Summary:
Ref T4371. Ref T4699. Fixes T3994.
Currently, we're very conservative about sending errors back to users. A concern I had about this was that mistakes could lead to email loops, massive amounts of email spam, etc. Because of this, I was pretty hesitant about replying to email with more email when I wrote this stuff.
However, this was a long time ago. We now have Message-ID deduplication, "X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Mail", generally better mail infrastructure, and rate limiting. Together, these mechanisms should reasonably prevent anything crazy (primarily, infinite email loops) from happening.
Thus:
- When we hit any processing error after receiving a mail, try to send the author a reply with details about what went wrong. These are limited to 6 per hour per address.
- Rewrite most of the errors to be more detailed and informative.
- Rewrite most of the errors in a user-facing voice ("You sent this mail..." instead of "This mail was sent..").
- Remove the redundant, less sophisticated code which does something similar in Differential.
Test Plan:
- Using `scripts/mail/mail_receiver.php`, artificially received a pile of mail.
- Hit a bunch of different errors.
- Saw reasonable error mail get sent to me.
- Saw other reasonable error mail get rate limited.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3994, T4371, T4699
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8692
Summary:
When sending the "Reply-To" header to Mailgun, Phabricator would
previously send two headers for every "Reply-To": "Reply-To[0][email]" and
"Reply-To[0][name]". Instead, explicitly build the header as specified by RFC
2822 and send it to Mailgun pre-baked.
Pretty sure this bug was a cargo-cult from the Sendgrid code, where (apparently)
this actually works.
Test Plan:
Triggered an email from Phabricator, saw that the header was sent
properly.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8645
Summary:
Ref T2222. Brings the major mail features (affected files, patches) forward.
This drops some of the minor integrations which just show object state (like "Maniphest Tasks") since I think they're not very important. I'll put them back if users miss them.
Test Plan: Sent mail with inline/attached patches.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8459
Summary:
There are quite a few tests in Arcanist, libphutil and Phabricator that do something similar to `$this->assertEqual(false, ...)` or `$this->assertEqual(true, ...)`.
This is unnecessarily verbose and it would be cleaner if we had `assertFalse` and `assertTrue` methods.
Test Plan: I contemplated adding a unit test for the `getCallerInfo` method but wasn't sure if it was required / where it should live.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8460
Summary: Ref T2222. When we discover a commit associated with a revision, close it using modern transactions.
Test Plan: {F123848}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8441
Summary:
Ref T2222. Ref T4484. This is a stepping stone to getting Herald supported in the new Differental code. Generally:
- Instead of an Editor either supporting or not supporting Herald, let it choose based on transactions. Specifically, Differential only runs rules on revision creation and diff updates.
- Optionally, allow an Editor to return some transactions to apply instead of having to apply everything itself. This lets us make it clear why changes happend in the transaction log, and share more code.
- I updated only one transaction type (owners in Maniphest) since it was the easiest and cleanest to update and test. Everything else still works like it used to, it just won't generate a transaction record yet.
- The transaction records are a touch rough, but we can clean them up later.
Test Plan: {F122282}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4484, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8404
Summary:
Ref T2222.
- Restore mail tags for ApplicationTransactions mail.
- Restore subject line verbs.
- Denormalize line count and repository PHID.
- Fix an issue with the mailgun adapter where headers weren't attached properly.
Test Plan: Sent some mail, verified it had correct subjects and tags.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8378
Summary:
Fixes T4379. Several changes:
- Migrate all project members into subscribers.
- When members are added or removed, subscribe or unsubscribe them.
- Show sub/unsub in the UI.
- Determine mailable membership of projects by querying subscribers.
Test Plan:
- As `duck`, joined a project.
- Added the project as a reviewer to a revision.
- Commented on the revision.
- Observed `duck` receive mail.
- Unsubscribed as `duck`.
- Observed no mail.
- Resubscribed as `duck`.
- Mail again.
- Joined/left project, checked sub/unsub status.
- Ran migration, looked at database.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, asherkin
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8189
Summary: Ref T4368. We don't currently GC these tables, and the sent mail table is one of the largest on `secure.phabricator.com`. There's no value in retaining this information indefinitely. Instead, retain it for 90 days, which should be plenty of time to debug/diagnose any issues.
Test Plan: Ran `phd debug garbage`, saw it clean up a reasonable amount of data from these tables.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4368
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8127
Summary:
Ref T4361. Before we figure out which To/CC are addressable, try to expand To/CC. Specifically, the supported expansion right now is project PHIDs expanding to all their members.
