Summary: Icon in a circle. Base class, not much in the way of color choices.
Test Plan:
UIExamples, Chrome.
{F1062027}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15034
Summary: Ref T10054. Without `max-width`, Safari can make this too large with a long project name (maybe because of `table-cell`?).
Test Plan: Saw normal-width menu instead of huge menu on very long project.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15046
Summary:
Ref T10163. If you right-click the suggestion menu, just eat it. I don't think we can really choose a different behavior reasonably, or that users have any reason to do this.
I'm leaving "clicking the header dismisses it", I think that behavior is fine and reasonable.
Test Plan: Control-clicked a suggestion menu, didn't trigger a suggestion.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10163
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15042
Summary: Ref T10163. When a user autocompletes, add a space for them, unless they already added a comma, colon, or space themsevles.
Test Plan: Autocompleted `@dog`, got `@dog `. Autocompleted `@epriestley,` got `@epriestley,`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10163
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15041
Summary:
Ref T10163. Currently, we don't activate on indented lines, but were too aggressive about this, and would not activate on lines like ` - Hey, @user...`, where we should.
Instead, don't activate on indented lines if there's only an indent (i.e., `#` probably means enumerated list).
Also, if results don't have autocompletes (rare but possible with projects missing slugs), improve behavior.
Test Plan:
- Typed ` #a`, got no autocomplete.
- Missing slug thing is a pain to test locallly, `#1 z z z z` reproduces in production. I'll just verify it there.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10163
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15040
Summary:
Ref T10163. When we think the user has finished typing a word (because they typed a space, period, or other similar characters) and nothing else they might type could possibly change the outcome (usually because the words they have typed already match nothing), just deactivate the autocomplete.
As a special case, if the word they have typed already select exactly one result, //and// they have already typed exactly that result, assume they just typed it from memory and deactivate.
Test Plan:
- Typed `@dog qwer zxcv` and saw autocomplete deactivate on the space before `z` (on my local install, `@dog` is ambiguous but `@dog qwer` matches nothing).
- Typed `@epriestley ` and saw autocomplete deactivate on space.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10163
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15039
Summary: Ref T10163. In cases like Conpherence, the autocompleter can currently render off the bottom of the screen. Put it above if it would be offscreen.
Test Plan: {F1062286}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10163
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15038
Summary: Ref T10163. Activate on `@d`, not just `@`. Note that if you type `@d` and then press delete once so you're left with `@`, we stay active (and show the "type a username" hint).
Test Plan:
- Typed `@`, no completer.
- Typed `d`, got completer.
- Typed delete, still had completer, now showing hint prompt.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10163
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15037
Summary:
Ref T10163. Some characters are almost certainly punctuation or markup rather than autocomplete requests. Immediately cancel any active autocomplete when the user types one of these.
Note that some of these are also suffix characters. If you type `@dog,`, you have until the next character to decide you actually mean to autocomplete. Once you type something else we deactivate.
If you type `#dog#` or `##`, we deactivate immediately.
Test Plan: Typed `@dog#`, etc.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10163
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15036
Summary: Ref T10163. This allows activation in blockquotes or after `NOTE:`, for consistency.
Test Plan: Typed `>@dog`, etc., got autocomplete.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10163
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15035
Summary:
Ref T10163.
- If a user types an autocomplete character ("@" or "#") and then a space, deactivate immediately (probably an ordered list).
- If a user types an autocomplete character indented on a line with no other prior text, don't activate (probably an ordered list or code block).
Test Plan:
Typed:
- `# `, saw immediate deactivation.
- ` #`, saw no activation in the first place.
- `#x`, saw activation.
- `asdf #x`, saw activation.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10163
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15033
Summary: Ref T10163. I would still sometimes not get a replacement after clicking with the delayed blur. This seems to fix the issue more consistently: instead of listening for a click event (which fires after the blur), listen for a mousedown event (which fires before the blur).
Test Plan: Observed consistent selection via mouse locally.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10163
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15032
Summary:
Ref T10163.
