Summary:
Fixes T4898. After we increased the strictness of the `%s` conversion, most `serialize()` output is rejected from the cache.
Drop the cache, change the column type to latin1_bin, and then use `%B` to mark the data as binary during query construction.
Test Plan: Viewed Differential, saw cache fills.
Reviewers: btrahan, spicyj
Reviewed By: spicyj
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4898
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9171
Summary:
Ref T4994. This stuff works:
- You can dump a blob of coverage information into `diffusion.updatecoverage`. This wipes existing coverage information and replaces it.
- It shows up when viewing files.
- It shows up when viewing commits.
This stuff does not work:
- When viewing files, the Javascript hover interaction isn't tied in yet.
- We always show this information, even if you're behind the commit where it was generated.
- You can't do incremental updates.
- There's no aggregation at the file (this file has 90% coverage), diff (the changes in this commit are 90% covered), or directory (the code in this directory has 90% coverage) levels yet.
- This is probably not the final form of the UI, storage, or API, so you should expect occasional changes over time. I've marked the method as "Unstable" for now.
Test Plan:
- Ran `save_lint.php` to check for collateral damage; it worked fine.
- Ran `save_lint.php` on a new branch to check creation.
- Published some fake coverage information.
- Viewed an affected commit.
- Viewed an affected file.
{F151915}
{F151916}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jhurwitz, epriestley, zeeg
Maniphest Tasks: T5044, T4994
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9022
Summary: This is useful when you're trying to onboard an entire office and you end up using the Google OAuth anyway.
Test Plan: tested locally. Maybe I should write some tests?
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9150
Summary:
This gets us the ability to specify a "layout mode" and which column a panel should appear in at panel add time. Changing the layout mode from a multi column view to a single column view or vice versa will reset all panels to the left most column.
You can also drag and drop where columns appear via the "arrange" mode.
We also have a new dashboard create flow. Create dashboard -> arrange mode. (As opposed to view mode.) This could all possibly use massaging.
Fixes T4996.
Test Plan:
made a dashboard with panels in multiple columns. verified correct widths for various layout modes
re-arranged collumns like whoa.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4996
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9031
Summary:
Create transaction, editor, etc, and move command generation over to editor.
Show in a timeline in the buildable page.
Also prevent Engine from creating an empty transaction when build starts (Fixes T4885).
Fixes T4886.
Test Plan: Restart builds and buildables, look at timeline.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4885, T4886
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9110
Summary: Fixes T5035. This migration isn't forward compatible after schema mutation.
Test Plan: Ran locally, will get reporting user to confirm.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: gera, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9101
Summary:
Ref T4455. This adds a `repository_parents` table which stores `<childCommitID, parentCommitID>` relationships.
For new commits, it is populated when commits are discovered.
For older commits, there's a `bin/repository parents` script to rebuild the data.
Right now, there's no UI suggestion that you should run the script. I haven't come up with a super clean way to do this, and this table will only improve performance for now, so it's not important that we get everyone to run the script right away. I'm just leaving it for the moment, and we can figure out how to tell admins to run it later.
The ultimate goal is to solve T2683, but solving T4455 gets us some stuff anyway (for example, we can serve `diffusion.commitparentsquery` faster out of this cache).
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/repository discover` to discover new commits in Git, SVN and Mercurial repositories.
- Used `bin/repository parents` to rebuild Git and Mercurial repositories (SVN repos just exit with a message).
- Verified that the table appears to be sensible.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jhurwitz, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4455
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9044
Summary:
Provides a working SMS implementation with support for Twilio.
This version doesn't really retry if we get any gruff at all. Future versions should retry.
Test Plan: used bin/sms to send messages and look at them.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: aurelijus, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T920
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8930
Summary: Fixes T4928. I'm not sure how this column was missing, but this patch can't hurt.
Test Plan: Reasoned about behavior.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4928
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8967
Summary: Fixes T4931. Each new credential should come with the ability to lock the credential permanently, so that no one can ever edit again. Each existing credential must allow user to lock existing credential.
Test Plan: Create new credential, verify that you can lock it before saving it. Open existing unlocked credential, verify that option to lock it exists. Once credential is locked, the option to reveal it should be disabled, and editing the credential won't allow username/password updates.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4931
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8947
Summary:
Ref T4749. Ref T3265. Ref T4909. Several goals here:
- Move user destruction to the CLI to limit the power of rogue admins.
