1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-28 09:42:41 +01:00
Commit graph

121 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
ce6e020d5d Don't make an expensive, unused call to test if a viewer can reassign a task
Summary: Depends on D19224. Ref T13106. Computing this is expensive and the value is not used. This came from D15432, but we never actually shipped that feature.

Test Plan: Saw local query cost drop from 139 to 110 with no change in functionality. Grepped for removed symbols.

Maniphest Tasks: T13106

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19225
2018-03-14 12:46:27 -07:00
epriestley
df8d4dff67 Raise a warning when mentioning a user in a comment on a draft revision
Summary: See PHI433. Ref T13102. Users in the wild have mixed expecations about exactly what "draft" means. Recent changes have tried to make behavior more clear. As part of clarifying messaging, make it explicit that `@mention` does not work on drafts by showing users a warning when they try to `@mention` a user.

Test Plan:
  - Mentioned users on drafts, got a warning.
  - Posted normal comments on drafts, no warning.
  - Posted normal/mention comments on non-drafts, no warning.

Maniphest Tasks: T13102

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19210
2018-03-12 17:03:14 -07:00
epriestley
28854ae812 Return a integer JSON type from "*.edit" endpoints for the object ID
Summary: See PHI425. See T12678. This should be an integer, but may be a string.

Test Plan: Called `differential.revision.edit`, observed integer in result instead of string.

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19186
2018-03-07 06:27:35 -08:00
epriestley
5e6e9fcc56 When purging drafts after a transaction edit, purge all drafts
Summary: Fixes T13071. See that task for discusison. I think this `<= version` constraint is needless in normal cases (it should match everything in the table anyway), and slightly harmful in bizarre cases where a draft somehow gets a much larger ID than it should have.

Test Plan:
  - Gave a draft an unreasonably large ID.
  - Pre-patch, observed: submitting comments on the draft's object does not clear the draft.
  - Post-patch: submitting comments on the draft's object now clears the draft correctly.
  - Also added comments/actions, reloaded pages, saw drafts stick properly.

Maniphest Tasks: T13071

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19060
2018-02-11 06:01:09 -08:00
epriestley
7a43181337 Organize bulk edit actions into nice groups
Summary: Ref T13025. We're getting kind of a lot of actions, so put them in nice groups so they're easier to work with.

Test Plan: {F5386038}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18880
2018-01-19 13:22:25 -08:00
epriestley
a26cf20dd1 Fix a bug with setting custom PHID list field values via Conduit and prepare for bulk edits
Summary:
Ref T13025. Custom field transactions work somewhat unusually: the values sometimes need to be encoded. We currently do not apply this encoding correctly via Conduit.

For example, setting some custom PHID field to `["PHID-X-Y"]` fails with a bunch of JSON errors.

Add an extra hook callback so that EditTypes can apply processing to transaction values, then apply the correct CustomField processing.

This only affects Conduit. In a future diff, this also allows bulk edit of custom fields to work correctly.

Test Plan: Added a custom field to Maniphest with a list of projects. Used Conduit to bulk edit it (which now works, but did not before). Used the web UI to bulk edit it.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18876
2018-01-19 12:51:35 -08:00
epriestley
1e51f1d0dc Reuse more transaction construction code in bulk editor
Summary:
Ref T13025. Currently, the bulk editor takes an HTTP request and emits a list of "raw" transactions (simple dictionaries). This goes into the job queue, and the background job builds a real transaction.

However, the logic to turn an HTTP request into a raw transaction is ending up with some duplication, since we generally already have logic to turn an HTTP request into a full object.

Instead: build real objects first, then serialize them to dictionaries. Send those to the job queue, rebuild them into objects again, and we end up in the same spot with a little less code duplication.

Finally, delete the mostly-copied code.

Test Plan: Used bulk editor to add comments, projects, and rename tasks.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18875
2018-01-19 12:49:17 -08:00
epriestley
91a78db99b Support "Assign To" in Maniphest bulk editor
Summary:
Ref T13025. See PHI173. This supports the "Assign to" field in the new editor.

This is very slightly funky: to unassign tasks, you need to leave the field blank. I have half a diff to fix this, but the way the `none()` token works in the default datasource is odd so it needs a separate datasource. I'm punting on this for now since it works, at least, and isn't //completely// unreasonable.

