Summary:
Allow installs to require users to verify email addresses before they can use Phabricator. If a user logs in without a verified email address, they're given instructions to verify their address.
This isn't too useful on its own since we don't actually have arbitrary email registration, but the next step is to allow installs to restrict email to only some domains (e.g., @mycompany.com).
Test Plan:
- Verification
- Set verification requirement to `true`.
- Tried to use Phabricator with an unverified account, was told to verify.
- Tried to use Conduit, was given a verification error.
- Verified account, used Phabricator.
- Unverified account, reset password, verified implicit verification, used Phabricator.
- People Admin Interface
- Viewed as admin. Clicked "Administrate User".
- Viewed as non-admin
- Sanity Checks
- Used Conduit normally from web/CLI with a verified account.
- Logged in/out.
- Sent password reset email.
- Created a new user.
- Logged in with an unverified user but with the configuration set to off.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, csilvers
Maniphest Tasks: T1184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2520
Summary:
Sorting by last commit date
Branch view limit to 25 branches
All branches table page with pagination on Git
Test Plan:
* Check repository view for expected behavior on branch table view
* Check all branches page & test pagination
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1200
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2442
Summary:
- Move email to a separate table.
- Migrate existing email to new storage.
- Allow users to add and remove email addresses.
- Allow users to verify email addresses.
- Allow users to change their primary email address.
- Convert all the registration/reset/login code to understand these changes.
- There are a few security considerations here but I think I've addressed them. Principally, it is important to never let a user acquire a verified email address they don't actually own. We ensure this by tightening the scoping of token generation rules to be (user, email) specific.
- This should have essentially zero impact on Facebook, but may require some minor changes in the registration code -- I don't exactly remember how it is set up.
Not included here (next steps):
- Allow configuration to restrict email to certain domains.
- Allow configuration to require validated email.
Test Plan:
This is a fairly extensive, difficult-to-test change.
- From "Email Addresses" interface:
- Added new email (verified email verifications sent).
- Changed primary email (verified old/new notificactions sent).
- Resent verification emails (verified they sent).
- Removed email.
- Tried to add already-owned email.
- Created new users with "accountadmin". Edited existing users with "accountadmin".
- Created new users with "add_user.php".
- Created new users with web interface.
- Clicked welcome email link, verified it verified email.
- Reset password.
- Linked/unlinked oauth accounts.
- Logged in with oauth account.
- Logged in with email.
- Registered with Oauth account.
- Tried to register with OAuth account with duplicate email.
- Verified errors for email verification with bad tokens, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2393
Summary:
- When a user uploads an oversized file, throw an exception.
- When an uncaught exception occurs during a Conduit request, return a Conduit response.
- When an uncaught exception occurs during a non-workflow Ajax request, return an Ajax response.
Test Plan:
- Uploaded overlarge files.
- Hit an exception page with ?__ajax__=1 and ?__conduit__=1
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T875, T788
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2385
Summary:
I wanted to point someone on a file uploaded to Phabricator and the normal link is just too long.
I guess that this also improves security. Because pointing someone to the file directly reveals the secret key used in /data/ and it can be served without auth?
We already use `{F123}` so there will be no conflicts in future because we wouldn't want to reuse it for something else.
I promote the link on /file/ - it adds one redirect but I think it's worth it. I also considered making the link from the File ID column but there are already too many links (with some duplicity).
Test Plan:
/file/
/F123 (redirect)
/F9999999999 (404)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2380
Summary:
This is mostly intended to simplify D2323.
We currently allow users to edit and customize the links on the homepage, but as far as I know no one actually does this (no one complained when we redid the homepage earlier this year) and it creates a lot of mess in the database patches and quickstart dump. After D2331, this is the only data we load in the patch files. The patch files are also a mess with respect to this data and have various different versions of it.
Also the current UI is just kind of bad, it stretches stuff across too many screens and is generally ungood. Nuking this lets us nuke a lot of code in general.
(In the long term, I think we'll move toward an "application" model anyway, and this stuff will go away sooner or later.)
I'll add a drop-database patch some time later, just in case anyone does actually use this, so they can get their data out of MySQL.