Because of the way multiplexing works, we have to do this in two places: explicitly in `multiplexMail()`, and when sending mail that wasn't multiplexed. This is messy; eventually we can get rid of it (after ApplicationTransactions are everywhere).
This has some rough edges, but should basically give us what we need to make stuff like projects mailable. Particularly, it deals with most issues in D7436:
- I got around the resolution/multiplexing issue by resolving aggregate mailables separately from mailable actors.
- We get to keep the Project PHID as a To/CC/Reviewer/Whatever until the last second.
- Users won't get two emails for being a CC and also a member of a CC'd project.
- We can degrade to the list stuff this way if we want, by having the project aggregate yield a single list PHID.
Test Plan: Added a comment to a revision with a project reviewer, got mail to all the project's members.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4361
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8117
Summary:
Fixes T4202. We have old code in MetaMTA which implements gradual backoff and maximum retries.
However, we have more general code in the task queue which does this, too. We can just use the more general stuff in the task queue; it obsoletes the specific stuff in MetaMTA, which is more complex and ran into some kind of issue in T4202.
Remove `retryCount`, `nextRetry` (obsoleted by task queue retry mechanisms) and "simulated failures" (no longer in use).
Generally, modern infrastructure has replaced these mechanisms with more general ones.
Test Plan:
- Sent mail.
- Observed unsendable mail failing in reasonable ways in the queue.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4202
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8115
Summary:
As you've suggested, I took the SendGrid code and massaged it until it played nice with Mailgun.
btw - unless I'm missing something, it appears that the SendGrid receiver lets you spoof emails (it performs no validation on the data received).
Test Plan: Opened a task with Mailgun. Felt great.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4326
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7989
Summary: Adds "verified" and "secretKey" to Legalpad document signatures. For logged in users using an email address they own, things are verified right away. Otherwise, the email is sent a verification letter. When the user clicks the link the signature is marked verified.
Test Plan: signed the document with a bogus email address not logged in. verified the email that would be sent looked good from command line. followed link and successfully verified bogus email address
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran, asherkin
Maniphest Tasks: T4283
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7930
Summary:
Ref T3857.
- Always send mail via daemons. This lets us get rid of this config, and is generally much more performant.
- After D7964, we warn if daemons aren't running.
Test Plan: Sent some mail.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3857
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7965
Summary:
Ref T2015. Not directly related to Drydock, but I bumped into this. All these scripts currently enumerate their workflows explicitly.
Instead, use `PhutilSymbolLoader` to automatically discover workflows. This reduces code duplication and errors (see all the bad `extends` this diff fixes) and lets third parties add new workflows (not clearly valuable?).
Test Plan: Ran `bin/x help` for each modified script.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2015
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7840
Summary:
Ref T2015. Not directly related to Drydock, but I've wanted to do this for a bit.
Introduce a common base class for all the workflows in the scripts in `bin/*`. This slightly reduces code duplication by moving `isExecutable()` to the base, but also provides `getViewer()`. This is a little nicer than `PhabricatorUser::getOmnipotentUser()` and gives us a layer of indirection if we ever want to introduce more general viewer mechanisms in scripts.
Test Plan: Lint; ran some of the scripts.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2015
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7838
Summary:
Fixes two issues:
- When rendering a task's details, we currently issue a policy-oblivious query. Instead, issue a policy-aware query.
- The formatting is a little bit weird, with the top half in a box and the bottom half with an older style. Make them consistent.
Test Plan: Looked at the detail pages for several tasks in queue.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7812
Summary: Until we implement an "enum" type for config, make this a bit harder to get wrong. A user entered "TLS", but the correct value is "tls". The documentation is consistent about this, but the behavior is sitll surprsing.
Test Plan: eyeballed it
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7778
Summary:
A user sent a message to Phabricator which looked like:
On blah blah blah ?
On <date>, <user> wrote:
> blah blah blah
The current algorithm is too aggressive and thinks lines 1-3 are //all// the "On ... wrote:" string. Instead, patch only the most recent "On".
Test Plan: Added a failing test and made it pass.
Reviewers: btrahan, zeeg
Reviewed By: zeeg
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7732
Summary:
Ref T4039. This is mostly to deal with that, to prevent the security issues associated with mutable local paths. The next diff will lock them in the web UI.