This also simplifies some EditEngine stuff a little. Notably:

  - I reorganized EditType construction slightly so subclasses can copy/paste a little bit less.
  - EditType had `field` and `editField` properties which had the same values. I canonicalized on `editField` and made this value set a little more automatically.

Test Plan: Used bulk editor to reassign some tasks. By leaving the field blank, unassigned tasks.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18874
2018-01-19 12:48:41 -08:00
epriestley
0cad6021b6 Restore "Tags" and "Subscribers" edit capabilities to Maniphest bulk editor
Summary: Depends on D18867. Ref T13025. Fixes T8740. Rebuilds the tag/subscriber actions (add, remove, set) into the bulk editor.

Test Plan: Added, removed and set these values via bulk edit.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025, T8740

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18868
2018-01-19 12:47:10 -08:00
epriestley
687fada5af Restore bulk edit support for remarkup fields (description, add comment)
Summary:
Depends on D18866. Ref T13025. Fixes T12415. This makes the old "Add Comment" action work, and adds support for a new "Set description to" action (possibly, I could imagine "append description" being useful some day, maybe).

The implementation is just a `<textarea />`, not a whole fancy remarkup box with `[Bold] [Italic] ...` buttons, preview, typeaheads, etc. It would be nice to enrich this eventually but doing the rendering in pure JS is currently very involved.

This requires a little bit of gymnastics to get the transaction populated properly, and adds some extra validation since we need some code there anyway.

Test Plan:
  - Changed the description of a task via bulk editor.
  - Added a comment to a task via bulk editor.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025, T12415

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18867
2018-01-19 12:45:34 -08:00
epriestley
09e71a4082 Define bulk edits in terms of EditEngine, not hard-coded ad-hoc definitions
Summary:
Depends on D18862. See PHI173. Ref T13025. Fixes T10005. This redefines bulk edits in terms of EditEngine fields, rather than hard-coding the whole thing.

Only text fields -- and, specifically, only the "Title" field -- are supported after this change. Followup changes will add more bulk edit parameter types and broader field support.

However, the title field now works without any Maniphest-specific code, outside of the small amount of binding code in the `ManiphestBulkEditor` subclass.

Test Plan: Used the bulk edit workflow to change the titles of tasks.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13025, T10005

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18863
2018-01-19 12:43:47 -08:00
epriestley
6d9776fa89 Give EditEngine a Conduit-specific initialization pathway for objects
Summary:
Depends on D18845. See PHI243 for context and more details.

Briefly, some objects need a "type" transaction (or something similar) very early on, and we can't generate their fields until we know the object type. Drydock blueprints are an example: a blueprint's fields depend on the blueprint's type.

In web interfaces, the workflow just forces the user to select a type first. For Conduit workflows, I think the cleanest approach is to proactively extract and apply type information before processing the request. This will make the implementation a little messier, but the API cleaner.

An alternative is to add more fields to the API, like a "type" field. This makes the implementation cleaner, but the API messier. I think we're better off favoring a cleaner API here.

This change just makes it possible for `DrydockBlueprintEditEngine` to look at the incoming transactions and extract a "type"; it doesn't actually change any behavior.

Test Plan: Performed edits via API, but this change doesn't alter any behavior.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18847
2018-01-04 10:07:07 -08:00
Tim Hirsh
60e5c0ec1b Add drydock.blueprint.edit Conduit method
Summary:
Ref: https://admin.phacility.com/PHI243

Since our use case primarily focuses on transaction editing, this patch implements the `drydock.blueprint.edit` api method with the understanding that:
a) this is a work in progress
b) object editing is supported, but object creation is not yet implemented

Test Plan:
* updated existing blueprints via Conduit UI
* regression tested `maniphest.edit` by creating new and updating existing tasks

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Subscribers: Korvin, yelirekim, jcox

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18822
2017-12-08 11:55:08 -05:00
Dmitri Iouchtchenko
9bd6a37055 Fix spelling
Summary: Noticed a couple of typos in the docs, and then things got out of hand.

Test Plan:
  - Stared at the words until my eyes watered and the letters began to swim on the screen.
  - Consulted a dictionary.

Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Subscribers: epriestley, yelirekim, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18693
2017-10-09 10:48:04 -07:00
Chad Little
a903388d4f Update EditEngine pages to take a page header separate
Summary: This simplifies EditEngine pages in general by removing the dual header, and extending to allow setting of a custom PHUIHeaderView if needed (like settings).

Test Plan:
Review all settings pages, review task, project pages. This should all be fine, but is a big change maybe some layouts I'm not considering. Tested these all mobile, destkop as well.

{F5166181}

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Spies: Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18527
2017-09-05 20:07:11 -07:00
Chad Little
dc10bb1f49 Update Settings to use TwoColumn fixed layout
Summary: Simplifies the page, adds base support for PHUITwoColumn fixed from Instances (which I'll delete css there).

Test Plan:
click on every settings page, UI seems in tact, check mobile, desktop, mobile menus.

{F5102572}

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18436
2017-08-17 08:51:17 -07:00
Chad Little
83f66ce55e Update Settings to use full side-navigation
Summary: Moves Settings to use a normal side navigation vs. a two column side navigation. It also updates Edit Engine to do the same, but I don't think there are other callsites. Added a consistent header for better clarification if you were editng your settings, global settings, or a bot's settings.

Test Plan: Test each page on a personal account, create global settings, test each page there, create a bot account, and test each page on the bot account. Anything else?

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18342
2017-08-04 10:23:01 -07:00
epriestley
742c3a834f Provide UI hints about task subtypes
Summary:
Ref T12314. Open to counterdiffs / iterating / suggestions / skipping most or all of this, mostly just throwing this out there as a maybe-reasonable first pass.

When a task has a subtype (like "Plant" or "Animal"), provide some hints on the task list, workboards, and task detail.

To make these hints more useful, allow subtypes to have icons and colors.

Also use these icons and colors in the typeahead tokens.

The current rule is that we show the subtype if it's not the default subtype. Another rule we could use is "show the subtype if there's more than one subtype defined", but my guess is that most installs will mostly have something like "normal task" as the default subtype.

Test Plan:
The interfaces this affects are: task detail view, task list view, workboard cards, subtype typeahead.

{F3539128}

{F3539144}

{F3539167}

{F3539185}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Subscribers: johnny-bit, bbrdaric, benwick, fooishbar

Maniphest Tasks: T12314

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17451
2017-05-26 13:58:41 -07:00
epriestley
1953ab98be Don't show the "Override Lock" prompt when creating objects
Summary:
Fixes T12369. When you create objects they may technically be locked: either because the default state is legitimately locked, or because the default policies prevent you from viewing so we sort of technically end in a locked state.

Regardless, don't prompt during creation, since this prompt isn't useful even if the lock detection is completely legitimate.

Test Plan:
  - In {nav Applications > Maniphest > Configure}, set "Default View Policy" to "No One".
  - Tried to create a task.
  - Before patch: prompted to override lock.
  - After patch: no override prompt.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Subscribers: d.maznekov

Maniphest Tasks: T12369

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17541
2017-03-23 06:40:14 -07:00
epriestley
0e7a5623e3 Allow task statuses to "lock" them, preventing additional comments and interactions
Summary:
Ref T12335. See that task for discussion. Here are the behavioral changes:

  - Statuses can be flagged with `locked`, which means that tasks in that status are locked to further discussion and interaction.
  - A new "CAN_INTERACT" permission facilitates this. For most objects, "CAN_INTERACT" is just the same as "CAN_VIEW".
  - For tasks, "CAN_INTERACT" is everyone if the status is a normal status, and no one if the status is a locked status.
  - If a user doesn't have "Interact" permission:
    - They can not submit the comment form.
    - The comment form is replaced with text indicating "This thing is locked.".
    - The "Edit" workflow prompts them.

This is a mixture of advisory and hard policy checks but sholuld represent a reasonable starting point.

Test Plan: Created a new "Locked" status, locked a task. Couldn't comment, saw lock warning, saw lock prompt on edit. Unlocked a task.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T12335

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17453
2017-03-02 16:57:10 -08:00
epriestley
0a0ac1302f Prevent users from taking "edit"-like actions via comment forms if they don't have edit permission
Summary:
Ref T12335. Fixes T11207. Edit-like interactions which are not performed via "Edit <object>" are a bit of a grey area, policy-wise.