- Start consolidating all "destroy named object" scripts into a single UI, to make it easier to know how to destroy things.
- Structure object destruction so we can do a better and more automatic job of cleaning up transactions, edges, search indexes, etc.
- Log when we destroy objects so there's a record if data goes missing.
Test Plan: Used `bin/remove destroy` to destroy several users.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3265, T4749, T4909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8940
Summary:
Ref T4398. This prompts users for multi-factor auth on login.
Roughly, this introduces the idea of "partial" sessions, which we haven't finished constructing yet. In practice, this means the session has made it through primary auth but not through multi-factor auth. Add a workflow for bringing a partial session up to a full one.
Test Plan:
- Used Conduit.
- Logged in as multi-factor user.
- Logged in as no-factor user.
- Tried to do non-login-things with a partial session.
- Reviewed account activity logs.
{F149295}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8922
Summary:
Ref T3583. Adds edges, query relationships, etc. Lots of debugging/temporary UI.
My general intent here is to use edges to track where panels appear, and then put additional data on the dashboard itself to control layout, positioning, etc.
Dashboards don't actually render yet so this is still pretty boring.
Test Plan:
{F149175}
{F149176}
{F149177}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3583
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8916
Summary: Ref T3583. These will be the primary class carrying panel implementations.
Test Plan:
{F149125}
{F149126}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3583
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8912
Summary:
Ref T4398. This is still pretty rough and isn't exposed in the UI yet, but basically works. Some missing features / areas for improvement:
- Rate limiting attempts (see TODO).
- Marking tokens used after they're used once (see TODO), maybe. I can't think of ways an attacker could capture a token without also capturing a session, offhand.
- Actually turning this on (see TODO).
- This workflow is pretty wordy. It would be nice to calm it down a bit.
- But also add more help/context to help users figure out what's going on here, I think it's not very obvious if you don't already know what "TOTP" is.
- Add admin tool to strip auth factors off an account ("Help, I lost my phone and can't log in!").
- Add admin tool to show users who don't have multi-factor auth? (so you can pester them)
- Generate QR codes to make the transfer process easier (they're fairly complicated).
- Make the "entering hi-sec" workflow actually check for auth factors and use them correctly.
- Turn this on so users can use it.
- Adding SMS as an option would be nice eventually.
- Adding "password" as an option, maybe? TOTP feels fairly good to me.
I'll post a couple of screens...
Test Plan:
- Added TOTP token with Google Authenticator.
- Added TOTP token with Authy.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8875
Summary:
Ref T4398. This is roughly a "sudo" mode, like GitHub has for accessing SSH keys, or Facebook has for managing credit cards. GitHub actually calls theirs "sudo" mode, but I think that's too technical for big parts of our audience. I've gone with "high security mode".
This doesn't actually get exposed in the UI yet (and we don't have any meaningful auth factors to prompt the user for) but the workflow works overall. I'll go through it in a comment, since I need to arrange some screenshots.
Test Plan: See guided walkthrough.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8851
Summary: Fixes T3566 List of poll actions should include ability to close an open poll or reopen a closed poll.
Test Plan: Poll author should be able to close/reopen poll. Non-author should get policy screen when attempting to close/reopen poll.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3566
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8846
Summary: Going to sit on this for a bit so we can fall back to it if needbe, but this table no longer has any reads or writes in the application.
Test Plan: Applied patch locally and poked around.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8190
Summary:
Ref T3551. Currently, ReleephRequests don't have a direct concept of the //object// being requested. You can request `D123`, but that is just a convenient way to write `rXyyyy`.
When the UI wants to display information about a revision, it deduces it by examining the commit.
This is primarily an attack on T3551, so we don't need to load <commit -> edge -> revision> (in an ad-hoc way) to get revisions. Instead, when you request a revision we keep track of it and can load it directly later.
Later, this will let us do more things: for example, if you request a branch, we can automatically update the commits (as GitHub does), etc. (Repository branches will need PHIDs first, of course.)
This adds and populates the column but doesn't use it yet. The second part of the migration could safely be run while Phabricator is up, although even for Facebook this table is probably quite small.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Verified existing requests associated sensibly.
- Created a new commit request.
- Created a new revision request.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3551
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8822
Summary:
Ref T4809. Buildables currently have buildStatus and buildableStatus. Neither are used, and no one knows why we have two.
I'm going to use buildableStatus shortly, but buildStatus is meaningless; burn it.
