1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-25 16:22:43 +01:00
Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
719dd6d3f4 Remove the "search_documentfield" table
Summary: Ref T11741. See PHI1276. After the switch to "Ferret", this table has no remaining readers or writers.

Test Plan:
  - Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f`, no warnings.
  - Grepped for class name, table name, `stemmedCorpus` column; got no relevant hits.
  - Did a fulltext search.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T11741

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20549
2019-05-23 19:11:38 -07:00
Mukunda Modell
e41c25de50 Support multiple fulltext search clusters with 'cluster.search' config
Summary:
The goal is to make fulltext search back-ends more extensible, configurable and robust.

When this is finished it will be possible to have multiple search storage back-ends and
potentially multiple instances of each.

Individual instances can be configured with roles such as 'read', 'write' which control
which hosts will receive writes to the index and which hosts will respond to queries.

These two roles make it possible to have any combination of:

* read-only
* write-only
* read-write
* disabled

This 'roles' mechanism is extensible to add new roles should that be needed in the future.

In addition to supporting multiple elasticsearch and mysql search instances, this refactors
the connection health monitoring infrastructure from PhabricatorDatabaseHealthRecord and
utilizes the same system for monitoring the health of elasticsearch nodes. This will
allow Wikimedia's phabricator to be redundant across data centers (mysql already is,
elasticsearch should be as well).

The real-world use-case I have in mind here is writing to two indexes (two elasticsearch clusters
in different data centers) but reading from only one. Then toggling the 'read' property when
we want to migrate to the other data center (and when we migrate from elasticsearch 2.x to 5.x)

Hopefully this is useful in the upstream as well.

Remaining TODO:

* test cases
* documentation

Test Plan:
(WARNING) This will most likely require the elasticsearch index to be deleted and re-created due to schema changes.

Tested with elasticsearch versions 2.4 and 5.2 using the following config:

```lang=json
  "cluster.search": [
    {
      "type": "elasticsearch",
      "hosts": [
        {
          "host": "localhost",
          "roles": { "read": true, "write": true }
        }
      ],
      "port": 9200,
      "protocol": "http",
      "path": "/phabricator",
      "version": 5
    },
    {
      "type": "mysql",
      "roles": { "write": true }
     }
  ]

Also deployed the same changes to Wikimedia's production Phabricator instance without any issues whatsoever.
```

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley

Tags: #elasticsearch, #clusters, #wikimedia

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17384
2017-03-26 08:16:47 +00:00
epriestley
29a3cd5121 Add "Manual Activities", to tell administrators to rebuild the search index
Summary:
Ref T11922. After updating to HEAD of `master`, you need to manually rebuild the index. We don't do this during `bin/storage upgrade` because it can take a very long time (`secure.phabricator.com` took roughly an hour) and can happen while Phabricator is running.

However, if we don't warn users about this they'll just get a broken index unless they go read the changelog (or file an issue, then we tell them to go read the changelog).

This adds a very simple table for notes to administrators so we can write a "you need to go rebuild the index" note, then adds one.

Administrators clear the note by completing the activity and running `bin/config done reindex`. This isn't automatic because there are various strategies you can use to approach the issue, which I'll discuss in greater detail in the linked documentation.

Also, fix an issue where `bin/storage upgrade --apply <patch>` could try to re-mark an already-applied patch as applied.

Test Plan:
  - Ran storage ugrades.
  - Got instructions to rebuild search index.
  - Cleared instructions with `bin/config done reindex`.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Subscribers: avivey

Maniphest Tasks: T11922

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16965
2016-11-30 11:23:54 -08:00