For example, you can correctly do these things to an object you can't edit:

  - Comment on it.
  - Award tokens.
  - Subscribe or unsubscribe.
  - Subscribe other users by mentioning them.
  - Perform review.
  - Perform audit.
  - (Maybe some other stuff.)

These behaviors are all desirable and correct. But, particularly now that we offer stacked actions, you can do a bunch of other stuff which you shouldn't really be able to, like changing the status and priority of tasks you can't edit, as long as you submit the change via the comment form.

(Before the advent of stacked actions there were fewer things you could do via the comment form, and more of them were very "grey area", especially since "Change Subscribers" was just "Add Subscribers", which you can do via mentions.)

This isn't too much of a problem in practice because we won't //show// you those actions if the edit form you'd end up on doesn't have those fields. So on intalls like ours where we've created simple + advanced flows, users who shouldn't be changing task priorities generally don't see an option to do so, even though they technically could if they mucked with the HTML.

Change this behavior to be more strict: unless an action explicitly says that it doesn't need edit permission (comment, review, audit) don't show it to users who don't have edit permission and don't let them take the action.

Test Plan:
  - As a user who could not edit a task, tried to change status via comment form; received policy exception.
  - As a user who could not edit a task, viewed a comment form: no actions available (just "comment").
  - As a user who could not edit a revision, viewed a revision form: only "review" actions available (accept, resign, etc).
  - Viewed a commit form but these are kind of moot because there's no separate edit permission.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T12335, T11207

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17452
2017-03-02 16:56:57 -08:00
epriestley
6f7bb8c91a On workboards, provide all of the supported "create task" forms in the dropdown
Summary:
Ref T12314. Ref T6064. Ref T11580. If an install defines several different task create forms (like "Create Plant" and "Create Animal"), allow any of them to be created directly onto a workboard column.

This is just a general consistency improvement that makes Custom Forms and Workboards work together a bit better. We might do something fancier eventually for T6064 (which wants fewer clicks) and/or T11580 (which wants per-workboard control over forms or defaults).

Test Plan:
  - Created several different types of tasks directly onto a workboard.
  - Faked just one create form, saw the UI unchanged (except that it respects any renaming).

{F3492928}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T12314, T11580, T6064

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17446
2017-03-02 04:24:40 -08:00
epriestley
7eab75410a When editing a subtyped object, use edit forms of the same subtype
Summary:
Ref T12314. When we pick an "Edit" form for a subtyped object, only consider forms with the same subtype.

For example, editing an "Animal" uses the forms with subtype "animal" which are marked as edit forms.

This also makes "Create Subtask" carry the parent task's type.

Test Plan:
  - Edited an Animal, got an animal edit form.
  - Edited a normal task, got a normal task form.
  - Edited a paste, got the normal workflow.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T12314

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17445
2017-03-02 04:24:28 -08:00
epriestley
4948a21959 Allow tasks to be searched by subtype
Summary:
Ref T12314. Allow tasks to be queried by subtype using a typeahead.

Open to a better default icon. I'll probably let you configure them later.

Just hide this constraint if there's only one subtype.

Test Plan:
  - Searched for subtypes.
  - Verified that the control hides if there is only one subtype.

{F3492293}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T12314

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17444
2017-03-02 04:20:38 -08:00
epriestley
4a061b1def When an object which supports subtypes is created, set its subtype to the creating form's subtype
Summary:
Ref T12314. If you set a form to have the "plant" subtype, then create a task with it, save "plant" as the task subtype.

For Conduit, the default subtype is used by default, but a new "subtype" transaction is exposed. You can apply this transaction at create time to create an object of a certain subtype, or at any later time to change the subtype of an object.

This still doesn't do anything particularly useful or interesting.

Test Plan:
  - Created a non-subtyped object (a Paste).
  - Created "task" and "plant" tasks via different forms.
  - Created "default" and "plant" tasks via Conduit.
  - Changed the subtype of a task via Conduit.
  - Tried to set a bad subtype.

{F3492061}

{F3492066}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T12314

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17443
2017-03-02 04:18:23 -08:00
epriestley
b9d60d2653 Allow EditEngine forms for objects which support subtyping to have a subtype configured
Summary:
Ref T12314. This adds a "Change Form Subtype" workflow to the EditEngine form configuration screen, for forms that edit/create objects which support subtyping (for now, only tasks).