Test Plan: `grep`, examined similar get/set calls, created a new buildable, ran storage upgrade.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4809
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8796
Summary:
When we generate account tokens for CSRF keys and email verification, one of the inputs we use is the user's password hash. Users won't always have a password hash, so this is a weak input to key generation. This also couples CSRF weirdly with auth concerns.
Instead, give users a dedicated secret for use in token generation which is used only for this purpose.
Test Plan:
- Ran upgrade scripts.
- Verified all users got new secrets.
- Created a new user.
- Verified they got a secret.
- Submitted CSRF'd forms, they worked.
- Adjusted the CSRF token and submitted CSRF'd forms, verified they don't work.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8748
Summary: Fixes T3208. This forces us to bind+search even if there are no anonymous credentials.
Test Plan: Checked the box, saved the form. Unchecked the box, saved the form. LDAP??
Reviewers: Firehed
Reviewed By: Firehed
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3208
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8723
Summary:
This adds a system which basically keeps a record of recent actions, who took them, and how many "points" they were worth, like:
epriestley email.add 1 1233989813
epriestley email.add 1 1234298239
epriestley email.add 1 1238293981
We can use this to rate-limit actions by examining how many actions the user has taken in the past hour (i.e., their total score) and comparing that to an allowed limit.
One major thing I want to use this for is to limit the amount of error email we'll send to an email address. A big concern I have with sending more error email is that we'll end up in loops. We have some protections against this in headers already, but hard-limiting the system so it won't send more than a few errors to a particular address per hour should provide a reasonable secondary layer of protection.
This use case (where the "actor" needs to be an email address) is why the table uses strings + hashes instead of PHIDs. For external users, it might be appropriate to rate limit by cookies or IPs, too.
To prove it works, I rate limited adding email addresses. This is a very, very low-risk security thing where a user with an account can enumerate addresses (by checking if they get an error) and sort of spam/annoy people (by adding their address over and over again). Limiting them to 6 actions / hour should satisfy all real users while preventing these behaviors.
Test Plan:
This dialog is uggos but I'll fix that in a sec:
{F137406}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8683
Summary: Fixes T4703. This is a VARCHAR(255) for no particular reason.
Test Plan: {F136160}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8652
Summary: Ref T3549. This table isn't written to yet; rename it and the DAOs and modernize the history controller.
Test Plan: Viewed history page for a product.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3549
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8633
Summary: followup to D8544. This ends up creating an editor + transactions to get the job done.
Test Plan: made a column - saw a nice created transaction. edited the name - saw a nice name edit. deleted the column - saw a deleted transaction, updated "deleted" ui, and hte action change to activate. "Activated" the column and saw a transaction and updated UI. Tried to delete a column with tasks in it and got an error.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8620
Summary:
During migration of very old installs, this script no longer runs properly since at HEAD it can't index against older schemas.
Since it's pretty fluff, just toss it. Installs can run `bin/search index --type PROJ` after finishing migrations to achieve the same effect, if necessary.
Test Plan: eyeballed it
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8619
Summary:
Ref T4677. Currently, we record individual actions in a push as PhabricatorRepositoryPushLogs, but tie them together only loosely with a `transactionKey`.
Provide a real PushEvent object, and move some of the denormalized fields to it. This primarily just gives us more robust infrastructure for building, e.g., email about pushes, for T4677, since we can act on real PHIDs rather than passing awkward identifiers around.
Test Plan:
- Performed migration.
- Looked at database for consistency.
- Browsed/queried push logs.
- Pushed a bunch of stuff.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8615
Summary:
Ref T1049. Allows external systems to send a message to a build target. The primary intended use case is:
- You make an HTTP request to Jenkins.
- The build goes into a "waiting" state.
- Later, Jenkins calls `harbormaster.sendmessage` to report that the target passed or failed.
- The build continues as appropriate.
This is deceptively complicated because:
- There are a lot of race concerns. We might get a message back from an external system before it even responds to the request we made. We want to make sure we process these messages no matter when we receive them.
- These messages need to be sent to a build target (vs a build or buildable) because we'll get into trouble with parallelization later on otherwise (Jenkins is told to do 3 builds; we can't tell which ones failed or what overall state is unless the message are sent to targets).