Test Plan: Looked at home page, clicked "More Stuff", got a single list of other apps/things.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, edward, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T345
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2332
Summary:
Also couple of small changes:
- Add method name to title.
- 404 for /conduit/method/x/.
- Remove utilities from side panel.
- Remove side panel from log.
Test Plan:
/conduit/
/conduit/method/x/
/conduit/method/user.whoami/
/conduit/log/
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2326
Summary:
- When viewing a commit, show its tags.
- For commits with many tags, show a list of all tags on the tag list interface.
- Improve some handling of symbolic references.
- When tags contain content, show it on the browse view reached by clicking the tag name.
Test Plan: Looked at commits with and without tags, clicked "More tags...", clicked tag names.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, davidreuss, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1130
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2290
Summary:
Provides a basic start for access policies. Objects expose various capabilities, like CAN_VIEW, CAN_EDIT, etc., and set a policy for each capability. We currently implement three policies, PUBLIC (anyone, including logged-out), USERS (any logged-in) and NOONE (nobody). There's also a way to provide automatic capability grants (e.g., the owner of an object can always see it, even if some capability is set to "NOONE"), but I'm not sure how great the implementation feels and it might change.
Most of the code here is providing a primitive for efficient policy-aware list queries. The problem with doing queries naively is that you have to do crazy amounts of filtering, e.g. to show the user page 6, you need to filter at least 600 objects (and likely more) before you can figure out which ones are 500-600 for them. You can't just do "LIMIT 500, 100" because that might have only 50 results, or no results. Instead, the query looks like "WHERE id > last_visible_id", and then we fetch additional pages as necessary to satisfy the request.
The general idea is that we move all data access to Query classes and have them do object filtering. The ID paging primitive allows efficient paging in most cases, and the executeOne() method provides a concise way to do policy checks for edit/view screens.
We'll probably end up with mostly broader policy UIs or configuration-based policies, but there are at least a few cases for per-object privacy (e.g., marking tasks as "Security", and restricting things to the members of projects) so I figured we'd start with a flexible primitive and the simplify it in the UI where we can.
Test Plan: Unit tests, played around in the UI with various policy settings.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2210
Summary:
'cuz we need to be phamous!
V1 feature set
- posts
-- standard thing you'd expect - a title and a remarkup-powered body and...
-- "phame" title - a short string that can be used to reference the story. this gets auto-updated when you mess with the title.
-- configuration - for now, do you want Facebook, Disqus or no comments? this is a per-post thing but feeds from an instance-wide configuration
Please do toss out any must have features or changes.
Test Plan: played around with this bad boy like whoa
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T1111
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2202
Summary:
There have been a couple of requests for this since bookmarks are "out this year like woah" and "totally uncool dude".
Allow users to save named custom queries and make them the /maniphest/ default if they so desire.
A little messy. :/
Test Plan: Saved, edited, deleted custom queries. Made custom query default; made 'no default' default. Verified default behavior. Issued a modified search from a custom query.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, 20after4
Maniphest Tasks: T923, T1034
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1964
Summary:
We don't use versioned URIs for images, so when they change users may get old versions.
This was a particular issue with the recent logo change, which several users reported cache-related issues from.
Instead, use Celerity to manage image URI versions in addition to CSS/JS.
This is complicated, because we need to rewrite image URIs inside of CSS, which means the hash of a CSS file has to be derived from the current image data. Otherwise, when we updated an image the CSS wouldn't update, so we wouldn't be any better off.
So basically we:
- Find all the "raw" files, and put them into the map.
- Find all the CSS/JS, perform content-altering transformations on it (i.e., not minification) based on the partial map, and then put it into the map based on transformed hashes.
(If we wanted, we could now do CSS variables or whatever for "free", more or less.)
Test Plan:
- Regenerated celerity map, browsed site, verified images generated with versioned URIs.
- Moved "blue" flag image over "green" flag image, regenerated map, verified "green" flag image and the associated CSS changed hashes.
- Added transformation unit tests; ran unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1073
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2146
Summary:
I've considered that user may have set editor but not checked out Phabricator repositories.
