Summary: Fixes T8102. This makes public rooms actually work. Also lets users see the search listings page so they can wander into all public rooms without logging in.
Test Plan: As logged out user, visited ZXX and ZYY. ZXX was public, so I could see it and had a little "Login to Participate" button in the bottom. ZYY was not public so I was prompted to login. Back on ZXX I clicked the Conpherence crumb and got a sensible UI where most links prompted me to login. CLicked "search" and saw listings for all public rooms.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8102
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12778
Summary: Ref T7584. In Conpherence main view, this adds a "search" link right in the "Rooms" header. This piece addresses an outstanding item on T7584. This diff also adds a search button in the durable column that takes you to the application search. This kind of a big product bet that rooms are going to be dominating things and its most useful to find another room quickly from this view. That said, I think the application search should get massaged slightly to allow searching threads and this won't be much of a trade off at all.
Test Plan: verified new search links took me to correct place and displayed reasonably.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7584
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12215
Summary: Ref T7584. This hits all the major bullets there. Next step on T7584 is figuring out how it integrates into the full UI and column UI. That said, this is a bit buggy feeling right now since Conpherence as is assumes you are a participant all over the place and rooms make no such assumption. I'll probably this bit up next.
Test Plan:
viewed /conpherence/room/ and saw stuff. viewed the "participant" query as two different users and saw different correct result sets. made a room via the button and it worked. tried to view a room I wasn't a participant in and it failed horribly, which is something to fix in a future diff
created a thread via "send message" on a user profile and it worked
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7584
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12113