For example, this allows you to switch a form from being a "task" form to a "plant" or "animal" form.

Doing this doesn't yet do anything useful or interesting. I'm also not showing it in the UI yet since I'm not sure what we should make that look like (presumably, we should just echo whatever UI we end up with on tasks).

Test Plan:
  - Changed the subtype of a task form.
  - Verified that the "Change Subtype" action doesn't appear on other forms (for example, those for Pastes).

{F3491374}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T12314

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17442
2017-03-02 04:18:06 -08:00
epriestley
dc7ecf5875 Add "subtype" storage to Maniphest tasks
Summary: Ref T12314. Provides a field on tasks for storing subtypes. Does nothing interesting yet.

Test Plan:
  - Ran storage upgrade.
  - Created some tasks.
  - Looked in the database.
  - Used Conduit to query some tasks.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T12314

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17441
2017-03-02 04:17:47 -08:00
epriestley
1b96f2fc28 Add maniphest.subtypes for configuring task subtypes
Summary:
Ref T12314. Builds toward letting you define "animal" and "plant" tasks.

This just adds some configuration. I'll probably add some more quality-of-life options (like "icon") later but these are the only bits I'm sure I'll need.

Test Plan:
  - Configured sensible subtypes.
  - Tried to configure bad subtypes: bad key, missing "default", duplicate keys. Got sensible error messages.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T12314

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17440
2017-03-02 04:16:51 -08:00
epriestley
91ef237290 Add a "subtype" field to EditEngine forms
Summary:
Ref T12314. This adds storage so EditEngine forms can later be marked as edit fields for particular types of objects (like an "animal edit form" vs a "plant edit form").

We'll take you to the right edit form when you click "Edit" by selecting among forms with the same subtype as the task.

This doesn't do anything very interesting on its own.

Test Plan:
  - Ran `bin/storage upgrade`.
  - Verified database got the field with proper values.
  - Created a new form, checked the database.
  - Ran unit tests.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T12314

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17439
2017-03-02 04:16:27 -08:00
epriestley
4540ae028a Fix "Create Form" link destinations when editing edit forms
Summary:
Fixes T12301. In D17372, this changed to use generic EditEngines instead of the proper runtime engine. Normally this doesn't matter, but can in this case.

After loading the configurations normally, swap their attached engines for the specific configured runtime engine we're currently executing.

Test Plan: Clicked "Create Form" from the Maniphest form list, saw it go to "Create Maniphest Form", not "Create Generic Meta-Form".

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T12301

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17398
2017-02-22 15:00:05 -08:00
epriestley
b2739710ba Don't allow forms which can't create objects to be added to profile menus
Summary:
Fixes T12281. Some forms (like Settings) can't actually create new objects. Currently, though, you can select them and add them to profile menus; if you do, they fail when building an item.

Kick them out of the typeahead, and decline to render them in menus.

Test Plan:
Added "Create Settings" to a menu, no longer fatals after patch (item vanished from menu, still editable normally to get rid of it).

Tried to add another "Create Settings", no longer available in typehaead.

Added some normal stuff.

Viewed a choose-among-forms dropdown in Maniphest, which still worked normally.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T12281

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17372
2017-02-16 15:45:11 -08:00
epriestley
8113b76910 Validate menu item fields (links, projects, dashboards, applications, forms, etc)
Summary:
Ref T12128. This adds validation to menu items.

This feels a touch flimsy-ish (kind of copy/paste heavy?) but maybe it can be cleaned up a bit once some similar lightweight modular item types (build steps in Harbormaster, blueprints in Drydock) convert.

Test Plan:
  - Tried to create each item with errors (no dashboard, no project, etc). Got appropriate form errors.
  - Created valid items of each type.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T12128

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17235
2017-01-20 11:58:25 -08:00
epriestley
9d3f09ab47 Modularize global quick create builtin items
Summary: Ref T5867. Instead of hard-coding projects, tasks and repositories, let EditEngines say "I want a quick create item" so third-party code can also hook into the menu without upstream changes.

Test Plan: Saw same default items in menu.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T5867

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17215
2017-01-17 15:56:31 -08:00
epriestley
7276af6a81 Make yellow "draft" bubbles more generic
Summary:
Fixes T12095. Ref T6660. The old code for this was specific to Differential, using the `DifferentialDraft` table.