But stack trace is useful mainly for developers.
Test Plan:
Click on path in Unhandled Exception.
Repeat with disabled editor.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2107
Summary:
various stripe stuff, including
- external stripe library
- payment form
- test controller to play with payment form, sample business logic
My main questions / discussion topics are...
- is the stripe PHP library too big? (ie should I write something more simple just for phabricator?)
-- if its cool, what is the best way to include the client? (ie should I make it a submodule rather than the flat copy here?)
- is the JS I wrote (too) ridiculous?
-- particularly unhappy with the error message stuff being in JS *but* it seemed the best choice given the most juicy error messages come from the stripe JS such that the overall code complexity is lowest this way.
- how should the stripe JS be included?
-- flat copy like I did here?
-- some sort of external?
-- can we just load it off stripe servers at request time? (I like that from the "if stripe is down, stripe is down" perspective)
- wasn't sure if the date control was too silly and should just be baked into the form?
-- for some reason I feel like its good to be prepared to walk away from Stripe / switch providers here, though I think this is on the wrong side of pragmatic
Test Plan: - played around with sample client form
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2096
Summary:
Like the title says, similar to Facebook Tasks.
Not sure how I really feel about this, but I guess it's kind of OK? I never used
this feature in Facebook Tasks but I think some people like it.
The drag-and-drop to repri across priorities feels okayish.
Because subpriority is a double and we just split the difference when
reprioritizing, you lose ~a bit of precision every time you repri two tasks
against each other and so you can break it by swapping the priorities of two
tasks ~50 times. This case is pretty silly and pathological. We can add some
code to deal with this at some point if necessary.
I think this also fixes the whacky task layout widths once and for all.
(There are a couple of minor UI glitches like headers not vanishing and header
counts not updating that I'm not fixing because I am lazy.)
Test Plan: Dragged and dropped tasks around.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, mgummelt
Maniphest Tasks: T859
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1731
Summary:
**Who can delete global rules?**: I discussed this with @jungejason. The current behavior is that the rule author or any administrator can delete a global rule, but this
isn't consistent with who can edit a rule (anyone) and doesn't really make much sense (it's an artifact of the global/personal split). I proposed that anyone can delete a
rule but we don't actually delete them, and log the deletion. However, when it came time to actually write the code for this I backed off a bit and continued actually
deleting the rules -- I think this does a reasonable job of balancing accountability with complexity. So the new impelmentation is:
- Personal rules can be deleted only by their owners.
- Global rules can be deleted by any user.
- All deletes are logged.
- Logs are more detailed.
- All logged actions can be viewed in aggregate.
**Minor Cleanup**
- Merged `HomeController` and `AllController`.
- Moved most queries to Query classes.
- Use AphrontFormSelectControl::renderSelectTag() where appropriate (this is a fairly recent addition).
- Use an AphrontErrorView to render the dry run notice (this didn't exist when I ported).
- Reenable some transaction code (this works again now).
- Removed the ability for admins to change rule authors (this was a little buggy, messy, and doesn't make tons of sense after the personal/global rule split).
- Rules which depend on other rules now display the right options (all global rules, all your personal rules for personal rules).
- Fix a bug in AphrontTableView where the "no data" cell would be rendered too wide if some columns are not visible.
- Allow selectFilter() in AphrontNavFilterView to be called without a 'default' argument.
Test Plan:
- Browsed, created, edited, deleted personal and gules.
- Verified generated logs.
- Did some dry runs.
- Verified transcript list and transcript details.
- Created/edited all/any rules; created/edited once/every time rules.
- Filtered admin views by users.
Reviewers: jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2040
Summary:
Flags are a personal collection of things you want to take a look at later. You can use several different colors and add notes.
Not really sure if this is actually a good idea or not but it was easy to build.
Planned features:
- Allow Herald rules to add flags.
- In the "edit flag" dialog, have a "[x] Subscribe Me" checkbox that CCs you.
- Support Diffusion.
- Support Phriction.
- Always show flags on an object if you have them (in every view)?