I also added a confirmation prompt to `bin/repository delete`, which was a little scary without one.
See one comment inline about the `--as` flag. I don't love this, but when I started adding all the stuff we'd need to let this transaction show up as "Administrator" it quickly got pretty big.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/repository edit ...`, saw an edit with a transaction show up on the web UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7579
Summary:
Mailbox sometimes (?) changes the case of the email address (?). Be more liberal in what we accept.
Also fix a minor output bug.
Test Plan: Sent mail to `e1+...` instead of `E1+...`, verified it arrived.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7575
Summary:
Small step forward which improves existing stuff or lays groudwork for future stuff:
- Currently, to check for email verification, we have to single-query the email address on every page. Instead, denoramlize it into the user object.
- Migrate all the existing users.
- When the user verifies an email, mark them as `isEmailVerified` if the email is their primary email.
- Just make the checks look at the `isEmailVerified` field.
- Add a new check, `isUserActivated()`, to cover email-verified plus disabled. Currently, a non-verified-but-not-disabled user could theoretically use Conduit over SSH, if anyone deployed it. Tighten that up.
- Add an `isApproved` flag, which is always true for now. In a future diff, I want to add a default-on admin approval queue for new accounts, to prevent configuration mistakes. The way it will work is:
- When the queue is enabled, registering users are created with `isApproved = false`.
- Admins are sent an email, "[Phabricator] New User Approval (alincoln)", telling them that a new user is waiting for approval.
- They go to the web UI and approve the user.
- Manually-created accounts are auto-approved.
- The email will have instructions for disabling the queue.
I think this queue will be helpful for new installs and give them peace of mind, and when you go to disable it we have a better opportunity to warn you about exactly what that means.
Generally, I want to improve the default safety of registration, since if you just blindly coast through the path of least resistance right now your install ends up pretty open, and realistically few installs are on VPNs.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration, verified `isEmailVerified` populated correctly.
- Created a new user, checked DB for verified (not verified).
- Verified, checked DB (now verified).
- Used Conduit, People, Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7572
Summary: See @scottmac's reply in T3982. It looks like his email client uses the standard quote string, but includes it in the quoted block.
Test Plan: Added a failing unit test, made it pass.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: scottmac, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7440
Summary: Fixes T4001. I broke this some time ago and no one has complained. I don't think it gets much use, and we haven't added it for the newer apps. Just get rid of it rather than adapt the URIs for ApplicationSearch.
Test Plan: Unit tests, sent myself some email.
Reviewers: zeeg, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4001
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7355
Summary:
also try to centralize some of the command parsing logic. note that differential is still an exception here. it uses a whitelist-style regex. i think long-term we should have this for every app but changing it seemed too big for this diff.
Fixes T3937.
Test Plan:
echo '!assign btrahan' | ./bin/mail receive-test --as xerxes --to T22 ; echo '!claim' | ./bin/mail receive-test --as xerxes --to T22
unit tests passed, though my new one is silly
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3937
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7307
Summary:
we filter the $actors above such that its possible to have no $actor anymore (if $actor is not a deliverable email address). ergo, make sure we have actor before we start calling methods.
Fixes github issue 403
Test Plan: logic on this one - not 100% sure how to easily reproduce
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7284
Summary: Ref T603. Allow global default policies to be configured for tasks.
Test Plan:
- Created task via web UI.
- Created task via Conduit.
- Created task via email.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7267
Summary: Ref T603. Swaps out most `PhabricatorFile` loads for `PhabricatorFileQuery`.
Test Plan:
- Viewed Differential changesets.
- Used `file.info`.
- Used `file.download`.
- Viewed a file.
- Deleted a file.
- Used `/Fnnnn` to access a file.
- Uploaded an image, verified a thumbnail generated.
- Created and edited a macro.
- Added a meme.
- Did old-school attach-a-file-to-a-task.
- Viewed a paste.
- Viewed a mock.
- Embedded a mock.
- Profiled a page.
- Parsed a commit with image files linked to a revision with image files.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7178
Summary: ...and deploy on Maniphest. Ref T1638.
Test Plan: created a herald rule to be cc'd for tasks created via web. made a task via web and another via email and was cc'd appropriately. edited the herald to be cc'd for tasks created via not web. made 2 tasks again and got cc'd appropriately
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1638
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7145
Summary:
Ref T2217. Fixes two issues:
# The "task created" email didn't include the task description, but should.
# We were treaging the "status" event as the "create", but that's kind of a mess. Treat the "title" event as the "create" instead. This makes initial emails say "[Created]".