- If you click a result, we get a blur before your click hits, and deactivate before the click can work. Instead, wait before responding to blur.
- Use the standard sort handler which puts unixnames over human names. Also use the standard filter which deals with disabled users not matching unless they're the only match.
Test Plan:
- Clicked a result, got a replacement.
- Named myself "dog dog", typed "@dog", user "@dog" was now first match despite me being "@admin".
- Used normal typeaheads to make sure I didn't break sort handler.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10163
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15031
Summary: Motivate your employees with inspirational quotes. A new quote every day!
Test Plan: So inspirational.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15026
Summary: Ref T10054. People, projects, and instances no longer use icon nav, so we can get rid of it in favor of profile menus.
Test Plan: Grepped for everything, looked through workboards/profiles again.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15022
Summary:
Ref T10054. This makes the profile menu full-height. It uses two pieces of dark magic:
- `calc()`, which allows you to do math in CSS.
- The `vh` unit, which is CSS for "viewport height".
Apparently this kind of stuff just works now? CSS got good at some point?
Test Plan:
- Page looks correct in Safari, Chrome, Firefox.
- Checked `caniuse.com` for `vh` and `calc()`, saw they're supported?
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15017
Summary:
Ref T10054. I haven't done any of the big-picture layout stuff yet, but this should get look-and-feel somewhere in the ballpark of reasonablness, I think.
Major missing stuff:
- No "collapse" state or action yet.
- Menu is not full-height (requires changes to the rendering pipeline).
Test Plan: {F1060941}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15016
Summary: Ref T3725. This probably has 900,000 bugs. This will need updates for subprojects/milestones.
Test Plan:
- Tested very gently in Safari, Firefox and Chrome.
- Reasonable inputs appear to work.
- Clicking, escape, tab, return, arrow keys work OK?
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3725
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15029
Summary: Ref T10054. Allows users to drag menu items to reorder them.
Test Plan: Reordered a project menu.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10054
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15011
Summary: Fixes T10139. This clarification seems reasonable to me.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a revision with context.
- Clicked "Show All Context".
- Saw "All Context Shown".
{F1060624}
{F1060625}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10139
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15009
Summary: Fixes T10116.
Test Plan:
- Prior to patch: Control/Command + Enter submitted form but ignored actions.
- After patch: verifid command + enter submits actions.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14991
Summary:
Ref T10010. Ref T5819. General alignment of the stars:
- There were some hacks in Conduit around stripping `fa-...` off icons when reading and writing that I wanted to get rid of.
- We probably have room for a subtitle in the new heavy nav, and using the icon name is a good starting point (and maybe good enough on its own?)
- The project list was real bad looking with redundant tag/names, now it is very slightly less bad looking with non-redundant types?
- Some installs will want to call Milestones something else, and this gets us a big part of the way there.
- This may slightly help to reinforce "tag" vs "policy" vs "group" stuff?
---
I'm letting installs have enough rope to shoot themselves in the foot (e.g., define 100 icons). It isn't the end of the world if they reuse icons, and is clearly their fault.
I think the cases where 100 icons will break down are:
- Icon selector dialog may get very unwieldy.
- Query UI will be pretty iffy/huge with 100 icons.
We could improve these fairly easily if an install comes up with a reasonable use case for having 100 icons.
---
The UI on the icon itself in the list views is a little iffy -- mostly, it's too saturated/bold.
I'd ideally like to try either:
- rendering a "shade" version (i.e. lighter, less-saturated color); or
- rendering a "shade" tag with just the icon in it.
However, there didn't seem to be a way to do the first one right now (`fa-example sh-blue` doesn't work) and the second one had weird margins/padding, so I left it like this for now. I figure we can clean it up once we build the thick nav, since that will probably also want an identical element.
(I don't want to render a full tag with the icon + name since I think that's confusing -- it looks like a project/object tag, but is not.)
Test Plan:
{F1049905}
{F1049906}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: 20after4, Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T5819, T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14918
Summary:
Fixes T9323. Two minor fixes:
- On the first commit, don't render a downward line.
