Summary:
Depends on D19919. Ref T11351. This method appeared in D8802 (note that "get...Object" was renamed to "get...Transaction" there, so this method was actually "new" even though a method of the same name had existed before).
The goal at the time was to let Harbormaster post build results to Diffs and have them end up on Revisions, but this eventually got a better implementation (see below) where the Harbormaster-specific code can just specify a "publishable object" where build results should go.
The new `get...Object` semantics ultimately broke some stuff, and the actual implementation in Differential was removed in D10911, so this method hasn't really served a purpose since December 2014. I think that broke the Harbormaster thing by accident and we just lived with it for a bit, then Harbormaster got some more work and D17139 introduced "publishable" objects which was a better approach. This was later refined by D19281.
So: the original problem (sending build results to the right place) has a good solution now, this method hasn't done anything for 4 years, and it was probably a bad idea in the first place since it's pretty weird/surprising/fragile.
Note that `Comment` objects still have an unrelated method with the same name. In that case, the method ties the `Comment` storage object to the related `Transaction` storage object.
Test Plan: Grepped for `getApplicationTransactionObject`, verified that all remaining callsites are related to `Comment` objects.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T11351
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19920
Summary:
Depends on D19918. Ref T11351. In D19918, I removed all calls to this method. Now, remove all implementations.
All of these implementations just `return $timeline`, only the three sites in D19918 did anything interesting.
Test Plan: Used `grep willRenderTimeline` to find callsites, found none.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T11351
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19919
Summary: Ref T12738. Implements some modular behavior for Nuance commands.
Test Plan: {F4975322}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12738
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18011
Summary:
Ref T12738. This makes clicking "Throw In Trash" technically do something, sort of.
In Nuance, the default mode of operation for actions is asynchronous -- so you don't have to wait for a response from Twitter or GitHub after you mash the "send default reply tweet" / "close this pull request with a nice response" button and can move directly to the next item instead.
In the future, some operations will attempt to apply synchronously (e.g., local actions like "ignore this item forever"). This fakes our way through that for now.
There's also no connection to the action actually doing anything yet, but I'll probably rig that up next.
Test Plan: {F4975227}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12738
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18010
Summary:
Ref T12738. This is mostly just laying in groundwork and prerequisites, like the ability to query items by queue.
Eventually, this will become the main UI which staff use to process a queue of items. For now, it does nothing and renders nonsense.
This and probably the next big chunk of changes are all going to be made-up, nonfinal things that just make basic operations work until we have fundamental flows -- like "assign", "comment", "close" -- working at a basic level and can think more about UI/workflow.
Test Plan:
Visited the page, it loaded a mostly-reasonable item and then rendered nonsense:
{F4975050}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12738
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18008
Summary: Ref T12738. Some of the Nuance "form" workflows currently fatal after work on the GitHub stuff. Try to make everything stop fataling, at least.
Test Plan: Using "Complaints Form" no longer fatals, and now lodges a complaint instead.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12738
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18007
Summary: Ref T12738. Update sources to modular transactions.
Test Plan: Created and edited a source.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12738
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17994
Summary:
Ref T12738. Moves existing non-modular transactions to modular transactions.
Some of these are pretty flimsy, but a lot of them don't actually work or do anything in Nuance yet anyway.
Test Plan: Gently poked Nuance, nothing fell over.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12738
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17990
Summary:
This has been replaced by `PolicyCodex` after D16830. Also:
- Rebuild Celerity map to fix grumpy unit test.
- Fix one issue on the policy exception workflow to accommodate the new code.
Test Plan:
- `arc unit --everything`
- Viewed policy explanations.
- Viewed policy errors.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: hach-que, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16831
Summary:
Ref T10537. Currently, Nuance has a `NuanceRequestor` object, intended to represent the external user who created content (e.g., a GitHub account or a Twitter account or whatever).
This object is currently almost unused, and its design predates Doorkeeper. In D15541, I chose to use doorkeeper objects instead of NuanceRequestor objects to represent requestors.
I don't currently anticipate a need for such an object, given that we have Doorkeeper. If we do need it in the future for some reason, it would be fairly easy to restore it, create a requestor type which wraps a Doorkeeper object, and then migrate. Not super thrilling to do that, but not a huge mess.
`NuanceItem` still has a `requestorPHID`, but this is now a less formal object PHID instead of a more formal Requestor-object PHID, and holds a doorkeeper exeternal object PHID for GitHub events.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `nuancerequestor`.
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f`.
- Grepped for `requestor`, remaining uses of this term seem reasonable/correct.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15546
Summary:
Ref T10537. Generally, when users interact with Nuance items we'll dump a command into a queue and apply it in the background. This avoids race conditions with multiple users interacting with an item, which Nuance is more subject to than other applications because it has an import/external component.
The "sync" command doesn't actually do anything yet.
Test Plan: {F1186365}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Luke081515.2
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15506
Summary:
Ref T10537. This adds an update daemon for pulling item data (e.g., figuring out who the author of a GitHub comment is) and routing items (e.g., sending them to a queue or applying them directly to a task).
