Summary:
See discussion in T2715. Currently, PHIDs are all hard coded in the PHID application. In the long run, we need to move them out into actual applications.
A specific immediate issue is Releeph, which uses a very very old and very broken mechanism to inject PHIDs in a way that only sort of works.
Moving forward, every PHID type will be provided by a `PhabricatorPHIDType` subclass, which will manage loading it, etc.
This also moves toward cleaning up the "load objects by name" (where "name" means something like `D12`) code, which is an //enormous// mess and spread across at least 4-5 callsites.
Test Plan: Used `phid.lookup` and `phid.query` to load Slowvotes.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6502
Summary:
Nice title. We add three new transactions - IMAGE_FILE, IMAGE_NAME, and IMAGE_DESCRIPTION. The first is a bit like subscribers as it is a list of file phids. The latter have values of the form ($file_phid => $data), where $data is $name or $description respectively. This is because we need to collate transactions based on $file_phid...
Overall, this uses the _underyling files_ and not the "PholioImage" to determine if things are unique or not. That said, simply mark PholioImages as obsolete so inline comments about no-longer applicable PholioImages don't break.
Does a reasonable job implementing the mock. Note you can't "update" an image at this time, though you can delete and add at will.
Test Plan: played with pholio a ton.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3489
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6441
Summary:
got some basics here --
- can create document
- creates document object and document body object and cross-reference
- can update document
- creates document body object and updates reference from document object
- contributors stored correctly
- a contributor is anyone who has created or updated a legal document
- can subscribe to documents
- can flag documents
- can comment on documents
- can query for documents based on creator and create range
- uses basically modern stuff
Missing stuff --
- T3488
- T3483
- T3482
- T3481
- T3480
- T3479
Test Plan: TRUNCATED the database. From scratch made 3 legal docs. Verified versions and version were correct in document and document body database entries respectively. Left comments and verified versions and version did not update. Left updates and verified those updated versions and version. Flagged document and verified it showed up on homepage. Subscribed and verified transaction showed up.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6351
Summary:
Ref T2852. This table holds data about external objects and allows us to write edges to them.
Objects are identified with an `<applicationType, applicationDomain, objectType, objectID>` tuple. For example, Asana tasks will be, e.g., `<asana, asana.com, asana:task, 93829279873>` or similar.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6271
Summary:
Ref T1536. Currently, we have about 40 auth-related configuration options. This is already roughly 20% of our config, and we want to add more providers. Additionally, we want to turn some of these auth options into multi-auth options (e.g., allow multiple Phabricator OAuth installs, or, theoretically multiple LDAP servers).
I'm going to move this into a separate "Auth" tool with a minimal CLI (`bin/auth`) interface and a more full web interface. Roughly:
- Administrators will use the app to manage authentication providers.
- The `bin/auth` CLI will provide a safety hatch if you lock yourself out by disabling all usable providers somehow.
- We'll migrate existing configuration into the app and remove it.
General goals:
- Make it much easier to configure authentication by providing an interface for it.
- Make it easier to configure everything else by reducing the total number of available options.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6196
Summary:
Now has policy support (not really)
Now uses CountdownQuery
Now has handles
Now uses common way for remarkup
Remarkup still looks terrible
Test Plan: Added countdowns, edited countdowns. Did even embed some. Couldn't break it
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T2624
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6012
Summary:
Ref T988. This adds basics for the non-static publishing target:
- Storage (called "Live", e.g. `DivinerLiveAtom` to distinguish it from shared classes like `DivinerAtom`).
- Mostly populate the storage.
- Some minor fixes and improvements.
Test Plan: Generated docs, looked at DB, saw mostly-sensible output.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T988
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5973
Summary:
Fixes T3132. Currently, if a user deletes a file which is present in a mock, that mock throws an exception when loading. If the file is also the cover photo, the mock list throws an exception as well.
In other applications, we can sometimes deal with this (a sub-object vanishing) by implicitly hiding the parent object (for example, we can just vanish feed stories about objects which no longer exist). We can also sometimes deal with it by preventing sub-objects from being directly deleted.
However, neither approach is reasonable in this case.
If we vanish the whole mock, we'll lose all the comments and it will generally be weird. Vanishing a mock is a big deal compared to vanishing a feed story. We'll also need to load more data on the list view to prevent showing a mock on the list view and then realizing we need to vanish it on the detail view (because all of its images have been deleted).
We permit total deletion of files to allow users to recover from accidentally uploading sensitive files (which has happened a few times), and I'm hesitant to remove this capability because I think it serves a real need, so we can't prevent sub-objects from being deleted.
So we're left in a relatively unique situation. To solve this, I've added a "builtin" mechanism, which allows us to expose some resource we ship with as a PhabricatorFile. Then we just swap it out in place of the original file and proceed forward normally, as though nothing happened. The user sees a placeholder image instead of the original, but everything else works reasonably and this seems like a fairly acceptable outcome.
I believe we can use this mechanism to simplify some other code too, like default profile pictures.
Test Plan: Deleted a Pholio mock cover image's file. Implemented change, saw functional Pholio again with beautiful life-affirming "?" art replacing soul-shattering exception.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5870
Summary: Although I imagine we aren't really going to have an "add to cart" type storefront, putting this in place makes a lot of other workflows simpler. No storage yet, just allows reasonable construction of a "buy stuff" page.
Test Plan: {F41342}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5745
Summary: Created PhabricatorExternalAccount class with only data members. Will discuss with you regarding the necessary functions to be implemented in this class. Sql Patch to create a new table for external_accounts. Will I have to write unit tests the new storage object? Sending you this diff so that you can comment on this to further improve :).
