1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-15 19:32:40 +01:00
Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
25cc90d632 Inch toward using ApplicationSearch to power related objects
Summary:
Ref T4788. Fixes T9232. This moves the "search for stuff to attach to this object" flow away from hard-coding and legacy constants and toward something more modular and flexible.

It also adds an "Edit Commits..." action to Maniphest, resolving T9232. The behavior of the search for commits isn't great right now, but it will improve once these use real ApplicationSearch.

Test Plan: Edited a tasks' related commits, mocks, tasks, etc.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T4788, T9232

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16189
2016-06-29 11:22:29 -07:00
epriestley
2cb779575d Split "Edit Blocking Tasks" into "Edit Parent Tasks" and "Edit Subtasks"
Summary:
Ref T11179. This splits "Edit Blocking Tasks" into two options now that we have more room ("Edit Parent Tasks", "Edit Subtasks").

This also renames "Blocking" tasks to "Subtasks", and "Blocked" tasks to "Parent" tasks. My goals here are:

  - Make the relationship direction more clear: it's more clear which way is up with "parent" and "subtask" at a glance than with "blocking" and "blocked" or "dependent" and "dependency".
  - Align language with "Create Subtask".
  - To some small degree, use more flexible/general-purpose language, although I haven't seen any real confusion here.

Fixes T6815. I think I narrowed this down to two issues:

  - Just throwing a bare exeception (we now return a dialog explicitly).
  - Not killing open transactions when the cyclec check fails (we now kill them).

Test Plan:
  - Edited parent tasks.
  - Edited subtasks.
  - Tried to introduce graph cycles, got a nice error dialog.

{F1697087}

{F1697088}

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T6815, T11179

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16166
2016-06-22 11:20:38 -07:00
epriestley
4bbe6f307a Resolve relationship edit conflicts more naturally
Summary:
Ref T11179. Ref T4768. Currently, on `master`, if two users open "Edit Revisions" at the same time, then add revisions A and B, only the last state wins (just "B").

Instead, apply these as "add A" and "add B" so they merge in a natural way.

Test Plan:
  - Opened edit dialog in two windows.
  - Added "A" in one, "B" in the other.
  - Saved both.
  - Saw "Added A" and "Added B" transactions, instead of "Added A" and "Removed A, added B".

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T4768, T11179

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16164
2016-06-22 11:17:30 -07:00
epriestley
b5d90b4714 Drive modular task relationships through a new "relationships" controller
Summary: Ref T11179. This is basically a "pro" controller to replace the SearchAttach controller. It does basically the same stuff, just in a (mostly) more modern and modular way.

Test Plan:
  - Added and removed mocks.
  - Added and removed revisions.
  - Everything worked just like it did before.

Reviewers: chad

Reviewed By: chad

Maniphest Tasks: T11179

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16163
2016-06-22 11:16:58 -07:00