Test Plan: Created some tasks, got better emails.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7115
Summary: Ref T603. Killing this class is cool because the classes that replace it are policy-aware. Tried to keep my wits about me as I did this and fixed a few random things along the way. (Ones I remember right now are pulling a query outside of a foreach loop in Releeph and fixing the text in UIExample to note that the ace of hearts if "a powerful" card and not the "most powerful" card (Q of spades gets that honor IMO))
Test Plan: tested the first few changes (execute, executeOne X handle, object) then got real mechanical / careful with the other changes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran, FacebookPOC
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6941
Summary: Currently, adapters can only fail mail temporarily. Allow them to indicate a permanent failure by throwing a special exception.
Test Plan: Added and ran unit tests.
Reviewers: wez, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6847
Summary: Missed this when moving most MetaMTA responsibilities to the CLI. Show the correct command to get data rather than linking to a 404.
Test Plan: {F56733}
Reviewers: wez, btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6846
Summary: Ref T2715. Had to start loading status information in the query class. Debated trying to clean up some of the attach / load stuff but decided to just add status under the new paradigm for now.
Test Plan: phid.query also made a status and checked that out. also played in conpherence.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2715
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6585
Summary:
Move comments from the old table to ApplicationTransactions. Patch dances around which objects it uses since I intend to delete the comment table.
NOTE: This temporarily disables comment writes. I'll restore them shortly.
Test Plan: {F50166}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6454
Summary: Fixes T3528. We won't be able to load the user if they've been deleted, and will fatal a few lines later on `$user->getID()`.
Test Plan: I'm going with my gut on this one.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3528
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6442
Summary:
Ref T3306. This interface has a hard time balancing security/policy issues and I'm not sure what the best way forward is. Some possibilities:
# We just let you see everything from the web UI.
- This makes debugging easier.
- Anyone who can see this stuff can trivially take over any user's account with five seconds of work and no technical expertise (reset their password from the web UI, then go read the email and click the link).
# We let you see everything, but only for messages you were a recipient of or author of.
- This makes it much more difficult to debug issues with mailing lists.
- But maybe we could just say mailing list recipients are "public", or define some other ruleset.
- Generally this gets privacy and ease of use right.
# We could move the whole thing to the CLI.
- Makes the UI/UX way worse.
# We could strike an awkward balance between concerns, as we do now.
- We expose //who// sent and received messages, but not the content of the messages. This doesn't feel great.
I'm inclined to probably go with (2) and figure something out for mailing lists?
Anyway, irrespective of that this should generally make things more clear, and improves the code a lot if nothing else.
Test Plan:
{F49546}
- Looked at a bunch of mail.
- Sent mail from different apps.
- Checked that recipients seem correct.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3306
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6413
Summary: Ref T3306. I'm going to add more information about To/Cc here, but here's a little cleanup first.
Test Plan: {F49524}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3306
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6410
Summary:
Ref T3306. Moves this from the web to the CLI, which is a tiny bit clunkier but way better as far as policies go and more repeatable for development.
See discussion in D6413.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/mail receive-test`, verified mail was received. Used and abused various options.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3306
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6417
Summary:
Ref T1536. This is the schema code for `PhabricatorExternalAccount` which was previously in D4647. I'm splitting it out so I can put it earlier in the sequence and because it's simple and standalone.
Expands `PhabricatorExternalAccount` to have everything we need for the rest of registration.
Test Plan: Implemented the remainder of new registration on top of this.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6169
Summary: At the global level, truncate emails at a user-configured size.
Test Plan: Untested, as I could not get PHP to send emails on my box, but if you can this should be very easy to test. Just set the max size to something like .001 kilobytes and make sure it does the right thing.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T1392
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6118
Summary:
Ref T2625. Fixes T2812. Implement ApplicationSearch in People.
{F44788}
Test Plan: Made People queries. Used Conduit. Used `@mentions`.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625, T2812
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6092
Summary: Ref T3166. I moved the create logic into a static method in the editor class to keep things tidy.
Test Plan: created a conpherence from UI. purdy. tried errors and got UI to show "required". for conduit, created a thread with all the bells and whistles and it worked. verified i got proper exceptions with bum conduit calls
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3166
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6083
Summary: I introduced this helper at some point, clean up all the code duplication around content sources.
