Summary:
See brief discussion in D18554. All the index tables are the same for every application (and, at this point, seem unlikely to change) and we never actually pass these objects around (they're only used internally).
In some other cases (like Transactions) not every application has the same tables (for example, Differential has extra field for inline comments), and/or we pass the objects around (lots of stuff uses `$xactions` directly).
However, in this case, and in Edges, we don't interact with any representation of the database state directly in much of the code, and it doesn't change from application to application.
Just automatically define document, field, and ngram tables for anything which implements `FerretInterface`. This makes the query and index logic a tiny bit messier but lets us delete a ton of boilerplate classes.
Test Plan: Indexed objects, searched for objects. Same results as before with much less code. Ran `bin/storage upgrade`, got a clean bill of health.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18559
Summary:
Ref T12819. Currently, under the Ferret engine, we query each application's index separately and then aggregate the results.
At the moment, results are aggregated by type first, then by actual rank. For example, all the revisions appear first, then all the tasks.
Instead, surface the internal ranking data from the underlying query and sort by it.
Test Plan: Searched for "A B" with a task named "A B" and a revision named "A". Saw task first. Broadly, saw mixed task and revision order in result sets.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18551
Summary:
Ref T12819. I started trying to get individual engines to drive these constraints (e.g., `ManiphestTaskQuery` can do most of the work) but this is a big pain, especially since most engines don't support "any owner" or "no owner", and not everything has an owner, and so on and so on. Going down this path would have meant a huge pile of stub functions everywhere, I think.
Instead, drive these through the main engine using the fulltext document table, which already has everything we need to apply these constraints in a uniform way.
Also tweak some parts of query construction and result ordering.
Test Plan: Searched for documents by author, owner, unowned, any owner, tags, subscribers, fulltext in global search. Got sensible results without any application-specific code.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18550
Summary:
See PHI57. For example, a query for "ios, only()" finds tags tasked with iOS, exactly, and no other tags.
I called this "only()" instead of "exact()" because we use the term/function "Exact" elsewhere with a different meaning, e.g. in Differential.
Test Plan:
Basic query for a tag:
{F5168857}
Same query with "only", finds tasks tagged with only that tag:
{F5168858}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18543
Summary: Ref T12819. "Relevance" here just means "how many of your search terms are present in the title?" but that's about the best we can do anyway.
Test Plan: Indexed tasks "A B", "A Z", "Z B", and "Z Z" (all with "A B" in comments). Searched for "A B". Got results ranked in the listed order, with "A B" as the most relevant hit for query "A B".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18539
Summary: Ref T12819. Move these out of the core engine into the Ferret engine. In the future different applications can define different functions, like "summary:..." or whatever. This may get more formalization when I possibly do "author:" and such some time down the road.
Test Plan: Searched for "title:...". Searched for "dog:...", got a useful error.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18536
Summary:
Ref T12819. Push more of the magic `' '` stuff into the engine and simplify calls to ngram construction.
Also fixes a bug where a task with title "apple banana" and description "cherry doughnut" could match query "banana cherry" by separating separate term segments with newlines instead of spaces.
Test Plan:
- Indexed some objects.
- Searched (term, substring, quoted terms).
- Viewed index in database.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18534
Summary: Ref T12819. Earlier I separated some ngram code into an "ngram engine" hoping to share it across the simple Ngrams stuff and the full Ferret stuff, but they actually use slightly different rules. Just pull more of this stuff into FerretEngine to reduce the number of moving pieces and the amount of code duplication.
Test Plan: Searched for terms, rebuilt indexes.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18533
Summary: See PHI46. The `core:` function means "find results in either the title or body, but not other auxiliary fields like comments".
Test Plan: Searched for text present in the title (yes), body (yes), and comments (no) with the `core:...` prefix.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18514
Summary:
Ref T12819. Adds (hacky, hard-coded) field support (for now, only for "title").
I've written this so `title:quick ferret` is the same as `title:quick title:ferret`. I think this is what users probably mean.
You can do the other thing as `ferret title:quick`, or `title:quick all:ferret`.