Test Plan: {F40977}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T1536, T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5724
Summary:
Ref T2787. This does very little so far, but makes inroads on accounts and billing. This is mostly just modeled on what Stripe looks like. The objects are:
- **Account**: Has one or more authorized users, who can make manage the account. An example might be "Phacility", and the three of us would be able to manage it. A user may be associated with more than one account (e.g., a corporate account and a personal account) but the UI tries to simplify the common case of a single account.
- **Payment Method**: Something we can get sweet sweet money from; for now, a credit card registered with Stripe. Payment methods are associated with an account.
- **Product**: A good (one time charge) or service (recurring charge). This might be "t-shirt" or "enterprise plan" or "hourly support" or whatever else.
- **Purchase**: Represents a user purchasing a Product for an Account, using a Payment Method. e.g., you bought a shirt, or started a plan, or purchased support.
- **Charge**: Actual charges against payment methods. A Purchase can create more than one charge if it's a plan, or if the first charge fails and we re-bill.
This doesn't fully account for stuff like coupons/discounts yet but they should fit into the model without any issues.
This only implements `Account`, and that only partially.
Test Plan: {F37531}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5435
Summary: it's ugly. but it works. basically. See T2399 for a roughly prioritized list of what still needs to happen.
Test Plan:
- created a conpherence with myself from my profile
- created a conpherence with myself from "new conpherence"
- created a conphernece with another from "new conpherence"
- created a conpherence with several others
- created a conpherence with files in the initial post
- verified files via comment text ("{F232} is awesome!") and via traditional attach
- edited a conpherence image
- verified it showed up in the header and in the conpherence menu on the left
- edited a conpherence title
- verified it showed up in the header and in the conpherence menu on the right
- verified each widget showed up when clicked and displayed the proper data
- calendar being an exception since it sucks so hard right now.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, chad, codeblock, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2301
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4620
Summary:
This is somewhat clowny, particularly in how it handles JSON encode/decode, but
I've commented why I did things the way I did. The goal is to store minified JSON
but show pretty-printed JSON where possible, to the user editing it.
Test Plan:
* Went to /config/ and saw a list of keys from the `default` config.
* Clicked on one of them, submitted the default value successfully.
* Changed the value to invalid JSON and got a decent error.
* Changed the value to valid JSON and checked the DB to confirm it saved.
* Confirmed the DB values were minified.
* Confirmed the user-facing values were pretty-printed where they could be.
* Confirmed that PHIDs were getting assigned properly and that isDeleted
properly defaulted to false/0.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2246
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4290
Summary:
Split Pholio's transaction implementation into generic and application-specific parts. Moves us toward generic transactions, with support for:
- Editing and deleting comments.
- Setting visibility of individual comments (I'm not a fan of this feature but we'll see).
I want to move everything to a more generic piece of infrastructure but there's very little they can share right now so adding transactions to, e.g., Paste or Macros (T2157) means massive amounts of similar code.
Tons of work left to do here, but I think it basically works. Here's a screenshot:
{F26820}
Test Plan: Made transactions in Pholio.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2104
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4136
Summary:
I'm not going to land this until it's a bit more fleshed out since it would just confuse users, but this is probably more reviewable as a few diffs adding a couple features than one ULTRA-diff adding everything. Implement application basics for Pholio. This does more or less nothing, but adds storage, subscribe, flag, markup, indexing, query basics, PHIDs, handle loads, a couple of realy really basic controllers, etc.
Basic hierarchy is:
- **Moleskine**: Top-level object like a Differential Revision, like "Ponder Feed Ideas".
- **Image**: Each Moleskine has one or more images, like the unexpanded / expanded / mobile / empty states of feed.
- **Transaction**: Comment or edit, like Maniphest. I generally want to move most apps to a transaction model so we can log edits.
- **PixelComment**: Equivalent of an inline comment.
Test Plan: Created a fake object and viewed it.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, davidreuss
Maniphest Tasks: T2097
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3817
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.
Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
Summary:
Ponder is similar in spirit to the Wiki tool, but uses a Q&A
format and up/downvotes to signal user sentiment. Popular
questions are moved to the top of the feed on a 5-minute
cycle based on age (younger is better) and vote count (higher
is better).
Pre-apologies for noob diff.
Test Plan:
- `./bin/phd list` Should include `PonderHeatDaemon`; phd launch it
if necessary.
- Navigate to /ponder/ ; observe sanity when adding questions,
voting on them, and adding answers.
- Confirm that questions and answers are linkable using Q5 / Q5#A5 formatted object links.
- Confirm that searching for Ponder Questions works using built-in
search.
Feedback on code / schema / whatever organization very welcome.
Reviewers: nh, vrana, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: gmarcotte, aran, Korvin, starruler
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3136
Summary:
blogs are collections of posts. a blog also has metadata like a name, description and "bloggers" that can edit the metadata of the blog and contribute posts.
changes include the post edit flow where bloggers can now select which blogs to publish to. also made various small tweaks throughout the UI to make things sensical and clean as the concept of blogs is introduced.
there's edges powering this stuff. bloggers <=> blogs and posts <=> blogs in particular.
Test Plan:
made blogs, deleted blogs, tried to make blogs with no bloggers. all went well.
verified ui to publish only showed up for public posts, published posts to blogs, un-published posts to blogs, re-published posts to blogs, deleted posts and verified they disappeared from blogs.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3003
Summary:
A later diff adds unit tests against edges, but we need real objects to connect with edges. Add some trivial objects to the Harbormaster database to compliment the similar HarbormasterScratchTable.
On its own, this does nothing interesting.
Test Plan: Built unit tests on this in a followup.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1162
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2937
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.
NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.
Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.
Auditors: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1103
2012-06-01 12:32:44 -07:00
Renamed from src/applications/phid/constants/PhabricatorPHIDConstants.php (Browse further)