Also adds `bin/nuance update --item X` for doing this manually for debugging.
And adds item types, for specializing item behavior. Previously, sources completely dictated item behavior, but I think we want something a little more flexible.
Test Plan:
- This still does nothing.
- Ran `bin/nuance update --item 15`.
- Saw an item route to a default queue.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15441
Summary:
Ref T10537. Ref T10538. This polls the GitHub events API and creates Nuance items from the raw data.
It does nothing useful with them.
Test Plan:
- Polled GitHub.
- Saw some items get created.
- X-Poll-Interval seemed to work.
- ETag seemed to work.
- Recognizing when we hit items we've already seen seemed to work.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537, T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15440
Summary:
Ref T10537. More infrastructure:
- Put a `bin/nuance` in place with `bin/nuance import`. This has no useful behavior yet.
- Allow sources to be searched by substring. This supports `bin/nuance import --source whatever` so you don't have to dig up PHIDs.
Test Plan:
- Applied migrations.
- Ran `bin/nuance import --source ...` (no meaningful effect, but works fine).
- Searched for sources by substring in the UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15436
Summary:
Ref T10537. Some sources (like the future "GitHub Repository" source) need to poll remotes.
- Provide a mechanism for sources to emit import cursors.
- Hook them into the trigger daemon so they'll fire periodically.
- Provide some storage.
This diff does nothing useful or interesting, and is pure infrastructure.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f`, no adjustment issues.
- Poked around Nuance.
- Ran the trigger daemon, verified it didn't crash and checked for Nuance stuff to do.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15435
Summary: Ref T10537. Converts sources to EditEngine.
Test Plan:
- Created a new source.
- Edited an existing source.
- Submitted a complaint with the complaint form.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15434
Summary: Ref T10537. Update queue editing to use EditEngine.
Test Plan:
- Created a new queue.
- Edited an existing queue.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15431
Summary:
Ref T8783. Sort out some relationships and fields:
- Make Items 1:1 with Queues: each item is always in exactly one queue. Minor discussion on T8783. I think this is easier to understand and reason about (and implement!) and can't come up with any real cases where it isn't powerful enough.
- Remove "QueueItem", which allowed items to be in multiple queues at once.
- Remove "dateNuanced", which is equivalent to "dateCreated" in all cases.
Then add really basic routing:
- Add "Default Queue" for Sources. New items from the source route into that queue.
- (Some day there will be routing rules, but for now the rule is "always route into the default queue".)
- Show queue on items.
- Show more / more useful edit history and transactions in several UIs.
Test Plan:
{F749445}
{F749446}
{F749447}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8783
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13988
Summary:
Ref T8783.
The "View" UI is where a user would check their request for feedback or a resolution, if it's something that makes sense for them to interact with from the web UI.
The "Edit" UI is the manage/admin UI where you'd respond to a request. It's similar to the view UI but will have actions and eventually some queue UI, etc.
(I don't think items need a normal "Edit" UI -- it doesn't make sense to "Edit" a tweet or inbound email -- but maybe this will shuffle around a little eventually.)
Test Plan:
View
{F747218}
Edit
{F747219}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8783
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13980
Summary:
Ref T8783. If you have a source (like a "report bug" form), let it put a link (like "View Form") on the source detail page.
This also straightens out getting definitions from sources, which had a bug with the modern way we do `PhutilClassMapQuery`.
Specifically, if you called the old mechanism on two different sources, they'd return the same definition object, but they need to return different definitions.
Test Plan:
{F747093}
{F747092}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8783
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13966
Summary: I got a couple of tasks stuck in my local queue a while ago when touching Nuance, fix a couple minor issues to clean them up.
Test Plan: Ran tasks in queue, got clean results.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13532
Summary:
Ref T8434. Hard-codes form sources as a complaint form.
This form is close to perfect and I'm not actually sure we need to let users customize it at all.
Test Plan: {F473587}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8434
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13166
Summary: Ref T8434. Throw these together.
Test Plan: Created a new Queue.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8434
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13163
Summary:
Ref T8434. Minor cleanup/modernization. I made type selection modal (like Herald, Auth, etc) so we can render the form on the next screen based on the type.
{F472519}
Test Plan: Created a new source, edited an existing source.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8434
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13161
Summary: Ref T8434. Touch things up a bit. This also cleans up the missing ApplicationTransactionInterface for T6367.
Test Plan: Didn't create a new queue. Didn't edit an existing queue.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jeremyb, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8434
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13160
Summary: Use `__CLASS__` instead of hard-coding class names. Depends on D12605.
Test Plan: Eyeball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12806
Summary: Fixes T6693.
Test Plan:
Made a bunch of comments on a diff with differential, being sure to leave inlines here and there. This reproduced the issue in T6693. With this patch this issue no longer reproduces!
Successfully "showed older changes" in Maniphest too.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6693
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10931
Summary:
Ref T4712. Specifically...