Test Plan: Searched for `title:x`, `title:"x"`, `title:~"x"`, etc. Searched for "garbage:y", got an exception since that's not a recognized function. Searched for `title:x y`, saw both do title search.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18503
Summary:
Ref T12819. Supports negating search terms, e.g. "apple -honeycrisp".
When negating a term, we're a little more strict about what can match (that is, what can //prevent// a document from being returned) since it's easy for a user to type "apple -honeycrisp -honey -crisp -crispies -olcrispers -honeyyums" to keep refining their search, but hard/impossible to split apart an overboard term.
Test Plan:
- Ran `apple -smith`, `apple -"granny smith"`, etc.
- Verified `phone -tact` does not exclude `phone contact`.
- (In theory, `phone -~tact` would, but the parser currently doesn't support this, and I'm not champing at the bit to add support.)
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18502
Summary:
Ref T12819. Distinguishes between "term" queries and "substring" queries, and tries to match them correctly most of the time. For example:
- `example` matches "example", obviously.
- `~amp` matches "example", but `amp` does not.
- `examples` matches "example" through stemming.
- `"examples"` does not match "example" (quoted text does not stem).
- `"an examp"` does not match "an example" (quoted text is still term text).
- `~"an examp"` matches "an example" (quoted, substring-operator text uses substring search).
Test Plan: Ran searches similar to the above, they seemed to do what they should.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18500
Summary:
Ref T12819. Depends on D18492. Instead of passing a raw query into the Query layer, parse it first.
This allows the query layer to figure out which parts should be substring vs term match, and would allow the SearchEngine layer to do `author:...` eventually by picking it out before sending it to the Ferret engine.
Test Plan: Ran some Ferret queries. They work like before, except that nonsense like `-+"quack"` raises an exception now.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18499
Summary:
Ref T12819. I gave this stuff a sweet code name because all the terms related to "fulltext" and "search" already mean 5 different things. It, uh, ferrets out documents for you?
I'm building this to work a lot like the existing ngram index, which seems to work pretty well. If this sticks, it will auto-resolve the join issue (in T12443) by letting us do the entire thing locally in a JOIN and thus dodge a lot of mess.
This index gets built alongside other indexes, but only shows up in the UI if you have prototypes enabled. If you do, it appears under the existing fulltext field in Maniphest. No existing functionality is affected or disrupted.
NOTE: The query engine half of this is still EXTREMELY primitive, and this probably performs worse than the existing field for now. If this doesn't show obvious signs of being awful on `secure` I'll improve that in followup changes.
Test Plan:
Indexed my tasks, ran some simple queries, got the results I wanted, even for queries "ko", "k", "v0.1".
{F5147746}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12819, T12443
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18484
Summary:
Fixes T12753. See that task for reproduction instructions.
We add a `GROUP BY` clause to queries with an "ANCESTOR" edge constraint only if the constaint has more than one PHID, but this is incorrect: the same row can be found twice by an ANCESTOR query if task T is tagged with both "B" and "C", children of "A", and the user queries for "tasks in A".
Instead, always add GROUP BY for ANCESTOR queries.
Test Plan:
- Followed test plan in T12753.
- Saw proper paging controls after change.
- Saw `GROUP BY` in DarkConsole.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12753
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18012
Summary:
Ref T12337. Ref T5873. This provides a generic "edge.search" method which feels like other "verison 3" `*.search` methods.
The major issues here are:
1. Edges use constants internally, which aren't great for an API.
2. A lot of edges are internal and probably not useful to query.
3. Edges don't have a real "id", so paginating them properly is challenging.
I've solved these things like this:
- Edges must opt-in to being available via Conduit by providing a human-readable key (like "mention" instead of "52"). This solvs (1) and (2).
- I faked a mostly-reasonable behavior for paginating.
Test Plan:
Ran various valid and invalid searches. Paginated a large search. Reviewed UI.
{F3651818}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12337, T5873
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17462
Summary: Ref T11773. This is an initial first step toward a more complete solution, but should make the worst case much less bad: prior to this change, the worst case was "30 second exeuction timeout". After this patch, the worst case is "no results + explanatory message", which is strictly better.