- Edit dialog feels a little heavy?
- More filtering in /flag/ tool.
- Add a top-level links somewhere?
Test Plan: Added, edited and removed flags from things. Viewed flags in flag view.
Reviewers: aran, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, Koolvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1041
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2024
Summary:
- Still really really rough.
- Adds a full synchronous mode for debugging.
- Adds some logging.
- It can now allocate EC2 machines and put webroots on them in a hacky, terrible way.
- Adds a base query class.
Test Plan: oh hey look a test page? http://ec2-50-18-65-151.us-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com:2011/
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2026
Summary:
- Feature request from Airtime that I missed in the feedback notes, came up yesterday.
- Identify git submodules as "FILE_SUBMODULE", not "FILE_NORMAL".
- Link git submodules to an external resolver endpoint, which tries to find commits in tracked repositories.
- Identify git symlinks as "FILE_SYMLINK", not "FILE_NORMAL".
- Add folder, file, symlink and externals icons.
Test Plan:
- externals/javelin is now identified as a submoudule and links to Javelin, not identified as a file and links to error.
- bin/phd is now identified as a symlink.
- Interfaces have pretty icons.
Reviewers: btrahan, cpiro, ddfisher, keebuhm, allenjohnashton
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1975
Test Plan:
Search for some symbol. Click on the result. Verify that there is not // in URL.
Click on the link from generated exception.
View history in Diffusion, click on Browse.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1979
Summary:
Diffusion request/uri handling is currently a big, hastily ported mess. In particular, it has:
- Tons and tons of duplicated code.
- Bugs with handling unusual branch and file names.
- An excessively large (and yet insufficiently expressive) API on DiffusionRequest, including a nonsensical concrete base class.
- Other tools were doing hacky things like passing ":" branch names.
This diff attempts to fix these issues.
- Make the base class abstract (it was concrete ONLY for "/diffusion/").
- Move all URI generation to DiffusionRequest. Make the core static. Add unit tests.
- Delete the 300 copies of URI generation code throughout Diffusion.
- Move all URI parsing to DiffusionRequest. Make the core static. Add unit tests.
- Add an appropriate static initializer for other callers.
- Convert all code calling `newFromAphrontRequestDictionary` outside of Diffusion to the new `newFromDictionary` API.
- Refactor static initializers to be sensibly-sized.
- Refactor derived DiffusionRequest classes to remove duplicated code.
- Properly encode branch names (fixes branches with "/", see <https://github.com/facebook/phabricator/issues/100>).
- Properly encode path names (fixes issues in D1742).
- Properly escape delimiter characters ";" and "$" in path names so files like "$100" are not interpreted as "line 100".
- Fix a couple warnings.
- Fix a couple lint issues.
- Fix a bug where we would not parse filenames with spaces in them correctly in the Git browse query.
- Fix a bug where Git change queries would fail unnecessarily.
- Provide or improve some documentation.
This thing is pretty gigantic but also kind of hard to split up. If it's unreasonably difficult to review, let me know and I can take a stab at it though.
This supplants D1742.
Test Plan:
- Used home, repository, branch, browse, change, history, diff (ajax), lastmodified (ajax) views of Diffusion.
- Used Owners typeaheads and search.
- Used diffusion.getrecentcommitsbypath method.
- Pushed a change to an absurdly-named file on an absurdly-named branch, everything worked properly.
{F9185}
Reviewers: nh, vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1921
Summary:
- Add inline comments to Audits, like Differential.
- Creates new storage for the comments in the Audits database.
- Creates a new PhabricatorAuditInlineComment class, similar to DifferentialInlineComment.
- Defines an Interface which Differential and Audit comments conform to.
- Makes consumers of DifferentialInlineComments consume objects which implement that interface instead.
- Adds save
NOTE: Some features are still missing! Wanted to cut this off before it got crazy:
- Inline comments aren't shown in the main comment list.
- Inline comments aren't shown in the emails.
- Inline comments aren't previewed.
I'll followup with those but this was getting pretty big.
@vrana, does the SQL change look correct?