- Differential
- needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented
- Audit
- needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented
- Repository
- one object needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- setShouldTerminate(true)
- Ponder
- BONUS BUG FIX - leaving a comment on an answer had a bad redirect URI
- both PonderQuestion and PonderAnswer needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- setShouldTerminate(true) on both "history" controllers
- left a "TODO" on buildAnswers on the question view controller, which is non-standard and should be re-written eventually
- Phortune
- BONUS BUG FIX - fix new user "createNewAccount" code to not fatal
- PhortuneAccount, PhortuneMerchant, and PhortuneCart needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- setShouldTerminate(true) on Account view, merchant view, and cart view controller
- Fund
- Legalpad
- Nuance
- NuanceSource needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- Releeph (this product is kind of a mess...)
- HACKQUEST - had to manually create an arcanist project to even be able to make a "product" and get started...!
- BONUS BUG FIX - make sure to "setName" on product edit
- ReleephProject (should be ReleepProduct...?), ReleephBranch, and ReleepRequest needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- Harbormaster
- HarbormasterBuildable, HarbormasterBuild, HarbormasterBuildPlan, and HarbormasterBuildStep all needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- setShouldTerminate(true) all over the place
Test Plan: foreach application, viewed the timeline(s) and made sure they still rendered
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4712
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10925
Summary:
Ref T1191. Now that the whole database is covered, we don't need to do as much work to build expected schemata. Doing them database-by-database was helpful in converting, but is just reudndant work now.
Instead of requiring every application to build its Lisk objects, just build all Lisk objects.
I removed `harbormaster.lisk_counter` because it is unused.
It would be nice to autogenerate edge schemata, too, but that's a little trickier.
Test Plan: Database setup issues are all green.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10620
Summary:
Ref T1191. We have several keys on `<x, y, id>`. When `id` is an auto-increment primary key, I believe this is exactly equivalent to a key on `<x, y>`, because the leaf nodes are implicitly sorted by `id`. We omit the implicit `id` elsewhere.
It would be nice to drop the `id` bit for consistency, but it's not doing any harm and this doesn't need to block the primary work of T1191.
Test Plan: Saw slightly fewer warnings.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10592
Summary:
Ref T1191.
- Adds definitions for missing keys and keys with wrong uniqueness. Generally, I defined these before fixing the key query to actually pull all keys and support uniqueness.
- Moves "key uniqueness" to note severity; this is fixable (probably?) and there are no remaining issues.
- Moves "Missing Key" to note severity; missing keys are fixable and all remaining missing keys are really missing (either missing edge keys, or missing PHID keys):
{F210089}
- Moves "Surplus Key" to note seveirty; surplus keys are fixable all remaining surplus keys are really surplus (duplicate key in Harbormaster, key on unused column in Worker):
{F210090}
Test Plan:
- Vetted missing/surplus/unique messages.
- 146 issues remaining.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10590
Summary: Ref T1191. Handful of minor things here (T6150, T6149, T6148, T6147, T6146) but nothing very noteworthy.
Test Plan: Viewed web UI, saw fewer errors.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10527
Summary: Ref T5655. Rename `PhabricatorPHIDType` subclasses for clarity (see discussion in D9839). I'm not too keen on some of the resulting class names, so feel free to suggest alternatives.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9986
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary:
pretty simple. did the bare minimum in the editor, etc. to be able to create an item from the conduit console.
I put the work in the editor for initializing new values, rather than some initializeNewItem method, mainly because Items don't have policy directly but instead policy will be defined by the queue(s) the item is in. The editor is definitely going to host this work, so it felt like it might be better to do it this way in time...? anyway, easy to make an initializeNew method instead if you want to have that paradigm going all the time.
Test Plan: made an item from teh conduit console - success. verified errors for missing data as well
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7879
Summary: ...and get the basic edit flow "working" for a new NuanceSourceDefinition - the Phabricator Form. ...and fix a dumb bug in the query class so when you redirect to the view page / try to edit an existing NuanceSource you don't fatal.
Test Plan: played around with the edit form and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7585
Summary: another little piece here that basically just adds some permissions to source editing. serving it up before I do anything too complicated to make sure it seems kosher. in terms of what comes next this form needs to be dynamic based on source type so there'll be some fun there. That said, I plan to implement a more simple "phabricator form" only version to start here and flesh out a few other things like queues with that.
Test Plan: set permission to no one for source edit and got a nice error page.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7535
Summary:
I updated the wiki too - https://secure.phabricator.com/w/projects/pebkac/ - with what I am thinking right now. Rough plan here is
- next diff:
- implement editors and transactions
- implement "web type" for contact source
- /pebkac/item/new/ will be the entry point for this
- implement "actions" on a contact
- probably some "polish" on the scaffolding laid out here; like "create" permissions maybs
- diffs after that:
- implement "twitter" type for source
- implement email reply handler stuff for item and source
Probs a great time to blast huge holes in all this stuff. :D
Test Plan: these pages load and arc lint doesn't complain
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7465