Test Plan:
Made all feed stories fail policy checks, loaded home page.
- Before adding overheating: 9,600 queries / 20 seconds
- After adding overheating: 376 queries / 800ms
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11773
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16735
Summary:
Fixes T8911. This corrects several issues which could crop up if a calendar event query matched more results than the query limit:
- The desired order was not applied by the SearchEngine -- it applies the first builtin order instead. Provide a proper builtin order.
- When we generate ghosts, we can't do limiting in the database because we may select and then immediately discard a large number of parent events which are outside of the query range.
- For now, just don't limit results to get the behavior correct.
- This may need to be refined eventually to improve performance.
- When trimming events, we could trim parents and fail to generate ghosts from them. Separate parent events out first.
- Try to simplify some logic.
Test Plan: An "Upcoming" dashboard panel with limit 10 and the main Calendar "Upcoming Events" UI now show the same results.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8911
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16289
Summary:
Ref T10537. These are objects which are bound to some external object, like a Maniphest task which is a representation of a GitHub issue.
This doesn't do much yet and may change, but my thinking is:
- I'm putting these on-object instead of on edges because I think we want to actively change the UI for them (e.g., clearly call out that the object is bridged) but don't want every page to need to do extra queries in the common case where zero bridged objects exist anywhere in the system.
- I'm making these one-to-one, more or less: an issue can't be bridged to a bunch of tasks, nor can a bunch of tasks be bridged to a single issue. Pretty sure this makes sense? I can't come up with any reasonable, realistic cases where you want a single GitHub issue to publish to multiple different tasks in Maniphest.
- Technically, one type of each bridgable object could be bridged, but I expect this to never actually occur. Hopefully.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade, loaded some pages.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15502
Summary:
Ref T10188. If you issue certain queries which use reverse ordering (like "All tasks, oldest update to newest update") and then try to page forward, we build the paging clause without reversing the column order correctly.
For example, the ordering of "oldest update to newest update" is "dateModified ASC, id ASC", so the second page should include an "id > X" query. Currently, this builds as "id < X" incorrectly instead.
The cause of this is just a failure to re-reverse a reversing flag when constructing the paging clause.
Test Plan:
- Queried tasks by update, oldest to newest, with no grouping, etc.
- Paged to second page.
- After change, got a valid second page with a good query in the Services tab.
- Made some other normal queries.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10188
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15076
Summary:
Fixes T10135. When the viewer is a member of no projects, specify the constraint type as a new "EMPTY" type.
When a query has an "EMPTY" constraint, fail fast with no results.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a viewerprojects() query result set as a user in no projects.
- Before patch: got a lot of hits. After patch: no hits.
- Viewed a normal result set, no changes.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10135
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15003
Summary:
Ref T10010. I think this is the desired/expected default behavior (e.g., searching for "Maniphest" should find tasks in any subproject or sprint of that project).
I'll probably add an "exact(...)" function later to mean "only the Maniphest superproject, exactly, not any of its children".
Test Plan:
- Added and executed unit tests.
- Ran various queries from the web UI.
- Got sensible-seeming results.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14910
Summary:
Ref T9979. This uses ngrams (specifically, trigrams) to build a reasonably efficient index for substring matching. Specifically, for a package like "Example", with ID 123, we store rows like this:
```
< ex, 123>
<exa, 123>
<xam, 123>
<amp, 123>
<mpl, 123>
<ple, 123>
<le , 123>
```
When the user searches for `exam`, we join this table for packages with tokens `exa` and `xam`. MySQL can do this a lot more efficiently than it can process a `LIKE "%exam%"` query against a huge table.
When the user searches for a one-letter or two-letter string, we only search the beginnings of words. This is probably what they want, the only thing we can do quickly, and a reasonable/expected behavior for typeaheads.
Test Plan:
- Ran storage upgrades and search indexer.
- Searched for stuff with "name contains".
- Used typehaead and got sensible results.
- Searched for `aabbccddeeffgghhiijjkkllmmnnooppqqrrssttuuvvwwxxyyzz` and saw only 16 joins.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9979
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14846
Summary:
Fixes T6864. This creates a sort of busy menu but I think that's proably fine -- users are opting into activating these fields for search anyway.
