Summary:
Ref T2787. A product is the abstract representation of something you can buy or rent/subscribe to. Although the interface isn't locked down yet, this would ultimately be internal/administrative.
Products likely have some user-facing skin on top of them: plans would have a purchasing/comparison flow, physical goods would have a storefront, etc., so products don't have any information like descriptions or images, just the data that Phortune needs to correctly bill accounts.
Generally, this is very basic for the moment.
Test Plan:
{F37594}
{F37595}
{F37596}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5441
Summary:
Hook @btrahan's Stripe form to the rest of Phortune.
- Users can add payment methods.
- They are saved to Stripe and associated with PhortunePaymentMethods on our side.
- Payment methods appear on account overview.
Test Plan:
{F37548}
{F37549}
{F37550}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5438
Summary:
Ref T2787. This does very little so far, but makes inroads on accounts and billing. This is mostly just modeled on what Stripe looks like. The objects are:
- **Account**: Has one or more authorized users, who can make manage the account. An example might be "Phacility", and the three of us would be able to manage it. A user may be associated with more than one account (e.g., a corporate account and a personal account) but the UI tries to simplify the common case of a single account.
- **Payment Method**: Something we can get sweet sweet money from; for now, a credit card registered with Stripe. Payment methods are associated with an account.
- **Product**: A good (one time charge) or service (recurring charge). This might be "t-shirt" or "enterprise plan" or "hourly support" or whatever else.
- **Purchase**: Represents a user purchasing a Product for an Account, using a Payment Method. e.g., you bought a shirt, or started a plan, or purchased support.
- **Charge**: Actual charges against payment methods. A Purchase can create more than one charge if it's a plan, or if the first charge fails and we re-bill.
This doesn't fully account for stuff like coupons/discounts yet but they should fit into the model without any issues.
This only implements `Account`, and that only partially.
Test Plan: {F37531}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5435
Summary: Mostly applies a new call spacing rule; also a few things that have slipped through via pull requests and such
Test Plan: `find src/ -type f -name '*.php' | xargs -n16 arc lint --output summary --apply-patches`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5002
Summary: Fixes various array_combine() warnings for PHP < 5.4
Test Plan: lint/unit/grep
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4660
Summary:
- Implements `javelin_tag()`, which is `javelin_render_tag()` on top of `phutil_tag()` instead of `phutil_render_tag()`.
- Manually converts all or almost all of the trivial callsites.
Test Plan:
- Site does not seem any more broken than before.
Reviewers: vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4639
Summary: This is used in every other view.
Test Plan: Browsed around.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4248
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.
Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
Summary:
This is the first step in Phabricator internationalization.
It adds a translation selector and calls it at startup.
Installations can add custom selectors to override some texts.
We can add official translations in future.
Next step is to allow user to choose his translation which will override the global one.
This is currently used only for English plurals.
Test Plan: Displayed a diff with unit test error, verified that it says 'Detail' or 'Details' and not 'Detail(s)'.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1139
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2753
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.
NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.
Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.
Auditors: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1103
Summary:
various stripe stuff, including
- external stripe library
- payment form
- test controller to play with payment form, sample business logic
My main questions / discussion topics are...
- is the stripe PHP library too big? (ie should I write something more simple just for phabricator?)
-- if its cool, what is the best way to include the client? (ie should I make it a submodule rather than the flat copy here?)
- is the JS I wrote (too) ridiculous?
-- particularly unhappy with the error message stuff being in JS *but* it seemed the best choice given the most juicy error messages come from the stripe JS such that the overall code complexity is lowest this way.
- how should the stripe JS be included?
-- flat copy like I did here?
-- some sort of external?
-- can we just load it off stripe servers at request time? (I like that from the "if stripe is down, stripe is down" perspective)
- wasn't sure if the date control was too silly and should just be baked into the form?
-- for some reason I feel like its good to be prepared to walk away from Stripe / switch providers here, though I think this is on the wrong side of pragmatic
Test Plan: - played around with sample client form
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2096
