Summary:
Ref T1191.
- Adds definitions for missing keys and keys with wrong uniqueness. Generally, I defined these before fixing the key query to actually pull all keys and support uniqueness.
- Moves "key uniqueness" to note severity; this is fixable (probably?) and there are no remaining issues.
- Moves "Missing Key" to note severity; missing keys are fixable and all remaining missing keys are really missing (either missing edge keys, or missing PHID keys):
{F210089}
- Moves "Surplus Key" to note seveirty; surplus keys are fixable all remaining surplus keys are really surplus (duplicate key in Harbormaster, key on unused column in Worker):
{F210090}
Test Plan:
- Vetted missing/surplus/unique messages.
- 146 issues remaining.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10590
Summary: I'm pretty sure that `@group` annotations are useless now... see D9855. Also fixed various other minor issues.
Test Plan: Eye-ball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9859
Summary:
the JS is fragile with respect to the tokenizer coming in from the people widget. make sure to always try to load this up. Note this generally needs to get cleaned up where the server should only send down the *exact* bits the client needs. This is all TODO as part of getting this on mobile perfectly. Also note this fragility exists still in that you can break conpherence by clicking quickly before the initial tokenizer load loads.
For old bad data, at some point we weren't updating participation as well as we do today in the editor class. the result is with the migration and code change some conversation participants have bad "last seen message" counts. the simplest case is the test user talking to themselves -- threads before the editor code fixes / changes will have the entire thread as unread for these folks. The other buggy case I saw was where the "last reply" to a thread wasn't being count. These issues showed up for threads February and older which is old.
Test Plan: edited conpherence meta data and no JS bugs. pontificated and no JS bugs. added a person and no JS bugs.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5622
Summary: this just does the back-end migration. I realized that we don't need to keep track of cacheTitle and cachePhoto since those are based off recent participation handles and dynamic relative to who is viewing it. Also kept the "last seen phid" as I think that will be useful to have auto-scroll to where you last read. Ref T2867.
Test Plan: did the migration. observed sensical values in the database. created a new conpherence - again sensical values. updated a conpherence - more sensical values.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Maniphest Tasks: T2867
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5567
Summary: Introduces a new settings panel for Conpherence specific settings.
Test Plan:
started a thread with a test user, thus two participants total. Replied to conpherence, toggling notification settings in between. Verified 1 or 2 emails were sent as appropos to the current toggle.
Toggled global setting and verified setting was updated in conpherences where nothing was specified. Verified setting conpherence setting overrides global setting.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2521
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5391
Summary: we weren't updating the "latest seen transaction PHID" properly. do that and ONLY do it from the view handler so we know the user got a real good chance of actually seeing the message. also we weren't searching through the transactions correctly; fix that.
Test Plan: sent a test user some messages. noted the proper count of unread messages.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2399
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4677
Summary: it's ugly. but it works. basically. See T2399 for a roughly prioritized list of what still needs to happen.
Test Plan:
- created a conpherence with myself from my profile
- created a conpherence with myself from "new conpherence"
- created a conphernece with another from "new conpherence"
- created a conpherence with several others
- created a conpherence with files in the initial post
- verified files via comment text ("{F232} is awesome!") and via traditional attach
- edited a conpherence image
- verified it showed up in the header and in the conpherence menu on the left
- edited a conpherence title
- verified it showed up in the header and in the conpherence menu on the right
- verified each widget showed up when clicked and displayed the proper data
- calendar being an exception since it sucks so hard right now.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, chad, codeblock, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2301
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4620