In the future, we could refine this as, e.g.:
- don't show these options in the dropdown;
- do show them on some new "http prefilling" sort of page;
- then you access them as an advanced user with `?order=secret-magic`.
But I'm not going to bother for now.
Test Plan: Ordered by an int field, then reversed the order.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6864
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14800
Summary:
Ref T9964. Adds a new-style "owners.search" endpoint, and an extension for customfields.
Puts enough indirection in place to give us nice, consistent "custom.key" user-facing keys instead of "std:custom:owners:na0shf9a8dfdsafl" junk.
Test Plan:
- Searched Owners via API.
- Searched by ID.
- Ordered by custom fields.
- Reviewed API docs.
- Used normal search with ordering.
- Viewed custom field values in search results.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9964
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14758
Summary:
Fixes T8743. Fixes T8746. When running queries with the omnipotent viewer and no explicit space constraints, don't add implicit space constraints.
This prevents us from fataling when running older pre-space migrations and trying to load space-aware objects.
Test Plan: Manually ran migrations with `--trace`, verified no `WHERE spacePHID = ...`.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: eadler, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8743, T8746
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13542
Summary:
Ref T8731. I think the issue is that some `ProjectQuery` (without needImages()) populates the query workspace, then the "real" one hits the workspace.
Instead, only populate the workspace from ObjectQuery, so we know that objects in the workspace always have whatever ObjectQuery attaches to them.
Test Plan: Verified this didn't destroy the cache hitrate, but I can't repro the original issue locally per se.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8731
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13516
Summary:
Ref T8631. The query plan for feed stories is really bad right now, because we miss caches we should be hitting:
- The workspace cache is stored at each query, so adjacent queries can't benefit from the cache (only subqueries). Feed has primarily sibling queries.
- There is no technical reason to do this. Store the workspace cache on the root query, so sibling queries can hit it.
- In `ObjectQuery`, we check the workspace once, then load all the PHIDs. When the PHIDs are a mixture of transactions and objects, we always miss the workspace and load the objects twice.
- Instead, check the workspace after loading each type of object.
- `HandleQuery` does not set itself as the parent query for `ObjectQuery`, so handles never hit the workspace cache.
- Pass it, so they can hit the workspace cache.
- Feed's weird `PhabricatorFeedStory::loadAllFromRows()` method does not specify a parent query on its object/handle queries.
- Just declare the object query to be the "root" query until this eventually gets cleaned up.
Test Plan: Saw queries for each object drop from 4-6x to 1x in `/feed/`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8631
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13479
Summary:
Ref T8575. Because orderable columns need to build custom fields, they are relatively expensive to build. Use the request cache.
(The request cache is technically more correct than `static`, because configuration may change between requests and we may eventually reuse interpreters.)
Test Plan: Saw home page time drop 39% (from 462ms to 283ms).
Reviewers: btrahan, avivey
Reviewed By: avivey
Subscribers: avivey, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8575
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13322
Summary: Ref T8575. We check if users can see applications frequently, and caching on the Query isn't especially effective. Use the new Request cache instead.
Test Plan:
- Saw `/feed/` drop 7% (from ~830ms to ~770ms) on profiles.
Reviewers: btrahan, avivey
Reviewed By: avivey
Subscribers: avivey, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8575
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13321
Summary: All classes should extend from some other class. See D13275 for some explanation.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13283
Summary:
Ref T4345. This error is per object-type in the query implementations, not a mail/permissions issue.
Without `didRejectResult()`, we can't distinguish between "restricted" and "unknown" for objects filtered by `willFilterPage()`.
- Call `didRejectResult()` on commits.
- Make `didRejectResult()` handle both existing policy exceptions and filtering.
- Recover from partial objects (like commits) which are missing attached data required to figure out policies.
Test Plan: Saw "Restricted Diffusion Commit" instead of "Unknown Object (Diffusion Commit)" when viewing nonvisible commit handle in Maniphest.