Test Plan:
- Created, edited, deleted, replied to, reloaded and saved inline comments in Diffusion, on the left and right side of diffs.
- Created, edited, deleted, replied to, reloaded and saved inline comments in Differentila, on the left and right side of primary and diff-versus-diff diffs.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1898
Summary:
These are all unambiguously unextensible. Issues I hit:
- Maniphest Change/Diff controllers, just consolidated them.
- Some search controllers incorrectly extend from "Search" but should extend from "SearchBase". This has no runtime effects.
- D1836 introduced a closure, which we don't handle correctly (somewhat on purpose; we target PHP 5.2). See T962.
Test Plan: Ran "testEverythingImplemented" unit test to identify classes extending from `final` classes. Resolved issues.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T795
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1843
Summary: Provide a reasonable JS API for the Aphlict client. Provide an example behavior to invoke it.
Test Plan:
Ran "aphlict_server.js" with:
$ sudo node aphlict_server.js
Loaded /aphlict/. Opened console. Got "hello" from the server every second.
Got reasonable errors with the server not present ("Security exception", but this is because it can't connect to port 843 to access the policy server).
Reviewers: ddfisher, keebuhm, allenjohnashton, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T944
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1800
Summary:
- Owners has "by user" commit views, but these are supplanted by the Audit views. Just nuke them.
- Owners has "by package" commit views; consolidate these onto the package detail pages and link into Audit for full details.
Test Plan: Browsed all the Owners interfaces, clicked "View All ... Commits" buttons.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1764
Summary:
I am not sure if it is by purpose but Phabricator now process paths like
https://secure.phabricator.com/D1681-so-freaking-cool.
The reason is that there are bunch of rules with missing '$' at the end.
This mistake is so common and easy to create that I've rather removed all '$'
and changed the way how the key is processed.
I am not absolutelly sure if the '$' was missing in some rules by purpose but if
it is the case then we should rather add explicit '.*'.
This change is backwards compatible with custom maps ending with '$'. It is not
compatible with paths not ending with '$' by purpose.
Test Plan:
Visit /, /differential/, /differential/stats/revisions/, /D1681.
Run before and after:
./aphrontpath.php D123
./aphrontpath.php D123-cool
./aphrontpath.php /
./aphrontpath.php differential
./aphrontpath.php differential/
./aphrontpath.php differential/stats/revisions/
./aphrontpath.php /file/data/x/PHID-FILE-y/z
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1745
Summary: Since we embed comments/audits into Diffusion now, we don't need the
old edit interface.
Test Plan: Grepped for links to old interface.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1714
Summary:
We can drive this query better from the Audit tool now; get rid of the Diffusion
version.
Preserve usernames in URIs as per T900.
Test Plan: Clicked "Commits" from profile. Browsed audit commit filters.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1713
Summary:
Allow Maniphest result sets to be exported to Excel.
Spreadsheet_Excel_Writer is awful but comparatively easy to get working. There's
also a "PHPExcel" package but it has some autoload conflicts right now and this
seems good-enough.
Test Plan: Exported a bunch of tasks to Excel.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T923
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1721
Summary: Add comment previews and saved drafts to audits, like Maniphest /
Differential.
Test Plan: Typed stuff into the box. Got a preview. Reloaded page. Stuff was
still there. Submitted comment. Stuff is gone.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1699
Summary:
Allows you to write a commit rule that triggers an audit by a user (personal
rules) or a project (global rules).
Mostly this is trying to make auditing more lightweight and accessible in
environments where setting up Owners packages doesn't make sense.
For instance, Disqus wants a rule like "trigger an audit for everything that
didn't have a Differential revision". While not necessarily scalable, this is a
perfectly reasonable rule for a small company, but a lot of work to implement
with Owners (and you'll get a lot of collateral damage if you don't make every
committer a project owner).
Instead, they can create a project called 'Unreviewed Commits' and write a rule
like:
- When: Differential revision does not exist
- Action: Trigger an Audit for project: "Unreviewed Commits"
Then whoever cares can join that project and they'll see those audits in their
queue, and when they approve/raise on commits their actions will affect the
project audit.