- Clean up a 1px spacing issue that had cropped up a while ago when we added icons or something, I think.
Test Plan:
Before:
{F1057248}
After:
{F1057249}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9323
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14974
Summary: Creates a new next/previous UI for PhamePosts, and adds a setFoot to PHUIDocumentViewPro for future use in other apps.
Test Plan:
Test first, next, last posts on Phame in mobile, desktop, and tablet breakpoints.
{F1050152}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14919
Summary: Ref T10004. This control doesn't disable visually or behaviorally, e.g. when locked in an EditEngine configuration.
Test Plan:
- Locked field for Projects.
- Reviewed form in EditEngine.
- Created/edited a project.
- Swapped default.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14911
Summary:
Ref T10010. This has a lot of UI/UX problems but I think it:
- technically allows subproject creation;
- technically allows milestone creation;
- doesn't let users unwittingly destroy their installs (probably).
Test Plan:
- Created milestones.
- Created subprojects.
- Created and edited normal projects.
- Observed some reasonable interactions (e.g., you can't create milestones for a milestone or edit a superproject's members).
- Observed plenty of silly/confusing interactions that need additional work.
{F1046657}
{F1046658}
{F1046655}
{F1046656}
{F1046654}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14904
Summary: Ref T10004. This primarily supports moving Phame to EditEngine.
Test Plan: {F1045166}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14887
Summary: I'll revert this within 24 hours, before I promote.
Test Plan: Had completely functional but greatly enhanced Phabricator experience in Firefox, Safari and Chrome.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14884
Summary: Ref T8980. Previously, if you had like `T123T123T123` and waved your mouse over them, we wouldn't move the card. Now, move the card.
Test Plan: Waved mouse. Saw the card move.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8980
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14881
Summary: Ref T8980. This calculation was not quite right and you could sneak one off screen if you tried carefully.
Test Plan: Couldn't sneak one off screen anymore.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8980
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14880
Summary:
Ref T8980. Move away from events to EngineExtensions.
This also simplifies hovercards a bit:
- Removes tasks from revision cards.
- Removes blockers/blocked from task cards.
- Removes "Send Message" from user cards.
These mostly felt cluttery to me. Open to arguments to retain them. I think we can make better use of the space, though (e.g., flags, projects + board columns).
Test Plan:
- Viewed people, task, revision, commit and project hovercards.
{F1043256}
{F1043257}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8980
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14878
Summary: Ref T5240. We don't currently use any of these options and I don't think we have any plans to use them. Strip them out for now to make fixing drag-and-drop stuff easier.
Test Plan: Grepped for removed stuff, no hits.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T5240
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14864
Summary:
Ref T10004. This might be a little too funky or magical, but is probably not necessary too often and easier than doing new layout with the CSS.
Also make the desktop icons a little meatier.
Test Plan: Swiped things away on mobile. Clicked things away on desktop.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14857
Summary:
Fixes T1895. Now that we have on-demand prviews, we can use them on mobile. On mobile:
- don't show live previews;
- only save drafts every 10 seconds.
Also, show fewer remarkup buttons on mobile to try to make sure the more important ones (preview, e.g.) fit.
Test Plan:
- Made window narrower and wider to trigger preview/no-preview behavior.
- Used DarkConsole to verify request rate.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T1895
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14856
Summary:
Ref T3967. This gives us a reasonable baseline for doing remarkup previews inline in all contexts, and works in weird/constrained context including:
- inline comments;
- conpherence; and
- custom fields.
It would be nicer to go beyond this in contexts like Phame posts, but this is a start, at least.
Test Plan:
{F1040877}
{F1040878}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T3967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14855
Summary:
Fixes T10039. We add text to textareas in two cases:
- Users clicking assitance buttons in Remarkup text areas.
- Drag-and-drop file uploads.
In case (1), it makes sense to highlight the text (it shows the user what we inserted, and lets them undo the action easily if it isn't what they wanted).
In case (2), it does not. Users almost never want to delete or edit a file reference. It is slightly nice to have the reference as a visual callout, but I don't think this is a big deal.
