Summary:
The conduit access to Differential kind of sucks and we want to break
back-compat in order to fix it (see D1114).
To make it easier to pull this off, I want to build out the Conduit logging a
bit so administrators can identify which users are making deprecated calls.
We should probably build a little more infrastructure around this too (API
versions?), but this is at least a reasonable step forward which gives us more
insight into the use of Conduit and more tools to smooth the deprecation
process.
This initial commit is super basic but the interface currently says "stuff",
I'll build this out a little more in a bit.
Test Plan: Looked at call logs.
Reviewers: btrahan, nh, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan
Differential Revision: 1144
Summary: createrevision creates the revision as the user which certificate is
used. Add a meta parameter to API calls named actAsUser so one user can create
revisions for someone else. Right now there is no authentication.
Test Plan: Called createrevision with one users cert and set actAsUser to
someone else. The revision was created as the actAsUser user.
Reviewers: epriestley, nh, jungejason
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 1087
Filesystem::readRandomCharacters()
Summary: See T547. To improve auditability of use of crypto-sensitive hash
functions, use Filesystem::readRandomCharacters() in place of
sha1(Filesystem::readRandomBytes()) when we're just generating random ASCII
strings.
Test Plan:
- Generated a new PHID.
- Logged out and logged back in (to test sessions).
- Regenerated Conduit certificate.
- Created a new task, verified mail key generated sensibly.
- Created a new revision, verified mail key generated sensibly.
- Ran "arc list", got blocked, installed new certificate, ran "arc list"
again.
Reviewers: jungejason, nh, tuomaspelkonen, aran, benmathews
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason
Differential Revision: 1000
without quotes around it (and similar)
Summary: See D1010. The API uniformly requires JSON, which is good for
strictness and predictablity but can be bad for UEX, especially considering that
we silently continue after failing to decode things. Toss the user a lifeline
when they make this common mistake.
Test Plan: Ran API calls with invalid and valid inputs. Invalid inputs gave me a
reasonable error message.
Reviewers: davidreuss, jungejason, nh, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: nh
CC: aran, nh
Differential Revision: 1012
Summary:
See T354. List every rule which has ever been applied in X-Herald-Rules, not
just the ones which most recently triggered.
Also some random fixes while I was debugging this:
- When conduit methods throw non-conduit exceptions, make sure they get
logged.
- Trigger the Facebook "tasks" backcompat block only if we were going to fail
(this should reduce the shakniess of the transition).
- Fix some log spew from the new field stuff.
Test Plan:
- Created a rule (ID #3) "No Zebras" which triggers for revisions without
"zebra" in the title.
- Created a revision without "zebra" in the title, got X-Herald-Rules: <2>,
<3>
- Updated revision to have "zebra" in the title, verified rule did not trigger
in Herald transcript.
- Verified X-Herald-Rules is still: <2>, <3>
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 817
Summary:
Provide a catchall mechanism to find unprotected writes.
- Depends on D758.
- Similar to WriteOnHTTPGet stuff from Facebook's stack.
- Since we have a small number of storage mechanisms and highly structured
read/write pathways, we can explicitly answer the question "is this page
performing a write?".
- Never allow writes without CSRF checks.
- This will probably break some things. That's fine: they're CSRF
vulnerabilities or weird edge cases that we can fix. But don't push to Facebook
for a few days unless you're prepared to deal with this.
- **>>> MEGADERP: All Conduit write APIs are currently vulnerable to CSRF!
<<<**
Test Plan:
- Ran some scripts that perform writes (scripts/search indexers), no issues.
- Performed normal CSRF submits.
- Added writes to an un-CSRF'd page, got an exception.
- Executed conduit methods.
- Did login/logout (this works because the logged-out user validates the
logged-out csrf "token").
- Did OAuth login.
- Did OAuth registration.
Reviewers: pedram, andrewjcg, erling, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran,
codeblock
Commenters: pedram
CC: aran, epriestley, pedram
Differential Revision: 777
Summary:
- Allow the console to handle abstract classes correctly.
- Move paste dictionary generation to an abstract base class.
- Add paste.create.
- Add 'objectName', 'parentPHID', and 'content' to Paste info dictionaries
(you can use filePHID with file.download to get the content but I think just
always sending it back is reasonable).
Test Plan:
- Use paste.create to create new pastes.
- Used paste.info to get existing pastes.
- Checked console UI to make sure "paste." didn't show up or anything
silly/dumb like that.
- Tried to call the method "paste" and got the right exception.
Reviewed By: codeblock
Reviewers: codeblock, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, codeblock
Differential Revision: 747
Summary:
Provides a new workflow for making it non-horrible to install certificates.
Basically you run "arc install-certificate" and then copy/paste a short token
off a webpage and it does the ~/.arcrc edits for you.
Test Plan:
Installed certificates, used bad tokens, hit rate limiting.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran
Differential Revision: 460
Summary: add a conduit method to enable querying revisions' phid from
their revision_IDs, and another one to update the task->revision assoc.
Test Plan: for querying revision_phid method, tested empty, one, and two
revisions in the query. For the one to update the task->revision assoc,
I have another diff in facebook which verified it add and remove assoc
correctly.
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, epriestley
CC:
Differential Revision: 165
Summary:
Allow Conduit methods to retrieve the authoritative, logged-in user
identity.
Test Plan:
Ran user.whoami (an authenticated method) and got my info back. Ran
conduit.connect (an unauthenticated method) and the world did not explode.
Reviewed By: tuomaspelkonen
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen
CC: tuomaspelkonen, epriestley
Differential Revision: 113
Summary: improve the error message by adding reference to documentation.
Test Plan: remove the certificate in .arcrc and run arc diff to see if
the improved error message shows up.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC:
Differential Revision: 53
Summary: differential.find was fataling in the console because of a bad
constant, and you couldn't submit requests requiring authentication because
the auth stuff didn't know to look for web sessions. Resolve these issues.
Test Plan: Hit differential.find successfully, ran a user.find query from
the web console without issues.
Reviewers: tomo
CC:
Differential Revision: 31