Similarly, if I want to look at all commits that match some other rule (say,
XSS) but only want to do it like once a month, I can just set up an audit rule
and go through the queue when I feel like it.
NOTE: This abuses the 'packagePHID' field to also store user and project PHIDs.
Through the magic of handles, this (apparently) works fine for now; I'll do a
big schema patch soon but have several other edits I want to make at the same
time.
Also:
- Adds an "active" fiew for /audit/, eventually this will be like the
Differential "active" view (stuff that is relevant to you right now).
- On commits, highlight triggered audits you are responsible for.
Test Plan: Added personal and global audit triggers to Herald, reparsed some
commits with --herald, got audits. Browsed all audit interfaces to make sure
nothing exploded. Viewed a commit where I was responsible for only some audits.
Performed audits and made sure the triggers I am supposed to be responsible for
updated properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1690
Summary:
I added multiline highlighting with the syntax:
http://site/path/to/file$from-to
NOTE: you can reverse the from and to
Test Plan: Open a file in diffusion and attempt to highlight multiple lines
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1693
Summary:
This is intended to supplant the existing "audit edit" interface. I've changed
them to both drive down the same write pathway, but the UIs are still different.
I'll fully merge them in a future diff.
Add a comment box (like Maniphest and Differential) to Diffusion. When users
make comments, their comments appear on the commit. Any audits triggers they are
responsible for are updated to reflect actions they take, as well.
Currently, audits can only be triggered by packages, but I intend to allow them
to be triggered by users and projects (via herald rules) in an upcoming diff.
Thus some of the language like "projects, users or packages" when the code is
clearly dealing only with "packagePHID".
Test Plan: Made audit updates via commit interface and via existing edit
interface. Verified both interfaces updated correctly, and that audit
responsibility rules were applied properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1688
Summary:
beyond the title, this diff tweaks the test console to have a bit more
functionality. also makes a small change to CSS for AphrontFormControlMarkup,
which IMO fixes a display issue on
https://secure.phabricator.com/settings/page/profile/ where the Profile URI is
all up in the air and whatnot
I think this is missing pagination. I am getting tired of the size though and
will add later. See T905.
Test Plan:
viewed, updated and deleted client authorizations. viewed, created,
updated and deleted clients
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T849, T850, T848
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1683
Summary:
Currently, audits are only accessible through the Owners tool. Start moving them
to their own first-class tool in preparation for broader audit integration.
- Lay some infrastructure groundwork (e.g. AuditQuery).
- Build a basic /audit/ view.
- Show audits on the commit page in Diffusion.
This has some code duplication with stuff we've already got, but I'll merge
everything together as we move forward on this.
Test Plan: Looked at /audit/ and a commit.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1685
Summary:
First stab at a batch editor for Maniphest. Basically, you can select a group of
tasks and then import them into the "batch" interface, where you can edit all of
them at once.
High level goal is to make it easier for users in PM/filer/support/QA roles to
deal with large numbers of tasks quickly.
This implementation has a few major limitations:
- The only available actions are "add projects" and "remove projects".
- There is no review / undo / log stuff.
- All the changes are applied in-process, which may not scale terribly well.
However, the immediate need is just around projects and this seemed like a
reasonable place to draw the line for a minimal useful version of the tool.
Test Plan: Used batch editor to add and remove projects from groups of tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan, yairlivne
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, sandra
Maniphest Tasks: T441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1680
Summary: The /public/ rule needs to come before the more general subfilter rule.
Test Plan: Hit "all", "my projects" and "public" feeds, they all work.
Reviewers: davidreuss
Reviewed By: davidreuss
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1667
Summary:
I haven't actually been using this as much as I thought, and am more interested
in the full view than the per-project view.
Let's try moving it off /home/ and then maybe adding some filtering options at
some point.
Test Plan: Looked at "all" and "my projects" in feed. Looked at home page.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1658
Summary:
Show some statistics, like number of revisions, number of
revisions per week, lines per revision, etc. for phrivolous amusement.