- I initially thought about implementing this as a separate "Wait for a response from an external system" build step. This gets a lot more complicated for users once we do parallelization, though. Particularly, in the case where you've told Jenkins to do 3 builds, the three "wait" steps need to know which target they're waiting for (and jenkins needs to know some unique identifier for each target). So this pretty much boils down to a more complicated, more error-prone version of using target PHIDs.
This makes the already-muddy Build UI a bit worse, but it needs a general clarity pass anyway (it's showing way too much uninteresting data, and should show a better summary of results instead).
Test Plan:
- This doesn't really do anything interesting yet.
- Used Conduit to send messages to build plans.
- Viewed the messages on the build screen.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8604
Summary: Ref T1049. For consistency, rename these to "Harbormaster...".
Test Plan: Ran migration, ran builds, everything still works fine.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8602
Summary:
Ref T1049. Fixes T4602. Moves all the funky field stuff to CustomField. Uses ApplicationTransactions to apply and record edits.
This makes "artifact" fields a little less nice (but still perfectly usable). With D8599, I think they're reasonable overall. We can improve this in the future.
All other field types are better (e.g., fixes weird bugs with "bool", fixes lots of weird behavior around required fields), and this gives us access to many new field types.
Test Plan:
Made a bunch of step edits. Here's an example:
{F133694}
Note that:
- "Required" fields work correctly.
- the transaction record is shown at the bottom of the page.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4602, T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8600
Summary:
Ref T1812. I think integer constants are going to be confusing and error prone for users to interact with. For example, because we use 0-5, adding a second "open" status like "needs verification" without disrupting the existing statuses would require users to define a status with, e.g., constant `6`, but order it between constants `0` and `1`. And if they later remove statuses, they need to avoid reusing existing constants.
Instead, use more manageable string constants like "open", "resolved", etc.
We must migrate three tables:
- The task table itself, to update task status.
- The transaction table, to update historic status changes.
- The saved query table, to update saved queries which specify status sets.
Test Plan:
- Saved a query with complicated status filters.
- Ran migrations.
- Looked at the query, at existing tasks, and at task transactions.
- Forced migrations to run again to verify idempotentcy/safety.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1812
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8583
Summary: Fixes T4408. I had to add a "status" to colum. I think we'll need this once we get fancier anyway but for now we have "active" and deleted.
Test Plan: deleted a column. noted reloaded workboard with all those tasks back in the default colun. loaded a task and saw the initial transaction had a "Disabled" icon next to the deleted workboard. also saw the new transaction back to the default column worked.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4408
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8544
Summary:
Fixes T4637.
- We already allow you to order by this column but don't have a key on it. Add one.
- Expose UI for querying on ranges.
Test Plan:
- Ran some queries, got reasonable-looking results and no table scans.
Reviewers: btrahan, bigo
Reviewed By: bigo
Subscribers: bigo, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4637
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8557
Summary: Ref T2217. I'll hold this for a month or so, but once we're confident the migration didn't ruin anything we should nuke this old data -- it's just an insurance policy against discovering migration issues.
Test Plan: Will run in a month or so.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7104
Summary:
Ref T988. This fixes the biggest current problem with Diviner, which is dead links to articles.
In the new Diviner, articles can have both a "name" (derived from the file name, and used in the URI) and a "title" (optional, specified explicitly). For example, we have one document with the name "feedback" and the title "Give Feedback! Get Support!".
On disk, we want to use the name for the actual file where the text lives ("feedback.diviner"). We also want to use the name in the URI, to generate a clean URI and to allow us to retitle the document slightly without breaking links to it (for example, we renamed the "Backup" document to "Backups and Migrations").
However, when displaying the article we want to use the title.
Currently, you can //only// link to the name, not the title. This is inconvenient:
- We have a bunch of existing docs which link to titles.
- It's natural/intuitive to link to titles.
- Linking to titles makes it easier/cheaper to generate documentation, because we don't need to be able to resolve things at render time.
To remedy this, allow links to target either names or titles. If we miss on a name query, we'll do a title query. This is implemented with a slug hash to allow approximately correct titles (wrong case/spacing/punctuation, e.g.) and sidestep all the UTF8/column length issues.
(In the long run, atom resolution should theoretically be more sophistiated than it is now, and we should do render-time lookups on at least some documents to catch bad links. However, this is fairly complicated and a relatively advanced feature, and I think allowing links to titles is desirable no matter what.)
Test Plan: The user documentation book now has valid links to articles when the titles and names differ.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T988
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8407
Summary:
Ref T2222. Make the "EditPro" controller accommodate diff updates, and support the transaction type. This one is pretty straightforward.