Test Plan: Grepped; hit edit interfaces for most/all of these.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, edward
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6030
Summary:
Ref T3217. @hlau has an email client which quotes text with:
________________________________________
From: ...
Add a regular expression to correctly detect this as quoted body text.
Test Plan: Add unit test; executed unit test.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: hlau, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5986
Summary: We can't show this stuff on the web UI because it has password reset links and private reply-to addresses, but we can provide easier CLI tools than "root around in the database". Land a rough version of `bin/mail show-inbound` and `bin/mail show-outbound`.
Test Plan: Used both commands to examine mail from the CLI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: tido, euresti, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5963
Summary:
Moves all remaining mail handling into ReplyHandlers.
Farewell, `getPhabricatorToInformation()`! You were a bad method and no one liked you.
Ref T1205.
Test Plan:
- Used test console to send mail to Revisions, Tasks, Conpherences and Commits (these all actually work).
- Used test console to send mail to Requests, Macros, Questions and Mocks (these accept the mail but don't do anything with it, but didn't do anything before either).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5953
Summary: Ref T1205. Moves the handling logic for these email types to reply handlers.
Test Plan: Used test form to send conpherence and maniphest mail.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5945
Summary: Currently this is fairly hard-coded. Instead, make it use available receivers. Ref T1205.
Test Plan: Used mail form to send mail to various objects (Dnn, Tnn, Cnn, etc.). Only some of these work right now because the receiver thing still hard-codes a bunch of junk.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5944
Summary:
Ref T1205. Finally able to delete a big chunk of this nastiness.
Make MailReceivers responsible for validating senders. For object creation receivers (bugs, conpherences) this just means that users must not be disabled. For other receivers the senders must be able to see the objects, have the right hashes, etc., according to policy.
Test Plan: Added a bunch of test cases (everything except policy). Verified behavior via the Receive test console.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5943
Summary: Copies sender identification logic into MailReceivers and makes it basically sane. The mess we run into after this try/catch is terrifying so I'm avoiding actually getting rid of any of it quite yet. Ref T1205.
Test Plan: Added a bit of test coverage. Used Receiver test console to verify some additional behaviors.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: Afaque_Hussain, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5931
Summary: Adding Email reply support for external users.
Test Plan: Please let me know if I have approached it correctly. Had few doubts. Will proceed after your comments :)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan, jennis.mekwan3
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5912
Summary: Ref T3183. We should accept addresses like `"New Bug" <bugs@example.com>` to match `bugs@example.com`.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3183
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5923
Summary:
Ref T1205. Continuation of D5915.
Currently, `PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMail` has //all// the logic for routing mail. In particular:
- New mail receivers in applications must edit it.
- Mail receivers don't drop out when applications are uninstalled.
Applications have some logic in subclasses of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler`, but this class is a bit of a mess. It is also heavily based on the assumption that mail receivers are objects (like revisions), but this is not true in at least two cases today (creating new tasks with `bugs@`, creating a new Conpherence thread) and likely other cases in the future (e.g., revision-by-mail).
Move this logic into a new `PhabricatorMailReceiver` classtree. This is similar to `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` but a bit cleaner and more general. I plan to heavily reduce the responsibilities of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` or possibly eliminate it entirely.
For now, the new classtree doesn't do much of interest. The only behavioral change this diff causes is that Phabricator will now reject mail to an application when that application is uninstalled.
I also moved all the `ReplyHandler` classes into `mail/` directories in their respective applications.
Test Plan: Unit tests, used receive test to route mail to various objects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: Afaque_Hussain, edward, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5922
Summary:
We/I broke a couple of things here recently (see D5911) and are doing some work here in general (see D5912, etc.).
Generally, this code is pretty oldschool and not especially well architected for modern application-oriented Phabricator. It hardcodes a lot of stuff which should be applications' responsibilites.
Take the first steps toward making it more solid to reduce the risk here. In particular:
- Factor out the "self mail" and "duplicate mail" checks and add unit tests.
- Make Message-ID hash handling automatic.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5915
Summary:
Fixes T3181.
- Inbound `bugs@` mail is broken right now if it doesn't use the new external user stuff, because it calls `$user->getPhabricatorUser()` on an object which is already a `PhabricatorUser`. Instead, build the right `$user` object from the external user earlier on.
- Maniphest mail is nuking or otherwise awkwardly altering CCs. Make this work properly.
