Summary:
Ref T7707. Handles currently have a "status" field and a "disabled" field.
The "status" field has these possible values: "open", "closed", "1", "2". durp durp durp
Instead, do:
- status = <open, closed>
- availability = <full, partial, none, disabled>
I think these make more sense? And are a bit more general? And use the same kind of constants for all values!
Test Plan: Looked at all affected handles in all states (probably).
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7707
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12832
Summary: Seems reasonable? At least, it always matches however a user might think about documents (app or document). Unclear if "Diffusion" for example, are actually needed.
Test Plan: tested searching for "phriction", "wiki", "document", etc.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12577
Summary:
- Now that we have "browse", this is a much more reasonable control for random sets of things.
- The new explicit search scope selector reduces the need to fiddle with this field manually, too.
Test Plan:
{F379292}
{F379293}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12510
Summary:
Ref T5835. This is still completely made up (no payment integration), but you can "back" an initiative, type a number in the box, and generate a database row. You can then seach for backers and things you've backed and such.
Notable changes:
- Renamed "FundBacking" to "FundBacker". The former name was sort of because you can back things multiple times, but stuff like `$backings` was just too weird.
- I think that's it?
Test Plan:
- Backed an initiative.
- Viewed that I became a backer.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5835
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10486
Summary:
Ref T5835. This is all pretty boilerplate, and does not interact with Phortune at all yet.
You can create "Initiatives", which have a title and description, and support most of the expected infrastructure (policies, transactions, mentions, edges, appsearch, remakrup, etc).
Only notable decisions:
- Initiatives have an explicit owner. I think it's good to have a single clearly-responsible user behind an initiative.
- I think that's it?
Test Plan:
- Created an initiative.
- Edited an initiative.
- Changed application policy defaults.
- Searched for initiatives.
- Subscribed to an initiative.
- Opened/closed an initiative.
- Used `I123` and `{I123}` in remarkup.
- Destroyed an initiative.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5835
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10481