Also make `revisionPHID` in the comments table nullable to fix the "Edit" action.
Test Plan:
- Created new revision.
- Updated revision.
- Tried to do some invalid stuff.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8376
Summary: Ref T2222. Ref T3886. Differential has a legacy storage table for auxiliary fields; move the data to modern storage.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Verified fields still worked properly afterward (view, edit, etc).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3886, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8355
Summary: Ref T2222. This is obsolete and no longer used. We could deduce it from transactions or commits in modern Phabricator if we wanted it. We may implement a more general mechanism for T4434.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8330
Summary:
Ref T1191. Test that MySQL's rules match those of `phutil_is_utf8_with_only_bmp_characters()`:
- Build a string with //every// character that we consider to be a BMP character.
- Write it into MySQL.
- Read it back out.
- Make sure MySQL didn't truncate it.
Test Plan: Ran unit test. This test runs pretty quickly (50ms), the string with every character isn't all that enormous.
Reviewers: btrahan, arice
Reviewed By: arice
CC: chad, arice, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1191
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8314
Summary: ...do it somewhat generically, so we could fairly easily add this to other applications. Fixes T3496. I got a wee bit lazy and decided not to migrate existing drafts. My excuses aside from laziness are doing it this way will let us see if anyone complains, we can always do a migration later if people do complain, and there's likely to be a lot of garbage data for older / bigger installs, and the migration didn't seem worth itgiven it would also likely be expensive in these cases.
Test Plan: made a draft inline comment on DX and observed DX had a note icon on Differential home page. made a draft comment on DX and observed DX had a note icon on Differential home page. deleted a draft inline comment and noted icon disappeared from Differential homepage. Submitted a draft comment + inline comment and noted icon disappeared.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3496
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8275
Summary: Fixes T4443. Plug VCS passwords into the shared key stretching. They don't use any real stretching now (I anticipated doing something like T4443 eventually) so we can just migrate them into stretching all at once.
Test Plan:
- Viewed VCS settings.
- Used VCS password after migration.
- Set VCS password.
- Upgraded VCS password by using it.
- Used VCS password some more.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4443
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8272
Summary:
Ref T1812. This cleans up most of the easy hard-coded references to specific statuses:
- The "fixes" language moves into ManiphestTaskStatus.
- Add a method to list open statuses.
- Add a method to test if a status is open.
- Add a method to get default status for new tasks.
Test Plan: Browsed around, lint, grep, created, filtered and updated tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1812
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8264
Summary:
Ref T2222. This is the big one.
This migrates each `DifferentialComment` to one or more ApplicationTransactions (action, cc, reviewers, update, comment, inlines), and makes `DifferentialComment` a double-reader for ApplicationTransactions.
The migration is pretty straightforward:
- If a comment took an action not otherwise covered, it gets an "action" transaction. This is something like "epriestley abandoned this revision.".
- If a comment updated the diff, it gets an "updated diff" transaction. Very old transactions of this type may not have a diff ID (probably only at Facebook).
- If a comment added or removed reviewers, it gets a "changed reviewers" transaction.
- If a comment added CCs, it gets a "subscribers" transaction.
- If a comment added comment text, it gets a "comment" transaction.
- For each inline attached to a comment, we generate an "inline" transaction.
Most comments generate a small number of transactions, but a few generate a significant number.
At HEAD, the code is basically already doing this, so comments in the last day or two already obey these rules, roughly, and will all generate only one transaction (except inlines).
Because we've already preallocated PHIDs in the comment text table, we only need to write to the transaction table.
NOTE: This significantly degrades Differential, making inline comments pretty much useless (they each get their own transaction, and don't show line numbers or files). The data is all fine, but the UI is garbage now. This needs to be fixed before we can deploy this to users, but it's easily separable since it's all just display code.
Specifically, they look like this:
{F112270}
Test Plan:
I've migrated locally and put things through their paces, but it's hard to catch sketchy stuff locally because most of my test data is nonsense and bad migrations wouldn't necessarily look out of place.
IMPORTANT: I'm planning to push this to a branch and then shift production over to the branch, and run it for a day or two before bringing it to master.
I generally feel good about this change: it's not that big since we were able to separate a lot of pieces out of it, and it's pretty straightforward. That said, it's still one of the most scary/dangerous changes we've ever made.
Reviewers: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8210