Change the behavior so that we highlight only for remarkup buttons, not for drag-and-drop files.
Test Plan:
- Clicked an "isnert quote" button on remarkup assist area, got highlighted example text.
- Dragged and dropped a file, got text inserted with no highlight.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14851
Summary: Adds basic NUX to Dashboards, Herald, Repositories, Maniphest. Note Herald and Dashboard Panels don't fine the nux for some reason, assume they will when modernized?
Test Plan: Read text, click buttons.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14844
Summary: Currently it's difficult to notice posts may be much longer than the summary (in most cases, actually), Adds a consistent "Read More" link to the full post. Also made sure "violet" was more consistantly used.
Test Plan:
Review summaries in Phame
{F1031799}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14827
Summary:
Fixes T10012. The permissions here are little weird: you need edit permission on the //configurations//, not the //engines//. I was checking edit permission on the engines only.
I should possibly make this a bit more consistent, the engine edit permission is just very convenient to use to enforce object create permission right now. I'll likely clean this up after T9789.
Test Plan:
- Tried to reorder forms as a less-privileged user, got proper policy errors.
- Reordered forms normally as a regular user.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10012
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14824
Summary: Fixes T9871. Ref T10004. These won't win any awards but it fixes them being incredibly weird and confusing.
Test Plan:
{F1029090}
- Tried to use controls, got reasonable behavior.
- Used normal controls to make sure I didn't break anything.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9871, T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14814
Summary:
Ref T10004. After a user logs in, we send them to the "next" URI cookie if there is one, but currently don't always do a very good job of selecting a "next" URI, especially if they tried to do something with a dialog before being asked to log in.
In particular, if a logged-out user clicks an action like "Edit Blocking Tasks" on a Maniphest task, the default behavior is to send them to the standalone page for that dialog after they log in. This can be pretty confusing.
See T2691 and D6416 for earlier efforts here. At that time, we added a mechanism to //manually// override the default behavior, and fixed the most common links. This worked, but I'd like to fix the //default// beahvior so we don't need to remember to `setObjectURI()` correctly all over the place.
ApplicationEditor has also introduced new cases which are more difficult to get right. While we could get them right by using the override and being careful about things, this also motivates fixing the default behavior.
Finally, we have better tools for fixing the default behavior now than we did in 2013.
Instead of using manual overrides, have JS include an "X-Phabricator-Via" header in Ajax requests. This is basically like a referrer header, and will contain the page the user's browser is on.
In essentially every case, this should be a very good place (and often the best place) to send them after login. For all pages currently using `setObjectURI()`, it should produce the same behavior by default.
I'll remove the `setObjectURI()` mechanism in the next diff.
Test Plan: Clicked various workflow actions while logged out, saw "next" get set to a reasonable value, was redirected to a sensible, non-confusing page after login (the page with whatever button I clicked on it).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14804
Summary:
Ref T9992. This is a step on the path to getting EditEngine working in Badges, Projects and Calendar.
This doesn't add a new `EditField` for icons yet, just standardizes the old stuff. New stuff is more general and I saved 150 lines of code.
I put the endpoint in Files because the similar "choose a profile picture" endpoint will definitely go there, and this endpoint might eventually feature, like, "draw your own icon~~" or something.
Test Plan:
- Created events, projects and badges with custom icons.
- Edited events, projects and badges, changing their icons.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9992
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14799
Summary:
Ref T9908. Fixes T6205.
This is largely some refactoring to improve the code. The new structure is:
- Each EditField has zero or one "submit" (normal edit form) controls.
- Each EditField has zero or one "comment" (stacked actions) controls.
- If we want more than one in the future, we'd just add two fields.
- Each EditField can have multiple EditTypes which provide Conduit transactions.
- EditTypes are now lower-level and less involved on the Submit/Comment pathways.
Test Plan:
- Added and removed projects and subscribers.
- Changed task statuses.
- In two windows: added some subscribers in one, removed different ones in the other. The changes did not conflict.
- Applied changes via Conduit.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6205, T9908
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14789