- Make sure "!unsubscribe" works correctly.
Test Plan: Sent `bugs@` mail. Sent CC mail. Sent "!unsubscribe" mail.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, tido
Maniphest Tasks: T3181
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5911
Summary: Maniphest sends email to External users.
Test Plan:
{F42649}
It seems that maniphest tries to send an email, my install is not configured to deliver email.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5856
Summary: Added PHID_TYPE_XUSR to loadObjectsofType() of PhabricatorObjectHandle data. Was trying to solve the setActor() issue. Created a getPhabricator method in PhabricatorExternalAccount. When I try to set authorPHID using setAuthorPHID() in PhabricatorExternalAccount it's saying bad setter call, if I don't, then it's saying authorPHID can't be null. Sending you diff for comments on this.
Test Plan:
{F42523}
{F42525}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5839
Summary: Using PhabricatorExternalAccount in place maniphest.default-public-author.
Test Plan:
Using receivemail to see if the a new entry is made in the 'phabircator_user.user_externalaccount' table. Few things, I noticed that phabricator creates table 'user_externalaccout'. And now it throws up error 'Unknown column 'dateCreated' in 'field list''. Awaiting your comments.
{F41370}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5747
Summary: Similar to title. I tried to test as specified. I thought I had to configure inbound and outbound mail. I had installed lamson too :O. when it started to become complicated I asked you :P. Please have a look at the code and let me know where I am going wrong or have understood correctly or not :)
Test Plan: Send an email using /mail/recieve/ form to an email id pointed to by maniphest.public-create-email and see if creates a maniphest task.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5681
Summary:
This sets more reasonable values for the object handle fields imo. It's not like I ever want to find out what letter to use and then do `substr($handle->getType(), 0, 1).$handle->getID()` to get `D1` each time I use handles.
Name:
- D1
- T1
- M1
- P1
- etc.
Fullname:
- D1: Something
- T1: Something
- etc.
In addition, this helps me to reasonable prefill Hovercards in case there is no application-specific event listener.
Also deletes `title` and `alternateID` completely. They deserved that.
Test Plan:
Visited places, nothing broke (We only ever used `$handle->getName()` for users and commits).
Tested mail reply handler. Did not test the other way around, but should be fine.
Hovercards broken until D5572 (would love to induce a cyclic dependency)
Reviewers: epriestley, chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5571
Summary:
Fixes T2458. Ref T2843. @tido's email from T2843 has exhausted its retries and failed, but we want to try it again with the patch from D5464 to capture the actual error. This sort of thing has come up a few times in debugging, too.
Also fixed some stuff that came up while debugging this.
Test Plan:
- Ran command with no args.
- Ran resend with no args.
- Ran resend with bad IDs.
- Ran resend with already-queued messages, got "already queued" error.
- Ran resend with already-sent message, got requeue.
Reviewers: btrahan, tido
Reviewed By: tido
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2458, T2843
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5493
Summary:
Fixes T2797
Currently, emails are sent in no case to the actor if he has disabled the preference to send emails for his own actions. This won't let us send any test emails from the MetaMTA application to ourselves.
This revision corrects the latter by specifically overriding the option for test emails.
Test Plan:
tried to send emails to myself. verified test mail got blocked with change not applied.
applied the change. verified new change with both preference enabled and disabled did work fine.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: kai, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2797
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5398
Summary:
Unmuck almost all of the we-sort-of-have-viewers-some-of-the-time mess.
There are a few notable cases here:
- I used Omnipotent users when indexing objects for search. I think this is correct; we do policy filtering when showing results.
- I cheated in a bad way in the Remarkup object rule, but fixing this requires fixing all the PhabricatorRemarkupEngine callsites (there are 85). I'll do that in the next diff.
- I cheated in a few random places, like when sending mail about package edits. These aren't a big deal.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for all PhabricatorObjectHandleData references.
- Gave them viewers.
Reviewers: vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, edward
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5151
Summary: Mostly applies a new call spacing rule; also a few things that have slipped through via pull requests and such
Test Plan: `find src/ -type f -name '*.php' | xargs -n16 arc lint --output summary --apply-patches`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5002
Summary:
Lots of killed `phutil_escape_html()`.
Done by searching for `AphrontTableView` and then `$rows` (usually) backwards.
Test Plan:
Looked at homepage.
echo id(new AphrontTableView(array(array('<'))))->render();
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4884
Summary: Searched for `AphrontFormView` and then for `appendChild()`.