Test Plan:
- Went to /differential/stats/revisions/
Numbers seem right
- Clicked 'Accepted'
Again
- Changed to another user with long history
Load time was not too long though delay noticeable
- Clicked 'Requested changes to'
User was preserved, looks good
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1643
Summary:
adds a Phabricator OAuth server, which has three big commands:
- auth - allows $user to authorize a given client or application. if $user has already authorized, it hands an authoization code back to $redirect_uri
- token - given a valid authorization code, this command returns an authorization token
- whoami - Conduit.whoami, all nice and purdy relative to the oauth server.
Also has a "test" handler, which I used to create some test data. T850 will
delete this as it adds the ability to create this data in the Phabricator
product.
This diff also adds the corresponding client in Phabricator for the Phabricator
OAuth Server. (Note that clients are known as "providers" in the Phabricator
codebase but client makes more sense relative to the server nomenclature)
Also, related to make this work well
- clean up the diagnostics page by variabilizing the provider-specific
information and extending the provider classes as appropriate.
- augment Conduit.whoami for more full-featured OAuth support, at least where
the Phabricator client is concerned
What's missing here... See T844, T848, T849, T850, and T852.
Test Plan:
- created a dummy client via the test handler. setup development.conf to have
have proper variables for this dummy client. went through authorization and
de-authorization flows
- viewed the diagnostics page for all known oauth providers and saw
provider-specific debugging information
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T44, T797
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1595
Summary:
This is pretty simple and unpolished, but it's getting pretty big and it seems
like a reasonable starting point.
- Log chat in various "channels".
- Conduit record and query methods.
- IRCBot integration for IRC logging
Major TODO:
- Web UI is really unpolished and has no search, paging, anchor-linking, etc.
Basically all presentation stuff, though.
- I think the bot should have a map of channels to log with channel aliases?
- The "channels" should probably be in a separate table.
- The "authors" should probably be correlated to Phabricator accounts somehow,
where possible.
Test Plan: Used phabotlocal to log #phabricator.
Reviewers: kdeggelman, btrahan, Koolvin
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T837
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1625
Summary:
add support for searching by package owner for Related Commits
and commits that Need Attention.
Test Plan:
verified that
- searching by package still works when there is or there is no commits
found
- searching by package owner works when there is or there is no commits
found
Reviewers: epriestley, nh
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, prithvi, dihde14, Girish
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1631
Summary:
- Restore quick methods for getting to common features (upload file, create
task, etc.)
- Provide a flexible cli-like navigation element similar to stuff used at
Facebook (bunny1 / lolbunny).
Test Plan: Used jump nav and nav buttons.
Reviewers: btrahan, fratrik
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1619
Summary:
Pretty straightforward; see title. Kind of gross but I have a bunch
more iterations in mind here (like filtering). Paging this is a little tricky
since we can't easily use AphrontPagerView, as it relies on OFFSET, and I think
that's sort of sketchy to use here for UX reasons (query performance and view
consistency as feed updates).
Test Plan: Looked at feed, paged through feed.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1616
"Content-Disposition: attachment"
Summary:
We currently serve some files off the primary domain (with "Content-Disposition:
attachment" + a CSRF check) and some files off the alternate domain (without
either).
This is not sufficient, because some UAs (like the iPad) ignore
"Content-Disposition: attachment". So there's an attack that goes like this:
- Alice uploads xss.html
- Alice says to Bob "hey download this file on your iPad"
- Bob clicks "Download" on Phabricator on his iPad, gets XSS'd.
NOTE: This removes the CSRF check for downloading files. The check is nice to
have but only raises the barrier to entry slightly. Between iPad / sniffing /
flash bytecode attacks, single-domain installs are simply insecure. We could
restore the check at some point in conjunction with a derived authentication
cookie (i.e., a mini-session-token which is only useful for downloading files),
but that's a lot of complexity to drop all at once.
(Because files are now authenticated only by knowing the PHID and secret key,
this also fixes the "no profile pictures in public feed while logged out"
issue.)
Test Plan: Viewed, info'd, and downloaded files
Reviewers: btrahan, arice, alok
Reviewed By: arice
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T843
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1608