Instead, make the `EditEngine` / `VersionedDraft` code create and remove a `<objectPHID, authorPHID>` edge when a particular author creates drafts.

Some applications have drafts beyond `VersionedDrafts`, notably inline comments. Before writing "yes, draft" or "no, no draft", ask the object if it has any custom draft stuff we need to know about.

This should fix all the yellow bubble bugs I created in T11114 and allow us to bring the feature to Audit fairly easily.

Test Plan: Created and deleted comments and inlines, reloading the list view after each change. Couldn't find a way to break the list view anymore.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T12095, T6660

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17205
2017-01-13 09:02:19 -08:00
Chad Little
452f5bce18 Make some defaults for Quick Create / Favorites
Summary: Add in some basic defaults, Tasks, Projects, Repositories... anything else? Also switches "manage" context if you are an admin or user. Hides link if you are not logged in.

Test Plan: Review Global/Personal in Favorites app, click on each link.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17174
2017-01-11 08:46:33 -08:00
epriestley
aa6e788f36 Mark "v3" API methods as stable; mark obsoleted methods as "Frozen"
Summary:
Ref T12074. The "v3" API methods (`*.search`, `*.edit`) are currently marked as "unstable", but they're pretty stable and essentially all new code should be using them.

Although these methods are seeing some changes, almost all changes are additive (support for new constraints or attachemnts) and do not break backward compatibility. We have no major, compatibility-breaking changes planned.

I don't want to mark the older methods "deprecated" yet since `arc` still uses a lot of them and there are some capabilities not yet available on the v3 methods, but introduce a new "frozen" status with pointers to the new methods.

Overall, this should gently push users toward the newer methods.

Test Plan: {F2325323}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T12074

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17158
2017-01-09 07:16:27 -08:00
Chad Little
e9243f22b9 Add Form MenuItem, Fix EditEngine Typeahead
Summary: Adds a FormEditEngine MenuItem for adding forms to Projects, Home, QuickCreate. Also adds an EditEngine typeahead that has token rendering issues currently.

Test Plan: Set a normal form as a menu item, edit it, set the name. Set a custom form as a menu item, edit it, set a name.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17098
2017-01-04 13:12:32 -08:00
epriestley
b373dcef74 Restore some minor state behaviors to Differential on EditEngine
Summary:
Ref T11114. This restores:

  - Commandeering should exeucte Herald.
  - Commandeering should swap reviewers.
  - "Request Review" on an "Accepted" revision should downgrade reviewers so they have to accept again.

Test Plan:
  - Commandeered, saw Herald run and reviewers swap.
  - Requested review of an accepted revision, saw it drop down to "Needs Review" with "Accepted Prior" on the reviewer.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11114

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17118
2016-12-31 10:11:28 -08:00
epriestley
18249b097f Make inline comment preview and submission mostly work on EditEngine
Summary: Ref T11114. This comments nearly working on EditEngine. Only significant issue I caught is that the "View" link doesn't render properly because it depends on JS which is tricky to hook up. I'll clean that up in a future diff.

Test Plan: {F2279201}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11114

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17116
2016-12-31 10:10:29 -08:00
epriestley
48fcfeadaf Allow comment actions to be grouped; group Differential "Review" and "Revision" actions
Summary:
Ref T11114. Differential has more actions than it once did, and may have further actions in the future.

Make this dropdown a little easier to parse by grouping similar types of actions, like "Accept" and "Reject".

(The action order still needs to be tweaked a bit.)

Test Plan: {F2274526}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Subscribers: eadler

Maniphest Tasks: T11114

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17114
2016-12-31 10:09:41 -08:00
epriestley
706c21375e Remove empty implementations of describeAutomaticCapabilities()
Summary:
This has been replaced by `PolicyCodex` after D16830. Also:

  - Rebuild Celerity map to fix grumpy unit test.
  - Fix one issue on the policy exception workflow to accommodate the new code.