Reviewers: btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4345
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13289
Summary:
Ref T8377. This adds a standard disable/enable feature to Spaces, with a couple of twists:
- You can't create new stuff in an archived space, and you can't move stuff into an archived space.
- We don't show results from an archived space by default in ApplicationSearch queries. You can still find these objects if you explicitly search for "Spaces: <the archived space>".
So this is a "put it in a box in the attic" sort of operation, but that seems fairly nice/reasonable.
Test Plan:
- Archived and activated spaces.
- Used ApplicationSearch, which omitted archived objects by default but allowed searches for them, specifically, to succeed.
- Tried to create objects into an archived space (this is not allowed).
- Edited objects in an archived space (this is OK).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8377
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13238
Summary: Ref T8441. Ref T7715. Ref T7909. Clean up all the ordering and grouping hacks in Maniphest so we can drive it through normal infrastructure, move it to SearchField, introduce Spaces, and eventually modernize the Conduit API.
Test Plan:
- Executed all grouping/ordering queries, including custom queries.
- Forced execution with old aliases; got modern results.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7909, T7715, T8441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13197
Summary:
Ref T8441. Ref T7715. Automatically generate a modern "Order" control in ApplicationSearch for engines which fully support SearchField.
Notably, this allows the standard "Order" control to automatically support custom field orders. We do this in Maniphest today, but in an ad-hoc way.
Test Plan: Performed order-by queries in Almanac (Services), Pholio, Files, People, Projects, and Paste.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7715, T8441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13193
Summary:
Ref T8441. Ref T7715. For modern Query classes, automatically make subscriber queries and SearchField integrations work.
In particular, we can just drive this query with EdgeLogic and don't need to do anything specific on these Query classes beyond making sure they're implemented in a way that picks up all of the EdgeLogic clauses.
Test Plan:
- Searched for subscribers in Pholio, Files, Paste, and Projects.
- Searched for all other fields in Projects to check that Query changes are OK.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7715, T8441
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13191
Summary:
Ref T8424. No UI or interesting behavior yet, but integrates Spaces checks:
- `PolicyFilter` now checks Spaces.
- `PolicyAwareQuery` now automatically adds Spaces constraints.
There's one interesting design decision here: **spaces are stronger than automatic capabilities**. That means that you can't see a task in a space you don't have permission to access, //even if you are the owner//.
I //think// this is desirable. Particularly, we need to do this in order to exclude objects at the query level, which potentially makes policy filtering for spaces hugely more efficient. I also like Spaces being very strong, conceptually.
It's possible that we might want to change this; this would reduce our access to optimizations but might be a little friendlier or make more sense to users later on.
For now, at least, I'm pursuing the more aggressive line. If we stick with this, we probably need to make some additional UI affordances (e.g., show when an owner can't see a task).
This also means that you get a hard 404 instead of a policy exception when you try to access something in a space you can't see. I'd slightly prefer to show you a policy exception instead, but think this is generally a reasonable tradeoff to get the high-performance filtering at the Query layer.
Test Plan:
- Added and executed unit tests.
- Put objects in spaces and viewed them with multiple users.
- Made the default space visible/invisible, viewed objects.
- Checked the services panel and saw `spacePHID` constraints.
- Verified that this adds only one query to each page.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8424
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13156
Summary: Ref T8099, Moves AphrontPagerView to PHUIPagerView, converts to standard PHUIButtons and adds some additional features for icon placement on buttons.
Test Plan: Tested Advanced Search and Searching files in Diffusion. Works as expected.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8342, T8099
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13092
Summary:
Fixes T6726. Currently, a file may be attached to itself (or to other files, ultimately forming a loop). In this case, we currently run around the loop forever trying to load all the files.
Instead, decline to load objects if we're inside a query which is already loading them. This produces the right policy result //and// completes in finite time.
Test Plan:
- Looped two files by writing `{F123}` and `{F124}` on the other files, respectively.
- Loaded `F123`.
- Saw long hang; used `debug.time-limit` to see huge stack trace instead.
- Wrote patch.
- `F123` now loads correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6726
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12756
Summary: See IRC. This got dropped in the order refactoring.
Test Plan: Ordered Maniphest search results by a custom field.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12614
