front-end miscellania here. See D10814#96251. This more or less makes policy work but I am not going to call it "fixed" here since we need D10814 to be deployed too and will do that manually.
Test Plan:
- changed document policy from web ui and changes persisted
- changed document policy from web and had form error and changes persisted
- created a structure like users/users/justmyuserpolicy and made sure another user could delete the users/users/ doc
- moved a doc from a to b and verified policy persisted
- verified stub documents inherited policy of the document that stub them...!
- uploaded a file and verified that it 1) had the permissions of the page it was added to and 2) had an "attached" tab linking back to the page on the file page (this means T6034 is fixed with this)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6034, T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10816
Summary: Ref T4029. this diff makes the pertinent database changes AND adds the migration script. This is important to get the data backend straightened away before we fully ship T4029. Next diff will expose the edit controls for these policies and whatever else work is needed to get that part done right.
Test Plan: made sure the lone project page on my wiki had a project with restrictive view policy. Post migration verified correct policy applied to this lone project page AND most open policy applied to the others
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10814
Summary: Ref T4029. Even more code consolidation and cleanup for the long term benefits!
Test Plan: moved a page successfully. tried to move a page to an existing page and got an error. did the two tab trick to try to move a deleted page and got an error.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10812
Summary: Ref T4029. More cleanup and code consolidation for the long terms benefits.
Test Plan: found a document and opened up two browser tabs. Loaded delete dialog on both. Completed delete in one tab and noted document was properly deleted. Tried to complete delete in tab 2 and got an error message.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10809
Summary: Fixes T6489. In an earlier diff I forgot to update the document status itself, thinking that the content update percolated up magically. Restore this functionality so the wiki works better.
Test Plan: deleted a document and observed that i did not get the option to delete it again and it disappeared from document index
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6489
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10807
Summary:
Ref T4029. Some business logic lives outside the editor. This revision moves that logic from the edit controller into the editor proper. This makes re-using that business logic across other endpoints - say like a conduit end point - possible. This is also part of the general modernization quest for phriction I am on.
This diff also restores the functionality where you can delete a document by wiping out the content and saving.
Test Plan: tried to make a document with no title or content and saw errors. opened a document for edit with user 1, then made edits with user 2, then saw an error when i made the edit with user 1. clicking "overwrite changes" then worked. deleted a document by wiping out the body and clicking save.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10795
Summary:
Ref T4029. Long live PhrictionTransactionEditor...! this means that all existing functionality runs 100% through the modern transactions + editor framework. this diff does a few things in sum
- kills the old editor
- moves conduit-based edits to new editor
- moves stubbing out documents to new editor
- deletes moving of wiki docs for projects functionality... (T4021#59511 is a better bigger battle plan here.)
Test Plan: edited a phriction document via conduit and it worked. created a new phriction document /that/was/deep/ and verified ancestral documents were properly stubbed out. changed a project name and noted no wiki page moves.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10792
Summary:
Ref T4029. Much like D10756, D10761 this does the bare minimum to get things in there. I have a sticky with "TODOs" about moving the error-checking business logic into the editor in all three cases.
Up next - policy...
Test Plan: moved a document and it worked! verified no feed story. verified both documents involved looked good
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10763
Summary:
Ref T4029. Much like D10756 this does the bare minimum to get things in there. I have a sticky with "TODOs" about moving the error-checking business logic into the editor in both cases.
Up next - move actions...
Test Plan: deleted a document and it worked! verified proper feed story.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: shadowhand, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10761
Summary: Fixes T6343. Grepped for all callsites and added addLinkSection where needed.
Test Plan: Tested Differential, Maniphest, Conpherence, Ponder and Macro. Inspect HTML mail for anchor tags. Inspect text mails for non-disruption.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: talshiri, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10762
Summary:
This implements as little as possible to stick a working transactions + editor codepath in the basic create / edit flow. Aside from the transaction tables, this also required adding a mailKey to a phrictionDocument.
Future work would include adding more transactions types for things like "move" and all the pertinent support. Even future work is to add things like policies which will work easily in the transaction framework. Ref T4029.
Test Plan:
- made a wiki doc
- edit a wiki doc
- had someone subscribe to a wiki doc and edited it
For all three, the edits worked, a reasonable email was sent out, and feed stories were generated.
- made a wiki doc at a /location/like/this
document "stubs" were made as expected in /location and /location/like
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10756
Summary: pre-patch, these fatal, since we overwrite $content to be just a string so methods fail later in the code. Instead, write a $content_str to keep $content as the proper data.
Test Plan: editing a document and on save it showed me the view page! (as opposed to fataling and staying on the eidt page)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10426
Summary: Ref T3307. Only one I thought was tricky was Excel; I went with bytes there like it was email.
Test Plan: played around on a few endpoints but mostly thought carefully
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3307
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10392
Summary: I'm pretty sure that `@group` annotations are useless now... see D9855. Also fixed various other minor issues.
Test Plan: Eye-ball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9859
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rP, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.
Test Plan: Eyeballed it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9431
Summary: Ref T4029. We use a lot of very outdated content loading in Phriction, which blocks T4029.
Test Plan:
- Called phriction.info
- Called phriction.history
- Called phriction.edit
- Viewed document list.
- Deleted a document.
- Viewed history.
- Viewed a diff.
- Created a document.
- Edited a document.
- Moved a document.
- Tried to overwrite a document with "new".
- Tried to overwrite a document with "move".
- Viewed a moved document note.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: shadowhand, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9194
Summary: Fixes T3857. Earlier work made this trivial and just left product questions, which I've answered by requiring the daemons to run on reasonable installs.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/search index` and `bin/search index --background`. Observed indexes write in the former case and tasks queue in the latter case. Commented with a unique string on a revision and searched for it a moment later, got exactly one result (that revision), verifying that reindexing works correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3857
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7966
Summary:
we were just checking if projects/ was in the URI before barfing. Use some more fun utility functions such that we only complain if there is no project.
Fixes T4071.
Test Plan: made a subpage under a project - success! tried to make a project wiki page where there was no project - successful failure! tried to make a project wiki sub page where there was no project - successful failure!
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4071
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7527
Summary: This adds pht's and such english to Phriction email body.
Test Plan: Edited a Document, Moved a Document. Got new emails. Such Wow.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7477
Summary:
Fixes T2900 - Display link to document version and diff for edited Phriction Documents.
Also display the target document for moved pages.
Test Plan: Edited/Moved some pages, verified that the links are linking to the correct versions.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: adityar7, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2900
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5615