Test Plan: /login/
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2432
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4855
Summary: Done by searching for `AphrontErrorView` and then `appendChild()`.
Test Plan:
Looked at Commit Detail.
Looked at Revision Detail.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2432
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4843
Summary: I'm not super happy with the prettiness of the code, but I wasn't able to come up with a good way to clean it up. Happy for suggestions.
Test Plan: sent message to btrahan@phabricator.dev from gmail. Copied raw email and piped it to mail_handler.php -- it created a conpherence! Repeated but sent to btrahan and xerxes and noted that the conpherence was created for both users
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2431
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4854
Summary: Created Applications application which allows uninstallation & installation of application.
Test Plan: In "Applications" application, clicked on uninstalled the application by cliking Uninstall and chekcing whether they are really uninstalled(Disabling URI & in appearance in the side pane). Then Clicked on the install button of the uninstalled application to check whether they are installed.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4715
Summary: Added phts, tested forms on mobile.
Test Plan: Review each page in Chrome and iOS.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4702
Summary: unifies the code and presentation between adding files via email and web. Also makes it possible to "attach" the same file multiple times, either by just talking about it in the different messages or multiple times in the same message.
Test Plan: sent message with attachment - it worked! sent a message referencing previous attachment - it work! sent a message with the same attachment in it like 12 times - it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2399
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4679
Summary:
Most mail comes in through the script, but we can also generate it with the test controller or the SendGrid receiver.
In these cases, we produce a `null` message hash ID, which fails on inserts into MySQL databases configured in strict mode.
Instead, correctly generate the hash ID in these cases (for tests, make one up).
Test Plan: Generated test mail. (I'll see if @sokcevic can test SendGrid).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: sokcevic, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2423
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4667
Summary: the editor methods are protected so just build a reply handler directly
Test Plan: push it live and try again
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2399
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4670
Summary: it doesn't work right now. updating this regex should fix it methinks
Test Plan: gotta push it live
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2399
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4663
Summary: Fixes various array_combine() warnings for PHP < 5.4
Test Plan: lint/unit/grep
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4660
Summary: Added a reply handler. A few problems -- first, I can't seem to get this to actually send me email so I haven't been able to reply (which I would have done by generating a reply, then copying the raw email into scripts/mail_handler.php). Second, the subject is often terrible on these emails -- unless the conpherence is named its something gross like "E4:" Third, on create I am noticing an error on array_combine() which I think is related to the need to write array_combine_not_broken or what have you I saw go by... (PhabricatorTransactionEditor does array_combine(xaction->getOldValue(), xaction->getOldValue()) and complains that the arrays are empty)
Test Plan: noted that /mail/ said mails were being sent
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2399
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4656
Summary: was doing some work in here and noticed this old crap lying around. T547 was last updated in December 2011 so I think its okay to delete these old mail hashes now.
Test Plan: careful code inspection, though I will be testing mail like whoa for the rest of the day probably
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T547
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4650
Summary:
Created with spatch:
lang=diff
- phutil_render_tag
+ phutil_tag
(X, Y, '...')
Then searched for `&` and `<` in the output and replaced them.
Test Plan: Loaded homepage.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4503
Summary:
T2345
getConfig throws an Exception when the key does not exist.
Also removes dead code that throws an Exception.
Test Plan:
Reloaded the Phabricator home page. In the process, found
2 Exceptions thrown due to nonexistent keys. After addressing these problems,
the home page loads without Exceptions.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4541
Summary: This removes all calls to addSpacer and the method. We were applying it inconsistently and it was causing spacing issues with redesigning the sidenav. My feeling is we can recreate the space in CSS if the design dictates, which would apply it consistently.
Test Plan: Go to Applications, click on every application.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4420
Summary:
Fixes T2290. Older versions of PHP (prior to PHP 5.4) raised a warning if you tried to combine empty arrays. (Newer versions don't, which is why I missed this in testing, although I may also not have tried sending empty mail.)
If mail has no recipients, we reach this with an empty array. Just skip the function body and return immediately, the result is empty array.
(You can get mail with no recipients in various valid ways, currently by, e.g., commenting on a Macro with no subscribers.)
Test Plan: Sent mail with zero, nonzero recipients. Received the nonzero recipient mail. Verified on php.net that this is a version issue.
Reviewers: codeblock, btrahan
Reviewed By: codeblock
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2290
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4360