Test Plan:
  - `arc unit --everything`
  - Viewed policy explanations.
  - Viewed policy errors.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Subscribers: hach-que, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16831
2016-11-09 15:24:22 -08:00
epriestley
bd3233d3ab Use a more conventional placement of parentheses
Auditors: avivey
2016-11-04 16:59:09 -07:00
epriestley
0f1785c0aa Allow EditEngine to build NUX buttons that point at the right place
Summary:
Fixes T11812.

  - Pull the logic for building the "Create Whatever" dropdown out.
  - Use it to generate NUX buttons, too.
  - Use the new logic in Paste and Maniphest.

Test Plan:
  - Viewed Paste NUX, button worked.
  - Viewed Maniphest NUX with multiple create forms, button worked.

Reviewers: chad, avivey

Reviewed By: avivey

Subscribers: avivey

Maniphest Tasks: T11812

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16797
2016-11-04 09:51:25 -07:00
epriestley
29313372e7 Improve some commenting/editing behaviors for recurring events
Summary:
Ref T11809. Currently, commenting on a recurring event hits the same "one or all?" dialog that other edits do.

For comments and edits submitted via the comment widget, we can safely assume that you mean "just this one", since it doesn't really make sense to try to bulk-edit an event from that UI.

Test Plan: Commented on a recurring event parent and an event in the series.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11809

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16795
2016-11-02 14:08:55 -07:00
epriestley
a0ea31f47f When users edit recurring events, prompt to "Edit This Event" or "Edit All Future Events"
Summary:
Fixes T11804. This probably isn't perfect but seems to work fairly reasonably and not be as much of a weird nonsense mess like the old behavior was.

When a user edits a recurring event, we ask them what they're trying to do. Then we more or less do that.

Test Plan:
  - Edited an event in the middle of a series.
  - Edited the first event in a series.
  - Edited "just this" and "all future" events in various places in a series.
  - Edited normal events.
  - Cancelled various events.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11804

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16782
2016-10-31 16:38:32 -07:00
epriestley
4c3f09a6a6 Suggest better start/end datetimes for Calendar events
Summary:
Fixes T11638.

  - Fix a regression: I broke this "round to the nearest hour" code a while ago while fiddling with datetimes.
  - Improve a beahvior: from the day view, make the menu-bar "Create Event" button default to creating an event on the day you were viewing.

Test Plan: Created events from month and day views, got nice round numbers and proper day suggestions.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11638

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16754
2016-10-26 13:10:29 -07:00
Giedrius Dubinskas
c71bb0550c Conduit accept int/bool parameters as strings
Summary: Accept Conduit parameter values as strings (e.g. from `curl`) and convert to required type.

Test Plan:
Call conduit method with int/bool parameter iusing `curl` and make sure it does not result in validation error, e.g.
```
$ curl http://$PHABRICATOR_HOST/api/maniphest.search -d api.token=$CONDUIT_TOKEN -d constraints[modifiedEnd]=$(date +%s) -d constraints[hasParents]=true -d limit=1
```

Fixes T10456.

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Subscribers: Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T10456

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16694
2016-10-14 14:45:57 +00:00
epriestley
e5256bd815 Hide time controls when editing all-day Calendar events
Summary:
Ref T11326. When an event is all-day, hide the time controls for the start/end dates. These aren't used and aren't helpful/useful.

This got a little more complicated than it used to be because EditEngine forms may have only some of these controls present.

Test Plan: Edited an all-day event; edited a normal event; swapped an event between normal and all-day.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11326

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16327
2016-07-27 05:01:19 -07:00
epriestley
8a7ded6129 Fix one more remarkup line wrapping issue
Summary:
Ran into this while fixing T11098#179088.

The "Transaction Type" details in the conduit autogenerated documentation for `*.edit` endpoints still wraps incorrectly.

Test Plan: Purged remarkup cache, reloaded page, got full-width text.

Reviewers: avivey, chad

Reviewed By: chad

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16065
2016-06-07 07:04:29 -07:00
epriestley
b4a07d528f Allow users to unset "Editor", tailor short error messages properly on settings forms
Summary:
Ref T11098.

  - Allow "Editor" to be set to the empty string.
  - Don't match a validation error to a field unless the actual settings for the field and error match.

Test Plan:
  - Tried to set "Editor" to "", success.
  - Tried to set "Editor" to "javascript://", only that field got marked "Invalid".

Reviewers: avivey, chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11098

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16051
2016-06-05 14:03:02 -07:00